Kubernetes SIG Contributor Experience, 5 Oct 2021

Previous Meeting Next Meeting

⏯

youtube image

►

From YouTube: [SIG ContribEx] APAC MoC BI-Weekly Blog Series for 20211005

Description

[SIG ContribEx] APAC MoC BI-Weekly Blog Series for 20211005

A

Okay, so since it's a official kubernetes calendar meeting so like we need to abide by the code of conduct and be nice to everyone and don't say anything that you don't want to get recorded student cloud yeah, so we are starting with the communities attack, uh meet our contributors blog meeting so till now uh we have uh collected responses uh from uh from folks, and uh we are done with our initial draft, uh for which, in the last meeting, we selected uh four for our folks, uh whose responses we want to mention in the first half, namely.

A

And uh we did uh culminate them in the uh final uh blog. So as for our earlier discussions, it was decided that we will put exactly what the responses were recorded uh in the passing form and you know again culminated by you guys in the form of individual blocks. So we did that. But uh today, uh like me and priyanka got some of the reviews, uh which importantly said that you know uh it would be better if we uh don't directly uh copy paste.

A

What has been said, rather than put it in the form of a storyline, uh so that it would be great from a reader's point of view. So this is the first thing I'll also mention it in the discussion part. So we need to work if anyone could volunteer for taking the notes. That would be better.

B

um I can do that yeah.

A

uh It's it's in the uh kubernetes blog series uh that the doc we are following it's in the very end of the first, like first round blog.

B

I'll just find out so I'm I'm I've joined from a new machine. Is this the same document that we yeah.

A

Yeah this, this is the same document just it's at the end of our first cycle, like if you go to the previous run, so you would find uh above that.

B

Got it got it? I I'll not note down that points. Thank you.

A

Yeah, so uh this this was the response that we got like you know. uh Many of them want us to uh put them up in the form of a storyline and for authenticity. uh They want us to mention a quote few of the lines said by the uh original contributor itself.

A

Also, uh another important point uh which was uh noted down was uh like the present uh contributors we are focusing on are more uh biased towards you know, seek, contributes or control like we see these folks more active in you know interacting with people or you know, uh you know sending messages regarding new contributors or helping out new contributors, and it is like no it's obvious that our choice of contributors would be biased towards this, because uh no, we are new to this and we have seen very few folks in this community, but since it's a large project with so much people, so there are people uh who are contributing to their doing core contributions and some of the other things which has been gone unnoticed by us, and uh we got the suggestion that we should also make our you know contributors list more diversified, so uh there are two ways to it.

A

Like I, I asked nikita for a list. She gave me a list of contributors uh which seemed but the more reliable one is the dev starts. So I will put the link of the dev stats in the docs itself. uh So uh what is dev stats? Is you know if you see about it, will give you an information about the contributors contributing to a particular cigar. You know as a whole from a particular region, so you will see a lot of names there uh which we didn't uh consider in this uh cycle.

A

So at present we need to you know, consider these names also uh so that the blog is uh completely like. The blog is completely of mixed opinion. So these are two points. First, we need to put in the form of a storyboard. Second, uh we need to uh get a set of contributors who have a like. You know, diversified background.

A

Also, there is one um third and uh I guess what was the I forward, wait this two and uh yeah. So, let's discuss on that. I was saying some point. Sorry uh pardon me. I forgot about that point. So yeah first is the story and the dev stats.

A

That's it that's the two things yes remind uh so uh the responses we got. uh There is a section for you know, suggestions for new contributors coming up so uh like there are a lot of folks that know uh when they were asked about how communities you know held them in their career graph or how communities helped them say. So they mentioned it.

A

You know this contribution would be a great help in resume building in cv building, uh so that was kind of you know not liked by a few other people, like the folks, are weren't just interested mentioning these things so like it basically fails the ethics of why this open source is working. It's a volunteer work, don't do it for cvs, you don't do it for resume, you do it because you like it or you like to contribute so that thing uh I'll give you more.

A

Maybe priyanka could give more clarification on that point, because even I am still a bit confused on that, but yeah now, overall, what I got from the reviews is this thing, but, uh most importantly, we want to put it in the form of the story and we need to put the things uh you know make. Our contributors based more diversified like get folks who are contributing to say, seek testing signal, securities, infra and all those which have gone unnoticed at this time by us. So that's it.

B

um Sorry, I am slow um hi. I just got access to the document, so I'll just not download the points in there.

B

um I, I am also catching up with all the updates, but I just had a quick look at the initial draft block draft and I also agree with the with the feedbacks we have received and- and we can definitely improve.

B

So I think the very first thing I see as an improvement is number one thing that uh deva just discussed that in in spite of having a separate uh like at the moment, correct me someone uh because I'm looking at a draft which is like one question and then there are four people and answers to each one of answers from each one of them under one question right. So uh I also feel we can make sections as in four section, but each section will be just one person will be.

B

It would be a paragraph related to just one person, so we can pick up the major the most so from the review. What I understood was uh and from the responses that I have read so far in close people. um It's true that most of the people have talked about their contributions, helping them to towards getting a job, uh getting a better resume, which is, which is a very common pattern.

B

We have seen across the responses, so this is something I think we also can't work on unless people, uh the upcoming responses we receive from people will have a different, different sort of answer, because otherwise it would be just us writing something on their behalf, I mean we can do something, but we can't, like literally write something on their behalf, so I think like on this thing, uh we would have to think about some more questions and and remove those questions that, like immediately, because in our in our current set of questionnaires, there are questions like this.

B

How it has helped you in your. I think the question is something like uh helped you in your career or or in your job or something like work or something so that that's a very direct question, and even I myself would answer something like that.

B

Only there that, yes, my contributions have helped me getting so and so job, or something like that. So I think we need to remove some questions there and make some add some more generic questions that let people answer in a more generic way, not just directly asking them like how it has helped them in their work, because seriously, I think that's the only answer I could think of okay. It helped me adding my open uh kubernetes contributions as open source experiences that eventually led me to get a job or something like that.

B

So I think that's something on our end only to improve and so yeah yeah. I think this is something we can take it as a to-do item to remove some of the very, very direct questions which ultimately lead people to answer in a in.

C

B

Certain way, which is not like, like the the pattern of answer, is not appropriate for a content like this, so that's that's. One of the feedback we receive. Another thing is, we might like just add some generic generic uh questions, rather than very specific. That would lead to a common pattern of answers so yeah. I think we need to work on some on the questions and um other than that.

B

uh Regarding the initial blog post, I haven't read the answers like whatever what what's the exact content that has gone into the answers at the moment, but I feel like for right now. There are four people and we can improve on this particular initial draft. I can help on it. What we can do is rather than having the section as one question and then answers under it will try to club all the answers from one person and make it one paragraph try to make it more a story like thing so then we can come up.

B

We can work on this particular block only and uh yeah try to improve it. The other thing I can see uh while in like in order to improve this one or as one of our other initial draft is there are some responses. I I don't. I won't name them because I do not recall the names properly, but I think there are some responses that which have like a diverse kind of uh answers. uh I'm not sure they are from india, but I think they are from different countries, but they have like some kind of answers.

B

I believe people would like to read rather than the same pattern, because what review feedback we have received, I think we are trying to avoid certain pattern or certain kind of answers, so we can maybe pick up more folks at for now uh and uh yeah. We can, we can come, we can discuss on it if we want to move towards that way, but I think there are some responses from new zealand and some from china. I think so we can pick up wherever we have the most responses, three or four.

B

We can try picking up those people and rather than doing what we are doing right now, we can take all their answers and make up one paragraph and make make it a story like thing and then we can again go through first, like our own review. Maybe we can run the draft through us all of us present here and then we can pass it to other people outside the group. So yeah, that's what I feel is there any other thing that I missed deva that you talked about or what we received as feedback.

A

No, no all these other things basically covering more diversified. Folks.

B

Yeah so yeah um I, I am not sure how it happened. That particular part that most of the forks that we picked up are from the con country backs or the docs dogs part only it was. It was a total coincidence because nobody was doing that intentionally. It was just like deva said we were aware of the people only or most of the folks that are present here are part of these groups. Only so that's perfectly fine.

B

I think that that just that was a coincidence, no one's mistake, so we can now consciously pick up people from different domains, and I think we have responses. It was like a coincidence, kind of thing. The four we picked up all of them were going uh contributes like the four that went into the uh initial draft. I think we have some responses uh from people who are contributing to other domains and the kubernetes project as well. We can try looking for them, otherwise I want to understand uh just just trying to get an update.

B

Are we reaching out to more people at the moment.

A

uh I guess for india we have reached out a lot of folks, but I will add a few names that I got from nikki. That would write a list gave me. There are a few name. Excuse me, there are few names that we missed out and we need to you know, uh connect with them. uh That's it. I guess.

B

A

Receiving from outside folks, like unverb, I guess would be working.

B

Okay, which is wonderful, actually uh and and so just want to understand about the names we have received from uh from the list today are old people from india region.

A

Yes, yes, like uh I have one other doubt, because if we are going to mix other, uh you know.

C

People from apac region.

A

So will that be a problem or not because.

B

A

Mentioned is about meet our contributors, blog series, india region, uh as this article.

B

No, uh I I was thinking like if, at the moment, we can't improve the initial draft just in case because of the pattern of the responses.

B

I am sorry I haven't really read the responses, but from the review and from the feedback that nikita and others provided us. I just understood that the responses might have some pattern. That is just going towards the resume principle building and the job part. So I am assuming those answers are in the initial draft.

B

So what I was saying was, if that those are the answers from the people, we really can't do anything we, we can just add some bits here and there, but we can change our answer so just in case, if that is a like as a whole, that is the pattern only. What we can do is like try to focus on a different region at the moment. Unless we get responses which have a diverse answer set or we, then we can club some people which who, who are already in the first draft.

B

We can pick up like couple of them couple of those folks and add some other folks from different uh who are who are contributing to different domains and kubernetes project in india region itself. So I was saying like at the moment uh we can look at the whatever responses we have received and if we have enough like three or four responses from different region as well and those look like diversified responses, we can just do the same thing on those responses.

B

A

Okay, so I guess we have enough responses, uh like uh I guess uh at present, uh we have responses from people from india who are not part of contributes mail like I could see. We have response from aditi.

A

uh We have response from, we don't have response, but uh let's reach out ours will be also sending out uh his home, as I said today, and let's check out few other responses and see if no um there are like. You know, people from diversified background in india, because you have collected a lot of responsibility, yeah.

B

Just just want to ask how many responses we have received at the moment. I think we can stop reaching out to people and we start working on the responses itself. If, if we have received a lot at the moment, a lot means some uh 30 40 responses.

B

A

B

We have received uh over multiple regions. I think we.

A

B

I think we can stop uh reaching out until the next meeting, which will be bi-weekly so after next to next week. I think, during this time we can stop reaching out to people. We can discuss based on what's our progress over these two weeks uh from today and based on that, we can resume this thing like what kind of not what kind of like uh in what domain. We want responses, so we want. We are looking for contributors in one domain exactly because the problem here is.

B

We do not want to focus on one particular part of the kubernetes project. That was another feedback, so uh we can try making batches of people now uh based on different contribution domains in the project in from particular region. uh Do you want to before? We can do that on the on on this meeting itself, maybe quickly, but anyone has any question.

B

I see one suggestion from one above so he says, dividing the regions based on countries may cause difficulties with smaller countries where it may be difficult to find number of contributors to even do one blog. I propose we club countries into these sub regions- east asia.

B

B

Sorry, I do not understand which country fall into this particular thing, but I think that sounds like a good way of doing that.

A

uh Yeah also uh vedant uh yeah. We don't raise this issue with me. Also like there are some negative responses from some contributors. I don't think they were like at present context. uh There was a contributor who, uh whose response I don't remember, the name vedant. Could you please share the response? Please.

B

I think we do not want to talk names there, because that's.

A

Right, yeah, yeah, yeah, okay, cool, so leave it. So there were some. uh There was a fork who, like you know who uh mentioned that uh he didn't like a particular part of kubernetes, and I think that was in past tense. He was talking about.

B

Previous things,.

A

But at present, but he didn't mention anything about that present. So you know initially, when you read it, you read it like. Okay is that the problem, because I, uh when I read it it felt like I should raise this with paris and all, but then I gave it a read again and I felt that it was in a previous sense, so he was talking about past days. uh I.

B

Think I thought.

A

Sorry sorry go ahead, go ahead! No.

B

A

Saying we could, just you know, uh ignore those things and.

B

Because I don't.

A

See those uh problems at present arising uh for any of the folks on even in contributes, uh we don't uh see such problems.

B

Yeah, based on the feedback, what I understood is we really have to go and filter out the responses which means, even though we are reaching out to 10 people based on what what responses we have received, we have to decide whether we want to write about them or not.

B

I do not know whether we should do it or not, but I think that's what I understood based on uh the feedback that, if even.

C

B

Like again, if we are getting repetitive answers, we would not want to write the repetitive answers in in a single blog for a single region, so there might be some chances that we would have to now leave some of the responses and not not post them at all. For now, at least so uh that's one filter. We have to do now. Another thing is like we are asking them for their responses. We can't like tell them. Oh you can't say wrong.

B

You can't share your bad experiences, but we can just work on that like take that as a feedback, and maybe if we know uh there are people who could help them. If they really need some help, then we can reach out to other people who could help them, otherwise just leave it for now, because we really can't do anything yeah, because we we are our work at the moment is it should be clear.

B

We are just here to write the blog and if we like, try to read the content and then work on like take an action on based on what is written there and deciding our action based on what is written, that that's not our work, because otherwise that would be load of distraction.

B

So yeah, like deva, said we just have to ignore those things, if the something that can't so here we have to decide. If I am writing something like that, and I am putting that on a public portal, it is going to not help them only so if you think something.

B

Some answer is like that that putting that on a public portal is not going to help them not going to help anyone not going to help the project just just leave that line only if you feel there are five answers, and one of them is like that. Just use the four other four answers uh or if, if there are like five answers and three of them like uh like that, then the only thing we can do is just leave that particular response and move on to the other one. So yeah.

B

We can we can do our work like this like this time. What I have understood is we do not. uh The questionnaire was just to take some idea about a story from for a contributor. We really do not have to write everything that what whatever we have received, we can pick up stuff from from what we have received and make a four to five line.

B

Paragraph from that, that's I think, that's what we should do now, based on the feedback, so yeah, if, if part of that, which is very small, is negative, something some not negative, some uh different way constructive feedback, then we can just leave that yeah and that that, if you do not like, if by yourself, you are not able to understand that something is like that, just put it in the draft and run it through people.

B

First in our group only and a couple of people can help you decide whether this something should be removed, or this something should stay or something like that. Yeah. uh There are more uh suggestions so puneshwar. He says I have a small suggestion about reaching out to folks. There are some content creators out there on youtube, who have put out amazing content on cloud native kubernetes stuff. Should we try to scheme out such people?

B

Maybe uh I I I just correct me, someone, I think, those all of those folks um not all, but most of those folks again fall under the contrary, back so the which is which is communication, and that so I might be wrong.

B

But again we are moving to this particular domain only where or we already have received abundant of the responses so for now uh like that was a very good suggestion, very, very, very good suggestion, but we are trying to look forward to more diversified uh responses now, and I I think most of them are from the con communication or the marketing group only if I'm right.

A

Yeah yeah, that's that's absolutely right. We don't want uh more contrib like uh communication folks, because that is not going to help many because there's a large project. There are a lot of parts and.

B

Also also, this is personal opinion. uh What we are trying I mean. What I was thinking when I was thinking of getting some responses from people is to help people who do not have any appearance or do not have any currently do not have any any any any previous content, which is their experience so most of these youtubers from the community who are sharing the content and doing wonderful work, but they already have a platform to represent themselves.

B

I think we can for now focus on people who are doing wonderfully like who are very highly contributing to the project, but have never been represented on any public platform um about their experiences, so we can maybe first focus on those folks, that's personal opinion. Yeah.

A

No, it's absolutely correct, also like we need to focus on that now. Let's, like I guess, we have a few minutes left. So, let's discuss on how we are going to put the final blog in the form of storyboards as blank. I said like we need to put only one contributor's response under one section uh part of that contributors response. So I have one suggestion here uh we will like. We have a lot of responses from india, let's not just concentrate on four or five folks.

A

Let's let us take india as a whole check uh run through all the responses we have received uh and the individual blogs has been written, so anyone could uh go through them and see which part seems more interesting or which part seems like you know. It should be mentioned in the blog and put that part under a particular section like now. The broader subsection is already there uh just. We need to omit those questions and just concentrate on the broader subsections, which we also discussed in the last meeting.

A

So under this broader subsection switch, like you know, uh first of all, the backgrounds we discussed and how did they get started?

A

Experience as a contributor and suggestion mostly this, these are the uh four things that we wanted to concentrate and then there are, you know, questions uh under each section I put because it will be easier for us while we compile so last thing we had planned was we will mention each and everything we are not going to get anything, but that is not the scenario now we will mention the best responses that we've got and the diversified like if we are getting a response on career building or cv from one of the person, and we are getting the same response from another person, then we will consider uh the best response.

A

You know the response that is well elaborate and we feel like it should be mentioned, so we will mention only one person's uh response and omit the other one. So, similarly, uh on that same line, if you want, then we will get a diversified form of blog writing. uh So I guess this makes no, no something clear for us. You know some to do work. How we are getting like we're running.

A

We will go through all the blogs, individual blogs and pick up an important part which we feel should be mentioned in the blog and mention it under that particular subsection, and then we could uh priyanka could run through it and do the final edits there itself.

B

Deva I just want to know how much time we have in the meeting- or we already have our past the time.

A

I guess it's a one-hour meeting or something like that.

B

It's a one-hour meeting, so we have 30 20, 28 minutes. Okay, I was thinking okay, uh we will we can in the end or somewhere when we everyone is. Okay is done with the discussion. We can maybe stop, recording and share our screen with all the responses that we have received and we can collectively go through like have a skim reading through all of the responses and decide. Okay out of these indian india responses we have received, we are picking up this.

B

This is so everyone will be included in the decision like who we are picking up, and uh one thing I I want to suggest now is rather than the individuals picking up who they want to write about. We can do. Is we pick up, say five people out of ten responses. We have received say from india. uh We can uh if people can say okay, if folks in our group can uh share their interest if they want to write the blog and they can, we can assign them right.

B

That would be easy to for us to uh understand as well that okay, these five are priority. At the moment. We need to write about them because these are going in a block, and uh that would be easy rather than people picking up, because then there are some people who will always be left because for some reason there is no one uh at the moment feeling like writing about them. So what I am thinking is after, like one month, we are done with our discussion. We can stop, recording and collectively go through that.

B

If that sounds fine so before we do that, anyone like who want to unmute themselves- because I was not around- but maybe there might be some uh discussions that have happened over last week. Anybody wants to talk about them or anything. You have as a query.

B

I think purneshwar has one question so he's asking: is the final draft edit open to all? Is it so anyone can yet yeah it's open door.

B

He is asking how about taking some part of a particular response in place of doing a summary for a hole. I I think I do not understand it properly. Deva you understand, it may be avinesh. You want to uh elaborate more on this.

A

uh Yeah, I I mean we were discussing about uh going. You know the responses are quite repetitive, so what we can do is we can just pick some part. That is quite interesting, and that is not been mentioned in other responses, and just put that, as a I mean as a part of a particular person's blog in place of summarizing, the whole uh response of that particular person.

B

Yeah yeah exactly, I think, that's the idea from now onwards that we, I think we have nine questions right, nine or more than nine questions at the moment in the questionnaire and two of them are something that people have left a blank as well. So seven we can say people have most people have failed. So out of seven we can say them just on an average good responses will will find four appropriate responses four to five, so we can use four to five.

B

Only so yeah, like an avinesh said we do not have to summarize all of the content that have we have received as part of the response uh based on our own understanding. We can like whoever is, has picked the responsibility to write a block for a particular person write a section for a particular person. They can decide based on their own understanding that, okay out of the seven uh answers these five look more interesting.

B

I am going to write my paragraph around these five answers and uh yeah yeah and, and once we have, we will have all five sections so say we are focusing on five people in a particular block just saying so once we will have all five sections, the blog sections. uh You know in one draft we can see. Oh there there are still common patterns, so we can remove that during our our internal run of the review.

A

Yeah, this is good. Now we could go with this. uh Just to add into the question: uh are we going to give an introduction to the uh the contributors.

A

Sorry didn't get you introduction to the contributors or to the blog, no, no, not as a blog, the uh suppose, uh uh exp. We are writing a blog on an x person. So are we going to give an introduction to that x person or we're just gonna uh talk about the experience or something the questions? I.

B

Think say: oh sorry, they were, you can go ahead.

C

And go forward okay, so.

B

C

Was thinking like a.

B

Couple of the the first first two question we have is the name of the person as well as what they are currently doing, and most of them have uh also pointed out which part of the kubernetes project they have majorly contributed. So we can just club. These three part of the answer is in one line saying: uh okay, some xyz person is currently working at this thing or is a student majorly involved in this part of the kubernetes project. That could be a simple introduction. I feel that would give them okay.

B

They are uh professionally or working academically, currently working at this place and involved in this part of the kubernetes project yeah. I think that would be a simple introduction to start with. Yes,.

A

Like uh just you know, name of the company and uh the the text id like the the sig, they are involved with this. These three things are, you know, I guess enough for a person's introduction like we could if we quote any person's uh response like for authenticity, we just mentioned that, and also I guess uh we we will mention uh in the end of the vlog or somewhere in the blog at the beginning, that these people from these people we have collected response.

A

Maybe we could, you know, write the company name and the sinks they are involved with in there itself.

B

Sorry, I didn't understand the last part. Could you please repeat.

A

Is it not a requirement to uh mention all the persons uh who are whose response we are writing in the blog like? Is it if it is.

B

I think that's a very good thing, because that would involve everyone who has contributed to it um yeah. I think we can work on that particular part, because that would really be a way to thank people for their time because they have taken out time so yeah. I think that part we can discuss on that I'll. Take take it as a note in my diary and put that in the discussion page uh but yeah. That's something thank you for pointing it out.

A

Yeah, so that's done now, yeah now broadly, I need to focus more on that a final blog because, time and again uh folks come with questions on that part. We are doing it as a storyboard, and now we don't need to focus on all the responses pick out, only specific responses which you like and mention it in the final block, and we are not uh specific about the contributors this time, not no, four, no five, all the contributors from the indian region, all the responses we are having.

A

Now we are going through them and picking out things so uh about assigning the things that for priyanka said. If you could make it more clear, then it would be better same people working on this.

B

Yeah, so uh it would be voluntary thing right. We we on the call after this once we are done, we will stop the recording, we'll pick up, say five from india region. Then anyone from from the call can pick up. Okay, uh these are the five you can say. I am picking this picking this right, uh or we will just put uh put a uh summary to this. Today's call in the chat that okay, these are the people or or we can link it to the document that and document document.

B

We can make a point that okay, these are the five people we have picked up and we are moving forward to add their responses in the initial document, so it would be just voluntary pickup like if say, anub pick up, one vedan pick up one once we are done. We are done uh just pick it up yourself, but that's it. I mean my idea was not to assign it, but just pick it up do not like. I want to pick. I know also like this time.

B

Let's just uh stay like one person, one response, so everyone will get a chance to write it as well yeah. That was also one of the internal feedbacks we received that we need to involve everyone who is interested.

A

Yes, so uh I guess we are good to stop the recording and start like. Is there anything else you guys.

B

Want to discuss yeah avinesh has a point, so he's mentioned that we have some folks missing in the meet yeah for, for the same reason, uh we'll try to not only pick up people from india region at the moment. We'll also pick responses from different regions as well. We will not just prioritize a blog for that, so people who are missing at the moment. uh It's just it's just a time thing right. They can pick up responses later on for for different people right.

A

Yeah also, we will put like uh the nodes. We have summarized everything we discussed. We will put it in the slack thread, so everyone knows what we have discussed.

A

Okay, I guess that's it and we could stop the recording or is there anything else anyone wants to.

C

Yeah suggestion so, basically, uh since I joined late and they saw the folks who have wrote the blogs earlier, I saw that, like some of them wrote it in a single paragraph. Like all the points they just wrote it down in a single paragraph, some divided it into the type of the questions it was in in the questionnaire.

C

So I guess uh if we uh just lay out a particular template like for each question, uh then under each question a folks can have their answer written in a story, type of thing so that when you are making the final draft, it will be easier to pick up the ques to see which answers relate to which questions and see which points are distinct out of them, so that in the final draft it will be easier to put up the point. I think you're getting there.

A

Yeah, but I guess that requirement is over now, because we are not writing everything. We are not noting every responses. We will only pick up the responses that you feel is important or you feel is interesting.

C

About the individual, yes,.

B

C

Think I can uh clarify a little.

B

Bit on it, because what I.

B

The end when we are the draft we will know like this answer is is in response to this particular question. So the the way we are going to write the stories right now is there will be no question. We are just uh assuming that the responses we have received to the questions are the uh are some of the bits and pieces we have received as uh some something to to write a story around right.

B

So there is no particular set of questions we are going to answer or we are going to like the the major major uh as a whole. The blog won't answer particular set of question. It will be just story around one particular contributor, so now uh it doesn't matter if, if one person's responses are answering to all the questions, it's just whatever we found most interesting, most appropriate to the requirements from a person's responses. We are going to collect them, make them uh like format them in a manner it.

B

So it's looks like more of a story kind of thing and then put that as a section in the blog yeah. That's the idea now, so we are just trying to sideline from the question answer thing based on the feedback and the review we received from people.

A

Yeah anything else I know ahvanesh, you wanted to say something. You raised your hand uh yeah I mentioned in the chat itself, uh but yeah uh priyanka. You just mentioned about the story kind of thing. So, uh if you're gonna pick uh some part of a response, I don't think we won't be able to give a good story. uh The good connectivity among the uh the thing, the response, uh can you just more elaborate? What story is according to you.

B

uh Yeah, so it's it's gone, so that is some work at the writers part who is going to write the section, so they just have to look at all the responses like there are five answers, somehow club them in a manner that it looks like a connected story, so it doesn't have to be a story like a story thing, but it should start like. Okay, we are talking about this person and then from fl moving from this particular line. That sounds like connected and then from this particular section to this.

B

So it's it has to be a flowing thing, but there is right now, no particular way to explain. Okay, this is the kind of story we are trying to look at. That will be something maybe we can understand after a couple of runs through through reviews uh when we actually write the responses or the sections in a story manner, but that's something a creativity part on the blog on the writers or the author uh authors part at the moment who will be picking up the writing part.

B

So yeah, that's something we have to decide, but that will entirely revolve around what kind of responses uh we have received from a certain person yeah. So the story can be anything.

A

Yeah, like it's.

B

Just writing you.

C

C

Like yesterday only so I was thinking to paraphrase some sentences, but uh in that I ran into something like uh maybe when uh one of the contributors will be reading his blog or his part of the story. Maybe so he might be thinking that I didn't say this code and they use this quote. So maybe that can be a little bit uh problematic.

C

I don't know yeah.

B

I think we got a green signal on this particular part, so this was. This was the same concern. I think deva raised to the people who provided us the feedback that we do earlier earlier. We had decided not to like intentionally decided not to use any words any sentences from our own and and just use their words exactly so people just have said they do not like it. They're.

C

B

The simple uh just was this: they do not like it the way it was written, and so they want us to just format in a proper manner. So right now, I think that's something that's something that has come from the reviewers only so we can do that. Now we can try to mold the we'll try to be honest with the people we'll try our best but yeah. We can little bit more the sentences to to make them sound, better or look better yeah, and also, I just want to say it again.

B

The story that particular word was wrong. I do not know who picked that up or from where it's just more.

C

Of like collecting.

B

Yeah, paraphrasing paraphrasing the content, so it's more interesting to read: yeah yeah.

A

Yes, yeah exactly, I was saying that previously, like the story part don't get confused, you have to make a storyboard or something I'll remove it from the notes. Also, it's, like paraphrase it in a better manner: okay, change the sentences. If you don't like change, if you, if you feel the response, is pulled some sometimes you read a sentence and you feel like it's cool okay, so we know how to make it sound good, so just make it sound good. Just don't change the meaning.

A

If someone is saying humanity is good, we we don't change the meaning that humanities is bad, but if someone is saying cuban, it is is better than average. We can make it sound like. Okay, kubernetes is good, so.

B

A

You can choose to.

B

Avoid that line only if you do.

C

A

Want to do anything around that yeah.

A

So I guess a lot of discussion we had so for now what priyanka said he could go through the individual part. I am just stopping the recording.