►
From YouTube: Kubernetes SIG Multicluster 2021 Sep 21
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
What's
up
not
too
much,
what's
up
with
you,
chillin
hanging
with
a
dog.
A
I
really
don't
mind
like
the
cleaning.
I
love
the
way
it
feels
after
you
know
so
yeah.
I
can
see
that
yeah,
the
secret
is
you
got
to
get
the
cavitron.
A
Ultrasonic,
like
water,
cleaner
thing.
C
A
B
D
Extra
teeth:
where
are
you
going
to
get
that.
A
All
right,
it's
three
past
clocks,
ticking,
laura.
I
think
you
have,
I
think,
you're
very
dominant
on
the
agenda
today.
Why
don't
you
I
know
you've
got
a
deck.
Let
me
make
sure
you
can
share.
A
B
And
I
feel
like
I'm
kind
of
laggy,
so
sorry
in
advance,
if
I
talk
over
somebody
by
accident
but
wanted
to
give
a
few
updates
on
the
multi-cluster
dns
and
cluster
property,
as
always
so
multi-cluster
dns.
We
talked
about
this
a
little
bit
ago
at
our
last
meeting
in
end
of
august,
but
have
been
discussing
on
the
pr
with
sig
network.
Last
time
we
had.
B
I
had
mentioned
that
we
are
discussing
ptr
records
specifically,
so
we
talked
about
it
then,
but
just
confirming
that
we're
going
forward
with
not
requiring
ptr
records
for
multi-cluster
dns
and
the
other
thing.
That's
the
other
top
theme
kind
of
coming
off.
Of
that
pr
right
now
is
also
some
scale
concerns,
so
possibly
multi-cluster
dns
records
could
be
really
big
full
of
many
ips.
B
So
there
is
some
limits
that
we,
you
know
generally
know
about.
So
there's
some
conversation
going
on
there
about
sort
of
what
our
obligation
is
to
have
those
limits
explicitly
laid
out
or
mentioned
or
caveated
or
have
automated
scale
tests,
or
you
know
what
the
gamut
is
for
that
so
that's
being
discussed
over
there.
I'm
definitely
feeling
a
caveat
needs
to
go
on
it
somewhere
about
what
your
dns
server
actually
needs
to
be.
B
If
you're
going
to
have
like
a
huge
cluster
set,
and
the
other
thing
is
I'm
still
looking
for
collabs
for
a
core
dns
plugin.
I
have
heard
from
a
couple
people
and
we're
not
super
organized
yet,
but
I
do
want
to
be
more
organized
about
that.
This
is
to
make
a
reference
implementation
for
mcsdns.
This
is
one
of
the
blockers
for
the
mcs
api.
B
So,
if
you're
interested,
let
me
know
you
can
just
dm
me
on
slack
or
send
a
carrier
pigeon
or
whatever
you
want
say.
I
had
a
couple
teeth,
send
a
couple
teeth.
I
will
be
giving
them
to
paul
for
his
future
project,
but
it
really
all
helps
the
multicluster
so
yeah
and
then
for
cluster
property.
So.
B
Okay,
yeah
that
actually
sounds
pretty
good
yeah.
I
don't
think
we
need
to
workshop
that
any
one
bit
more
okay,
so
pausing
pausing
for
teeth
or
multi-cluster
dns
update
related
comments.
B
Cool
okay,
I
just
know
I
have
a
little
lag
here,
so
I
don't
want
to
talk
over
anybody
all
right,
cluster
property.
So
last
we
talked
back
in
on
june,
8th,
there's
effort
underway
as
a
spin-off
from
sig
arch
to
do
to
propose
or
design
some
better
crd,
bootstrapping
and
even
more
historically
there's
this
to
crd
or
not
to
crd
section
in
the
cluster
id
cap.
B
But
we
considered
this
effort
to
be
a
strong
signal
for
us
to
multi-cluster
be
comfortable
deciding
that
cluster
property
should
be
a
c
or
d,
because
if
there's
future
good
crd
bootstrapping
we're
cool
being
a
crd.
However,
I'm
pretty
sure
that
that
effort
has
gotten
stuck.
I've
been
pinging
a
little
bit,
often
on
the
past
couple
of
months
really,
but
there
hasn't
been
a
ton
of
effort
forward.
B
For
me,
I
think
it's
good
to
keep
continuing
on
the
path
of
cluster
property
should
be
a
should
be
a
crd,
even
without
any
known
plans
or
proposals
of
improved
bootstrapping,
and
not
to
get
super
too
sidetracked
by
that.
But
I
know
that
this
has
you
know
some
different
opinions.
We
talked
about
a
couple
times,
so
I
just
wanted
to
bring
up
that.
This
is
where
it's
kind
of
landed
right
now
and
I
see
paul,
has
a
hand,
so
I
will
call
him
paul.
A
Yeah,
I
I
personally
think
it.
It
makes
a
lot
of
sense
to
continue
with
it.
As
a
crd,
I
am
not
especially
surprised
at
the
idea
that
maybe
you
know
the
effort
may
have
gotten
stuck.
A
I
think
that
you
know
we
can
talk
offline
about
like
can
we
do
anything
to
help
unstick
that,
but,
like
I
personally
always
expected
that
to
be
like
a
longer
arc
than
a
much
longer
arc
than
it
would
be
to
just
write
down
cluster
properties
crd,
so
I
don't
think
the
equation
changes
much
for
me.
Eof.
D
Yeah,
really
big,
plus
one
to
that,
I
think
like
getting
it
in
kk
is
we've
had
a
lot
of
friction.
I
think
crd
is
great.
We
can
move
forward
with
it.
It
solves
a
lot
of
problems
right
now,
and
presumably
there
will
at
some
point
be
a
better
bootstrapping
mechanism
for
crds.
As
we
move
more
things
to
crds,
I
don't.
I
don't
know
that
it
makes
sense
for
this
to
be
the
effort
that
drives
that
yeah.
A
There
are
other
other
use
cases
that
are
much
like
higher
higher
gravity
for
crds
and
kk.
I
think
so
we
don't.
We
don't
need
to
like
block
on
that.
D
D
On
cluster
property
and
the
cluster
id
to
do
things,
and
now
it's
and
we
have
a
whole
bunch
of
folks
in
the
community
saying
hey
this
is
this
is
really
critical.
This
needs
to
be
bootstrapped
with
my
cluster,
then
you
know
that
would
then
make
us
a
good
driver
right
now.
We're
we're
driving
on
theory.
B
So
I
like
this
cool
gotcha
yeah.
I
think
this
isn't
too
materially
at
the
deviation
of
what
we
talked
about
before,
but
I
just
wanted
to
give
the
update
and
open
the
floor
a
little
bit
again
cool
well
other
than
that.
Oh,
I
did
want
to
say
thank
you
to
everybody
who
came
for
steven
and
I's
recording
a
couple
weeks
ago.
We
got
that
all
edited
and
submitted
kubecon
is
going
to
be
the
bomb
for
mcs
api,
so
yay,
and
I
think
that's
pretty
much
all
of
my
updates.
B
I
apologize
for
my
lack
of
slides
I'll
make
sure
to
always
have
them
in
my
back
pocket.
We
like
your
slides,
laura
good
good
and
my
diagrams
of
squares
with
other
squares
in
them,
always
good.
Those.
A
A
Maybe
this
is
a
good
opportunity
for
us
to
just
like
surface
into
this
chat
that
we
have
sig,
multi-cluster,
intro
and
deep
dive
at
cubecon.
Laura's
already
mentioned
that
she
and
steven
have
a
talk
at
kubecon.
Also
I
I
will
be
there
virtually
I'll,
just
be
bringing
a
toothbrush
and
an
extension
cord,
but
I
think
that
laura
you
said
that
you'll
be
there
irl
right.
D
A
All
right
sounds
like
we
maybe
talked
through
for
the
day,
but
I'll
just
also
call
out.
You
know,
like
we'd,
love,
to
hear
what
folks
are
doing.
Not
not
every
part
of
this
sig's
life
needs
to
be
focused
on
like
efforts
by
the
sig.
If
you
have
an
interesting
project
you
want
to
share
with
us,
I
would
personally
love
to
hear
more
about
it
or
love
to
hear
about
it.
Feel
free.
You
know
to
like
put
stuff
on
the
agenda
and
show
us
show
us
what
you
got.