►
From YouTube: Meshery Development Meeting (May 6th, 2020)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
B
C
B
B
And
so,
just
as
soon
as
a
few
others
join
okay,
very
good,
all
right,
yeah
I'm
still
so
it
is
posh
and
some
of
the
other
members
here
can
tell
you
just
how
good
my
my
tamil
actually
is.
It's
you
you'd,
be
amazed.
It's
pretty
pretty
well
refined,
okay,
bad
bad
joke,
I,
yeah,
yep
yep.
So
for
me,
just
as
we
actually
look
at
looking
through
the
chat
here,
sorry
I
think
I'm
doing
kind
of
a
monologue.
But
but
looking
at
the
chat
and
watching
some
new
folks
come
in
is
fantastic.
B
B
B
Okay,
hopefully
he
comes
back
but
palasa.
If
you're
in
a
position
to
to
have
audio
or
video,
it
would
be
fantastic
to
have
you
introduced,
you
can't
get
get
familiar
with
folks
and
if
you
can't
I
told
you
understand,
there's
a
number
of
you
to
join
that
just
aren't
in
a
good
situation
to
do
that.
So.
B
So
we've
got
about
about
a
minute
left.
The
Nash
is
here
with
us
as
well
as
Pelorus,
which
is
fantastic.
A
couple
of
new
new
faces,
some
faces
that
are
starting
to
get
old
and
it
may
be
wrinkled
at
this
point,
so
new
Titian
I'm,
looking
at
you
as
as
starting
to
be
an
old-timer
at
this
point,
Letitia
I
owe
you
a
couple.
A
small
chat,
I
think
which
is
yeah
on
the
to-do
list,
so
we
will
get
there
yeah.
A
B
Also,
at
some
point
gets
so
annoyed
with
how
it
is
that
Google
meat
is
set
up
and
how
many
of
you
I
have
to
admit
to
the
call.
That
is
not
the
situation
we
want
to
be
in
so
at
some
point
we'll
just
we
just
I
guess
go
the
route
that
everyone
else
in
the
world
is
gone
and
that's
to
go
to
zoom,
I,
guess,
I!
B
Think
some
of
you
know,
we've
been
fortunate
enough
to
CN.
Cf
has
given
us
a
zoom
account,
so
we
can
go
use
that
when
we
do,
that
might
even
save
me
a
small
administrative
step,
which
is
it's
been
nicely
groupable
meat
has
recently
given
the
ability
to
record
meetings,
2g,
sweet
customers
who
are
on
the
business
plan,
not
the
enterprise
plan.
So
that
saved
me
some
manual
steps,
but
even
at
that,
after
this
call,
I've
got
to
go
upload,
the
recording
with
zoom.
We
might
just
do
a
live
stream
to
YouTube.
B
So
having
said
that,
for
those
that
are
here
fresh,
do
you
know
that
we
record
the
calls
and
post
them
on
YouTube?
So
so
you
know
use
your
words
as
you
will
to
move
past
this
very
briefly
pelage.
It
was
just
asking
some
questions
about
me
and
a
community.
So
a
couple
of
quick
words
yeah,
I'm,
maybe
the
only
one
on
the
call
it
that
oh,
no,
no,
no
Tish.
B
A
A
C
C
B
Hopefully,
google
season
of
Docs
we'll
see
if
that
goes
through,
but
the
google
Summer
of
Code
selections
were
just
announced,
and
so
there's
so
it's
auger
is
here,
participating
as
mentor
so
and
so
we'll
talk
more
about
the
programs
and
and
the
individual
interns
that
are
there
and
what
objectives
we
have,
whether
you're
a
mentor
or
or
an
intern
on
those
projects
it
doesn't
matter.
Those
are
large
projects
that
we
will
describe
on
Friday
and
all
of
you
are
welcome
to
participate
if
they
strike
your
fancy.
B
D
Sir,
actually,
sir
I'm
working
on
one
one
issue
that
is
set
up,
prettier,
that
is
in
layer
five
so
said,
I
have
a
doubt.
I
am
working
on
this,
so
I
have
a
doubt.
So
do
I
need
to
make
any
comment
like
like
we
have
make
side
or
something
like
I'm
thinking
about
making
a
comment
like
make
taste
or
make
code
or
something
which
is
when
I
done
make
put.
Also
it
will
take
the
lincoler
and
it
will
automatically
fix
so
this
app,
which
is
the
character,
should
I
think
about.
B
D
Sir
I
said
I'm
talking
about
the
layer,
type
layer,
type
people
so
there's
a
issue
called
set
up.
Speed
here
and
I
go
to
some
YouTube
videos
and
I
came
to
know
that
there's
guillotine
and
PDF
if
the
good
for
the
our
project
and
so
should
I
make
any
comment
like
make
put
to
check
or
which
is
all
those
issues
and
make
it
to
automatically
correct.
B
This
is
bad
Adina's
here,
because
this
particular
topic
is
has
knew
a
little
bit
with
continuous
integration.
A
you
had
recently
gone
through
the
layer,
five
site
and
run
prettier
as
a
way
of
formatting
and
structuring
a
lot
of
the
HTML
that
was
otherwise
and
individual
documents
kind
of
strung
together,
and
it
was
fairly
hard
to
read,
and
so
since
he
had
run
it
as
a
one-time
operation,
the
thought
was,
there
was
a
suggestion
that
maybe
we
should
incorporate
that
into
the
building.
B
It's
currently
a
Jekyll
based
static
content
site
that
is
hosted
off
of
github
pages
free
the
build,
if
you
will
really
happens
by
github
itself,
and
so
your
to
me.
Your
suggestion
about
having
prettier
as
a
utility
built
in
to
make
command
or
the
make
file
of
the
LEAs
developers
would
run
every
time
that
we're
building
and
develop
building
the
site
locally.
E
B
B
Normally
people
run
a
site
command
which
in
turn
just
runs
this
string
of
commands
and
flags
for
checker
the
nice
thing
about
doing
running
it
locally.
Is
it's
pretty
pretty
it's
pretty
fast
to
rebuild,
and
with
is
the
live,
reload
flag?
Every
time
you
make
a
change
in
HTML
Italy,
your
browser,
Jekyll
will
rebuild
itself
and
your
browser
will
reload,
which
makes
development
kind
of
quick
now
Gunjan,
as
you
consider
potentially
incorporating
prettier
as
a
utility
that
would
be
invoked.
I
am
a
command.
C
B
D
Said
I
I'd
dyed
it,
but
it
does
possible
but
I,
don't
think
of
my
colleague,
capitis
good,
so
actually
I.
Think
I
should
ask
you.
First,
oh
yeah.
B
You
know
I
haven't
I,
haven't
run
for
here.
Just
yet
so
yeah
I
couldn't
say.
Does
anyone
else
on
the
call,
I
guess
with
two
things
like
one
have
an
opinion
about
who
the
items
being
incorporated
into
the
main
like
like
it
seems
like
we
that
that
might
be
a
utility
we
might
run
under
a
bill
coming
and
maybe
not
under
may
excite?
Is
anyone
that's
one
question
the
other
one
is.
Does
anyone
know
if
we
can
augment?
You
know
these
build
process
to
include
something
like
prettier
I.
E
Don't
know
if
it's
possible
to
augment
their
build
process.
I've
used
some
Jekyll
sites
in
the
past
and
I.
Don't
believe
that
it
is
I.
Do
use
prettier
locally
in
development,
at
least
through
my
IDE,
and
so
it's
helpful
there
in
keeping
code
formatted
cleanly-
and
you
know
as
I'm
writing
it's
when
I
save
it'll
go
and
format
and
set
things
up,
I
find
it
helpful
there
I
don't
know
that
it
would
have
a
lot
of
value,
at
least
from
my
perspective,
in
the
build
process.
E
Since
that's
after
the
codes
already
committed
in
the
repo
and
once
it's
online
people
are
seeing
the
generated
version
anyhow,
so
it
seems
like
either
something
that
would
be
like
a
recommit
check.
If
you're
using
that
you
know
software,
that
pre-commit
requires
prettier
to
be
reporting.
You
know
a
good
state
where,
before
you
commit
the
code
or
you
just
kind
of
by
convention,
people
who
are
developing
or
using
that
in
their
IEDs
that
everyone
has
a
relatively
consistent
output,
I.
F
Have
David
actually
and
yes,
it
will
be?
Yes,
it
could
be
best
if
we
have
JPL
as
a
comic
book
and
and
it
just
checked
when
committing
it,
just
takes
it.
If
all
the
files
of
it
formatted
and
I
guess,
maybe
we
can
give
them
if
they
give
their
delaford
a
warning
that
the
Python
of
it
I'm
not
35
in
a
fight,
then
another
idea.
B
The
only
thing
that
I've
seen
so
it's
just
to
comment
on
like
the
ability
to
affect
how
it
is
that
github
will
know.
Github
pages
will
build
Jekyll
Sciences
that
one
I
would
acknowledge
that
there's
been
a
time
or
two
where
I
tried
to
use
a
gem
or
a
particular
theme,
or
something
and
I've
gotten
hung
up
on
the
notion
there.
As
as
a
concession
user
of
get
up
ages,
I
didn't
have
full
control
there.
B
F
B
B
B
Well,
a
set,
you
know
you
can
go
in
and
control
your
you
could
protect
your
branches,
so
this
isn't
unique
to
Mary
Dyer,
but
just
sort
of
as
an
example
of
things
like
Blake
was
talking
on.
The
Bob
like
was
talking
about
I.
Think,
like
a
I,
don't
know
that
you
said
pre-commit
hook,
Blake,
but
but
yeah.
E
I
did
pre
commits
a
software
that
then
allows
you
to
define
different
hooks,
that
you
can
run
checks
prior
to
actually
committing
things
and
to
get
so
you
go
run.
Git
commit
and
pre-commit
behind
the
scenes
will
run
a
number
of
checks
that
you
define
and
then,
if
all
those
pass
that
commit
will
actually
go
through.
So
that's
another
thing
that
you
have
to
use
in
your
repo.
B
B
So
this
is
what
I
was
thinking
of
earlier
when
I
was
saying,
like
I
haven't
seen
many
places
where
you
can
modify
how
it
is,
the
github
pages
is
doing
its
thing,
but
I
guess
this
isn't
really
modifying
anything
other
than
just
kind
of
enforcing
that
any
you
know
any
PRS
that
you
have
against
the
particular
branch.
Are
you
know
that
that
this
build
action?
This
build
process
defined
by
a
github
you
know
passes
I
often
find
I.
It
had
been
on
for
some
time.
I
guess,
just
as
a
way
of
me
learning
as
well.
B
I
had
found
that
it
wasn't.
They
didn't
really
find
value
in
it.
I
often
found
that
the
branches
feature
branches
were
out
of
date,
which,
which
makes
sense
that
that
happens,
but
that
the
time
it
took
to
wait
for
github
to
update
those
feature
branches
and
how
very
little
amount
of
the
time
that
there
was
actually
an
actual
conflict
that
needed
to
be
addressed,
but
that
I
didn't
really
find
value
in
this
check.
Have
others
use
this?
It
shouldn't
we
be
using
this,
but
not
necessarily
protecting
it.
But
I
mean
running
this
github
pages
check.
E
I've
used
it
in
the
past
with
a
documentation
site
that
I
was
managing
and
at
least
found
it
useful.
For
you
know,
people
making
one-off
changes
just
to
make
sure
that
the
site
still
compiled
like
if
they
were
adding
any
kind
of
Jekyll
tags
or
things
that
they
didn't
miss
a
closing
bracket
which
would
cause
the
site
to
not
generate,
but
I
do
know
it
does
take
a
little
bit
of
time
for
git
had
to
run
through
that
and
report.
That
status
is
green.
So
there's,
if
you're
looking
to
get
something
merged
in
quickly.
B
Okay,
that's
exactly
they
can't
keep.
That's
helpful.
Yeah
I
think
that
that
exposes
the
notion
that
I
lean
a
little
far
forward
into
being
a
view,
less
risk-averse,
which
has
me
in
hot
soup,
occasionally
without
being
impatient
about
reading
anything.
So,
okay,
very
good.
Anyone
else
have
any
comments
on
this
particular
topic.
G
G
B
Guess
what
we're
talking
about
pre-commit
folks
I,
had
let
me
ask
for
let
me
characterize
a
sentiment
that
I
have
toward
them
and
I'd
be
really
curious
for
everyone
else's
perspective
as
well,
that
one
of
the
things
that
we've
as
a
as
layer
5
has
been
a
community
for
some
time.
We'll
try
to
be
hopefully
overly
welcoming
and
warm
and
encouraging
of
folks
I'm
trying
to
make
their
mark,
and
some
of
us
are
just
you
know,
just
doing
it.
For
the
first
time
some
of
us
are
have
had
20
years
of
doing
it.
B
You
know
that
there
are
all
various
stages,
but
for
any
of
us
it's
easy
enough
to
get
hung
up
on
making
a
contribution
to
a
project
in
something
like
commit.
Signing
is
required,
or
a
pre-commit
hook
in
this
case
is
maybe
requiring
that
you've
got
your
Gamal
in
a
certain
format
or
or
whatever
that
that
is,
and
so
we've
been
hesitant
to
put
up
well,
I,
guess
it.
B
That
had
so,
my
sentiment
had
been
that
maybe
the
we
haven't
been
using
pre
commit
hooks
to
date
to
avoid
what
barriers
to
contribution
that
we
can,
but
the
community
and
the
code
base,
or
maybe
of
such
a
size
that
that
perhaps
that
needs
to
change
the
do.
Other
people
have
opinions
or
specific
preachment
hooks
that
they
thought
they
think.
We
would
do
very
well
to
include.
B
B
I
I
B
May
be
a
little
bit
of
discussion
here
of
what
Karthik
is
calling
out:
the
NCS
sandbox,
oh
dude,
most
of
us,
our
familiar
with
the
cloud
native
computing
foundation
and
the
fact
that
of
the
projects
that
have
been
donated
that
foundation
that
there
are
three
sessions.
If
you
will
three
tiers
of
projects,
those
that
are
considered
to
graduated
as
a
label,
those
that
are
considered
in
an
incubation
strata
and
those
that
are
in
sandbox,
the
term
sandbox
was
in
part
two.
B
You
know
it
is
intentionally
to
bear
the
connotation
of
being
having
a
lower
barrier
of
entry,
the
connotation
of
being
somewhat
experimental
projects
and,
as
such,
the
requirements
necessary
for
a
project
to
achieve
to
get
in
and
often
relatively
low.
We've
been
discussing
internally
to
the
CN
CF
about
raising
the
bar
of
what
those
requirements
are
for
project
to
get
into
sandbox.
B
And
it's
not
this
that
we've
been
discussing
those,
but
early
early
this
year
there
were
one
requirement
in
specific,
was
up
leveled
and
that
was
continued
for
each
sandbox
project
to
have
not
just
to
Tod
sponsors.
But
but
three
and
we've
been
talking
about
upping
those
requirement.
Last
couple
of
months
yesterday,
during
a
CF
toc
call,
there
was
a
proposal
to
you
know
more
or
less
like
lower
those
significantly,
which
is
sort
of
a
reverse
of
the
discussions
that
we've
been
having.
B
B
Marketing
given
to
those
projects,
the
the
issue
with
lowering
the
the
requirements
to
enter
into
sandbox
today
is
that
for
the
other
15
to
20
that
are
in
there
now
it
sort
of
does
them
a
disservice,
as
they'd
have
to
cop
they'd
have
to
go
through
all
the
diligence
to
get
in
there.
It
kind
of
degrades
the
value
of
the
thing.
I
guess
I
would
make
a
quick
analogy
to
well
took
to
martial
arts,
martial
arts
or
something
that
I've
done
a
really
long
time,
and
so,
as
you
reach
various
as
you.
B
Yes,
as
you
move
through
those
ranks,
I
guess
I
would
say
like
this.
If,
if
it
was
easy
to
get
a
black
belt,
if
everybody
could
get
a
black
belt
well,
it's
not.
That
would
be
meaningless.
It
just
wouldn't
perhaps
be
as
meaningful.
That's
kind
of
the
same
sentiment
that
I
would
I
would
characterize
toward
making
some
of
the
entrance
requirements
into
the
scenes.
Yes,
overly
easy,
at
least
in
that,
as
as
those
three
levels
are
defined
today,
they're
actually
there's
a
much
longer
discussion.
B
There's
a
bunch
of
reasons
why
we
try
to
correct
like
lower
the
entrance
requirements.
I
think
doing
so
will
probably
overcorrect
lots
of
discussions
to
go
forth
on
that.
Hopefully,
projects
like
the
litmus
chaos
won't
get
hung
up
in
discussions.
I.
Don't
anticipate
that
to
be
true,
so
there
has
been
the
occasion
where
projects
have
gotten
hung
up
as
process
changes
are
in
flight
I.
Don't
think
that
that
will
happen
here,
though,.
I
B
B
Part
of
what
I'm
challenging
myself
to
do
is
to
get
some
of
the
description
of
those
much
better
organized
and
out
to
out
for
us
before
we
meet
on
Friday
I
saw
a
dark
comment:
yeah
Nikhil,
I
think
the
killer
was
just
suggesting
you
know.
Maybe
they
should
have
a
dark
mode
in
Messer
II,
which
I
think
Anton
would
would.
Second,
that
motion.
B
City
yeah
I
mean
I,
don't
know
no
issues
here
that
sounds
fantastic
here.
I
had
taken
a
moment
last
time
that
Anton
actually
suggested
this
I
think
you
know
very
ayah
or
chord
mystery
itself,
which
sounds
fantastic
I
had
then
they
are
desire.
Ivo,
as
a
site
in
the
future,
is
to
be
running
on
a
service
map
to
come
to
Lera
5io.
B
How
did
you
experience
in
which
Derrick's
in
which
they
can
control
their
experience
by
actively
manipulating
the
config
of
this
regulation
and
that
affecting
their
experience
somewhere
5io
an
example
of
how
they
could
affect
experience?
What
is
by
enabling
by
enabling
and
disabling
a
dark
mode
that
wishes
that
the
site
itself
doesn't
support
today
and
maybe
in
the
future,
wouldn't
for
natively,
but
would
support
through
the
mesh
in
those
packets
replacing
the
SSP
sending.
This
is
just
a
way
of
helping
educate
people
on
possible.
B
I
On
just
probably
one
more
very
brief
topic,
these
was
part
of
the
hundred
four
or
probably
in
a
batch
immediately
after
that
we
might.
Peas
in
litmus
community
might
actually
be
putting
up
some
github
actions
and
get
lab
promoted
templates
of
our
chaos
for
consumption,
so
I
think
the
CI
CD
workgroup
might
probably
be
interested
in
doing
some
initial.
I
What
he
calls
annotate
tests
immediately
post
to
deployment.
Maybe
we
can
just
kill
the
mystery
deployments
if
there
are
some
and
then
just
check
the
help,
that's
the
process
has
been
simplified.
It
may
not
really
need
a
lot
of
installation
of
witness
components
before
doing
that.
You
can
just
pull
a
get
of
action
or
a
remote
templating.
Be
able
to
do
that.
So
that's
something
I'll,
probably
demo
at
some
point
in
the
subsequent
community
meetings.
B
I
Yet
so,
typically
the
way
that
we're
sort
of
looking
at
these
actions
are,
you
could
have
a
cluster
that
you
are
creating
and
disposing
away
as
part
of
your
CI.
Cd
kubera,
it
is
minimal,
cluster
could
be
mini.
Cube
are
the
kind
cluster,
for
example,
where
you
just
put
your
deployments,
and
we
just
see
that
they
sustain
certain
kind
of
fair
use
and
those
clusters
actually
can.
I
The
cube
conflict
fails,
for
example,
all
the
access
to
those
cluster
systems
that
you
can
dynamically
pass
through
as
one
of
the
parameters
to
your
actions
that
way,
the
action
will
take
care
of
putting
the
litmus
dependencies
executing
the
test.
Is
this
giving
you
the
output
and
this
just
being
done,
or
you
could
probably
have
a
staging
cluster
where
you're
continuously
testing
this
that's
also
possible.
B
G
Do
have
a
question,
but
it
might
theme
my
lack
of
knowledge
of
currently
my
stream.
Do.
We
have
like
a
sandbox
I
mean
when
you
let's
say
you
create
yard
for
measuring
and
that
one
if
I,
don't
merge
intermediate
or
whatever
deployed
in
a
sandbox
thing
or
bike
like
let's
say
you
done,
you
update
or
add
an
adapter
or
something,
and
now
you
want
to
run
it.
You
want
to
watch
your
branch,
but
you
have
one
intermediate
environment
where
it
is
already
deployed.
B
B
B
So
Karthik,
actually
it
sounds
like
I
mean
I
in
general.
It's
it's.
This
is
certainly
a
topic
of
interest
to
us.
There's
there's
an
individual
in
the
community,
his
name's
Asuka.
I
I
J
G
G
G
J
Lee,
can
you
hear
me
last
times
we
have
discussion
about
first
I.
Think
the
the
Karthik
suggestion
about
mascara
graph
definitely
would
have
that
in
mind,
and
we
can
set
this
Monday
meeting
agenda
for
that.
So
in
the
next
coming
Monday
we
can
set
the
CI
agenda
for
that's
litmus
chaos.
I
can
integrate
it,
but
one
more
things
that
that's
need
to
be
discuss
out.
That
I
think
a
research
I
saw
a
post
of
Hasek
up
console
that
they
have
now
this
service
available
in
Azure,
and
that's
have
a
beta
version.
That's
available
here.
J
So
my
point
here
is
that
if
more
and
more
service
messes
meshes
goes
to
the
public
crowd,
so
rather
would
that
have
in
a
midol
agenda
that
how
we
can
tackle
it?
We
go
to
the
cloud
as
well
that
mean
that's
I
mean
who
gets
to
them
or
just
had
a
doctor
there,
and
then
we
can
get
on
the
ground
various
points.
So
I
think.
The
point
is
that
if
more
and
more
that
goes
to
the
public
cloud,
so
you
have
to
sort
out
some
strategies
for
that.
J
E
Yeah
yeah
definitely
I
think
either
you
know,
I
can
do
a
walk-through
of
that
sort
of
suffering,
and
one
of
the
calls
that
would
be
helpful
or
I
can
have.
One
of
my
colleagues
join
who's,
a
little
more
closer
to
that
outside.
So
just
for
some
background,
I'm,
a
product
manager
for
console,
so
I
work,
you
know
very
close
to
the
console
and
Console
service
smash
and
then
the
offering
on
Azure
is
managed
by
our
separate
cloud
team,
so
they're
more
prioritizing
it
and
making
it
available
for
enterprises
to
consume.
E
You
know
as
a
SAS
offering
but
yeah
I'm
happy
to
come
and
speak
about
it
or
again,
bringing
one
of
my
colleagues
who
works
on
more
closely
on
the
cloud
team
to
talk
about
it.
But
you
know
at
a
high
level
the
goal
of
that
offering
is
just
to
really
make
it
easy
for
people
to
get
up
and
running
with
a
production
grade.
E
Service
meshed
and
not
have
to
you
know,
learn
all
the
inner
workings
of
how
to
set
it
up
how
to
secure
it,
how
to
upgrade
it
and
obviously
scale
it
as
they
grow
their
operations.
A
lot
of
people
don't
want
that
additional
operational
overhead
you
know
on
top
of
already
managing
kubernetes
or
whatever
infrastructure
platform
is
that
they
have
as
though
they're
just
looking
for
how
can
I
use
it,
but
when
it
breaks
I
want
it
to
be
someone
else's
problem.
I
want
another
throat
to
choke.
G
My
point
of
interest
will
be
I,
mean
I'm
sure
there
is
because
that's
how
also
it
was
on
the
docker
storm
I
assure
you
I'm,
calling
you
so
cuz
I
need
to
identify
on
the
other.
You
probably
have
an
azure
template
right.
Where
you
set
up,
you
need
to
set
up
only
the
nodes
and
whatever
things
or
is
it
from
you?
I
I'm,
interesting
in
see
the
template
that
we
can
use,
and
so,
like
I,
don't
know
the.
E
Yeah
I
can
share
some
information.
I
guess
in
here.
I
will
send
something
here
in
the
Czech
and
may
actually
pull
up
a
video,
but
one
of
our
technical
marketing
folks
at
how
she
Corp
did
a
walkthrough
of
this
offering
on
HDS,
and
so
they
show
kind
of
how
you
set
it
up,
but
basically
it's
available
as
an
application
in
the
azure
marketplace.
So
you
can
go
search
in
the
marketplace,
find
console,
deploy
it
and
it'll
walk
you
through.
E
You
know
a
wizard
of
selecting
your
instances,
your
virtual
network
that
you
want
to
peer
with
in
order
to
set
up
you
know
or
make
console
available
to
the
rest
of
your
corporate
or
enterprise
network.
I
walk
you
through
some
settings
like
that,
but
then
behind
the
scenes,
it'll
spin
up
console
for
you,
so
you
don't
have
to
go
and
dive
in
and
configure
yeah
Mille
values,
it'll
set
up
all
of
that
set
of
security,
ACLs
everything,
and
so
at
the
end
of
that
deployment.
E
You
know
you're
provided
access
into
that
already
configured
console
cluster
and
then
you
can
just
start
using
it
deploying
applications
enabling
them.
You
know
for
the
service
match
functionality
and
start
using
things
without
having
to
go
through
all
that
additional.
You
know
kind
of
work
from
steps
that
an
operator
would
have
to
do
in
order
to
stand
up
and
secure
the
environment.
G
E
That
makes
sense,
I
don't
know,
particularly
if
we
have
an
azure
template
that
would
allow
you
to
do
that.
We
do
have
a
he'll
make
a
s
cluster.
You
can
deploy
that
via
helm,
and
then
you
have
that
access
to
configure
exactly
the
settings
you
want.
You
have
a
way
to
scan
this
up
in
an
automated
fashion.
That's
outside
of
the
marketplace
offering
so
that
may
be
another.
E
The
hump
charts
available
in
github,
it's
a
github.com,
slash,
coccyx
or
slash,
console
helm
and
you
can
find
it
there
or
on
the
you
know,
console
the
I/o
website.
If
you
go
over
to
the
docs
there's
a
kubernetes
section
and
I'll
have
instructions
there
and
how
to
use
now
chart
to
stand
up
console
on
kubernetes.