►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Welcome
members
to
planning
meeting
today,
please.
A
Could
I
remind
everyone
that
today's
meeting
has
been
live
streamed
on
the
city
council
website,
so
the
public
can
observe
the
meeting
without
needing
to
be
present,
which
members
could
do
that
from
time
to
time,
but
we
can't
can't
we
City
Planning
panel
deals
with
applications
from
the
city
center,
as
well
as
the
largest
and
most
significant
application.
The
council
has
received
behavior
of
the
panels
who
had
all
relevant
information
from
applicants.
A
Members
of
the
public
and
Council
officers
to
help
members
of
the
panel
make
their
decision
in
accordance
with
our
protocol
for
public
speaking
at
plans
panel
members
of
the
public
may
be
intended,
maybe
maybe
in
attendance,
to
speak
to
the
panel
as
they
have
spoken.
I
will
I,
don't
think
we
need
our
children
today.
B
Yeah,
thank
you,
chair
under
agenda
item
number.
One.
We've
got
no
appeals
against
the
refusal
of
inspection
of
documents
under
item
number
two.
There
is
no
exempt
information
on
today's
agenda
agenda
item.
Three:
we've
got
no
late
items
agenda
item:
four:
do
members
have
any
interest
they
wish
to
declare?
B
A
L
Good
afternoon,
everyone
councilor
Sharon
Hamilton
I'm
subbing
today
for
councilor
growing
and
I,
represent
Motown
and
mean
Woodward.
A
A
C
Thank
you
chair
before
we
start
with
the
agenda.
We've
had
a
a
late
email
from
the
applicants
for
the
item
8
on
the
agenda,
which
is
land
salsa,
Sweet
Street.
The
applicant
has
advised
us
that,
unfortunately,
at
the
last
minute,
a
legal
funding
issue
has
arisen.
C
That
needs
to
be
resolved
prior
to
the
item
being
considered
that
panel
and
therefore
they're,
requesting
that
the
application
is
not
considered
at
today's
Final
meeting
but
deferred
for
consideration
at
a
future
meeting
in
accordance
with
the
council's
procedures,
because
the
item
is
already
part
of
the
agenda
panel
is
required
to
consider
that
request
and
vote
on
it.
C
So
that's
what
I'm
asking
the
chair
to
to
to
to
to
to
do.
Thank
you.
A
D
So
this
is
the
return
to
panel
of
the
development
of
the
former
ala
food
site
from
kirkstall.
Road
members
will
recall
the
proposal
which
was
put
before
anyone
the
3rd
of
November
last
year
and
deferred
at
that
meeting.
D
So
the
site
is
just
over
two
hectares
in
area:
it's
a
Brownfield
site,
310
meters,
west
of
the
inner
Ring
Road
So
within
walking
distance
of
the
city
center
with
a
boundary
onto
the
river
air.
D
The
sight
forms
part
of
a
wider
stretch
of
land
adjacent
to
the
river
being
brought
forward
for
similar
types
of
development
to
the
yeast.
For
example,
Clarion
homes
have
approval
for
around
1400
new
residential
units
and
362
student
rooms
over
11
buildings,
and
it's
anticipated
that
further
applications
will
come
in
as
work
on
this
site
becomes
more
advanced.
D
The
application
itself
is
for
618,
build
terrain
apartments
in
five
blocks,
with
356
square
meters
of
ancillary
commercial
uses
to
the
ground
floor,
226
parking
spaces
and
public
Realm.
D
D
The
proposed
layout
provides
for
a
high
density
residential
scheme
orientated
around
open
areas
with
pedestrian
throughput
available,
both
from
kirkstall
road
to
the
north
and
Washington
Street
to
the
West.
The
Proposal
includes
the
Riverside
Park
and
walkway,
which
would
connect
with
other
developments
coming
forward,
ultimately
providing
pedestrian
and
cycle
access
into
the
city,
as
well
as
across
the
river,
to
the
utter
Island
by
the
Clarion
home
scheme.
D
With
regard
to
affordable
housing,
the
scheme
initially
brought
forward
only
one
unit
which
was
justified
with
evidence
of
viability.
Considerations
as
required
by
policy
H5
in
the
core
strategy
panels,
took
the
view
that
this
provision
fell,
Too
Short
in
policy
terms,
and
that's
that
the
issue
will
be
Revisited.
D
D
The
applicants
now
able
to
commit
to
a
total
of
31,
affordable
units.
Well,
the
overall
provision
at
five
percent
still
falls
short
of
the
20
required
by
policy.
It
would
be
a
significant
Improvement
on
the
one
unit
originally
offered
the
applicant
requests.
That
panel
also
takes
into
account
that
they're
willing
to
provide
all
of
the
requested
section
106
contributions
with
the
exception
of
off-site
Green
Space,
along
with,
along
with
the
additional
30
affordable
units,
all
of
which
is
beyond,
what's
recommended
in
the
viability
assessment.
D
With
regard
to
housing
mix,
members
were
Keen
to
revisit
the
provision
of
three-bedroom
units.
The
applicants
considered
potential
ways
of
to
improve
on
the
10
currently
proposed.
However,
they
haven't
been
able
to
find
a
way
to
make
this
viable
or
practicable,
and
the
proposal
remains
at
10
percent.
D
Och4
requires
an
assessment
of
the
proposed
housing
mix
to
take
into
account
the
nature
of
the
development
and
the
character
of
the
location
in
this
case,
given
that
it's
a
high
identity
flatter
development,
it's
accepted
by
offices
that
the
scheme
would
favor
one
in
two
bed
units.
Although
the
provision
of
62
mule
three-bed
homes
is
also
a
significant
addition
to
the
locality
with
regard
to
balcony
provision,
members
wanted
to
make
sure
provision
was
maximized,
so
the
applicant
has
had
another
look
at
what
could
be
possible,
taking
impacts
into
consideration.
D
The
environment
agency
did
request
that
we
have
another
look
specifically
at
biodiversity
net
again
for
the
river,
and
this
has
been
done
since
the
application
was
brought
before
a
panel.
They
have
agreed
to
a
condition
based
on
parameters
supplied
by
the
applicant,
which
would
ensure
that
sufficient
riparian
biodiversity
net
gain
can
be
achieved.
D
Given
the
density
of
the
proposal
and
its
proximity
to
the
city
center,
it's
not
a
development
space
requirements
in
policy
G5
for
proposals
within
the
city
center
and
0.41
hectares
per
thousand
people
that
was
applied
to
this
site.
The
requirement
would
be
for
less
than
0.8
hectares
with
overall
provision
in
this
case,
including
General
landscaped
areas
being
around
1.15
hectares.
D
A
Thank
you
Steve.
There
are
no
speakers
again,
so
we
can
go
straight
on
to
questions
from
members.
Please
put
your
hand
up
if
you
wish
to
ask
a
question
Kaylee,
please.
H
I
know
that
there's
been
inclusion
of
like
mentioning
of
play
space
in
in
the
papers,
but
I'd
like
to
have
more
information
as
to
whether
it's
a
formal
playground
or
whether
it's
like
informal
play
I,
guess
like,
and
how?
How
much
of
how
much
of
the
the
public
realm
has
been
designed
with
child
friendliness
in
mind.
I
suppose.
D
I
think
there
are,
there
are
elements
of
of
formal
Place
base
situated
on
both
sides
of
the
lawn
and
then
informal
Place
based
associated
with
various
bits
of
garden
and
and
public
sort
of
communal
areas.
So
it
would
be
it.
It
would
be
a
bit
above
both
formal
and
informal.
C
I
think
it's
fair
to
say
from
the
applicant's
point
of
view.
They
help
you
to
work
with
us.
The
the
full
details
of
the
Landscaping
and
public
law
treatment
is
subject
to
condition.
So
if,
if
particular,
if
members
of
a
particular
View
happy
to
address
through
those
details,
but
the
spaces
is
safeguarded,
the
amount
of
space,
the
nature
of
it
public
access
to
it
is
safeguarded.
A
For
that
clarification,
I
will
bring
you
this
okay,
but
we
do
have
the
applicants
here.
If
we've
no
no
objectives,
so
we
could
invite
the
applicants
to
come
forward
and
the
Enlighten
us
a
bit
more
of
should
you
wish
is
that
okay.
A
Q
Q
Yeah,
in
essence,
both
former
and
informal
play
Space.
The
ideas
is
a
formalized
area
in
the
sort
of
cheeks
of
that
main
body
of
space.
That's
partly
enclosed
to
sort
of
Corral
children
into
an
area,
rather
than
just
let
them,
while
the
cost
space
there's
also
informal
play
Space
dotted
to
the
landscape
as
well
as
part
of
the
sort
of
Riverside
walkway
and
also
around
the
sort
of
periphery.
Of
that
lawn
space,
which
is
also
in
itself,
is
a
place
based.
If
that
makes
sense,.
H
Yeah
so
I
know,
I,
know
that,
like
the
it's
all
to
do
with
conditions
in
term
in
terms
of
the
formalized
play
Space
what
what
kind
of
equipment
we
did
you
have
in
mind
in
putting
putting
in
there.
J
For
example,
in
the
plunge
of
a
moment
we
have
slides
and
potential
sort
of
Bones
and
climbing
features,
and
we've
got
some
more
interspersed,
Timber
walking
beams.
So
we've
got
a
selection
of
actual
defined
play
items
such
as
columns,
climbing
rocks
and
slides,
but
also
interspersive
in
the
landscape.
We've
got
some
more
subtle
features
such
as
rocks
and
these
balance
beams,
which
can
keep
children
entertained
as
they
connect
through
the
sights
and
down
to
the
Riverside.
J
I
think
some
of
the
things
we've
been
looking
at,
which
are
physical
at
the
moment.
We
have,
for
example,
spinning
discs
which
children
who
can
climb
on
we've
got
some
examples
shown
on
these
Pages
here,
which
Ian
can
share
with
you,
but
I
think,
through
the
condition,
we're
happy
to
look
at
additional
features
and
hobos
and
sit
within
the
landscape,
so
the
scope
to
develop
that
to
reflect
the
requirements
of
members,
but
there's
not
a
specific
swing
showing
on
here
at
the
moment.
K
Thank
you,
chair
just
to
follow
on
from
Council
Brooks
on
greenspaces
could
Steve
could
he
shows
the
connectivity
to
the
player
earlier
her
Green,
Space
and
also
who's
going
to
be
maintained.
A
K
That's
fine
and
also
connectivity
and
the
maintenance
always
going
to
be
picking
up.
The
maintenance
and
I've
got
a
few
other
questions.
J
In
terms
of
the
site
itself
and
the
maintenance,
this
will
be
a
build
to
rent
development,
which
is
fully
managed,
and
so
the
operation
and
maintenance
of
the
site
will
be
undertaken
by
the
Labor
Management
Company,
albeit
it
will
be
fully
accessible
to
the
public.
It
isn't
a
private
space.
It
is
a
public
open
space
but
maintained
by
the
building
management
team.
K
I
mean
this
morning
on
the
site
visit.
There
was
a
boundary
wall
between
the
river
and
the
development.
Will
that
wall
stay
there
or
will
he
be
taken
out.
J
So
the
the
wall
which
has
been
installed
is
the
the
sort
of
Leeds
flood
alleviation
scheme
wall,
so
the
wall
does
remain.
However,
what
we
are
doing
is
creating
opportunities
to
transition
across
that
wall
into
the
Riverside,
walk
using
the
site
levels
to
bridge
the
gap
effectively
and
ramp
down
on
either
side
for
pedestrian
and
cycle
access.
K
And
finally,
last
time
when
you
came
to
the
city
plans
panel,
there
were
about
five
issues
always
says:
go
away
and
come
back
with
some
more
proposals.
One
was
the
affordable
housing.
You
can
ask
what
was
the
reason
you
could
not
achieve.
100,
affordable
housing
on
the
side
place.
J
I
think
the
reason
we
we
can't
is
is
explained
in
the
viability
reports,
so
we've
set
out
the
the
current
position
within
the
viability
of
a
district
value
which
clearly
establishes
why
that
isn't
possible
and
what
we
have
done
is
they
sought
to
improve
upon
that,
while
it's
trying
to
ensure
the
scheme
remains
deliverable
and
we
can
bring
the
new
new
homes
forward
at
this
location.
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
that
Council
Khan.
We
do
have
the
district
value
here.
If
you
want
any
further
questions
off
information.
O
Just
moving
on
from
councilor
Khan's
point
about
the
riverbank.
J
In
summary,
our
ownership
line
is
the
the
river
wall,
so
we
we
don't.
Our
own
ship
does
not
continue
into
the
into
the
river
itself,
so
our
own
Egypt
terminates
Upper
River
wall.
O
Sure
how
will
you
prevent
the
the
vegetation
on
the
River
Bank
encroaching
onto
the
Riverside
walk,
which
will
be
our
responsibility
as.
J
The
sales
owners
and
operators
we're
responsible
for
labor
maintenance
of
that
Riverside
walk.
So
we
don't
have
control
over
a
river,
but
we
are
responsible
for
the
maintenance
and
operation
of
what
will
be
the
Riverside
walk
which
sits
within
our
ownership.
I
I'm,
just
following
on
from
that
with
my
first
question,
is
how
we
maintain
that
path
along
all
the
developments.
Do
you
have
do
you
have
agreement
with
the
other
developers
because
they're
all
going
to
be
developed,
I
guess
at
a
slightly
different
time,
but
what
we
do
want
you
to
walk
all
the
way
along
there,
because
at
the
moment
the
only
flat
walk
is
on
the
canal
path,
which
is
a
long
way
away.
You
can't
actually
walk.
I
You
need
to
be
able
to
walk
on
that
side
from
Canal
Road
all
the
way
through
into
the
city
center
and
preferably
all
at
the
same
level.
We
don't
want
this
stepping
up
stepping
down
which
does
happen
on
some
parts
of
the
river
there.
So
how
are
you?
Are
you
confident
that
you're
maintaining
that
with
your
competition
partners.
J
I
C
Just
as
we're
going
to
control
provisional
producer
sidewalk
through
this
consent,
if
members
of
minded
to
support
we've
got
similar
Arrangements
on
Clarion
Holmes's
site,
there
are
sites
in
between
which
haven't
control
for
development
like
the
Nissan
garage
site.
But
we
have
an
overall
master
plan
for
this
area,
as
members
will
be
aware,
and
part
of
that
master
plan
is
to
provide
a
Riverside
Walk,
we're
working
closely
with
the
flood
alleviation
team,
we're
also
working
along
this
stretch
of
the
river.
C
So
the
the
intention
is
very
much
a
joined
up
route
regardless
of
separate
ownerships.
This
will
feel
and
look
as
one
route
because
to
to
to
to
a
large
extent,
we
have
a
lot
of
control
through
the
environment
agency
through
the
canal,
River
Tea
and
through
these
planning
consents.
So
it's
through
conditions
and
through
the
legal
obligations
in
terms
of
public
rights
of
access
and
final
treatment,
but
that
that's
the
intention.
Okay,.
A
I
Is
important
that
we
get
that
and
we
get
it
all
at
the
same
level.
What
I'm
concerned
about
is
that
developers
will
come
in
at
different
levels
and
we'll
end
up
with
steps.
Is
that
what's
further
in
the
city
center
wave
to
go
up
and
down
steps
by
nobody's
business
and
that's
because
different
developers
coming
at
different
levels
and
I?
Think
that's
that's
the
main
concern.
My
second
question
is
statistic:
value
is
I.
I
F
I
think,
in
terms
of
the
original
report,
the
inputs
we've
used
into
that
in
terms
of
rents
and
yields
are
robust
and
are
in
line
with
what
has
been
agreed
and
done
elsewhere
in
Leeds
I.
Obviously,
their
revised
proposal
I
have
looked
at
it.
It's
I
would
estimate
the
cost
and
it's
a
back
of
fact
packet
figure
of
something
in
excess
of
two
million
pounds
in
addition
to
their,
if
you're,
like
the
one
affordable
unit
and
I
can
only
speculate
well,
what
how
they
can
do
that?
A
Thank
you
for
that
qualification,
Council
come
Council
conference
and
then
come
councilor
Campbell.
K
Thank
you
chair
on
this
morning,
site
visit.
It's
a
huge
site.
It's
going
to
be
a
big
development
as
well,
and
my
question
is:
how
many
phases
will
you
be
going?
Will
you
do
in
one
in
a
block
development,
or
will
it
be
in
different
phases,
and
also
when
do
you
think
you
will
be
developing
on
the
side
if
it
gets
through
today.
J
So
Our
intention
is
very
much
to
bring
this
forward
as
a
single
development,
so
in
in
one
phase,
if
you
will-
albeit
with
sectional
completions,
just
due
to
the
number
of
units.
So
we
we
see
this
starting
on
sites
later
in
this
calendar
year
and
we'd.
Look
to
push
on
with
the
delivery
of
All
Phases
as
a
single
development
scheme.
O
Issues
at
a
highway
question:
can
you
just
pull
up
the
the
drawing
that
shows
the
access
onto
I
forgot
the
name
of
the
road
now
Coastal
Road?
Yes,
how
can
you
possibly
forget.
O
I
think
you
know
what
I'm
going
to
say.
One
of
you
does
I
I
have
to
I
happen
to
fill
in
the
a660
questionnaire
earlier
in
the
week,
and
it
makes
big
play
of
things
called
side
Crossings.
O
Let
me
find
the
name:
it's
Washington
Street.
O
What
are
the
proposals
for
effectively
showing
that
that's
pedestrians
have
priority
on
that
pedestrian
strike
lists
have
priority
over
motor
cars
on
those
two
Junctions.
E
It's
it's
not
shown
in
detail
on
this
plan.
However,
that's
the
type
of
data
we
pick
up
a
detailed
design
with
the
offset
Highway
Works,
including
formation
of
access,
and
we
are
with
our
new
transport
SPD,
which
is
recently
adopted.
It
is
written
into
there
that
you
know
Copenhagen
style
Crossings
are
encouraged
and
we
would
be
looking
at.
You
know.
E
This
is
probably
a
prime
example
where,
instead
of
a
curved
radii
access,
it
would
be
what
we
call
like
a
drop
Crossing
or
a
Copenhagen
style
Crossing,
where
basically
it's
about
it,
just
emphasizes
the
priority
of
pedestrians
and
cyclists
over
vehicles
coming
in
and
out
of
of
the
site,
which
is
the
high
record
anyway,
so
so
yeah.
So
we
will
make
sure
that
that
is
covered
under
the
detailed
design
for
the
hiring
works.
O
E
I
think
that's
something
we
just
need
to
look
at
in
in
the
road
safety
audit
to
ensure
that
we
do
think
it
is
appropriate
in
this
location,
but
I
think
it
would
at
the
minute,
would
be
like
a
a
drop
Crossing
rather
curved.
You
know
very
vehicle
dominated
access
on
both
these.
It
would
definitely
be
appropriate
on
the
Washington
Street
access,
but
it's
just
because
of
the
nature
of
Kirk's,
Road
I
think
it's
certainly
very
possible.
E
You
know
that
we
would.
We
would
absolutely
take
that
on
board
and
we
will
make
sure
that
that
is
given
full
consideration
and,
if
possible,
we
will
include
that
as
part
of
the
detail,
design
for
the
highway
works.
O
Q
I,
just
like
also
adds
that
we've
offset
building
a
another
two
weeks
away
from
coaxial
road
than
previously
the
outline
consent
phase.
So
it
doesn't
preclude
any
cycle
routes
or
any
pedestrian
routes
through
there's
a
seven
and
a
half
meters
back
from
the
northern
boundaries
that
were
so,
it
doesn't
preclude
any
cycle
infrastructure
that
in
fact
promotes
it.
A
I
Was
honestly,
it
was
on
the
same
point
as
it
is
now
the
highway
code
that
pedestrians
going
straight
on
right
away?
Are
you
intending
leaving
the
inbound
traffic
turning
in
there
sitting
on
kirksall
road
for
the
pedestrians,
or
are
you
going
to
either
de
acceleration
Lane
there
because
I
know
you
won't
be
interested
about
car
traffic
in
there,
but
I
think
if
I'm
not
right,
there's
a
bus
we're
in
there,
and
so
if
they're,
waiting,
they'll
be
feeding
the
bus
and
that
must
never.
L
E
I
E
A
Thank
you
Lisa
Caleb,
please.
H
Thanks
chair,
I'm,
I
I
agree
with
everything
that's
been
said,
but
I'd
also
like
to
throw
another
spanner
in
which
is
about
pedestrian
routes
to
the
north,
to
the
primary
school,
because
I
can
see
that
there's
there's
a
there's,
a
hefty
education
contribution.
So
so
the
development
clearly
is
going
to
generate
pupils.
So
has
any
thought
been
given
to
the
safety
of
by
basically
children
walking
to
to
Primary
School.
E
Part
of
that
offset
Highway
works,
the
The,
Crossing
close
to
the
say,
is
going
to
be
upgraded
to
Tucan
to
life
cycle
and
then
an
improved
route
up
to
Burley
Road
as
well
to
provide
that
sort
of
segregated
route
for
cycling
and
walking
up
to
Burley,
Road
and
then
I
believe,
there's
not
a
Crossing
on
Valley
Road
as
well,
but
not
as
part
of
this
development,
but
that's
existing.
So
there
are
routes
to
you
know
to
provide
for
for
a
seafood
to
the
nearest
Primary
School
there,
foreign.
H
What's
planned
be
adequate
for
the
the
number
of
pupils
that
are
expected
to
be
generated
so
because,
if
if,
if,
if
there's
quite
a
lot
of
pupils
being
generated
like
you
know,.
E
I
I
mean
all
summers
will
increase
potential
over
time,
so
I
think
what
we
we've
secured
is
adequate,
but
obviously
there'll
be
you
know.
If
there's
then
an
issue
at
least
you
know
it's
always
hard
to
predict
how
many
and
I'm
also
what
school
children
will
be
going
to,
because
there's
different
schools
aren't
there
and
people
and
other
other
they
might
be
going
along
across
the
road
and
up
to
burlescent
Mathias
for
instance.
So
you
know
so
there's
different
schools
and
different
routes.
So
there
will
be
some
dissemination
up.
H
But
the
the
closest
primary
school
will
be
rosebank
primary
school,
so
assuming
that
there's
spaces
that
can
be
filled
at
that
primary
school
I
should
imagine
that
parents
would
prefer
that
primary
school
as
their
their
first
choice.
Simply
I
mean
it's
a
very
good
one.
H
Ofsted
results
are
very
good,
so
I
think
I
think
like
just
making
sure
that
the
oh
yeah
I
was
just
making
sure
that
all
of
that
had
been
considered
already.
Thank
you.
A
H
Apologies
share
I
wanted
I
wanted
to
keep
it
all
sort
of
to
topic.
If
that
makes
sense,
the
the
affordables
so
I
can
I
can
see
it's
80
of
Market
rent
is
what's
been
proposed
and
I'm
just
wondering
what
what
rent
level
that
would
be
like
what
would
the
market
rent
be
so
that
we
can?
We
can
know
what
the
80
is.
J
So
I
think
in
terms
of
the
the
rental
levels
they'll
be
reflective
of
the
markets
at
the
Times.
There
was
no
fixed
level
of
rent.
However,
what
we
are
committing
to
do
is
providing
a
number
of
units
as
per
availability,
I'd,
say
reduction
of
20
to
that
level,
and
we
want
the
development
to
be
occupied
and
we
want
it
to
be
well
utilized.
J
So
the
conditions
will
reflect
what
we
believe
is
a
reasonable
rent
for
this
location,
the
viability
set.
So
it's
the
the
current
rental
expectations.
I,
don't
have
those
two
to
hand
in
front
of
AR
sets
out
in
the
district
value
is
report
in
terms
of
the
typical
rental
values.
There
will
be
a
range
on
the
scheme
dependent
on
a
number
of
factors
which
be
the
building
management
will
put
in
place,
but
the
with
General
zero
is
a
mid-market
rent,
not
a
exclusionary,
rent.
H
So
you
you,
don't
have
a
a
specific
range
in
mind
for
the.
J
The
the
ranges
is
included
within
the
district
valuers
report,
which
I
I
don't
have
in
front
of
me
at
the
moment,
so
we're
from
memory,
ethics.
D
F
I
started
worked
out
to
back
a
packet
calculation
to
work
out
the
the
value,
if
you
like,
of
that
20
I
calculated,
the
average
size
of
the
unit,
was
636
square
feet
and
the
average
rent-
and
we
do
this
on
a
per
square
foot
basis
rather
than
if
you
like
per
annum.
Or
what
have
you
it's
21
pounds.
So
if
you
multiply
those
two
together,
I
would
say:
you're
about
12
800
pounds
a
year,
I'm,
sorry
I,
don't
have
a
calculator
yeah.
A
G
Yes,
I'm
sorry
I
couldn't
come
on
this
site
visit,
which
this
might
have
done
it,
but
I'm
right
in
thinking.
There's
access
to
the
Riverside
walk
and
everything.
G
Given
that
there's
going
to
be
a
significant
additional
number
of
people
suddenly
living
by
the
Riverside
is
that
will
there
be
a
need
for
any
increased
water
safety
measures
such
as
more
life
belts
or
whatever
being
put
alongside
the
the
wall
in
case
of
people
falling
in,
for
example,
and
what
the
developers
consider
have
and
have
they
discussed
this
with
the
water
safety
group
of
the
canals
and
rivers
trust
and
make
a
contribution
to
it.
J
So,
as
as
part
of
the
public
realm
works,
we
will
be
looking
at
a
new
fence
line
along
the
the
river
walls
that
will
be
reposed
of
a
river
wall
and,
as
has
been
installed
with
fuzz
2
there'll,
be
new,
a
new
fencing
boundary
line
and
we
will
speak
and
engage
on
any
specific
measures
which
the
environment
agency
or
canal
and
rivers
trust
would
like
us
to
put
in
place
such
as
like
buzzing.
What
we're
happy
to
consider
about
through
those
discussions.
A
M
Thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you,
chair
I.
We
had
concerns
when
this
was
before
his
last
time
and
notwithstanding
the
district
value
were
being
very,
very
clear
that
our
main
concerns
had
no
real
basis
in
policy.
We
asked
the
developer
to
go
back
and
you
have,
and
so
I
just
want
particularly
grateful.
You've
come
back
with
significantly
improved
affordabilities.
Fine,
it's
it's!
M
It's
not
yet
at
policy,
that's
disappointing,
but
the
district
value
as
I
explained
why
that
is
the
case
and
obviously
we
are
absolutely
obliged
to
take
that
on
board.
We
made
the
point
around
balconies
in
our
view
that
that
would
significantly
improve
the
development
and
looking
at
what's
before
us
I
would
argue
it
has
significantly
improved
the
development
and
the
work
you've
done
around
the
green
space.
M
I
think
it
is
right
and
proper
I
think
this
is
a
significantly
improved
application
that
is
before
us
and
well
without
blowing
the
city
plans
panel
trumpet
too
much
I
think
in
large
part.
That's
big
because
we've
asked
you
to
have
a
look
and
come
back
with
something:
that's
better
and
think
this
is
better
and
when
the
time
comes,
chat,
I'd
be
happy
to
move.
A
Like
you're
done,
for
those
words,
can
I
bring
in
David,
please.
N
Okay,
we've
got
it
working,
there's
been
some
significant
movement
on
on
this
I
think
from
the
top
last
time
it
was
there.
It's
still
disappointing
that
we
have
got
a
situation
where.
B
N
We
haven't
got
the
the
levels
of
and
types
of
Belgium
that
we
want,
but
as
his
own
District
value
was
spoken
and
and
quite
clearly
it's
not
viable
to
do
that.
But
it
seems
to
me
that
from
listening
to
questions
that's
gone
through
and
there
are
still
some
issues
there,
particularly
with
World
members
and
I.
Just
wondered
well
I'm
prepared
to
support
the
recommendations.
Would
it
not
be
helpful
if
the
world
members
were
involved
in
the
process
Beyond
this,
so
that
those
issues
could
be
resolved
yeah,
but.
I
Don't
get
you
I
mean
it
proves
that
it
was
worth
sending
it
back,
because
we've
got
improvements
in
in
all
the
areas.
Nothing's
been
spoken
about
balconies,
so
I
must
speak
about
balcons,
because
the
balcony
champion
on
that
side
is
not
here
and
Sharon
you're
deputizing
for
it,
and
we
have
got
some
improvement
in
balconies
as
well,
and
so
it
was
worth
sending
it
back.
In
my
opinion,
on
affordable
housing
and
and
the
balconies
alone,
we've
got
improvements
everywhere.
I
I
do
think
that
the
world
members
should
be
involved
with
regards
to
that
and
it's
around
conditioning
now
as
to
where
we
go
forward
to
get
the
very
best
habit
with
playspace
and
The
Copenhagen
Crossing
or
whatever
you
want
to
call
it
now,
we're
all
European
together,
but
I
think
it's
it's
it's
good
enough
for
us
to
leave
it
to
offices
now
to
pick
up
on
the
detail.
Thank
you.
A
H
Thanks
chair,
I
I
agree
that
this
development
is
much
improved.
This
application
is
much
improved.
I
I
do
have
to
say,
like
as
a
as
a
ward
member
I,
do
find
it
incredibly
frustrating
to
to
set
on
Plants
panels
where
the
the
the
type
of
housing
that
that
comes
forward
is
quite
often
very
expensive
and,
although
I'm
sure
will
be
built
to
a
high
level.
High
standard
is
still
very
expensive
for
local
people,
who
are
maybe
living
in
overcrowded
housing
to
move
into
I.
H
Do
appreciate
the
fact
that
we're
at
five
percent,
when
the
district
value
were,
is
saying
that
you
know
really.
You
shouldn't
be
able
to
afford
that.
So
I
do
appreciate
that
you've,
you've
bumped
it
up
to
five
percent,
but
I
I'm
still
a
little
bit
disappointed
in
this,
even
though
I
know
that
you've
done
your
best
with
it.
What
I
would
like
to
see
is
some
swings
right.
I
would
like
to
see
a
inclusive
swing.
H
That's
inclusive
of
children
with
disabilities
as
well
so
like
wheelchair
wheelchair,
using
children
can
use
it
as
well,
and
that
would
be
lovely
I
feel
that
that
would
be
of
benefit
to
not
not
just
the
community.
That's
going
to
be
to
grow
and
live
here,
but
also
to
The
Wider
city
in
terms
of
quality
of
play,
Space
and
I
think
for
the
I
think
for
the
the
businesses
that
are
going
to
be
based
here
or
it'll
increase
a
number
of
families
that
visit
as
well
and
increase
footfall
yeah.
H
So
thank
you,
I'm
going
to
be
I,
think
probably
supporting
this
this,
but
it's
it's
I
just
want
to
put
on
record
that
the
reason
that
I'm
I'm
minded
to
support
this
is
because
it
complies
with
planning
policy,
which
is
something
the
the
government
impose
on
the
council.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you,
Kelly
and
I'm
sure
from
the
smiles
from
the
applicants.
You'll
probably
get
your
your
swings,
as
stated
who
who
has.
O
Well,
I
I,
an
inclusive
swing,
I'm
I'm,
happy
with
I
I
I,
don't
like
throttle
play
areas
Caroline's,
not
here,
because
she's
another
one
who
lacks
informal
play
areas
and
I
prefer
those,
but
that
you
pay
money
and
take
your
choice
in
simple
terms,
you
would
be
saying
to
me
normally
I'd
be
saying:
no
I
can't
support
this,
partly
because
it
doesn't
meet
policy
in
relation
to
affordables
I,
don't
think,
there's
enough
Green
Space
on
site
and
whole
raft
of
authors,
which
were
rehearsed
on
more
than
one
occasion
and
I
think
you
all
know
my
view
on.
O
It's
not
your
fault.
The
way
that
the
district
value
is
called
upon
to
Value
these
properties
I,
don't
believe
for
a
minute
that
this
this
is
an
unaffordable
site,
an
undevelopable
site,
because
you
can't
afford
it.
It's
just
simply.
The
methodology
you
use
your
first
to
use
to
calculate
the
value
seems
to
me
to
create
an
artificially
low
figure.
O
The
concept
of
today's
notional
rent
times
the
Square
meterage
Times
22.,
doesn't
reflect
the
residual
value
of
the
property
in
any
way.
It's
simply
a
notional
way
of
doing
this.
O
Having
said
that,
we
are
where
we
are
and
so
I
suppose
we
ought
to
be
positive
in
that
there's,
as
you
say,
it's
better
than
it
was
it's
still
not
perfect,
but
I,
think
and
and
I
think
it's
a
it's
something
to
flag
up
for
the
development
plans
panel
that
there
are
still
a
number
of
areas
that
we
have
control
over
rather
than
National
planning
policy
that
we
feel
are
not
working
to
the
benefit
of
the
people
we
represent
and
therefore,
as
part
of
the
review
of
the
local
plan.
K
Thank
you,
chair
and
I
also
do
Echo
the
comments.
What
made
by
my
colleagues
and
also
I
do
welcome
this
to
element
and
I.
Think
it's
going
to
be
a
good
quality
development
taking
place
and
it
will
really
nicely
blend
in
with
there's.
As
you
know,
there's
other
developments
taking
place
around
Cooks
Road,
so
it
will
really
welcome
and
I'm
happy
to
support
his
wheelchair.
Thank
you.
G
G
I
agree
that
the
lower
level
of
affordability,
then
that
we
would
usually
agree
with
is
regrettable,
but
it
is
as
it
is,
and
I
think
that
there
are
different
ways
of
achieving
swings
that
don't
look
like
an
A-frame
in
primary
metallic
and
primary
colors,
but
are
still
a
swing
and
that
fit
in
really
well,
whether
they're
wooden
or
various
other
imaginative
things
which
still
are
a
swing
and
I.
Think
the
accessibility
is
very
important
and
can
be
achieved
without
too
much
difficulty.
A
Okay,
well,
it
seems
to
be
a
general
theme
that
that
we
are
where
we
are
but
I'm
missing,
prepared
to
support
the
application.
Is
there
any
members
who
would
wish
to
move
that
then?
Secondly,
I'll,
please?
A
My
that's
unanimous
thank
you
for
that
can
I
thank
you
for
coming
forward
and
providing
additional
information
that
was
very
valuable
to
us
and
we
wish
you
all
the
best
to
get
us
started.
It
looks
a
it
looks,
an
excellent
development
and
I
look
forward
to
seeing
it
coming
out
of
the
ground,
but
thank
you
and
good
afternoon.
C
P
Good
afternoon
everybody
Matthew
Walker
City
Center
planning
team
so
to
change
to
the
advertise
schedule
when
the
right
the
the
next
item.
This
planning
application
deals
with
the
proposed
introduction
of
three
tall
buildings.
Dan.
Can
you
just
move
the
next
slide?
I'm
sorry,
three
tall
buildings
and
Associated
public
realm
to
form
a
major
residential
development
on
the
western
edge
of
the
city
center
at
the
former
Yorkshire
post
site.
P
Now
the
sites,
as
many
of
you
will
know,
has
long
been
near
map
for
development,
having
received
planning
permission
in
2015
for
a
mixture
of
residential
hotel
and
office
uses.
P
Now
the
site
is
a
key
Brownfield
site
and
it's
a
strategic
importance
given
its
location
and
the
site,
size
and
capacity
and
in
townscape
terms,
is
a
key
Gateway
location
into
the
city
center
from
the
West
is
predominantly
vacant
status
is
something
the
developer.
Team
and
officers
have
been
working
to
resolve
for
the
benefit
of
the
city
for
a
number
of
years
now,
through
a
series
of
pre-application
discussions,
and
now
this
formal
application
next
slide.
Please.
P
Sorry,
it's
built
to
run.
My
apologies
is
built
around
student
accommodation,
it's
for
anyone,
I'm
familiar
with
the
application
site.
It
sits
at
the
Confluence
of
the
western
end
of
Wellington
Street
and
Wellington
Bridge
Street
and
is
bonded
to
its
Southern
Edge
by
the
river
air,
beyond
the
river's
southern
boundary,
City
Island,
and
to
the
Eastern
side
of
the
wider
site
boundaries.
Wellington
Place.
The
area
is
evolving
into
a
residential
environment,
with
a
number
of
large-scale
residential
developments,
including
Lisbon
Street
and
Bridge
house
to
the
north.
P
The
outline
consent
for
phase
two
Wellington
Place
includes
a
large-scale
residential
component
as
a
later
phase,
and
then
obviously,
we
have
the
now
well-established
City
Island
residential
Enclave
to
the
South.
The
rectangling
gray
here
shows
the
footprint
of
the
headline
building,
which
is
the
existing
built
to
rent
building
members
who
were
on
the
site
visit
this
morning,
were
that's
where
you
got
dropped
off
and
it's
Associated
public
realm,
which
has
been
built
out
to
the
extent
of
its
demise,
which
the
current
proposals
will
key
into
next
slide.
P
Please
now
this
image
gives
a
flavor
of
the
The
Wider
context
and
shows
the
site
and
its
relationship
to
the
large-scale
highways
infrastructure
of
the
inner
Ring
Road
West,
Street
and
Wellington
Street
next
slide.
Please,
and
then
this
plan
shows
the
general
layout
of
the
proposed
development
notes
in
the
footprint
of
the
three
proposed
buildings
and
how
the
public
realm
around
the
headline
building
would
link
up
to
the
wider
site.
P
There's
some
key
features
of
Note
here,
which
the
first
of
which
members
who
were
in
attendance
at
the
pre-application
presentation
for
this
will
recall
the
introduction
of
an
urban
micro
forest
or
a
wood
or
a
cops.
If
you
prefer,
there
was
a
bit
of
a
semantic
debate
as
I
recall,
but
for
the
benefit
of
members.
Today,
it's
termed
as
a
micro
Forest.
P
Two
two
large-scale
public
art
features
which
are
in
a
sense
with
mitigation
columns
designed
along
along
the
western
edge
of
the
boundary
just
near
the
cycle,
line
that
you'll
see
there
effectively
to
to
a
channeling
of
of
wind
across
the
site
in
a
safe
manner,
a
relocated
access
road
which
forms
a
west
to
east
spine
across
the
middle
of
the
site.
P
A
new
Riverside
walkway,
leading
from
the
new
site,
access
along
the
River
Edge
to
form
a
connection
to
Wellington,
Place
and
then
onto
Whitehall
Road
and
the
new
monk
Bridge
developments,
series
of
and
inverted
commas,
biophilic
structures
that
you
can
see
noted
at
the
top
of
the
planet.
The
corner
of
the
Bill
of
the
site,
which
are
in
fact
purpose-built
when
mitigation
structures
I'll
come
on
to
those
shortly
and
then
a
widening
of
the
existing
Public
Square
in
front
of
the
headline
to
provide
a
central
focal
point
to
the
public
Realm.
P
Next
slide,
please
so
this
we
start
now
with
building
a
now.
This
sits
at
the
northern
portion
of
the
site
and,
as
you
can
see
from
the
plan
above
will
involve
well,
you
can't
see
it
from
this
pump,
but
two
lower
sections
with
the
public
route
through
and
the
collinated
configuration,
so
you
can
get
maximize
The
Pedestrian
movement
space
around
the
footprint
of
the
building.
Now
this
is
purpose-built
student
accommodation.
P
It
would
provide
1131
student
units,
the
ground,
mezzanine
and
first
floor
levels
of
the
building
would
contain
student
ancillary
spaces
to
serve
the
future
residential
community
on
site,
as
well
as
some
plant
rooms,
study,
spaces,
laundry
reception,
refuse
and
cycle
storage
facilities
next
slide.
Please-
and
this
is
some
cgis
of
the
building,
as
seen
in
context
with
the
aforementioned
biophilic
structures,
which
act
as
wind
mitigation
and
the
larger
scale
wind
mitigation.
Public
art
features,
are
the
columns
in
place
next
slide
please
now.
This
is
the
building
really.
P
It
affects
step
by
two
shoulders
from
13
stories
in
height
to
a
maximum
height
of
42
stories,
and
this
plan
is
intended
to
show
the
elevational
profile
of
the
buildings,
albeit
as
was
evident
on
the
last
Slide
the
right
hand
shoulder
on
the
left
hand.
Image
here
is
actually
sprayed
at
an
angle
that
doesn't
really
reflect
very
well
on
the
on.
P
The
elevations,
however,
will
you'll
be
able
to
see
the
effect
of
that
on
the
site
in
future
images
in
terms
of
materials,
it's
supposed
to
propose
to
use
a
series
of
profile
metallic
panels
to
provide
depth
and
Shadow
each
window
at
Bay
is
partly
screened
to
provide
a
perforated
element
to
allow
the
resident
the
choice
of
whether
or
not
they
want
to
open
Windows
a
lot.
The
the
scheme
is
not
predicated
on
them
having
to
do
that.
P
The
building
will
be
fitted
with
mechanical
ventilation,
as
per
is
normally
the
case
around
Highway
dominated
residential
buildings
in
the
city
center.
But
but
the
choice
is
there
with
one
eye
on
the
future
and
lower
noise
levels,
lower
pollutant
levels
through
electric
vehicles
to
be
able
to
have
that
choice
in
future
years?
Should
the
resident
prefer-
and
you
can
see
that
Arrangement
there
on
the
right
hand
image
there?
That
gives
you
a
sense
of
the
the
sort
of
depth
and
profile
of
Windows
of
the
building,
which
is
an
important
consideration.
P
Given
the
height
of
this
building
at
42
stories,
there
needs
to
be
quite
a
bit
of
visual
interest
there
next
slide.
Please
I'll!
Just
take
you
briefly
through
the
internal
arrangement
of
this
building.
This
is
the
ground
floor
which
hosts
access
up
to
the
mezzanine
level,
student
welfare
and
amenity
facilities,
receptions
cycle,
Stars,
lift
access
next
slide,
a
mezzanine
level.
Again,
it's
dominated
by
student
amenity
areas
commonly
seen
in
purposeful
student
developments.
You
can
see,
on
the
left
hand,
image
the
left
left
hand
side
of
that
image.
P
The
cycle
storage
for
ground
floor
extends
up
to
this
level
and
has
dedicated
lift
access
in
there
next
slide.
Please
and
the
first
floor
proper
here
with
a
third
layer
of
student
facility
and
Immunity
space,
and
then
an
expansion
area
which
will
be
available
for
activating
for
cycle
storage
based
on
demand
and
that
will
be
controlled
through
the
travel
planning
regime
at
the
site.
P
P
This
provision
is
for
both
buildings,
A
and
B,
and
there'll
also
be
further
cycle
parking
provided
on
a
short
stay
basis
within
the
public
realm
Building
C,
as
we
get
to
it,
also
has
its
own
dedicated
cycle
store
as
well.
Next
slide,
please
now.
This
is
the
layouts
for
floss
2
to
13,
mainly
comprising
cluster
bedrooms
and
some
accessible
Studios.
The
development
hits
the
requirements
in
terms
of
our
SPD
guidance
on
room
sizes
ratios
to
communal
spaces
and
such
like.
P
They
also
meet
the
requirements
of
the
accessibility
policies
in
terms
of
the
amount
of
accessible
studios
in
the
scheme.
Is
policy
compliant
in
those
regards
next
slide?
Please,
and
as
we
move
it
to
level
13,
you
can
see
again
it's
predominantly
cluster
bedrooms
in
this
building,
knowing
that
there
are
areas
on
the
two
shoulder
Terraces
there
designated
for
Resident
use.
However,
the
full
extent
of
those
Terraces
can't
be
used
due
to
wind
safety
issues.
Those
are
the
maximum
extents
that
can
be
allowed
due
to
wind
safety.
P
There
next
slide,
please
and
then,
as
we
move
through
the
remaining
floors,
we
have
a
configuration
of
clusters
and
some
warm
bed
Studios
and,
as
I
previously
mentioned,
all
the
Clusters
in
the
development
meet
our
standards
on
size
and
ratios
of
communal
space,
and
the
layouts
are
designed
as
such,
that
to
in
order
to
maximize
the
the
two
glazed
ends
of
the
building.
P
That's
where
the
communal
space
will
reside
so
that
there
will
be
a
visible
sense
of
activity
up
and
down
the
building,
as
as
you
look
from
ground
level,
next
slide,
please
I'll
move
on
to
Building
B
again,
this
is
purpose-built
student
accommodation
again,
the
building's
partly
culminated
to
maximize
the
amount
of
pedestrian
space
around
its
footprint
along
its
Western
Edge
next
slide.
P
Now
this.
This
is
a
this
building
us
as
a
visual
mediator
between
the
other
two
buildings.
The
materials
palette
is
predominantly
terracotta,
brick
colored
and
then
the
images
as
you
can
see
here.
This
is
based
around
the
Portland
stone
that
which
is
quite
common
throughout
Leeds,
so
that
that
acts
as
sort
of
a
visual
break
between
the
two
more
red
colored
buildings
and
the
headline
building
that
sits.
In
the
backdrop,
the
building
the
lower
element
of
the
building
is
13
stories
rising
up
to
32
next
slide.
P
Please,
and
this
image
shows
the
elevational
treatment
of
the
building.
It's
it
predominantly
follows
the
same
theme
as
building
a
there's,
some
slight
variations
in
the
detailing
and
again,
the
approach
is
to
use
the
perforated
screens
part
of
each
bedroom
window
to
give
the
choice
on
natural
ventilation
next
slide.
Please.
P
This
is
the
basement
area
of
Building
B.
It's
a
student
Spa
facility
that
will
be
available
to
both
build
the
residents
of
building
a
and
Building
B
includes
a
swimming
pool,
and
then
these
two
buildings
will
be
operated
by
single
operators,
so
students,
without
prejudice
to
what
building
they're
living,
will
have
access
to
all
of
the
facilities
in
both
buildings.
Next
slide,
please.
P
This
is
the
ground
floor
again.
It
follows
a
similar
format
to
building
a
hosting
student
amenity,
space,
bin
storage
and
plant
rooms.
Next
slide.
Please
first
floor
will
contain
a
very,
very
sizable
gym
for
residents
of
both
buildings
next
slide
and
then
at
first
floor.
We
start
to
see
the
typical
layouts,
including
a
mixture
of
Studios,
accessible
Studios
and
the
smaller
scales
of
the
Clusters.
There
are
a
variety
of
different
cluster
sizes
in
this
game
and
again,
all
of
which
meet
our
policies
in
terms
of
space
standards
and
ratios
to
communal
space
next
slide.
P
P
There's
a
reduced
footprint
As!
You
move
further.
The
next
slide
down
okay,
so
this
is
Building
C
and
it's
proposed
to
be
a
built
to
rent
residential
building,
so
the
southern
end
of
the
site
closest
to
the
river,
that's
the
smaller
of
the
three
buildings,
and
it
has
348
Apartments
next
slide,
please.
P
So
it's
a
25-story
building
and
there
are
two
rooftop
Terraces,
both
of
which
are
accessible
done
and
are
not
affected
by
wind
conditions,
so
they're
accessible
to
their
full
extents.
Next
slide,
please,
and
then
again
in
terms
of
the
facade,
you
can
see
it's
another
variation
on
the
same
theme,
albeit
there's
a
greater
variety
of
window
openings
here,
given
the
fact
that
the
majority
of
the
main
runs
of
facade
are
not
clusters
with
individual
bedrooms,
but
need
to
be
a
variety
of
different
spaces.
I.E
kitchens
from
rooms
Etc
next
slide,
please.
P
This
is
the
ground
floor.
There's
a
Class
E
commercial
unit
proposed
here
in
green
and
then
the
number
of
back
of
house
such
as
bins
and
plant
its
own
dedicated
cycle
store
and
then,
as
you
expect,
with
Bill
to
rent
developments,
there's
quite
a
large
communal
area
for
residents.
P
P
There
again,
you
can
see,
there's
a
variety
of
degrees,
twos
and
one
beds
at
each
floor
next
slide,
and
we
again
have
external
Terrace
area
available
and
an
internal
immunity
area
halfway
up
the
building.
Next
slide,
please
and
again
just
repeating
the
same
sort
of
thing
just
to
just
to
demonstrate.
The
different
unit
sizes
are
available
at
each
floor
next
slide.
Please
now,
before
continuing
any
further
with
the
presentation,
I
need
to
draw
members
attention
to
an
error
in
the
report
and
it's
quite
significant
area
for
which
I
apologize.
P
If
you
turn
section
9.2
you'll
see
a
table
has
been
provided
and
the
table
suggests
that,
in
terms
of
housing
mix,
the
scheme
is
providing
for
81
one
bed
units
and
12
two
bed
units.
Now
this
is
incorrect.
It's
it's
incredible,
I'm,
not
sure
why
this
has
happened
and
I
can
only
apologize.
I'll
just
take
this
moment
now
to
set
out
the
actual
housing
mix
and
the
position
regarding
three
bed.
P
Accommodation
in
the
scheme,
as
the
proposals
do
introduce
a
novel
and
flexible
way
of
addressing
the
demand
for
three
bed
accommodation
and
our
policy
position.
We've
not
seen
this
before
it
was
Allied
to
members
of
the
pre-application
inquiry
that
was
put
forward,
but
basically
to
to
sum
up
the
schemas
built
on
day.
One
is
supposed
to
feature
just
over
47
one
bedroom
units
and
just
over
45
two
bedroom
units
with
just
under
three
percent
three
bedroom
units.
P
So
in
terms
of
the
preferred
mix
this
the
report
is
correct.
It
still
over
provides
on
warm
beds
and
two
bed
units
and
another
provides
on
three
beds,
and
this
has
been
justified
through
their
housing
needs
assessment,
consistent
with
other
built-to-rent
developments
based
on
the
nature
of
the
type
of
accommodation
and
its
location
in
the
city
center.
P
However,
the
the
figures
in
the
table
in
the
report
are
wrong.
The
figures
in
that
table
suggest
the
far
more
severe
shortfall
against
the
policy.
That's
actually
the
case
and
the
members
will
have
noted
at
9.2.6
of
the
report.
The
applicant
has
made
a
proposal
that
could
see
the
proportion
of
the
three
bed
units
in
the
scheme
change
at
the
expense
of
some
of
the
two-bed
units
based
on
market
demand.
P
42
of
the
two
bedroomed
units
in
the
scheme
exceed
the
H9
policy
requirements
policy
H9
in
the
course
strategy
for
two
bed
accommodation
and
also
meet
the
minimum
standards
for
three
bedroom
units,
so
are
capable
of
conversion
by
a
simple
processor
for
the
introduction
of
a
partition
wall.
We
do
have
a
model
if
members
after
I
finish,
my
presentation
would
like
to
see
how
that's
how
that's
practically
achieved,
but
in
short,
it
basically
involves
the
a
knockout
panel
being
put
into
one
of
the
partitions
and
the
the
the
basically.
P
The
units
are
built
out
with
the
electrics
so
that
the
units
can
be
adapted
both
ways.
There
are
three
different
types
of
two
bed
units,
so
there
is
some
variety
in
the
scheme
about
where,
in
the
building
these
units
are
so
they're,
not
all
on
one
floor,
for
example,
they're,
Peppa
potty
throughout
this
game
and
I
don't
know.
Would
you
like
to
say
that
opportunity
now
to
see
that
model
yeah?
P
K
A
P
So
the
unit's
in
question
that
you've
just
had
a
demonstration
on
it,
I
highlighted
there
in
the
pink
and
the
blue
and
the
green.
So
you
can
see
that
there
is
art
at
the
ends
of
the
building
being
the
larger
of
the
of
the
units,
but
there
are
three
different
unit
types
that
effectively
follow
this.
So
it's
not
just
a
case
of
one
particular
unit
type
can
do
this.
There
are
slight
slight
changes
to
the
layout,
so
there's
a
bit
of
variety
in
there
as
well.
P
Next,
oh
I've
got
I've,
got
the
clicker
I'm
telling
Stitch
out
the
next
slide.
This
is
just
the
side-by-side
comparison
of
what
you've
just
seen,
so
I
won't
label
on
that
too
much.
But
it
gives
you
an
indication
of
the
the
room,
widths
and
distances,
all
of
which
still
meet
the
policy
requirement
and
again
that's
the
two
of
the
unit
types
and
then
this
just
gives
you
an
indication
three-dimensionally
of
some
of
the
elements
that
we've
been
talking
about.
P
So,
as
you
can
see
the
image
in
the
top
left
there
that
you,
you
just
recall
that
I
I
spoke
about
how
the
elevation
of
building
a
doesn't
actually
give
kind
of
a
proper
impression
about
how
that
building
sits
in
its
form.
Now,
that's
partly
a
wind
mitigation
reason
as
to
why
the
building
is
designed
in
that
way.
P
It
helps
to
Shield
the
center
part
of
the
site
from
these
high
winds,
but
it's
better
represented
in
three
dimensions:
the
the
third
image
at
the
top
there,
that's
just
to
give
you
an
idea
of
the
three-dimensional
dimensionality
of
each
of
the
three
buildings
window
units
at
each
Bay
and
then
the
build
the
image
at
the
top
right.
P
Those
are
the
biophilic
mitigation
structures
which
are
effectively
pieces
of
public
art
or
lands
that
can
be
Landscapes
that
can
be
planted
to
a
certain
extent
or
be
they've
got
to
retain
a
certain
level
of
porosity
but
they're
a
little
bit
novel
compared
to
some
of
the
sort
of
bug,
standard
flat
screens
that
we
generally
see
and
then
there's
some
material
samples.
Here
now
the
developer
has
brought
samples
and
if
you
wanted
to
see
those
at
the
end,
but
that
just
gives
you
an
idea
of
the
tonality
of
the
buildings.
P
It's
it's
quite
commonplace
now,
with
with
developments
in
this
area,
to
follow
that
that
terracotta,
brick
and
Portland
Stone
approach-
and
that's
that's
reflected
there
in
the
materials
of
the
three
buildings-
blocks
a
b
and
c.
P
But
then
this
just
sets
the
the
the
the
development
in
in
its
context
really.
This
is
this
is
going
to
be
taken
from
view
City
software,
which
is
what
we've
used
to
calculate
visibility
of
the
particular
the
tallest
of
the
three
buildings
of
four
to
two
stories.
It
gives
you
an
idea
of
what's
coming
on
stream
in
terms
of
height
and
how
this
sits.
P
So
the
the
the
graphical
three-dimensional
models
are
created
placed
into
the
three-dimensional
model
of
the
city,
and
then
we
then
use
that
to
work
out
visibility,
viewpoints
and
interface
with
Heritage
assets
in
the
city.
So
we
I'll
come
back
to
this
slide
shortly,
because
it's
it's
slightly
out
of
order.
P
But
what
we've
been
able
to
calculate
is
where
you'll
see
this
building
from
in
terms
of
some
of
the
key
Heritage
assets
and
to
what
extent
and
height
you'll
see,
particularly
the
total
of
the
three
buildings,
now
consider,
probably
the
most
key
Viewpoint
to
be
that
one
at
the
bottom
row
left
hand
side,
which
is
the
view
from
City
Square,
where
down
Wellington,
Street
and
the
view
City
software
that
we
used
and
the
technical
process
that
we
went
through
led
us
to
effectively
set
the
larger
portion
of
the
tallest
building
back
so
that
it
didn't
fully
terminate
the
Viewpoint
along
City
Square
down
Wellington
Street.
P
That
just
gives
you
a
flavor
of
the
sort
of
process
that
we've
gone
through,
and
it's
been
over
a
period
of
18
months
that
this
work's
been
undertaken
just
to
go
back
a
slide.
This
gives
you
an
idea
of
the
separation
distances
between
the
buildings.
P
We're
satisfied
that
this
is
in
keeping
with
sort
of
the
general
grade
and
character
of
large-scale
high
density
developments
around
the
city
center,
where
there
are
some
pinch
points.
For
example,
there's
a
13
and
a
half
meter,
pinch
point
there:
that's
between
a
lower
portion
of
the
building
and
a
stair
car,
so
the
design
of
the
buildings
are
the
way
that
they
splay
away
from
one
another
at
key.
P
Key
intervals
is
basically
to
design
out
in
practice
due
to
window
microclimber,
but
it's
to
design
out
points
of
proximity
between
the
buildings
where
you'd
get
winter
to
win
the
distances
that
were
less
than
ideal
and
you'll
notice
that,
whether
whether
at
the
shortest
points
they're
only
there
are
points
rather
than
long.
Extensive
elevation,
so
you're
not
basically
faced
with
long
areas
that
create
a
tunnel
in
effect,
and
it's
very
very
similar
to
the
approach
that
was
taken
in
the
layout
at
Lisbon.
Street.
P
This
just
to
go
back
again
gives
you
an
idea
of
how
that
3D
rendering
manifests
itself.
So
we
can
make
these
Assessments
in
terms
of
where
buildings
will
sit
on
the
skyline.
So
this
is,
for
example,
at
Hanover
Square,
where
the
buildings
would
would
not
interfere
or
be
really
visually
any
taller
than,
for
example,
Marlborough
towers
and
would
sit
quietly
in
the
backdrop
rather
than
interfere
with
the
sort
of
more
residential
scale.
Heritage
environment.
P
This
is
to
demonstrate
The,
Pedestrian
connectivity.
A
key
component
of
the
site
is
the
provision
of
the
Riverside
walkway,
which,
although
we're
dealing
with
as
a
separate
Plumbing
application,
would
be
linked
via
grampian
condition
that
we're
still
working
on
the
precise
wording
for
to
effectively
link
its
delivery
with
the
delivery
of
Block
C
in
the
site.
But
this
is
basically
gives
a
flavor
of
as
we've
just
looked
at
a
site
at
kirkstall
Road
how
you
would
interface
with
with
kirkstall
Road.
P
One
key
point
to
know
is
that
block
a
has
a
diagonal
group
through
its
base,
so
the
building
splits
at
ground
floor
to
provide
a
clean
pedestrian
route
across
West
Street
into
the
center
of
the
site.
Should
you
prefer,
but
also
the
Riverside
walkway,
which
starts
at
the
news
configured
site
access
at
the
left
hand,
side
of
the
site
and
would
eventually
wind
its
way.
P
All
the
way
down
past
Wellington,
Place
predicated
on
the
delivery
of
the
later
phases
of
their
scheme
and
then
across
to
monk
Bridge,
which
you
can
see
that
that
transition
in
blue
there
is
a
Footbridge
planned
as
part
of
the
later
phases
of
Wellington
place.
But
there
is
also
now
a
vertical
Link
in
place
between
Wellington
Place
and
monk
Bridge.
P
So
this
is
really
that
this
site
is
is
doing
its
bits
in
terms
of
the
provision
of
of
a
continuous
route,
all
the
way
down
the
Riverside
and
eventually
terminating
all
the
way
out
of
the
train
station.
P
That
just
demonstrates
what
I've
just
been
talking
about,
that
there
are
effectively
a
number
of
pedestrian
routes
round
and
about
the
buildings.
The
larger
extensive
glazed
elevation
at
the
ends
of
the
buildings
will
will
improve
natural
surveillance
in
these
areas,
particularly
around
that
micro
forest
and
we're
working
with
West
Yorkshire
police
through
what
will
hopefully
be
the
conditions
process
to
get
a
management
regime.
This
is
a
managed
estate,
there's
a
bill
to
rent
management
regime
and
obviously
the
two
student
blocks.
P
So
there's
going
to
be
on-site
management
of
of
that
that
forested
area,
the
forest
is
not
we're
not
proposing
that
that's
going
to
be
open
and
open
air,
it's
a
densely
planted
area,
but
obviously
managing
how
the
the
the
the
peripheral
treatment
around
the
edge
of
it
to
deter
people
sleeping
in
there
Etc.
That's
still
we're
still
working
through
that
with
West
Yorkshire
police,
we'll
do
that
through
the
competition
discharge
process.
But
ultimately
it
is
a
managed
to
State.
P
There
will
be
operatives
on
site,
so
in
terms
of
safety,
it
has
been
closely
looked
at.
P
P
Obviously
key
for
all
of
these
schemes
is
the
provision
of
play
Space.
So
the
applicant
has
asked
me
to
direct
you
to
the
fact
that
they're
very
flexible
in
terms
of
the
the
typology
of
play
equipment
that
goes
on
there.
They
very
much
feel
as
though
World
members
know
best
for
what's
what's
in
this
particular
area,
we're
proposing
a
competition
to
deal
with
this
through
the
Landscaping
treatment.
P
But
there
is
a
large-scale
dedicated
area
around
Block
C,
specifically
going
to
be
dedicated
for
play
on
site
and
obviously,
whilst
City
Center
development's
done
often
in
terms
of
three
bed.
Accommodation
immediately
appeal
to
families,
it's
more
of
sharers
in
this
kind
of
location,
but
there
is
the
possibility
that
will
be
families
moving
to
the
site.
So
it
has
been
considered
it's
quite
an
extensive
area
and
that
will
be
managed
through
the
accomplishments
process
as
well,
so
that
we
get
the
right
type
of
equipment
and
a
variety
of
equipment
in
terms
of
cycling.
P
There
are
two
main
cycle
hubs
in
terms
of
storage
where
one
in
Block
C,
both
of
which
are
capable
of
expansion,
as
I've
said
previously,
two
car
club
spaces
along
the
central
spine
of
the
site,
three
disabled
car
parking
spaces,
but
otherwise
this
development
is
car
free,
it's
in
a
highly
sustainable
location.
It
follows
the
pattern,
for
example,
of
the
latitude
development,
that's
gone
on
the
South
Bank,
whereby
it's
all
about
improving
pedestrian
connectivity
and
cycle
connectivity.
P
P
This
scheme
extends
to
cycle
Super
Highway
up
to
the
edge
of
City
Island
next
I'm
saying
next
slide
again
and
I've
got
the
clicker
that
just
gives
you
an
indication
again
of
the
expansion
capacity
of
both
blocks,
a
and
block
cycle
storage,
both
of
which
well
it's
ground,
floor
cycle
storage
at
Block,
C,
but
block
a
will
contain
a
lift,
as
we
know
them
previously,
with
developments
the
idea
of
moving
bikes
up
ramps,
Etc,
it's
it's
it's
less
than
ideal.
P
So
whilst
there
will
be
widened
staircases
within
there
is
also
the
provision
of
lift
and
platform
lifting
there.
P
And
then
this
just
gives
a
flavor
of
the
Landscaping
proposals
around
the
base
of
Block
C,
as
I
say,
the
the
landscape
proposals
for
the
Riverside
Walker
to
be
dealt
with
it
as
part
of
a
separate
application,
but
the
typology
and
design
of
that
is
more
or
less
already
agreed.
P
I
mean
we're
we're
moving
towards
sort
of
being
able
to
approve
that
application,
and
it's
largely
been
set
by
block
D
the
headline
building
actually
delivering
its
section
of
that
Riverside
walkway
already
and
members
that
were
on
the
site
visit
this
morning,
will
have
seen
that
eventually,
the
plan
is
that
the
Riverside
Wall
comes
down
once
holistically.
The
whole
thing
can
be
delivered
together
and
then
the
the
stairs
and
ramp
Arrangement
the
effectively
becomes
part
of
fast
and
we're
able
to
effectively
open
that
that
Riverside
walk
out.
P
P
There
we
go
so
the
again.
The
the
benedom-esque
umbrella
structures
are,
in
fact
the
biophilic
structures
that,
with
the
final
finalized
detail,
design
and
I'll
be
worked
up
through
the
conditions.
P
And
the
game
they're
around
about
70
additional
Street
trees,
notwithstanding
the
introduction
of
the
micro
Forest,
which
will
deliver
quite
a
few
hundred
trees
in
a
dense
Arrangement.
But
even
though
we
normally
leave
these
two
conditions,
the
developer
wanted
to
make
clear
to
us
all
that
they
are
thinking
about
substructure,
Etc
and
having
proper
provision.
P
So
it's
all
being
looked
at
together
with
the
provision
of
services
across
the
site
and
it's
being
looked
at
in
a
joined
up
way,
the
proposing
large
canopy
species
and,
as
I
say,
that's
70
additional
trees
on
what
is
effectively
a
cleared
site
at
the
moment.
So
there's
a
big
biodiversity
benefit
there.
P
This
is
the
microforest.
This
gives
cops
wood.
This
gives
you
an
idea
of
that
something
of
it
is
a
hiriaki
method.
I
think
I'm
a
miriaki
method
of
my
pronounce
it
pronounced
that
correctively,
but
it
basically
involves
tiered,
dense
planting
to
maximize
canopy.
P
This
was
discussed
at
the
pre-application
inquiry,
there's
a
condition
regarding
the
the
finalized
details
of
this.
It's
a
specialist
company
that
generally
comes
in
and
delivers
this,
but
its
location
has
been
chosen
there
specifically
because
if
you
notice
just
adjacent
to
it,
you're
on
the
slip
Road
from
Wellington
Bridge
Street
onto
the
onto
the
inner
Ring
Road
and
as
vehicles
are
moving
from
low
speed
to
high
speed
there
and
that's
likely
to
be
a
high
pollutant
area.
P
So
it's
basically
going
to
assist
with
managing
the
amount
of
pollutant
take-up
that
can
be
taken
into
the
site,
so
it
effectively
acts
not
only
as
a
green
buffer
in
an
area
of
the
site,
that's
probably
very
difficult
to
deliver
anything
meaningful
there,
but
it
it
some
clear
thoughts
being
given
to
maximizing
sort
of
pollutant
intake
in
that
location
and
then
something
that's
important
to
a
number
of
us
in
leads,
not
least
of
all
me.
My
grandfather
works
at
that
building
for
30
years.
P
I've
got
fond
memories
of
visiting
that
building
on
a
number
of
occasions,
including
just
before
it
was
demolished.
Something
that's
very
important
to
us
all.
Is
the
clock
tower
what
we
do
with
it
and
I'm
going
to
be
very,
very
straight
with
you
at
the
moment,
we're
not
100
certain
about
what
is
achievable
in
terms
of
retaining
the
actual
Clock
Tower
head.
P
It
has
been
investigated.
We've
got
a
condition
proposed
to
deal
with
that
in
some
form
or
other.
The
applicant
has
committed
to
retaining
a
clock
tower
head
on
the
site.
The
likelihood
is,
it
will
probably
be
delivered
as
part
of
one
of
the
two
large-scale
wind
columns
which
are
around
about
25
to
30
meters
in
high
once
25
months,
30
meters.
But
then
this
leads
to
another
series
of
questions
in
terms
of
Heritage
of
the
city,
because
that
clock
tower
head.
That's
there
at
the
moment.
That's
not
the
original
one.
P
P
The
developer
does
believe
that
it's
technically
possible
to
sever
it
from
the
rest
of
the
tower,
lift
it
down
refurbish
it
replace
it,
but
we're
just
not
100
clear
on
that
at
the
moment
and
if
that's
not
going
to
be
possible,
then
there's
a
case
towards
making
a
facsimile
of
it,
where
you
could
probably
use
a
different
faces
of
its
different
ages
across
the
years
as
part
of
the
rebuilt
structure,
there
is
even
a
thought
to
maybe
doing
something:
digital
up
there
whereby
you
could
it
could
change
over
time.
P
It
could
have
a
new
face
members
views
on
that
a
saw,
obviously,
but
but
it
is
acknowledged
that,
whilst
the
original
iteration
of
this
scheme
sought
to
preserve
it
and
keep
it
where
it
is
because
of
these
wind
and
microclimate
issues,
we've
got
it's
got
to
come
down
that
Tower's
got
to
come
down,
I
mean
it's
very
poorly
dressed
at
the
moment
anyway,
and
it's
got
to
be
sort
of
either
reimagined
or
rebuilt
somewhere
else
on
the
site.
There
are
two
clear
opportunities
to
do
that
around
the
site:
periphery.
P
P
So
it
would
still
be
recognizable
as
the
Yorkshire
post,
but
it
can't
that
that
question
just
can't
be
answered
today,
a
lot
of
it's
going
to
be
down
to
the
technical,
concentrate
of
getting
the
thing
down
and
then
just
in
terms
of
the
the
composition
that
gives
you
a
flavor
of
the
the
scale
of
the
three
buildings
and
just
to
move
to
the
last
couple
of
images.
This
is
it
as
in
isolation,
but
also
with
regard
to
bridge
house,
which
has
recently
been
approved
as
well.
P
A
And
thank
you
Matt
for
that
very
full
and
interesting
presentation.
I'm
sure
there'll
be
many
questions,
particularly
about
the
tower
it'd,
be
interesting
to
hear
your
views
again.
There's
no
objectives,
so
we
could
bring
yeah
the
applicants
forward
for
any
questions,
that's
beyond
the
expertise
of
our
people
or
maybe
to
tease
out
some
more
benefits
as
you're
very
good.
At
doing
so,
can
I
invite
members
to
ask
those
questions
and
I've
got
Kaylee.
H
I've
got
a
few,
so
I
think
I.
Think
first
of
all
has
has
a
wind
impact
assessment
been
done
on
the
surrounding
buildings,
including
City
Island,
because
because,
obviously
it's
quite
a
large
structure,
it's
going
to
mess
around
with
with
the
wind.
H
That's
my
first
one.
Second
one
you
touched
on
natural
surveillance
and
safety
can
I
just
get
some,
maybe
a
little
bit
more
information
around
that.
Will
there
be
CCTV
like
what
sort
of
level
are
we
talking
about?
Will
there
be
sort
of
CCTV?
That's
been
watched
all
the
time,
or
is
it
simply
a
case
of
someone
going
around
the
perimeter
once
an
hour
or
whatever
right?
H
H
Sort
of
a
Part
B
of
my
question
is:
is
there
any
use
class
units
that
would
be
appropriate
for
a
new
medical
facility
being
included
in
the
development
and
I?
Think
I'll
leave
it
at
that,
because
that's
too
much.
P
On
the
first
point,
I
mean
wind
is
the
driver
for
the
design
and
layout
of
this
site
and
its
surrounding
areas,
and
has
that
is
the
reason
why
that
development
is
stalled
and
hoarded
and
has
been
for
a
number
of
years.
You
know
it's
been
to
a
very
rigorous
process
involving
a
variety
of
different
wind
tunnel
tests
and
what
yeah.