►
Description
Displaying errors in the grid body
Saving already licensed image
Licensed label
MFTF tests performance
MFTF tests for licensing images
Bugfixes
A
B
B
Yeah,
so
this
story
was
about
showing
the
authentication
you
know
message
inside
of
the
Adobe
stock
integration
agreed
that
the
caller
agreed
to
previously
in
case
of
the
authentication
error
without
this
message,
but
we
didn't
have
degree.
So
the
idea
was
to
show
this
read
this
message
inside
of
the
degree
and
to
introduce
something
lo
for
pushing
matched
messages
from
backhand
to
this
grid,
in
order
to
show
them
in
case
of
different
error
scenarios
and
after
the
implementation.
B
If
we
have
incorrect
potentials
computing
admin
panel,
if
we
try
to
search
at
all,
this
talk
will
have
the
error
message
inside
of
the
grid.
So,
as
you
can
see
you
given
in
case
of
the
arrow,
you
see
the
grid,
you
see
how
the
grid
loop
looks
like
and,
as
I
said,
we
provided
the
flow
which
allows
us
to
show
other
messages
inside
of
the
clear
block,
so
that
that's
basically
it.
If
you
have
any
questions,
please
ask.
A
Thank
you
that
looks
perfect,
put
them,
of
course,
perfect,
at
least
for
my
tests
and
yeah.
This
useful
addition
will
be
able
to
handle
errors
in
future
much
more
like
in
a
proper
way,
for
example,
loading
the
next
page.
We
can
show
the
error
in
the
grid
instead
of
removing
the
grid
and
show
in
the
blank
page,
that's
freely
a
step
forward
towards
user
experience.
From
my
point
of
view,.
C
Yes,
maybe
just
okay,
so
the
previous
week
was
full
of
really
interesting
and
constructive.
Stuff
and
I
would
like
just
to
talk
just
to
talk
about
the
first
one,
so
we
have
been
working
together.
This
fergie
on
this
one
I
mean
just
remove
database
records
when
dementia
is
deleted
from
the
media
gallery.
So
this
is
a
major
update
for
our
gallery
module.
C
So
it
was
really
exciting
work
and
we
also
fix
it
a
lot
of
static
tests,
because
just
our
the
Bisto
configuration
already
connected
to
them
magenta
test
infrastructure.
We
have
a
fool
who
miss
a
whole
picture
of
tests
and
we
fix
it
a
lot
next
I
just
work
it
on
refactoring,
I,
graduated
storage
actions
into
inclusive
protections.
Previously
we
had
one
class
which
was
responsible
for
several
actions
but
to
make
it
more
powerful
with
this
regulation.
C
Yes,
and
all
this
stuff
was
just
for
one
sink,
we
prepared
to
updated
media
gallery
module
and
there
you
go
Sergey
opened
that
pull
request
to
the
Magento
data.
So
it's
how,
as
I
understood
the
first
one
and
I
would
like
to
I
would
like
to
say
thank
you
Paul
orgasm
guys
it
was.
It
was
really
amazing
to
work
on
this
application
and
I.
Think
that
Sergey.
Can
you
please
describe
this
thing
beautiful
thing.
C
A
Yes,
so
basically,
it's
the
same
media
get
Adobe,
Media
gallery
and
adobe
media
galleries,
API
modules
that
we've
seen
before,
but
which
enter
name
space
and
are
trying
to
deliver
those
modules
to
Magento
to
to
mainly
to
be
able
to
associate
attributes
from
these
images
in
media
gallery
in
magenta
core,
so
that
we
can
improve
Magento
media
gallery
and
enhance
magenta
media
gallery
UI
in
future
in
in
actually
not
in
so
distant
future.
We
are
planning
to
do
it
in
the
next
milestone
right
after
stabilization
of
this
one.
A
So
we
actually,
we
do
have
to
pull
requests
open
to
magenta
Zuri's,
a
mercenary
and
the
great
components
that
delivery
to
magenta
to
so
we
are
delivering
the
content
of
other
bui
model
that
is
current
in
the
other
bistec
integration.
They
created
the
BI
model
specifically
to
extract
the
common
components
for
magenta
core,
so
it
contains
on
the
four
components
and
four
templates
for
these
components:
its
image
preview-
that
is,
the
basic
image
preview.
A
Without
any
actions,
related
images
and
stuff,
like
that,
just
an
image
navigation
buttons
forward
backwards,
then
in
each
column,
that
is
required
by
master
grid
grid
overlay
column
that
can
be
used
to
put
labels
over
images
and
for
sure
the
listing
implementation
itself.
So
we
went
through
the
code
review
in
magenta
repository.
There
were
lots
of
comments
from
from
the
architects
and
we
have
adjusted
ever
since
she
looks
to
be
looking
to
merge
this
poll
question.
A
A
A
D
A
A
A
E
F
E
A
E
E
E
Then
it
expand
the
image
preview,
though,
that
the
federal
clip
from
an
image,
then
it
just
grabs
the
final
number
bomb,
the
the
grid
and
then
tricks
next
click
on
the
seed,
the
more
from
this
model,
the
see
more
button.
So
while
you
I'll
show
you
this
in
a
second
show
me
an
actual
and
then
what
works
then
testing
for
us
will
wave
the
grid
to
reload
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that
the
applying
filter
actually
has
the
values.
E
So
the
varlet,
the
final
ID
that
we
grab
here
is
actually
now
the
filter
for
the
model.
Id.
We
make
sure
that
the
one
that
we
make
philately
the
number
has
changed
from
the
default
mounting
the
filtered
amount.
So
here's
a
test,
the
relative,
he
seems
successful,
see
my
unfollow
them
I'll.
Guess
it
will
see
how
successful
it's
it
does
take
about
five
minutes
more
like
a
view,
so
we
don't
have
to
wait
the
whole
kitchen,
but
when
you
first
get
going,
you
will
see
it
or
1e3
the
bracelet.
E
E
E
E
If
you
want,
because
all
it
does
now,
is
it
actually
resets
the
filter
features?
Some
of
the
test
is
that
the
BAM
vampires
resetting
the
filter
back
to
normal,
so
that
any
future
tests,
bong
saying
on
other
default
filter
ball
is
going
to
do
now
is
reset
a
filter
and
logout,
and
that's
that's
the
pilot
test,
but
you
can
see
that
the
model
ID
is
click
selected
correctly
and
that's
the
test
room.
E
A
Wait
to
tribuna
stone,
much
spurt
in
em
FTF
as
well,
however,
like
theoretically
like
actually,
we
are
not
changing
the
page
at
that
place.
We
are
just
working
with
small
slide-out
panels.
That's
why
I
think
that
maybe
we
can
go,
we
can
try
to
go
without
wait
for
page
two
loads,
yes
possible,
I'm,
not
sure
I
feel
I
know
he
started
working
with
image.
H
H
I
There,
at
least
on
my
local
instance,
I,
had
to
introduce
an
additional
wait
for
page
two
loads
as
the
media
gallery.
Perhaps
it's
only
on
my
instance,
but
the
media
gallery
seems
low
twice
the
once
for
the
media
gallery,
UI
to
load
and
then
once
that
loads,
then
the
loading
modal
triggers
again
and
your
images
that
you've
saved
your
media
gallery
load
the
second
time
so
I
needed
to
introduce
an
additional
weight
to
get
the
test
passing
locally.
E
I
I
I
A
Probably,
where
possible
we
have
to
dent
where
it
is
actually
logical.
We
have
to
replace
worth
wait
for
page
to
load
is
wait
for
element
because
wait
for
page
to
load
looks
like
sometimes
it's
gauged
the
reloading
of
whatever
we're
waiting
for,
and
sometimes
it
just
misses
it,
and
then
it
waits
30
seconds
until
for
10
seconds,
depending
on
specific
configuration
until
the
timeout
and
then
continues
the
test.
That
is
wise.
B
So
yeah
I
believe
you
can
create
an
issue.
This
matters
so
I
can
review
the
test
performance.
Maybe
I
will
have
some
suggestions:
how
to
speed
up
the
dam,
because
it's
really
hard
to
say
right
now.
What
is
the
reason
of
slowness,
but
I
was
working
on
performance
optimizations
of
an
FDF
tests
on
some
projects,
or
maybe
I'll
have
some
suggestions
for
this
case.
Oh.
A
A
D
F
Begin
with
the
pr
licence
overlay
level
starting
to
match,
mock-up,
which
we
have
started
almost
about
12
days
ago,
which
is
very
complex
because,
as
we
first
did
this
using
the
GS
but
as
per
suggest
comment,
we
need
to
do
this
using
a
CSS.
So
it
takes
really
complex
to
do
this
with
the
CSS,
but,
as
we
have
achieved
this
year
with
CSS,
but
we
still
have
the
problem
with
the
liver.
So
I
can
demonstrate
the
license
level
right
now.
It
looks
much
better,
but
not
bad,
as
in
the
previous
demo,
in
mafia.
F
H
D
F
I
know
no,
it's
another
request
I
just
working
on
it.
I
really
want
to
show
that
demo.
It's
a
license.
Overlay
well,
are
not
updated
when
this
its
I
am
working
on
it,
but
I
think
I
created
the
feedback.
Changes
I
just
committed
the
fit
basis,
I
think
just
there
is
only
one
feedback
that
I
just
implemented
in
the
Adobe:
a
mess
signing
module.
I
am
s
model,
but
as
it's
a
part
of
a
pedo
stach
admin
UI.
F
F
F
G
D
D
General,
no,
it's
it's!
It's
just
a
heavier
request
because
it
has
to
go
back
to
IMS
and
check
your
ownership
of
all
these
assets
and
I
think
some
other
customers
might
have
implemented
it
where
they
do
it
as
a
separate
request,
so
they
load
the
thumbnails
and
then
afterwards
they
do
a
lazy
request
to
get
the
license
status,
but
that
you
know
it's
more.
It's
a
lot
heavier
to
do
that
in
implementation,
wise
anyway,
I
was
just
curious.
A
F
A
low
position,
yeah
I,
have
a
question
regarding
our
regarding
some
user
experience,
as
currently
as
you
can
see
that
this
is
a
big
thumbnail
image,
but
the
same
is
appeared
here
to
click
on
this
at
nothing
appears,
and
if
you
click
on
this,
then
it's
changes.
Then
it's
come
back
to
here.
So
can
we
remove
this?
So
user?
F
Have
one
more
option
to
see
the
mode
from
this
series,
as
you
can
see
the
currently
stock.com
as
they
have
implemented
our
different
images
from
this
series,
as
you
can
see
there
are
there,
is
on
one
more
options.
User
to
you
can
see
this
from
the
series.
Currently
we
have
the
same
image,
which
is
visible
over
more
from
the
series.
F
So
can
we
remove
this
and
so
that
I
use
has
one
more
option
for
the
image,
but
if
this
is
the
issue-
or
we
need
to
fix
this,
so
there
should
be
need,
create
a
poll
request
it's
in
the
magenta
or
the
ad,
always
speaking
here.
They
all
seems
to
fix.
This
issue
like
here
does
not
have
the
same.
Imagine
more
than
this
in,
but
then
you
able
to
answer
this.
A
Yeah,
let's
show
that's
actually
so.
The
first
question
is:
if
the
if
here
looking
for
series
of
images
and
the
ID,
for
example,
a
series
of
images
for
ID
one
shoot,
the
image
reside
avanti
present
in
results
of
the
series,
all
theoretical,
it's
the
same
theory
from
the
same
theory
or
if
it's
so
it
should
be
in
the
collection
in
the
same
series
right
logically.
Yes,
yes,
that's
right,
probably
that's
not
an
issue
of
SDK
and
what
we
can
do
in
this
case.
F
D
I'm
looking
at
a
stock
for
the
same
for
the
same
content,
it
appears
that
a
stock
hides
the
first
one,
I
mean
I'm,
guessing
I,
don't
have
money.
I,
don't
haven't
used
this
API
much
but
I'm,
guessing
that
the
first
image
that
comes
back
may
be
the
same
ID
and
on
the
stock
website.
It
looks
like
they
hide
that
unless
you
go
to
see
more
and
then
I'm
guessing,
then
you
can
see
everything
but
yeah.
It
looks
like
they.
It
looks
like
they
hide
the
first
one.
F
D
F
Pressing
escape
key
pressing
escape
t
confirm
the
sale
and
license
perform
as
you
as
we
are
try
to
escape.
They
are
try
to
like
this
save
and
press
the
escape.
It
tries
to
save
so
I
just
found
out
that
it
is
an
issue
in
the
Magento
repo,
so
I
have
created
the
PR
PR
in
the
modular
repository
and
I
have
fixed.
It
first
just
need
to
review
and
much
to
the
merchants
of
so
we
will
fix
this
issue.
I
have
just
fixed
over
here.
F
G
F
A
F
H
Okay,
so
let
me
go
ahead
that
a
bunch
of
fears
and
a
few
doubts
I
have
though
Oh
one
of
my
peers
were.
If
the
user
has
enough
credits,
then
the
confirmation
model
has
an
input
field,
save
the
file
name,
and
if
the
user
does
not
have
enough
credits,
then
there
is
no
point
of
the
fields
name,
the
input
field,
name,
because
you
know
he
cannot
save
the
image
he
needs
to
buy
the
credits.
H
So
that's
one
of
my
peers
and
another
one
was
a
unit
test
for
Magento
adobe
media
gallery
model
as
it
come
and
save
so
that's
pretty
much
just
a
code
and
another
one
which
is
yet
to
be
merged
but
completed
is
an
MFT
of
test
for
testing.
If
the
user
can
locate
preview
saved
and
a
licensed
image
so
that
I
just
finished
testing
and
yeah
it
past
year
again
it
takes
a
lot
of
time,
so
I
guess
I'll
skip
that,
but
yep
and
just
a
second
yeah.
H
Another
PR
was
the
sanitized
the
file
names
to
exclude
special
characters.
So
it
will
accept
yeah.
It
will
accept
only
alphanumeric,
dashes
and
underscores,
and
if
there
are
two
unlatches
which
have
been
like
replaced,
then
it
will
get
replaced
with
one
underscore:
I
mean
one.
So
I
have
fixed
that
too,
and.
H
So
what
my
doubts
are
is
that
one
of
the
doubts,
for
example,
in
the
after
section
of
the
MFT
of
tests,
these
relative
to
where
the
screen
is
at
the
end
of
the
test,
so
I'm
wondering
if
they
should
be
stateless,
just
like
admin
log
Otis.
So
this
will
fail
this
after
action
will
fail.
If
my
tests
stop
somewhere
in
the
middle,
so
I'm
wondering
where
to
put
this.
H
Whether
to
you
know
just
include
it
here
at
the
end
of
the
test,
because
there
should
be
executed
only
if
this
executes
so
do
you
guys
have
any
suggestions
as
to
how
to
make
the
stateless
again.
This
action
group
can
execute
only
if
I'm
in
the
Adobe
stock
grid
page
and
not,
if
I'm,
in
a
media
glare
gallery
page.
So
any
idea
on
how
I
would
solve
that.
A
H
H
H
I
H
I
I
H
I
H
H
H
A
H
A
Can
you
see
my
screen
yep?
Yes,
so
here
is
how
it
like
for
me.
So,
probably
not
just
extending
the
I
mean
who
the
problem
could
be
not
exactly
the
extending
the
lens
or
adding
more
space
to
certain
option
blood
to
removing
that
border
and
from
just
changing
styles
of
how
certain
is
displayed
in
as
well
so
looks
like
the
CSS
is
not
covering
all
the
process.
A
F
H
I
Something
that
on
cars
brought
up
issues
around
with
TS
tests
and
which
I
think
is
pretty
important
to
address
since
we're
gearing
up
adding
more
tests
and
getting
ready
to
publicize
the
functional
tests
in
our
builds
was
what
Adobe,
stock
IMS
account
or
Adobe
IMS
account
to
use
with
stock
or
testing
purposes.
This
particularly
comes
up
when
we're
running
the
tests
that
rely
on
light
images
being
already
licensed
so
I
think
that's
something
we
should
discuss
and
think
about
and
cope
with
ideas
on
how
to
approach,
because
there's
a
couple
options
I
see
one.
I
Is
that
we're
given
some
kind
of
special
account
that
allows
us
to
license
things
as
much
as
we
want
and
I
know
there
are
costs
associated
with
that.
So
I,
don't
know
if
that's
prohibitive
or
not.
The
other
option
is
to
have
an
Adu,
an
Adobe
IMS
account
that
has
very
specific
images,
pre
licensed,
and
that
is
then
hard-coded
or
built
into
our
test
suite
so
that
our
tests
know
when
to
expect
or
which
images
to
look
for
to
find
the
ones
that
are
previously,
for
example,
license
but
not
saved,
etc,
etc.
I
I
D
I
D
It's
stock.
We
use
our
staging
environment,
which
doesn't
is
not
linked
to
any
payment,
but
that's
internal
to
Adobe,
so
you
wouldn't
be
able
to
access
that
I
mean
I.
Think
other
customers
just
use
static
data
because
I
mean
I
have
a
lot
of
partners
and
customers
using
the
API
and
they
don't.
They
don't
generally
go
over
their
quota
that
we
give
them
so
I'm
guessing
that
they
just
you
know
they
just
call
those
same
images
over
and
over
again
that
have
already
been
previously
licensed.
D
D
And
I'm
not
sure
how
we
would
I
mean
ID,
ideally
would
stay
fixed,
though
you
would
always
get
back
the
same
results,
but
then
that
means
that
developers
shouldn't
be
using
it.
Ideally,
they
can't
use
it
because
they
don't
have
credentials
to
it,
but
I'm
not
sure
how
that
would
work
and
you're
on
your
side.
So
if
you
guys
want
to
think
about
that,
could
just
be
a
gentleman's
honor
or
lady's
honor.
That
sort
of
thing
not
to
use
it,
but
but
yeah
I
mean
basically
in
our
side.
D
D
Yeah
we
just
so
you
guys
know
that
the
payout
is
turned
off
on
this
account.
So
when
you
license
stuff,
no
one
actually
is
getting
paid.
So
that's
good
for
development.
Of
course
you
know.
It
also
means
that
if
you
use
that
image
somewhere
other
than
in
this
environment,
we
could
all
get
sued.
So
don't
don't
don't
download
and
put
it
on
a
blog
or
something.
But
you
know
you
bet.
I
That
gives
us
an
answer:
we'll
have
a
lockdown
account
with
very
specific
state,
maybe
just
one
or
two
or
three
or
however
many
we
need
images
relicensed
and,
of
course,
these
credentials
would
not
be
shared
with
anyone.
They'd
be
stored,
ideally
in
a
like
secret
secure
place,
and
only
the
testing
infrastructure
would
access.
It
may
would
not
be
supposed.
J
Have
such
like,
oh,
we
already
have
some
such
repositories
where
we
store
credentials
for
the
testing
infrastructure,
but
these
this
repository
is
internal
and
it's
not
publicly
like
not
accessible
for
public
only
for
our
Jenkins
build.
So,
for
example,
if
you
want
to
run
this
test
suit
on
your
local
machine,
you
probably
won't
have
access
to
it.
That's
the
limitation
right,
but
at
least
such
credentials
are
not
exposed
to
any
like
any
more
big
construction.
D
H
D
Don't
know
if
that's,
if
that's
a
necessary
in
a
real-world
situation,
I
mean,
if
you
can
do
a
user
I
mean
all
that
would
test
is
whether
they
have
additional
quota
or
not,
but
essentially
all
the
licensing
api's
rely
on
they
all
they
all
sort
of
have
the
same
workflow
behind
the
scenes.
If
you've
previously
license
an
image,
you
should
be
able
to
call
and
license
it
again,
you
so
that
you
could
relicense
it,
but
then
that
uses
another
credit,
but
you
should
be
able
to
always
access
that
item.
D
Mean
I
would
expect
if
you
license
if
the
image
has
been
license
once
and
you
go
to,
and
you
run
the
license
again.
If
you
run
license
own
I
think
it
should
just
say:
you've
already
license
this
image,
but
it
should
succeed.
If
it
fails,
then
it
means
that
somehow
the
credentials
have
become
corrupt
or
your
or
this
the
you
know
it's
not
in
a
good
state
or
you've
sent
it
a
malformed
request
or
something
like
that.
D
H
D
F
D
J
Also
I
would
suggest
to
cover
session
areas,
not
by
functional
test
but
by
but
by
integration,
because
in
this
case
we
can
use
the
mock
data
instead
of
real
data,
and
we
don't
need
to
care
about
accounts.
Don't
need
to
care
how
to
realize,
like,
like
my
license,
a
gay
or
lies
in
the
image,
so
we
just
will
provide
any
data
which
we
need
yeah.
D
I
mean
in
our
side
we
only
use
unit
tests
for
very
limited
what,
when
it
comes
to
things
that
use
api's,
we
really
only
rely
on
integration
test.
The
unit
tests
are
just
pretty
basic
to
make
sure
that
you're
throwing
an
error
or
something
like
that,
but
but
they
don't
actually
interact
with
any
other
service,
and
then
we
use
the
integration
test.
D
For
that,
but
it's
still
a
good
point.
You
know
how
do
you
deal
with
the
situation
where
you
know
you're
in
one
UI
state?
You
want
to
change
to
the
other
if
you
still
have
an
integration
test
for
that,
you
would
want
to
have
you'd
want
to
have
a
state
for
both.
You
know
the
unlicensed
state
and
the
licensed
state
and
I
suppose
yeah
I
mean
I.
Think
mock
data
would
probably
work
better
there.
If
you
didn't
get
back
on
of.
J
J
D
Good
and
I
mean
I'm
working
on
a
similar
exercise.
I
use
in
my
integration
tests.
I
have
a
test.
I
have
some
tests
that
use
rely
on
static
data
to
always
give
that
consistent
results
and
then
another
API
that
I
call
that
that
actually,
you
know,
gets
real
data,
but
I'm
feeling
we
may
need
to
mix
and
match,
like
you
suggest.
That
might
be
the
best
solution.
A
Yeah,
we
actually
thought
about
implementing
the
stop
that
will
replace
the
SDK
for
our
model
for
testing,
to
prevent
communication
to
directory-based,
okay
play
and
run
tests
on
mocked
data,
but
that's
something
that
we
know
it.
Just
don't
have
right
now
and
I'm,
not
sure
where
we
will
be
able
to
implement
it.
Do
discuss
this
piece
at
actual
call
before
I
believe
there
is
actually
a
task
on
our
in
our
better.
Yes,.
C
A
A
C
I
also
think
that
this
is
a
good
idea.
Sorry,
if
I
interject,
that
just
because
in
arena
in
general,
we
just
make
a
call
to
the
Adobe
stock
service,
so
we
just
can
create
how
mix-ins
and
or
not
make
sense,
but
we
can
just
create
our
stop
yes
and
based
on
already
existed
response,
and
this
will
cover
a
lot
of
cases
and
evil
not
be
dependent
on
a
network.
Connection
is
again,
you
say
so.
I
think
that
this
is
a
really
good
idea
and
also
we
can
use
it
in
our
integration
phase
for
future.
C
Oh,
this
sounds
like
a
really
good
idea
to
have
this
function
out
and
you
can
cover
connection
to
the
Adobe
SDK
with
another
pool
of
tests.
So
just
those
tests
will
cover
our
connection
to
the
Adobe
stock
service
and
another
pool
of
tests
will
cover
just
functionality.
Also.
This
will
indicate
that
in
Adobe
stock
we
have
some
changes.
A
A
Any
search
query
you,
the
collection,
ID
filter
is
dropped
and
all
the
images
are
available
for
searching.
Also
the
gallery
filter
is
not
applied
to
request
for
related
and
correlated
images
like
series
and
model
images.
This
request,
for
those
images,
are
done
without
any
search
request
as
well
and.
A
One
more
important
improvement
by
Sergei
jr.:
he
have
implemented
saving
the
licensed
the
functionality
to
save
the
image
that
was
already
licensed
on
the
stock
side.
So,
right
now,
when
the
image
is
licensed
under
the
stock,
instead
of
having
license
and
Save
button,
you'll
see
just
Save
button
and
no
additional
dialogues
to
confirm
the
licensing.
The
image
will
be
saved
straight
to
the
gallery.
After
after
clicking
the
Save
button,
I
think
that's
it
for
the
function
for
the
implemented
functionality.
A
A
A
A
Not
all
of
the
tests
are
green
at
the
moment,
so
it's
static,
static
tests
that
actually
have
been
fixed
recently.
They
were
failing
because
of
the
infrastructure
problem
and
integration
tests.
There
is
one
fail
that
is
currently
fixed.
That
is
currently
being
fixed.
I
mean
the
issue
is
in
progress,
so
we
could
expect
green
tests
so
and
after
that
there
is
one
built
that
is
not
enabled
on
the
repository,
and
it
is
not
run
on
request
that
is
functional
tests.