►
Description
Core Unit Launch Pod Sessions ||| Session #7: Governance Communications Core Unit
For the 7th CULPS episode we’ll have David Utrobin (@davidutro) presenting the Governance Communications Core Unit, COM-001
Agenda: https://forum.makerdao.com/t/core-unit-launch-pod-sessions-session-7-governance-communications-core-unit/7492
Governance Forum:
https://forum.makerdao.com/
Disclaimer: These calls and the summaries are produced and hosted by MakerDAO community members. Content produced by the community are not the statements or views of the Maker Foundation.
A
B
A
B
I'll
grab
it,
but
our
our
core
unit
is
really
about
bringing
support
to
maker
dao
on
on
the
communication
side
and
I'll
get
into
what
that
means.
But
let
me
just
briefly
introduce
myself:
my
name
is
david
utrobin,
and
actually
I
have
a
slide
for
myself.
So
let
me
let
me
actually
just
share
my
screen,
because
I
did
prepare
a
little
bit
of
a
deck
that
I
could
talk
through
and
so
yeah.
Let's
do
that.
B
Also,
I
am,
I
am
more
nervous
for
this
call
than
any
other
call.
I've
ever
been
on
so
whoo
all
right,
yeah,
just
gotta
slap,
my
cheek
a
little
bit
all
right,
hey
everybody!
Happy
monday
morning.
I
hope
you
all
had
a
fine
weekend
today,
we're
I'm
gonna,
be
talking
about
governance,
communications
and,
and
the
title
didn't
always
come
across
as
very
straightforward
to
the
community,
and
I
think
that's
because
not
a
lot
of
people
really
dive
into
what
it
means.
B
For
you
know,
organizations
to
communicate
generally
and
and
in
academia
they
usually
take
this
field
and
they
call
it
corporate
communications
or
organizational
communications,
and
that
really
is
kind
of
what
governance
communications
is
trying
to
do.
But
before
I
get
more
deeply
into
the
actual
into
the
actual
meet
of
the
subject,
let
me
just
quickly
introduce
myself
sorry
before
I
introduce
myself.
B
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
everybody
here
knows
what
they're
in
for
so
by
the
end
of
this
presentation,
I
hope
you
all
understand
what
the
vision
for
governance
communications
is.
What
the
value
for
this
kind
of
dedicated
team
is
where
we
are
in
the
actual
process
of
forming
our
core
unit
and
then
lastly,
kind
of
what
we
need,
which
is
really
just
feedback
from
all
of
you
and
so
yeah.
Who
am
I
so?
I
am
david
utrobin
david
eutro
also
known.
B
B
I've
worked
on
several
different
things.
Many
of
you
might
not
have
known.
I've
worked
on
various
documentation
projects,
including
the
original
faqs
for
single
collateral
dye
and
multi-collateral
diet.
I
ran
a
meet-up
grants
program
that
were
actually
in
the
process
of
sun
setting.
Right
now
I
created
and
ran
a
summary
team
for
doing
meeting
minutes
on
public
calls.
I've
run
the
community
call
for
about
two
years
and,
lastly,
I've
done
a
ton
of
work,
consulting
cdips
and
other
working
groups
that
resulted
out
of
community
development.
B
I
have
a
degree
in
corporate
communications
from
baruch
college
here,
actually
in
new
york,
and
just
some
of
my
previous
work
experience,
I
did
executive
assistant,
work
and
administration
work
at
baruch
college
as
well
as
operations
management
for
an
e-commerce
startup
for
a
couple
of
years,
following
my
degree,
and
so
who
are
we
actually
so
governance?
Communications?
B
Isn't
all
just
my
idea.
It's
actually
currently
artem
gordon,
who
is
our
quality
assurance
person
for
the
call
summaries,
as
well
as
tim
black,
who
works
on
maker
relay
and
the
community
development
portal,
as
well
as
a
number
of
part-time
contributors
from
other
core
units.
Some
key
people
who
definitely
helped
us
with
our
vision.
Are
you
know
jerry
seth
from
the
content,
production,
core
units
and
and
generally
speaking,
a
lot
of
people
from
the
community?
B
So
let
me
talk
a
little
bit
about
yeah.
Let
me
talk
a
little
bit
about
our
start,
so
govcom
started
as
a
working
group.
Our
task
was
to
explore
what
organizational
communications
looks
like
at
maker,
dow
and
and
our
projects
which
emerged
out
of
natural
informational
needs
at
the
dao
included
maker
relay
snippets
public
call
summaries
and
also
facilitating
the
reddit
moderation.
B
B
B
Inaccuracies
cost
a
lot
sometimes
and
then
coordination
is
needed,
no
matter
how
decentralized
we
we
get,
and
so,
and
so
those
are
kind
of
just
some
lessons
that
we
learned
out
of
the
the
working
group
so
far
and
more
generally
speaking,
to
give
a
an
overview
of
what
would
actually
sorry
for
flipping
through
the
slides
but
to
give
an
overview
of
what
communications
actually
is.
An
organization
we've
broken
it
down
into
kind
of
three
buckets,
so
there's
primarily
marketing,
which
promotes
products
and
services
builds
and
retains
customers.
B
There's
public
relations,
which
is
the
strategy
around
public
perception.
Often
that
department
deals
with
media
relations
and
then,
lastly,
which
is
the
field
that
we're
primarily
concerned
with,
is
organizational
communications,
and
these
are
you
know
day-to-day
needs
key
for
functioning
well,
and
so
what
do
organizational
communications
look
like?
B
Well,
they
I
bucketed
them
out
into
four
different
categories,
so
there's
informational
resources,
which
are
different
things
that
various
stakeholders
rely
on
they're,
the
public
calendar
they're
the
meeting
minutes
they're
the
core
unit
updates
they're,
the
monthly
or
quarterly
reports
they're
various
information
dashboards.
All
of
these
are
are
very
good
for
stakeholders.
B
There's
various
tools
as
well
alerts
and
notification
systems.
Mips
processes
that
stakeholders
can
use
to
you
know
effect
change
platforms
that
we
all
mutually
use
like
rocket,
chat,
the
forum
and
then
there's
the
component
of
relationships.
There's
working
relationships
throughout
the
dao,
as
well
as
with
the
stakeholders
beyond
the
dao,
there's,
also
importance
behind
actually
tracking
those
relationships
through
tools
like
voter
registry
and
other
stakeholder
registries,
and
then
it's
our
practices
right.
It's
our
crisis,
communications.
B
You
can
consider
internal
stakeholders.
These
are
stakeholders
that
are
kind
of
key
and
closest
to
the
information
and
then
there's
external
stakeholders.
These
are
also
dependents.
People
who
are
affected
by
changes
at
maker
dao,
but
are
a
little
bit
further
away
from
those
informational
sources
that
internal
stakeholders
are.
You
know
have
access
to
and
the
way
I
sliced
it
up
is
there's
maker
dao,
which
is
ultimately
governed
by
the
voters.
B
It's
that
internal
communication
side
of
it,
but
for
maker
dow,
because
we
are
very
much
a
public
organization
by
nature.
Our
organizational
communications
are
way
further
reaching
and
we
are
responsible
very
similar
to
like
a
public.
You
know
sec,
regulated
company
to
do
outreach
and
and
make
sure
our
communications
are,
are
top-notch
and
we're
able
to
actually
reach
all
the
stakeholders
that
we
need
to
and
have
a
connection
to
this
greater
stakeholder
map
that
exists
and
so
yeah.
B
B
Cool
and
also
just
really
quickly
about
the
the
value
of
organizational
communications,
because
I
realized
I
left
this
actually
off
the
slide,
but
good
organizational
communications.
They
make
an
organization
more
efficient.
You
know
people
don't
have
to
hunt
for
the
information
they
need.
They
don't
have
to
they
kind
of
know
where
to
access
everything.
That's
the
mark
of
a
really
really
great
infrastructure.
B
B
It
makes
an
organization
more
prepared
and
ultimately,
it
makes
the
organization
more
attractive,
not
just
for
for
more
voters
to
come
in,
but
for
more
stakeholders.
Generally
more
partners,
more
people
willing
to
use
bolts,
more
people
willing
to
use
die
in
general.
If
we
can
get
this
core
competency
right,
it
really
flourishes
and
has
lasting
effects,
and
just
ask
yourself,
as
an
investor
you
know,
would
you
want
to
put
your
money
in
a
organization
that
has
really
really
great
communications
practices
and
standards,
and
or
do
you
want
to
put
money
into
one
that
doesn't?
B
B
B
They
formed
into
a
foundation
to
further
bootstrap
the
protocol
and
over
the
course
of
the
last
basically
two
or
three
years,
we've
seen
a
an
organic
community
develop
around
the
actual
protocol,
while
the
foundation
and
the
builders
and
the
people
that
have
been
bootstrapping,
it
are
slowly
winding
down.
You
know
the
foundation
side
and
transitioning
to
actually
doing
decentralized
work
and
getting
funding
directly
from
the
protocol.
B
So
a
lot
of
teams
from
the
foundation,
for
example,
are
slowly
moving
selectively,
moving
into
being
actually
core
units
that
are
independently
funded
independently
audited
by
maker,
dow
and
and
independently
voted
on
right.
So
yeah
we're
in
this
state
of
transition
and
our
current
organizational
communications
are
decent
and
they're
growing
in
a
grassroots
way.
In
line
with
the
needs
of
the
dao.
B
However,
there's
a
huge
potential
to
raise
the
bar
and
currently
a
lot
of
the
work
that
happens
to
support
organizational
communications
are
actually
com,
dev,
compensated
projects
and
a
lot
of
these
projects
are
lacking
of
a
dow
funded
dedicated
team
that
they
can
all
kind
of
umbrella.
Under
the
scope
of.
B
And
so
yeah,
that's
kind
of
the
state
of
things.
Also,
a
few
things
worth
noting
you
know,
maker
voters
are
the
executive
decision
makers
here,
you
know
they're,
typically
in
a
in
a
traditional
company,
there's
a
board
of
directors
and
a
c-suite
of
executives,
and
there
is
a
whole
line
of
accountability
and
and
information
requirements
and
like
kind
of
active
management
almost
whereas
at
maker
dow,
that's
a
little
bit
different
right.
B
We
have
a
group
of
executive-level
pseudo-anonymous
voters,
a
headless
organization
right,
core
units
have
facilitators,
but
the
maker
protocol
as
a
whole
doesn't
have
a
ceo
or
a
coo
or
a
cto,
and,
generally
speaking,
we
are
a
public
organization
with
many
many
many
stakeholders
and
dependents.
So
these
are
kind
of
just
the
state
of
things
to
consider,
and
so
a
lot
of
confusion
has
been.
I've
noticed
a
lot
of
confusion
in
the
forums
around
the
different
communication
teams
that
are
being
proposed.
B
One
of
the
main
pieces
of
feedback
was
around
overlap,
and
I
I
kind
of
wanted
to
just
you
know,
put
this
slide
out
there
to
give
you
all
an
understanding
of
what
teams
are
out
there
or
are
being
proposed
right
now
and
what
their
functions
are.
So
before
I
talked
a
little
bit
about
how
you
can
divide
an
organization's
communication
into
marketing
pr
and
organizational
comms,
and
in
a
in
a
in
some
way.
We
are
almost
doing
that.
So
we
have
content
production,
which
is
a
generalized
content
team.
B
Advisory
and
so
now
let
me
get
into
kind
of
the
concrete
of
what
it
is
that
govcoms
does.
So
I
divided
it
into
these
three
simple
mandate:
sentences
we
facilitate
and
improve
on
the
basics.
So
what
are
the
basics?
You
might
ask
their
emergency
communications.
You
know
maker
relay
the
public
calendar.
B
Various
public
calls
meeting
minutes
additional
reports
that
our
dow
could
produce
the
organizational
chart
and
then
various
stakeholder
registries.
These
are
what
we
judge
to
be
foundational
kind
of
important
elements
of
of
organizational
communications
at
maker,
and
so
that's
one
piece.
The
next
piece
is
assessing
and
advising
maker
dow,
so
we
hope
to
actually
evaluate
our
organizational
comms.
B
On
the
whole,
we
want
to
advise
core
units,
delegates
and
others
on
best
practices
and
standards
around
information
sharing,
and
we
also
want
to
work
with
stakeholders
on
identifying
those
gaps
which,
in
other
words,
is
we
also
engage
and
maintain
relationships
with
stakeholders.
So
not
only
do
we
have
a
voter
registry,
but
we,
you
know,
for
you
know,
taking
mkr
voters,
for
example.
B
We
intend
to
do
the
same
with
inter
dow
actors,
delegates
at
maker,
dao
and
also
just
generally
speaking,
off-chain
governance,
participants
and
some
of
our
general
objectives
are.
We
want
to
create
a
better
reading
experience
for
voters
and
stakeholders.
We
want
to
give
issues
and
stakeholders
a
platform,
so
we
want
to
help
voices
and
views
get
heard.
B
We
want
to
bring
out
groups
inward,
we
have
external
stakeholders
and
we
want
to
make
them
more.
Welcome
and
privy
to
our
communications
infrastructure.
We
want
to
connect
them
all.
We
want
to
connect
everybody,
we
want
to
make
sure
that
there
are
no
gaps
and,
lastly,
we
want
to
focus
on
efficiency,
so
standard
setting,
consistency,
access
and
removal
of
this
unnecessary
comms
and,
generally
speaking,
where
we
are
in
this
entire
process.
B
Sorry,
let
me
exit
here.
That's
that's
pretty
much
it
for
the
for
the
deck
that
I
have,
but
where
we
are
in
this
entire
process
is,
we
are
currently
in
the
process
of
revising
our
mandate
packaging.
All
of
this
into
a
few
really
really
easy
to
understand
buckets,
and
the
main
thing
to
understand
is
that
maker,
dow
is
a
rapidly
growing
protocol
and
the
sands
are
somewhat
shifting
under
our
feet.
C
C
There
I
have
a
question
with
regards
to
public
communications:
does
your
team,
do
you
guys
envision
working
with
the?
I
don't
know
what
to
call
the
legal
core
unit
or
general
counsel
core
unit
when
it
comes
to
putting
out
you
know
public
disclosures,
or
is
that
something
that
the
communications
team
is
going
to
take
on
their
own
and
that's
fit.
B
Yeah,
so,
generally
speaking,
I
I
still
have
yet
to
understand
what
the
current
legal
core
unit
that's
being
formed
is
actually
going
to
cover.
If
they're
able
to
give
us
counsel
on
you
know
what
disclaimers
we
need,
what
information
we
probably
shouldn't,
put
out
there,
etc,
etc.
That
would
be
really
great.
That
would
be
a
service
we
would
happily
subscribe
to
and
work
with
them
on.
B
C
Yeah,
that
makes
sense,
and
when
it
comes
to
this
is
just
hypothetical
when
it
comes
to
say:
if
regulation
comes
into
fruition
one
day
and
say
your
team
has
to
file
something
similar
to
what
public
companies
do,
which
is
a
10k,
if
you
guys
had
to
file
something
crazy
like
that
in
the
future.
Is
that
something
you
guys
would
handle,
or
is
that
something
like?
I
guess
the
legal
team
has
to
handle?
They
have
to
hire
like
some
kind
of
like
assistant
counsel
or
something
do
you
have.
B
Any
thoughts
on
that
yeah
sure
so,
no
matter
what,
if
we
are
approached
with
a
request
to
you,
know,
fill
out
some
official
documentation
from
a
government
government
agency.
We
will
definitely
run
that
by
whatever
legal
team
is
available
or
present,
and
we
will
not
do
it
kind
of
secretly
we're
going
to
explain
to
the
community
what's
being
requested
of
us
what
it
entails.
B
A
C
B
B
Rather
if
the
market
sell-off
triggered
something
like
a
black
thursday
event,
where
liquidations
wasn't
working
properly,
that
is
somewhere
where
we
would
step
in
and
help.
And
what
that
looks
like
for
our
team
is:
is
this
so
gov
alpha
and
the
various
you
know
technical
core
units?
They
all
have
to
coordinate
around
solutions
decisions,
what's
happening,
etc,
etc.
What
our
core
unit
would
do
is
we
would
support
them
on
the
communication
side.
B
That
happens,
like
you,
know,
rocket
chat,
channel
for
coordinations
across
core
units
and
a
handful
of
other
things,
but
the
main
thing
we
would
be
doing
is
we
would
be
managing
that
discussion
thread.
We
would
be
managing
that
updates
thread,
so
we
would
be
aiding
not
just
in
the
coordination,
but
also
we
would
gather
what
information
is
there
in
the
discussion
thread
to
identify
gaps,
identify
other
impact
that
the
team
hasn't
spotted
and,
generally
speaking,
we're
we're
support.
So
we
don't
own
the
whole
thing
we're
just
helping
in
the
coordination
of
it.
C
Got
it
so
I
guess
your
team
wouldn't
get
on
twitter
and
say
hey.
This
is
just
a
small
example
of
what
happened
this
saturday
night
here
illegally.
I
think
the
osm
was
delayed.
It
wasn't
changing
and
nick
had
to
tweak
it
a
bit
and
get
it
going
right
because
the
price
wasn't
updating
yeah.
So
I
guess
that's
something
you
guys
wouldn't
get
on
twitter
right
in
the
middle
of
the
night
and
say:
hey
we're
tweaking
the
osm.
C
B
B
He
has
access
contact
to
all
the
possible
stakeholders,
so
he
would
be
able
to
launch
that
first
line
of
you
know
proactive
communications,
but
then,
generally
speaking,
if
the
problem
is
longer
lasting
lasts
longer
than
a
couple
days,
if
there
needs
to
be
some
more
broad
stakeholder,
aware
awareness,
we
would
help
in
various
ways.
Not
only
would
we
report
it
on
make
a
relay,
but
we
would
also
work
with
other
core
units
to
actually
get
that
word
out
there.
B
Also
at
the
moment,
we
don't
have
a
lot
of
the
infrastructure
that
we're
proposing.
For
example,
we
don't
have
you
know
cross-core
unit
registries,
of
like
all
the
integrators
right,
I'm
sure
the
integrations
core
unit
has
a
list
of
all
the
integrators,
but
to
share
that
kind
of
list
with
our
core
unit.
Yes,
we
would
definitely
take
advantage
and
try
to
build
up
a
way
to
not
just
notify
stakeholders
but
but
also
engage
with
them
over
the
long
term.
But
I
hope
that
answered
the
question.
C
A
Maybe,
to
follow
a
little
bit
on
what
frank
is
doing.
Obviously,
this
core
unit
is
supporting
other
core
units,
and
that's
that's
great.
Is
there
anything
that
you
would
say
this
we
own
and
it's
only
our
core
unit
that
will
do
it
kind
of
like
in
vacuum
or
or
pretty
much.
Everything
is
a
bit
cross,
functional.
B
I
would
say
that
so
yeah,
it's
it's
been
one
of
the
challenges
that
I've
had.
You
know
over
the
last
like
basically
month
or
two
and
trying
to
form
the
mandate
for
this
core
unit
is
understanding
what
the
overlap
is,
and
so
you
know,
for
example,
like
one
thing
that
we
might
fully
own
to
answer.
Your
question
directly
is
maker
relay
right.
B
We
control
maker
relay
and
our
our
job
as
a
core
unit
is
to
aggregate
all
the
updates.
You
know,
align
them
in
there
for
in
a
format
make
it.
You
know,
as
reader
friendly
as
possible,
make
sure
the
the
information
that's
there
is
complete,
verified,
et
cetera,
et
cetera.
So,
like
that's
one
thing,
but
that's
not,
you
know,
we
hope
to
also
advise
on
what
core
units
are
putting
out
in
terms
of
reports.
So,
let's
say
real
world
finance,
or
eventually
some
accounting
core
unit
puts
out
the
maker
financials.
B
We
want
to
work
with
that
core
unit,
not
just
on
like
actually
getting
exposure
for
that
report.
You
know
whether
it's
publishing
it
as
a
part
of
the
maker
relay
or
publishing
it
on
the
community
blog
or
about
whatever
it
might
be,
will
be
there
to
advise
at
a
minimum,
but
definitely
host
and
proactively
produce
as
a
maximum,
but
it
really
depends
on
what
the
report
is.
What
you
know
what
the
output
is,
so
maybe
some
things
like
make
a
relay
we
own,
but
other
things
we
advise
on
other
things.
D
Thank
you
for
your
presentation,
david.
Oh,
did
you
want
to
follow
up,
one
no
go
ahead.
Go
ahead.
One
question
I
had
is
it's
coming
from
from
my
feedback
that
I
left
on
your
post
a
while
back,
I'm
glad
to
see
that
you've
added
the
voter
engagement
part
into
your
mandate,
and
so
I
would
love
to
hear
more
about
it,
whether
you're
planning
any
specific
actions
on
this
subject
or
if
it's
still
in
the
planning
phase.
Thank
you.
B
B
Obviously,
other
core
units
are
going
to
do
their
own
stakeholder
engagement
projects,
so
I'm
totally
not
surprised
and
not
off
put
that
gov
alpha
is
doing
this
kind
of
this
kind
of
work
so
yeah.
I
hope
the
kind
of
answer
is
it,
but
we
would
be
doing
engagement.
Here's
one
example.
We
would
be
doing
engagement
around
whether
the
information,
the
reports
that
we
put
out
are
enough.
What
information
is
missing?
What
do
you
expect
to
see
like
what
kind
you
know?
D
B
At
the
moment,
we're
sticking
to
the
existing
ones
as
for
new
voters
and
new
projects
we
want
to,
we
want
to
think
about
ways
that
we
could,
or
we
want
to
think
about
potential
projects.
We
can
support
that
might
be
technical
solutions
for
voters
to
be
able
to
communicate
better.
I
know
one
huge
request
for
the
last
few
years,
for
example,
has
been
a
you
know,
sign
only
you
know
you
have
to
be
an
mkr
holder
to
be
able
to
chat
in
some
specific
room.
You
know
basically
having
verified
mkr
communications
like
that.
A
B
Yeah
I
my
goal
is
definitely
to
have
as
much
information
up
front
before
people
vote
on
us
as
possible.
It's
actually
one
of
the
reasons
I've
been
considering
even
extending
our
rfc
an
additional
month
just
so
that
I
could
have
a
bit
more
band,
I'm
going
to
have
more
bandwidth
this
coming
month,
and
so
I
could
have
a
lot
more
coming
into
it
to
help.
You
know,
voters
understand
what
it
is
they're
voting
on
and
what
our
roadmap
is
and
part
of
the
mandate
revision
does
include
a
three
to
six
month
roadmap.
B
I
don't
really
like.
I
have
an
infographic,
but
it's
a
little
bit
messy
so
yeah.
I'm
not
super
ready
to
share
that,
but
in
general
it
could
look
like
it's
gonna.
Look
like
this.
It's
gonna
look
like
all
the
things
that
we're
currently
doing
make
a
relay.
We
would
do
the
public
calls.
We
would
facilitate
reddit
moderation
as
we
do.
We
would
expand
meeting
minutes
to
all
public
calls.
We'd
continue
doing
the
calendar.
B
We
want
to
help
with
press
relations,
for
example
at
least
facilitate
a
venue
for
it
which
we're
in
the
process
of
doing
we
want
to
do
an
advisory
role.
We
want
to
rate
core
unit
communications,
potentially,
so
there's
like
a
lot
of
potential
things
that
we
could
do
so
it's
it's
hard
to
say
that
we're
definitely
gonna
do
them
in
the
roadmap.
A
B
A
B
Yeah
I'll
definitely
be
there
for
that.
But,
generally
speaking
where
we
are
in
the
process,
is
we
have
a
vision?
We've
identified
like
a
very
clear
need
for
the
dao.
What
I'm
looking
for
is
a
bit
more
talent,
so
I
am
looking
for
at
least
another
full-time
person
who
can
partner
with
me
on
this.
I
am
a
young
communications
professional,
but
you
know
maker
dao
is
a
multi-billion
dollar
cvl
organization,
it's
public!
B
I
would
really
really
love
if
anybody
could
put
me
together
with
you
know,
a
more
seasoned
experienced
communications
professional,
I
think
maker
dao
could
really
benefit
from
that.
This
team
could
really
benefit
from
that
and,
in
general,
I'm
very
open
to
doing
this
right.
So
if
anybody
here
has
connections
and
wants
to
you
know,
put
me
in
touch
has
any
ideas
on
how
we
can
even
improve
this
mandate
structure.
Better,
please
reach
out
to
me
I'm
very
open
to
that.
C
B
I
have
a
vision
for
what
the
team
should
consist
of
and
since
I've
been
drafting
kind
of
the
structure
of
it
as
a
facilitator
yeah
I
mean
it's
kind
of
the
standard
stuff
right.
You
set
a
vision.
You
set
your
goals,
you
set,
you
know
people
to
own
the
different
components
of
what
you
know
what
your
team
is
responsible
for
and
really
you
manage
it
right.
You
do
your
one-on-ones,
you
do
your
stand-ups,
you
do
your
okrs,
you
make
sure
tracking
is
in
place
for
everything.
B
B
C
Yeah
thanks,
I
know
it's
hard
at
the
beginning.
I
was
just
thinking
in
particular.
Like
the
other
day,
you
set
up
the
like
media
communications
channel
framework,
and
you
know
that
just
kind
of
came
out
of
hey.
We
got
someone
who
wants
to
talk
about
something
we
need
a
framework
and
then
you
kind
of
got
to
spring
into
action.
B
Yeah
yeah,
so
I
mean
yeah,
that's
another
part
about
being
a
facilitator.
It's
you
know
it's
to
what
you're
saying
it's
being
proactive
and
and
really
jumping
on
opportunities
when
they
arise
so
yeah
like
we've,
been
talking
about
how
to
do
media
relations
as
a
dao
for
a
while,
and
I
think
I
think
in
traditional
companies
like
pr-
will
have
some
point
person
to
do
press
relations,
but
at
maker
dow
it's
a
little
bit
different
like
we
can
set
up
a
point
person
for
sure.
B
But,
alternatively,
we're
trying
this
thing,
and
I'm
saying
this
for
the
people
in
the
call
that
might
not
know
we're
trying
this
thing
where
we're
doing
a
permissioned
category.
In
the
forum
where
members
of
the
media
can
reach
out
to
me,
they
can
get
put
on
the
media
list
and
they'll
have
access
to
posting
questions
and
there's
you
know
some
guidelines
there
and
the
people
who
can
respond
are
only
trust
level.
B
Three
forum
participants,
so
these
are
senior
community
members,
core
unit,
facilitators,
other
mandated
actors
and
so
we're
trying
this
model,
and
it's
not
really
something
that
I
could
find
that
anybody
else
is
doing.
But
at
a
minimum,
yeah
being
a
facilitator,
is
definitely
jumping
on
lowest
hanging
fruit
and
opportunity
when,
when
you
can
so
yeah
when
me
and
long
set
it
up,
it
was
like
bound
to
happen.
We
both
knew
what
the
idea
was
and
yeah.
We
just
did
it.
E
I
find
that
very
useful,
and
I
I
would
like
I
don't
know
if
it's
possible,
but
it
will
be
amazing
if
you
could
include
information
from
other
dolls
like
if
other
dolls
are
talking
about
a
die
about
maker.
If
we
have
to
be
aware
of
something
that
will
be
super
super
awesome,
I
don't
know
if
you
have
considered
that,
and
the
other
thing
is
that
last
week
we
had
this
little
issue
with
with
coinbase
custody,
so
the
investors
of
the
the
maker
holders
that
have
that
had
mkr
in
coinbase
custody.
E
They
couldn't
vote.
So
it
will
be
great
also
if
your
core
unit
could
like
manage
these.
These
third
parties,
who
are
involved
in
the
process
of
voting
because
well,
I
guess,
like
communicating,
is,
is
related
to
like
different
things,
not
just
like
telling
the
telling
everyone
what's
happening,
but
also
like
anticipating
to
these
kind
of
events.
E
B
One
thing
that
I
I
now
realize
is
missing
from
my
version
is
that
you
know
outside
or
even
semi-outside
circle
the
public
and
the
users
you
know
somewhere.
There
is
also
neighboring
protocols
and
you're
right.
You
know
they.
They
definitely
do
carry
news
for
maker
that
might
affect
you,
know
various
internal
stakeholder
decisions
right
and
so
yeah.
Our
intention
is
to
have
those
relationships
it.
It
starts
with
a
registry
at
least
right.
B
It
starts
with
just
a
list
of
who's
who
and
then
it
goes
into
more
like
how
do
we
keep
each
other
notified,
not
just
them
us,
but
also
the
other
way
around.
So
I
don't
know
like
it's
hard
to
talk
specifics
when
you're
being
general,
but
generally
speaking.
Yes,
that
is
definitely
something
that's
on
our
mandate,
likewise,
like
with
maker
relay
and
being
more
descriptive
about
various
things
we
do
intend.
B
Not
just
to
you
know,
do
everything
ourselves
out
of
maker
relay,
for
example,
you
know
we
will
be
working
with
other
core
units,
for
example
content
production.
So
if
there's
somebody
from
content
production
that
really
specializes
in
you
know
the
dye
peg
analysis,
we
would
totally
add
that
kind
of
stuff
to
the
maker
relay
and
and
more
but
but
yeah
go.
You
know
digressing
going
back
to
your
point.
E
B
Agreed
it's
it's
also
a
group
effort
right
and
it's
also,
ultimately,
a
decision
of
coinbase
custody
like
as
much
as
we
wish
that
vcs
would
just
self-custody
and
vote
with
everything.
You
know
they
have
risk
parameters
right
and
that's
why
people
use
stuff
like
coinbase
custody,
but
even
from
coinbase
custody's
perspective.
You
know
our
governance
contract
is
soon
getting
a
revision.
B
B
I
would
say
so
there's
different
ways
of
actually
getting
that
message
across
the
coin
base
and
others
others
like
them,
and,
generally
speaking,
we
should
be
advocating
that
not
just
we
advocate,
but
also
that
mkr
voters
themselves
that
are
in
those
custody
custody
solutions
advocate,
because
I
think
those
are
the
best
positions
people
to
really
make
that
argument
to
coinbase,
like
hey
you're,
holding
5000
of
my
mkr,
I
want
to
vote
and
I
need
it
to
be
still
be
in
custody.
Can
you
facilitate
this
for
me?
B
C
B
Yeah
totally
so
I've
I've
envisioned
kind
of
two
pieces
to
this,
so
one
of
them
is
like.
We
definitely
want
a
page
somewhere,
whether
it's
on
the
community
development
portal
or
even
just
a
dedicated
place
in
the
forums.
But
we
want
like
profiles
of
our
delegates,
so
we
want
to
know
who
they
are,
what
their
views
on
where
they
lean.
You
know
history
of
what
they've
done,
so
we
hope
to
work
with
delegates
to
produce
those
kinds
of
informational
resources
about
themselves.
B
C
B
So
like
and
generally
speaking,
I
think
maybe
this
wasn't
super
clear
in
our
mandate.
Yet
you
know
not
just
yet,
because
I
haven't
written
it
in,
but
one
of
our
really
big
values
is
objectivity.
You
know,
because
we
are
in
the
middle
of
these
communications,
we
don't
like.
We
don't
want
to
steer
any
decision.
B
Manipulatively
right.
We
don't
want
to
try
to
make
people
lean
one
way
or
another.
We
want
to
present
the
facts.
First
and
foremost,
we
want
to
verify
that
the
facts
are
the
facts
and
we
want
to
share
a
balanced
view
of
whatever
it
is
that
we're
putting
out
there.
So
if
there's
an
issue,
we
want
to
make
sure
both
sides
get
heard.
You
know
not
just
one
side
for
the
benefit
of
m
care
holders
right
but
yeah.
C
C
C
B
C
B
One
thing
that
I'm
really
cognizant
of
is
not
doing
a
half-assed
job.
We
want
the
right
people,
we
could
afford
the
right
people
and
artem
is
really
a
great
candidate,
because
he's
been
working
on
the
governance
call
summary
team
for
the
better
part
of
a
year.
Now
he
is
intimately
aware
of
like
how
maker
dow
itself
works.
You
know
what
the
organization
of
maker
dial
looks
like
what
the
road
map
is,
etc,
etc.
B
So,
just
from
an
informational
standpoint,
artem
makes
a
really
great
candidate
as
well
as
his
previous
work
experience
he's
one
of
the
most
competent
people.
I've
had
the
pleasure
of
working
with
in
the
past.
Again,
both
of
us
are
young.
Both
of
us
are
getting
our
feet
wet,
but
I
think
he
would
make
a
great
project
manager
and,
generally
speaking,
when
we
do
fully
flesh
out
what
this
core
unit
does
we're.
B
C
D
B
Yeah
absolutely
so,
I
think
one
good
set
of
examples
is
probably
the
the
community
call,
so
the
community
call
has
evolved
over
the
years,
so
it
started
off
with
as
kind
of
a
weekly
update
to
mkr
holders
and
anybody
who'd
watch
and
it
quickly
became
apparent.
That's
not
really
a
great
use
of
the
call's
time.
Nobody
told
me
this.
I
observed
this
both
from
the
views,
both
people's
individual
kind
of
feedback.
B
B
Another
is
the
call
summary
team.
So
back
when
I
was
working
with
richard
brown,
you
know
I
had
a
bit
of
bandwidth
and
we
were
just
starting
the
governance
call
back.
Then
it
was
like
steven
rich
myself
and
a
few
others
in
those
calls-
and
you
know
one
thing
that
I
immediately
started
doing
was
the
meeting
minutes,
because
nobody
was
doing
this.
I
I
recognized
it
as
a
need
not
just
for
the
information
like
at
the
moment,
but
also
for
historic
preservation.
B
So
that's
another
example.
I
think,
maybe
that
you
could
also
ask
people
that
I've
generally
worked
with
how
you
know
proactivity
is
very
much
a
part
of
my
my
nature
and
I'm
always
trying
to
figure
out
the
best
unspoken
solutions
to
various
problems
that
we
deal
with
in
all
of
our
projects.
Yeah.
Those
are
a
couple
of.
A
C
B
Yeah
yeah,
that's
a
great
question
and
definitely
one
that
I've
been
thinking
a
lot
about
over
the
last
month
or
two.
So
there
were
different
there's
a
handful
of
different
options
for
core
units
and
I
think
that
we
won't
be
independently
incorporating,
as
as
far
as
like
the
plan
is
right.
Now
we're
actually
going
to
be
approaching
accountable
and
we're
going
to
try
to
set
up
entirely
through
them.
That's
because
it
makes
it
really
easy
to
pay
contributors
both
in
crypto
and
in
fiat.
C
A
A
B
Our
original
intention
was
to
have
our
core
unit
go
through
the
vote
in
the
may
governance
cycle,
but
you
know,
given
the
just
the
need
for
a
like
a
better
structured
or
clear.
I
don't
know
I.
I
just
need
to
be
satisfied
that
it's
ready
before
I
really
like.
Let
it
go
to
a
vote,
that's
the
main
struggle
that
I'm
really
having
but
yeah.
B
B
B
Yeah
sure
so
you
could
provide
feedback
both
in
dms
and
on
the
forum.
Welcome.
My
username
everywhere
is
david
utrow,
the
first
four
letters
of
my
last
name,
david
utro,
that's
on
twitter
forum
rocketchat
wherever,
and
so.
If
you
would
like
to
see
the
revision,
it's
currently
not
up,
yet
we
have
our.
B
E
B
Yeah,
just
a
huge
thank
you
to
the
people
that
have
helped
me
think
through
this
have
helped
me
shape.
It
have
given
me
lots
of
great
feedback,
whether
it
was
very
straightforward
or
or
whatever
it
was
great.
I
appreciate
it
and
maker
dao
appreciates
it,
and
I
think
that
we're
all
growing
towards
something
really
special
and
so
yeah,
I
hope
governance
communications
makes
sense,
is
a
valid
idea,
and
I
hope
that
we
can
execute
it
well.