►
From YouTube: Delegate Office Hours | Strategic Finance Core Unit
Description
The Delegate Office Hours call is hosted by the Governance Communications Core Unit in collaboration with Recognized Delegates of MakerDAO.
The call aims to bring together all delegates and discuss recent events, governance activity, and other domains relative to governance and delegation.
https://forum.makerdao.com/t/delegate-office-hours-9-includes-poll-for-discussion-topic/17538
A
All
right
welcome
everyone
at
thursday's
delegate
office
hour,
I'm
thomas
floyd
with
guppcoms.
Thank
you
for
joining
us
today.
We
have
a
couple
of
things
we
want
to
cover
before
we
get
into
the
meet
at
the
meeting
here.
First
off,
we
certainly
want
to
encourage
good
engagement.
So
if
you
will,
please
use
our
chat
feature
and
also
during
the
call,
if
you
can
use
a
raised
hand
feature
so
we
everybody
can
have
a
have
a
chance
to
to
speak
or
ask
questions.
So
today
we
have
a
couple
of
things.
A
First,
artem's
gonna
join
us
here
in
a
little
while
he's
got
some
follow-up
information.
He
wants
to
cover
with
everyone
just
for
a
minute,
and
I
wanted
to
go
over
first,
the
dog
office.
Our
poll,
we
didn't
have
too
much
participation,
but
that's
okay.
A
We
had
three
votes,
which
kind
of
helps
us
lead
into
what
folks
want
to
talk
about
lead
into
the
topic.
For
here
today
we
had
three
votes.
One
was
the
live
vote
discussion
spf
for
legal
domain
work
on
greenland
collateral
other
was
a
vote
for
mip
72
success,
capital,
ranger
application
and
then
vote
for
no
topic
open
mic,
so
also
I
wanted
to
see
is
refl
on.
He
is
not
on
yet.
I
don't
know
if
he
wanted
to
follow
up
on
his
project
he's
working
on
as
well.
A
B
A
Things
but
I
will
open
the
floor
to
see
where
we
want
to
get
started.
I
don't
know
peyton
did
you
want
to
add
anything.
C
A
So
do
we
want
to
do?
We
want
to
go
with
live
vote
for
spf
for
legal
domain
work
or
mips
72,
or
do
we
just
want
to
keep
it
open
today
and
see?
What's
on
everybody's
mind,
we
can
get
started
I'll,
open
the
floor.
E
As
of
now
looks
like
the
green
light
poll
passed
for
the
legal
domain
work.
Okay,
I
mean,
I
guess,
since
strategic
finances
here,
they
and
cameras
are
on
if
they
want
to
add
something
that
they
haven't
already
said
for
the
record
they
can,
but
not
particularly
sure,
if
that's
actually,
what
folks
want
to
talk
about.
Okay,.
F
Yeah,
I
I
missed
the
end
of
the
votes,
appreciate
it
we'll
use
it
judiciously,
and
hopefully
we
won't
have
to
make
another
request
after
we're
done,
but
we
did
our
best
to
communicate
that
there
may
have
to
be
a
second
request
for
further
funding.
A
All
right,
thank
you,
andrew
appreciate
that
yep
paper
says:
let's
move
along
says
done
so
again,
I'll
just
open
the
floor
and
there's
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
thoughts,
tim
or.
G
D
Okay,
yeah,
I'm
just
interested
like
basically
the
for
me
for
me.
D
So,
okay,
let
me
let
me
zoom
out,
so
basically
I
think
car
units
working
for
other
dollars
is
basically
a
good
thing,
especially
like
at
the
moment
with
lido,
because
maker
is
interfacing
with
lighter
more
if
there
are
game
plan
passes
right.
But
that
being
said,
I
think,
there's
part
of
the
ant
game
plan
is
pretty
extreme
pressure
to
reduce
costs,
and
at
that
point
I
think
what
I'm
asking
is,
since
you
are
kind
of
developing
the
same
tools
for
lighter
that
you
are
developing
for
maker.
D
If
these
two
dollars,
then
shouldn't
kind
of
share
your
bill
instead
of
increasing
it.
You
know
what
I
mean
like
that's
my
thinking,
because
if
you,
if
you
really
need
to
get
the
budget
down
to
half
of
what
it
is
now,
I
think
this
is
like
a
very
extreme
pressure
on
on
expenses,
and
then
we
really
have
to
like
leave
no
stone
unturned.
So
that
was
my
thinking.
H
Yeah,
so
I
think
roone
is
addressing
a
lot
of
the
budget
reductions
himself,
as
you
may
have
you
know,
seen
in
the
endgame
map.
H
You
know
if
we're
kind
of
taking
a
step
back
from
the
reductions
given
given
that,
if
I
think
scs
is
still
may
still
be,
you
know
working
on
their
project-based
budgeting
initiative,
but
you
know
we're
working
on
other.
You
know
more
important
initiatives,
while
roone
kind
of
handles.
You
know
what
he
wants
to
do.
H
You
know,
given
that
he
has.
You
know
a
super
significant
part
of
the
active
voting
tokens.
I
think
what
he
decides
will
you
know
likely
be
voted
in.
So
when
it
comes
to
budgets,
you
know
you
might
want
to
speak
with
them.
If
there's
specific
areas
that
you
want
to
cut,
I
think
you
know
it's
throughout
this
whole
process.
It's
been
extremely
unclear.
H
What
you
know.
Sf's
involvement
in
the
endgame
plan
is
if
it
will
be
involved
at
all.
Even
you
know,
there's
also
a
active
off-boarding
post,
which
I
don't
think
anyone
on
this
call
has
addressed.
So
you
know,
I
think
it's
important
to
understand
that
you
know
cory
and
it's
relationship
with
the
dow
is
a
two-way
street,
and
you
know
I
think,
we've
our
coordinates
been.
You
know
politically,
you
know
caught
in
the
crossfire
at
times
and
we're
happy
to
have
these
conversations
publicly.
H
H
I
had
no
knowledge
of
him.
You
know
wanting
to
empower
sf
with
these
tasks
and
have
that
become
part
of
our
mandate
or
his
desire
for
us
to
help
facilitate
some
of
the
world
finance
work
that
there's
kind
of
a
gap
in
the
dow
right
now
with
you
know
the
team
being
off-boarded,
so
you
know
understanding
that
things
are
extremely
fluid
right
now.
D
Yeah,
I
think
I
I
think
I
articulate
articulated
my
concerns,
so
I'm
not
sure
if
I'm
drawing
any
conspiracies
here
but
but
happy
to
be
corrected
here.
Basically,
for
me,
my
issue
is
like
how
the
dao
learned
about
this
in
the
first
place,
and
then
I
think
the
the
the
second
concern
was.
It
was
about
budgets
like
these
were
my
two
main
concerts
and
not
clear
if
I'm
really
insinuating
any
conspiracies
here.
If
so,
then.
H
Broadly,
given
the
what
I've
read
and
to
address
the
the
the
first
post,
we,
you
know,
we
are
not
being
paid
by
lydo
today.
There's
active
snapshot
proposal
that
ends
this
week,
and
that
was
you
know.
Our
plan
is,
if
that
proposal
passed,
we
would
then
disclose
it
to
the
community
and
there's
a
ton
of
people
with
you
know.
H
Other
working
for
other
dolls
can
compensate
from
other
dolls
protocols,
companies
that
aren't
disclosed
anywhere
people
using
different
identities,
but
you
know
point
is
well
taken
that
you
know,
given,
I
guess,
sf's
increased
role
in
the
endgame
plan
that
we,
you
know,
try
and
be
a
leader
in
transparency,
and
we,
you
know,
indeed
you
know
believe
we
should
have
shared
this
proposal
before
you
know
it's
fully
up
as
it
relates
to
budgets,
yeah
again
I'll.
H
A
Right,
thank
you
mark.
Thank
you.
Raphael
code.
Knight's
got
his
hand
raised
code.
Knight
will
be
coming
over
to
you
now
yeah
before.
B
Yeah,
I
just
wanted
to
ask:
how
was
it
determined
that
very
finance
would
play
such
a
large
role
in
the
in-game
plan?
I
haven't
seen
any
public
discussion.
I've
been
following
it
that
really
even
mentioned
strategic
finance,
so
I
just
want
to
know
like
from
your
end,
what
kind
of
conversations
went
into
that
being
included.
H
Yeah
I
mean
I'm
we're
surprised
as
you
are.
To
be
honest,
I
mean
I've
obviously
had
conversations
with
room
private,
but
it
never
was
discussed
that
you
know
we
would
get
authority
over
world
assets.
Obviously,
I've
been
talking
to
him
about
metadow's,
protector,
metadows
and
working
with
other
people
that
are
working
on
the
endgame
plan,
but
you
know
when
he
disclosed
that
and
the
proposal.
It
was
a
surprise
to
me.
H
B
H
Yeah
I
mean
so,
we
did
have
a
call
with
the
delegates
last
week
that
about
you
know
some
other
myths
that
are
being
worked
on
related
to
like
rwa
type
deals,
and
I
don't
want
to
like
speculate
or
put
words
in
ruin's
mouth,
but
that
may
have
been
a
factor
in.
A
H
Decision
also
that
you
know
sebastian
formally
led
that
rwf
core
unit
is
really
the
only
one
with
any.
You
know
knowledge
of
that
business
left
in
the
dow.
That's
actively
working.
You
know
from
and
also
you
know,
working
with
christian
as
well
on.
You
know
metadata
work,
so
maybe
those
were
you
know,
factors
that
roon
took
into
account,
but
yeah
again,
I
just
would
request
that
you
ask
him
directly,
since
we
weren't
involved
in
that
decision.
I
think
there
are
others
that
were
involved
in
that
decision,
but
we
were
not.
A
A
Adrian
says
it
says:
we're
starting
clear:
it's
the
whole
cu
papers,
a
lot
of
questions
we
have
also
and.
A
Also
robstead
cs:
oh
okay,
so
robert
cs
ces
gives
me
his
deep
operational
launch
with
world
war
assets
just
throwing
some
comments
out
there.
If
anybody
wants
to
speak
on
some
of
the
chat
comments
that
you
posted.
I
H
Right,
thank
you
robert.
I
guess
the
the
point
that
I'm
making
is
that
you
know
sebastian
led
the
world
fast
team
he's
been
heavily
involved
in
that
throughout
the
transition.
You
know,
I
understand
that
c
c
s
has
a
lot
of
expertise,
onboarding
for
the
asset
collaterals,
and
I
don't
really
see
anything
changing
too
significantly
in
the
grand
scheme
of
things
when
it
comes
to
onboarding
collateral
right
now,.
A
Peyton
raises
a
question
too.
Is
it
a
concern,
an
overlap
of
work
for
a
protocol
that
is
part
of
the
collateral
strategy
for
maker?
Do
you
have
any
plans
on
how
the
lsf
will
respond
to
when
asked
to
evaluate,
lighter
stinky
options,
or
likewise
letter
decides
to
propose
changes
for
the
fault?
So
I'm
just
going
to
throw
that
out
there
from
the
chat.
H
So
I
think
roon
is
really
dictating
the
collateral
strategy
as
it
relates
to
rdbase
through
the
endgame
mips
and
we'll
literally
just
be
following.
What's
you
know
if
those
mips
pass
we'll
be,
you
know
following
exactly
what
the
mips
state
you
know
we're
not
going
to
be
making
discretionary
decisions
and
we'll
try
and
be
transparent
as
possible.
For
you
know,
ifrit
wants
to
accumulate.
H
You
know
beef,
a
mix
of
steak,
teeth,
eat
or
just
stick
thief.
You
know,
I
think
his
thinking
is
evolving
in
that
regard,
but
you
know
I
haven't
really
spoken
with
him
about
it.
So
it's
I
don't
really
want
to
speculate
on
his
plans.
C
So,
like
a
practical
example,
I
guess,
like
you,
do
a
lot
of
modeling
for
for
our
revenue
and-
and
you
know
basically
cost
assumptions
so
like.
Will
you
consider
raising
staked
stability
fees?
For
instance,
like
you
know,
it's
just
basically,
there's
there's
likely
to
be
a
lot
of
situations
where
you're
asked
to
make
a
neutral
judgment,
and
you
have
this
obligation
so
just
wondering
if
you
had
a
structure
within
the
team
to
to
work
that
out
or
kind
of
like
a
party
line
that
you'll
be
towing.
H
C
So
like
when
you
do
your
your
monthly
roundups
right,
a
big
part
is
looking
at
how
much
we
earned
and
then
future
forecasting
like
okay,
here's
how
much
we
can
recently
expect
to
make
that
involves
predicting
a
large
chunk
of
of
lido,
how
much
we
bring
in
and
how
much
we
charge
for
it.
So
I
just
think
that
kind
of
sets
up
for
for
some
spots,
where
you
know
if,
if
there's
community
distrust.
D
C
Going
to
be
a
spot,
they
they
raise
the
alarms
on.
But
if
the
community
trusts
you
and
you
have
a
process
in
place,
it
can
be
very
clearly
described
as
locate
here's.
What
we're
doing
here's
why
this
won't
affect
us
is.
H
For
maker's
perspective
sounds
like
you're
talking
about
the
momc
which
I'm
not
involved
with.
So
as
it
relates
to
stability
fee
rates
yeah,
I
have
no
influence
over
what
the
you
know.
People
on
the
mmc
decide
for
each
collateral,
including
ste
30th,.
F
But
what
it's
worth
so,
I
think
to
to
to
point
directly.
I
think
the
idea
that
we
had
was
there
are
collaborators
who
are
purely
on
lido.
There
are
collaborators
who
are
purely
on
maker
and
stratified,
and
anyway,
I
think
one
of
the
virtues
of
this
space
is
that
all
of
the
data
is
essentially
open,
so
you
don't
actually
have
to
take
our
results
for
granted.
F
The
other
thing
is
that
when
it
comes
to
forward-looking
forecasts,
we
actually
don't
do
a
lot
of
this
at
all
like
when
we
do
do
it.
We
are
very
clear
about
the
punctuality
of
these
assumptions
and
they
tend
to
be
extremely
extremely
simplified.
Something
like
you
know,
last
month
times
12
or
something
stupid
like
this,
for
any
number
of
reasons,
the
first
of
which,
being
that
it's
near
impossible
to
try
and
make
predictions
in
this
space
at
the
moment.
F
So
you
want
to
actually
see
that
type
of
work
product
coming
from
our
core
unit
today
or
in
the
future.
When
we
do
projected
it's,
you
know
for
things
like
operational
decisions
of
like
okay,
this
is
the
cost.
This
is
the.
F
C
And
thanks,
I,
I
appreciate
that
yeah,
okay,.
F
C
I
just
think
like
having
something
structurally
in
place
and
then
telling
the
community
that
goes
a
long
way.
Like
that's
one
of
the
reasons
we
always
have
multiple
governance
facilitators,
because
there
could
be
a
situation
where
I
have
a
conflict
of
interest
or
someone
in
the
community
thinks
I
have
a
conflict
of
interest
and
whether
it's
true
or
not,
it
can
just
be
easy
for
me
to
say
all
right.
You
know
what
well
patrick's
gonna
be
the
sole
decider
on
this.
I'm
gonna
completely
remove
myself.
A
All
right,
thank
you,
adrian
dan.
Thank
you
peyton
for
those
questions.
A
Good
conversation
so
far,
any
any
other
comments
or
thoughts
on
this.
Just
keep
the
floor
open.
G
Hey
sorry,
what's
the
subject
for
today,
I'm
sorry.
A
We
had
we
had
started
talking
about
strategic
finance
and
they
they're
here
we're
just
kind
of
talking
about
that
right
now
that,
with
those
guys
ask
you
some
questions,
that's
where
we're
at.
G
Okay,
has
anybody
brought
up
the
the
possibility
of
strategic
finance
working
on
automation
for
the
future?
In
case
you
know
they
they
get
rich
and
they
retired
I'm
being
sarcastic.
But
no,
you
know
the
goal
of
maker
now,
in
my
opinion,
should
involve
full
automation.
So
I
wondering
if
you
guys,
have
thought
about
you
know
if
the
metadow,
sorry,
the
end
game
gets
implemented.
G
If
that's
one
of
the
things
you're
thinking
about,
and
what's
your
approach
there,
because
it
feels
like
all
the
tooling
that
you
guys
have
belongs
to
you
guys
right.
So,
if
you
decide
to,
you
know,
write
off
to
this
to
the
sunset
for
lack
of
a
better
word.
H
Yeah,
I
think
automation
is
a
huge
thing
that
we
were
focused
on.
We
want
to
do
and
thankfully
the
pe
guys
are
quite
interested
in
automating
where
possible
as
well.
So
you
know
I
know
you
know.
Roone
is
desiring
to
accumulate
a
lot
of
ethers
to
eat.
I'm
not
sure,
I'm
not
sure.
If,
assuming
that
we
can,
you
know,
set
up
dss
kiln
to
do
that.
You
know
permissionlessly
without
like
anyone.
You
know
you
know
interfering
manually,
touching
it
you
just
set
up
to
purchase.
H
You
know
x
amount
of
eth
over
a
y
time
period
and
then
I
feel
like
we
can
also
in
the
future
kind
of
automate
how
the
the
you
know.
Protocol
vault
accumulates
assets,
and
you
know,
I
think
ruins
thinking
is
evolving
constantly
on
this.
But
I
imagine
that
we're
going
to
have
you
know
a
subset
of
like
stable
coin
lps
as
well,
that
the
dow
can
just
basically
permissionlessly
you
know,
buy
you
know
ufcc,
for
example,
you
know
pair
it
with
dye
and
then
just
like
drop
it
into.
H
You
know:
smart
contract,
that's
automating!
You
know
the
management
of
it
like
compounding
fees
like
g
uni
does
so
I
think,
there's
a
lot
of
ways
to
automate
in
the
future
and
that
you
know
some
that
we
can
even
do
today
and
then
you
know.
Lastly,
I'll
just
touch
on
that.
You
know
we
are
you
know
constantly
building
you
know
doing
queries
you
know.
Seb
has
one
that's
completely
public.
That
has
a
nice
summary.
H
We
just
posted
a
you
know
a
list
of
all
of
our
zoom
dashboards
that
we've
worked
on
for
maker.
It's
also
public.
I
can
make
a
separate
post
for
that
just
so
it's
more
broadly
disseminated,
but
all
that
work
is
you
know
it's
fully
automated.
Anyone
that
just
goes
to
zoom's
website
can
refresh
the
query
themselves.
They
don't
have
to
pay
for
a
membership,
and
then
the
information
will
just
update
and
you
can
see
you
know
the
financials
and
see
different
like
kpis,
like
you
know,
die
compared
to
other
stable
coins.
H
You
can
see
like
vault
market
share
for
e
throughout
bitcoin,
but
we're
definitely
you
know,
working
on
building
more
stuff
and
we're.
Definitely,
you
know
open
the
feedback
from
the
community.
If
there's
certain
things
they
want
to
see.
That's
you
know
completely
open.
D
Yeah
for
me
regarding
automation,
because,
like
I
think
I'm
I'm
getting,
I
think
my
a
little
bit.
Confusion
is
about
what
strategic
finances
goals
are,
and
I
think
like
for
me,
I'm
I'm
looking
a
lot
at
budgets
and
I
still
have
no
place
where
I
can
go
and
I
just
see
okay,
this
is
that
budget.
This
is
that
budget.
This
is
the
beaver.
This
is
not
delivered.
H
H
H
There
are
ways
that
you
can
do
it,
but
you
know
our
objective
within
strategic
finance
is
to
you
know,
provide
transparency
to
the
financial
health
of
the
dow
as
well
as
well,
as
you
know,
add
value
for
mkr
holders,
and
you
know,
we've
been
you
know
heavily
working
on
with
the
growth
team
on
you
know
some
some
ways
that
we
can
do
that
and
that'll
also
be
a
smooth
transition
into
the
end
game
plan
in
metadas.
H
So
you
know
we're
really
excited
for
these
deals
to
be
and
products
to
be
shared
with
the
community.
I
think
next
week
we'll
have
at
least
the
first
one
public
I'm
happy
to
share
that
the
details
with
delegates
privately
is
some
of
them
have
already
seen.
But
you
know
due
to
these,
you
know
projects
kind
of
still
being
in
the
works.
We
can't
fully
disclose
everything
publicly
yet.
H
Yeah
I
mean
we
are.
I
would
like
to
invest
more
in
building
out
a
literally
the
d5
standards
for
accounting.
H
H
So
we're
definitely
on
a
mission
to
continue
improving
that
I
don't
know
how
that
you
know
ranks
in
terms
of
roone's
priority
visually,
then
game
plan.
Obviously
my
last
budget
request
to
hire
an
actual
accountant
to
specifically
work
on
that
sort
of
stuff.
Full-Time
was
rejected.
You
know
obviously
impacted
by
the
dao's
financial
situation
and
the
bear
market,
but
yeah.
We
definitely
want
to
continue
to
improve
the
financial
reports,
continue
to
automate
them.
H
That's
you
know
heavy
focus,
for
you
know
adrian
and
dan,
on
the
team,
but
you
know
frankly
it's
something
where
we're
already
seen
as
a
leader
and
there's
other
areas
that
we
can
add
a
lot
more
value
that
we're
spending
time
on.
F
What
we're
going
to
do
this
month
is
put
a
summary
of
some
of
the
assumptions
that
we
make
and
link
them
to
the
calls.
So
you
can
see
step
by
step,
it's
very
simple
at
the
moment,
because
our
business
is
relatively
straightforward,
even
though
the
web
of
contracts
is
quite
complex,
but
I
think
this
is
kind
of
what
you're
alluding
to
in
terms
of
developing
accounting
standards
like
there
are
implied
standards.
F
I
think
if
you
have
any
specific
queries,
we're
always
happy
to
to
address
anything
that
comes
from
an
and
final
point.
Anything
that's
off-chain
will
likely
probably
rely
on
some
amount
of
manual
interaction
and
all
almost
all
of
the
governance
processes
through
the
mips
system
are
basically
social
contracts
that
happen.
Off-Chain
like
the
approval
and
mips
and
everything
are
voted
on
sure,
but
the
concept
of
a
budget
is
a
social
contract.
F
D
Okay,
thanks
that
that
already
kind
of
like
like
for
me,
it
was
always
a
little
bit
difficult
to
just
understand.
Where
are
you
coming
from,
but
I
think
mata
answered
that
really
well
like
that.
You
are
kind
of
leading
that
space
in
a
way,
but
for
me
I
think,
there's
still
a
lot
of
room
to
grow
in
just
this
budgeting
and
accounting,
and
I
think
it
could
also
be
a
great
product
right,
like
I
think,
there's
a
huge
market
out
there
for
these
solutions.
H
Yeah
I
mean
I
also
note
that
scs
is
actively
working
on
this
and
they
have
a
new
budgeting
tool
that
people
are
trying
to
use.
H
So
you
know
there's
a
lot
of
work
being
done
like
across
the
dow
and
obviously
we
have
a
very,
I
think,
small
budget
relative
to
other
core
units
and
yeah
there's
always
room
for
improvement.
That's
something
that
you
know
we
want
to
do
every
day
is
and
find
ways
to
improve.
It's
just
like
for
us.
It
comes
out
in
a
matter
of
yeah
one
just
linked
it.
H
If
you
want
to
take
a
look
at
it,
you
know
we're
really
just
trying
to
add
the
most
value
to
make
our
holders
as
possible
when
we
think
about
work,
prioritization-
and
you
know
automating
reports
on
top
of
what's
already
available
on
tune
that
we
have
is
we
don't
feel
it's
adding
as
much
value
as
other
initiatives.
A
H
I
just
yeah
happy
to
you,
know,
discuss
address
any
issues
or
if
you
guys
think
we
should
abstain
from
certain
things.
Obviously,
I'm
not
going
to
comment
on.
You
know
rune's
proposal
to
acquire
a
lot
of
maker
for
lido,
even
though
we're
not
formally
you
know
engaged
at
this
time
and
his
you
know
strategy
for
balance
sheet,
we're
certainly
gonna.
You
know
model
how
that
will
impact.
You
know
the
financials.
H
If
roon
decides
you
know
we
need
to
buy,
like
you
know,
100
million
200
million
500
million
of
eth
like
how
is
that
going
to
impact?
You
know
the
protocols,
financial
health.
Those
are
all
things
we're
gonna,
spend
time
modeling
on.
I
think
once
he
discloses
more,
you
know
of
his
vision
for
how
he
wants
the
protocol
to
you
know
decentralize
for
the
overtime.
H
You
know
it's
gonna,
be
a
lot
of.
I
think
work
and
expertise
from
sebastian,
but
yeah.
I
think,
as
we
look
to
you,
know,
transition
the
metadow.
You
know
there's
a
lot
of
like
budget
stuff
that
ruins
working
on
that,
I
think,
will
be
shared
as
well.
Soon.
You
know,
there's
you
know
these
commercial
partnerships
coming.
You
know,
there's
a
ton
of
things
that
are
and
then
yeah
roon
is
constantly
thinking
about.
You
know
how
how
much
youth
should
we
acquire
like
leveraging
it
to
buy
more?
H
These
are
all
things
that
we
need
to
consider
to
protect.
You
know
die
holders
and
ensure
the
protocol.
Is
you
know
as
healthy
as
possible,
so
yeah?
I
think
the
risk
team
will
probably
also
be
you
know,
involved
in
looking
at
these
factors,
but
yeah.
It's
definitely
something
that
will
be
important
for
us.
A
All
right,
thank
you
mark.
I
appreciate
that
I've
got
a
couple
of
things
popping
up
here
in
the
chat
one
is
promises
is
asking
about.
Commercial
relationships
are
coming
question
mark
just
wanted
to
put
that
out
there
for
feedback.
H
Yeah
sure
so,
similar
to
world
finance,
I'm
sure
you
know
robert
and
his
position,
people
even
you,
know,
growth
or
really
any
core
unit.
If
there's
people
that
work
at
other
companies
crypto
or
outside
of
crypto,
they
want
to
work
with
maker
and
people
reach
out,
and
I
started
working
with
nadia
and
john
from
growth.
H
When
institutional
vaults
first
became
a
product
to
help,
you
know
ensure
that
maker
we
could
model
the
financial
implications
of
any.
You
know,
deals
that
were
struck
and
any
mips
that
were
forthcoming
as
well
as
help
you
know,
fight
for
maker
holders
and
make
sure
that
the
dow
got.
You
know
very
strong
terms,
because
I
think
historically
you
know
some
people
will
come
to
the
dow
and
obviously
they're
going
to
request.
H
You
know
the
best
deal
for
them,
and
you
know
if,
if
you're
not
modeling
out
the
requests
from
counterparties,
you
know
you
could
get
stuck
with
a
deal.
That's
not
very
economically
strong
for
for
maker.
So
you
know:
we've
kind
of
been
brought
in
at
the
request
of
growth
to
help
ensure
that
you
know
maker
is
getting
a
fair
end
of
the
stick.
When
these
proposals
are
coming
down,
obviously
you
know
we're
just
offering
our
opinion
on
that.
H
It's
the
counterparties
can
do
whatever
they
want,
but
you
know,
maker
holders
will
ultimately
decide.
You
know
what
will
be
onboarded
what's
the
important
of
the
importance
of
it,
but
you
know.
Nevertheless,
you
know
we
want
to
make
sure
that
makers,
financial
health
is
protected
and
that
we're
not
getting
people
trying
to
take
advantage
of
us.
A
All
right,
thank
you
mark
just
up
note
juan
just
added
to
the
chat
he
posted
the
forum.
I
think
this
is
make
it
expenses.
Dashboard
is
live
post
in
the
forum.
So
just
let
me
let
everyone
know
so
with
that.
I'm
gonna
open
the
floor
back
up
to
see
if
the
the
delegates
here
have
any
more
questions
or
comments
for
this
discussion.
A
With
that
said,
we've
got.
I
think
this
is
going
to
be
be
brought
over
to
the
gnr
call
on
our
discussion
today.
So
I
think
we're
going
to
have
that
as
well,
so
you'll
be
able
to
join
us.
That
would
be
great
to
continue
this
conversation,
and
now
I
just
like
to
open
the
floor
to
any
other
topics
that
we'd
like
to
discuss.
E
I'll
just
echo
something
mark
said
earlier,
which
is
just
that
things
are
extraordinarily
fluid
right
now,
in
case
you
just
have
been
living
under
a
rock
on
the
forums,
but
more
broadly
for
any
other
audience
person
who
happens
to
catch
this
on
youtube
with,
like
10
people
watch
these
it's
really
important
to
just
zoom
out
and
try
and
capture.
If
people
have
best
intentions
which
the
one
thing
I've
noticed
with
maker,
it
tends
to
be
that
people's
hearts
are
in
the
right
place,
even
if
they
don't
communicate
what
that
happens
to
be.
E
There
are
some
specific
forum
posts
that
might
articulate
that
point
of
view
a
little
bit
more.
But
again,
I
just
think
that
september
is
going
to
be
a
really
active
month
and
if
we
try
to
aspire
to
something
better
and
provide
better
comments
on
where
things
are
going
and
be
more
direct
and
feedback
to
improve,
I
think
we'll
all
be
in
a
better
place.
But
if
we
start
spending
all
this
time
thinking,
people
are
acting
with
bad
intentions
and
trying
to
be
like
inherently
selfish.
E
E
You
know,
I
think,
in
the
context
of
this
whole
lido
thing
to
me.
It
just
seems
like
someone
made
a
decision
to
wait
until
a
vote
was
passed
to
the
intel
maker
or
some
other
community,
like
people
work
for
other
dows
everywhere
else
right.
It
just
was
a
communication
gap
right.
It
was
one
decision
that
then
spiraled,
because
people
reacted-
and
I
understand
both
sides
of
that
argument,
but
ultimately,
like
strategically
it
kind
of
makes
a
lot
of
sense
and
people
can
work
wherever
they
want.
That's
the
point
of
taos,
so.
E
A
I
thank
tim
for
those
comments.
I
appreciate
that
all
right,
I'm
gonna,
continue
to
up
the
floor
to
see
if
anyone
else
as
any
additional
comments,
questions.
A
We
still
got
about
about
10
or
so
minutes
left
in
the
meeting
today.
So
you
want
to
make
sure
everybody
gets
their
say
or
input.
A
Any
any
thoughts
on
the
end
game
meeting
from
yesterday
any
any
other
thoughts
on
that
it
was
a
lot.
It's
been
that
as
well,
so.
A
Okay,
all
right
well
order
break
yeah.
Absolutely
I
hope
you
could
join
us.
Thank
you
all
for
joining
us
today
with
no
other
feedback,
we'll
just
wrap
it
up
here
for
today
and
hopefully
see
you
on
the
gnr
call
here
shortly.
Thank
you
for
joining
us
and
hope
to
see
you
very
soon.