►
B
A
I
think
the
most
I
mean
so
the
most
important
thing
I
want
to
try
to
like.
So
of
course,
first
of
all,
what's
coming
soon,
I
mean
it's
like
we've
already
had
this
like
real
asset
collateral
scope,
framework
example,
post
and
so
what's
coming,
and
what
I'm
aiming
to
to
Output
right
before
Christmas
basically
is
like
sort
of
a
scaffolding
version
of
that
like
that
of
every
single
scope
framework
and
then
also
the
Constitution
itself
right.
So
we
have
this
kind
of
like
visual
sense
and
almost
like
the
yeah.
A
A
So
we'll
just
go
through
that
today
and
then
there
you'll
have
some
like
sense
of
like
I
can
get
some
feedback
now,
so
I
can
have
that.
I
can
incorporate
that
for
like
when
the
skeleton
is
shared
and,
of
course
it's
important
I
mean
I.
Think
I
really
attempted
to
communicate
this
very
clearly
with
the
real
asset.
Let's
go
framework,
but
of
course
these
things
are
not
like.
They
don't
contain
the
final
content
right
they're.
Not.
This
is
actually
not
really
about
the
content.
A
A
That's
not
that's
these
first
versions,
they're
not
supposed
like
they're,
not
supposed
to
be
populated
with
content.
That's
actually
going
to
stick
around.
That's
also
a
language.
That's
just
placeholder!
That's
supposed
to
be
replaced
and,
of
course,
we'll
continue
to
have
that
in
q1
as
well,
because
that
sort
of
generally
how
this
whole
process,
always
or
at
least
for
a
very
long
time
will
work,
is
that
we
don't
just
put
like
final
definitive
stuff
in.
We
also
put
sort
of
things
where
that's
more,
like
a
declaration
of
intent.
A
So
more
like
we
try
to
agree
sort
of
more
fussy
of
like
we're
sort
of
trying
to
do
this
and
then
a
quarter
later
we
can
narrow
it
down
more
like
now.
We
know
that
this
is
actually
where
we're
looking
at
and
then
maybe
one
quarter
later,
we
can
be
like
okay.
Now
we
can
make
an
actual,
you
know
enforceable
section,
a
class
or
article
or
whatever
that
and
we
actually
Define
some
real
sort
of
enforcement
classes
or
whatever
you
want
to
call
it
enforcement
elements.
I,
don't
know.
B
A
A
Obviously
what
the
in-game
Constitution
is,
except
that's
like
really
sort
of
operationalized
through
now
we're
using
a
MIP
to
implement
it.
So
now
it's
going
to
be
for
real
right
and
I.
Think
that's
just
so
that
first
of
all,
it's
going
to
be
I
think
a
useful
way
to
use
this
whole
thing
to,
like
literally
in
rename
the
in-game
plan
to
the
in-game
Constitution
and
start
yourself.
Think
of
it
in
that
way.
Right
and
then
what
that
of
course
means
is
naturally
the
whole
thing
kind
of
grows
out
of
the
Constitution
right.
B
A
And
then
what's
interesting,
so
so
that
means
is
like
all
these
bullet
points
here,
they're
supposed
to
basically
cover
everything
right
and
so.
First
of
all,
there's
of
course,
like
we've
got
here
in
the
middle,
we've
got
the
Scopes
right,
which
I
think
at
this
point
we
sort
of
talked
about
with
talked
about
quite
a
bit.
Then
there's
like
all
this
stuff
here,
which
is
a
little
bit
more
nebulous,
but
this
is
kind
of
the
in
some
sense.
This
is
like
everything
that
goes
here
is
actually
related
to
this
scope.
A
Arbitration
to
some
extent
also
this
scope,
governance
security,
but
basically
that
these
are
like
the
these.
Are
the
rules
about
the
things
that
have
this
kind
of
that
that
that
have
this
kind
of
meta
governance,
impact
or
role
in
the
rule
set
right
that
that
they
really
determine
like
in
the
end
sort
of
the
Dynamics
of.
B
A
Even
made
the
decisions
about
these
things
themselves
and
which
is
why
it's
relevant
for
the
arbitration
scope,
because
that
sort
of
any
kind
of
official
advice
to
voters,
and
also
you
know,
actions
related
to
I
mean
especially
voting
front
ends
right,
especially
this
thing.
The
easy
building
front
end,
which
is
really
good
it
related
to
to
voter
incentives
and
how
they
apply.
I
mean
how
yeah
how
they
basically
apply
to
to
how
they
interact.
With
what
front
end
you
see,
and
all
that
stuff.
A
But
then
another
way
to
sort
of
think
about
this,
like
think
about
the
Constitution
as
the
complete
you
know,
encapsulation
of
the
entire
end
game
and
being
sort
of
the
rip.
You
know
the
the
you
know
like
the
new
name
for
the
in-game
plan
and
sort
of
the
replacement
for
the
in-game
plan
itself
right
in
essence,
another
look
at
that
is
to
try
to
sort
of
show
it
with
these.
Oh.
A
A
B
A
A
Yeah,
okay,
but
so
so,
basically
for
a
long
time
right.
The
way
I've
been
you
know,
basically
explaining
all
the
Dynamics
of
endgame
is
using
these
three
different
figures
right.
So
it's
like
this
kind
of
value
flow
and
tokenomics
and
sort
of
meta
engineering
chart
over
here
with
all
these
like
different
colors
and
lines,
and
all
this
crazy,
like
relationships
between
the
incentives
of
different
actors
and
then
there's
this
sort
of
orc
chart
like
thing
right.
A
When
you
combine
with
all
these
other
elements-
and
so
the
point
is
that
you
can
actually
in
some
ways
all
of
these
bullets
here,
actually
simply
contain
these
three
things,
so
they
sort
of
so
these
three
things
and
they're
sort
of
way
to
verify
all
the
right.
But
this
is
like
this
is
the
complete
thing
in
some
sense
that
all
of
the
information
in
the
Constitution
sort
of
can
be
I
mean
you
can
look
at
the
Constitution
from
the
perspective
of
each
of
these
diagrams.
A
A
Yeah
so
David,
what
are
the?
What
are
the
principles
that
features
of
the
Constitution?
So
that's
actually
like.
That's
basically
like
all
the
introductory
stuff
coming
from
like,
if
you
look
at
the
old
in-game
posts
right
all
these,
like
the
things
like
complexity,
spiraling,
principal
agent,
problem
iron
law,
bureaucracy,
trying
to
take
away
the
power,
spirally
incentives,
meta
engineering,
all
that
kind
of
stuff,
so
kind
of
I
mean
the
way
I'm
in
the
way.
I
think
is
the
right
approach
around
is
to
have
some
kind
of
essay
like
approach
to
it
almost
right.
A
So
it's
not!
So
it's
not
that
time
like
rigorous,
like
sort
of
like
Rule
and
then
enforcement
of
that
rule,
because
that's
this
is
that
it's
more
General
aspirations
and
principles,
but
they
do
really
I
mean,
but
there's
and
they're,
so
abstract
and
so
sort
of
metaphysical.
Almost
right.
That
is,
you
can't
really
like
it
would
defeat
the
purpose
to
try
to
put
them
in
in
sort
of
a
highly
specific
rules,
because
you
can
never
make
rules
like
you.
A
But
if,
as
long
as
I,
basically
almost
pretty
much
anyone
I
mean
just
a
few
people,
even
that
should
then
be
enough
for
all
the
other
stuff
to
sort
of
work
out
and
and
everyone
else
can
then
be
corrupt.
As
long
as
you've
got
some
MPR
holders
that
that
kind
of
you
know
act
according
to
these
principles
and.
B
A
There's
also
something
I
mean
I
haven't
that's
not
a
that's
not
in
my
drafts
yet,
but
there's
even
something
like
a
kind
of
code
of
conduct
and
that
kind
of
stuff
right
like
so
really
like
high
level
like
who
are
we?
What
are
the?
What
are
we
thinking?
How
do
we
interact
with
each
other?
How
do
we
well
right?
What
are
the
sort
of
our?
What
should
you
you
know?
A
Because
then,
ultimately,
the
whole
point
is
that
again,
like
the
arbitration,
the
arbitration
scope
and
that
whole
sort
of
function
is
going
to
ultimately
be
like
dealing
with.
You
know
all
the
kind
of
power
struggle-ish
cases
we're
going
to
run
into,
and
a
lot
of
that
will
then
like
decisions.
You
know
on
related
to
those
situation
like
for
those
situations
right,
they'll
have
to
draw
on
stuff
like
sort
of
what
are
our
core
principles
like?
What
do
we
know
is
like
what
sizes
together?
A
What
brings
us
together-
and
you
know,
what's
the
rational
way
to
vote
in
that
sense,
so
that
we
don't
go
against
the
kind
of
stable
meta
right
and-
and
we
don't
betray
our
values,
because
we
sort
of
understand
that
you
know
should
like.
Should
the
meta
start
to
fall
apart
and
the
sort
of
stability
of
the
end
game
start
to
fall
apart,
then
we
basically
expect
the
whole
thing
to
to
to
fail
right,
and
so
it
ends
up
becoming
sort
of
rational
to
follow
these
more
aspirational
values.
Actually.
A
A
A
You
know
the
purpose
system
and
clean
money
and
that
kind
of
stuff
right
at
the
top
right,
because
ultimately,
it's
a
fundamental
reality
that
you
can't
rely
on.
You
know
profit
seeking
for
for
dial
governance.
Basically,
so
then,
with
that
and
with
that,
and
but
with
with
this
sort
of
land
in
place,
then
we
basically
assume
now
we've
sort
of
established
the
requirements
that
we're,
assuming
that
now
we
have
mkl
holders
that
are
acting
based
on
something.
A
More
than
simply,
you
know
personal
profit
mode,
okay,
and
then
we
just
get
into
all
the
tools
right
and
then,
like
I
said,
we've
got
the
subdials
the
front.
The
voting
front
end
right.
That's
immediately
like
this
is
everything
I
mean
I've
talked
about
this
before,
but
it's
like
so
crazy,
almost
how
extremely
powerful,
whatever
set
of
rules
we
end
up
putting
in
here
that
go
into
the
Constitution
and
then
end
up
becoming
permanent
and
absolutely
totally
unchangeable
and
they're.
A
Just
gonna
have
such
a
complete
massive
impact
on
everything,
because
I
mean
these
are
like
the
rules
for
like
what
how
decisions
are
made.
Ultimately,
because
I
mean
up
here,
we
establish
we're
doing
motor
incentives
and
then
here
we
establish
what
does
it
look?
I
mean:
what
is
it?
What
what
game
are
you
playing
when
you're
coming
to
get
your
voter
incentives
right?
Because
that's
as
far
that's
as
much
as
we
can
get
out
of
it
is
we
we're
paying
people
to
vote
and
then
at
best
they'll
sort
of
play.
A
Then
we
get
into
the
sub
components
of
that
right,
which
are
the
decentralized
motor
committees
which
is
in
some
sense.
That
is
the
most
I.
Guess,
sort
of
the
most
powerful
kind
of
concept
right
in
in
this
whole,
this
whole
setup
right
because
that's
the
point
where
you
have
this
sort
of
self-reinforcement,
where
the
voter
front
end
shows-
and
let
me
move
over
to
the
you
know,
so
that
the
easy
voter
front
end
actually
ranks
dvcs
based
on
popularity
right.
A
A
B
A
And
the
thing
about
delegates
is
they
get
paid
really
well
right,
they're,
so
professionals,
the
dvcs
are
volunteers
right,
they
don't
get
paid.
Maybe
they
get
paid
some
small
amount,
but
but
the
delegates
are
like
full-time
professionals
that,
with
with
basically
a
pay
raise
compared
to
today,
right
where
they
actually
receive
MPL
Jones
and
in
the
long
run
they
actually
end
up
becoming
the
only
that's
my
latest,
my
latest
iteration
of
the
com
model
I'm
working
on.
A
They
will
end
up
being
the
only
type
of
I
guess:
ecosystem
actor
that
actually
receives
mkr
directly,
while
all
the
other
types
of
Manufacturers,
eventually
over,
like
a
very
long
time
period,
but
eventually
the
end.
The
end
point
is
that
they
they
only
receive
subtle
rules,
but
Australians
are
not
affiliated
with
subtle.
They
get
MP3,
and
then
they
have
all
the
power
right.
A
Voters
who
just
want
to
get
paid
to
vote
so
they're
going
to
go
in
maybe
they're
going
to
look
read
some
of
the
like
read
about
the
dvcs
as
a
part
of
the
the
sort
of
the
game
right,
that's
being
being
presented
to
them.
Maybe
they'll
even
ignore
that,
but
then
to
move
ahead
and
just
start
getting
the
money,
which
is
what
they're
there
for
they
have
to
pick
a
delegate.
A
So
then
they'll
pick
a
delegate
and
then
yeah,
possibly
they
will.
They
will
make
the
decision
about
what
strategy
should
the
delegate
follow
and
they'll
have
a
stance
on?
Should
it
be
I
would
do
it
once
more
Surplus?
Do
we
want
more
growth
or
resilience
right
or
something
else,
and
maybe
they
will
even
like
look
into
who's?
The
delegate
and
how
they
actually
are
they
actually
like?
How
does
this
person
Implement
Surplus?
What
are
the
house
principle?
Is
this
person
how
the
competent
are
they?
A
So
that's
exactly
why,
if
you
look
at
sort
of
the
countries
of
the
world,
the
ones
where
the
military
is
kind
of
like
deeply
involved
in
running
the
government
and
I,
don't
know
doing
a
random.
You
know
like
a
very
present
in
everyday
life
that
tends
to
be
like
crappy,
dictatorships,
right
and
and
well-functioning
countries
the
military
in
those
countries.
They
don't
really
actually
do
anything
right,
except
in
emergencies
or
or
in
some
worst
case
scenario,
where
there
is
some
kind
of
threat
to
the
Constitution
right.
A
So
that's
your
result
in
basically
the
entire
sort
of
professional
Workforce
of
delegates,
all
being
people
whose
main
concern
is
just
like
ensuring
that
we
don't
step
out
of
line
in
terms
of
of
you
know
like
overstepping
the
Constitution
right.
So
that
would
mean
that
delegate
I
mean
the
sort
of
natural
iron
law
of
bureaucracy.
A
As
a
paper-esque,
have
any
large
holders
expressed
the
willingness
to
increase
their
care
and
governance
in
exchange
for
compensation,
so
I
I
I,
don't
think
so.
I
think
there
are
some.
There
may
be
a
few,
but
I
actually
think
that
in
general,
the
large
institutional
holders
they'll
prefer
letting
others
get
the
get
the
rewards
and
become
Free.
Riders
I
mean
remain
free
writers
right,
which
is
perfectly
I,
mean
that's
a
perfect
and
and
completely
fine
in
the
end
game
right
because
it's
a
whole.
It's
a
system
where,
if
you.
A
In
governance,
you
get
paid
really
well,
but
you
also
I
mean
you.
Ultimately
you
make
a
decision
and
maybe
there's
even
some
jurisdictions.
Some
people
will
feel
that
they
have
some
more
legal
exposure
or
responsibility,
or
you
know,
moral
responsibility
who
knows
right
for
some
reason:
there's
there's
some
kind
of
cost
associated
with
participating
governance,
which
is
why
not
everyone's
doing
it
all
the
time.
A
Right,
of
course,
there's
also
the
gas
costs,
but
it
works
perfectly
well
because
then,
the
like,
if
the
more
Free
Riders
there
are
the
better
the
yield
for
those
that
do
participate
and
then
you're
gonna,
the
Free
Riders
are
basically
going
to
be
paying
others
to
to
start
participating
right
and
the
way
they'll
be
paying,
is
through
getting
diluted,
and
so
it
all
sort
of
checks
out
in
this
scenario
right.
So
what
I
expect
will
happen
is
we'll
get
all
these
like
I
mean
we'll
we'll
get
the
more
sort
of
you
know.
A
Anon
render
or
crypto
Twitter
the
dark
corners
of
the
internet
types
to
be
the
ones
that
delegate
rather
than
the
sort
of
the
the
whales
right
and
and
then
in
that
context,
like
I,
would
expect
pretty
much
from
the
moment
that
game
launches
the
entire
sort
of
like
a
dynamic
of
governance
or
just
completely
like
flip,
and
it
will
pretty
much
get
like
it'll,
be
like
a
snapshot
of
that
moment.
That
will
pretty
much
get
get
stuck.
A
Maybe
it'll
be
possible
for
it
to
change
somewhat,
but
but
it
will
get
very
quickly.
It
will
get
very
stuck
right
and
it'll
be
because,
like
nobody,
even
when
people
vote
right,
they
bear
I
mean
nobody
really
actually
follows
along
in
governments
that
much
right
and
and
then
when
they
do,
they
will
do
it
because
it's
easy
for
them,
because
they
have
the
context
and
because
they
have
information
available,
and
we
basically
have
this
whole
funnel
built
right
where
you
can
participate
in
the
dbcs.
A
You
can
split
out
and
and
so
on
right,
but
it's
all
sort
of
regulated
in
the
sense
that
the
more
the
the
the
more
established
other
more
like
they
sort
of
the
system
is
sort
of
automatically
biased
towards
the
the
more
established
ones
right
and
then
you
have
all
the
delegates
and
they're
basically
really
hyper
focused
on
following
the
Constitution,
meaning
they
also
act
as
a
you
know.
They
also
they
also
act
as
a
check
on
the
dvcs
and
then
there's
this
whole
gamification
of
like
the
average
guy.
A
Yeah
and
then
there's
like
mandated
actors,
and
that's
then,
where
we
get
into
kind
of
the
whole
like
how
we
like
the
this
diagram
right
of
like
how
do
all
the
people
then
actually
interact
right
and
then,
like
in
the
we'll,
have
to
write
the
Constitution
in
the
context
of
Governor
dials
being
active,
it's
going
to
be
a
little
bit
weird,
well
yeah!
So
it's
exactly
right
so
because
that's
a
good
thing
like
a
mandated
actor
in
the
end
game
context
is
basically
actually
subtitles
and
it's
like
it's
also.
A
So
it's
a
way
that
sort
of
the
delegates
interact
with
the
subtitles
to
then
sort
of
kind
of
execute
or
or
Implement
the
Scopes,
and
then
there's
all
this
stuff.
I
mean
there's
the
same
kind
of
stuff
that,
like
constitutionality
and
you
know,
dealing
with
the
risk
of
corruption
and
iron,
loft
bureaucracy
and
separation
of
concerns,
and
all
this
kind
of
stuff
right
and
then
finally,
there's
the
there's
hot
coding
over
here,
maybe
I
should
scale
is
up.
A
And
that's
of
course,
the
really
I
mean
that's
even
more
complicated
process
compared
to
the
Constitution,
and
so
one
thing,
that's
clear
now
is
that
the
scope
Frameworks
are
going
to
be
just
absolutely
incredibly
huge.
Given
this
kind
of
you
know
the
the
the
the
principle
that
the
end
game
Constitution
contains
everything
right.
So
the
scroll
framework
like
so
there's
not
going
to
be
any
documents
that
actually
mattered
beyond
the
in-game
Constitution
and
the
scope
Frameworks.
A
And
but
also
what
this,
what
in
the
Constitution
itself,
the
scope
Frameworks
are
listed
and
then
they're
provided
their
constitutional
boundaries
right.
So
that's
they're,
sort
of
the
most
important
stuff
that
basically
they'll
never
really
be
able
to
break
beyond
what
these
constitutional
boundaries
are.
But
they
can
do
a
lot
of
operationalization
Within
those
boundaries.
A
And
then,
but
then,
and
then
even
at
the
starting
point
I
mean,
then
they
have
some
kind
of
ossification
building
into
them
to
themselves,
but
that
the
level
of
ossification
that
occurs
in
the
scope.
Frameworks
is
nothing
like
the
level
of
oxidation
that
occurs
in
the
Constitution
and
then
there's
sort
of
the
final
pieces
right.
It's
like
that's
the
the
amendment
process
for
the
Constitution,
because,
of
course,
initially
we'll
have
to
like
change
it
a
lot
right,
but
we
want
to
very
quickly
get
it
to
a
point
where
it
doesn't.
A
A
So
the
Constitution
like
really
really
ossifies
quite
quickly
and
the
scope
Frameworks
also
flies
more
slowly
and
actually
will
always
be
changeable
to
some
extent
and
then
so
David
asks.
Let
me
just
answer
these
questions.
David
asks
I
thought.
Expo
framers
are
within
the
Constitution,
so
the
Constitutional
boundaries
for
the
scope
Frameworks
are
within
the
Constitution,
but
the
physical
Frameworks
themselves
aren't
they're
separate
mips
right,
so
the
Constitution
is
one
myth.
A
A
And
so
the
sort
of
the
Practical
reason
why
the
scope
Frameworks
are
separate
from
the
Constitution
is
that
this
then
allows
us
to
use
the
mid
process
and
mips
zero.
Basically,
as
like
the
underlying
infrastructure
to
build,
the
I
mean
the
the
ossification
in
or
maybe
more
like,
the
the
modification
processes
into
it
right.
A
A
A
A
So
they're,
like
they're
manufacturers,
as
we
know
today,
but
collateralized
right,
so
that
you
can.
You
can
penalize
them
for
for
basically
failing
to
follow
the
Constitution,
and
that's
also,
what
like?
That's
that's
really
the
critical
thing
that
I
mean
that
you
know
one
of
the
really
core
principles
of
the
in-game
Constitution
is
that
it
like
takes
this
approach
that,
like
nothing
matters
unless
there's
like
this
very,
very
well-specified
penalty,
into
the
consequence
of
what
happens
if
it
if
this
doesn't
occur,
what
happens
or
if
this
occurs?
What
happens
right?
A
A
A
B
A
You
know
like
code,
basically
like
like
algorithms,
and
then
they
just
like
operate
based
on.
What's
like
supposed
to
happen
in
this
particular
situation.
Right
and
and
and
the
whole
point
is
they're
constantly
like
interpreting
the
Constitution,
to
figure
out
we're
sort
of
designated,
as
you
know,
we're
a
man's,
an
actor
in
some
particular
role
right.
Maybe
we're
a
Tribunal
for
infrastructure
or
we're
a
co-
unit
for
realized
collateral
or
some
other
thing,
and
then
there's
all
these
like
rules
that
apply
to
them.
A
If
we
can
reach
that
point
right
and
that
also
further,
just
like,
like
increases
sort
of
the
likelihood
that
we
can
get
to
a
point
where
everybody's
Anonymous
right
and
we
enforce
that
total
privacy,
so
that
it's
actually
sort
of
impossible
to
to
like
determine
who
is
actually
like.
Who
are
the
people
involved
in
sort
of
operating
running
the
day-to-day
process
of
the
Dow?
A
A
That's
that
populates,
the
entire
in-game
Constitution
and
all
the
scope,
Frameworks
and
all
the
sort
of
different
mechanics
and
and
really
just
like
get
them
defined
as
well
as
possible
and
then
just
like
basically
iterate
on
them
over
the
next
three
quarters,
as
I
said
right
increasingly
getting
into
this
Cadence
of
using
the
the
dvcs
as
we're
going
to
start
doing
in
q1,
so
that
we
actually
sort
of
start
like
locking
into
some
kind
of
Rhythm.
That
is
not
going
to
change.
A
David
asks
what's
the
difference
between
councils
and
tribunals,
yeah,
that's
a
good
question
and
I
mean
I'm
still
working
with
like
the
the
language,
for
this
is
actually
one
of
the
most
difficult
things
that
like
I'm,
not
it's
I
have
a
like
one
way
to
to
specify.
It
would
be
something
like
you
have
advisory.
Council
like
you
could
even
use
coordinates
right.
You
say
you
have
advisory
core
units,
you
have
executive
coordinates
and
you
have
Consolidated
coordinates
or
something
like
that.
A
A
And
then,
because
of
that,
there
will
be
way
more
budget
in
the
primary
schools
and
budget
is
really
one
of
them.
I
mean
absolutely
fundamental
points
of
concern
for
the
NBA
prostitution
right
because,
of
course,
nowhere
are
sort
of
the
potential
for
for
things
to
go
bad
and
then
things
to
go
corrupt
and
The
Meta
to
to
slide.
Nowhere
is
that
bigger
than
when
it
comes
to,
you
know
allocating
budgets
and
struggling
resources
right.
A
So
the
primary
Scopes
has
this
additional
like
there's.
This
General
principle
of
like
separational
concerns
right
where
you
have
the
governor
of
the
house
running
the
Scopes,
also
advising
the
voters
and
the
Scopes,
and
then
the
creators
and
protectors
kind
of
like
doing
the
actual
leg
work
but
yeah.
So
the
red
numbers
are
like.
A
Like
an
estimate
of
like
actual
like
I
mean
it
says,
I
mean,
and
it's
completely
it's
an
estimate.
I
made
at
one
point
based
on
this
completely
sort
of
short-term
look
at
who
are
the
actual
like
sort
of
mandated
actor
level
or
pseudo-matic
level
head
count
for
each
of
these,
and
that's
what's
needed
right
so
and
so,
what's
sorry
actually
I
mean
I
I
kind
of
this
very
rapidly
changed
topic
there.
Sorry,
let
me
just
write
about
the
other
one.
A
So
the
point
is
that
you
know
so:
you've
got
you've,
got
councils
and
coordinates.
You
got
this
internal
separation
of
concerns
in
the
primary
scope
and
the
secondary
school.
You
only
got
tribunals
right
anyway.
So
then,
so
the
red
numbers
they're,
like
an
estimate
of
head
count,
I
mean
I
mean
not
at
all
like
it's
a
very
very
it's.
It's
not
to
try
to
coordinate
head
count,
or
it's
not
related
to
that.
It's
rather
it's
related
to
I
mean
it
was.
It's
simply.
A
You
have
to
run
it
directly,
which
is
like
how
I
think
we
need
to
you
know
we
need
to
be
able
to
operate
like
that,
because
that's
sort
of
one
of
the
I
mean
one
big
sort
of
downside
of
endgame.
Is
it
has
this
very
heavy?
You
know
it
has
a
lot
of
fixed
costs
in
the
sense
that
there's
a
certain
amount
of
bureaucracy
that
it
implements
and,
and
it's
not
I
mean
and
the
problem
is.
A
We
can't
you'll
be
a
mistake
to
assume
that
exactly
the
amount
of
bureaucracy
that
we
can
we
can
afford
today,
that's
exactly
what
we
can
use
to
scale
to
infinite
size
right.
So
rather
it
sort
of
assumes
that
you
know
that
that
we
can
get
to
a
slightly
larger
size,
basically
maybe
even
some
kind
of
double
triple
our
current
size
and
then
from
there
that's
at
the
at
that
level
of
sort
of
bureaucratic
Mass.
A
So
you
might
see
that
over
time
it'll
be
increasingly,
you
know,
it'll
move
towards
maybe
more
like
something
like
80
20
or
something
and
yeah
I.
Don't
think
that's
something
you
can
really
predict
that.
So
that's
not
something
we
could
really
try
to
put
into
the
Constitution
I
think
maybe
some
like
big
principles
about
it
or
something
would
be-
might
be
useful
to
put
in
there
foreign
ERS
like
this
one
up
here,
which
is
like
a
really
big
deal
right.
A
So,
like
the
the
the
amount
of
delicate
slots
available
right
because,
as
I
said
earlier,
we're
gonna.
We
need
to,
we
need
to
significantly
increase
the
daily
compensation
and
make
the
delegate
roll
a
lot
more
competitive,
but
then
also
have
this
kind
of
term
or
something
like
that.
So
you
can
actually
both
you
know
you're
both
a
very
high
competition
for
the
delegate
roles.
A
Eventually
we
may
want
to
have.
Maybe
it's
more
like
I
mean,
maybe
in
like
the
super
long
run,
it
could
be
something
like
30,
plus
30.
or
maybe
even
more
I'm,
not
really
sure.
What's
like
The
Logical
thing
to
emulate,
you
know
it
could
be
that
we
want
to
try
to
emulate
like
a
parliament
or
something
eventually
right,
so
it
could
be
like
a
hundred
delegates.
A
A
Whatever
call
we
make
during
the
pre-em
is
going
to
pretty
much
be
like
I
mean
there
may
be
some
small
changes
to
it,
but
it's
going
to
be
it's
one
of
those
things
where
it's
very
hard
to
change
that,
after
effect
like
there's
so
many
you
know,
the
delegates
themselves
will
have
such
a
strong
motivation
to
like
manipulate
that
number
and
in
their
own
favor.
That
there'll
be
such
extreme
scrutiny
on
the
sort
of
unconstitutionality
of
attempting
to
do
that.
B
A
A
I,
don't
know
I
mean,
maybe
the
last
thing
I
want
to
ask
is
like
if
there's
some
kind
of
obvious
high
level
thing,
that's
missing,
I
mean
also
like
a
road
in
the
Forum
post
right.
It
would
be
really
because
I've
already
been
through
that
several
times
in
the
process
of
trying
to
like
develop
this
over
multiple
iterations
and
I've,
basically
noticed
that
sometimes
there's
just
this
like
massive
capital,
I
forgot
about
and
and
then
I
have
to
sort
of
rethink.
A
The
whole
thing
so
would
be
very
helpful
if
people
can
help
me
see
if
there
are
more
of
those
like
gaps
or
sort
of
the
logic
leaps
that
need
to
be
dealt
with,
because
they
can
once
you
then
deal
with
those,
they
can
have
a
big
impact
on
like
the
overall.
You
can
really
sort
of
reshuffle
the
whole
thing.
A
The
Nadia
asks.
When
do
you
plan
to
release
the
first
version
of
The
Constitution,
and
when
are
we
starting
with
the
Scopes,
so
I've
planned
to
release
all
of
this,
like
all
of
that
before
Christmas?
But
once
again,
it's
not
going
to
be
like
it's
going
to
be
sort
of
full
placeholder
versions
in
a
sense
right.
So
so
it's
going
to
be
stuff
that
will
more
provide
the
kind
of
like
the
scaffolding
to
a
large
extent
right
and
it
will
be
very
modifiable
during
q1
and
then
in
q1.
A
A
And
then
people
can
sort
of
schedule
that
in
advance
right
I
mean
with
with
with
me
directly
potentially
or
maybe
with
like
Juan
and
retro
as
well
right,
who
are
sort
of
who
are
preparing
to
to,
in
general,
like
sort
of
run,
the
ecosystem
scope
right,
which
is
overall
responsible
like
to
have
this
meta
responsibility
right
and
then
so.
The
point
is
to
try
to
you
know,
get
a
little
bit
more
specific
on
some
of
the
operationalization
and
the
kind
of
the
the
process
for
like
providing
input
formally
on
in
this.
A
You
know
what's
good
for
them
right.
What
makes
sense
to
them.
Not
just
interest
actually
also
just
like
different
ideologies
and
perspectives
on
how
maker
should
be
run
right
and
then
the
goal
is
we
want
to
start
with
the
stuff?
That's
you
know
we
want
to
start
with
some
of
the.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
we
focus
early
on
the
things
that
are
more
difficult
right,
so
that
we
don't
like
go
through
like
two
months
of
boring
stuff
and
then
in
the
last
month.
A
A
A
And
then
we
can
start
getting
into
the
the
head,
like
the
muscle
memory
of
actually
running
the
the
the
DVC
subcommittee
meetings,
the
way
they're
supposed
to
be
run
according
to
the
Constitutional
and
well
I'm,
basically,
most
importantly,
actually
ratify
the
first
version
of
The
Constitution
right
by
by
Q2,
and
then
we
go
through
Q2.
And
then
we
try
to
update
the
Constitution
and
update
all
the
scope
Frameworks
and
we
go
through
Q3.
A
But
still
kind
of
you
know
the
early
game
right
where
things
can
still
change
quite
a
lot,
and-
and
you
know
there
can
still
be
you
know-
it's
still
sort
of
very
launch
phase
and
then
we'll
start
to
get
towards
like
the
mid
game
right
and
then
things
will
start
to
like
ossify,
for
real
and
and
the
things
that
we
have
done
during
the
pregame
during
the
first
year
will
start
to
really
be
with
some
small
tweaks
and
modifications.
This
will
be
how
things
get
done
forever
from
that
point
on.
A
A
I
think
I
may
have
said
it
before
right,
but
like
we're
completely
getting
rid
of
the
stances
and
pigeon
stands
in
Phoenix
and
a
lot
of
stuff,
because
that
just
all
gets
rolled
in
under
physical
resilience
and
and
yeah
just
I
mean
just
sort
of
the
definition
of
physically
resilient
real
assets,
and
so
I
mean
all
this
sort
of
logic
and
definitions.
It's
a
lot
more
refined.
A
A
No,
that
doesn't
remove
a
scope-
one,
that's
still
it's
still
12
and
it's
more
like
a
good.
It's
more
like
I
mean
the
stances
were
some
kind
of
I
guess
constitutional
level,
complexity
right,
which
has
been
rolling,
just
go
yeah
enough.
Now
again,
what
do
you
mean
yeah,
that
this
is
yeah
I
mean
well?
A
What's
the
Constitutional
boundaries
like
what's
the
sort
of
broad
definition,
with
the
broad
sort
of
mandate
of
the
scope
that
they're
related
to
us
or
associated
with,
or
will
sort
of
work
under
and
some
shaver
foam,
so
it
will
I
think
it
will
feel
it
would
be.
It
would
be
a
somewhat
natural
process
to
then
actually
start
to
probably
Define
it
and
formalize.
It.
A
B
A
Have
to
understand
that
game
right
so,
like
I
mean
like
delegates.
I
guess
are
the
ones
that
have
to
have
the
best
I
mean
well
actually
delegates
and,
and
maybe
something
like
the
arbitration
tribunal
right,
has
to
have
a
this
kind
of
understanding
of
the
Constitution,
which
then,
of
course,
I
mean
it
doesn't
mean
you
have
to
understand
details
of
other
stuff,
but
I
mean
that
that's
probably
the
closest
to
have
some
kind
of
intuition
of
what
the
hell's
going
on
with
the
whole
thing
right.
A
A
But
anyway,
so
the
way
I
mean
the
bases
are
rolling
out
and
ease
people
into
it.
Right
is,
of
course,
there's
going
to
be
this
whole
2023.
That's
going
to
be
the
kind
of
the
the
slow
ramping
up
year
right.
So
one
of
the
things
that
will
happen
in
2023
is
that
you
know
the
scope
I
mean
so
basically
the
scope
Frameworks
they
directly
replace
the
core
unit.
Mips
and
all
I
mean
they,
the
the
Constitution
and
the
scope.
A
A
So
we
budgets
will
happen
a
bit
differently
right,
because
now
all
budgets
are
controlled
from
one
MIP
and
then
and
then
in
the
end,
game
will
be
like
you'll
have
12
mips
and
each
of
them
controls
a
budget.
Each
focused
on
one
particular
thing,
but
then
it's
going
to
implement
it
side
by
side.
So
just
so,
when
we
put
in
place
the
Scopes
and
start
paying
out
budgets
through
them,
that
doesn't
mean
the
coin
admits:
stop
functioning
so
you'll
have
some
you'll
have
this
transition
period?
A
Where
you
have
like
sort
of
old
school
coordinates
alongside
end
game
councils
and
tribunals
and
end
game,
coordinates
and
they'll,
be
like
funded
through
different
mechanisms
and
and
it'll
all
you
know
so
so
the
kids
are
rolling
out.
Slowly
and
basically,
you
know
avoid
disturbing
critical
stuff
that
that
I
mean
you
know.
There's
certain
coordinates
where
we
don't
want
to
be
like.
Oh,
do
a
bunch
of
governance
stuff
or
your
funding
ends
right
for
for
Mission
critical
coordinates.
That
would
be
really
a
bad
way
to
do
it
right.
A
So
it's
going
to
be
so
quite
variable
right
and
then,
as
a
part
of
this
process,
I
mean
this.
The
whole
process,
as
it's
we've
been,
has
been
undergoing
for
a
long
time
now,
right
that
we
want
to
restructure
and
and
fix
the
budgets
and
try
to
cut
spending
and
make
things
more
efficient
and
then
also
spend
more
in
some
cases
right
where
we
want
to.
We
understand
the
Strategic
need
like,
like
the
delegate
conversation,
foreign.
A
Yeah
I
mean
so
the
transition
team
is
going
to
be
that's
quite
a
retro.
To
some
extent,
I
mean
it's
not
very
well
developed
yet,
but
I
mean
that'll
be
made
basically
official
once
we
implement
the
ecosystem
scope
framework
because,
basically
yeah,
like
the
ecosystem,
scope
is
kind
of
like
the
operations
or
even
some
kind
of
I
mean
it's
not
exactly.
A
That's
when
you
sort
of
get
into
delegates
and
sort
of
actual
control
right,
governance,
security,
so
they're
sort
of
like
I
mean
one
of
the
things
that
in
particular,
they
do
is
like
incubating
subtitles
in
the
long
run,
right
and
also
administering
also
the
random
stuff
and
then
also
like
dealing
with
like
drama
like
the
code
of
conduct
and
and
all
these
kind
of
things
right.
Like
all
of
that,
like
the
sort
of,
if
you
don't
know
where
it
goes,
It
goes
under
the
ecosystem
framework
and
that
also
just
automatically
means.
A
You
know
new
in-game,
specific
complexity
and
cross-collaboration
that
should
really
be
kept
to
minimum.
Rather,
the
focus
at
this
stage
should
be
cleaning
up.
There's
just
you
know
so
much
freaking
stuff.
That
maker
is
doing
today.
That's
taking
so
many
resources
that
isn't
needed.
Basically,
but
it's
it's
happening
because
of
a
lack
of
communication
and
sort
of
a
lack
of
coordination
right
and
then
that's
going
to
be
that's
kind
of
like
stage.
A
One
is
a
cleanup
and
clear
the
table
in
a
sense,
and
then
we
can
start
setting
up
these
these
new
interactional
mechanics
and
then
alongside
that,
there's
of
course,
the
sub
communities
themselves
right
where
at
least
for
like
the
first
two
quarters
at
least
right
then
I'll
be
on
I,
mean
obviously
running.
Every
single
subcommittee,
so
I'll
be
doing
like
three
colds
per
week
for
like
25
weeks
or
something,
and
then
I
expect
around
that
time.
We'll
start
to
see
like
more
I
mean
both
delegates
and
but
also
like
tribunals
and.
A
You
know
start
participating
and
be
like
okay.
I
can
sort
of
I
mean
the
whole
point
is
to
set
it
up
so
that
if
you're,
an
MK
holder
and
you
prove
you're
an
employer
and
you
join
a
subcommittee
you'll
be
true-
I
mean
it's
kind
of
like
being
on
the
it's
kind
of
like
being
the
board
right
and
then
getting
presentable
like
these
other
options.
This
is
all
the
data.
This
is
data
here.
Here's
the
sort
of
presentation
you're
trying
to
really
make
it
simple
make
it.
A
You
know
the
executive
summary
right
and
then
what's
the
what's
the
decision
of
the
the
the
subcommittee
right
in
terms
of
what
should
we
do
with
the
scope
framework,
which
is
what
I
always
boils
down
to
and
then
independent
imperialists
are
then
going
to
be
like
the
ones
that
have
to
make
those
calls
in
the
end
as
long
as
they're
constitutional
right?
So
then,
there's
like
these
checks
in
place
to
ensure
some
Rando
can't
go
in
and
try
to
do
something
unconstitutional
with
a
for
the
DVC.