►
From YouTube: Montgomery City Planning Commission (1/28/21)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
Plats
rezonings,
revised
master
plans,
street
renamings
and
text
amendments
require
a
public
hearing
and
once
the
public
hearing
is
completed,
planning
commission
members
would
deliberate
and
render
their
decision
planning.
Commission
members
with
a
personal
or
financial
interest
in
any
petitioner's
request
are
required
to
recuse
themselves.
A
The
members
of
the
planning
commission
are
frank
cook
chairman
ann
clemens,
vice
chairman
buddy,
hardwick,
cruz,
reeves,
reginald,
hawkins,
who's,
absent
reggie,
mantooth,
reggie
dunn,
james
reed
and
mr
kippy
tate,
the
members
of
the
planning
control
staff.
Are,
I
don't
see
tommy
tyson
or
james
center
tanya,
ingram
and
jovan
hines
recording
secretaries,
members
and
petitioners
are
requested
to
please
speak
directly
into
the
microphone.
A
The
minutes
are
recorded
for
legal
purposes,
and
this
is
the
only
way
to
accurately
pick
up
audio
tonight.
We
have
eight
members
present
and
it
takes
five
votes
to
pass
a
motion
because
of
the
number
of
board
members
present.
If
you
wish
to
delay
your
request,
please
let
us
know
when
your
request
is
announced.
Mr
chairman,.
D
C
D
E
Yes,
sir,
I'm
speaking
on
behalf
of
my
elderly
uncle
who
was
living
in
new
york
and
we
were
all
born
on
the
air
property
at
321
williams
drive.
E
He
is
moved
back
down
there
and
he
wants
to
get
a
a
trailer
and
put
on
the
land,
and
I
do
understand
that
we
can't
get
a
more
than
one
trailer
at
this
point
to
force
for
to
put
on
the
land.
So
and
that's
all
we
were
looking
for
anyway.
E
He
moved
back
home
and
and
want
to
just
live
there,
he's
71
and
would
like
to
just
you
know,
live
out
his
days
on
land
now
and
basically
that's
it.
We've
already
had
some
work
done.
We
had
the
surveyor
and
come
out
and
they
surveyed
the
land
and
everything,
and
so
whatever
else
we
need
to
do,
we
want
to
know
what
that
is
and,
like
I
said,
it's
just
him
and
his
son,
who
is
21
they'll,
be
living
in
the
trailer.
E
We
already
have
one
trailer
on
the
land
and
a
house
that
had
caught
fire.
It
needs
to
be
fixed.
I
don't
know
if
they're
gonna
fix
that
up
or
take
it
down,
but
we're
not
planning
on
like
putting
multiple
trailers.
There.
E
There's
one
mobile
home:
that's
been
there
for
years
and
years:
okay,
so
he's
that
that
belongs
to
my
other
elderly
uncle.
So
he
wants
to
get
one
and
put
there
for
him
and
his
son.
Okay.
F
The
trailer
is
it
on
the
property
you're
trying
to
rezone,
or
is
that
is
that
right?
Is
that
the
trailer?
This
looks
like
to
the
west
of
the
piece
of
property.
E
The
trailer
that
he
he's
planning
on
he's
planning
on
getting
a
trailer.
If
you
all
approve
he,
the
trailer
is
not
there
yet,
but
I
have
been
speaking
to
settlers
of
trailers.
You
know
companies,
so
you
know
we're
just
waiting
to
see
what
you
guys
say.
E
So
what
it
is
is
there's
a
trailer
on
the
property
next
to
the
house,
the
house,
the
house
either
will
be
removed
or
it'll
be
in
the
middle
of
of,
but
they
I
think
my
uncle
was
planning
on
removing
the
house
and
put
in
the
trailer
where
the
house
is
because
the
house
caught
a
fire
and
it's
condemned
now.
E
G
Yes,
sir,
the,
where
is
that
existing
trailer
now
where's
it
located
on
the
line.
E
The
to
the
right
of
it
like
downtown
to
the
right,
we
don't
we
don't
know
how
many
you
require
them
to
be
a
part
but,
like
I
said
right
now
to
the
right
of
that
trailer.
E
G
D
G
G
E
Oh,
since
I
was
young,
so
I'm
gonna
say.
E
E
B
B
B
A
D
E
Uncle
my
uncle
helped
raise
me
and
I've
been
around
him
all
my
life,
and
I
I
I
suggested
that
he
move
home
and
get
out
of
new
york,
because
I
just
want
to
see
him
happy
and
I
don't
think
that
he
should
be
paying
rent
when
he
could
just
be
in
his
own
house.
B
F
To
put
a
second
trailer
on
there,
yes,
sir,
but
you're
saying
that
there
will
be
no
more
trailers
on
this
other
than
those
two.
Am
I
understanding
that
correctly.
E
F
That's
your
your
aunt
you're
you're
answering
the
question
kind
of
kind
of
what
what
I
was
foreseeing
happening
and
that's
the
reason
I
wanted
to
know.
If,
in
fact,
it
was
only
going
to
be
the
two,
then
what
we'd
say
is
if
it
was
approved
that
we'd
do
it
for
just
two
two
trailers
but
yeah.
F
C
A
minute
miss
davis.
The
reason
why
we
suggested
ag
one
is
because
for
every
mobile
home
that
she
wants
to
put
on,
there
has
to
go
to
the
board
of
adjustment
for
approval.
F
C
They
normally
look
at
the
size
of
the
lot
how
many's
are
rated
there.
Currently,
there
really
is
no
defined
criteria.
Question
is.
E
Well,
yeah,
that's
that's
our
next
thing
that
we
wanted
to
get
done.
I
was
calling
some
companies
to
get
the
pricing
of
that
and
I
found
a
couple
of
companies
that
have
some
good
pricing
and,
if
you
guys
approve,
then
that
that
that
will
be
done
right
away.
B
B
C
C
I
B
B
B
D
D
B
B
Anyone
from
the
audience
wish
to
address
this
item.
Yes,
ma'am
hope
you
you're
not
coming
forward.
Okay,
no
problem
hearing
none!
This
is
a
plot
requires
a
vote.
Is
there
a
motion?
D
C
D
C
B
B
D
G
I
B
B
B
I'm
sorry
I
mean
the
wrong
one,
I'm
sorry,
seven
seven!
I
missed
it,
I'm
with
the
wrong
thing.
I'm
sorry
all
right!
There's
no
bill
in
here.
Forget
that
no
one
are
you
requesting
me
all
right,
any
other
question
of
the
planning
commission
members,
if
not
anyone
the
audience
wish
to
address
this
item.
I
We
actually
just
finished
plat
11,
which
connects
you
actually
come
out
of
flight
11
into
plat
10
we've
had
no
complaints
and
we're
I
mean
those
houses
are
selling
as
fast
as
we
can
build
them.
But
have
you
talked
to
them
talk
about
what's
going
on
yeah
when
they
purchase
the
home?
They
know
that
that's
a
plaque!
That's
going
to
be
developed,
they're
aware.
B
C
D
Do
pep
a
favor,
can
we
table
it
to
the
next
event.
J
Good
evening,
I'm
kenneth
white
jr.
This
first
item
is
like,
like
tanya,
said
it's
the
first
baptist
church
in
the
parking
lot
and
the
building
to
the
north.
There
we're
simply
moving
an
interior
light
line
to
the
south
to
include
there's
a
wall
that
separates
these
two
parcels,
we're
going
to
put
the
wall
solely
on
the
northern
track.
That's
that's
the
point
of
this
replay.
J
B
B
C
J
What
is
still
him?
Football
sorry
steal
this
one,
okay,
this
this
flat.
It
was
originally
just
one
lot
that
lot
12
and
then
the
intent
of
that
watch
was
always
to
put
some
attached
products
on
that
lot
and
they're
gonna
sell
those.
So
we
need
we
need
to
divide
those
into
individual
lots.
They're
going
to
still
must
be
simple,
so
we
need
to
divide
that
partial
12
into
that
configuration
there'll
be
seven
units
on
that
kind
of
square.
J
The
reason
we
included
the
bigger
parcel
to
the
north
that's
lot
24,
because
it
encompassed
a
little
sliver
to
the
north
and
south.
You
see
where
it
says
old
lot
line
right.
There
there's
a
little
sliver
of
land,
which
was
a
part
of
lot
24.
So
that's
why
we
included
a
lot
24
for
the
sole
purpose.
Is
we
took
some
acres
out
of
that.
J
Yeah
that
that
that
is
a
non-buildable
lot,
there's
an
alley
that
goes
in
between
from
mercer
street
to
the
alley
behind
that.
So
tony,
you
kind
of
said
that
the
warrant
would
be
the
proper
thing
to
do
on
that.
So
it's
really
there's
a
non-buildable
lot.
It
just
allows
it.
I
guess
I
guess
in
the
smart
code
I
think
there's
an
18
foot,
minimum
width
right
and
that's
12
foot.
So
it's
really.
It
just
accommodates
a
road.
So
there's
no
there's
a
non-billable
watch.
G
J
J
Yeah,
you
see
the
aerial
yeah,
I
got
it
now.
You
see
it
yeah,
that's
the
existing
road,
assisting
connection
between
mercer
and
that
back
alley.
J
Thanks
tonya,
this
is
simple
triangular
piece
of
land
and
the
owner
owns
both
tracks
of
land.
There's
two
parcels
now
and
we're
simply
re-plating
it
to
have
equal
acreage
for
both
parcels.
J
I
don't
it's
mighty
low
it
I
haven't
checked.
I
don't
think
it
is
because
it's
not
shown.
I
think
I
did
look
at
that.
It's
close
miss
reeves.
I
don't
think
of
this
flood
plain
right
now.
A
Foreign,
I'm
sorry,
it
says:
siblings,
wrote
in
caudill
street
r65,
residential
and
you're
requesting
replating.
J
Yes,
there's
an
existing
house
on
the
the
smaller
track
on
the
corner
there,
but
he
wanted
to
include
a
little
bit
more
acreage
for
his
house.
You
see
the
area
right
there
and
he
owns
the
whole
property.
He
just
wanted
to
to
create
a
replay
to
have
similar
acreage
for
both
parcels
of
land.
A
A
A
A
Going
I
can't
really
see,
I
can't
really
see
on
what
it
looks
like
I'm.
A
D
No,
that's
not
the
area
that
he
helped
for
there's
some
other
people
doing
some
other
stuff.
Okay,.
J
G
B
D
C
J
Thank
you.
This
is
a
track
of
land
zone
pud,
and
I
think
y'all
heard
this-
the
last
planning
commission
to
do
a
revised
pud
to
to
allow
these
town
homes
and
these
50-foot
lots
that
are
planned
here.
This
is
just
the
this
is
the
this.
Is
the
master
plan
that
the
companies
that
reason
requests
the
change
of
use?
I
guess
it's
changing
use
of
what
the.
B
J
My
developer
has
met,
I
think,
wind
lakes
to
the
east.
There
yeah
that's
right,
it's
the
you
all
heard
the
rezoning.
I
guess
the
rezoning
request
right.
Sorry,
it's
not
reasonable.
It's
a
rezoning,
but
it's
a
use,
change
right,
put
to
a
poet,
but
the
use
is
different.
Last
that's.
J
J
Yeah
jeff,
my
client
did
meet
with
what,
when
lakes
to
the
east
and
they
they
had
no
confidence
that
was
before
last
month's
meeting,
yeah.
Okay,.
J
G
B
B
H
I'm
here
as
judy
jones
playing
one
of
my
questions
I
had
I
saw
the
write-up
today
and
my
concern:
is
we
work
out
there
and
right
there
to
the
west
right
on
the
corner
of
bear
hill,
there's
going
to
be
a
hotel,
it's
already
and
and
right
there
behind
right
above
that,
next
to
our
office,
is
the
the
new
auto
owners
new
facility?
That's
going
to
be
a
regional
facility.
H
My
problem
is
what
about.
I
noticed
that
traffic
didn't
have
any
comments,
but
you
can't
hardly
get
out
of
there
right
now,
and
so
I
just
don't
know,
and
then
you
get
all
these
houses
in
there.
That's
my
concern
is
it's
already
a
nightmare
because
everybody
cuts
through
there
to
get
out
so
has
was
that
addressed
by
anybody
tanya
about
a
traffic
light.
G
B
G
I
said
after
looking
at
this
when
I
got
my
packet,
I
was
under
the
same.
I
had
the
same
concern
that
you
just
expressed
about
the
volume
of
traffic
that
would
be
going
on
to
east
chase
lane
based
on
this
development,
and
I
don't
know
if
you
got
the
answer
to
your
question
or
not
about
it.
H
G
J
J
Did
they
have
any
comments?
No
traffic,
didn't
you
know
the
the
prior
use
was
office,
institutional,
which
probably
is
very
similar
in
traffic
with
what
I'm
proposing
right
now.
So
it's
you
could
build
a
pretty
good
facility
there
in
the
use.
That
was
that
we've
tried
to
rezone
from
so
you
know
it
also
have
two
means
of
egress
towards
berry
hill
and
obviously
to
the
east
as
well.
J
Also,
this
is
this:
is
a
private
right-of-way,
it's
going
to
be
gated
so
that
this
can
you
know
if
that
means
anything
to
you,
but
it's
not
a
public
road.
G
J
G
J
Know
there's
a
light
on
the
right
side.
You
know
right
now,
right
and
ladies
told
me:
they
had.
He
had
a
letter
from
when
lake
saying
they
didn't
have
any
comments
on
this
result,
yeah.
Well,
I
think
they
would
be
from
office
institutional
to
a
residential
product,
that's
very
similar
to
what
they
have
right
now,
all
right.
B
J
Ahead,
this
is
the
preliminary
flat
for
the
subdivision,
basically
placing
the
lots
where
I
proposed
and
the
streets
were
proposed.
D
It
says
a
street
starts
at
street
c.
That's
not
what
the
map
shows.
C
It
could
be
an
error.
Let
me
see.
D
Shows
you're
starting
at
east
chase
lane.