►
From YouTube: Montgomery City Planning Commission (12/10/20)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
To
come
forward
to
the
microphone
and
express
their
opinion,
each
side
will
have
a
total
of
10
minutes
to
speak.
Plats
rezonings,
revised
master
plans,
street
renamings
and
text
amendments
require
a
public
hearing
and
once
the
public
hearing
is
completed,
planning
commission
members
will
deliberate
and
render
their
decision
planning.
Commission
members
with
a
personal
or
financial
interest
in
any
petitioner's
request
are
required
to
recuse
themselves
correction.
We
have
eight
members
present.
A
The
members
of
the
planning
commission
are
mr
frank
cook,
chairman
ann
clements,
vice
chairman,
mr
buddy
hardwick,
mr
cruz
reeves,
mr
reginald
hawkins,
mr
reg
man
tooth
is
absent.
It's
reggie
dunn,
mr
james
reed
and
mr
kippy.
Tate,
the
members
of
the
planning
control
staff
are
tommy
tyson
james
center
tanya,
ingram,
recording
secretary
members
and
petitioners
are
requested
to
please
speak
directly
into
the
microphone.
A
The
minutes
are
recorded
for
legal
purposes,
and
this
is
the
only
way
to
accurately
pick
up
audio
tonight.
We
have
eight
members
and
it
takes
five
votes
to
pass
a
motion
because
of
the
number
of
board
members
present.
If
you
wish
to
delay
your
request,
please
let
us
know
when
your
request
is
announced.
B
B
D
E
But
we
have,
like,
I
say
plenty
of
acreage
for
anything
needed
in
the
usage
of
the
church.
So
we
appreciate
your
approval,
we'll
be
going
to
the
board
of
adjustments
for
the
master
plan
for
the
church.
F
D
G
F
I
I
So
what
he
would
like
to
try
to
do
is
he's
asking
the
planning
commission
to
allow
him
to
combine
it
into
one
lot,
so
he
might
use
that
for
some
kind
of
commercial
development,
maybe
a
fresh
garden
area,
I'm
not
a
fresh
guy.
I
mean
a
market.
I
I
Well,
is
it
not
zone
four
four.
C
I
No,
no,
what
he's
trying
to
do
now
is
just
create
one
lot
instead
of
having
four
or
parts
of
four
and
parts
of
two
others,
that's
all
he's
requesting
at
this
time.
Oh
mr.
K
Chairman,
if
you
don't
mind,
I
got
a
call
about
this
item
this
morning,
and
that
was
the
question:
was
it
going
to
be
rezoned
or
was
it
going
to
be
used
as
a
residential
property
because
it
says
duplex,
but
with
the
combining
of
the
lots
one
of
the
citizens,
that
called
me
was
wondering
if
it
was
going
to
be
something
other
than
that?
K
F
I
F
I
B
F
F
Six
point
emerson
street,
montgomery:
okay,
as
a
member
of
the
neighborhood
of
that
area
and
a
representative,
we
we
don't
mind
it
being
combined
for
residential,
but
we
oppose
commercial.
H
We
have
addressed
the
fact
that
what
could
happen
it
he
could
come
back
in
here
and
try
to
rezone
it
and
not
get
it
rezoned
understood.
So
so
you
know
they're
here
to
get
it
get
it
planted
and
if
they're
that's
that's
a
real
roll
of
the
dice
when
you're
gonna
replat
this
and
then
and
then
hope,
you're
gonna
get
rezoned.
H
So
that
but
that's
not
our
business,
that's
that's
their
business
and
I
think
mr
pierce
has
made
it
very
clear
that
that's
what
they
want
to
do
and
I
think
you
made
it
very
clear
and
I
think
you've
done
a
good
job
explaining
the
fact
that
hey
guys,
I'm
just
telling
you
we
don't
want
commercial
yeah.
So.
K
I
I
F
C
So,
mr
chairman,
are,
we
are
we?
Are
we
re-zoning.
I
C
B
D
F
F
C
F
F
B
F
D
D
The
next
item
is
by
flowers
and
white
engineering
on
behalf
of
providence
partners.
Llc
requesting
approval
of
a
revised
master
plan
to
allow
townhouses
and
single-family
residential,
whereas
office
uses
approved,
is
some
24
acres
on
the
south
side
of
east
chase
lane
400
feet:
east
of
berry
hill
road
in
a
tud
district.
J
Thank
you
miss
tyson,
I'm
kenneth
white,
jr,
flowers
of
white
engineering,
I'm
representing
providence
partner
at
llc.
As
you
see
from
that
graphic
there,
this
parcel
lands
approximately
21
acres,
south
of
barrie
hill
right
there.
It's
currently
a
flood
zoning.
J
It's
currently
classified
as
an
office
use
in
the
pud
zoning
right
now
and
we
are
proposing
to
reclassify
that
to
residential
the
majority
of
the
you
have
the
one
down.
J
Basically,
single
family
homes,
we
propose
69
lots
in
town
houses
attached
products
on
the
western
side
of
that
parcel,
I
can
entertain
any
questions
should
y'all
have
any
well
also,
I'm
gonna
pass
this
out
real,
quick.
The
the
proposed
development
is
proposed
to
be
called
grantham
and
our
my
developer
has
got
some
marketing.
J
Again,
it's
kind
of
an
upscale
really
nice
development
that
we're
proposing
for
this
area
again:
single
family
lots
and
town
home
products
on
the
west
side
of
that
property.
F
C
F
D
J
J
It's
currently
zoned
ag
1
and
I'm
representing
lane
jones
llc
and
we're
proposing
to
rezone
that
to
an
r50
single
family
dwellings.
C
J
Sure,
okay,
we
I
received
an
email
from
a
mr
jones,
representing
a
mr
jenkins
to
the
south
yeah
there's
an
existing
lake.
As
you
see
on
the
southwest
corner
of
the
property
right
there.
It's
currently
has
a
a
dam
on
the
back
side,
as
well
as
a
out
structure
with
a
pipe.
You
know
we're
going
to
keep
the
lake
the
the
drainage
goes
that
direction
now.
So
you
know
by
law
we
can't
increase
the
runoff
from
our
proposed
development.
J
So
you
know
when
we,
when
we
propose
a
preliminary
plant,
should
just
be
successful
in
the
rezoning
we
were
we're
going
to.
You
know.
You
know,
help
that
situation
by
probably
redoing
the
tawn
outlet
structure
and
modifying
the
dam
a
little
bit,
so
they
can
handle
that
water
more
efficiently.
So
I
talked
to
mr
jones
and
sent
him
an
email
as
well
had
a
good
conversation
with
him.
So
yeah,
I'm
well
aware
of
the
drainage
going
that
direction
in
our
design
of
our
construction
plans
we'll
handle
that.
H
H
You've
got
thank
you,
so
it's
I'm
excited.
J
Too,
did
you
well,
it's
we've
talked
about
that
mr
reeves.
It's
full
access
on
both
those
properties,
but
I
can't
I've
talked
to
the
state
already
and
they've
recommended
me
having
that,
that's
a
they
recommend
using
that
cross
access
that
I
have
right
there.
J
J
Commission,
yes,
mr
reed,
I
talked
to
his
his
attorney
that
represented
him
yeah.
I
I
got
the
tonya
afforded
me,
the
email
that
I
guess
you
all
have,
and
I
talked
to
him
last
week
and
I
fought
up,
had
a
good
conversation
with
mr
jones
and
I
followed
up
with
the
email
as
well.
J
K
A
quick
question:
it
says
that
the
2040
comprehensive
plan
is
incorrect
in
this
area
and
it's
going
to
be
revised
and
we
get
a
chance
to
see
what
those
revisions
are
going
to
prove
it.
Since
we
approved
the
initial
plan.
L
The
short
answer
is
yes,
we
are
in
the
process
of
you
know,
as
these
issues
come
up
spot
checking,
and
so
so,
when
we
run
into
issues
like
this
one
right
here
where
it
says,
potential
open
space,
but
you
got
residential
directly
across
the
street
from
it
that
that
requires
in
a
an
adjustment
or
correction.
So
we're
as
we
complete
comprehensively
all
of
the
corrections
we'll
bring
out
we'll
bring
the
the
future
land
use
map
back
to
you
before
and.
L
That
done
robert,
give
us
probably
another
two
months
to
do
that.
All
right.
L
L
It's
actually
saying
that
this
is
potential
open
space
and
it
says
consider
potential
open
space
is
undeveloped,
land
that
is
not
currently
preserved,
but
should
be
considered
for
conservation.
These
areas
often
exhibit
potential
for
flooding
or
deemed
inappropriate
for
development
due
to
significant
physical,
physical
or
environmental
limitations,
and
that's
not
the
case
here.
This
is
not
any
kind
of
a
flood
zone
or
anything
like
that,
and
so
this
wouldn't
be
a
location
that
has
any
limits
on
development,
with
the
exception
of
the
pond,
that's
to
the
down
at
the
very
bottom.
So.
K
L
Yes,
sir,
yes,
sir,
and
and
that's
why
it's
incorrect
and
we
had
an
issue
up
in
north
pass
area
of
north
montgomery,
where
I
can't
think
of
the
name
of
the
neighborhood
off
of
yeah
madison
park.
L
You
know
same
same
similar
situation
where,
where
it
was
characterized
as
potential
open
space
but
madison
park
is,
is
in
actuality,
a
residential
neighborhood
and
there
was
a
person
that
came
in
for
residential
development.
So
we
put
the
same
similar
comment
in
that
regard.
So
when
we
you
know,
we
evaluate
each
proposal
on
a
case-by-case
basis,
and
you
know,
wherever
we
see
an
issue,
that's
not
that's
incorrect.