►
From YouTube: Enhancing Quality in Early Learning
Description
MDRC’s Dr. Michelle Maier provides an overview of her research in early learning educator quality and ways to enhance it through professional learning and advancement opportunities.
Explore the full playlist:
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLrLes3ojwahls8aD_l5FT_kdyNDMb32mS
Visit NCSL.org for more information on this series:
https://bit.ly/2W9Vo1p
A
All
right,
hi
everyone
thanks
so
much
for
having
me,
as
patrick
said,
I'm
going
to
be
talking
a
little
bit
about
quality
and
early
care
and
education
and
what
we
can
do
to
enhance
that
quality.
So
a
little
background
sounds
like
you.
A
I've
already
maybe
talked
about
this,
but
decades
of
research
have
shown
that
children
who
attend
high
quality,
early
care
and
education
programs
arrive
at
kindergarten
better
prepared
to
learn
than
their
peers,
who
do
not
have
access
to
those
high
quality,
early
learning
experiences,
and
that
suggests
that
investments
in
early
childhood
really
should
aim
broadly
to
focus
on
two
things:
ensuring
equitable
access
to
early
care
and
education,
but
also
thinking
really
hard
about
that
quality
piece.
But
we
know
that
quality
really
varies
both
within
and
across
states.
A
So
the
question
is:
how
might
we
enhance
quality
across
the
board?
And
this
early
learning
workforce
really
plays
a
key
role
in
this,
because
these
are
the
individuals
that
are
providing
the
learning
environments
that
will
promote
successful
outcomes
for
children
and
when.
B
A
About
workforce,
you
know,
of
course
it's
about
the
teachers,
the
assistant
teachers,
the
aides,
the
folks
that
are
directly
interacting
with
kids,
but
also
thinking
about
the
administrators
and
the
directors,
the
education
coordinators,
coaches,
etc,
who
are
also
playing
this
supporting
role
for
those
teachers?
So
what
I'll
talk
a
little
bit
about?
Is
you
know?
How
can
we
define
and
measure
quality
and
then
what?
So?
What
do
we
know
about
how
to
enhance
it?
A
So,
in
terms
of
quality,
I
think
all
of
us
are
probably
wanting
all
children
to
be
able
to
experience
safe,
stable,
nurturing,
respectful,
inclusive
and
educational
environments
that
really
try
to
promote
growth
and
development
in
all
areas
of
learning,
for
all
kids,
but
operationalizing
that,
in
terms
of
our
definitions
of
quality
and
the
measures
that
we
use
is
rather
a
challenging
thing.
A
A
We
also
have
been
thinking
about
quality
in
terms
of
different
dimensions,
and
so
I'm
going
to
present
one
way
of
thinking
about
quality
or
three
dimensions
of
quality
that
we've
been
looking
at
in
mdrc,
so
we
could
think
of
that
as
a
base.
We
want
to
lay
a
foundation
of
structural
quality,
and
it's
upon
this
kind
of
all
other
aspects
of
quality
can
build,
and
here
we're
thinking
about
the
structural
or
physical
aspects
of
how
a
program
or
classrooms
are
designed
and
configured.
A
This
tends
to
be
where
you're
sort
of
things
that
can
be
regulated
fall
into
place.
Like
your
teacher
child
ratio,
some
safety
standards,
you
can
also
think
about
the
curriculum
being
used
here,
the
materials
in
the
classroom,
how
the
furniture
is
set
up,
etc.
Another
dimension
of
quality,
I'm
going
to
call
interactional
quality.
The
field
I
think,
is
tend
to
talk
about
this
as
process
quality,
so
that
term
might
be
more
familiar
to
you.
This
is
about
with
the
relationships,
the
interactions
that
occur
between
teachers
and
children
or
among
children
within
the
classroom.
A
It's
about
how
positive
that
climate
might
be
how
fun
it
is.
The
overall
kind
of
classroom,
management
and
organization,
the
extent
to
it
teachers
are
really
responsive
and
sensitive
to
children's
needs.
A
A
third
dimension,
I'm
going
to
call
instructional
quality,
and
this
is
what
is
being
taught
in
the
classroom
and
then
how
is
it
being
taught?
And
here
I
I've
been
thinking
about
this
as
kind
of
what
content
is
being
provided
to
kids.
So
are
they
talking
about
ocean
animals
or
what
it
means
to
be
a
community
member
or
what
is
a
living
being?
What
is
a
living
thing?
Also,
here's!
You
know
where
the
skills
remains
they're
being
focused
on.
Is
it
math
science,
social,
emotional,
learning,
literacy,
etc?
A
We
also
think
about
activity
settings,
and
this
is
you
know
how
much
time
is
being
spent
in
whole
group
or
small
group
or
transition,
and
then
also
instructional
practices
can
fall
into
this
category.
So
what
kinds
of
questions
are
teachers
asking?
Are
they
individualizing
instruction,
and
so
these
three
dimensions,
I
think,
have
been
talked
about
a
lot,
but
it's
also
important
to
think
about
kind
of
back
up
to
that
program
level.
What
is
the
program
support
structure
so
with
the
leadership?
How
effective
are
they
at
supporting
teachers
and
what
are
their?
A
So
there
are
many
measures
out
there
for
looking
at
quality.
They
differ
in
terms
of
what
aspects
or
dimensions
of
quality
they
focus
on,
how
deeply
they
focus
on
them
and
who
they
might
be
focusing
on,
so
they
might
be
focusing
on
the
program
versus
the
classroom
or
at
a
child
level,
or
they
could
be
focusing
on.
You
know,
home-based
setting
versus
the
center-based
setting
the
most
commonly
used
measures
are
the
classroom
assessment
scoring
system
the
class
or
the
environmental
rating
scales.
But
there
are
many
other
measures
out
there
I
would
say.
A
Unfortunately,
there
is
no
one
measure
of
quality,
that's
sort
of
like
the
home
hit
run.
That
will
work
for
every
single
circumstance
and
I
don't
think
we're
ever
going
to
get
there
as
it
feels.
And
so,
when
you
think
about
measure
selection,
you,
it
should
be
determined
based
on
what
your
definition
of
quality
is
and
what's
your
goal,
your
purpose
of
measuring
quality
and
what
are
the
things
that
you
care
about?
What
dimensions
you're
interested
in
and
that
will
help
determine
which
measure
might
be
the
best
for
your
particular
circumstance.
A
So
what
do
we
know
about
enhancing
quality
and
one
very
promising
strategy
that
I
want
to
talk
about?
Is
thinking
about
professional
development
or
the
ongoing
professional
learning
experiences
that
we
provide
the
workforce
once
they're
on
the
job
and
there's
several
forms
that
this
can
partake
in
training
and
coaching,
and
certainly,
I
think,
once
we
think
about
the
most.
But
I
also
want
to
think
about
common
planning
or
prep
time.
This
is
really
for
teachers
or
professional
learning
communities.
A
I'm
going
to
talk
about
these
things
from
like
a
teacher
perspective,
but
I
do
want
you
to
really
think
about
ongoing
professional
learning
for
the
other
members
of
the
workforce,
like
your
directors
and
education,
coordinators,
coaches,
etc.
That
this
is
very
important
to
be
thinking
about
the
experiences
that
we
provide
them
as
well.
A
C
A
Well,
excellent
job
group:
for
the
first
question,
it
is
teacher
trading
combined
with
coaching,
so
it
is
sort
of
that
combo
with
training
and
coaching
around
a
particular
topic.
That's
going
to
improvement
and
teacher
skills
and
practice,
and
when
I
talk
about
coaching,
it
really
is
sort
of
two-fold
it's
about
observing
teachers
within
the
classroom,
implementing
doing
their
work
and
then
also
providing
regular
opportunities
for
them
to
reflect
on
what's
going
on
and
how
that's
working
and
receiving
feedback
from
their
coaches.
A
The
idea
here
is
that
coaching
can
really
help
teachers
to
translate
the
knowledge
and
skills
that
they
learned
in
training
into
the
real
world
context,
because
every
classroom
is
going
to
be
different
and
so
doing
it
in
your
real
context
is
what
makes
the
bone
sense.
There
is
some
evidence
suggesting
that
training
alone
is
just
less
effective.
A
So
the
second
goal
was,
if
you're,
focusing
on
a
particular
skill
domain
in
terms
of
training
and
coaching
which
are
the
following,
as
it's
been
shown
to
do,
it
looks
like
most
of
you
picked
all
of
the
above,
and
that
was
the
correct
answer
that
we
have
seen
research.
That
would
show
that
this
is
linked
with
all
these
good
things.
Just
increased
use
of
instructional
practices
within
that
targeted
domain
more
time
and
whatever
that
skill
domain
is
and
also
improvements
in
just
global
classroom
quality.
A
Now
I
would
argue
that
the
easiest
way
to
try
to
focus
training
in
coaching
and
to
get
to
this
focus
on
a
particular
skill
domain
is
to
do
it
around
evidence-based,
domain-specific
curriculum.
A
A
lot
of
research
on
them,
but
they
are
promising
methods
and
a
study
that
we
did
of
pre-k
teachers
in
new
york
city.
We
found
that
those
who
had
more
common
planning
time
were
observed,
implementing
fewer
whole
group
activities
and
more
small
group
activities,
and
I
think
that's
really
interesting,
because
small
group
is
a
time
where
there's
just
a
teacher
with
just
a
few
kids
and
it
allows
for
instruction
that's
more
tailored
to
individual
children's
needs.
A
A
So,
given
this,
what
are
some
practical
steps
for
improving
quality?
The
first
is
thinking
about
the
curriculum
that's
being
used.
We
do
want
ones
that
are
that
have
proven
track
records
that
focus
on
key
learning
domains
and
but
the
proven
track
record.
A
The
second
piece
is
supporting
educators
through
robust
ongoing
professional
learning
opportunities
like
those
that
I
just
described,
and
then
the
third
piece
is
collecting
data
and
then
creating
metrics
and
monitoring
them
to
inform
continuous
quality
improvement.
The
idea
here
is,
if
you're,
putting
in
a
new
curriculum,
you
want
to
know
what
are
the
sticking
points
what's
working?
What's
not
working
are
teachers
implementing
it
or
not,
and
then
using
that
information
to
kind
of
go
back
to
the
drawing
board
and
try
to
move
away
those
barriers
that
are
challenges
for
teachers.
A
So
what
should
ongoing
professional
learning
opportunities?
Look
like
there's
a
couple
of
characteristics
that
have
shown
to
be
pretty
important
versus
sustain
over
time
and
that's
the
sustained
within
a
school
year,
but
also
across
multiple
school
years.
Just
that
kind
of
one
I
think
most
of
us
are
in
the
zone
where
we
know
that
one
kind
of
workshop
at
one
point
in
time
is
not
going
to
be
sufficient.
A
A
These
professional
learning
opportunities
should
also
allow
for
active,
hands-on
learning.
We
do
a
lot
of
thinking
about
what
a
kids
need,
but
when
you're
thinking
about
professional
development,
you
want
to
think
about
what's
best
for
adults
and
how
do
they
learn
best
and
provide
it
in
that
way,
they
need
to
be
aligned
with
relevant
education
standards,
program
expectations
and
the
particular
program
context,
and
so
this
is
so
that
you
don't
get
mixed
messaging
to
folks
and
that
you
overburden
teachers
with
lots
of
conflicting
information.
A
We
want
them
to
encourage
regular
collaboration
with
colleagues
and
to
include
all
relevant
staff.
I
think
we've
learned
in
trying
to
put
in
place
different
curricula
that,
if
you
just
train
and
coach
lead
teachers,
but
don't
include
the
other
teachers
in
the
classroom,
you're
kind
of
missing
the
boat
a
bit,
because
then
you
know
that
you
can't
really
get
a
full
experience
there
and
if
you
also
don't
include
directors,
educational
coordinators,
other
folks
that
are
supporting
teachers,
they're
not
going
to
be
able
to
provide
the
support
that
everyone
needs.
A
A
So,
in
conclusion,
a
sustained
investment
in
in
high
quality,
ongoing
professional
learning
can
help
support
an
early
childhood
workforce
to
be
well
equipped
to
create
these
high
quality
learning
experiences
that
we
all
want
to
see
that
ultimately
meet
the
developmental
needs
of
young
children
from
all
backgrounds.