►
From YouTube: 4/21/2021 - Assembly Committee on Government Affairs
Description
For agenda and additional meeting information: https://www.leg.state.nv.us/App/Calendar/A/
Videos of archived meetings are made available as a courtesy of the Nevada Legislature.
The videos are part of an ongoing effort to keep the public informed of and involved in the legislative process.
All videos are intended for personal use and are not intended for use in commercial ventures or political campaigns.
Closed Captioning is Auto-Generated and is not an official representation of what is being spoken.
A
A
Present,
thank
you,
madam
secretary.
Please
mark
assemblyman
ellison
has
absent
excuse
and
should
he
make
his
way
into
the
meeting?
If
you
could
please
mark
him
as
present
all
other
members
are
present,
we
have
a
quorum
good
morning,
everybody
and
welcome
to
our
second
meeting
in
person.
I
know
everybody's
incredibly
excited
about
that.
A
A
I
want
to
remind
those
of
you
who
are
either
present
here
good
morning,
sir,
and
for
those
of
you
following
us.
Virtually
that
sometimes
you'll
see
us
looking
down
or
at
our
screen.
Don't
take
that
assignment
disrespect.
A
Those
of
you
wishing
to
speak
during
public
comment
we'll
be
doing
that
at
the
conclusion
of
today's
meeting
and,
lastly,
members
just
want
to
remind
you:
should
you
have
any
questions
feel
free
to
either
get
my
attention
vice
chair's
attention
or
mr
mcdonald
detention
and
we'll
make
sure
we
add
you
to
the
queue
of
questions
and
with
that
on
the
agenda
today
we
have
senate
bill
14
and
senate
bill
15.
A
C
We
worked
on
this
bill
over
the
last
biennium
to
see
where
we
could
clean
up
and
make
some
some
ease.
Some
bureaucratic
processes
and
some
of
those
items
that
were
included
in
this
bill
was.
We
were
supposed
to
mail
to
everyone,
a
plan
every
year
and
most
of
those
people
had
already
knew
what
the
plan
was
supposed
to
be
and
had
already
received
copies
of
it.
So
we
streamlined
that
process
that
we
provided
a
guide
on
the
website
and
instead
of
having
to
mail
to
everyone
that
was
involved.
C
Another
change
was
we
added
wastewater
provider
to
who
was
actually
required
to
provide
us
a
plan
for
the
list
of
critical
facilities,
and
that
was
based
upon
a
friendly
amendment
that
came
from
one
of
the
wastewater
providers
in
southern
nevada.
As
that,
we
worked
through
this
process
with
the
collaboration
of
the
public
utilities,
commission,
the
governor's
office
on
energy
and
the
nevada
division
of
environmental
protection,
and
then
probably
the
biggest
piece
of
this
was
the
plans
that
were
required
to
be
submitted
to
us
for
storage.
In
the
event
of
an
emergency.
C
The
listing
of
those
companies
was
kind
of
large.
It
included
people
that
sold
like
phone
cards
that
were
not
had
any
or
that
who
did
not
have
any
physical
infrastructure
within
the
state,
but
we're
still
required
by
law
to
provide
us
a
plan
and
instead
of
trying
to
wordsmith
exactly
that
definition
that
would
fit
all
those
different
partners.
C
From
a
utility
standpoint,
where
something
happened
nefariously
to
them,
we
want
to
have
immediate
details
for
that:
local
fire
department,
the
local
law
enforcement
and
the
local
emergency
manager,
the
state
of
the
repository
for
those
plans
and
those
needs,
and
so
working
through
our
partners.
We're
able
to
kind
of
clean
up
some
of
that
language
and
make
this
a
little
more
simple
document
for
everyone
involved
and
depending
on
that
chair
and
any
questions
you
have,
I'm
just
trying
to
keep
it
short
and
sweet
for
you.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you.
I
think
the
members
will
agree
that
we
we
really
very
much
enjoy
short
and
sweet.
So
thank
you
for
that.
At
this
time,
members
will
open
up
for
questions.
D
Thank
you
for
the
presentation.
I
appreciate
it.
So
just
a
quick
question:
I'm
looking
at
section
one
of
the
legislation
on
page
five
subsection
seven
when
we're
looking
at
the
portion
talking
about
the
written
guide,
we're
no
longer
providing
the
guy
to
those
agencies,
and
I
understand
that
the
intent
is
to
have
it
posted
online
and
have
it
accessible.
D
But
I'm
just
wondering
why
we
wouldn't
want
it
still
to
be
provided
and
disseminated
to
these
agencies
and
even
if
it
was
just
electronically,
but
to
still
require
that
that
is
disseminated
to
those
agencies.
So
they
have
quick
and
immediate
access
to
it
immediately
upon
it
being
completed.
C
To
the
chair
device
chair,
taurus
dave
ferguson
for
the
record,
good
question
ma'am,
and
that
was
part
of
what
we
talked
with
our
with
the
stakeholders
about
was
whether
they
really
needed
that
guide
every
year
or
not,
and
majority
of
them
said
that
they
did
not
need
that
guide
every
year.
C
It
doesn't
really
change
that
frequently
so,
rather
than
sending
it
to
them
having
a
post
on
the
website,
and
then
we
send
them
a
notice,
reminding
them
that
their
plan
is
due
and
that
notice
does
have
the
website
link
in
it
for
them
to
come
and
reach
it
and
get
it
from
us
that
way.
We
have
some
documentation.
We
did
send
them
notice
of
their
requirement
to
meet
this
interest,
but
also
not
have
to
mail
them.
The
entire
plan
itself.
D
Please,
please
review
this
guide
as
there
are
changes
in
this
section,
so
that
they're
they're
aware
that
those
changes
have
been
made
since
the
guide
generally
stays
the
same.
C
Through
the
chair
to
the
vice
chair,
dave
foberson
with
the
record
absolutely
and
that's
what
in
the
letter
we
mail
them
every
year,
it
does
have
that
it
will
have
that
link
for
that
in
there
rather
than
emailing
the
link,
we
mail
them
a
hard
copy
letter.
That
does
say
you
have
to
meet
this
requirement
of
interest
and
that
link
would
be
included
in
that
that
letter
to
them.
Sorry,
if
I
didn't
make
that
clear
than
the
first
answer.
E
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
I
just
had
a
question
about
the
addition
of
of
wastewater
service
from
the
wastewater
providers.
I
guess
I
I
don't
understand
what
wastewater
service
covers.
Does
it
cover
only
those
that
serve
or
have
500
more
service
locations
or
when
it
says
private
entities?
Does
that
also
include
entities
that
are
creating
wastewater.
C
Through
the
chair
of
the
assembly,
woman,
dave,
fogerson,
nevada,
emergency
manager
for
the
record,
this
was
a
friendly
amendment
that
came
from
one
of
the
wastewater
companies
in
southern
nevada,
one
of
the
the
general
improvement
district
down
there.
That
does
the
wastewater.
It
would
only
be
for
the
wastewater
companies
that
have
500
or
more
service
locations,
so
it
wouldn't
be
the
smaller
general
improvement
district.
C
It's
going
to
be
the
smaller
companies
that
have
wastewater,
but
it
would
be
for
the
companies
that
are
actually
the
wastewater
service
provider,
and
this
was
the
industry
term
that
was
familiar
to
them
and
that
nevada
division,
environmental
protection
said,
would
be
appropriate
along
with
that
stakeholder
that
provided
that
feedback
to
us
to
do
this
addition
and
they're
important,
because
we
don't
really
think
about
some
of
the
products
they
use
to
clean
the
waste
waters
to
make
it
clean
that
way.
It
goes
back
in
the
environment,
but
also
the
backup
that
exists.
C
Should
we
have
a
problem
with
getting
rid
of
the
water
once
it's
been
used
that
causes
a
ripple
effect
all
the
way
back
through
the
system
back
to
producing
the
water,
and
then
the
infrastructure
concerns
are
up.
So
this
was
kind
of
a
big
thing
to
add
to
it,
and
that
was
the
language
that
was
suggested
to
us
by
all
the
stakeholders
to
to
make
it
clear
for
them.
E
I
just
wanted
to
make
it
clear
clarify
for
me,
so
these
are
for
the
the
entities
that
are
cleaning
the
waste
water.
This
is
not
safe
for
a
private
entity
that,
because
of
what
they
do,
they're
creating
waste
waste.
C
G
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
Thank
you
for
the
presentation.
I've
got
two
questions.
Actually
the
first
has
to
do
with
page
six
section,
2.4
line
37
the
vulnerability
assessment
is
that
defined
any
place.
Is
that
what
is
the
vulnera?
I
know
that
it's
mentioned
in
other
areas
as
well
of
this,
so
is
it
defined
in
other
areas,
though,
I
guess
I
just
don't
know
exactly
what
makes
a
vulnerability
assessment
if
that
can
be
defined
a
little
bit.
C
Better
through
the
chair
of
the
assembly,
woman,
david
fogerson
of
the
record,
yes
ma'am,
the
vulnerability
assessment,
I
believe,
is
in
another
section
of
this
interest
that
talks
about
what
it
is.
It's
also
in
our
guidance
document
that
we
provide
to
them,
and
it's
a
industry
term
on
determining
what
is
the
vulnerability?
What
are
the
hazards?
C
What
are
the
risks
that
that
facility
has
where
that
could
be
impacted,
either
nefariously
or
through
a
natural
disaster
that
would
affect
the
other
sectors,
and
that
is
in
that
document
that
we
provide
the
planning
guide,
that
we
provide
to
them
to
to
evaluate
every
year
and
then
that
vulnerability
assessment
once
they
find
what
their
problems
are,
then
that
drives
them
developing
an
emergency
response
plan
to
address
the
problems
rather
than
just
having
a
generic
plan.
C
F
G
Thank
you
and,
and
that
totally
makes
sense,
so
the
guiding
document
is
not
a
regulation
that
has
to
be
filed
with
anybody
or
it
is
based
upon
the
the
department's
internal
look
at
the
area.
I
guess
that's
just
I
that's
where
my
questions
are
coming
from
when
it
comes
from
the
guiding
document.
C
To
the
assembly
woman,
from
or
through
the
chair
to
the
similar
woman,
dave
fogerson
to
the
record
that
would
be
outlined
in
what
we
do
is
we
provide
them
a
guide
to
what
their
plan
needs
to.
H
C
We
don't
regulate
the
industry,
so
we
do
not
actually
inspect
and
approve
their
plans.
Division.
Emergency
management,
responsibility
under
ns239
c
is
to
maintain
the
plans
for
the
local
responders
or
for
the
regulators
to
look
at
in
those
times
and
needs
that
they're
having
issues
there.
So
those
are
things
that
then
the
public
utilities
commission
would
be
involved
with
them,
with
helping
them
to
write
that
that
document
and
see
what
their
hazards
are.
So
it's
not
a
regulation.
It
is
our
guide
of
here's
how
you
identify
what
your
risks
are.
C
G
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
that
clarification
and
then,
if
I
could
ask
a
question,
that's
in
a
different
section.
Thank
you.
It
kind
of
goes
back
to
what
vice
chair
taurus
was
bringing
up
about
posting
the
guide.
If
there
are
changes
that
are
done
at
the
legislative
level
or
even
in
other
levels,
is
there
a
requirement
to
contact
the
parties,
or
is
that
something
that
the
department
can
choose
to
do.
C
Through
the
chair
to
the
assembly
woman,
david
fogerson
for
the
record
ma'am
every
year
that
they
have
to
maintain
compliance
that
every
we
determine
who
needs
immediate
compliance
with
this
section,
and
then
we
produce
a
letter
that
goes
to
those
companies
and
the
general
improvement
districts
or
those
local
governments
that
provide
these
services.
And
we
send
them
a
letter
that
outlines
that
they
must
meet
the
requirements
section.
And
then,
in
that
letter
it
would
say
what
this
where
to
find.
A
Thank
you
members,
any
additional
questions.
I
don't
believe
we
have
any
more.
Thank
you
members
for
your
questions
and
thank
you
for
that
dialogue
back
and
forth
at
this
time
we'll
go
ahead
and
invite
those
wishing
to
testify
in
support
of
senate
bill
14..
A
A
I
A
Thank
you,
sir.
Any
closing
remarks
on
senate
bill,
14
that
you
may
have.
C
Chairman
committee
members,
david
fogerson,
from
division
of
emerging
management
records,
just
want
to
thank
everyone
for
the
consideration
of
our
recommended
changes
to
this
language
in
the
nrs,
and
I
would
be
remiss
as
your
emergency
manager
if
I
didn't
discuss
personal
awareness,
why
I
had
your
attention
real,
quick,
remember
our
big
disasters
in
the
matter
of
earthquake,
wildland
fire
flood
pandemic
and
drought,
and
we
need
to
make
sure
that
everyone
is
able
to
survive
on
their
own
for
three
to
seven
days
in
the
event
that
one
of
those
big
disasters
does
occur.
C
J
A
A
J
Okay,
sorry
about
that
I'll
I'll,
be
brief
and
and
I'll
yell.
So
hopefully
that
helps
so
this
bill
was
drafted
in
spring
of
last
year
and
is
seeking
the
ability
to
do
two
things
very
briefly:
it's
to
develop
and
maintain
grant
policies
and
to
provide
flexibility
in
our
office
operations
and
services
rendered,
and
I
can
stop
there
and
take
questions
directly
or
share
if
you'd
like.
I
can
go
into
further
detail
about
those
changes.
A
Please
continue
with
the
details.
Thank
you.
J
Okay,
so
the
first
thing
that
it
does
is,
it
adds
to
the
extent
practicable
to
our
grant
office
activities
with
the
copen
19
pandemic.
It
showed
that
there
are
valuable
services.
The
grant
office
could
provide
like
tracking
code
funding,
that
can't
be
anticipated
and
that
we
also
need
to
adjust
for
according
to
staff
levels.
So
this
will
allow
us
to
continue
to
provide
services
to
state
agencies
and
others,
as
we
can
and
then
also
to
adjust
as
needed.
J
You
know,
as
we
find
out
and
identify
more
issues
that
can
be
helpful
in
how
we
can
be
more
helpful
to
grant
services,
and
the
second
thing
it
does
is
it
provides
us
the
ability
to
update,
grant
policies.
The
grant
office
created
the
grant
policy
manual
in
2018
and
it
is
referenced
in
the
state
administrative
manual.
J
However,
we
don't
have
the
authority
to
make
changes
to
these
policies,
so
we,
this
is
seeking
to
give
us
the
authority
to
update
or
change
or
to
implement
requirements
for
statewide
operational
grants.
Right
now,
we're
limited,
like
the
the
federal
uniform
guidance
changed
updated
in
2020,
and
we
haven't
been
able
to
update
our
policy
manual.
So
this
will
allow
us
to
do
that
and
those
are
very
high
level
what
what
those
do
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
K
J
Yes,
thank
you
for
the
record
aaron
hasty
through
your
chair
to
assemblywoman
thomas.
So
that
is
a
requirement
that
we
already
have
to
do
and
if
you
see
on
line
three
and
four,
it
switches
the
rest
of
it
to
the
greatest
extent
practical,
practicable
and
it
it
does
keep
the
shell.
So
we're
already
required
to
do
that
and
it
makes
sure
that
we're
still
giving
you
a
report.
K
I'm
a
little
confused
because
the
next
subsection
three,
the
administrator
may
so
there's
a
choice
there
to
provide
this
information.
I'm
I'm
confused
on.
You
know
the
directive
and
then
you
know
well,
you
know
if
if
the
administrator
feels
like
it.
J
For
the
record,
aaron
hasty
and
through
you
chair
to
the
assemblywoman,
so
the
may
is,
is
currently
how
it
stands.
J
You
provide
training
that
was
my
position
before
covid
came
in,
I
had
to
develop
training,
and
so
this
allows
us
flexibility
as
our
staff
levels
fluctuate
and
as
we're
identifying
issues
that
might
need
to
take
priority.
For
example,
you
know
we
found
that
kobe
needed
to
take
priority
with
that,
and
unfortunately
we
had
to
lessen
our
training.
So
this
allows
us
to
adapt
to
circumstances,
but
all
of
these
activities
are
very
important
and
we
have
feedback
and
surveys
that
show
that
all
these
activities
are
important
and
we
strive
to
provide
all
of
these.
K
Second,
follow-up
cheer
police
follow.
Please
thank
you
for
that
explanation,
but
my
my
I
guess
basic
concern
is
the
reporting
back
to
the
de
director
of
the
lcb
and
to
the
legislature
that
if
you
have
the
option
to
report
back,
that's
what
this
is
telling
me
that
you
do
have
that
option,
but
then
and.
K
But
and
it's
that's
okay-
that
in
a
sense
you're
saying
that
the
you
know
what
you
you
are
directed
to
do
is
that
report
back
and
then
you
may
include
some
of
the
information
that
we're
asking
for.
Thank
you.
J
Okay
for
the
record,
aaron
hasty,
sorry
to
cut
you
off,
so
we
are
required
to
report
to
you
and
that
keeps
that
in
there
we
must
do
that
and
we
have
every
every
biennium
and
how
we've
structured
it
prior
is.
We
have
put
everything:
that's
referenced
in
statute,
we'll
report
to
you
on
what
we
do
and
we'll
continue
to
do
that.
So
if
it
says
training
and
we've
had
to
lessen
it
like,
we
did
have
to
last
time.
F
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
thank
you,
miss
hasty
for
the
presentation,
just
regarding
section
three
subsection
b,
I'm
just
wondering
if
you
could
just
speak
to
a
couple
of
practical
examples
where
you
know
absent
this,
enabling
language
there
have
been
some
some
problems
or
challenges
that
that
could
be
avoided
by
by
inserting
this
just
to
put
this
kind
of
in
real
practical
terms.
Thank
you.
J
Yes,
thank
you,
aaron
hastie,
for
the
record
for
you,
chair
to
the
assemblyman.
Thank
you
yeah.
So
the
policies
and
procedures
are
vitally
important
for
any
organization
and
state
to
reduce
audit
findings
to
make
sure
that
we're
doing
appropriate,
sub-recipient
monitoring
and
things
like
that.
So
practically
speaking,
we
have
right
now
sub-recipient
monitoring.
So
if
a
agency
awards
a
grant
to
somebody
else,
they
have
to
follow
these
guidelines.
They
need
to
do
a
risk
assessment.
They
need
to
check
a
suspended
and
debarred
list.
J
You
know
those
kind
of
things
they
need
to
to
make
sure
that
if
there
is
risk
they're
they're
catching
that
and
following
it
up
and
they
might
need
to
provide
a
little
extra
oversight
right
now
we
have
the
inability
to
update
it
and
federal
guidance
changed
in
2020
this
november
2020..
J
A
Thank
you,
assemblyman
members,
any
additional
questions
assembly
one
brown
made
please.
L
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
Thank
you,
miss
hasty
for
your
presentation,
relative
to
grants,
and
first
I
want
to
congratulate
you
for
the
work
that
you've
done
over
the
biennium.
I
know
that
your
division
has
been
very,
very
busy,
and
so
I
have
a
couple
of
questions
relative
to
how
we're
communicating
the
information
to
state
agencies
so
first
line
17
under
section
1,
says,
if
requested
by
the
director
of
the
state
agency.
L
J
That
is
one
of
the
things
you
know
in
our
office
is
we're
here
to
be
helpful,
but
we
don't
really
have
any
authority
besides
the
policy
manual,
it's
kind
of
seen
as
a
best
practice,
and
so
we
do
try
and
reach
out,
but
we
do
not
have
authority
over
other
agencies.
That's
correct.
L
Thank
you,
miss
hasty.
If
I
move
up
to
line
e,
I
I
see
the
word
ensure,
meaning
that
you
are
desiring
to
ensure
the
state
agencies
are
aware
of
any
grant
opportunities.
I'm
curious
to
know:
do
you
have
methodology
that
you
would
propose
to
ensure
that
the
state
agencies
are
aware
that
there
are
grants
available
to
them
and
then
yeah?
I
guess
that's
the
real,
the
real
question:
what's
the
methodology.
J
Thank
you
and
aaron
hastie
for
the
record
through
you,
chair
to
the
assembly
woman
right
now,
honestly,
it
is
pretty
piece,
you
know,
part
and
parcel.
We,
we
scour
grants.gov
for
covid,
only
we're
still
there
and
then
we'll
send
out
listservs
and
email,
and
if
we
have
the
relationships
we'll
let
people
know
like
hey
this.
This
opportunity
is
available
to
you
like
we've
shared
before.
I
think
that
it
could
be
a
lot
more
robust.
J
You
know
that
is
you
know
when
we
can
have
the
opportunity
and
when
the
budget
allows
a
centralized
grant
management
system
would
help
with
that
it
can
notify
people
right
away.
We
can
track
what
we're
not
applying
for
who's
interested
and
that
kind
of
thing
it
would
be
a
lot
more
sophisticated
right
now,
we're
you
know
it's
a
lot
of
manpower
to
go
through
this
serves
and
put
those
together.
Does
that
answer
your
question.
L
J
For
the
record
aaron
hastie
and
I
can
pull
that
and
we
do
have
an
excel
grant
services
tracker.
I
presented
a
little
bit
about
that
on
my
presentation
to
you
gosh
a
couple
months
ago
feels
like
this
a
while
ago.
We
can
pull
that
we
do
track
who
who
we're
coordinating
with.
A
K
Yes,
sir,
thank
you,
mr
chair
and
miss
hastie,
just
a
follow-up
question
to
assembly,
one,
a
woman
brown
may
when
she
asked
about
the
insurer.
K
You
said
that
if
you
have
a
relationship
with
different
agencies,
so
if
they
contact
you,
then
you
can
ensure
that
or
you
know,
base
that
information
on
whether
or
not
grants
are
available.
K
J
Thank
you
for
the
record
aaron
hasting
through
your
chair
to
the
assemblywoman.
Yes,
we
do.
We
have
listservs
that
are
13
topic
areas
that
we'll
send
out
regularly
to
there's
like
education,
higher
ed
workforce,
all
kinds
of
topics,
so
we
will
we
send
those
out
on
our
list
serves,
and
we
also
post
those
to
our
website
I'll,
send
you
our
grant
office
report.
It
goes
through
in
detail
all
of
what
we
have
and
we
do
alert
people.
It's
just
that.
J
A
I
don't
believe
we
have
any
additional
questions
at
this
time.
Thank
you
for
answering
our
questions
and
for
the
presentation
this
morning.
At
this
time,
we'll
we'll
open
up
the
hearing
and
invite
those
wishing
to
testify
in
support
of
senate
bill
15..
We
have
quite
a
bit
of
people
in
the
committee
room
now,
we'll
start
off
with
with
mr
keith,
whenever
you're
ready,
sir.
F
F
Currently
nevada,
sits
45th
in
grant
procurement
per
capita
according
to
the
guinn
center
and
since
2013
the
vegas
chamber
has
made
it
a
priority
to
improve
that
number
to
make
sure
that
nevadans
are
getting
the
care,
the
infrastructure
and
the
dollars
that
we
deserve
for
too
long.
We've
left
dollars
on
the
table
that
are
available
to
us
from
the
federal
government,
and
it
is
high
time
that
we
streamline
our
process,
and
this
is
a
great
bill
to
do
so
and
to
make
sure
that
we
are
receiving
the
federal
grant
dollars
that
nevada
deserves.
A
I
I
I
I
H
As
mr
keith
mentioned,
the
state
has
a
long
way
to
go,
and
I
know,
as
you've
heard
several
times
now,
this
section
from
presentations
in
terms
of
our
ability
to
maximize
federal
funding
so
just
want
to
quickly
get
on
the
record
support
for
this
bill.
While
it
is
modest
and
changes,
it
adds
important
flexibility
as
well
as
enabling
language
for
the
work
that
the
grants
office
does.
Thank
you
so
much.
A
And
thank
you
for
joining
us
this
morning.
Next
caller
wishing
to
testify
in
support
of
senate
bill
15.
I
A
And
thank
you
for
your
presentation
and
I'm
sure
members
will
continue
to
reach
out.
Should
any
additional
questions
arise
at
this
time,
we'll
go
ahead
and
close
out
the
hearing
on
senate
bill
15
and
next
we'll
invite
those
wishing
to
testify
for
public
comment.
I
want
to
remind
those
of
you
who
intend
to
call
in
for
public
comment
that
this
is
not
a
time
to
reopen
a
hearing.
A
It
is
for
you
to
speak
about
general
matters
that
fall
within
the
purview
of
this
committee.
We
encourage
you
to
call,
but
I
don't
want
to
have
to
cut
you
off
if
you
try
to
reopen
the
hearing
on
a
particular
bill
with
that
broadcast,
we'll
go
to
the
phone
lines.
Anybody
wishing
to
testify
during
public
comment.
A
Thank
you
broadcast
and
with
that
members,
I
want
to
remind
you
that
tomorrow
we're
going
to
be
meeting
in
this
room
again
at
9
00
a.m.
We
have
senate
bill
38
and
senate
bill
372
on
the
agenda.
Please
give
yourself
an
opportunity
to
go
over
those
two
bills
and
become
ready
to
engage
in
some
thoughtful
dialogue.