►
From YouTube: 4/22/2021 - Assembly Committee on Government Affairs
Description
For agenda and additional meeting information: https://www.leg.state.nv.us/App/Calendar/A/
Videos of archived meetings are made available as a courtesy of the Nevada Legislature.
The videos are part of an ongoing effort to keep the public informed of and involved in the legislative process.
All videos are intended for personal use and are not intended for use in commercial ventures or political campaigns.
Closed Captioning is Auto-Generated and is not an official representation of what is being spoken.
A
A
A
For
those
of
you
wishing
to
join
us
for
public
comment,
please
know
that
we'll
be
doing
that
at
the
conclusion
of
today's
meeting
members.
I
want
to
remind
you
that
please
make
sure
that
you
are
not
logged
in
via
zoom
and
that
you
are
in
the
committee
room.
We
want
you
to
either
be
in
the
committee
room
or
logged
in
via
zoom,
but
not
both
as
it
will
cause
chaos
behind
the
scenes.
A
Everyone
wishing
to
testify
today
before
the
committee,
I
want
to
remind
you
to
please
state
your
name
after
each
question.
That's
not,
for
our
sake,
it's
for
you
to
help
our
hard-working
staff
to
ensure
that
they
can
properly
take
minutes.
So
please,
after
each
question,
please
make
sure
you
state
your
name
for
the
record
each
and
every
time
and
with
that
we're
going
to
go
ahead
and
get
the
agenda
started
and
we'll
open
up
the
hearing
on
senate
bill.
38-
and
I
know
we
have
both
miss
adair
and
mr
george,
whenever
you're
ready.
A
C
Good
morning,
chair
floors,
members
of
committee,
my
name
is
kyle
george
and
I'm.
The
first
assistant
attorney
general
with
the
office
of
the
nevada
attorney
general.
My
colleague,
jessica
guercio
staff
will
be
joining
you
in
person
shortly.
She
is
currently
stuck
in
the
assembly
judiciary
committee
meeting,
and
I
think
we
can
agree
that
I
got
the
better
end
of
this
deal
this
morning.
C
Under
current
law,
the
office
of
the
attorney
general
is
granted
exclusive
authority
to
represent
the
state
of
nevada
on
legal
matters.
There
are
in
fact,
carve
outs
where
the
office
may
retain
outside
counsel
on
a
contingency
fee
basis.
When
quote
the
attorney
general
lacks
the
resources,
skill
or
expertise
to
provide
representation
in
the
matter.
That
is
the
subject
of
the
contract
or
the
attorney
general's
office
can
also
retain
special
counsel.
If
representation
by
the
attorney
general's
office
is
quote
impracticable
or
could
could
constitute
conflict
that
precludes
us
from
representation.
C
C
For
the
purposes
of
this
testimony,
I
will
be
referencing
reprint
one
of
the
bill
as
passed
by
the
senate.
The
first
substantive
section
of
the
bill
is
section
six,
and
that
section
provides
explicit
authority
for
the
attorney
general
to
enter
into
a
pro
bono
contract
for
legal
services
when
he
or
she
believes
it
is
necessary.
C
Section
seven
provides
that
the
office
of
the
attorney
general
shall
remain
the
ultimate
decision
maker
in
all
aspects
of
litigation
or
matters
in
which
pro
bono
counsel
is
retained.
This
provision
preserves
constitutional
role
of
the
attorney
general
as
a
sole
determiner
of
what
is
in
the
best
legal
interests
of
the
state
section.
8
merely
provides
that
the
office
of
attorney
general
shall
promulgate
a
form
that
must
be
included
in
all
contracts.
C
Message
between
sections,
10
and
11,
however,
is
a
section
10.5
that
was
offered
by
our
office
as
an
amendment
prior
to
the
first
work
session
in
the
senate,
section
10.5
provides
that
any
law
firm
or
attorney
entering
into
a
pro
bono
contract
with
us
is
barred
from
entering
into
a
contract
as
contingency
or
special
counsel
of
the
office
for
a
period
of
one
year.
A
Thank
you
for
that
presentation,
sir,
and
with
that
we'll
open
it
up
for
questions.
I
am
now
checking
the
chat
and
feel
free
to
just
turn
around,
and
let
me
know
if
you
have
a
question
we'll
start
off
with
the
assemblywoman
anderson.
D
C
I
don't
think
there's
a
limitation
placed
on
in
the
language
of
the
bill,
but
we
do
envision
this
as
more
civil
and
criminal.
I
think
the
the
need
in
criminal
matters
is
certainly
less
than
in
in
civil,
where
there's
a
broader,
a
broader
range
of
topics
that
may
arise
that
we
may
not
be
as
well
versed
in
I'm
sorry
for
the
record.
Kyle
george.
D
Thank
you
and
thank
you
for
that
clarification
and
then
my
second
question
had
to
do
with
the
length
of
the
four
years
section
nine,
with
the
four
years.
D
Why?
What
was
the
decision
behind
that
length
of
time?
Because
sometimes
we
do
have
some
litigation,
that
that
is
a
long
longer
time
frame,
obviously
much
more
in-depth
research
and
everything
so
just
trying
to
figure
out
what
the
what
the
reasoning
was
behind
the
four
years
after
the
date
of
the
beginning
or
a
little
bit
more
information
about
that.
That
decision.
C
Of
course,
for
the
record
kyle
george
vs
assistant
attorney
general,
I'm
sorry,
I'm
looking
up
at
the
bill,
so
I
pardon
me
for
the
lack
of
eye
contact
but
say
I
believe,
that's
that
is
consistent
with
other
public
records
or
other
statutory
requirements
to
maintain
records.
C
I'm
not
sure
the
source
of
that
time
period
that
was
provided
by
lcb,
but
but
we
we
do
want
to
retain
the
ability
for
the
public
to
look
back
and
see
the
activity
that
has
been
the
pro
bono
activity,
that's
coming
out
of
our
office
or
coming
through
our
office.
C
I
don't
know
of
any
specific
reason
that
four
years
was
was
selected.
However,.
D
E
Good
morning
tiara
and
thank
you
for
this
opportunity
and
thank
you,
mr
george,
for
your
presentation.
I
just
have
one
question
and
it's
for
clarification,
because
I'm
really
not
understanding
section
10.5.
C
We
added
that
after
the
bill
was
originally
introduced
because
we
realized
there
may
be
some
concerns
that
some
law
firms
are
using
this
as
an
end
run
around
existing
contingency
council
and
and
special
counsel
statutes.
So
under
existing
law
there's
a
bidding
process
that
takes
place
supposed
to
retain
some
kind
of
counsel.
We
we
open
it
up
to
the
public.
We
we
make
sure
that
that
everyone
interested
in
in
such
contract
is
given
an
equal
opportunity
to
participate.
C
What
we
didn't
want
to
do
is
create
the
perception
that
law
firms
and
attorneys
can
buy
access
to
attorney
general's
contracts
through
pro
bono
representations,
in
other
words,
pay
for
play.
We
didn't
want
to
create
a
situation
where
a
law
firm
was
offering
free
legal
services
in
one
matter,
perhaps
a
smaller
matter
and
then
subsequently
getting
an
award
for
a
large
legal
contract
or
a
large
contingency
fee
contract.
That
would
create
a
perception
that
they
bought
access
to
the
attorney
general's
office
through
their
pro
bono
services.
C
We
thought
the
construction
of
excluding
them
for
one
year
period,
a
cooling
off
period,
if
you
will
would
would
ensure
that
that
type
of
situation
doesn't
arise
and
doesn't
create
some
sort
of
mistrust
that
the
contingency
council
of
special
counsel
statutes
were
being
abused.
F
Thank
you
chair.
Thank
you,
mr
george,
and
thank
you
for
that
last
answer
and
for
addressing
those
those
concerns
regarding
the
the
potential
pay-to-play
situations
which,
obviously
we
want
to
avoid.
I'm
wondering
if
you
could
speak
to
whether
there
are
certain
policy
areas
where
you
have
seen
a
particular
need
for
this
type
of
pro
bono
work
or
there
are
certain
areas
where
you
envision.
C
Thank
you,
assemblyman
for
the
record.
Kyle
george
two
specific
circumstances
come
to
mind
one.
In
the
past
few
years
the
state
has
been
gay
was
engaged
in
litigation
against
the
united
states
department
of
energy
over
plutonium
that
was
shipped
to
our
state
and
that
area
of
law
was
is
very
specialized
and
not
something
we
would
ordinarily
house
within
the
attorney
general's
office.
That
skill
set
is
not
ordinarily
housed
within
the
attorney
general's
office.
C
In
that
particular
case,
we
retained
outside
council,
but
were
there
opportunities
to
get
pro
bono
council
and
save
taxpayer
money?
We
would
in
fact
be
have
been
precluded
from
doing
so.
The
other
circumstance
arise
arose
more
recently
within
the
last
year,
as
collective
bargaining
came
into
effect
in
the
state
of
nevada.
C
Collective
bargaining
was
not
previously
provided
for
this.
Our
agency
was
not
previously
involved
in
it
and
for
us
to
actively
and
meaningfully
participate
in
collective
bargaining.
There
was
a
steep
ramp
up
of
of
legal
skills.
We
had
to
train
up
very
quickly
on
an
area
of
law
that
none
of
us
had
familiarity
with,
and
that
was
one
opportunity,
for
example,
where
consulting
with
with
experts
in
the
field
on
a
pro
bono
basis
would
have
been
helpful.
Had
we
had
the
ability
to
do
so.
A
F
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
that.
Mr
george,
do
you
know,
are
there
other
states
that
have
this
kind
of
allowance
in
statute?
If
so,
roughly
how
many.
C
Thank
you,
someone
for
the
record,
kyle
george,
I
don't
know
the
answer
that
question.
What
I
can
promise
you
is,
I
can
find
out
and
get
back
to
you
with
an
answer.
F
Okay,
thank
you
and
then
finally,
I'm
wondering
if,
if
you
have
identified
or
anticipate
a
situation
where
or
if
you
anticipate,
you
know
the
number
of
outside
attorneys
that
may
be
ideally
situated
to
to
perform
the
type
of
work
you
may
be
looking
for
whether
you
envision
this
being
kind
of
an
array
of
you
know
multiple
attorneys,
who
may
be
providing
this
type
of
work,
whether
there
may
be,
you
know
one
or
two.
F
You
know
my
what
I'm
getting
at
my
main
concern
with
this
may
be
that
you
know
this
could
result
in
sort
of
a
an
unelected
unofficial
but
semi-permanent
extension
of
the
office.
You
know
someone
who
is
sort
of
consistently
being
used
for
these
services
and
become
kind
of
an
official
extension
of
the
ag's
office.
So
I'm
just
wondering
if,
if
you
can
speak
to
that
at
all
and
what
you
anticipate
there,
thank
you.
C
Thank
you
sublime
for
the
record.
Kyle
george.
That's
a
good
question.
I
first.
The
first
part
of
the
answer
is
that
I
don't
anticipate
this
will
be
used
a
lot.
I
think
this
was
really
brought
forth
for
the
rare
occasions
that
we
don't
possess
expertise
in
house.
C
The
attorney
general
of
the
attorney
general's
office
handles
a
wide
variety
of
areas
for
the
state.
It's
it's
a
rare
occasion
that
something
pops
up,
that
we
don't
have
expertise.
In
recently,
for
example,
we
had
a
bankruptcy
matter
that
isn't
really
something
we
normally
do
so
we
had
to
comb
through
our
our
staff
attorneys
to
determine
who
had
still
those
skills
to
help
assist
in
the
matter.
C
Honestly,
I
don't
believe
that
we
will
have
a
standing,
a
standing
shadow
attorney
general
if
you
will,
for
two
reasons
one.
The
best
use
of
pro
bono
services
is
to
get
our
own
in-house
attorneys
up
to
speed
on
the
subject
matter,
as
need
be
that
that
certainly
will
prevent
us
from
having
the
need
for
a
long-term
contract
with
them.
G
Thank
you
chair.
Thank
you,
mr
george,
for
that
great
presentation
and
the
answer
to
that
last
question.
Specifically,
my
question
is
relative
to
attorneys
that
you
would
utilize
for
this
pro
bono
opportunity.
Would
they
be
specifically
attorneys
that
are
licensed
here
in
nevada?
Would
you
have
access
to
attorneys
across
the
country.
C
C
The
expertise
we
we
may
seek
may
not
exist
in
nevada,
for
example,
there
are
some
areas
of
law
that
is
that
are
so
arcane
or
so
unusual
that
if
we
limit
the
bill
to
nevada
attorneys,
only
there
may
be
no
value
to
to
seeking
their
council
their
their
expertise
on
the
subject
may
be
equal
to
others.
So
I
think,
for
that
reason
the
bill
would
be
more
valuable
to
the
attorney
general's
office
if
we
do
have
access
to
two
attorneys
nationally.
B
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
I've
got
a
couple
questions.
My
first
one
is
how
many
attorneys
are
on
staff
at
the
ag's
office.
Now
you
know.
C
Thank
you
assemblyman
for
the
record.
Kyle
george,
I
don't
know
the
exact
answer
off
top
of
my
head.
Within
my
line
alone,
I
have
103
attorneys
that
reports
under
my
my
half
of
the
office
and
we
have
second
assistant
brady,
I'm
not
sure
how
many
tiers
she
has
roughly
our
office
has
about
350
personnel
in
total,
but
that
includes
support
staff
as
well.
B
Okay,
thank
you
and,
and
then
I
know
you
hit
on
my
colleague
answered
about
nine
and
it
says
a
four
year
contract
can
legally.
Can
they
do
that
enter
into
a
contract
when
that's
elected,
positioned
by
that
office?
So
if
I
just
got
elected,
I
could
appoint
somebody
for
four
years
or
hire
somebody
for
a
four
year
program.
C
Thank
you,
assemblyman,
I'm
sorry,
I
didn't
even
cut
you
off
full
record
kyle
george.
Let
me
find
that
provision
of
the
bill,
because
my
understanding
is
that
the
records
related
to
that
retention
must
be
kept
for
for
four
years.
I
don't
believe.
C
Assemblyman,
what
section
were
you
referencing?
Please.
B
Well,
I
was
just
looking
at
number
nine,
where
it
said
section
one,
it
said:
retain
an
attorney
or
law
firm
show
from
the
beginning
of
the
term
for
pro
bono
contract
upon
the
date
not
less
than
four
years.
C
Thank
you
assemblyman
for
the
clarification
for
the
record,
kyle
george.
I
believe
that
section
reads
that
the
records
related
to
this
work
must
be
retained
for
four
years
after
which
contract
expires,
it
doesn't
call
for
a
contract
term
that
goes
up
to
four
years
length.
Additionally,
I
would
I
would
point
out
that
any
contract
of
I
believe
that
a
contract
of
this
magnitude
would
have
to
be
approved
by
the
board
of
examiners
as
well,
which
would
provide,
I
think,
some
sort
of
oversight
on
the
scenario
that
you
described.
E
C
Thank
you
assemblywoman
for
the
record,
kyle
george.
I
can't
think
of
any
examples
off
top
my
head,
but
I
think,
generally
speaking,
legal
experts
take
pride
in
in
the
ability
to
say
we.
I've
assisted
the
attorney
general's
office.
C
The
state
of
nevada
on
this
issue
for
them
becomes
a
selling
point
that
demonstrates
their
expertise
in
a
subject
very
often
in
matters
we've
litigated
in
the
past,
we've
had
firms
offer
to
to
assist
us
whenever
possible,
and
we
obviously
didn't
take
advantage
of
it
because
we
legally
could
not,
but
off
the
top
of
my
head.
I
can't
think
of
a
specific
example
that
would
that
would
really
be
illustrative
on
when
that
would
happen.
But
I
I
do
know
that,
in
practice
of
law
office
of
pro
bono,
assistance
isn't
uncommon
at
all.
A
At
this
time,
I
don't
believe
I
see
any,
thank
you
again
for
your
presentation
and
at
this
time
we'll
invite
those
wishing
to
testify
in
support
of
senate
bill
38.
I
don't
believe
we
have
anybody
here,
public
who
appeared
in
the
committee
room
so
we'll
go
to
those
wishing
to
testify
via
phone
broadcast.
Please.
A
H
A
Thank
you,
sir,
for
your
presentation
and
for
answering
the
members
questions
members.
Thank
you
for
engaging
at
this
time,
we'll
go
ahead
and
close
out
the
hearing
on
senate
bill
38
and
we
could
have
our
senate
majority
leader.
A
If
someone
could
please
notify
her
that
we
are
ready
when
whenever
she
has
an
opportunity,
I
know
that
she's
busy
this
morning,
as
always
so
we'll
go
into
a
quick
one
minute
recess
to
allow
our
senate
majority
leader
to
make
our
way
to
our
committee.
One
minute.
A
A
A
I
Good
morning,
chair
flores
members
of
the
assembly
government
affairs
committee,
it's
great
to
be
here
with
you
all
on
this
lovely
thursday
morning,
and
thank
you
so
much
for
having
me
for
the
record.
My
name
is
nicole
cannazzaro
and
I
represent
senate
district
6,
which
is
located
in
the
northwest
portion
of
the
las
vegas
valley.
I
am
here
today
to
present
to
you
senate
bill
372,
which
revises
the
process
of
reporting
burn
injuries.
I
I
The
clark
county
fire
department,
for
example,
is
the
seventh
busiest
fire
department
in
our
country
and
its
personnel
serve
as
first
responders
to
aid.
Many
of
these
burn
victims
every
single
year,
because
fire
departments
in
nevada
are
busy
with
numerous
responsibilities.
Senate
bill
372
seeks
to
refine
the
reporting
process
for
certain
burn
injuries.
I
Not
all
injuries
are
attributed
to
arson.
There
is
still
some
level
of
investigation
required
in
each
case.
This
bill
establishes
steps
that
need
to
be
followed
after
a
burn.
Injury
occurs.
Primarily,
it
extends
the
necessary
time
frame
from
three
to
seven
working
days
to
report
an
injury
to
the
state
fire
marshal.
I
J
First
good
morning,
mr
chair
and
members
of
the
committee,
my
name
is
dan
heenan,
I'm
the
assistant
fire
chief
for
the
clark
county
fire
department
and
I
oversee
the
fire
investigation
division.
I've
been
employed
by
clark,
county
fire
department
for
the
last
three
years.
Prior
to
that
I
was
a
special
agent
with
the
bureau
of
alcohol,
alcohol,
tobacco
firearms
and
explosives
commonly
referred
to
as
atf
for
30
years.
J
I
was
also
part
of
the
united
states
national
response
team
and
became
team
leader
of
that
unit
for
20
years.
That
unit
would
travel
throughout
the
united
states
and
the
world
when
there
were
large-scale
fires
and
or
explosions
to
assist
the
state
and
local
counterparts
in
determining
how
why
and
where
the
fire
started.
J
Referencing
this
bill
senate
bill
372.
There
are
some
changes
that
we'd
like
to
make
in
section
one,
as
the
senator
said,
we'd
like
to
move
the
reporting
time
from
three
days
to
seven
days.
The
umc
burn
unit
down
here
is
one
of
the
busiest
burn
units
in
the
nation
and
as
such,
they,
the
nurses
and
doctors,
have
responsibility
for
the
medical
care
of
those
patients.
J
All
it
does
is
it
changes
the
form
currently
there's
a
form
created
by
the
nevada
state
fire
marshal's
association
department.
I'm
sorry
that
they
have
to
fill
out.
We've
had
numerous
meetings,
sit
down
meetings
with
the
doctors
and
the
staff
over
at
umc
to
formulate
a
more
current
form.
Not
only
is
it
more
specific
to
the
type
of
burn
injuries
that
we're
looking
at,
but
it
also
can
be
filed
electronically.
J
That
form
will
be
created
by
has
been
created
by
umc
and
will
be
farmed
out
and
sent
out
to
the
various
fire
units
either
las
vegas
fire
henderson
fire,
north
las
vegas,
fire
or
clark
county
fire
down
in
the
south,
and
that
way
we
can
have
a
more
a
better
response
time
to
those
needs.
J
Additionally,
it
changes
the
type
of
burn
injury
to
be
reported
as
to
open
flame
explosion
or
flash
fire
and
I'll
I'll
sit
back
in
a
minute,
and
let
the
doctors
and
nurses
explain
to
you
why
that
change
is
effective,
but
basically
the
nurses
and
the
doctors
have
a
better
understanding
about
whether
the
burn
injury,
that's
being
presented
lines
up
with
the
facts
and
circumstances
as
told
to
them
by
the
by
the
victim
of
the
burn
injury.
J
Finally,
in
section
two
which
refers
to
current
nrs
475.125,
currently
it
says
that
we
as
fire
investigation
divisions
when
we
receive
information
from
a
hospital.
We
shall
investigate
it.
We'd
like
to
change
that
word
to
may,
that
gives
the
managers
of
the
fire
investigation
units
the
ability
to
manage
their
people
properly
to
manage
their
caseload
of
their
respective
fire
investigation
divisions,
and
that
way
we
ensure
that
we're
really
focusing
on.
J
If
it
turns
out
to
be
an
incendiary
fire
commonly
referred
to
as
an
arson,
we
can
identify
those
people
and
really
concentrate
on
those
focal
points.
More
specifically,
that
ends
my
little
presentation.
I'm
happy
to
answer
questions
after
the
burn
unit
manager
speaks
to
you.
G
My
name
is
yasmin
conaway.
I
am
a
registered
nurse
with
over
11
years
experience
in
burn
care
and
I'm
currently
the
program
manager
at
the
lions
burned
care
center
at
university.
Medical
center
of
southern
nevada
in
las
vegas.
Dr
sukeeb
sends
his
apologies.
He
was
unable
to
make
this
hearing
today
he's
currently
seeing
patients
in
the
clinic
and
is
on
call
today,
but
this
would
not
have
been
possible
without
him.
G
By
way
of
background.
We
are
the
oldest
and
only
verified
burn
center
in
the
state
of
nevada,
which
means
we
provide
the
highest
level
quality
care
and
still
pursue
ways
to
improve
patient
outcomes
even
after
they
leave
the
rejuvenating
confines
of
a
hospital
room
or
seek
the
expertise
of
our
outpatient
clinic
team.
We
are
fully
verified
by
the
american
burn
association.
G
G
Currently,
the
bill
does
not
delineate
any
mechanism
of
injury
requiring
all
types
of
injuries
to
be
reported,
including
scalds
contact
burns
and
friction
burns.
So
the
person
making
soup
that
spills
a
pot
of
boiling
water
on
themselves
gets
reported
the
elderly
person
that
checks
the
mail
falls
on
the
hot
sidewalk
and
sustains
a
pavement
burn
from
the
hot
concrete
gets
reported,
or
the
motorcycle
driver
that
skids
across
the
asphalt
after
crap.
After
a
crash
sustaining
a
friction,
burn
gets
reported.
G
G
G
The
updated
form
would
integrate
seamlessly
with
the
changes
stated
earlier
by
allowing
for
standardization,
flexibility,
cooperation
and
coordination
amongst
the
affected
parties.
Given
the
benefits,
I
strongly
encourage
you
to
consider
the
passage
of
the
revised
provision
of
this
bill.
Doing
so
means
you
will
be
making
a
direct
positive
impact
on
how
we
use
public
resources,
provide
outreach
and
education
work
within
particular
budget
constraints
and
benefit
the
health
and
well-being
of
all
nevadans
and
visitors.
Thank
you
to
the
committee
for
your
time.
I
welcome
any
questions.
A
Thank
you
and
I
I
think
I
echo
the
sentiment
of
the
committee.
I
know
that
this
year
has
obviously
been
incredible.
Better
said
last
year
in
the
beginning
of
this
year
has
been
incredibly
difficult
for
all
the
work
that
our
first
responders
medical
personnel
have
been
doing.
So
we
just
wanted
to
thank
you
for
your
tremendous
efforts.
We
know
that
you
have
been
the
unrecognized
heroes
at
times.
I
know
we
often
say
thank
you,
but
it's
not
enough.
A
So
we
just
wanted
to
thank
you
again
and
please
say
thank
you
to
our
our
doctor,
who
couldn't
be
here
today,
should
never
apologize
for
taking
care
of
humans
over
presenting
a
bill.
So
thank
you
with
that
senate
majority
leader.
Do
you
have
any
additional
questions?
Excuse
me
comments,
or
should
we
open
up
for
questions.
A
E
E
We
know
that
we
want
less
reporting
of
issues
that
concern
the
fire
department,
but
my
biggest
concern
are
those
other
reports
that
should
go
out.
Those
of
abuse
of
our
children
and
or
elderly.
E
I
Thank
you
for
the
question
through
you,
mr
chair
to
assemblywoman
thomas,
and
it's
good,
to
see
you
here
in
assembly
government
affairs,
nicole,
cannazzaro,
senate
district
6..
This
bill
does
not
change
any
of
the
required
mandatory
reporting
statutes.
That
would
require
reports
for
child
abuse
or
elderly
abuse
that
come
in,
and
I
think
with
respect
to
where
those
may
be
related
to
burn
injuries
that
come
into
any
of
the
healthcare
providers.
I
They
would
still
be
required
where
those
burn
injuries
are
associated
with
what
you're
seeing
here,
which
is
that
open
flame
explosion,
flash
fire
that
are
not
explained
by
something.
As
simple
as
and
I
think
nurse
conway
mentioned,
you
know
someone
who
spills
hot
water
on
their
hand,
and
that
burn
is
consistent
with
that.
Then
that
report
would
not
have
to
be
part
of
the
investigation,
but
obviously
were
there
suspected
child
abuse
going
on
or
suspected
elderly
abuse.
A
Great,
thank
you,
assemblywoman
members,
any
additional
questions.
A
A
A
A
H
A
A
next
on
the
agenda
is
public
comment.
I
want
to
remind
those
of
you
who
wish
to
join
us
for
public
comment
via
phone.
We
encourage
you
to
call
in.
We
want
you
to
participate,
but
this
is
not
a
time
to
reopen
a
hearing.
It's
a
time
for
you
to
call
in
and
speak
about
general
matters
that
fall
within
the
purview
of
this
committee.
A
A
A
A
Bills,
excuse
me-
and
I
know
assemblyman
macarthur
will
be
there
to
help.
Madam
vice
chair
should
have
been
necessary.
A
Yes,
our
our
influencer
of
the
building
inspiring
the
youth,
sir
inspiring
the
youth
members.
Thank
you
all
for
everything.
This
meeting's
adjourned.
Oh
excuse
me
by
the
way.
I
I
need
to
do
this
now,
because
I
forgot
to
do
it
yesterday
and
I
and
I
intend
to
have
a
nice
wonderful
dinner
with
our
staff
at
some
point,
but
I
I
just
wanted
to
say
yesterday.
A
I
know
we
were
supposed
to
do
a
quick
shout
out
and
say
for
stafford
appreciation
day
and
I
think
it's
titled
differently,
but
but
I
just
wanted
to
say
thank
you
to
our
amazing
staff
here
in
the
government
affairs
committee.
I've
consistently
said
of
that,
and
you
all
know
how
amazing
they
are,
but
I
just
wanted
to
once
again
yesterday.
A
I
forgot
to
do
it,
but
I
just
wanted
to
say
it
publicly
today
and
how
incredibly
grateful
I
am
to
have
such
an
amazing
group
of
folks
around
me
and
and
you
all
and
this
committee
would
not
be
anything
without
them.
So
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
and
if
I
could
have
joined
in
their
honor,
this
meeting's.