►
Description
For agenda and additional meeting information: https://www.leg.state.nv.us/App/Calendar/A/
Videos of archived meetings are made available as a courtesy of the Nevada Legislature.
The videos are part of an ongoing effort to keep the public informed of and involved in the legislative process.
All videos are intended for personal use and are not intended for use in commercial ventures or political campaigns.
Closed Captioning is Auto-Generated and is not an official representation of what is being spoken.
A
A
And
I
am
here,
I
believe,
assemblyman
wheeler
is
running
late.
If
he
does
arrive,
we
will
mark
him
present,
but
absent
excuse
until
he
does
arrive.
I
thank
you
all
for
your
patience
today.
It
has
been
a
very
hectic
day,
so
thank
you
for
being
here
for
those
who've
been
waiting
patiently
for
the
bill.
Hearing
that
we
will
have
today.
Thank
you
for
your
patience
committee.
We
will
have
one
bill
hearing
followed
by
a
work
session
for
the
bill
hearing
in
the
interest
of
time.
A
What
we
have
done
all
week
is
have
15
minutes
of
testimony
for
support,
15
minutes
of
opposition
and
15
minutes
in
neutral,
and
anyone
calling
in
for
public
comment
or
to
testify
on
the
bill.
We'll
have
two
minutes
for
the
testimony
and
committee
secretary.
Please
know
that
assemblyman
wheeler
has
been
able
to
join
us.
A
C
Oh,
thank
you,
madam
chair.
I'm
david
goldwater,
representing
captain
and
we're
pleased
to
present
assembly
bill
444,
having
worked
in
the
transportation
space
for
a
number
of
years.
This
this
bill
represents
progress
in
our
journey
to
modernize
transportation
and
provide
for
the
safety
and
convenience
of
the
writing
public.
C
C
All
right,
the
bill.
The
bill
seeks
to
accomplish
a
simple
goal:
allowing
regulated
limousines
with
a
certificate
of
public
convenience
to
accept
rides
from
a
tnc
with
drivers
that
are
employees
of
the
company.
C
Currently,
in
order
to
drive
for
a
tnc,
drivers
need
to
be
independent
contractors
and,
conversely,
regulated
companies
can
only
use
drivers
as
defined
in
the
statute,
while
this
is
why
this
is
progressive
is
because
captain's,
unique
business
model
captain
has
the
largest
fleet
of
electric
vehicles
in
the
country.
C
Captain
has
a
largely
the
captain
has
worked
with
nevada
energy
and
the
governor's
office
of
economic
development
to
put
nevada
at
the
forefront
of
a
shift
to
sustainable
transportation
that
not
only
utilizes
electric
vehicles
but
also
seeks
to
elimin
alleviate
congestion
by
utilizing
advanced
technology.
C
In
addition,
this
bill
focuses
on
the
driver,
who
will
now
be
able
to
accept
ride
referrals
the
same
way
they
receive
referrals
from
a
casino
or
a
telephone
call
when
they
call
to
ask
for
a
run
that
driver
will
not
be
an
independent
contractor,
but
an
employee
of
a
regulated
carrier
with
the
rights
and
benefits
employees
should
have
like
health
care
workers
work.
Calm
coverage,
my
apologies
that
the
president
of
captain,
andrew
myers,
could
not
attend
this
hearing.
C
We
were
scheduled
before,
as
you
know,
and
he
was
called
out
of
town
on
family
business
with
me-
is
jeff
burton
captain's,
chief,
captain's
chief
administrative
officer,
madam
chair,
I'm
prepared
to
walk
you
through
a
section
by
section
or
in
this
interest
of
time
answer
the
questions
the
committee
may
have.
C
All
right,
it's
the
first
paragraph,
is
defines
a
limousine
driver.
It's
a
person
who
has
been
issued
a
driver's
permit
by
the
nta
or
employed
under
a
contract
to
operate
a
limousine
section.
Three
means
a
defined
motor
carrier
section
also
further
in
section
four
talks
about
what
the
limousine
service
is,
as
that
continues.
In
section
four
section:
five
talks
about
the
contracting
between
a
tnc
and
a
licensed
motor
carrier,
section
5,
sub
2
contracting
between
a
tnc
and
the
license
motor
carrier.
C
Goes
down
through
section
5
paragraph
3
at
tnc
shall
not
provide
connections
to
potential
passengers
and
related
services
for
periods
where
the
licensed
motor
carrier
has
been
suspended.
So
that's
easy,
we'll
go
down
to
section.
Six
talks
about
the
fair
disclosure
in
in
pardon
me
go
up
to
five
four
and
five
five.
C
C
I
have
sent
a
summary
to
all
of
you
and
to
those
of
you
who
haven't
haven't
spoken
with.
You
have
a
summary
of
the
bill
available
to
you
and
I'm
sure
jeff
and
I
are
available
to
answer
some
questions.
A
D
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
the
presentation.
We
talked
a
little
bit
about
this
morning.
I
just
thought
you
could
give
clarity
to
the
committee,
so
we
we
tried
this
once
before
when
I,
when
I
was
working
at
an
agency
and
the
the
issue
arose
that
to
be
a
to
be
a
tnc
driver,
you
have
to
be
an
independent
contractor
and
two,
but
these
these
limo
drivers
are
already
employed
by
a
limo
company.
So
how
do
you?
C
Jeff
correct
me:
if
I'm
wrong
and
I'll
try
to
take
that
I'm
david
goldwater
speaking
for
the
record,
that's
exactly
what
the
bill
attempts
to
accomplish
is
on
the
both
sides
of
the
ledger
as
a
tnc,
where
you're
required
to
be
an
independent
contractor
in
the
other
side
of
the
ledger,
where
you're
a
regulated
carrier
and
you
have
to
use
employees.
This
bill
seeks
to
create
a
class
of
driver
that
can
both
work
at
for
the
regulated
carrier
and
then
also
accept
rights
from
a
tnc.
E
C
You're
coming
through
loud
and
clear.
So
if
I,
if
you
want
to
add
some
color
to
the
answer
to
assemblyman
levitt's
question,
go
right
ahead.
D
Well,
my
question
is:
is
how
did
you
reconcile
the
current
policy
of
tncs
to
employ
independent
contractors
when
you
have
a
limo
company
that
is
already
employing
these
and
I'm
assuming
that
that
they're,
even
when
they're
driving,
tnc's
or
they're
operating
as
a
tnc,
they're
reporting
back
to
the
limo
company,
and
I
guess
to
add
on
to
that
question,
so
you
could
just
answer
it
all
at
once.
D
Are
the
tnc's
going
to
be
forced
to
go
against
their
current
policy
with
this
legislation
or
they
are
they
going
to
be
able
to?
Are
they?
Are
they
willing
now
to
go
against
that
policy?
Maybe
you
can
kind
of
walk
through
that.
C
C
Goldwater
david
goldwater,
the
bill
seeks
to
that's
exactly
your
question.
The
bill
seeks
to
alleviate
exactly
that
conflict.
That
is
precisely
what
it
means
to
do.
The
tnc's
originally
exist
as
a
platform
to
refer
drivers,
just
as
any
hotel
does
or
as
picking
up
the
telephone
does
to
request
a
driver.
C
A
D
C
C
You
can
ask
the
tncs
whether
or
not
they
they
could
support
this,
but
in
general
they
they
will
be
captain's
partner
in
this
endeavor.
So
when
you
were
able
to
select
maybe
a
green
option
on
one
of
the
tnc's,
that
would
be
something
that
that
they
would
have
to
support.
E
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
Thank
you,
mr
goldwater,
so
that's
really
where
I
think
I'm
gonna
follow
up
on
that,
just
a
little
bit
not
being
in
this
industry
or
having
really
dealt
with
this
specific
issue
before
to
me,
it
sounds
like
and
I'm
gonna
use,
not
your
company,
but
uber
has
a
platform,
and
I
request
an
uber
black
and
they
don't
have
one
available,
but
my
local
limousine
company
does
now.
My
local
limousine
company
is
going
to
be
able
to
send
that
uber
black
on
that
platform.
Is
that
correct
and.
C
E
Okay,
so
was
it
specific
to.
E
You
said
that
mr
goldwater,
you
said
that
it
would
be
specific
to
electric
vehicles.
Would
that
be
the
only
vehicle
that
would
be
allowed
for
this
legislation,
or
would
it
be
any
limousine
vehicle
that
is
in
this
agreement
to
be
able
to
respond?
So
my
question
really:
is
we
if
we
have
limousines
that
are
currently
sitting
in
a
limo
yard
and
they're.
E
C
F
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
mr
goldwater,
mr
burton.
I
think
the
assemblywoman
brown
may
kind
of
ask
my
question,
but
just
to
follow
it
up.
Have
you
been
in
contact
with
uber
black
and
hoover
green
and
they're?
Okay,
with
this
that's
kind
of
where
we're
going,
I
think.
C
David
goldwater
that
to
to
assemblyman
wheeler,
yes,
they
are
okay.
With
this,
they
would
have
to
contract
with
captain
in
order
to
or
any
limousine
company.
In
order
to
do
this
couldn't
happen
unless
they
did.
C
Oh,
madam
chair,
may
I
david
goldwater
again
I'm
sorry,
I
left
out
there's
a
an
amendment
on
your
nellis,
the
from
clark
county
that
references,
the
tnc
statute
and
the
airport's
ability
to
continue
to
regulate.
We
we
find
that
a
friendly
amendment
from
mr
ortiz
and
would
be
happy
if
you
would
consider
it.
Should
you
see
this
as
favorable
legislation.
A
C
Thank
you,
madam
chair
david
goldwater,
again,
the
what
I
think
they're
trying
to
do
at
the
county
is
in
the
tnc
statute.
There
is
the
ability
for
that
there's
a
preemption
language
that
doesn't
allow
local
governments
to
preempt
what
the
state
does
at
their
regulatory
level.
C
Additionally,
in
that
preemption
statute,
there's
an
exclusion
for
the
airport
to
be
able
to
do
what
they
need
to
to
do
charge
fees,
requests
or
require
permits
and
licenses,
and
things
like
that
that
they
reference
that
statute
in
this
classification
to
make
sure
that,
in
this
class
of
driver
and
in
this
class
of
vehicle
that
they
still
have,
the
airport
still
has
dominion
over
over
what
happens
out
there.
G
Thank
you,
chair
monroe
moreno.
If
I
might
ask
a
question
directly
of
mr
goldwater,
is
this
amendment
by
the
airport
the
only
place
in
nevada,
revised
statute
that
needs
to
be
revised
to
deal
with
this,
because
I
know
sometimes
often
things
are
in
multiple
places.
G
C
A
A
Okay,
see
none.
I
will
ask
our
broadcast
staff
to
check
the
phone
lines
and
see
if
we
have
anyone
in
queue
who
wishes
to
supply
testimony
in
support
of
assembly
bill
444.
G
G
F
Yes,
this
is
mike
sullivan
s-u-l-l-I-v-a-n,
the
ferraro
group
representing
whittlesea
bell
and
bell
transportation.
We
are
in
full
support
of
of
ab444
and
would
like
to
go
on
the
record.
Thank
you.
A
G
A
Thank
you.
Do
we
have
any
callers
in
the
queue
to
offer,
testimony
in
the
neutral
on
assembly,
bill
444.
A
Thank
you
so
much
mr
goldwater
or
mr
burton.
Would
you
like.
C
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
We
appreciate
you
in
the
committee's
time
today
if
we
can
get
on
work
session,
that
would
be
tremendous.
B
I
apologize
when
david
first
started
it
it
got
caught
in
a
loop
where
I
was
hearing
his
opening
remarks,
just
it
just
kept
looping
back.
So,
as
you
guys
were
asking
me
questions
I
had
that
going
on
at
the
same
time
and
I
couldn't
couldn't
get
it
clear
cleared
out.
So
I
just
was
with
tech
and
they
just
hooked
me
back
in
so
I
apologize.
A
That
is
quite
all
right.
You
have
any
other
information
you'd
like
to
share,
and
I
believe
assemblyman
wheeler
has
a
question
for
you,
mr
burton.
A
Okay,
I'm
not
seeing
any
questions
for
you,
mr
burton
bps
staff.
I
just
received
a
message
from
mr
ortiz
from
clark
county.
He
said
that
he
is
waiting
to
make
a
comment
on
the
phone
lines.
Do
you
see
anyone
on
our
phone
lines.
G
H
Now,
all
right
great,
thank
you.
I
am
so
sorry,
chairman
royal
moreno
members
of
assembly,
growth
and
infrastructure
committee.
My
name
is
alex
ortiz
a-l-e-x-o-r-t-I-z,
representing
clark
county.
I
want
to
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
today
and
again
I
do
apologize
for
technical
difficulties
on
my
end,
trying
to
get
through
on
this
and
not
being
on
on
video
as
well.
Today,
clark
county
is
neutral
on
this
on
this
bill,
but
we
do.
We
did
propose
an
amendment
that
mr
goldwater
spoke
to
and
it
is
on
ellis
as
well.
H
I
want
to
thank
mr
goldwater
for
accepting
our
amendments
and
considering
them
friendly
as
well.
H
Our
amendment
to
subsection
one
and
four,
as
you
can
see
on
nellis,
essentially
ensure
that
the
agreements
between
a
transportation
network
company
and
the
limousine
motor
carrier
mirror
those
of
the
tnc
regulations
in
706,
a
.310,
so
you'll
see
on
second
page
those
two
subsections
of
section
five
and
where
we've
added
subject
to
the
provisions
of
nrs
706
8.310,
that
subsection
in
706
8.310,
specifically
specifically
talks
about.
H
Like
mr
goldwater
talks
mentioned
the
preemption
language,
but
it
also
talks
about
in
subsection
two
in
part
that
it
requires
a
tncu
or
a
driver
to
obtain
a
local
government
business
license
or
pay
a
business
license
fee,
and
then
it
also
requires
a
tnc
or
a
driver
to
obtain
a
permit
or
certification
to
operate
at
the
airport,
pay
a
fee
to
operate
at
the
airport
or
comply
with
any
other
requirement
to
operate
at
the
airport,
and
this
is
also
true
and
the
same
for
taxis,
limousine
carriers
and
the
tnc's
that
operate
through
the
airport.
H
A
You
thank
you
so
much
and
I'm
sorry
about
the
technical
difficulties,
but
I'm
able
you
were
happy.
You
were
able
to
get
through
so
members.
I
am
not
seeing
any
other
questions
from
the
members,
so
I
know
there
was
a
motion,
so
I
will
go
ahead
and
entertain
that
motion,
so
you
can
say
it
since
I
cut
you
off,
I
simply
go
ahead.
A
We
have
a
first
a
motion
to
amended
due
pass
from
assemblyman
wheeler,
second
from
assemblywoman
brown
may
and
in
the
interest
of
time
members
any
discussion
before
we
go
to
the
vote.
A
Thank
you,
members,
I'm
going
to
ask
you
to
turn
your
cameras
on
and
instead
of
doing
the
roll
call
vote.
I'm
just
going
to
ask
all
in
favor
say.
A
Thank
you,
and
with
that
we
will
close
the
hearing
on
assembly
bill
444
on
our
original
agenda.
For
today
there
was
another
bill
assembly
bill
423
that
bill
has
been
pulled.
It
will
not
have
a
hearing
today.
If
you
were
here
for
that
bill
hearing,
I
am
so
sorry.
We
will
not
be
hearing
that,
though
today
and
with
that
members.
I
believe
you,
I'm
hoping
you
printed
or
at
least
pulled
up
on
your
computers.
A
I
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
for
the
record
katie
seaman,
s-I-e-m-o-n
committee
policy.
Analyst
assembly
bill
301,
was
first
heard
on
march
25th
2021
before
this
committee.
It
requires
tow
car
operators
to
immediately
release
a
vehicle
to
its
owner's
possession
at
no
charge
if
the
tow
is
from
a
residential,
complex
for
a
lack
registration
or
an
expired
registration
and
the
owner
is
able
to
provide
evidence,
a
valid
vehicle
registration
that
predates
the
tow.
I
The
measure
requires
a
private
property
owner
who
requests
the
toe
of
a
vehicle
from
a
residential
complex
to
make
reasonable
efforts
to
notify
the
owner
or
operator
of
a
vehicle
that
it
may
be
towed,
including
by
electronic
electronic
mail,
address
sorry
or
telephone
further.
It
requires
tow
car
operators
to
independently
verify
the
registration
status
of
a
vehicle
before
towing
the
vehicle
from
a
residential,
complex
for
lack
of
registration
or
expired
registration,
and
retain
proof
of
this
verification.
I
I
There
have
been
several
amendments
proposed
by
this
measure's
primary
sponsor
assembly
members,
sarah
peters,
chandra,
summers,
armstrong
and
howard.
Watts
iii
shall
be
added
as
non-primary
sponsors
in
sections
one
and
two.
The
attached
amendment
permits
vehicle
owners
to
provide
proof
of
current
registration
status
with
either
a
physical
or
an
electronic
record
instead
of
the
fifty
dollar
maximum
fee
referenced.
I
In
section
two
of
the
bill,
the
amendment
requires
the
nevada,
transportation
authority
or
nta
to
implement
a
program
that
will
allow
vehicle
owners
facing
financial
hardship
to
apply
and
be
granted
the
ability
to
pay
a
reduced
tariff
rate
determined
by
the
nta
to
recover
their
vehicles
from
a
storage
yard.
The
amendment
review
removes
from
the
mandatory
provisions
of
the
bill
those
provisions
relating
to
toes
for
a
lack
of
registration.
I
A
A
See
none.
We
will
do
a
group
vote
all
in
favor
say
yes,.
B
A
Would
you
raise
your
hand,
and
so
I
can?
We
have
assemblyman
wheeler
and
assemblyman
ellinson.
G
A
So
yes,
so
we
have
two
members,
no
assemblyman
wheeler
and
a
sibling
ellison.
All
other
members
of
the
committee
are
a
yes.
The
motion
passes
and
I
will
assign
that
for
statement
to
assemblyman
miller
and
before
we
move
on
to
our
next
bill.
On
our
work
session,
I
failed
to
assign
the
for
statement
for
assembly
bill
444.
A
I
Measure
you,
madam
chair,
for
the
record,
katie
seaman
committee
policy.
Analyst
assembly,
bill
349,
provides
that
any
vehicle
which
has
been
issued
a
special
license
plate
and
registration
as
an
old-timer
vehicle
street
rod,
classic
rod
or
classic
vehicle
must
not
be
used
for
general
transportation
and
may
only
be
used
for
club
activities.
Exhibitions
tours
parades
or
similar
activities
or
other
uses
necessary
for
the
operation
and
maintenance
of
the
vehicle,
and
they
must
be
covered
by
either
an
endorsement
or
insurance
that
is
designed
or
designated
specifically
for
classic
or
antique
vehicles
on
an
annual
basis.
I
The
measure
authorizes
the
dmv
to
establish
remote
emission
sensing
systems
to
test
vehicles
driven
along
highways
and
counties
with
populations
of
100
000
or
more.
The
dmv
shall
enact
regulations
to
carry
out
the
remote
sensing
system,
determine
participation,
requirements
and
fees
and
provide
for
data
collection,
use
and
sharing
with
other
state
agencies.
I
This
bill
prevents
the
state
environmental
commission
from
issuing
a
waiver
of
compliance
with
vehicle
emission
standards
if
a
vehicle
is
repaired
by
its
owner
and
defines
such
repair
efforts.
Finally,
ab349
increases
fees
for
license,
renewals
and
forms
for
authorized
inspection
stations,
authorized
stations
or
fleet
stations.
I
There
has
been
one
conceptual
amendment
provided
by
the
bill,
sponsor
that
proposes
to
strike
section
two
and
a
man
amends
section
subsection,
10
of
sections,
1,
subsections,
11,
subsection,
11
of
section
3
and
subsection
11
of
section
4
to
read
quote
as
used
in
this
section.
General
transportation
means
a
vehicle
that
is
driven
more
than
5
000
miles
during
the
immediately
proceeding
year
or
used
in
any
capacity
for
commercial
purposes.
End
quote:
the
amendment
makes
changes
to
subsection.
I
Two
pardon
me:
I'm
nevada,
revised
statutes,
445
b
dot
767
to
have
the
dmv
collect
a
fee
equal
to
the
fee
for
reform
certifying
emissions
control,
compliance
subsection,
three
of
section
nine
will
exempt
new
vehicles
from
emissions
testing
until
their
fourth
registration
instead
of
fifth
and
the
language
proposed
in
subsection,
four
of
section
nine
shall
read
at
the
beginning
quote:
the
commission
shall
provide
a
waiver
end
quote
in
section
10.
The
annual
station
license
fee
is
now
one
hundred
dollars
and
the
form
certifying
emission
control.
I
Compliance
is
now
eight
dollars
and
fifty
cents,
nevada,
revised
statutes,
section
482.2655
is
retained
in
this
amendment
and
the
effective
dates
of
ab349
are
changed
to
january
1,
2022
for
the
provisions
of
section
10
and
january
1
2023
for
sections
1,
3
and
4..
The
measure
requires
a
two-thirds
majority
vote.
There
have
been
two
fiscal
notes
received
for
ab349.
I
The
division
of
environmental
protection
within
the
state
department
of
conservation
and
natural
resources
has
determined.
There
is
no
fiscal
impact.
The
pollution
control
unit
within
the
compliance
enforcement
division
of
the
dmv
has
provided
a
fiscal
note,
indicating
that,
as
introduced,
ab349
would
result
in
increased
revenue
over
the
upcoming
biennium.
However,
it
notes
that
this
assumes
that
current
workload
may
be
absorbed
by
existing
staff.
If
additional
staff
are
required
to
facilitate
programming
under
this
measure,
additional
funds
may
be
required.
Thank
you.
A
A
I
have
a
first
from
assemblyman
miller
and
this
second
peters
assemblywoman
peter
seconds.
The
motion,
any
discussion
on
the
motion.
A
Okay,
see
none
members
all
in
favor
of
the
motion.
Please
say
yes,
yes,
yes,
any
in
opposition
oppose
the
motion.
No,
can
you
raise
your
hand,
and
I
will
call
you
out
for
the
committee
secretary
we
have
discipline.
Levitt
is
a
no
assemblyman.
Roberts
is
a
no
assemblyman.
Wheeler
is
a
no
and
assemblyman.
Ellinson
is
a
no.
A
That
doesn't
count
here
today.
No
I'm
so
sorry.
So
with
that
vocal,
the
motion
does
pass
and
I
will
assign
the
for
statement
to
assemblyman.
A
I
I
It
removes
any
authorization
or
requirement
in
law
for
the
department
of
motor
vehicles
or
dmv
to
issue
license
plate
registration,
decals,
stickers
and
tabs,
and
any
requirement
for
owners
of
vehicles
registered
in
nevada
to
display
license
plate
registration,
decals,
stickers
or
tabs.
There
has
been
one
amendment
submitted
by
the
measure
sponsor
which
repeals
the
bill
text
as
introduced
with
the
exception
of
section
2..
Additionally,
the
amendment
would
require
the
department
to
adopt
regulations
which
would
allow
short-term
lessors
to
issue
license
plates
for
their
vehicles.
I
There
has
been
one
unsolicited
fiscal
note
received
from
the
office
of
project
management
management
within
the
dmv
related
to
the
measures
introduced,
as
the
fiscal
note
is
dependent
on
the
elimination
of
registration
decals
and
the
amendment
submitted
repeals
the
language.
This
fiscal
note
would
no
longer
apply
after
amendment.
Thank
you.
A
F
Thank
you
very
much,
ma'am
chair
it
so
in
in
the
hearing
you
know
I
was
initially
supportive,
as
I
did
some
research
out
of
the
three
states
that
do
not
have
stickers,
or
at
least
one
of
the
states
was
pennsylvania
that
switched
in
2017
as
a
result
of
the
change.
They
lost
51
million
dollars
of
revenue
and
they
are
now
switching
back.
They
just
passed
a
bill
this
spring,
so
out
of
concerns
for
the
loss
of
revenue.
I
won't
be
supporting
this
measure
today.
A
H
Yes,
thank
you,
simon
c.h
miller.
Yes,
so
the
way
the
bill
the
bill
has
pretty
much
been
gutted
and
only
we're
retaining
the
plate.
The
the
space
that
would
allow
short-term
lessors
of
vehicles
to
self-plate
their
vehicles
when
they
get
new
vehicles
and
the
reason
that
this
part
of
the
bill
has
remained
is
because
right
now,
there's
a
gap
that
happens
when
a
fleet
when
they
get
new
cars.
They
get
this.
You
know
10
day
or
the
small
permit.
That
goes
in
the
front
window.
H
So
by
maintaining
this
portion
of
the
legislation,
it
would
allow
them
to
immediately
put
a
license
plate
on
the
vehicle.
So
at
no
point
when
the
vehicle
is
rented
out,
would
someone
be
subject
of
a
probable
cause
stop
simply
because
they
don't
have
a
license
plate?
So
this
was
something
that
I
really
wanted
to
hold
on
to
and
I'm
I'm
grateful
that
I
was
able
to
so.
I
would
appreciate
any
support
I
could
get
on
that.
Thank
you.
F
B
Yes,
yes,
ma'am
and-
and
I
really
like
that-
the
the
change
in
that,
but
we
never
got
the
amendment
that
so
I'll
go
back
and
check,
but
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
vote
yes,
but
I'll
reserve,
my
right
because
our
biggest
concern
was
was
the
sticker
and
and
so
I
I
appreciate
that,
and
and
I
will
vote
yes
and
and
I'll
reserve
my
right
until
I
see
the
amendment
I
haven't
seen
it.
Thank
you.
A
Assimilation,
if
you
were
able
to
print
up
your
work
session
documents,
the
amendment
is
on
the
back
side
of
the
the
work
session
page
for
this
bill
for
379..
There.
B
A
B
A
I
I
It
provides
for
definitions
of
terms
related
to
the
energy
efficiency
of
appliances,
and
it
requires
the
director
of
the
office
of
energy
within
the
office
of
the
governor
to
adopt
regulations
for
prescribed
minimum
standards
as
standards
of
energy
efficiency
for
certain
appliances
and
develop
methods
for
testing
compliance
with
these
standards.
The
measure
prohibits
the
sale,
lease
rental
or
installation
of
a
new
appliance
that
does
not
meet
these
standards
after
certain
dates
and
excludes
certain
appliances
from
these
requirements.
I
If
the
director
of
the
office
of
energy
intends
to
adopt
a
standard
of
energy
efficiency
for
an
appliance
that
is
more
stringent
than
the
energy
efficiency
standard
under
federal
law,
he
or
she
shall
seek
a
waiver
of
preemption.
From
the
secretary
of
energy
of
the
united
states
department
of
energy,
the
director
is
required
to
adopt
regulations
prescribing
the
procedures
for
certifying
and
labeling
appliances
and
ab-383
prohibits
manufacturers
from
making
appliances
available
for
sale
that
have
not
obtained
certification
from
the
director
that
the
appliance
meets
established
energy
efficiency
standards.
I
The
director
is
authorized
to
test
appliances
for
compliance
with
established
energy
efficiency
standards
and
conduct,
periodic
compliance,
inspections
of
the
premises
of
manufacturers,
distributors,
retailers
and
installers
of
new
appliances
and
newly
constructed
buildings
containing
new
appliances.
The
director
shall
investigate
complaints
of
alleged
violations
for
of
the
provisions
of
ab383.
I
I
There
has
been
one
amendment
proposed
by
the
primary
sponsor
to
eliminate
section.
33
regarding
federal
waivers
and
it
rewrites
section
34
to
require
manufacturers
to
provide
proof
of
energy
star
or
other
certification
from
their
product
testing
to
the
office
of
energy
to
demonstrate
compliance
rather
than
requiring
certification
to
be
obtained
from
the
director.
It
also
removes
the
prescriptive
consultation
in
the
rulemaking
process,
as
well
as
the
office's
ability
to
independently
test
appliances
and
conduct
periodic
inspections.
I
The
amendment
also
allows,
rather
than
requires
the
investigation
of
complaints
and
provides
that
a
first-time
violation
would
receive
a
warning
instead
of
a
civil
penalty.
Finally,
it
moves
the
effective
date
to
july
1
2023,
to
provide
ample
time
for
rulemaking
and
for
manufacturers
and
others
to
adjust
inventory.
I
There
has
been
one
fiscal
note
received
from
the
office
of
energy
describing
the
fiscal
impact
on
future
biennia.
The
fiscal
note
was
submitted
in
response
to
the
bill
is
introduced
and
representatives
from
the
office
of
energy
stated
that
they
would
remove
this
fiscal
note.
Should
ab
383
proceed
with
the
amendment
proposed?
Thank
you.
A
B
I'm
sure
can
I
say
something:
real,
quick.
G
Thank
you
two
quick
things.
I
don't
know
if
I
sent
the
did
not
send
the
latest
version
of
the
amendment,
but
there
are
some
additional
tweets
that
we're
gonna
have
to
make
so,
and
I
have
we've
also
been
working
a
lot
with
southern
nevada,
home
builders
and
other
stakeholders
to
address
their
concerns,
and
it
looks
like
some
of
those
might
not
be
in
the
version
that
we've
got
in
the
work
session
document
it
may
be
have
been
because
I
sent
this
late
at
night
after
working
on
it.
G
There
was
some
concern
that
the
governor's
office
of
energy
would
incorporate
the
provisions
of
this
bill
into
the
iecc
and
that
the
the
office
indicated
that
that
would
not
be
the
case.
So
I
just
want
to
get
that
on
the
record
that
we
appreciate
the
engagement
of
different
stakeholders
in
the
process
and
we
are
at
a
point
where
we
can
get
changes
made
that
address
all
the
concerns
that
have
been
brought
up
to
this
point.
A
Thank
you
for
sharing
that
and
thank
you
for
continuing
to
work
with
the
stakeholders
to
get
the
legislation
to
where
everyone
can
be
at
a
more
acceptable.
If
not
happy
point
assemblyman
roberts.
F
Thank
you
ma'am
chair,
and
I
appreciate
the
sponsor
of
the
bill
working
with
the
folks
that
had
issues
with
it.
I
I
look
forward
to
whatever
floor
amendment.
We
can
get
it
to
a
place
where
we
can
be
I'll,
be
yes
out
of
the
committee
today,
but
obviously
I
need
to
see
that
so
reserve
my
right
case.
It
doesn't
get
where
we
need
it
to
be,
but
let's
now
I'll
support
it
moving
it
today.
F
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I
kind
of
want
to
say
ditto
to
what
my
colleague
said,
but
I
will
be
no
out
of
committee
and
we'll
see
if
we
can
get
it
to
where
the
builders
are
happy
and
we
can
get
it
to
where
we
think
it's
a
good
bill
and
would,
if
I,
but
if
I
do
change
my
vote
on
the
floor.
Madam
chair,
I
will
let
you
know
prior.
D
I'm
in
the
same
boat,
I'll
vote,
yes
out
of
committee,
but
until
the
issues
are
resolved
I'll
I'll
reserve.
My
right,
thank
you.
B
A
Thank
you,
and
as
far
as
the
amendment
for
this
one,
there
was
one
attached
to
the
the
work
session
document,
but
I
believe
one
of
the
sponsors
of
the
bill
said
that
he
had
not
submitted
his
final
language,
but
we
will
be
seeing
that
on
the
floor.
So
so
with
that
members,
I
don't
see
anyone
else
raising
a
hand
for
further
discussions.
A
I
assembly
bill
388
replaces
the
definition
of
broadband
service
in
existing
law
includes
broadband
service
within
the
existing
definition
of
telecommunication
and
makes
conforming
changes.
The
measure
requires
the
public
utilities,
commission
of
nevada
or
pucn
to
establish
a
program
to
assist
persons
with
low
income
in
obtaining
access
to
broadband
services.
I
The
program
must
require
certain
providers
of
telephone
service
to
provide
a
reduction
in
rates
for
telephone
services
to
certain
low-income
customers,
to
ensure
access
to
broadband
services
for
such
customers
and
must
enable
providers
to
be
reimbursed
the
amount
of
this
reduction
in
rates
from
the
fund
to
maintain
the
availability
of
telephone
service.
The
bill
extends
the
provisions
governing
certain
reductions
and
rates
for
the
telephone
rates
to
apply
to
reduction
in
rates
required
by
this
broadband
access
program.
I
The
definition
provided
for
by
this
measure
and
three
create
a
broadband
ready
community
certification
program
to
encourage
local
governments
to
adopt
policies
that
expand
broadband
infrastructure.
There
has
been
one
fiscal
note
received
from
the
pucn
indicating
an
expense
in
future
biennia,
as
the
measure
will
require
additional
staffing.
Thank
you.
A
A
H
A
A
I
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
for
the
record
katie
seaman
committee
policy.
Analyst
assembly
bill
411,
was
first
heard
yesterday
before
this
committee.
It
requires
that
the
regulations
adopted
by
the
state
board
of
agriculture
within
the
state
department
of
agriculture
for
motor
fuel
allow
the
sale
of
motor
vehicle
fuel
containing
not
more
than
15
ethanol
by
volume.
I
There
has
been
one
amendment
proposed
by
the
bill,
sponsor
that
would
change
the
effective
date
of
section
one
of
the
bill
from
january
1,
2022
to
july
1,
2022
for
all
purposes
other
than
the
adoption
of
regulations
and
other
preparatory
administrative
tasks.
There
were
two
fiscal
notes
received
for
the
measures
introduced.
If
the
proposed
amendment
is
adopted,
there
will
be
no
fiscal
notes
associated
with
this
measure.
Thank
you.
A
B
A
A
A
I
You,
madam
chair
katie,
seaman
for
the
record
committee
policy.
Analyst
assembly
bill
412
review,
revises
provisions
governing
motor
vehicles.
It
was
first
heard
before
this
committee
yesterday
april,
8
2021
assembly
bill
412
defines
a
neighborhood
occupantless
vehicle,
as
quote
a
low-speed
vehicle
that
is
not
designed
intended
or
marketed
for
human
occupancy.
End
quote:
operation
of
such
a
vehicle
on
a
roadway
with
a
speed
limit
greater
than
35
miles
per
hour,
but
less
than
45
miles
per
hour
is
in
compliance
with
state
law.
I
If
the
operator
complies
with
certain
speed
restrictions
and
equipment
requirements
for
motor
vehicles,
the
measure
extends
certain
requirements
applicable
to
drivers
of
low-speed
vehicles
to
extend
to
operators
of
such
vehicles
and
exempt
certain
autonomous
vehicles
operated
exclusively
by
an
automated
driving
system
from
provisions
requiring
equipment.
A
fully
autonomous
vehicle
that
is
exclusively
operated
by
an
automated
driving
system
is
exempted
from
requirements
for
mirrors
to
reflect
to
the
driver
review
of
the
highway
windshield
wipers
equipment
to
illuminate
with
multiple
beams
and
a
muffler.
Unless
the
vehicle
contains
an
internal
combustion
engine.
I
A
B
Yeah,
just
one
ma'am:
yes,
I
believe
in
these
little
cars
I
think
eventually
they're
going
to
have
a
great
place
in
our
economy.
Right
now,
there's
taxi
cab,
drivers
and
uber
drivers
depend
on
on
them
them
to
pick
up
and
deliver
to
a
lot
of
people
with
this.
I
just
think
it's
going
to
be
putting
a
lot
of
people
out
of
work,
so
I'm
going
to
be
a
no.
B
A
A
I
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
for
the
record
katie
seaman
committee
policy.
Analyst
assembly,
bill.
413
413
requires
the
department
of
transportation
to
establish
an
advisory
working
group
to
study
certain
issues
related
to
transportation
during
the
2021
through
2022
interim
was
first
heard
before
this
committee
yesterday
april
8
2021
assembly
bill
413
requires
nevada's
department
of
transportation
or
ndot
to
establish
an
advisory
working
group
to
study
certain
issues
related
to
transportation.
I
During
the
upcoming
interim,
the
measure
prescribes
the
membership
and
duties
of
the
working
group
and
provides
for
the
compensation
of
its
legislative
members
and
the
travel
and
per
diem
allowance
of
for
all
working
group
members.
The
department
shall
submit
a
written
report
describing
the
activities,
findings,
conclusions
and
recommendations
of
the
working
group
for
transmittal
to
the
82nd
session
of
the
nevada
legislature.
I
There
are,
there
are
several
amendments
requested
by
stakeholders
which
have
been
approved
by
assemblywoman
danielle
monroe,
moreno,
chair
of
the
assembly
committee
on
growth
and
infrastructure.
The
first
eliminates
the
provision
for
compensation
for
legislative
members
of
the
working
group
and
the
travel
and
per
diem
allowance
for
all
members.
The
second
request,
the
addition
of
members
from
local
chambers
of
commerce
and
the
nevada
resort
association,
based
upon
an
amendment
submitted
by
the
department,
assemblywoman
monroe
moreno,
has
also
requested
the
following
amendments.
The
working
groups
will
have
a
minimum
of
20
and
no
more
than
30
members.
I
The
members
of
the
working
group
must
be
representative
of
the
various
geographic
areas
and
ethnic
groups
of
the
state.
There
have
been
two
fiscal
notes
submitted
for
this
measure.
As
introduced
the
nevada
department
of
transportation
determined.
There
was
no
fiscal
impact.
Well,
the
legislative
council
bureau
was
unable
to
determine
a
specific
fiscal
impact,
but
I
would
note
that
that
was
related
to
the
per
diem,
travel
and
compensation
of
members,
so
with
amendment
that
would
likely
not
be
subject
to
a
fiscal
note.
Thank
you.
B
A
The
motion
passes
unanimously
and
I
will
assign
that
force
statement
to
assemblywoman
summers,
armstrong
members
believe
it
or
not.
We
are
up
to
our
last
item
on
our
agenda
for
work
session
and
that
is
assembly
bill
429,
which
establishes
provisions
governing
peer-to-peer
car
sharing
programs.
I
invite
our
community
policy
analysts
to
discuss
the
measure.
I
I
Additionally,
a
program
may
not
accept
an
individual
who
does
not
possess
a
valid
driver's
license.
If
an
insurance
policy
has
lapsed
or
does
not
meet
the
requirements
in
law,
the
peer-to-peer
car
sharing
program
assumes
liability
for
damages
up
to
the
required
level
of
coverage,
and
the
measure
authorizes
an
insurer
to
exclude
from
the
coverage
claims
afforded
under
a
shared
vehicle
owner's
motor
vehicle
liability
insurance
policy.
I
Peer-To-Peer
car
sharing
programs
are
required
to
make
certain
disclosures
to
share
vehicle
owners
and
drivers
and
to
maintain
certain
records.
Nothing
within
ab429
is
to
be
construed
to
impose
liability,
which
is
inconsistent
with
federal
law
governing
vicarious
liability
for
harm
found
at
united
states
code
chapter
49,
subsection,
301.06
insurers,
who
defend
or
indemnify
certain
claims
are
authorized
to
seek
recovery
from
motor
vehicle
insurers
of
the
peer-to-peer
car
sharing
programs.
In
certain
circumstances,
peer-to-peer
car
sharing
programs
have
an
insurable
interest
in
a
shared
vehicle.
I
I
The
measure
clarifies
that
sharing
a
vehicle
through
a
peer-to-peer
car
sharing
program
is
not
considered
a
lease
and
those
engaging
in
such
a
program
do
not
meet
the
definition
of
a
short-term
lessor
within
existing
law.
There
has
been
one
proposed
amendment
which
would
number
one
alter
certain
definitions
and
terms
related
to
peer-to-peer
car
sharing.
Number
two
provide
that
the
peer-to-peer
car
sharing,
program's
insurable
interest
in
the
shared
vehicle
does
not
impose
a
requirement
for
the
program
to
maintain
the
insurance
coverage,
which
is
required
for
the
shared
vehicle
and
number
three.
I
An
airport
is
not
prohibited
from
requiring
a
program
to
pay
a
fee
to
operate
at
the
airport.
An
additional
proposed
amendment
would
number
one
increase
insurance
limits
for
bodily
injury
or
death
of
one
person
in
any
one
crash
from
twenty
five
thousand
to
fifty
thousand
dollars
number
two
increase
insurance
limits
for
bodily
injury
or
death
of
two
or
more
persons
in
any
one
crash
from
fifty
thousand
to
one
hundred
thousand
dollars.
I
Number
three
revise
the
record
retention
period
for
peer-to-peer
car
sharing
services
from
four
to
six
years.
Number
four:
add
claimants
alleging
damages
related
to
the
use
of
the
shared
vehicle
to
the
list
of
persons
who
can
request
these
records
and
number
five
revise
language
related
to
airports,
as
provided
in
the
first
amendment.
I
The
measure
requires
a
two-thirds
majority
vote
and
there
have
been
two
fiscal
notes
received
the
office
of
project
management
within
the
dmv
estimated
staffing
costs
of
approximately
126
734
000
during
fiscal
year
2021
through
2022,
while
the
department
of
taxation
determined
there
is
no
fiscal
impact
from
the
measure
is
introduced.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I
just
want
to
thank
the
sponsors
for
that
second
amendment
about
the
insurance
coverage.
I
was
a
little
concerned
about
that
and
I
just
think
we
need
to
make
sure
if
we're
operating
these
sort
of
things,
we
have
adequate
coverage
because
when
there's
not
adequate
coverage,
we
as
the
taxpayers
end
up
footing
the
bill
for
that.
So
just
want
to
thank
the
sponsors
and
I
will
enthusiastically
support
the
bill.
F
Thank
you
ma'am.
The
amendments
make
it
good.
I
know
we'll
see
this
bill
again
in
ways
and
means
because
the
physical
note
I'll
be
a
yes
today
to
get
out
of
committee,
but
preserve
my
right
later
on.
Thank
you.
D
Madam
chair
I'll
just
ditto
on
robert's
sentiment.
A
B
B
A
A
A
Thank
you
so
much
members.
I
just
want
to
tell
you
how
much
I
appreciate
your
flexibility
this
week
with
all
the
extra
hearings
late
nights,
but
I
truly
truly
truly
appreciate
our
staff.
I
think
we
were
working
until
11
30
on
a
zoom
and
then
they
stayed
up
much
longer
than
that
and
not
just
last
night,
but
a
few
nights
this
week
so
to
all
of
our
committee
staff.
You
are
amazing.
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
our
broadcast
staff.
You
have.
You
have
been
key
through
all
of
this.
Getting
people
connected.
You
all
make
us
look
good
as
legislators,
and
we
thank
you
for
that.
It
does
not
go
on
knowledge.
We
will
be
standing
recess.
We
will
have
another
floor
session.
I
do
not
anticipate
that
we'll
have
any
other
measures
coming
to
our
committee
and
so
before
we
adjourn
on
the
floor.
I
will
adjourn
this
committee
meeting
on
the
fort,
but
we
are
in
recess
until
then
and
you'll
be
happy
to
know.