►
Description
For agenda and additional meeting information: https://www.leg.state.nv.us/App/Calendar/A/
Videos of archived meetings are made available as a courtesy of the Nevada Legislature.
The videos are part of an ongoing effort to keep the public informed of and involved in the legislative process.
All videos are intended for personal use and are not intended for use in commercial ventures or political campaigns.
Closed Captioning is Auto-Generated and is not an official representation of what is being spoken.
A
A
A
Although
our
meetings
are
in
person,
we
still
have
people
who
will
be
joining
us
virtually,
and
I
welcome
you
all
here
to
the
meetings
members
will
have
their
laptops
open.
Please
don't
think
they
are
not
paying
attention.
They
are
following
along
something
that
we
learned
to
do
to
multitask
in
this
virtual
nature.
A
C
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
assembly
committee
on
growth
and
infrastructure,
my
name
is
brad
keating,
director
of
government
relations
for
the
clark
county
school
district.
I
am
excited
to
be
with
all
of
you
in
this
room
and
able
to
see
your
smiling
faces
through
those
masks,
along
with
me
today,
via
zoom,
virtually
as
leonardo
benavidez
from
the
clark
county
school
district,
as
well
as
brian
mitchell,
the
director
of
the
governor's
office
of
science,
innovation
and
technology,
or
what
we
will
consider
osit
for
the
rest
of
this
presentation.
C
As
we're
all
aware,
the
cobit
19
pandemic
has
showcased
the
need
to
create
a
more
comprehensive
system
to
improve
internet
access
for
all
students.
This
bill
will
provide
will
help
shine
a
spotlight
on
the
inequities
facing
families
throughout
the
state
and
help
us
to
ensure
that
every
nevadan
receives
the
highest
quality
education.
C
This
bill
requires
the
governor's
office
of
science,
innovation
and
technology
to
compile
information
on
student
home
internet
access
and
make
recommendations
for
improving
home
connectivity
in
collaboration
with
school
districts
across
the
state.
This
information
will
become
incredibly
valuable
to
all
of
us.
Finally,
this
bill
helps
us
quantify
the
challenges
that
we
currently
face
and
have
faced
over
the
last
year,
which
will
in
turn
make
the
solution
much
more
concrete
and
verifiable.
C
D
Thanks
brad
good
afternoon
members
of
the
assembly
committee
on
growth
and
infrastructure,
I'm
brian
mitchell,
director
of
the
governor's
office
of
science,
innovation
and
technology
or
oset.
I
will
briefly
provide
some
additional
context
on
on
this
bill
for
mosaic's
perspective.
To
us,
this
bill
is
a
is
an
equity
focused
bill.
The
cobit
19
pandemic
has
forever
changed
the
way
education.
D
It
happens
throughout
our
state
and
throughout
the
nation,
and
in
order
to
better
serve
our
students,
it's
very
important
that
we
know
who
has
access
to
the
internet
in
their
home
and
and
who
doesn't
and
also
who
is
in
need
of
a
device
in
order
to
connect
to
the
internet.
So,
as
brad
mentioned
osid,
should
this
bill
be
be
passed
and
enacted,
osid
would
do
two
things
and
in
between
those
two
things
would
be
a
role
for
the
for
districts
and
charter.
D
Then
school
districts
would
provide
that
survey
out
to
their
families
and
return
the
report
back
to
oset,
and
then
we
will
edo
said
we
will
prepare
a
report
that
has
a
gap
analysis
and
we'll
be
able
to
provide
that
information
in
even
years
to
the
interim
legislative
committees
and
in
odd
years
to
the
legislature
to
the
full
legislative
standing
bodies.
D
The
standing
committees,
as
well
as
the
governor,
in
addition
to
that
oso,
will
develop
recommendation
non-binding
recommendations
for
devices
that
students
might
procure
in
order
or
for
districts
that
they
in
order
to
ensure
that
districts
are
procuring
devices
that
meet
these
highest
standards
of
connectivity.
D
A
a
funding
recommendation
or
a
plan
for
districts
or
for
the
in
order
to
meet
the
the
needs
the
districts
have
to
connect
students
and
then
now
I
will
turn
the
the
microphone
over
to
leonardo
benavidez
from
the
school
district
to
walk
you
through
the
the
different
steps
of
the
bill.
C
And
this
is
brad
keating,
I'm
going
to
take
it
over,
since
mr
benavidez
is
testifying
in
another
committee.
So
just
so
you
know,
as
mr
mitchell
discussed.
I
think
this
is
incredibly
important
bill,
as
not
only
two
as
2020
is
fundamental,
fundamentally
shifted.
The
way
we
look
at
education,
but
one
of
the
benefits
to
this
bill,
as
you
see
in
the
last
bullet
in
front
of
you,
is
that
the
american
rescue
plan
just
allocated
7.1
billion
dollars
to
schools
and
libraries
to
connect
low-income
students
to
their
internet
from
their
house.
C
C
It
outlines
the
statewide
system
of
gathering
data
on
digital
access,
authorizes
the
governor's
office
of
science,
innovation
and
technology
to
carry
out
this
program,
and
then
section
3,
sub
1
b
allows
for
any
ferpa
compliant
information
to
be
shared
with
broadband
providers
and
public
entities
to
assist
those
in
need
of
internet
access.
This
was
an
issue
when
we
first
entered
into
the
pandemic
being
able
to
get
information
quickly
to
the
provider
so
that
we
could
connect
our
students.
C
This
portion
of
the
law
helps
us
in
order
to
move
that
in
a
much
quicker
manner.
Next
portion,
section,
3,
sub
1,
creates
minimum
non-binding
recommendations.
As
brian
said,
for
district
devices,
it's
not
going
to
focus
necessarily
on
screen
size,
but
it
will
pay
particular
attention
to
wi-fi
capability
to
help
ensure
districts
have
accessibility
to
as
many
networks
that
are
out
there.
C
Next
section,
oso
will
compile
all
that
data
to
create
the
gap
analysis
that
was
spoken
about
showing
the
number
of
students
who
are
lacking
connectivity
in
our
devices.
Then
a
fiscal
plan
will
be
developed
to
close
the
gap
and
determine
how
to
best
leverage,
any
programs
that
provide
relief
and
then,
finally,
we
not
only
the
bill
states
that
osit
will
consult
with
a
wide
variety
of
individuals,
providers,
federal
offices
and
organizations
to
make
sure
that
we
are
all
of
the
devices
work
on
as
many
capabilities
of
network
as
possible.
C
C
So
as
parents
identify
and
register
their
students,
they
will
be
asked
if
they
have
internet
at
the
home
and
then
do
they
have
a
device
for
their
student
as
well.
And
then
a
report
will
be
provided,
as
brian
said,
to
the
to
the
interim
committees,
as
well
as
the
full
body
of
the
legislature.
C
So
in
closing,
as
we've
seen,
the
landscape
of
education
has
certainly
fundamentally
fundamentally
shifted
how
and
where
our
students
are
receiving
instruction.
Even
as
we
return
to
face-to-face
instruction,
there
will
forever
be
a
subset
of
students
who
will
prefer
distance
education.
We
see
that
now
the
state
needs
to
develop
tools
to
adapt
for
the
future,
as
technology
is
rapidly
evolving
and
after
all,
today's
broadband
connection
certainly
could
be
tomorrow's
dial-up.
Madam
chair,
we're
now
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
or
the
committee
have
related
to
senate
bill
66,
and
thank
you
for
the
time.
A
E
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
thank
you,
mr
keating,
for
for
bringing
this
forward.
So
during
the
this
previous
school
year
prior
to
the
school
year,
starting
knowing
that
we
weren't
going
to
open
up
my
my
children
received
chromebooks
and
I
believe
when
they
did
receive
them,
they
were
asked
what
their
internet
capability
was
prior
to
receiving
those
chromebooks.
E
I
think
we
had
to
fill
out
a
questionnaire,
so
I
guess
my
question
is:
is
is
this?
Is
this
just?
Is
this
just
building
upon
a
current
process
that
you
guys
had
to
implement
initially,
and
you
know,
did
what
what
were
the
best
practices?
Maybe
challenges
that
you
that
you
saw
when
you
were
when
you
were
going
through
this
this
process
in
this
past
school
year?
That
can
that?
Can
that
can
give
you
comfort
in
knowing
that
this
this
bill
will
help
you
along
the
way,
when
you're
trying
to
implement
it
in
in
upcoming
years.
C
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
through
you
to
assemblyman
levitt,
brad
keating
for
the
record
representative
clark
county
school
district.
I
think,
if
anything,
what
we
have
seen
over
the
last
years,
I
don't
know
of
many
school
districts
across
the
country
that
were
prepared
to
flip
the
switch
like
we
were
forced
to
do.
C
Due
to
the
covet
19
pandemic.
We
provided
as
a
clark
county
school
district.
We
connected
approximately
19
000
students
to
the
internet
over
the
last
year,
and
we
we
deployed
over
247
000
devices
in
clark
county
school
district
alone.
It
was
a
large
task.
It
was
difficult
to
do.
We
didn't
have
enough
devices
to
start
with
when
we
began
this
process.
C
So
I
think
what
we
have
seen
and
we've
built
on
this
process
as
we've
gone
forward
right
and
ask
and
asking
that
very
question
online
or
when
somebody
checks
out
a
chromebook
that
they
were
able
to
fill
out
a
form
and
tell
us
that
they
had
internet
at
the
house.
What
this
bill
will
do
is
it
will
make
sure
that
we
know
every
single
year
moving
forward
in
the
state
of
nevada,
how
many
students
don't
have
access
to
the
internet
and
how
many
are
lacking
a
device
not
having
over
the
past
year.
C
Unfortunately,
school
districts
were
put
into
a
place
where
we
went
and
bought
as
many
chromebooks
and
devices
as
we
possibly
could,
because
there
were
only
so
many
out
there.
This
will
give
us
the
data
in
front
of
us
to
make
a
data
informed
decision
to
complete
to
replenish
our
product
when
we
need
to
and
to
make
sure
all
of
our
students
have
internet
access.
So
I
think
what
this
bill
does.
E
So
initially
was
there
a
criteria
on
on
on
which
children
received
the
chromebooks
and
and
who
was
put
maybe
on
a
waiting
list,
as
you
were
waiting
for
more
to
come
in,
and
will
this
process
also
have
a
criteria
attached
to
it
to
help
identify
those
that
are
maybe
more
in
need
versus
those
that
that
can
that
can
can
be
a
little
more
self-sustaining.
C
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
through
you,
assemblyman
levitt,
brad
keating,
for
the
record
there
when
we
first
started
this
process
a
year
ago,
march,
20th
of
last
year,
the
process
that
we
we
only
had
so
many
chromebooks
and
ipads
to
go
out,
so
we
had
to
determine
the
areas
that
they
needed
to
be
that
they
needed
to
be
put
out
in
and
what
grade
levels
first,
so
we
started
with
high
school
students
as
they
are
the
closest
to
graduating
and
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
they
were
able
to.
C
C
What
this
allows
us
to
do
is
focus
immediately
and
not
have
a
waiting
line,
not
have
a
waiting
process
that
we
will
be
able
to
get
that
information
through
the
survey
and
then
get
the
device
and
the
internet
to
the
student,
hopefully
right
when
school
begins.
So
there's
no
lack
of
instructional
time.
G
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I
have
two
questions.
The
first
is
related
to
the
the
questionnaire
you're
talking
about
having
parents
respond
to
and
how
in-depth
you
may
think.
You
will
go
to
assess
that
digital
connectivity
right
is
it
just?
Are
you
connected
to
the
internet
or
is
it?
Are
you
connected
to
the
internet?
And
what
is
your?
Your
bandwidth?
Are
you
in
a
neighborhood
that
is
on,
is
wired
in
or
are
you
in
a
hot
spot,
neighborhood
those
kinds
of
questions
and
then
access
related,
sorry
device
related?
C
D
Brian
mitchell,
for
the
record,
thank
you
for
the
question.
Assemblywoman,
peters
I'll,
take
the
first
question
first
and
I
think
you're
you're
right
on
the
you're
you're
right
on
the
mark
there,
where
I'm
simply
asking
you
know
very
general
questions,
do
you
have
connectivity
and
do
you
have
a
device
will
not
get
us
the
type
of
answers
that
we
need
in
order
to
ascertain
true
connectivity?
D
I
we
haven't
developed
the
the
survey
yet
or
the
questions
yet,
but
we'll
do
that
in
very
close
partnership
with
all
17
school
districts
and
the
state
public
charter
school
authority
to
make
sure
that
the
questions
are
asked
straddle
the
line
between
not
being
too
technical
or
overly
burdensome
for
families,
but
also
giving
us
the
answers
we
need
in
terms
of
whether
the
device
that's
in
the
home
or
whether
or
if
there
is
connectivity
in
the
home,
whether
that's
sufficient
to
facilitate
distance
learning.
D
With
regard
to
the
second
question,
regarding
the
gap
analysis,
what
we
plan
to
do
with
osid
is
once
we
get
the
information
back
from
the
school
districts.
We
will
compile
a
report
that
has
two
pieces
of
information
for
you.
First,
it'll
have
a
broken
down
disaggregated,
a
total
of
students
by
school
district
who
lack
either
connectivity
or
a
device,
and
then
we'll
also
based
on
our
work
in
consultation
with
the
school
districts.
D
We'll
also
have
a
plan
presented
to
you
and
to
the
governor
regarding
some
different
options
or
or
a
plan.
In
order
to
address
that
gap,
the
gap
may
include
funding
and
perhaps
leveraging
resources
from
the
federal
government.
It's
possible
that
school
districts
will
be
able
to
close
that
gap
on
their
own
with
resources
and
existing
infrastructure
that
they
have
themselves
and
and
it's
possible
that
there
may
be
a
state
solution
that
that
could
be
presented
in
order
to
close
that
gap.
D
G
I
love
a
good
data
bill.
Thank
you.
I
really
do
appreciate
where
you're
going
with
this,
I
just
want
to
clarify
that
ositz
report
will
include
that
that
data
or
those
connectivity
gaps
discussion
around
the
funding
needs
or
will
that
be
in
coordination
with
the
different
districts
through
the
governor's
office.
D
Brian
mitchell,
for
the
record
to
assemblywoman
peters
the.
What
what
we
anticipate
doing
is
working
in
very
close
consultation
with
the
with
the
individual
school
districts
in
order
to
come
up
with
that
plan
in
order
to
meet
the
gaps,
and
certainly
we
wouldn't
want
to
from
the
governor's
office
perspective.
We
wouldn't
want
to
propose
something
that
that
wouldn't
make
sense
for
the
school
districts.
D
So
I
think
what
you'll
see
will
be
something
that's
very
comprehensive
and
that
is
is
very
well
coordinated
across
the
the
different
levels
of
of
government
across
the
state.
G
H
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
mr
keating.
H
Beyond
the
survey
itself
or
the
paperwork
that's
filled
out,
is
there
any
kind
of
like
a
follow-up
through
it
having
three
kids,
seven
grandkids
and
a
couple
more
that
I
call
mine?
I
can
just
see
some
enterprising
young
person
saying
no
internet
at
my
house.
Can't
do
this
homework
or
it's
very
spotty.
I
can
only
do
my
homework
every
other
day.
C
Assembly
brad
keating
for
the
record
clark
county
school
district.
Yes,
so
what
we
have
done
over
the
past
year
is
we've
created
our
own
call
center
and
through
connecting
kids
nevada,
has
been
incredible
through
the
work
of
elaine
wynne
and
jim
murran,
and
the
governor's
coveted
19
task
force,
which
brian
has
been
so
helpful
on.
C
We
have
processes
in
place
so
that
when
a
student
needs
internet,
we
were
able
to
fill
out
the
initial
paperwork,
and
then
it
goes
over
to
the
service
provider
to
complete
all
of
that
paperwork.
So
in
clark
county,
for
instance,
cox
communications
has
been
a
great
partner
where
we
have
worked
with
them
through
an
mou
process
where
we
can
do
some
of
the
paperwork
and
work
with
our
families
closely,
and
then
it
transfers
to
them.
For
a
final,
you
know
flip
of
the
switch
to
turn
everything
on
okay.
Thank
you
very
much.
I
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
mr
keating,
for
that
really
great
presentation.
First,
I
want
to
say,
as
a
mom
of
a
senior
in
high
school,
this
last
year
has
been
very
difficult
for
my
family
and
he's
very
independent.
So
for
many
families
who
have
much
younger
children,
we
watch
them
go
through
some
very
difficult
times.
I
I
know
that
the
clark
county
school
district
in
particular
has
worked
very
hard
to
keep
their
students
connected,
and
I
want
to
congratulate
you
for
the
the
successful
efforts
in
in
that
way,
also
knowing
that
we
have
a
number
of
students
that
are
still
missing,
and
so
you
talked
about
19
000
students
that
we
were
able
to
reach
in
247
000
devices
that
were
deployed
is
that,
do
you
think
the
true
scope
of
of
the
students?
Have
we
contacted
everybody?
Are
there
still
students
that
we're
missing?
I
I
guess
is
number
one,
and
then
we
watched
you
very
very
flexibly
and
creatively
develop
buses,
mobile
buses,
where
kids
were
able
to
access
internet
connectivity
in
areas
where
they
could
not
otherwise,
which
was
insightful
at
the
time,
and
it
was
a
band-aid
to
help
us
through
this
very
difficult
time.
But
but
it
was
a
creative
solution.
I'm
curious
to
know
are
there
other
creative
solutions
that
you
have
addressing
those
issues
this
current
year?
Given
that
this
data
won't
be
ready
to
be
able
to
address
the
issue
long
term.
C
Thank
you
assemblywoman
for
the
question
brad
keating,
representing
clark,
county
school
district
for
the
record.
I
want
to
take
a
moment
of
personal
privilege
for
just
one
second,
to
first
start
by
congratulating
you
on
being
a
fantastic
mother
and
helping
your
son
get
to
this
point
in
his
academic
career.
C
We
should
be
incredibly
proud
of
all
of
our
students
to
not
only
get
through
this
year,
but
on
his
impending
graduation
coming
up.
So
congratulations
on
that.
C
We
have
up
to
this
point
through
the
count
connecting
kids
initiative
and
brian
could
probably
speak
a
little
more
to
this
on
how
we've
how
we
tracked
all
of
our
students.
We
did.
We
were
able
to
track
over
the
last
year
each
of
our
students
that
needed
internet
needed
internet
or
a
device
through
the
work
of
a
lot
of
you
on
this
committee
in
the
legislative
building
and
walking
door
to
door
with
flyers
in
spanish
and
english.
C
Trying
to
connect
our
students,
we
were
able
to
reach
every
student
in
the
clark
county
school
district
and
throughout
the
state
to
ensure
that
they
did
have
a
device
and
that
they
did
have
internet.
So
we've
been
able
to
solve
that
problem
for
the
current
year
that
we
are
in
that's
why
this
bill
is
important
moving
forward.
So
we
don't
have
the
issue
come
up
again
talking
about
the
mobile
buses,
so
we
had
a.
C
We
decided
to
do
a
mobile
wi-fi
setup
for
some
of
the
areas
that
don't
receive
high
quality
or
fast
internet
access.
That
was
a
great
project
throughout
the
valley
that
we
were
able
to
put
into
a
few
different
areas.
There
are
a
number
of
creative
solutions,
and
I
will
point
to.
I
will
ask
mr
mitchell
again
to
jump
in
here,
but
we
are
looking
at
through
the
generous
partnership
between
the
state
and
local
governments,
the
city
of
las
vegas,
for
instance.
C
Right
now
we
are
looking
at
the
historic
west
side
in
las
vegas
and
we
are
connecting
internet
to
each
one
of
the
each
one
of
the
traffic
polls
throughout
the
historic
west
side.
So
students
will
be
able
to
take
that
they'll
be
able
to
use
their
in
their
school
district
device
and
connect
to
the
school
district
internet.
So
they
will
go
through
the
school
district
system
so
that
there
will
be
some
sites
blocked,
but
they
will
also
have
opportunities
to
see
all
the
programming
that
they
need
to
operate
in
school.
C
So
we
are
doing
a
number
of
different
unique
initiatives
to
try
to
make
sure
internet
is
placed
where
it
needs
to
be,
and
I
would
go
to
mr
mitchell
if
he
has
anything
to
add.
D
I
know
that
the
city
of
las
vegas
has
reached
out
in
this
part
and
is
beginning
a
partnership
with
the
with
the
city
of
north
las
vegas,
to
extend
that
same
program
that
will
connect
students
for
free
to
the
to
the
school
network
through
existing
city-owned
infrastructure
in
other
parts
of
the
state.
D
We
were
also
pursuing
a
number
of
different
avenues
of
deploying
federal
resources
and
state
resources
in
order
to
broaden
and
increase
our
infrastructure
in
other
places
that
will
ensure
that
the
families
throughout
the
state
have
have
access
to
the
internet
and-
and
just
briefly
on
the
first
question
about
whether
there
are
students
that
are
still
missing
each
school
district
in
the
state
has
has
has
done
its
own
process.
D
Every
school
district
was
a
bit
different
in
terms
of
how
they
went
about
certifying
that
their
students
were
connected
and
and
but
we've
been
able
to
determine
that
every
student
in
nevada
that
was
required
to
do
distance
learning
had
access
to
the
connectivity
and
the
device
to
facilitate
that.
I
Learning,
thank
you.
Just
one
follow-up
gentleman,
I'm
curious
to
know.
I
see
the
dates
in
the
bill
for
when
you
are
going
to
execute
certain
parts
of
this
language.
How
quickly
do
you
anticipate
and
given
that
this
bill
passes
this
legislative
session?
Would
you
execute
the
initial
study
to
pursue
the
data.
C
Brad
keating
for
for
the
record
clark
county
school
district.
If
we
are
ready
to
work
session
the
bill
and
get
it
down
to
the
floor
and
vote
on
it
out
of
here,
we
will
get
working
immediately
so
the
minute
that
this
this
bill
hopefully
does
pass
through
this
committee
in
the
house
and
signed
by
the
governor.
C
We
will
work
closely
with
mr
mitchell
at
oset
so
that
we
could
have
this
survey
done
by
the
end
of
the
summer.
We
gave
ourselves
to
november
just
so
that
if
there
were
issues
that
needed
to
be
worked
out,
our
students
came
in
after
the
beginning
of
the
school
year
that
they
had
some
time
to
do
it.
But
we
certainly
will
have
the
information
for
the
upcoming
school
year.
By
the
time
the
school
year
starts.
J
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
thank
you,
mr
keating,
mr
mitchell
and
mr
benavidez,
for
your
presentation,
and
I
just
wanted
to
ask
you
all
to
give
us
a
little
clarity.
Yesterday,
when
we
spoke,
we
talked
about
a
the
meaning
of
lack
of
sufficient
speeds,
just
for
the
benefit
of
the
committee.
Mr
mitchell,
could
you
kind
of
or
or
mr
keating,
if
you
would
please
expound
upon
that,
so
that
we
are
all
clear
what
that.
D
D
D
We
follow
the
federal
communications
commission's
standard,
which
is
25
megabits
per
second
download
and
three
megabits
per
second
upload,
and
so
a
a
family
that
has
that
connection,
that
level
of
connectivity
in
their
home
or
greater
what
could
be
considered,
served
and
and
a
family
that
either
doesn't
have
internet
access
or
has
a
lower
bandwidth,
and
that
would
be
considered
unserved.
Having
said
that,
I
think
there
are.
There
are
many
families
where
there
are.
D
You
know
more
than
several
children
who
are
using
the
internet
and
and
then
often
parents
have
been
working
at
home
due
to
the
pandemic,
and
so
there
may
be
cases
where
that
25
3
does
not
might
get
a
little
slow.
If
everybody
is
is
on
zoom
at
the
same
time,
and
so
we
I
know
that
the
clark
county
school
district
has
worked
with
those
families
to
deploy
additional
hot
spots
or
additional
solutions
in
order
to
make
sure
that
everybody
is
well
connected.
J
J
How
what
is
the
range
of
those
installed
devices
and
will
that
be
able
to
handle
multiple
children
on
zoom
if
they
are,
if
there
are
more
than
one,
if
there's
more
than
one
child
and
and
how
effective
will
that
be?
If
we
are
talking
about
a
family
of
two
three
or
four
children
who
are
all
on
the
device
and
say
they,
the
the
traffic
light
is
at
j
in
washington
and
the
child
lives
at
jay,
and
I
don't
know
adam's,
you
know:
will
that
does
it?
D
Thank
you
for
the
question
brian
mitchell,
from
osid
for
the
record
the
from
what
I
don't.
I
know
the
exact
range
in
feet
of
each
of
the
antennas
that
are
being
deployed
throughout
the
city.
D
What
I
do
know
is
that
a
large
number
are
being
deployed
and
that
the
city
of
las
vegas
is
monitoring
traffic
at
on
the
on
the
network
at
each
of
the
at
each
of
the
antennas,
and
if
a
and
if
the
traffic
is
sufficient,
that
it
begins
to
approach
the
maximum
capacity,
then
they
have
committed
to
installing
additional
infrastructure
in
order
to
ensure
that
every
student
has
connectivity,
speeds
that
meet
the
minimum
requirements,
and
so
I
I
know
that
they've
been
very,
you
know,
they're
working
very
hard
to
to
deploy
sufficient
infrastructure
to
to
ensure
that.
J
Kids
have
the
right
level
connectivity,
madam
chair,
just
one
more
please
thank
you.
Are
you
all
going
to
also
continue
the
discounted
internet
program
that
we
saw
deployed
with
our
local
providers
so
that
families
could
could
access
some
subsidized
internet
service,
and
could
you
just
sort
of
for
the
edification
of
the
group
tell
them
how
folks
qualified
and
and
also
talk
to
them,
about
some
of
the
difficulties
that
showed
up
with
families
who
might
have
had
previous
balances
and
what
you
all
did
to
help
solve
that
problem?
Thanks.
C
Brad
keating
for
the
record.
I
will
start
I'll
ask
mr
mitchell
to
jump
in
as
he
worked
closely
with
the
providers
across
the
valley,
so
we
do
have
every
intention,
as
a
school
district,
to
continue
providing
that
service
so
that
we
could
help
assist
our
our
students
and
families
for
paying
for
internet.
We
have
worked.
C
I
just
wanted
to
mention
to
one
thing
previously,
so
we
have
a
great
partnership
with
cox
communications
through
their
program
when
we
talked
about
the
the
minimum
needs
of
the
students
and
the
internet
that
they,
the
megawatts
and
megabits
that
are
given.
They
currently
offer
double
what
the
fcc
definition
is
of
high-speed
internet.
If
we've
run
into
issues
where
people
have
gone
over,
teachers
have
gone
over,
they've
been
incredibly
helpful
in
reducing
the
fees
or
wiping
fees
for
us.
C
Mr
mitchell,
if
you
can
just
walk
through
the
process
of
the
free
and
reduced
lunch,
I
believe
it
was
an
frl
rate.
D
The
a
number
of
different
providers-
telecommunications
providers
throughout
the
state
offer
discounted
plans
to
families
that
meet
certain
criteria,
such
as
eligibility
for
free
and
reduced
lunch
or
snap
or
tanf
or
or
a
number
of
other
different
programs
and
families
can
sign
up
for
those
programs
they're
generally
about
ten
dollars
per
month
on
their
own.
D
Now,
specifically,
during
the
pandemic,
the
clark
county
school
district
had
a
work,
had
an
agreement
with
cox
communications
to
provide
internet
through
their
connect
to
compete
program,
and
that
program
was
provided
to
families
at
no
cost
to
the
family.
And
I
know
a
question
has
come
up
in
the
past
about
whether
families
had
if
a
family
had
a
past
due
balance
with
with
cox.
Would
they
still
be
able
to
get
connectivity
for
their
child
to
learn?
And
the
answer
was
yes
that
cox,
you
know,
because
the
school
district
was
was
subsidizing.
D
The
cost
of
the
internet,
the
the
any
past
balance
or
any
past
history
with
the
family
with
with
the
company,
was,
was
not
taken
into
account
and
they
were
able
to
get
connectivity
and
similar
programs
with
with
different
providers,
were
also
set
up
throughout
the
state.
D
I
also
want
to
mention
that
through
the
t-mobile
sprint
merger
settlement
that
the
attorney
general
negotiated,
the
state
also
receives
a
number
of
hot
spots
that
the
clark
county
school
district
received
an
allocation
from
that
pot
and
and
other
school
districts
as
well,
and
they
were
able
to
deploy
those
to
families
in
places
where
it
made
more
sense
to
connect
via
hotspot,
as
opposed
to
a
wired
connection.
For
example,
there
are
many
families
in
las
vegas.
D
As
I
know,
you
know
that
that
are
home,
insecure
and
and
and
are
transient,
and
so
it
made
more
sense
to
have
a
hot
spot
in
a
chromebook
that
could
travel
with
the
student
as
opposed
to
providing
something
through
cox.
And
so
there
were
a
number
of
different
solutions
that
were
considered
and
deployed
to
make
sure
that
every
family
had
the
connectivity
that
they
needed
to.
A
A
Oh,
mr
keane,
I
as
one
of
the
legislators
among
many
of
members
of
this
legislative
body
put
on
our
tennis
shoes
and
and
walked
to
knock
on
doors
and
make
sure
that
the
children
in
our
communities
across
the
state
had
internet
connection.
I
thank
you
for
working
with
us.
I
appreciate
that
I
was
looking
at,
although
this
is
not
the
fiscal
committee,
I
was
looking
at
the
fiscal
note
that
was
put
on
by
the
department
of
education
in
the
bill
as
it
was
originally
drafted.
With
the
amendments
that
were
made.
Has
that
been
addressed?
A
C
Madam
chair
brad
keating
for
the
record
representing
clark
county
school
district.
So
with
the
amendment
that
we
have
made
and
brought
forth
to
you
all
today,
that
fiscal
note
is
no
longer
applicable.
The
fiscal
note
was
placed
on
there
by
the
department
of
education,
because
the
original
intent
was
to
create
a
commission
to
discuss
this.
A
Perfect
and
then
along
the
lines
of
the
question
from
assemblywoman
brownbay
and
assemblywoman
summers,
armstrong.
You
said
that
the
the
connections
will
be
put
on
light
poles
on
the
west
side
and
I'm
sure
won't
be
every
light
pole.
But
how
will
you
be
able
to
determine
exactly
where
to
place
those
and
when
to
add
more
because
I
believe
it
was
said
that
more
would
be
added
if
the
need
arises
and
what
will
be
the
trigger
for
that
need.
Yeah.
C
Brad
keating
for
the
record
representing
ccsd,
the
partnership
with
the
city
of
las
vegas,
the
state
and
the
school
district
has
been
an
incredible
one
to
see
that
in
action,
we're
working
closely
with
them
and
other
jurisdictions
currently
to
map
out
the
valley
and
work
with
some
of
our
partners,
like
cox,
communications
and
the
different
providers,
to
figure
out
where
there
are
might
be
gaps
throughout
the
vegas,
the
southern
nevada
area
and
throughout
the
state
actually
to
determine
where
we
need
to
place
those
first.
So
we
are
working
through
that.
C
The
beauty
of
the
of
the
situation
with
this
partnership
and
mr
mitchell
discussed
it
a
little
bit
is
students
will
use
a
school
district
issued
chromebook.
C
There
will
be
the
kind
of
key
as
you'll
say
inside
the
chromebook
that
will
automatically
connect
to
that
light
poll
so
that
the
internet
is
accessible
to
them
at
all
times,
so
we
are
working
with
them
right
now.
It
is
a
pilot
currently
probably
for
about
another
six
months,
and
then
they
are
ready
to
continue
expanding
and
opening
up
from
there.
A
And
then
my
last
question
I
too
have
grandchildren
in
the
clark
county
school
district
who
were
have
chromebooks.
C
Thank
you,
madam
chair
brad,
keating
for
the
record.
Yes,
students
will
be
able
to
move
devices
from
one
spot
to
the
next.
The
only
stipulation
being,
I
guess
we
quote-
have
to
get
it
off
one
book
from
one
book
to
the
next
books
of
the
schools,
but
they
will
be
able
to
move
them
and
take
the
devices
with
them
so
that
there's
no
no
gap
in
the
instructional
time.
A
Well,
thank
you.
I
am
not
seeing
any
other
committee
members
with
questions,
so
I
will
thank
you
for
the
presentation
and
then
at
this
time
we
will
move
to
testimony
in
support
of
assembly,
bill
16
or
senate
bill
66,
and
I
believe
we
have
mr
keith
in
the
room.
K
K
Many
attributes
of
education
are
continuing
to
move
online
and
it's
important
that
we
are
proactive
right
now
to
make
sure
that
students
are
not
falling
behind
and
they're
able
to
access
all
the
learning
materials
that
they
need
on
whatever
platform
is
available
to
them
and
it's.
For
that
reason,
we
are
urging
your
support
on
sb66
and
chair
and
members.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
G
Good
afternoon
committee,
chairman
roman
reno
and
committee
members,
my
name
is
dr
brenda
pearson,
and
I'm
here
representing
the
clark
county
education
association.
Ccea
is
testifying
in
support
on
senate
bill
66
and
thanks
the
clark
county
school
district
for
bringing
this
important
bill
forth.
Nevada
has
made
progress
towards
remote
learning
when
a
device
was
placed
in
every
student's
hands,
but
the
digital
divide
continues
to
plague
our
schools.
G
Cca
fully
supports
investing
in
internet
and
telecommunications,
telecommunications
technology
for
students,
but
we
would
be
remiss
if
we
did
not
mention
that
equitable
access
moves
beyond
digital
distance
learning
into
our
education
delivery
system
within
nevada
schools,
classrooms
full
of
students
struggle
with
connectivity
to
the
internet.
Now,
even
more
than
ever,
our
public
school
classrooms
need
to
have
updated
internet
technology
to
support
student
learning.
G
Historical
underfunding
of
our
school
system
has
highlighted
the
inequities
of
our
schools,
and
we
must
ensure
equitable
access
to
education
for
all
nevada
students,
whether
they
are
at
home
or
at
school
cca,
appreciates
the
efforts
of
this
committee
and
the
clark
county
school
district
for
this
bill.
We
will
look
forward
to
doing
all
we
can
to
supporting
connecting
nevada.
Thank
you.
A
L
L
B
L-I-N-D-S-A-Y-A-N-D-E-R-S-O-N
on
behalf
of
the
washoe
county
school
district,
we
are
here
in
support
of
sb
66
and
the
work
being
done
to
address
connectivity
for
our
students.
We
know
a
portion
of
our
families
will
continue
to
choose
full
distance
learning
going
forward
and
ensuring
their
continued
ability
to
access
the
full
public
school
experience
is
critically
important.
The
partnership
with
the
office
of
science,
innovation
and
technology
has
been
critical
and
we
basically
consider
them
a
member
of
our
team.
B
L
M
Good
afternoon,
chair
monroe,
moreno
vice
chair
watts
and
committee
members
for
the
record,
my
name
is
joshua
levitt
and
that's
spelled
j-o-s-h-u-a
l-e-a-v-I-t-t
and
I'm
representing
the
society
for
information
management.
Las
vegas
chapter
in
support
for
sb-66
civ
las
vegas
is
an
organization
comprised
of
cios
industry
leaders,
educators
and
entrepreneurs
throughout
southern
nevada.
In
addition
to
bringing
exchange
of
ideas,
we
strive
to
provide
advocacy
for
important
issues
and
bringing
a
wide
range
of
strategic
forecasting
and
technology
expertise
to
serve
the
state
of
nevada
in
this
internet
age.
M
Nevada
students
need
the
connectivity
and
devices
to
access
the
abundance
of
educational
resources
for
them
to
compete
in
a
global
society,
which
is
why
we
support
the
plan
to
prescribe
osit
to
gather
data
and
coordinate
the
implementation
of
telecommunications
services
for
nevada
students.
Furthermore,
we
appreciate
the
approach
to
that
of
different
decision
making
and
providing
a
vetted
list
of
telecommunications
technology
recommendations
to
better
support
students
needs.
M
We
feel
it's
prudent
that
osip
will
collect
valuable
data
in
order
to
produce
a
gap
analysis
on
student
home
connectivity.
This
should
be
a
great
opportunity
for
the
state
of
nevada
to
apply
for
federal
funding,
to
expand
telecommunications
services
with
the
goal
to
enhance
educational
opportunities
for
our
schools.
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
testify
and
support
for
sb
66.
Thank
you.
L
M
You
craig
stevens
c-r-a-I-g
s-t-e-v-e-n-s,
representing
cox,
communications
and
thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
committee
cox,
is
in
full
support
of
sb
66
and
appreciate
the
hard
work
done
by
both
the
sponsor
and
the
governor's
office.
Sb
66
will
give
the
state
of
nevada
tools
it
needs
help.
Connect
every
student
to
the
internet
and
pandemic
has
shown
a
great
need
in
helping
to
identify
those
families
who
currently
are
unable
to
bridge
the
digital
divide
through
a
strong
public-private
partnership.
M
We
believe
sb
66
will
help
support
the
ongoing
effort
in
connecting
every
student,
no
matter
where
they
live
throughout
the
pandemic.
The
current
effort
saw
the
connection
of
over
15
000
students
by
cox,
communications
in
clark,
county
alone.
Through
our
connect
compete
program,
our
connect2b
program
provided
high-speed
internet
at
little
to
no
cost
to
families
with
speeds
well
above
the
fcc
definition
of
what's
considered
high-speed
internet.
M
Every
family
who
was
connected
was
not
subject
to
a
credit
check,
received
all
equipment
at
no
charge
and
cox
even
created
a
personalized
service
to
help
families
set
up
their
own
service.
Again.
All
of
this
was
done
at
no
cost
to
these
families.
Thanks
to
the
great
work
by
the
governor's
office
ccsd
and
the
foresight
of
this
legislature
during
the
summer
special
session
with
your
support,
sb
66
will
continue
to
build
upon
the
current
foundation.
We
have
put
in
place
cox
hopes
to
continue
this
partnership.
M
Well
beyond
the
current
school
year,
connecticump
has
existed
for
over
a
decade
and
the
program
is
not
going
away
with
the
passage
of
sb66.
This
will
further
enable
all
providers
to
reach
out
to
our
students
in
need
and
create
the
equity
when
it
comes
to
our
technic.
Our
technology
challenges
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
may.
L
B
M-A-R-Y-P-I-E-R-C-Z-Y-N-S-K-I,
here
in
support
of
senate
bill,
66
we'd
like
to
thank
dr
keating
with
the
clark
county
school
district
and
mr
mitchell
from
osek
for
all
their
work
on
this
bill.
Connectivity
is
a
problem
throughout
our
state
in
our
urban
areas,
but
also
in
our
remote
rural
areas
in
our
next
access
is
critical
for
our
students
and
so
we're
in
full
support
and
thank
everyone
for
all
the
work
they've
done
on
this
bill.
We
hope
that
your
committee
will
support
it
as
well.
Thank
you.
L
N
N
N
I
was
not
on
there
that
I
didn't
hear,
because
I
am
blind-
and
I
use
my
laptop
to
do
to
to
hear
the
survey
and
and
fill
them
out
is
that
they
should
have
one
of
the
question
was
there
was:
do
you
have
a
child
who
is
who
has
iep
that's
very
good,
but
if
one
of
them
should
say
if
a
parent
has
a
disability
and
what
type?
N
Because,
as
a
blind
parent,
my
kids
are
all
doing
very
well
they're
disabled
they're
in
the
gt
program
and
all
that,
but
it
was
very
hard
to
get
a
laptop
from
the
district
and
be
able
to
download
a
software.
That's
called
non-visual
desktop
accessible.
N
It's
a
talking
free
software
for
people
who
are
blind
to
be
able
to
use,
so
I
can
keep
track
on
my
kids
homework.
So
maybe
we
could
talk
offline.
Thank
you.
So
much.
A
L
A
C
C
A
O
O
So
number
one
in
this
bill
special
plates
recommended
or
approved
in
prior
sessions,
didn't
have
consistent
guidelines
for
design
development
specifications
and
status
changes.
This
bill
would
provide
consistency
for
all
proposed
special
plates
number
two.
The
dmv
works
with
government
agencies
that
need
license
plates
that
are
similar
to
general
issue
plates
for
safety
and
security
purposes,
so
this
bill
would
clarify
the
place
issued
to
specify
specific
agency
vehicles,
are
not
transferable
and
not
subject
to
reassurance
requirements
in
nrs
482.265.
O
number
three
vehicles
purchased
from
someone
other
than
nevada.
Auto
dealer
must
purchase
a
temporary
permit
from
the
dmv
prior
to
moving
the
vehicle.
This
creates
a
hardship
when
the
transaction
is
done
outside
of
dmv
hours.
O
H
Wheeler
you,
madam
chair,
mr
receiver,
could
you
tell
me
what
the
procedure
is
for
like
a
personalized
specialty
license
plate?
Someone
wants
their
name
or
something
on
there.
Since
this
says
the
alphanumeric
protocol.
O
Sure,
just
this
is
sean
sever
from
the
dmv.
I'm
gonna
have
april
sanborn
answer
that
question
for
me.
P
Good
afternoon
april,
sanborn
administrator
for
the
department
of
motor
vehicles,
thank
you
for
the
question.
Assemblyman
wheeler,
so
this
particular
cleanup
process
will
not
have
any
impact
or
bearing
on
our
specialty
license
plate
our
personalized
license
plate
program.
So
an
individual
would
simply
order
a
personalized
license
plate
in
the
same
manner
that
they
they
would
today.
A
A
H
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
committee
nice
to
see
you
all
get
back
to
some
semblance
order.
Briefly,
I'm
andrew
mckay
executive
director
of
the
nevada
franchise,
auto
dealers,
association
and
we're
here
in
support
of
senate
bill
60.
H
I'd
be
remiss
if
I
didn't
give
a
little
shout
out
to
mr
seaver
and
his
team
over
at
dmv
over
the
past
couple
of
years
is
the
committee
is
probably
aware
of
they've
done
yeoman's
work,
not
only
modifying
but
improving
their
processes
as
we
go
to
a
more
digitized
system,
specifically
with
respect
to
this
bill.
I
want
to
talk
very
briefly
about
section
19.5
section.
19.5
is
a
very
basic
amendment
that
extends
the
validity
of
the
time
frame
of
a
driveway
permit
to
an
out-of-state
buyer
from
15
days
to
30
days.
H
The
internet
and
remote
buying
has
grown
substantially
in
recent
years
to
the
point
that
anywhere
between
just
about
10
to
20
percent
of
all
sales
are
to
out-of-state
buyers
with
covid
is
the
committee
is
more
than
aware
of
nobody
has
been
untouched
so
being
able
to
ultimately
re-title
and
register
a
vehicle
for
an
out-of-state
buyer
when
they
take
that
car
he
or
she
to
their
respective
state
when
they
drive
it
off
a
lot
in
nevada
oftentimes.
They
run
out
of
time
and
it's
a
huge
inconvenience
for
the
consumer.
H
H
It
is
creating
a
major
pinch
from
an
inventory
standpoint
and
what
that
is
resulting
is,
is
you're,
seeing
buyers
from
literally
all
over
the
country
or
flying
into
las
vegas
and
reno,
because
they
have
a
vehicle
that
this
is
the
only
location
they
can
get
and
so
what's
happening
is,
is
they're,
then
buying
and
they're
driving
a
car
up
to
a
thousand
fifteen
hundred
two
thousand
miles
away
and
by
the
time
they
take.
J
H
A
A
L
A
O
Sean
sever
from
the
dmv.
Thank
you
chair.
No
just
thank
you.
Thank
you
to
everybody
for
your
time,
and
I
also
wanted
to
thank
mr
mckay
for
his
comments
and
let
everyone
know
that
we're
okay
with
the
amendment
he
proposed.
Thank
you.
A
O
O
Chair,
I
actually,
this
is
sean
sever
from
the
dmv.
I
forgot
my
notes:
can
I
go
grab
them
real
quick?
Oh
you
sure.
Maybe
I
just
got
them
thanks.
Molly,
okay,
good
afternoon,
chair
and
committee
member
sean
sever
again
from
the
dmv
for
the
record.
Thank
you
for
letting
us
present
sb
371
to
you
today.
O
This
is
a
revision
to
the
provisions
governing
the
mileage
pilot
program
that
the
dmv
is
required
to
conduct
to
gather
mileage
data
relating
to
certain
nevada
motor
vehicles,
including
body
type
fuel
and
weight.
These
changes
can
improve
the
reporting
and
collection
of
odometer
readings,
and
this
bill
puts
those
suggestions
forward.
O
O
A
B
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
thank
you
for
the
presentation
today.
It
seems
like
a
simple
bill.
Of
course,
it's
famous
last
words,
so
I
I
notice
on
section
two:
six
right:
you
talk
about
disclosing
information
to
insurers
and
have
you
had
insurers?
Try
to
get
that
information
from
you.
P
B
J
B
P
We
do
we
do
actually
provide
reports.
I'm
sorry
molly
london,
for
the
record.
We
do
provide
reports.
They
are
a
standard
reports
that
we
provide
to
different
industry
partners,
specific
specifically,
insurance
companies
and
other
industry
partners
received
vehicle
information,
including
the
odometer
readings.
Prior
to
the
mileage
gathering
pilot.
There
were
only
reports
on
odometer
readings
for
certain
instances
like
classic
plates
for
those
vehicles
which
are
required
to
report
and
keep
their
mileage
under
a
certain
limit.
B
B
F
Thank
you
so
much,
madam
chair,
so
my
question
is
on.
I
guess
it's
page
eight
of
the
bill
right
at
the
end
of
section
two:
it
talks
about
adopting
regulations
providing
for
an
administrative
fine
for
failure
to
comply
with
the
requirements,
and
I
understand
there
would
be
regulations
adopted.
But
can
you
shed
any
light
sitting
here
today
on
on
how
you
might
intend
to
administer
that
fine?
Would
it
be
something
that
would
be
included
on
the
invoice
that
goes
to
the
customer,
I'm
just
trying
to
get
a
sense
of
how
that
might
actually
work?
P
Thank
you
for
the
question
assemblyman
molly
lennon
for
the
record
with
the
department
of
motor
vehicles.
The
department
has
not
put
a
plan
in
place
for
collecting
an
administrative
fine
again.
This
is
a
mitigation
effort
in
order
to
moving
forward
collect
the
best
data
possible.
We
do
have
statistics
on
non-reporting
right
now
we're
at
about
a
31.93
non-reporting
rate
for
those
vehicles
that
are
reporting
odometer
readings.
P
F
Thank
you
for
that,
and
thank
you
for
the
follow-up
madam
chair
and
you
know.
Obviously
the
any
regulations
would
go
through
legislative
commission
would
have
to
be
approved,
so
we
have
that
safeguard,
but
I
guess
not
really
a
question
but
more
of
just
a
statement.
I
wanted
to
make
of
concern
that
you
know.
I
think
the
legislature
has
been
trying
really
hard
to
make
sure
people's
driver's
licenses
don't
get
suspended
for
things
not
related
to
their
driving
behavior.
F
So
I
would
just
ask
in
that
administrative
process.
If
you
could
keep
that
in
mind,
what
I
don't
want
to
see
is
people
failing
to
disclose
and
some
kind
of
administrative
fine
turns
into
a
driver's
license
suspension.
I
think
that
would
probably
go
contrary
to
what
we've
been
trying
to
do
in
the
legislature,
but
obviously
realize
this
has
a
long
way
to
go.
The
bill
hasn't
passed,
yet
the
regulations
haven't
been
promulgated
or
approved,
but
just
wanted
to
put
that
out
there
as
a
potential
concern.
A
P
Molly
lennon
molly
lennon
for
the
record
with
the
department
of
motor
vehicles.
We
actually
have
31.93
non-compliance.
A
Q
Q
P
Molly
lennon
for
the
record
department
of
motor
vehicles.
You
are
correct.
We
do
request
odometer
readings
at
every
registration
and
registration
renewal
for
vehicles
that
are
not
exempt
from
the
pilot.
However,
we
did
have
to
build
in
validations
for
situations
where
an
odometer
was
broken
or
a
an
odometer
gave
us
a
negative
reading
because
there
were
no
requirements
built
in
with
this
bill
for
penalty
for
reporting,
and
it
is
a
self-reporting
pilot
oftentimes.
These
exceptions
that
fall
on
the
report
would
be
you
know,
showing
us
a
negative
reading
or
showing
us.
P
Q
Follow-Up
now
and
then
the
other
thing
is
when
you
guys
do
the
study.
You
know
nevada's
such
a
different.
Q
Every
county
is
totally
different,
like
elko.
If
you're
going
to
go
large
shopping,
you
either
go
to
twin
falls
or
salt
lake
or
reno.
I
mean
you
travel
that
distance
and
I
do
about
800
miles
a
week
during
session.
So
I
mean
how
they
going
to
calculate
that
because
of
the
rural
areas
versus
you
know,
the
cities.
P
Molly
lennon
for
the
record,
with
the
department
of
motor
vehicles.
One
thing
that
that
we
built
into
the
report
is
is
a
list
of
footnotes
that
references,
those
sorts
of
anomalies,
so
that
those
who
use
this
data
are
aware
that
there
are
instances
where
driving
milo
the
mileage
that
shows
maybe
outside
of
the
standard
the
standard
average
driving
you're
looking
at
also
vehicles
that
may
be
sold
within
six
months
and
may
have
two
readings.
P
So
the
example
that
you
give,
along
with
many
other
scenarios,
are
outlined
in
our
footnotes
to
make
sure
that
people
are
aware.
If
we
use
these
this
information
to
calculate
an
average,
we
have
to
be
aware
that
there
will
be
differences
amongst
rural
areas
versus
the
metro
areas.
We
also
provided
a
supplemental
report
so
that
a
breakdown
can
be
seen
of
those
that
are
reporting
in
rural
counties
and
what
those
miles
look
like
compared
to
the
metro,
the
metro
counties.
Q
Q
I
think
that's
a
good
idea
that
you
give
that
to
the
insurance
companies
and
that
way
we
don't
have
to
to
go
back
and
forth
with
the
insurance
companies.
So,
as
we
reported,
I
think
that's
a
good
idea
to
give
it
to
the
to
the
insurance
companies.
P
Molly
lennon
for
the
record
with
the
department
of
motor
vehicles.
Thank
you
for
for
the
input
at
this
point
the
classic
vehicle
plates
we
haven't.
We
haven't
considered
in
the
amount
of
data
that
we've
been
looking
at
for
the
mileage
gathering
and
because
the
pilot
is
temporary,
we
did
not
address
the
classic
plate.
So
we'll
look
at
that
further
and
be
prepared
to
answer
any
other
questions.
Offline,
okay,.
A
P
Lennon
for
the
record,
you
are
correct,
chair
that
they
were
previously
receiving
any
odometer
readings
that
were
collected
and
the
majority
of
those
came
from
classic
plate
classic
rod
plates
any
that
fell
in
that
category.
A
And
with
the
changes,
this
piece
of
legislation
is
passed
that
would
not
change
the
classic
vehicle
mileage
would
still
be
given
to
the
insurance
company,
just
not
the
other
vehicles
that
inadvertently
that
my
list
was
giving
out
with
the
passage
of
the
bill
pilot
program
bill
last
session.
P
A
Pilot,
that's
problematic
for
me:
assemblyman
watts.
R
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
just
a
quick
follow-up
on
this.
So
could
you
just
give
us
a
little
bit
more
background
on
this
so
trying
to
keep
up
so
this
odometer
readings
were
gathered
and
reported
prior
to
the
enactment
of
the
pri
the
pilot
program,
and
then
we've
got
these
anecdotal
reports
of
the
additional
odometer
information
being
reported
and
used
by
insurance
companies.
R
P
Molly
lennon
for
the
record
with
the
department
of
motor
vehicles.
I
can
offer
some
clarification
there.
We
did
include
the
odometer
readings
reported
for
classic
plates
in
the
mileage
gathering
pilot.
However,
if
we
strike
the
odometer
readings
from
the
reports
received
by
insurance,
company
and
other
insurance
companies,
then
they
would
not
receive
the
classic
odometer
readings
or
the
full
mileage
gathering
odometer
readings,
but
just
for
clarification,
all
odometer
collections
are
included
in
the
mileage
gathering
project.
It
would
be,
it
would
require
programming
in
order
to
delineate
for
removal
of
the
reports.
R
Thank
you
for
that.
It
seems
like
something
that
we
need
to
have
some
additional
follow-up
conversations
on
both
in
terms
of
the
programming
needs
or
capabilities
related
to
this,
as
well
as
if
the
proposed
statutory
changes
here
need
to
be
further
delineated
to
to
draw
a
distinction
between
these
categories
of
information.
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
A
Thank
you
and
then
I
just
have
one
last
question.
In
section
two,
you
removed
recreational
vehicles
from
the
list.
Could
you
just
explain
to
the
committee
why
they
were
removed.
P
Recreational
vehicles
are
seasonal
vehicles
and,
as
was
pointed
out
earlier
at
some
points
in
the
year,
maybe
driven
you
know,
50
000
miles
and
then
not
driven
for
another
six
months.
So
it
is
anticipated
that
they
will
skew
the
data
if
used
for
averages.
P
So
the
suggestion
was
made
just
for
for
further
clarity
of
the
information
we're
providing
on
the
report
that
the
recreational
vehicles
be
removed
from
the
pilot
program
and
be
accepted
from
reporting.
A
L
A
A
S
Madam
chair
members
of
the
committee,
my
name
is
connor
kane,
I'm
testifying
in
neutral
on
senate
bill
371
on
behalf
of
copart,
which
is
a
vehicle
reseller
just
here
to
thank
the
sponsor,
and
also
mr
sever,
with
with
dmv
and
and
and
and
to
recognize
the
very
talented
and
meticulous
folks
in
legal
drafting
for
making
sure
the
language
in
in
sub
subsection
6
of
section
2
conforms
with
existing
language
in
nrs.
S
Here,
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
might
have
and
again
thank
thank
mr
mr
severance
team.
Q
Yeah
have
the
salvage
titles.
If
you
guys
went
over
this,
I
sent
you
a
copy
the
other
day,
sean
on
the
salvage
titles
that
these
these
outfit,
that
the
market
or
or
they
auction
off
vehicle
and
the
titles
automatically
come
back
salvage
versus
a
clean
title.
If
you
guys
figured
that
out.
O
Yet
sean
sarah
from
the
dmv,
we
are
still
researching
that
job
and
I'll
get
back
to
you
very
soon.
L
L
O
A
She
did
a
great
job,
thank
you
and
thank
you
for
joining
us
here
today,
members.
That
brings
us
to
the
very
last
item
on
our
agenda
for
today,
and
that
is
public
comment.
I
will
ask
our
broadcast
staff.
Do
we
have
anyone
wishing
to
provide
public
comment
and
remember
that
your
comments
need
to
be
in
line
with
the
interest
of
this
committee?
However,
no
testimony
on
any
of
the
bills
that
were
presented
today.
We
are
past
testimony
phase.
L
T
A
lot
of
these
problems
and
bills
has
to
do
with
our
car
culture,
and
I
want
to
really
talk
about
how
our
cities
are
heavily
designed
to
encourage
car
use
and
discourages
pedestrian
and
transit
use.
I
watched
a
lot
of
videos
on
how
amsterdam
plans
their
cities
and
I
think,
there's
a
lot
of
things
that
we
can
certainly
learn
from
it
and
there's
a
lot
of
things
we
can
learn
from
the
old-fashioned
cities.
T
T
The
system
that
allows
a
lot
of
traffic
to
feed
in
these
high-capacity
arterial
roads,
which
are
very
dangerous
and
dysfunctional.
Like
the
saharas,
the
rainbows,
the
craigs
et
cetera
the
cul-de-sacs,
the
large-scale
single-use
zoning
that
separates
everything
the
system
is
very
costly
for
our
private
and
public
budget.
T
It's
surprisingly
and
disgustingly,
however,
that
despite
the
fact
that
las
vegas
is
one
of
the
most
co-dependent
societies
on
earth,
it's
the
fifth
densest
urban
area
in
the
country,
just
behind
new
york
city
and
more
dense
than
chicago
and
boston.
Yet
those
folks
on
average
they
transit
and
walk
a
lot
more
than
we
do.
And
now
what
we
want
to
preserve
is
the
high
rate
of
single-family
home.
N
T
What
we
don't
want,
what
we
don't
want
is
the
fact
that
we
have
all
this
car
dependency
and
those
areas
certainly
have
different
types
of
transportation.
I
think
we
should
also
take
advantages
of
roundabouts
that
are
a
lot
more
effective,
and
why
are
we
among
the
most
dense
area
because
the
homes
are
all
close
together,
but
yet
we
rely
on
automobile
use
a
lot
more.
The
cul-de-sac.
A
A
Our
next
meeting
for
the
assembly
committee
on
growth
and
infrastructure
will
be
on
thursday
april
29th
at
1
30,
here
in
this
room
and
virtually
for
those
who
are
not
able
to
travel
to
carson
city
to
join
us
in
person,
we
will
be
hearing
two
bills
and
have
a
work
session
on
thursday
and
members
with
that.
This
meeting
is.