►
From YouTube: 3/8/2021 - Assembly Committee on Judiciary
Description
For agenda and additional meeting information: https://www.leg.state.nv.us/App/Calendar/A/
Videos of archived meetings are made available as a courtesy of the Nevada Legislature.
The videos are part of an ongoing effort to keep the public informed of and involved in the legislative process.
All videos are intended for personal use and are not intended for use in commercial ventures or political campaigns.
Closed Captioning is Auto-Generated and is not an official representation of what is being spoken.
A
B
C
A
D
A
Here
we
do
have
a
quorum.
I
see,
assemblywoman
cohen
is
with
us.
Assemblywoman
hanson
appears
to
be
on
the
zoom,
but
maybe
not
in
front
of
her
computer.
So
I
will
note
when
she
arrives,
and
vice
chairwin
is
running
just
a
few
minutes
late.
So
for
now
please
mark
her
absent
excuse
and
I'll
also
note
when
she
arrives,
as
I
noted,
we
do
have
a
quorum.
A
I
want
to
wish
good
morning
to
the
members
who
are
joining
us
this
morning
and
to
members
of
the
public
who
may
be
watching
either
on
the
legislature's
website
or
on
our
youtube
channel.
Welcome
to
day
36
of
the
81st
session
of
the
nevada
legislature
and
happy
international
women's
day
to
everyone
as
well.
I
was
just
looking
at
our
committee
and
I
note
that
two-thirds
of
our
members
of
the
assembly
judiciary
committee
are
women,
so
happy
international
women's
day
to
the
members
and
to
our
staff,
the
majority
of
which
is
are
also
women.
A
A
Please
remember
to
state
your
name
if
you
are
presenting
today
each
time
that
you
speak
or
you're
asked
a
question
that
will
help
with
our
committee
secretary
preparing
the
minutes.
We
do
expect
courtesy
and
respect
in
our
interactions
with
one
another.
We
don't
always
agree
on
policy,
that's
perfectly
fine,
but
we
need
to
make
sure
being
respectful
of
one
another
and
of
the
legislative
institution
and
then
finally,
many
members
are
using
multiple
devices
and
screens
to
participate
in
this
morning's
meeting.
So
please
don't
see
it
as
a
sign
of
disrespect.
A
If
members
appear
to
be
looking
at
other
devices
during
the
meeting
with
those
behind
us
we're
going
to
move
to
our
agenda
members,
as
you
can
see,
we
have
one
bill
on
the
agenda
today,
so
I
will
go
ahead
and
open
up
the
hearing
on
assembly
bill
64.
assembly
bill
64
revises
provisions
relating
to
certain
crimes
for
members
of
the
committee.
You
should
have
received
by
email
this
morning
a
proposed
amendment
proffered
by
the
attorney
general's
office,
who's,
the
sponsor
of
the
bill
for
members
of
the
public.
A
You
can
also
find
that
amendment
on
nellis
the
proposed
amendment
on
nellis.
So
I
want
to
welcome
back
to
the
committee,
ms
adair
from
the
attorney
general's
office.
I
think
it's
been
a
little
while
since
you've
joined
us.
I
remember
the
presentation
early
on
in
the
session,
but
want
to
welcome
you
back
to
the
assembly
judiciary
committee
this
morning.
We'll
give
you
a
chance
to
present
the
bill
as
amended
and
then
I'm
sure
we'll
have
some
questions
for
you.
So
when
you're
ready
the
floor
is
yours.
E
Thank
you,
terry
aker.
Good
morning,
chair
and
members
of
the
committee
for
the
record.
My
name
is
jessica
adair
and
I
serve
as
the
chief
of
staff
in
the
nevada
attorney
general's
office.
Ab64
is
a
bill
intended
to
enhance
the
attorney
general's
attorney
general's
office,
ongoing
enforcement
efforts
against
sex
trafficking
in
nevada.
I
know
this
is
quite
a
heavy
topic
for
this
early
in
the
morning.
So
thank
you
for
bearing
with
me
sex
traffickers,
frequently
prey
on
the
most
vulnerable
among
us,
including
children,
and
those
who
have
a
history
of
trauma
or
being
abused.
E
Trafficking
organizations
can
be
sophisticated,
organized
crime
operations
or
a
single
individual.
Regardless
of
the
structure,
all
traffickers
use,
force
or
fraud
to
profit
off
of
the
commercial
sexual
exploitation
of
another
adult
or
a
child.
Combating
sex
trafficking
is
a
top
priority
for
attorney
general
ford.
Our
office
coordinates
with
other
federal
state
and
local
law
enforcement
agencies
in
nevada
to
investigate
and
prosecute
sex
trafficking
cases.
E
Our
prosecution
efforts
are
led
by
senior
deputy
attorney
general
alyssa
engler,
who
also
serves
as
the
nevada
advocate
for
missing
and
exploited
children
beyond
investigations
and
prosecution.
Our
office
coordinates
with
stakeholders
across
the
state
to
improve
the
state's
enforcement
efforts
and
services
provided
to
survivors.
E
For
example,
our
office
hosted
a
law
enforcement
summit
in
both
northern
and
southern
nevada
that
focused
on
sex
trafficking
and
brought
leading
experts
from
across
the
country
to
present
on
cutting
edge
investigation
techniques.
We
also
serve
on
multi,
multiple
trafficking
task
forces
and
the
nevada
coalition
to
prevent
the
commercial
sexual
exploitation
of
children.
E
Ab64
directly
relates
to
the
efforts
of
the
attorney
general's
office
ability
to
work
with
our
law
enforcement
partners
across
the
state
to
jointly
combat
this
insidious
criminal
activity.
I
would
like
to
bring
this
committee's
attention
to
an
amendment
provided
by
this
office.
This
amendment
reflects
changes
requested
by
criminal
justice,
stakeholders
and
other
interested
parties.
E
Turning
to
the
amendment
sections
one
and
two
revert
to
the
original
statutory
provisions
regarding
nrs
199.230
and
nrs
199.305,
respectively,
section
3
expands
the
office
of
the
attorney
general's
jurisdiction
to
prosecute
these
crimes.
Currently,
our
office
has
concurrent
jurisdiction
with
district
attorneys
to
prosecute
pandering
and
sex
trafficking,
which
is
nrs
200.300
living
from
the
earnings
of
a
prostitute,
nrs
201.320
and
advancing
prostitution,
which
is
nrs
201.395.
E
This
bill
clarifies
that
a
person
who
solicits
a
child,
a
peace
officer
posing
as
a
child
or
a
person
acting
on
behalf
of
a
peace
officer
by
posing
as
a
child,
is
guilty
of
soliciting
a
child
in
practice.
Law
enforcement
agencies
use
online
advertising
mechanisms
to
post
fake
advertisements
for
commercially
sexually
exploited
children.
E
This
method
of
investigation
specifically
targets
those
who
are
seeking
to
harm
nevada's
children.
It
also
represents
an
important
philosophical
shift
for
law
enforcement
to
focus
on
those
who
solicit
and
the
traffickers
themselves
and
away
from
focusing
on
the
victims
of
sex
trafficking
and,
finally,
section
5
of
the
amendment
removes
previously
proposed
changes
and
reverts
to
the
original
statutory
provisions
regarding
nrs
201.430.
A
F
F
If
I
may,
and
the
couple
questions
I
have
you
talk
about
a
person
by
persuasion,
force,
threat,
intimidation,
deception,
otherwise
is
with
the
intent
to
obstruct.
Then
you
go
on
to
describe
is
guilty
of
a
class
category
d
felony,
if
physical
force
or
the
immediate
threat
of
physical
force
is
used,
it's
a
gross
misdemeanor.
F
F
F
F
So
it
says
in
other
action,
investigations
or
other,
so
investigations
would
be
protected.
We
haven't
gone
to
court,
yet
I'm
just
handling
the
case
from
the
start,
so
any
of
that
any
prevention
of
a
witness
talking
to
me
you
could
prosecute
correct.
If
I
understand
this
correctly
and
to
me,
they
all
should
be
felonies.
E
Thank
you
assemblyman
for
the
question
jessica,
dare
for
the
record,
so
in
our
proposed
amendment,
we're
actually
taking
out
any
changes
to
the
current
nrs
regarding
victim
witness
dissuasion.
E
E
However,
we
that
that
leads
to,
I
think,
a
more
susceptible
susceptibility
for
people
to
be
dissuaded
from
testifying
against
their
traffickers,
but
after
working
with
various
stakeholders,
we
just
couldn't
come
to
an
agreement
that
would
best
encapsulate
that
relationship
and
legislating
a
way
to
specifically
address
that
dissuasion
piece,
and
we
also
understand
that
there
is
not
really
a
philosophical
or
appetite
towards
just
increasing
penalties,
whether
that's
for
philosophical
reasons,
but
also
for
fiscal
considerations
in
this
particular
legislative
session.
E
So
we
have
opted
to
remove
the
proposed
changes
to
that
section
and
stick
with
the
original
nrs
regarding
victim
dissuasion
or
end
witness
dissuasion.
So
I
I
think
your
questions
well
well
important
questions
for
us
to
discuss.
Unfortunately,
with
this
particular
amendment,
they
won't
affect
any
of
the
existing
nrs.
As
regarding
that
situation,.
F
E
F
Okay,
I
appreciate
that
clarification
and
I'll
just
say.
I
think
that
consider
we
can
talk
about
sentencing,
etc
and
financial
impact
to
the
state
or
the
counties
to
intimidate
a
witness.
Whether
it's
with
immediate
threat
or
implied
threat
period,
is
preventing
justice
from
prevailing
or
going
forward
and
should
be
a
felony
from
my
point
of
view
from
years
of
dealing
in
this.
A
You're
very
welcome
I'd
like
to
note
for
the
record
a
couple
of
items.
Assemblywoman
hanson
is
indeed
with
us
now,
as
is
vice
chair
wynn.
So
could
madam
secretary,
could
you
please
mark
them
as
present
and
then
committee?
We
haven't
really
looked
at
a
formal
amendment
yet,
and
so
I
know
we
have
a
number
of
new
folks
on
the
committee.
So
I'll
just
remind
folks
that
you
know
when
a
bill
comes
out
of
drafting
in
the
first
place
as
you're
aware,
the
blue
language
is
language,
that's
being
added
to
the
statute.
A
The
red
strikethrough
language
is
is
what
is
in
statute
and
is
being
deleted.
When
we
talk
about
amendments,
we
add
a
couple
of
different
colors.
One
of
those
is
green
and
green
is
very
new
language
in
the
amendment.
So
that's
language,
it
doesn't
appear
in
the
original
bill
and
then
we
have
purple
double
strikethrough
and
purple.
Double
strikethrough
is
signifies
deletion
of
things
that
were
added
in
the
original
bill,
so
hopefully
that's
not
too
complicated.
A
So
when
you're
looking
at
this
amendment-
and
you
see
those
colors
really-
the
purple
are
things
that
were
in
original
ab64
that
are
proposed
to
be
deleted
by
amendment
and
the
orange
language
is
new
language.
Essentially,
for
the
first
time
to
be
added,
excuse
me,
I
think
I
got
those
mixed
up.
The
green
language
is
language
that
is
being
added
for
the
first
time
in
the
amendment
and
the
purple.
Strikethrough
again
is
language
that
was
in
the
original
and
is
being
deleted.
A
A
A
A
That's
on
page
five
of
the
amendment,
and
you
touched
on
it
a
little
bit
how
police
officers
might
use
somebody
who
is
not
a
police
officer
who
is
posing
as
a
child,
and
I
think
you
mentioned
the
use
of
photographs,
so
presumably
photographs
of
people
that
are
not
police
officers
and
are
not
children
but
people
posing
as
children.
I
just
wondered
if
beyond
that
example,
are
you
aware
do
police
actually
get
individuals
involved
in
these?
A
Like
undercover
sting
operations
like
aside
from
just
the
photographs,
do
they
actually
use
people
to
to
sort
of
do
these
stings
and
see
if
they
can
lure
people
and
then
arrest
them.
E
Thank
you
chair,
and
I
will
just
note
that
I
I
prepared
this
amendment
myself.
So
if
you
catch
any
mistakes,
I
am
happy
to
revisit.
That
was
my
best
stab
at
it.
And
yes,
so
this
is
something
that
I
learned
in
our
law
enforcement
summit,
so
scammers
are
do
not
just
target
law-abiding
citizens.
E
They
also
target
those
who
are
using
many
of
the
online
systems
for
soliciting
sexual
commercial,
sexual
exploitation
and
so
frequently
when
someone
is
engaging
with
with
a
person
who
they
are
attempting
to
negotiate
a
transaction,
they
will
say,
send
me
a
picture
and
hold
up
x
number
of
fingers
to
prove
that
that
person
is
a
real
person
and
not
a
bot
or
someone
else
who
is
not
who
they
have
proposed
to
negotiate
with.
E
Then
later
they
set
up
a
a
hotel
room
or
a
loca,
a
home
where,
after
they
say,
let's
meet
at
this
particular
place
at
this
particular
time
the
person
shows
up
and
that's
when
they
are
arrested.
So
it's
not
just
an
operation
that
is
simply
a
matter
of
a
conversation
that
person
has
to
take
some
action,
then,
in
order
for
the
operation
to
be
complete.
Now
to
your
question
about
live
individuals
in
sting
operations.
E
Not
to
my
knowledge,
I
think
that
is
something
that
is
possible,
but
frankly,
not
very,
not
used
very
often
because
of
the
sheer
resources
that
it
would
take
to
conduct
those
kinds
of
operations
and
the
safety
for
for
officers
and
and
civilians
who
would
be
involved
in
those
those
operations.
A
Thank
you
for
that
answer
and
then
moving
on
to
page
seven
of
the
proposed
amendment,
the
language
that
you
have
about
midway
down,
and
I
realize
that
this
is
language.
That's
you
know
being
restored
from
the
original
nrs,
but
just
had
a
question
down
around
line
29.
It
talks
about
50
percent
of
the
money
deposited
being
used
for
the
enforcement
of
this
section
is
that
enforcement
is
that
meant
to
mean
these
undercover
sting
operations
or
what
exactly
would
enforcement
of
this
section
encompass
in
terms
of
50
of
the
money
deposited
in
the
fund.
E
I
thank
you,
chair
jessica
there
for
the
record.
Yes,
it
is
for
these
kinds
of
operations
and
other
similar
operations,
and
this
this
original
saturated
language
was
as
a
result
of
a
bill
sponsored
by
assemblywoman
tolls,
who
I
want
to
thank
for
her
work
on
this
particular
issue.
She
passed
a
bill
that
addressed
this
particular
section
and
the
penalty
scheme
civil
penalty
scheme
of
the
depositing
of
fines
in
these
two
different
areas,
and
so
after
hearing
from
from
stakeholders,
who've
been
relying
on
the
statutory
language
and
how
it
would
affect
their
enforcement
efforts.
A
Thank
you
and
then
the
final
question
I
have
on
the
amendment
at
the
page,
top
of
page
nine
line.
Three
we
have
the
word
advertise,
which
obviously
already
exists
in
the
statute,
but
my
question
was
when
we
then
turn
to
page
10
of
the
proposed
amendment.
There's
some
language
that's
being
deleted
there.
A
That
was
in
the
original
bill
proposed
as
new
language
and
one
of
those
was
to
define
the
term
advertise
or
advertising,
and
so
I
just
wondered
about
the
thought
process
of
deleting
that
definition
and
perhaps
there's
already
a
definition
of
advertise
in
the
nrs.
But
if
you
could
talk
a
little
bit
about
why
that
is
being
removed
from
the
original
bill,
please.
E
Yes,
absolutely
thank
you,
chair,
jessica,
dare
for
the
record,
so
this
was
a
suggestion
from
a
trafficking
organization
that
we
expand.
The
definition
of
advertising
to
include
electronic
advertising
online
advertising.
E
The
problem
with
that
in
a
practical
standpoint
is,
we
do
have
legal
houses
of
prostitution
here
in
this
state
and
expanding
that
online
provision
would
practically
affect
their
ability
to
advertise,
because
a
legal
house
of
prostitution
in
nye
county
cannot
prevent
a
user
in
clark
county,
for
example,
from
viewing
that
website.
So
from
a
practical
standpoint,
it
just
wasn't
going
to
work
with
the
technology
that
we
have
now.
So
that's
why
we
removed
it
and
and
that's
why
we
removed
the
definition
of
advertising
that
had
expanded
to
include
that
electronic
means.
A
A
Going
once
going
twice
all
right,
it
looks
like
I
don't
see,
questions
members.
If
you
do
have
questions
after
we
take
testimony
I'll,
allow
you
ask
some
of
those
at
the
end.
I
know
it's
monday
and
we're
all
just
getting
started
this
morning,
so
this
adair,
thank
you
for
presenting
I'll.
Ask
you
to
sit
tight
for
just
a
moment
and
we'll
have
we'll
come
back
to
you
for
concluding
remarks
once
we
get
through
testimony
on
the
bill,
so
I'm
going
to
now
open
the
testimony
in
support
on
assembly
bill
64..
A
G
G
C
Thank
you,
chair
yeager
members
of
the
committee.
My
name
is
jon
jones
here
on
behalf
of
the
nevada
district
attorneys
association
and
the
clark
county
district
attorney's
office.
We
just
wanted
to
voice
our
support
for
ab64
and
thank
the
attorney
general's
office
for
working
with
us
on
this
bill.
Thank
you.
G
C
This
bill,
thank
you
very
much.
G
C
Hi,
mr
chair
members
of
the
committee,
this
is
chuck
callaway
c-a-l-l-a-w-a-y
director
with
the
las
vegas
metropolitan
police
department,
calling
in
to
show
our
support
for
this
bill.
Thank
you.
G
C
A
Thank
you,
bps
I'll
note,
for
the
record
and
for
committee
members
that
there
are
two
exhibits
on
nellis.
One
is
a
letter
in
support
from
dignity,
health,
saint
rose,
dominican
and
the
other
is
a
letter
in
support
from
barbara
brents
unlv
professor
department
of
sociology,
and
I
do
believe
everyone
who's
testified
in
support,
although
they
may
not
have
said
it,
I
would
take
it
from
their
testimony
that
they're
in
support
of
the
bill,
as
proposed
in
the
amendment.
A
According
to
our
rules,
if
you're
in
support,
I
mean
you
support
the
amendment
that's
being
presented
by
the
sponsor
and
if
they
oppose
that
amendment
they
would
be
in
opposition.
So
although
they
didn't
say
that
I
believe
that
to
be
the
case
just
for
the
clarity
of
record
and
if
that's
not
the
case,
if
someone
could
let
us
know
that
would
appreciate
it.
So
I'm
going
to
close
supportive
testimony
I'll
now
open
testimony
in
opposition
to
assembly
bill
64,
as
proposed
in
the
amendment.
I
don't
think
we
have
anyone
on
the
zoom
with
us
bps.
A
C
G
C
Is
randy
hinken,
r-a-n-d-y
last
name
henkin
h-e-n-c-k-e-n,
the
resident
of
washoe
county,
I'm
not
really
in
opposition
to
bill.
I
think
it's
a
good
amendment,
but
I
am
concerned
about
what
measures
are
in
place
to
protect
otherwise
innocent
people
from
being
swept
up
in
these
child
stings.
I've
heard
and
read
a
expose
that
happened
up
in
washington.
C
It
was
the
new
york
times
about
dozens
of
men
who
had
committed
no
other
crimes
but
were
caught
in
child
stings
where
the
people
you
know
presented
a
you
know
what
looked
like
a
teenager,
although
it
could
have
been
perceived
as
an
adult
and
I'm
curious
if
the
da's
office
is
concerned
or
taking
measures
to
make
sure
that
the
people
they
do
actually
capture
our
true
predators
rather
than
people
who
thought
they
were
in
some
kind
of
cosplay,
and
I
encourage
the
da
to
find
that
exposed
could
actually
send
it
to
the
da's
office
if
they
had
never
seen
it.
A
Thank
you
for
your
testimony,
mr
henkin,
and
if
you
do
find
that
article
feel
free
to
send
it
to
the
committee
as
well,
you
can
send
it
to
our
committee
manager
or
you
can
just
forward
it
to
me
and
I'll
make
sure
everybody
gets
that.
So
thank
you
again
for
your
testimony.
Bps.
Is
there
anybody
else
in
opposition
to
assembly,
bill
64.
A
G
D
Good
morning,
everyone,
my
name,
is
caitlin
quinn,
c-a-I-c-l-a-n
she
and
I'm
here
from
the
sector
for
alliance
of
nevada,
I'm
here
with
your
morning
neutral
with
comments.
Firstly,
I
really
wanted
to
say
thank
you
to
ag's
office
and
specifically
jessica
adair
for
taking
the
time
to
listen
to
our
concerns
and
drop
all
of
the
increased
penalties
that
we
felt
makes
us
feel
so
dangerous.
We
are
in
support
of
the
amended
version.
D
However,
we're
really
excited
to
begin
new
conversations
with
ag's
office,
especially
with
this
proposed
concern
jurisdiction
with
the
amendment.
There's
really
nothing
in
this
bill
that,
on
its
surface,
is
harmful,
but
I
do
want
to
address
some
patterns
that
make
me
hesitant
to
throw
in
full
support
while
we're,
certainly
not
in
support
of
enabling
the
abuse
of
children.
I
find
the
general
push
towards
stings
and
arrests
troubling.
These
patterns
are
consistent
with
what
we
might
call
the
end.
D
Demand
model
sometimes
called
the
nordic
model,
because
it's
popular
in
scandinavian
countries
and
in
europe
it
has
been
proven
to
be
inefficient
in
stopping
the
abuse
of
vulnerable
people
doing
sex
work.
There's
ample
evidence
about
this.
You
can
do
a
quick
google
search
with
the
nordic
model
or
the
end
command
model.
It'll
show
that
most
major
human
rights
organizations
are
against
it,
but
let
me
just
take
a
moment
to
illustrate
it.
D
The
idea
is
that,
if
somebody's
doing
sex
work
either
through
enthusiastic
consent
or
because
it's
their
best
or
only
option,
criminalizing
buyers
does
not
make
the
market
safer.
Workers
will
be
forced
to
take
clients
in
risky
situations
without
being
able
to
vet
them
and
with
the
market
still
pushed
underground.
Many
workers
will
be
forced
to
work
with
pimps
or
managers
in
order
to
access
clients,
while
the
end
demand
model
does
make
the
arrested
sex
workers
less
likely,
it
does
nothing
to
quell
a
violent
and
exploitative
work
environment.
D
G
G
A
A
E
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
miss
adair
and
thanks
for
the
work
you
did
on
on
this
bill.
Obviously
the
amendment
looks
very
different
than
the
original
bill,
and
I
think
that
was
a
reflection
of
a
lot
of
input
from
folks
who
are
interested
in
the
bill.
So
I
appreciate
your
office's
willingness
to
do
that
and
come
forward
with
an
amendment
that
seems
to
be
a
consensus
piece
of
legislation.
So
thank
you
and
enjoy
the
rest
of
your
day.
A
I
will
now
close
this.
A
hearing
on
assembly
bill
64
that'll,
take
us
to
our
next
item
on
the
agenda,
which
is
public
comment
by
way
of
reminder.
We'll
reserve
up
to
30
minutes
of
public
comment
at
the
end
of
each
meeting
callers
on
the
public
comment
line
will
have
two
minutes
to
provide
public
comment
and
also
by
way
of
reminder.
Public
comment
is
a
time
for
comment
of
a
general
nature
for
matters
within
the
jurisdiction
of
this
committee.
A
G
G
H
Ann
marie
grant
a
n
n
e
m
a
r
I
e
g
r,
a
n
t.
My
brother
was
killed
at
washer
county
jail
after
he
was
hogged
high
for
40
plus
minutes
and
fixated
to
death.
This
past
saturday
march
6,
I
attended
an
event
in
boston
and
stood
in
solidarity
with
families
here
locally
impacted
by
police
violence,
including
justin,
terrence
coleman
and
vol
ramsey's.
Family
families
impacted
by
police
violence
across
the
country
were
calling
for
a
nationwide
protest.
H
This
past
weekend,
as
jury
selection,
begins
in
the
trial
of
the
cop
who
killed
george
floyd
derek
charvin.
Similar
events
were
held
across
the
country
saturday,
including
las
vegas.
Our
demands
are
the
conviction
of
george
floyd's
murderer,
reopen
all
past
cases
of
police,
brutality,
abuse,
murder
and
cover-up,
prosecute
convict
in
jail,
cops
who
abuse,
murder
and
cover-up,
prosecute
convict
and
jail.
Those
in
government
to
include
district
attorneys
who
aid
in
the
bet
police
brutality
when
I
watched
george
floyd
being
murdered
and
immediately
brought
me
back
to
my
brother
and
how
he
died.
H
I
called
for
public
comment
not
only
for
my
family
but
for
all
impacted
families
across
the
country.
According
to
fatalencounters.org
29
639
people
have
died
during
interactions
with
police
since
the
year
2395
in
nevada.
I
want
you
to
imagine
the
agonizing
and
terrifying
death.
My
brother
thomas
experienced
hogtie
for
40
minutes.
Now.
Imagine
it
was
someone
you
love
your
son,
daughter,
brother
parent.
He
even
said
to
the
officers.
Why
did
you
have
to
do
this
to
me?
Why
didn't
you
just
charge
me?
You
could
have
been
a
lot
better
people
about
this.
H
H
A
A
Thank
you,
bps
for
managing
public
comment
and
the
testimony
on
the
bill
today.
We
appreciate
it
so
I'll
now
close
public
comment
before
we
talk
about
the
rest
of
the
week.
Is
there
anything
from
any
of
the
committee
members
this
morning?
A
Okay,
I
don't
see
anything.
I
think
we're
all
trying
to
get
into
this
monday
morning
and
get
things
started,
but
we're
at
least
able
to
get
through
judiciary
in
a
pretty
timely
fashion
this
morning.
So
members
thank
you
for
being
here
on
time
today
and
for
your
thoughtful
participation
in
the
bill
in
terms
of
the
rest
of
the
week,
as
you
may
have
noted,
we
have
agendas
out
for
tuesday
and
wednesday.
So
far
both
are
going
to
be.
Eight
o'clock
starts.
We
have
two
bills
tomorrow.
A
As
far
as
I
know,
there
aren't
amendments
for
those
bills,
but
if
I
learn
otherwise
I'll
make
sure
to
get
those
out
to
you
and
then
I
I
do
expect
we're
going
to
have
committee
meetings
on
thursday
and
friday,
it's
just
a
matter
of
which
bills
and
and
what
time
will
be
starting.
So
I
don't
know
that
quite
yet,
but
hopefully
we'll
know
a
little
bit
more
tomorrow
and
wednesday,
and
we
also
may
add
another
bill
on
wednesday
right
now.
There's
just
one
bill
scheduled
for
hearing,
but
we'll
probably
add
another
one
before
then.