►
From YouTube: 3/24/2021 - Assembly Committee on Judiciary
Description
For agenda and additional meeting information: https://www.leg.state.nv.us/App/Calendar/A/
Videos of archived meetings are made available as a courtesy of the Nevada Legislature.
The videos are part of an ongoing effort to keep the public informed of and involved in the legislative process.
All videos are intended for personal use and are not intended for use in commercial ventures or political campaigns.
Closed Captioning is Auto-Generated and is not an official representation of what is being spoken.
A
C
C
A
A
That
means
we
do
have
a
quorum
good
morning
to
members
to
the
guests,
on
the
zoo
and
to
those
who
might
be
watching
on
the
legislature's
website
or
the
youtube
channel.
Welcome
to
day
52
of
the
81st
session
of
the
nevada
legislature
before
we
get
started
on
this
morning's
agenda,
just
a
few
housekeeping
matters
to
go
over
if
you
are
with
us
on
the
zoom,
please
mute
when
you're,
not
speaking,
that'll
help
with
the
audio
feedback
and,
if
you're
presenting
a
bill
today
or
answering
questions.
A
If
you
could
remember
to
state
your
name
each
time
before
you
speak,
that'll
help
our
committee.
Secretaries
prepare
accurate
minutes,
we
do
expect
courtesy
and
respect
and
our
interactions
with
one
another.
We
don't
always
agree
on
policy.
That's
perfectly
acceptable.
We
need
to
make
sure
we're
being
respectful
of
one
another,
the
legislative
process
and,
most
importantly,
our
very
hard-working
staff.
A
Finally,
keep
in
mind
that
many
members
are
using
multiple
devices
to
access
this
meeting,
including
extra
monitors,
iphones
ipads.
So
please
don't
see
it
as
a
sign
of
disrespect
if
members
appear
to
be
looking
away,
they're
most
likely
accessing
exhibits
or
notes
to
help
them
participate
in
the
meeting
with
that
behind
us
members,
you'll
see
that
we
have
quite
a
bit
on
our
agenda
today,
just
so
everyone
kind
of
knows
the
lay
of
the
land
we're
going
to
try
to
breeze
through
this
work
session
as
quickly
as
possible.
A
So
we
can
give
folks
a
chance
who
are
here
just
for
the
work
session
to
jump
off
the
zoom
and
get
on
with
their
day
and
then
we'll
take
the
bills.
The
the
one
bill
on
our
agenda
at
that
point.
So,
if
you're
here
to
present
that
bill,
we'll
just
ask
you
for
your
patience
as
we
get
through
this
work
session
here
this
morning
and
with
that
behind
us,
I'm
gonna
open
up
the
work
session
on
the
agenda
and
we're
going
to
take
the
bills
in
order
as
listed
on
the
agenda.
D
D
There
is
one
amendment
to
this
measure
sponsored
by
assemblyman
miller
and
honorable
chief
judge,
melissa,
saragosa,
and
the
amendment
first
clarifies
that
it's
calendar
days
in
the
bill
in
section
one
and
secondly,
it
provides
written
notice
that
is
sent
by
the
operator
to
the
registered
owner
of
the
vehicle.
Thank
you,
chair.
A
A
Okay,
I
don't
see
discussion.
Please
recall
members
will
be
doing
a
roll
call
vote
on
this
and
if
you
are
in
favor,
please
say
yes,
if
you
are
not,
please
say
no,
madam
secretary,
would
you
please
do
a
roll
call
vote
on
a
motion
to
amend
and
do
pass
assembly
bill?
32.
C
C
E
A
C
A
A
Thank
you,
simon
wheeler,
so
something
wheeler
is
a
yes
as
well.
Thank
you
for
interjecting
there.
So
now
we
have
a
yes
vote
from
everyone
who
is
present,
so
the
motion
does
carry
I'll,
assign
the
floor
statement
on
assembly
bill
32
to
assemblyman
miller,
we'll
move
on
to
assembly
bill
58,
ms
thornton.
D
D
There
is
one
amendment
proposed
to
this
bill
by
general
attorney
general
ford,
and
the
amendment
provides
that
a
state
of
nevada,
governmental
authority
or
asian
thereof
shall
not
engage
in
a
pattern
or
practice
that
deprives
people
of
their
rights,
privileges
or
immunities
secured
or
protected
by
the
constitution
or
laws
of
the
united
states
or
this
state.
Secondly,
it
provides
that
a
governmental
authority
be
given
up
to
30
days
to
respond
to
the
notification
by
the
nevada
office
of
the
attorney
general
of
a
claim
that
an
agency
has
a
pattern
or
practice
of
violating
people's
rights.
D
30
requires
that
the
attorney
general
office
participate
in
any
federal
pattern
or
practice
investigations
of
the
attorney
general's
office.
Fourth,
it
authorizes
the
attorney
general
to
file
a
civil
action
in
a
district
court
of
covenant
jurisdiction
where
the
government
governmental
authority
maintains
its
headquarters
to
enforce
the
terms
of
any
agreement
between
the
parties.
D
D
A
A
C
C
C
C
A
D
D
First,
it
clarifies
in
section
three
of
the
bill,
the
cost
for
which
a
claimant
can
be
reimbursed.
Secondly,
it
provides
in
section
4
that
the
claimant
must
inform
the
state
within
4
months
of
any
other
award
of
damages
or
settlement,
so
the
state
can
enact
the
offset
provision
and
recover
the
appropriate
funds.
A
A
C
A
C
C
A
D
Assembly
bill
149
was
sponsored
by
assemblywoman,
peters
and
heard
in
this
committee
on
march
3rd.
This
bill
enacts
provisions
relating
to
cannabis,
independent
testing
laboratories.
There
is
one
proposed
a
measure
amendment
to
this
measure.
First
strike
section
2
and
subsection
2
of
section
3
of
the
bill.
A
Thank
you,
miss
thornton
any
does
questions
on
assembly
bill
149
is
detailed
in
the
work
session
document.
A
A
C
F
C
C
C
A
Yes,
motion
carries
everyone
present
voted
in
favor.
I
also
note
that
we
do
have
assemblywoman
peters
with
us,
who
is
the
sponsor
of
the
bill,
so
I'm
going
to
assign
the
floor
statement
to
assemblywoman,
peters
and
just
in
case
we
need
a
backup
I'll
have
assemblywoman
marzola
listed
as
backup
on
assembly
bill
149.
D
Thank
you,
chair
assembly,
bill
158
was
sponsored
by
assemblywoman
monroe,
moreno
and
heard
in
this
committee
on
march
3rd.
This
bill
revises
the
penalties
for
certain
offenses
involving
alcohol
or
cannabis,
and
there
are
two
proposed
amendments
to
this
measure.
First,
assemblywoman
danielle
monroe
moreno
opposed
an
amendment
which
revises
the
penalties
in
the
bill
to
include
not
more
than
24
hours
of
community
service
attendance
of
a
meeting
of
a
panel
of
victims
and
or
an
evaluation
to
determine
whether
the
person
under
21
years
of
age
has
an
alcohol
or
substance
abuse
disorder.
A
Thank
you,
miss
thornton,
and
thank
you
to
everyone
who
continued
to
work
on
this
bill
after
the
hearing.
I
think
we
got
it
to
a
good
place
where
I
believe
everyone
is
on
board,
but
that
being
said,
I'm
willing
to
entertain
any
questions
on
assembly
bill
158
as
detailed
in
the
work
session
document.
A
F
C
Danielle
monroe
moreno
and
miss
goings
for
their
amendments
and
I'm
happy
to
support
this
bill.
So
thank
you
so
much.
A
A
C
F
C
C
C
D
A
Yes,
motion
does
carry
everyone
present
voted.
Yes,
congratulations,
assemblywoman,
monroe
moreno
and
I
will
go
ahead
and
give
you
the
floor
statement
on
the
bill
and
we'll
list
assemblywoman
billbray
axelrod
as
a
backup
just
in
case
we
need
one.
So
again,
thank
you
for
your
work
on
the
bill.
Greatly
appreciated.
A
D
C
Thank
you,
chair,
yeager,
not
a
question,
but
a
comment.
This
is
I'm
glad
we're
moving
the
spill
and
I
just
hope
we
can
continue
to
work
on
it
because
it's
still
not
quite
there
in
terms
of
aligning
the
language
with
the
goals
of
it.
So
I
I
want
to
keep
this
moving
so
that
we
can
pass
it
eventually,
but
hopefully
we'll
get
the
language
right
before
it's
final.
A
Okay,
so
I
have
a
motion
to
amend
the
due
pass
from
assemblywoman
kasama.
Second,
from
vice
chairwin,
we
have
the
prior
comment
from
assemblyman
orient
laker.
Anybody
else
with
discussion
on
the
motion
before
we
take
the
vote,
don't
see
any
further
discussion.
Madam
secretary,
I
believe
it's
time
for
a
roll
call
vote.
C
C
F
C
F
C
E
C
A
Yes,
motion
carries
everyone
present
voted,
yes,
and
I
see
we
have
our
sponsor
assemblywoman
told
with
us
here
in
committee.
Congratulations
and
I
will
assign
you
the
floor
statement
on
assembly
bill
182,
we'll
list
assemblywoman
hansen
as
a
backup.
Just
in
case
we
need
one
moving
right
along
you're
welcome,
moving
right
along
miss
thornton,
let's
take
assembly
bill
212
next.
D
D
There
is
one
amendment
proposed
by
assemblywoman
anderson,
and
it
requires
that
the
committee
to
advise
the
court
administrator
regarding
the
regulations
for
court
interpreters
to
submit
an
annual
report
to
the
nevada
legislature
and
also
stipulates
what
the
contents
of
the
annual
report
should
be.
Thank
you
chairman.
A
C
I
I'm
a
little
concerned
about
that.
What
section
is
that
it's
the
the
new
language
in
the
final
paragraph,
in
fact
the
final
subsection
of
the
final
paragraph,
the
including
information
on
the
use
of
certified
and
registered
interpreters.
If
available,
I
thought
that
all
interpreters
in
the
courts
had
to
be
certified,
and
so
I'm
a
little.
A
So
I
think,
if
I
could
jump
in
here,
my
recollection
was
there
is
certification
for
certain
languages
more
common
languages,
but
there
aren't
certification
programs
necessarily
for
some
of
the
more
uncommon
languages.
So
those
individuals
would
still
be
registered
with
the
court,
but
they
don't
have
a
certification
because
there
isn't.
I
guess
there
isn't
a
test
or
a
certification
process
for
some
of
those
languages.
C
A
A
A
C
F
C
C
D
A
Yes,
motion
carries
everyone
present
voted
in
favor,
I'm
going
to
sign
the
floor
statement
to
assemblywoman
anderson,
who
sponsored
the
bill
and
we'll
list
assemblyman
orient
liquor
as
a
backup
if
needed,
committee
moving
right
along.
We
are
almost
there.
So,
let's
take
assembly
bill
214
next,
miss
thornton.
D
Thank
you,
chair
assembly,
bill
214
was
sponsored
by
assemblywoman
considering,
and
this
bill
revises
provisions
governing
sexual
assault.
There
are
two
proposed
amendments
to
the
bill
which
do
the
following.
First,
it
deletes
the
language
that
person
and
replaces
it
with
themselves,
and,
secondly,
it
adds
a
co-sponsor
to
the
bill.
A
A
C
C
E
C
A
D
Assembly
bill
237
was
sponsored
by
assemblywoman,
houdiki
and
heard
in
this
committee
on
march
19th.
This
bill
revises
various
provisions
relating
to
real
property.
There
is
one
amendment
proposed
by
assemblywoman
howard,
and
the
amendment
does
the
following.
First,
it
deletes
section
one
of
the
bill.
D
A
C
Thank
you,
chair
yeager.
When
we're
talking
about
the
consumer
price
index
I'd,
we
do
have
a
specific
one
for
the
western
states,
and
would
I,
if
assemblywoman
had
a
gui
is
on
the
call
it
would.
I
would
suggest,
or
make
a
suggestion
that
we
attach
it
to
this
area
and
not
the
united
states
in
general,
so
that
it
can
be
more
in
keeping
with
our
region.
A
D
A
So
what
I'll,
what
I'll
do
just
to
sort
of
be
clear,
I'll,
take
a
motion
on
on
the
bill
as
as
presented
in
front
of
us,
but
if
the
two
of
you
want
to
continue
to
have
further
discussions
about
that,
of
course,
the
bill
would
have
to
go
through
the
assembly
floor
and
the
senate
as
well.
So
we
just
encourage
you
to
keep
working
on
that
issue
as
we
move
things
along
any
other
questions
on
assembly
bill
237,
as
detailed
in
the
work
session
document.
C
A
A
I
think
we
had
a
motion
to
amend
a
due
pass
from
vice
chairwin
assemblywoman
summers:
armstrong
did
you
make
the
second?
If
you
give
me
a
thumbs
up?
A
D
C
C
E
C
D
D
D
A
C
Thank
you
chair.
I
do.
I
did
not
see
the
amendment
and
I
apologize
for
that.
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
with
the
sponsor
that
it
is
a
friendly
amendment,
assemblywoman
gonzalez,
at
district
16.
Thank
you
so
much.
Yes,
it
is
a
friendly
amendment
and
I
did
agree
to
it.
Thank
you
for
checking.
A
C
Our
caucus
is
still
talking
to
the
doc
director
on
this.
We
had
some
questions
on
it,
so
we
will
all
be
voting
yes
to
get
out
of
committee,
but
there's
a
change
in
that.
Mr
chairman,
we
will
let
you
in
the
bill
sponsor
no.
A
Okay,
don't
see
questions
at
this
time,
I'll,
take
a
motion
to
amend
and
do
pass
and
move
to
amended
who
passed
yeah.
I
think
we,
I
think
we
had
a
motion
to
amend
a
new
pass
from
vice
chairwin.
I
saw
assemblywoman
gonzales
get
in
there
with
a
second
right
before
assemblyman
orient
liquor.
I
believe
any
discussion
on
the
motion.
A
Mr
wickham
were
in
the
discussion
portion,
but
is
there
perhaps
I
could
ask
you
to
take
any
concerns
sort
of
offline
because
we're
just
we're
past
the
motion
at
this
point
so
we're
beyond
testimony
at
this
moment.
Any
discussion
from
members
of
the
committee
on
assembly
bill
241.
A
C
C
C
C
A
A
Before
we
move
on
to
the
bill
hearing,
we
do
have
one
other
order
of
business,
and
that
is
committee
bill
introductions.
I
have
four
assembly
judiciary
committee
bills
in
front
of
me
here
and
I
will
list
them
off.
If
everyone
is
going
to
be
a
yes,
we
could
simply
take
one
motion
to
pass
them
all.
At
the
same
time,
if
that's
not
going
to
be
the
case,
we
can
take
them
separately,
but
let
me
list
them
off,
so
everybody
knows
what
we're
dealing
with.
So
I
have
bdr14-484
makes
various
changes
relating
to
criminal
justice.
A
Bdrs-1036
requires
the
legislative
council
bureau
to
enter
into
an
agreement
with
a
qualified
consultant
to
analyze
data
submitted
to
the
legislative
council
bureau
concerning
traffic
stops
and
other
stops,
and
we
have
bdr
15-580
abolishes
capital
punishment.
So
those
are
the
four
that
we
have
in
front
of
us
and
I
guess
before
I
take
a
motion,
I'll
just
ask:
is
there
anybody
intending
to
vote?
No
and
again,
this
is
a
committee
bill
introduction.
So
a
yes
vote
does
not
commit
you
to
supporting
the
measure.
A
It
simply
allows
it
to
be
drafted,
come
back
to
committee
and
then,
of
course
it
would
maybe
have
a
hearing
like
we
do
with
other
bills.
When
you'd
be
able
to
ask
questions
and
register
your
support
or
opposition.
So
again
just
want
to
ask
if
there's
anyone
out
there
who
would
like
me
to
take
these
individually
versus
one
motion?
A
A
C
C
E
E
D
A
Yes,
the
motion
does
carry
everyone
who
is
here
voted
in
favor.
Thank
you
committee
for
having
letting
us
do
that
in
one
motion.
I
think
it
saved
us
a
little
bit
of
time
this
morning.
A
A
We
have
senator
spearman
here
to
present
the
bill
and
I
believe
she
has
some
backup
as
well,
including
chair
dorico
from
the
parole
board,
so
welcome
to
the
two
of
you
to
the
assembly
judiciary
committee.
We'll
give
you
a
chance
to
make
your
presentation,
then
I'm
sure
we'll
have
some
questions.
Welcome
and
please
proceed.
G
Thank
you
thank
you,
chair
yeager
and
committee
members,
and
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
present
assembly
bill
342.
for
the
record.
I
am
pat
spearman
representing
senate
district
1
in
clark
county
assembly
bill
342
was
requested
by
the
sunset
committee
of
the
legislative
commission,
and
it
is
my
pleasure
to
serve.
Was
my
pleasure
to
serve
as
the
chair
of
that
subcommittee
during
the
2019
and
2020
interim
with
me.
Today
is
christopher
dorico.
G
G
The
subcommittee
chose
to
review
the
board
largely
because
it
had
never
been
reviewed
by
the
subcommittee
in
previous
interims.
The
subcommittee
reviewed
the
board
on
february
twenty
first
twenty
twenty.
During
that
review,
mr
dirico
presented
the
proposed
legislative
changes
ultimately
included
in
three
ab342
on
august
31st
2020.
G
There
is
really
no
fiscal
impact
attached
to
assembly
bill
342,
and
I
am
not
aware
of
any
amendments,
mr
chair,
with
your
permission,
I'd
like
to
turn
this
over
for
further
presentation.
Over
to
mr
rico,
as
a
sunset
committee
requested
this
legislation
on
the
board's
behalf,
and
I
would
also
request
that
you
all
would
understand-
I
have
commerce
labor
going
on,
and
I
want
to
get
back
to
cheering
my
committee
as
well.
If
that's
okay,.
A
Thank
you
so
much
senator
spearman
first
just
appreciate
your
work
in
the
interim
chairing
the
sunset
subcommittee
and
certainly
understand
you
have
other
obligations.
So
thank
you
for
joining
us
here
this
morning
and
please
feel
free
to
get
back
over
to
your
committee.
I'm
sure
that
mr
I
lost
my
training
out
there.
Mr
jurico
can
handle
any
questions
that
might
come
up
on
the
measure.
So
thank
you.
Senator
thank.
E
Great
thank
you
good
morning,
gerry
yeager
vice
chair
nguyen
and
all
members
of
the
assembly
committee
on
judiciary.
My
name
is
christa
rico
and
I'm
the
chairman
of
the
board
of
parole
commissioners.
Before
I
start,
I
would
especially
like
to
thank
senator
spearman
and
all
the
members
of
the
sunset
subcommittee
for
assisting
us
with
this
proposed
legislation.
E
I
know
your
time
is
valuable,
so
I'm
going
to
just
dig
right
in
in
its
present
form
section
1
of
the
spill
specifically
subsection
6
of
nrs
213.10885
requires
the
board
to
comprehensively
review
the
standards
adopted
by
the
board
on
or
before
january
1
of
each
odd-numbered
year.
The
board
has
used
a
validated
risk
instrument
since
2003.
E
E
The
board
contracts
with
an
outside
consultant
jfa,
to
perform
the
revalidation
of
these
standards.
This
process
requires
the
consultant
to
review
at
least
three
years
of
data
perform
the
assessment,
analyze
the
results
and
prepare
a
report
with
a
recommendation
to
the
board.
The
board
then
needs
time
to
review
the
consultant's
recommendation
and
either
adopt
and
or
modify
the
standards
and
approve
this
at
a
board
meeting
once
approved.
E
E
If
this
amended
language
fails
to
pass,
the
board
will
continue
to
request
25
000
in
the
first
fiscal
year
of
the
biennium,
and
if
three
years
of
data
has
not
been
obtained,
the
review
will
not
be
completed
and
the
25
000
dollars
will
be
reverted
back
to
the
general
fund,
and
I
I
would
like
to
ask
chair
yeager
because,
as
a
part
of
this
bill
and
ab342,
the
the
this
section
and
sections
two
and
three
are
distinctly
different.
E
It
might
be
best
if
I,
if
there
are
any
questions
with
regard
to
this
particular
section,
and
so
they
don't
get
convoluted
before
each
other.
I
ask
if
that
might
be
appropriate
at
this
time.
A
A
E
According
to
statute,
this
statute,
the
board
shall
establish
a
program
of
lifetime
supervision
of
sex
offenders
to
commence
after
any
period
of
probation
or
any
term
of
imprisonment
and
any
period
of
release
on
parole
under
current
law.
The
parole
board
sets
the
conditions
for
lifetime
supervision
for
a
convicted
sex
offender.
E
This
generally
occurs
90
days
or
so
before.
An
individual
is
about
to
complete
their
sentence
for
the
qualifying
sex
offense,
which
means
these
conditions
of
lifetime
supervision
may
not
be
imposed
for
one
two,
five
or
even
ten
or
more
years
after
an
individual
is
sentenced
after
the
parole
board
sets
these
conditions.
E
So
here's
an
example
here
is
why
I
believe
the
way
lifetime
supervision
conditions
are
imposed
can
be
improved.
For
example,
in
a
case
where
a
district
judge
imposes
probation
and
later
there
are
alleged
violations
of
probation,
the
probation
violations
are
heard
back
before
the
district
court
judge
to
impose
that
probation
for
a
parole
case.
The
parole
board
sets
the
conditions
of
parole
and
later
if
there
are
alleged
violations
of
parole.
These
violations
are
heard
back
before
the
parole
board,
who
set
those
conditions
of
parole.
E
However,
the
way
things
stand
now
for
lifetime
supervision
of
sex
offenders,
the
parole
board
imposes
the
conditions
of
release,
but
if
they
allegedly
violate,
which
is
a
new
criminal
offense.
This
determination
is
made
by
the
district
court
judge.
So
essentially,
the
parole
board
sets
the
conditions
on
cases
where
they
will
not
determine
any
future
violations.
E
The
court
makes
this
determination.
These
changes
that
I
have
included
in
here
were
modeled.
After
what
occurs
in
the
united
states
court
system
or
the
federal
system,
they
do
just
what
I'm
proposing
here.
They
will
sentence
an
individual
for
an
underlying
sex
offense
and,
following
this,
at
the
same
sentencing,
hearing
a
judge
will
impose
the
conditions
of
lifetime
supervision
to
follow
upon
completion
of
the
underlying
offense.
E
After
doing
so,
they
would
indicate
something
on
record
that
would
be
to
the
effect
of
upon
completion
of
your
underlying
term.
You
are
also
ordered
to
serve
a
period
of
lifetime
supervision
with
the
following
conditions,
as
enumerated
in
what
is
proposed
in
section
3
of
this
bill,
which
is
nrs
176.0931.
E
It
mirrors
what
is
already
in
place
in
section
two
of
this
bill
which
references,
nrs
213.1243,
which
support
parole
board
if
the
conditions
of
the
parole
board
presently
imposes
so
there's
no
change
to
language,
there's
no
edits.
Basically,
transfer
of
duties
moving
forward
with
the
same
conditions
by
imposing
these
lifetime
supervision
conditions
at
sentencing,
the
court
will
have
the
most
relevant
data
on
the
case.
The
district
attorney
will
be
present
as
well
as
the
public
defender
or
any
retained
counsel.
Any
questions
regarding
these
imposed
conditions
could
be
discussed
at
the
time
of
sentencing.
E
E
E
So
here's
an
important
aspect
of
how
this
bill
is
worded.
The
parole
board
will
continue
to
set
conditions
of
release
for
any
one
sentence
prior
to
july
1
2021,
which
means
that
we
will
still
be
doing
this
for
many
years
to
come.
We
do
not.
We
did
not
want
the
district
courts
to
have
to
add
any
other
hearings
in
order
to
set
these
conditions,
which
would
take
additional
time
of
district
attorneys
public
defenders,
any
victims
that
may
show
up
in
a
case.
E
This
is
why
it
was
all
combined
to
be
ordered
right
there
at
sentencing,
but
cases
that
have
already
been
sentenced.
That's
okay!
We
understand
that
the
only
way
to
best
move
forward
would
be
for
us
to
continue
to
handle
these
until
they
are
eventually
weeded
out
many
years
down
the
road
so
essentially
section
bill.
Three
of
this
bill
shifts
those
duties
moving
forward
and
with
that
said
I'll
conclude
my
presentation
and
I'm
willing
to
answer
any
questions
that
anybody
may
have.
A
Thank
you
so
much
chair,
dorico,
I'm
going
to
ask
for
your
patience
for
just
a
second,
because
I
received
another
committee
bdr.
While
you
were
giving
your
presentation
so
for
the
moment,
I'm
going
to
suspend
this
hearing
and
just
allow
us
as
a
committee
to
take
care
of
this
quick
item
of
business.
So
we
can
get
this
bill
down
to
the
floor.
So
just
please
sit
tight
for
a
moment
committee,
members
and
so
and
by
the
way
I
said
we
had
our
last
roll
call
vote.
A
So
again
on
this
committee,
bdr
you're
not
agreeing
to
support
the
bill.
It
just
allows
it
to
be
drafted
so
I'll.
Take
a
motion
to
introduce
bdr
mr.
C
A
C
E
C
C
A
Yes,
the
motion
does
pass
unanimously.
Thank
you
committee.
We
will
now
go
back
to
our
hearing
on
assembly
bill
342.,
chairman
dorico
had
just
finished
presenting
and
before
I
open
it
up
for
some
additional
questions
chairman.
I
just
wanted
to
ask
a
couple
clarifying
questions
based
on
the
presentation,
so
my
recollection
was
the
way
that
it
works
now
under
current
law
is
when
one
of
these
individuals
is
sentenced
in
district
court.
A
Normally
the
judge
would
impose
the
sentence
and
then
they
would
say
something
to
the
effect
of
you
are
also
sentenced
to
a
special
condition
of
lifetime
supervision
and
then
just
leave
the
actual
conditions
of
lifetime
supervision
to
be
given
by
the
parole
board.
I
guess
at
the
time
of
parole,
so
I
want
to
confirm
with
you
that
that's
accurate
in
terms
of
how
it
works
right
now.
E
Yes,
thank
you,
chair,
yeager,
christa
rico,
for
the
record,
so
you
are
correct
at
the
imposition
of
sentence
the
the
court
would
order
the
sentence
of
lifetime
supervision.
However,
what
does
not
occur
at
that
time
is
the
imposition
of
those
conditions
of
lifetime
supervision,
so
those
for
the
for
the
convicted
sex
offenders.
So
what
happened?
E
We
know
down
the
road
as
a
part
of
the
judgment
that
an
individual
was
sentenced
to
a
term
of
life
of
lifetime
sex
offender
supervision,
but
that's
where
it
takes
many
years
down
the
road,
whether
until
a
person
may
set
satisfy
their
term
of
probation,
complete
an
incarceration
term
or
complete
a
parole
term
where
once
they
get
close
to
that,
that's
where
the
parole
board
would
then
impose
those
conditions
so
as
a
result
of
what
I'm,
what
is
being
requested
here,
it's
right
when
that
judge
imposes
and
to
follow
your
underlying
offense.
E
A
Thank
you
chairman.
That
makes
sense,
and
then
the
other
just
clarifying
question,
as
you
had
mentioned
in
section
three
of
the
bill
in
the
bill
itself,
there's
a
lot
of
blue
language
which
normally
means
new
language.
But
in
this
particular
case
it
indicated
that
this
is
language
that
already
exists.
It's
just
being
moved
into
a
different
part
of
nrs,
but
the
the
blue
language
in
section
3,
basically
details
what
is
already
permissible
under
statute
as
a
condition
of
lifetime
supervision.
E
Thank
you,
chair,
yeager,
christa
rico,
for
the
record.
Yes,
you're,
absolutely
correct.
I
I
last
night
I
had
a
very
busy
evening
of
emails
and
and
and
phone
calls
regarding
this
and
that
language
is
exactly
it.
It
mirrors
what
is
already
in
place,
but
it's
new
language
under
nrs
176,
and
so
that's
why
there's
so
much,
of
course,
we'll
say:
blue
language
there,
it's
not
new.
E
If
you
go
back
in
above
and
you
look
at
nrs
213.12,
you
will
see
that
that
language
mirrors
what's
what's
in
place
already,
it's
just
a
shifting
of
duties
to
try
and
streamline
and
be
more
efficient
in
this
matter.
A
I
think
I
have
everyone
on
one
screen
any
questions
about
the
bill.
It
means
I
may
have
asked
the
ones
that
you
all
had
as
well.
So
maybe
I
saved
a
little
bit
of
time
this
morning.
So
chair
dirico,
I
don't
see
further
questions
at
this
time.
So
I'll
ask
you
to
sit
tight
for
a
moment,
we'll
take
some
testimony
on
the
bill
and
then
we'll
come
back
to
you
for
any
wrap
up
that
you
might
have
on
the
bill.
Thank
you.
A
A
F
A
A
F
F
F
C
Good
morning,
chairman
yeager
and
members
of
the
assembly
judiciary
committee,
this
is
john
pirro
j-o-h-n-p-I-r-o
from
the
clark
county
public
defender's
office.
I'd
like
to
thank
chairman
dorico
for
spending
time
talking
to
me
late
at
night
about
this
bill.
We
are
not
opposing
the
intent
of
the
bill,
we're
just
opposing
some
of
the
ways
that
the
bill
is
worded
and
how
it
would
get
to
accomplish
that
intent.
C
So
we're
hoping
that
we
could
sit
down
with
chairman
dorico
in
the
future
work
out
some
of
the
language
in
the
bill
to
actually
accomplish
the
intent
that
he
is
seeking
to
accomplish.
We
don't
necessarily
object
to
having
courts,
enumerate
the
conditions,
a
lifetime
sentence,
supervision
at
sentencing
it.
I
I
do
like
his
faith
in
the
courts
to
get
these
hearings
done
efficiently.
I
don't
know
that
in
practice,
that
will
be
what
happens,
but
still
we
have
no
objection
to
that
particular
thing
going
forward.
F
C
We
certainly
do
not
have
an
issue
with
the
bill's
intent
as
explained
by
chair
dorico
this
morning,
but
we
are
worried
that
the
language
doesn't
clearly
reflect
that
intent.
Specifically,
we
want
to
make
sure
that
section
3
clearly
reads
that
imposition
of
lifetime
supervision
conditions
that
will
apply
once
the
offender
is
paroled
will
occur
simultaneously
as
as
the
imposition
of
sentence,
so
that
no
separate
hearing
is
needed.
C
We're
also
concerned
about
the
implications
of
nrs
213.1243
sub
9,
which
is
existing
law
provision
regarding
exemption
from
supervision
conditions
in
extraordinary
circumstances
as
written
the
bill
would
move
that
analysis
from
the
parole
board
hearing
to
the
more
adversarial
venue
of
a
district
court
hearing
which
could
have
perhaps
unintended
consequences,
but
we
are
really
looking
forward
to
working
with
senator
spearman
charter
rico
and
all
the
stakeholders
on
language
that
addresses
concerns
that
have
been
expressed
here
today.
That
concludes
my
testimony.
Thanks.
So
much.
F
C
Good
morning
cheerier
grand
members
of
the
assembly
judiciary-
this
is
kendra
burchie,
k-e-n-d-r-a
b-e-r-t-s-c-h-y,
with
the
washoe
county
public
defender's
office,
like
those
in
opposition.
Before
me,
our
office
supports
the
intention
of
this
bill,
but
we
are
concerned
with
as
written
the
additional
motion
practice
the
litigation
and
hearings
that
it
would
necessary
necessitate
in
district
court,
which
also
then
comes
with
the
possible
appellate
rights
and
so
the
due
to
the
additional
workload.
There
would
be
a
fiscal
impact
on
my
office,
I'll
save
that
information
for
later.
C
If
we're
unable
to
to
change
the
wording
of
the
statute
or
of
this
bill
in
order
to
accurately
reflect
the
intention,
we
appreciate
cherrico
for
his
hard
work
with
meeting
with
stakeholders,
especially
late
at
night,
to
be
able
to
address
some
of
our
questions
and
we
hope
to
continue
that
work
in
order
to
ensure
that
we
are
crafting
language
that
reflects
the
intention
of
this
bill.
Thank
you.
F
C
H
C
H
A
A
A
E
Yes,
thank
you
chair.
So
a
lot
of
the
concerns,
at
least
that
they're
closing
remarks
I
have
it
has
to
do
with
the
language
and
and
to
make
sure
the
intent
of
the
the
bill
or
of
what
I'm
looking
for
is
occurs
so
yeah.
I
I
look
forward
to
working
with
the
other
individuals
that
I've
spoken
with
on
this
to
to
kind
of
streamline
this
process.
E
I
did
want
to
just
close
by
saying
you
know
you
know
if,
ultimately,
this
doesn't
move
forward,
which
I'm
hoping
that
it
does
section.
One
of
this
bill
is
still
particularly
important
to
the
parole
board
and
I
think
it's
a
something
that
does
save
the
state
money
as
well,
instead
of
having
give
us
money
and
then
keep
giving
it
back
so
with
that
I'll
close
for
today,
unless
anybody
has
any
questions.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you,
chair
dirico,
and
you
know
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
to
those
who
called
in.
I
know.
Bills
are
coming
out
fast
and
furious
and
we're
having
hearings,
perhaps
more
quickly
than
any
of
us
would
like
to
so.
I
definitely
appreciate
folks
reaching
out
to
the
sponsor
and
being
willing
to
talk
about
these
things.
Even
late
into
the
night
certainly
understand
going
forward
that
we're
going
to
have
bills
that
still
need
a
little
bit
of
work,
but
it's
important
that
we
get
through
the
hearings
and
be
able
to
keep
moving
forward.
A
So
thank
you
for
being
willing
to
do
that,
chair,
dorico
and
for
those
who
called
in
in
opposition.
I
know
there
were
several
discussions
last
evening
and
I
certainly
appreciate
you
looping
me
into
the
fact
that
those
discussions
were
happening
so
with
that
chair
dorico
thanks
for
joining
us
this
morning.
We
hope
you
have
a
great
rest
of
the
day.
A
Thank
you
thanks.
All
of
you,
so
I'll
close
the
hearing
on
assembly
bill
342
that
takes
us
to
our
next
item
on
the
agenda,
which
is
public
comment.
By
way
of
reminder,
we
reserve
up
to
30
minutes
for
public
comment
at
the
end
of
each
meeting.
Commenters
on
the
public
comment
line
will
have
two
minutes
to
provide
public
comment.
Public
comment
is
a
time
to
raise
matters
of
a
general
nature
within
the
jurisdiction
of
the
assembly
judiciary,
committee
eps.
F
F
F
H
Advocates
for
the
inmates
in
the
innocent,
we
would
just
like
to
say
thank
you.
C
A
F
F
A
F
F
F
H
Ian
marie
grant
a-n-n-e-m-a-r-I-e
g-r-a-n-t
my
brother
was
38
years
old
when
he
was
killed
by
reno
police
and
washer
county
sheriff's
during
a
mental
health
crisis.
Today,
I'd
like
to
read
a
little
bit
of
a
letter
from
carol
luke,
who
is
the
mother
of
thomas
mcinerney,
who
was
killed
by
las
vegas
metro
on
november
24
2015.
H
My
son
was
more
than
an
ois
victim
of
lb
mpd.
He
was
a
father,
a
brother
and
uncle
a
friend
to
many.
He
would
do
anything
for
his
family.
He
would
pick
up
his
sister
from
work
whenever
she
needed
and
he
helped
his
other
sister
raise
her
daughter
and
gave
her
a
place
to
stay
when
she
needed.
He
was
my
biggest
support
system
through
some
of
the
most
difficult
times
in
my
life,
my
son
was
diagnosed
with
bipolar
as
a
child
in
schizophrenia
around
2010,
however,
he
was
able
to
come
almost
all
adversaries.
H
F
H
H
He
was
able
to
father
his
beautiful
children.
We
were
more
than
a
mother
and
son.
His
three
children
remind
me
so
much
so
much
of
my
son,
thomas.
I
don't
know
if
that's
a
blessing
or
a
curse,
because
it
affects
me
on
the
night
of
november
24
2015,
my
son
was
driving
a
car,
but
the
license
plates
were
registered
to
another
car
he
owned.
Therefore,
it
was
classified
as
cold-plated
within
one
minute
of
arrival
on
scene.
Thomas
was
shot
eight
times
by
three
officers
and
was
assassinated.
H
I'd
like
to
point
out
the
issues
with
my
son's
case,
which
is
ground
for
reopening
and
reinvestigating
a
bell
beat
lvmpd
to
include
officer
kyle,
pryor
officer,
robert
nord
and
officer
donald
seiden
in
las
vegas
da's
office
as
well.
Although
video
and
autopsy
reports
show
the
tape
was
successful
prior
claimed
in
his
report,
it
was
unsuccessful
and
lvmpd
even
stated
to
various
news
sources.
The
same.
My
officer
pryor
was
involved
in
another
officer-involved
shooting
in
june
of
2016,
and
in
that
case
he
claimed
his
tase
failed
to
work
as
well.
H
In
the
security
guard
statement,
he
said
my
son
never
had
a
gun
in
his
hands.
However,
he
did
see
something
lit
up
and
it
looked
like
a
phone
or
tablet.
Thomas's
mother
has
the
bullet
rid
of
ipad
thomas.
Had
that
night
after
the
officer
shot
my
son,
they
still
handcuffed
and
moved
his
body
and
failed
to
serve
immediate
medical
attention
and
failed
to
call
for
medical
professionals.
H
As
my
mother
previously
mentioned,
my
brother
thomas
had
been
diagnosed
with
a
mental
health
disorder
as
a
child,
so
those
two
facts
alone
can
show
how
thomas
was
neglected
by
the
state
of
nevada
at
an
early
age
in
life
because
of
the
lack
of
care
nevada
has
for
those
who
are
not
neurotypical
thomas
is
missed
by
his
family
and
his
loved
ones,
just
like
my
brother,
is
missed
by
so
many.
Please
support
bills
that
promote
transparency
and
accountability,
and
thank
you
all
for
your
hard
work.
A
F
C
Hi,
my
name
is
taylor,
thompson,
t-a-y-l-o-r
last
name
t-h-o-m-p-s-o-n,
and
I
am
calling
today
to
ask
committee
to
hear
assembly
bill
161
by
the
end
of
the
month.
Five
hundred
thousand
nevadans
are
going
to
be
at
risk
of
eviction
when
the
cdc's
memorandum
has
expired.
The
least
this
committee
can
do
is
please
hear
the
bill.
The
lease
give
families
they
do
process
before
they
are
evicted.
A
C
A
A
Thank
you
bps,
as
always
appreciate
your
help
in
making
these
runnings
these
meetings
run
smoothly.
I
will
close
public
comment.
I
don't
see
any
other
committee
bdrs
in
front
of
us
so
before
we
talk
about
the
rest
of
the
week
anything
else
from
our
hard-working
committee
members
this
morning,
I
don't
see
anything.
Thank
you
all
again
for
helping
us
get
through
that
agenda
very
quickly
in
terms
of
where
we
go
from
here.
A
We
do
have
agendas
out
now
for
thursday
and
friday
tomorrow
we're
going
to
be
starting
at
nine
o'clock,
so
you
can
get
here
at
eight,
but
we
won't
start
until
nine
and
we'll
have.
We
have
four
bills
on
the
agenda
tomorrow,
but
three
of
those
I
think
we'll
be
hearing
all
at
the
same
time
because
they
are
very
similar.
If
not
the
same,
and
then
friday
we
have
an
agenda
out
and
just
to
mix
things
up
a
little
bit
we'll
be
starting
at
8
30
on
friday.
A
So
not
eight
o'clock,
not
nine
o'clock,
but
8
30..
We
have
two
bills
that
we'll
be
hearing
on
the
agenda
friday.
So
that's
what
we've
got
for
now.
I
anticipate
we're
going
to
have
committee
meetings
every
day
next
week,
we're
just
kind
of
putting
those
together
as
we
speak
so
again,
committee.
Thank
you.
It's
an
honor
to
chair
this
committee
every
morning
and
to
see
all
of
you.
I
will
see
you
back
here
tomorrow
morning
at
nine
o'clock.
This
meeting
is.