►
From YouTube: 2/4/2021 - Assembly Committee on Judiciary
Description
For agenda and additional meeting information: https://www.leg.state.nv.us/App/Calendar/A/
Videos of archived meetings are made available as a courtesy of the Nevada Legislature.
The videos are part of an ongoing effort to keep the public informed of and involved in the legislative process.
All videos are intended for personal use and are not intended for use in commercial ventures or political campaigns.
Closed Captioning is Auto-Generated and is not an official representation of what is being spoken.
C
C
A
Present
we
do
have
a
quorum.
I
note
that
assemblywoman
summers
armstrong
is
here.
I
think
she
might
be
having
some
audio
problems,
so
please
mark
her
as
present
and
assemblyman
miller
is
here
as
well.
So
please
mark
him.
Present.
Assemblyman
o'neil
had
to
step
away
for
a
few
moments,
so
I
expect
him
to
be
joining
us
soon.
For
now,
please
mark
assemblyman,
wheeler
absent
excused.
I
think
he's
going
to
be
joining
us
a
little
bit
later
and
for
now
please
mark
assemblywoman,
krasner
absent
from
the
meeting.
A
As
I
said,
we
do
have
a
quorum.
I
want
to
wish
everyone
a
good
morning
here
on
day,
four
of
the
81st
session
of
the
nevada
legislature.
Welcome
to
those
who
are
on
the
zoom
with
us
and
welcome
to
those
who
are
joining
us
through
the
internet
on
either
the
legislature's
web
page
or
the
legislature's
youtube
channel.
Before
we
get
started,
I
did
want
to
go
over
just
some
of
our
very
basic
housekeeping
rules.
A
lot
of
you
know
these
already,
but
I
like
to
repeat
them
just
in
case.
A
We
have
new
folks
on
the
zoom,
make
sure
when
you're,
not
speaking,
mutual
microphone,
that
really
helps
with
the
feedback
and
then
really
they're
just
a
couple
others,
first
and
foremost,
we
need
to
make
sure
we
treat
each
other
and
members
of
the
public
with
respect
and
dignity.
In
this
committee
we
don't
always
dis.
We
don't
always
agree
on
issues,
but
we
have
to
make
sure
we're
disagreeing
in
a
way
that
is
respectful
and
worthy
of
the
legislative
institution
and
then
for
members
of
the
public.
A
I
just
wanted
to
inform
you
that,
because
we're
in
this
virtual
zoom
world,
many
of
us
are
dealing
with
several
devices
and
monitors
at
one
time
to
be
able
to
participate,
look
at
exhibits.
So
if
we
have
to
look
away,
please
don't
take
that
as
a
sign
of
disrespect
or
inattention.
Most
likely,
we
are
looking
at
exhibits
that
have
been
uploaded
on
the
legislature's
website,
because
it
can
be
pretty
difficult
to
toggle,
back
and
forth
between
the
zoom
screen
and
the
other
windows
on
the
computer.
A
Okay.
So
with
that
being
said,
we're
going
to
move
on
to
our
agenda
and,
as
all
of
you
know,
the
theme
of
the
2021
legislative
session
is
flexibility,
and
so
today
we
have
two
items
on
the
agenda,
but
unfortunately
we're
going
to
have
to
reschedule
the
presentation
from
the
gaming
control
board
this
morning.
So
look
for
that
to
be
on
an
agenda
in
the
very
near
future,
but
the
good
news
is:
we
do
have
the
cannabis
compliance
board
here
with
us
this
morning
to
give
their
presentation
I'll.
A
Let
the
members
of
the
committee
and
the
public
know
that
you
can
find
the
pdf
of
the
presentation
on
the
legislature's
website
on
nellis,
and
so
what
we'll
do
is
we'll
have
them
present
and
then
we'll
answer
any
questions.
So
I
want
to
welcome
executive
director
climus
to
the
meeting
and
director
klamas.
I
know
you
have
some
other
folks
from
your
team
on
the
meeting
and
when
you're
ready.
Please
go
ahead
with
your
presentation
and
then
we'll,
I'm
sure
we'll
have
some
questions
for
you
at
the
end.
D
Great
well,
thank
you,
mr
chairman
and
members
of
the
committee.
My
name
is
tyler
klimes
for
the
record.
I
am
the
executive
director
of
the
nevada
cannabis
compliance
board.
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
be
here
to
address
the
committee
today
and
give
an
overview
of
the
ccb
and
talk
about
how
this
agency
was
brought
online
over
the
past
12
months.
D
D
As
I
mentioned,
we're
a
new
state
agency
ccp
was
created
through
assembly
bill
533
during
the
2019
legislative
session.
In
fact
chair.
I
believe
that
bill
went
through
this
committee
on
its
way
to
passage
cannabis
oversight.
Nevada's
had
an
interesting
history
in
its
transition
from
the
department
of
health
and
human
services
when
medical
cannabis
was
legalized,
then
to
the
department
of
taxation
in
2017,
when
cannabis
was
legalized
for
recreational
use,
as
laid
out
in
ballot
question
2
in
2016
cannabis,
if
legalized
for
recreational
use
was
to
be
regulated
like
alcohol.
D
In
the
state
of
nevada,
however,
even
in
2017,
there
were
recommendations
that
an
eventual
creation
of
a
single
regulatory
body
to
oversee
cannabis
in
the
state
would
likely
be
necessary.
At
some
point.
The
next
two
years,
2017
to
19,
saw
its
share
of
issues
emerge
in
the
industry
for
those
that
regulate
it.
As
the
legal
cannabis
industry
took
off
the
industry,
frankly
outpaced
and
outnumbered
the
resources
and
capacity
for
what
was
the
marijuana
enforcement
division
to
appropriately
handle
what
was
fast
becoming
and
remains
today,
a
very
complicated
and
high-stakes
industry.
D
The
need,
then,
for
a
new
home
for
oversight,
became
immediate,
so
assembly
bill
533
authorized
the
ccb
to
begin
as
an
agency
on
july
1st
of
2020
last
year.
My
position
was
authorized
to
start
on
january
1st
six
months
prior
to
begin
the
transition
of
cannabis
oversight,
responsibilities
from
the
department
of
taxation,
the
cannabis
compliance
board.
The
ccb
was
to
be
a
new,
centralized
standalone
regulatory
body
to
oversee
the
cannabis
industry
and
work
to
mimic
how
the
nevada
gaming
control
board
regulates
gaming.
D
The
time
frame
in
place
gave
us
a
very
short
runway
to
stand
up
this
agency
and
fully
transition
oversight.
We
began
to
lay
the
framework
for
the
ccb.
We
immediately
faced
a
number
of
challenges.
We
inherited
a
backlog
of
open
disciplinary
cases
that
have
been
untouched.
Some
stretching
back
to
2018.
D
This
review
period
would
last
for
nine
months
until
the
ccb
took
over
in
july,
signifying
that
the
proper
guard
rails
were
in
place
to
begin
moving
forward.
Again,
we
took
over
in
the
middle
of
a
very
public
and
very
arduous
lawsuit
stemming
from
a
competitive
licensing
round
in
2018
litigation
that
saw
both
sides,
the
state
and
the
industry's
reputation
barely
tarnished
moving
forward
to
today.
D
Transitioning
this
oversight
body
and
clearing
the
deck
so
that
the
state
could
realize
a
fresh
start
in
cannabis.
Oversight
was
not
a
small
task.
It
was
accomplished
by
the
incredible
efforts
of
not
only
the
50
individuals
who
make
up
my
staff
at
the
ccp
with
our
partners
at
other
state
agencies
like
the
taxation
department
and
the
attorney
general's
office.
D
D
The
board
is
currently
chaired
by
former
nevada
supreme
court
chief
justice,
michael
douglas,
the
ccb
staff
currently
authorized
at
60
ftes.
However,
with
a
number
of
positions
on
hold
for
budgetary
reductions,
acts
as
the
administrative
arm
of
the
ccp
performing
all
functions
necessary
to
carry
out
oversight
of
the
industry,
I
will
touch
on
our
agency
functions
later
in
this
presentation.
D
D
Now,
as
I
mentioned,
the
ccb
took
over
the
reigns
of
the
cannabis
industry
seven
months
ago,
and
and
with
this
transfer
of
oversight,
we
we
ushered
in
a
new
way.
Cannabis
establishments
were
to
be
regulated.
D
We
aligned
our
operations
in
our
structure
to
adhere
to
the
public
policies
laid
out
by
the
state
in
ab533,
that
is
strict
regulation
of
all
aspects
of
the
industry
and
importance
placed
on
protecting
the
public,
trust
and
confidence
in
a
safe
and
well-regulated
cannabis
industry.
We
developed
our
mission
statement
and
guiding
principles
to
reflect
these
values
and
all
agency
decisions
and
actions
are
run
through
this
document.
D
To
give
you
an
idea
of
some
of
our
agencies,
operations
and
regulatory
responsibilities,
we
regulate
and
oversee
nevada's
739,
operational,
medical
and
adult
use
licenses.
We
promulgate
regulations
within
the
nevada,
cannabis
compliance
regulations,
the
nccr
to
guide
the
industry
and
ensure
licensees
remain
in
compliance.
We
audit
and
inspect
all
licensed
facilities.
This
includes
in-person
audits,
financial
audits
and
in-depth
public
health-focused
inspection
of
facilities.
D
We
conduct
investigations,
both
regulatory
and
criminal
and
work
with
state
and
local
law
enforcement
partners
on
statewide
actions
pertaining
to
cannabis,
related
issues.
We
perform
in-depth
background
and
suitability
checks
on
new
individuals
and
companies
that
are
looking
to
be
a
part
of
this
industry
in
our
state.
We
collect
fees
and
fines.
We
facilitate
meetings
of
the
board
and
the
advisory
commission,
along
with
many
other
duties.
D
Now,
I'd
like
to
touch
a
little
bit
on
the
nccr
again,
this
is
our
core
set
of
regulations
that
guide
the
nevada,
cannabis
industry.
The
nccr
consists
of
14
sections.
It
is
designed
similar
in
format
to
that
of
the
state's
gaming
regulations.
You'll
see
a
common
theme,
as
I
reference
gaming,
quite
a
bit
in
my
presentation.
D
The
original
set
of
nccrs.
This
includes
over
130
pages
of
regulations,
were
adopted
by
the
board
at
its
inaugural
july
21st
ford
meeting.
The
regulations
have
since
been
added
to
and
revised,
and
the
board
will
vote
to
adopt
a
second
set
of
revisions
in
additions
at
its
february
board
meeting
later
this
month.
Now
that
point
is
significant
because
contained
in
the
legislation.
Creating
the
ccd
was
the
recognition
that
the
ccd
must
have
flexibility
to
be
able
to
keep
up
with
the
pace.
D
Demands
of
an
industry
like
the
cannabis
industry
in
nevada
ab533
exempted
the
ccb
from
many
of
the
provisions
in
the
nevada
administrative
procedures
act,
which
means
the
board,
has
the
ability
to
adopt
regulations
and
make
changes
to
much
more
rapid
pace.
Again.
This
process
was
put
into
place
to
mirror
almost
identically,
that
of
gaming's
regulatory
adoption
process.
D
The
legislative
commission
still
has
authority
to
request
a
review
of
any
regulations
that
the
ccp
adopts
before
they're
filed.
However,
our
structure,
a
sort
of
hybrid,
allows
the
board
to
meet
the
demands
of
regulating
this
industry,
as
evidenced
by
the
fact
that
we've
already
made
revisions
and
additions
in
just
our
first
few
months
have
existed.
D
This
kind
of
flexibility
is
not
only
necessary,
but
it
is
crucial
and
it
allows
for
this
agency
to
remain
at
the
forefront
of
industry
regulations
and
further
help
us
achieve
and
maintain
a
gold
standard
built
into
the
nccr
is
also
the
ability
for
any
member
of
the
public
to
petition
the
board
for
a
regulation
change.
This
is
a
tool
that
ensures
the
board
remains
aware
and
can
address
any
issues
currently
happening
in
the
cannabis
industry,
either
from
a
licensee
consumer
or
the
general
public.
D
Now
moving
to
the
organization
of
our
agency
as
part
of
the
development
of
the
ccp,
we
took
a
hard
look
at
the
current
organizational
structure
and
made
significant
changes
to
address
not
only
what
we
perceived
as
upcoming
needs,
but
also
what
we
knew
that
we
would
have
to
accomplish
to
satisfy
the
public
policy
goals.
These
needs
naturally
fit
into
four
divisions
of
the
ccb
administration
and
licensing
audit
and
inspections,
investigations
and
enforcement.
D
D
Our
facility
inspectors
are
all
registered
as
environmental
health
specialists,
allowing
for
in-depth
inspections
on
such
things
as
imminent
health
hazards,
safety
of
ingredients
and
final
products,
sanitation
of
facilities,
use
of
equipment
and
other
public
health
matters.
We
also
have
dedicated
lab
inspectors
in
this
division,
passed
with
examining
nevada's
tin,
certified
testing
laboratories.
D
I
I
began
working
with
former
gaming
control
board
chair
sandra
douglas
morgan,
and
we
worked
out
an
arrangement
for
me
to
essentially
borrow
if
you
will
expertise
in
the
form
of
gaming
staff
to
help
craft
our
new
investigations
and
vision.
It's
a
great
story
because
that
expertise
eventually
joined
our
agency
full-time
and
now
leads
our
investigations.
Division
daily
is
here
with
us
today,
so
reimagining.
D
This
work,
which
is
similar
to
gaming,
includes
now
conducting
in-person
interviews
a
full
suite
of
background
and
due
diligence
checks
and
a
financial
analysis,
our
investigations,
division,
reviews
and
processes
all
transfers
of
interest
requests.
These
are
the
requests
to
either
transfer
ownership
internally
or
to
sell
ownership
to
an
outside
individual
or
company,
all
of
which
did
not
exist
before
the
ccb
took
over
in
july.
D
The
investigations
division
also
reviews
all
management
contracts
and
changes
to
officers
and
board
members.
It
provides
our
board
members
with
comprehensive
investigative
reports
to
help
the
board
make
its
licensing
decision.
Finally,
we
have
the
enforcement
division.
The
enforcement
division
evaluates
all
complaints
made
against
a
licensed
facility,
including
incident
reports
that
are
filed
by
facilities
themselves.
D
The
enforcement
division
includes
post-certified
enforcement
agents
that
also
work
with
our
inspectors
and
auditors.
During
investigations
per
assembly
bill
533,
all
disciplinary
investigations
are
performed
in
conjunction
with
the
nevada
attorney
general's
office.
We
have
two
spectacular
senior
deputy
attorney
generals
assigned
to
the
ccb
and
they
work
with
our
team
to
review
investigations
and
prepare
disciplinary
complaints
when
warranted
the
board
is
the
final
arbiter
in
all
disciplinary
matters
and
has
final
approval
regarding
any
settlement
agreements.
D
Our
enforcement
division
also
partners
with
local
and
state
law
enforcement
on
joint
investigations
and
information
shared
so
now
to
provide
some
some
statistics
and
general
industry
information
and
again
we
are
happy
to
answer
any
follow-up
questions
on
any
of
these
numbers.
As
I
mentioned,
there
are
739
total
medical
and
recreational
operational
licenses.
D
D
D
We
do
not
regulate
hemp
or
cbd
products
produced
from
hemp,
which
you
might
find
in
smoke,
shops
or
stores
other
than
our
cannabis
sales
facility,
cannabis
tax
collection,
which
is
a
function
that
is
handled
by
the
nevada
department
of
taxation.
However,
we
do
work
closely
with
taxation
on
financial
audits
when
necessary
and
to
ensure
our
licensees
are
up
to
date
on
taxes
and
remitted
the
appropriate
amount
of
taxes.
D
D
Finally,
I
wanted
to
give
a
a
brief
overview
of
the
impact
of
covet
19,
how
the
ccb
worked
through
these
challenges
and
how
they
affected
the
cannabis
industry
in
our
state
at
the
end
of
the
day,
and
what
still
remains
today
during
the
continued
crisis,
is
that
coven
necessitated
a
need
for
flexibility
both
within
our
agency
and
within
the
industry.
The
cannabis
industry
was
considered
essential
and
delivery
services
were
left
open
at
the
beginning
of
covet.
However,
retail
stores
were
closed.
D
This
required
a
major
pivot
for
many
of
the
retail
facilities
throughout
the
state.
Now
we
have
always
allowed
delivery
cannabis
delivery
here
in
nevada,
but
when
we
moved
to
delivery
only
in
those
first
few
weeks,
licensees
just
didn't
have
that
infrastructure
in
place
like
vehicles
and
drivers
to
facilitate
that
kind
of
expanded
business.
D
Thus,
the
ccb
developed
a
virtual
vehicle
inspection
process
that
allowed
our
inspectors
to
inspect
virtually
delivery
vehicles
and
approve
them
to
begin
service
in
a
very
short
amount
of
time.
As
we
move
through
the
pandemic,
we
then
developed
a
curbside
pickup
model.
This
was
something
that
was
not
available
to
licensees
before
covid
and
not
provided
for
in
our
regulations.
D
Our
ccb
agents
designed
this
curbside
model,
including
developing
the
rules
and
restrictions
licensees,
would
need
to
follow
and
again
allowed
for
retail
facilities
here
to
pivot
their
operations
further
and
meet
the
needs
of
consumers.
While,
following
our
strict
covert
guidelines,
we
also
lost
in-person
services
for
agent
registration
cards.
These
cards
are
needed
to
work
in
the
industry,
so
the
ccb
developed
a
web-based
agent
registration
card
application
that
replaced
the
outdated
paper
application
allowed
for
a
much
more
streamlined
application
process.
People
started
to
get
back
to
work
on
the
retail
side.
D
The
ccb,
similar
to
many
other
agencies,
was
able
to
issue
extensions
to
its
temporary
approvals,
both
for
delivery,
vehicle,
ids
and
temporary
agent
carts.
Those
extensions
are
both
still
in
effect
due
to
the
continued
health
crisis
so
chair.
That
concludes
my
presentation
and
overview
of
the
nevada
cannabis
compliance
board.
There
was
a
lot
that
I
covered
so
again.
My
staff
and
I
are
happy
to
answer
any
questions
both
today
and
at
any
time
following
this
meeting,
but
with
that
sheriff
appropriate,
I
will
turn
it
back
over
to
you.
A
Thank
you
so
much
director
climates.
We
appreciate
that
presentation
and
before
I
get
to
questions,
I
did
want
to
ask
our
secretary
if
we
could
mark
assemblywoman
kresner
president
and
assemblyman
o'neill
present
as
well,
we're
still
marking
assemblyman,
wheeler
absent
excuse
and
if
he
shows
up
before
the
end
of
the
meeting,
I
will
try
to
mention
that
on
the
record.
A
C
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
I
have
two
questions.
If
that
is,
if
the
chair
will
indulge
me,
thank
you
so
much
director
for
being
here
fascinating
topic
and
I
think
we're
all
aware
of
of
the
changes
that
that
you've
had
to
go
through
since
coming
on
board.
So
thank
you
for
that.
My
first
question
is
in
regards
to
the
black
market.
I
was
just
wondering
if
the
ccb
was
involved
in
investigations
or
how
that
worked.
I
mean
I
as
just
a
person
on
the
street.
C
I
I
see
advertisements
like
billboards
that
are
very
clear,
that
they
don't
have
they're,
not
a
legitimate
dispensary,
and
so
I
was
just
wondering
where
the
role
of
of
the
ccb
in
the
investigations
and
of
the
black
market,
and
then
I
have
one
other
question.
D
Great
well
thank
you,
assemblywoman
and
through
the
chair
to
you
to
answer
that
that
question
the
black
market,
so
the
illicit
market
is
what
we
refer
is
obviously
a
significant
issue.
Our
resources
with
the
ccb
first
focus
on
our
state
licensees
and
what
we
can
do
to
prevent
our
state
licensees
and
our
state
legal
industry
from
bleeding
over
into
the
illicit
market
right
and
we
utilize
the
seed
to
sale,
tracking
system.
D
And
it's
why
our
auditors
and
our
inspectors
go
out
there
inspect,
and
so
I
feel
very
comfortable
that
the
majority
of
our
industry
is
in
compliance
and
is
getting
into
compliance
and
comfortable
with
our
resources
to
be
able
to
prevent
that
blurred
line
or
that
bleed
over
and
that's
number
one
for
us
right.
But
what
you're
talking
about
and
what
is
a
significant
concern.
Is
that
part
of
the
illicit
market
that
kind
of
utilizes
the
legal
market
as
a
shield
right
and
so
billboards?
Yes,
but
we
see
it
a
lot
with
delivery
vehicles
right.
D
So
if
a
delivery
vehicle
pulls
up
to
a
house,
I
mean
from
the
outside.
You
don't
know
if
that
is
illegal,
registered
with
the
ccb
delivery
vehicle
or
not,
and-
and
sometimes
it
could
be-
also
tough
for
the
consumer
to
understand.
Is
this
this
legal
or
illegal
with
ab533?
D
We
were
authorized
for
to
hire
post-certified
officers.
There
were
four
post-certified
officers
in
that
bill,
while
that
is
still
relatively
small
to
to
to
work
statewide.
It
is
a
recognition,
nonetheless,
that
we
will
have
an
enforcement
arm,
and
an
enforcement
arm
should
be
part
of
the
ccp
and
its
makeup
similar
to
that
of
of
gaming,
which
boasts,
obviously,
hundreds
of
of
employees,
but
with
our
post
division,
and
we
have
to
date,
worked
a
lot
with
our
local
and
state
law
enforcement.
Some
of
the
narcotics
teams,
the
multi-jurisdictional
narcotics
teams
that
are
out
there.
D
We
have
a
great
relationship.
We
talk
very
often
and
work
together,
so
utilizing
local
and
state
law
enforcement,
as
we
sit
here
now,
has
kind
of
expanded
our
footprint
for
the
time
being,
but
as
we
get
our
post
division
up
and
running,
we're
going
to
be
able
to
now
go,
engage
on
those
issues
like
delivery,
drivers
that
are
reported
and
sometimes
they're
reported
to
us,
and
so
we've
got
that
that
got
that
heads
up.
D
We
need
those
resources
and
that
that
division
to
go
out
there
and
address
that,
and
so
hopefully
that
answers
your
question.
It's
absolutely
something
that
is
is
is
top
of
mind
for
us
and
something
we
certainly
look
forward
to
to
expanding
our
reach
to
address.
As
the
months
come
along.
C
Well,
thank
you
and
obviously
it's
a
concern
for
us
because
we
don't
want
to
miss
out
on
those
tax
dollars
as
well
chair.
Is
it
okay?
If
I
ask
another
question.
C
Okay,
thank
you
kind
of
switching
gears.
I
know
just
from
asking
around
that
that
licenses
for
dispensaries
are
on
hold.
I
know
to
sort
of
make
those
folks
whole
that
have
taken
a
hit
during
the
pandemic
is
one
reason,
but
I
was
just
wondering
on
the
other
licensing
like
cultivation,
testing
production.
Those
other
licenses
are
those
actively
can
can
citizens
or
you
know,
companies
go
out
and
and
go
to
the
ccb
and
and
have
those
licenses
new
licenses
issued.
D
Thank
you
and
again
chair
through
you
to
the
assembly
woman
so
currently,
and
in
ad533
the
board
was
to
promulgate
regulations
around
new
licensing
rounds
and
that
is
cultivation,
production,
dispensaries
every
license
type
that
has
not
happened
yet
and
there's
a
reason
we're
just
not
at
a
position
to
make
a
decision
on
opening
those
licensing
rounds
and
what
I'm
gonna
reference
here
and
I'll
reference.
A
lot
is
is
that
we
have
to
first
establish
some
baseline
data.
What
we
want
to
be
cautious
of
assemblywoman
is
is
supply
and
demand.
D
Do
we
know
if
our
market
can
can
absorb
new
cultivation
facilities?
You
see
it
in
other
states
like
oregon.
They
have
this
massive
over
supply
and
not
a
demand,
and
that
has
caused
large
issues
for
them.
Also,
you
you
would
assume
if
we
have
too
much
supply
and
not
enough
demand.
Where
is
that
product
going
and
it's
going
likely
somewhere?
D
That's
not
in
the
illegal
market
or
out
of
state,
which
is
an
issue
in
itself,
so
the
board
over
the
next
year
I
anticipate
developing
a
licensing
process
or
or
a
open
licensing
process
to
receive
applications.
It's
going
to
be
very
important
that
we
we
take
our
time
with
this
because
of
that
2018
round.
That's
still,
you
know
partly
under
litigation
that
was
an
open
competitive
round.
There
were
winners,
there
were
losers
and
then
in
it
and
it
it
you
know
it
fell
apart,
which
is
not
uncommon
in
every
every
other
state.
D
I
mean
you
open
a
licensing
round,
you're
gonna
get
sued,
and
that's
that's
just
what
it
is
so
far.
So
again.
Yes,
we
plan
to
approach
that
we
know
we've
got
to
approach
it
sooner
or
later,
but
we
want
to
get
the
data.
So
we
make
good
decisions
on
how
many
licenses
we
open
and
we
want
to
make
sure
our
licensing
process
and
how
we
accept
those
applications
or
those
applications
if
it's
competitive
is,
is
appropriate
and
proper.
So
I
mean
we're
going
to
get
sued
regardless.
A
Thank
you,
director,
climus
and
director
klimas
feel
free
to
go
directly
to
the
members.
When
answering
the
questions,
you
don't
have
to
go
through
me
unless,
unless
you
like
to
do
that,
some
people,
like
the
formality
of
it,
but
it's
not
necessary
in
assembly
judiciary.
A
Before
we
get
to
the
next
question,
I
did
want
to
advise
the
new
members
to
the
committee.
I
know
some
of
our
members
from
last
session
will
remember
that
as
director
climates
mentioned
assembly,
bill
533
was
the
legislation
that
enacted
the
cannabis
compliance
board
and
it
was
really
based
quite
heavily
on
the
structure
of
the
gaming
control
board,
which
we
were
going
to
hear
from
today.
So
that's
why
we
put
these
two
presentations
together,
but
obviously
being
flexible.
A
We
didn't
so,
I
think,
you'll
notice
when
we
hear
from
gaming
a
lot
of
the
same
structure,
with
the
exception
that
I
think
gaming
has
significantly
more
employees
in
their
structure.
But
if
you're
interested
assembly
bill
533,
I
think,
aside
from
the
budget
bills,
was
perhaps
the
largest
longest
bill
of
the
session
weighing
in
at
175
pages.
So
if
you
have
some
free
time-
and
you
want
to
look
at
that,
legislation
feel
free
to
do
so-
I'm
sure
returning
members-
probably
don't
want
to
do
that-
reliving.
Last
year's
hearing.
A
So
thanks
again-
and
so
I
have
a
number
of
of
questions-
still
lined
up
and
I'll
just
kind
of
go
through
the
order
of
how
I'm
going
to
allow
members
to
ask.
So
everybody
knows
where
they
are
in
the
queue
currently.
A
C
Thank
you
chair
and
thank
you
director,
klimas,
for
that
great
overview,
appreciate
that
my
question
is
probably
a
follow-up
to
the
lawsuit
that
you
talked
about
where
we
had
so
many
licenses
issued.
We
had
the
lawsuits.
There
was
a
moving
around
so
to
speak
of
the
licenses,
so
I'm
just
curious.
I'm
looking
at
the
you
know
your
powerpoint
here
where
we
currently
have
739
licenses
statewide
for
the
various
facilities.
How
many
owners
are
there
now
for
those,
because
I
know
they
had
multiple
licenses,
you
said.
D
So-
and
I
may
pull
up
steve
from
my
staff
to
to
be
sure
here
so
there's
232
entities
that
that
oversee
the
the
739
licenses
steve.
Are
you
on
the
line,
steve
heads,
my
administration
and
licensing
steve?
You
probably
looked
at
that
those
statistics
more
recent
than
I
have
if
you
could
provide
some
insight
for
the
assembly
woman,
if
that's
appropriate,
sheriff
that's
okay,.
A
B
Thank
you,
steve
gilbert,
for
the
record
to
you
assemblywoman.
Yes,
director
climax,
is
correct.
There's
about
220
or
so
entities
that
are
licensed
in
the
state
of
nevada
and
there's
approximately
about
700
individual
owners
that
encompass
those
200
or
so
entities.
A
Okay
and
before
we
go
to
the
next
question,
I
just
did
want
to
note
for
some
of
our
members.
A
Some
of
you,
I
think,
are
sitting
a
little
further
away
from
your
computers,
probably
because
it's
weird
to
see
your
face
giant
on
the
computer
screen.
But
when
you
ask
a
question,
if
you
could
get
a
little
bit
closer
to
your
computer
just
so,
the
microphone
can
pick
that
up
clearly
and
our
committee.
Secretaries
can
make
sure
that
they
can
transcribe
accurate
notes.
So
just
make
that
request
when
you're
speaking.
I
know
it's
a
little
odd
to
see
your
giant
face
on
the
screen.
A
A
Yeah,
that's
that's
better
and
you
know
I
I
could
hear
you
okay,
but
they
do
record
the
meetings
and
then
our
poor
committee
secretaries
have
to
go
back
and
listen
and
transcribe.
So
I'll
try
to
remind
members
to
do
that.
I
know
it's
obviously
not
natural,
getting
that
close
to
your
computer
and
speaking
so
if
everyone
can
make
that
effort
and
again
I'll
try
to
remind
folks,
as
we
navigate
this
very
strange
virtual
world,
we're
in
right
now
so
I'll
go
next
to
assemblyman
or
liquor.
A
C
You
chair
and
thank
you
director,
klimas,
for
your
presentation.
My
question
is
about
the
appointees
to
the
board.
You
mentioned
the
governor
appoints
them.
How
long
are
there
terms?
Do
they
serve
at
the
pleasure
of
the
governor?
Do
we
so?
Are
they
overlapping?
When
a
new
governor
comes
in,
what
happens?
Do
we
get
a
totally
new
board
or
just
a
partial
replacement.
D
D
The
bill
authorized
the
governor
to
appoint
three
initial
quote-unquote
temporary
members
for
a
year
term.
That
was
just
to
help
get
the
board
up
and
running,
and
so
that
was
the
chair,
former
supreme
court
chief
justice,
michael
douglas
member
dennis
nylander,
which,
as
you
know,
is
the
longest
serving
gaming
control
board
chair
in
state
history
and
then
member
jerry
merritt,
and
so
they
were
the
first
three.
So
their
terms
are
for
a
year.
They
end
on
july
1st.
D
I
I
fully
expect
them
to
to
realize
a
full
term
come
come
july
and
I
hope-
or
I
hope
they
do
and
then
the
other
two
members
so
remember
brian,
dr
brian
young
and
remember
brianna
durrett,
are
on
the
the
full
term,
which
I
gosh.
I
believe,
five
years
I'll
absolutely
confirm
with
you
on
that
and
and
so
to
also
answer
your
question.
Those
terms
obviously
go
past
any
change
of
of
of
administration.
If
it
happens
that
way,.
E
Thank
you
chair
and
thank
you
for
excusing
me
for
the
first
part
of
this
meeting
director
clemens
I
apologize.
I
may
have
missed
this
because
I
had
some
issues
to
take
care
of,
but
you
have
agent
cards
that
I
understand
out
there
that
we're
supposed
to
or
conduct
background
checks
to
ensure
that
everybody
from
the
front-line
desk
person
to
the
owners
are
secure
in
our
cannabis
sales
and
productions.
E
D
Sure,
thank
you
assemblyman
and
there's
there's
two
components
of
that,
and
and-
and
you
know,
part
of
that
was
due
to
the
transition
from
taxation
to
ccd.
You
know
at
its
face
assemblyman
we
had
a
10
person
in-person,
you
know
walk-in
window
on
the
first
floor
of
the
grand
sawyer
building,
which
was
tax
staff,
so
you
could
walk
in
and
get
your
agent
card
within
an
hour.
D
If
you
didn't
fill
out
the
application
right,
you
could
go
home,
refill
it
out
and
come
back
and
get
it
in
in
three
hours
so
that
we
were
losing
anyway
with
the
transition
to
the
ccb
in
july.
However,
we
lost
that
much
sooner
in
march,
when
covet
happened
and
we
lost
in-person
services
and
so
right
there
that
set
us
on
a
a
mail-in
payment
basis
right.
D
There
was
no
way
to
make
that
payment
and
you
can't
use
credit
cards
because
it's
cannabis
right,
and
so
it's
not
like
you
can
do
online
payments,
yet
we're
gonna
get
there,
and
hopefully,
with
some
kind
of
federal
legislation
and
some
relaxation
on
the
banking
and
financial
services.
We
do
get
there
so
anyway,
that
set
us
back.
Seven
to
ten
days,
which
is
the
time
it
takes
to
mail
in
a
payment
right
away.
We
also
saw
over
2000
applications
a
much
which
was
much
more
than
we
had
ever
seen
before.
D
So
yes,
a
backlog
was
created
about
mid-year
last
year,
where
we're
at
now
is
is
we're
through
that
backlog,
and
that
is
all
kudos
to
the
staff.
Now
you
know,
there's
there's
two
components
so
there's
a
temporary
agent
card
assemblyman
and
then
there's
a
hard
card.
The
temporary
card
which
was
put
in
place
was
to
allow
you
as
a
worker,
to
begin
working
immediately.
D
While
you
wait
for
the
results
of
your
background
check
right
and
that
temporary
card
lasts
for
45
days,
let's
say
until
that
hard
card
is
delivered
so
what's
most
important,
what
we
focused
on
immediately
was
getting
those
temporary
agent
cards
out,
because
that
would
that
allows
a
worker
to
start
work
now
the
hard
card
that
I
wouldn't
even
call
it
a
delay
just
the
time
it
takes
naturally-
and
that
goes
to
the
dps
that
goes
to
fbi
goes
through.
Dps
comes
back
to
the
ccd,
we
review
it.
D
We
attach
it
to
the
application,
then
we
print
your
card
with
your
picture
and
send
it
to
you
and
so
in
the
in
the
news.
You
know
there
were
a
couple
articles
about
this
and
I'm
sure
that's
what
you're
referencing-
and
there
was
this
there
was
this
feeling
that
there
was
a
delay
or
it
took
two
three
months
to
get
a
hard
card,
and
while
that
may
have
been
true,
we
that
didn't
prevent
workers
from
being
able
to
work
in
the
industry.
We
hold
the
key
with
the
temporary
cards.
D
We
can
extend
those
temporary
cards
out
as
long
as
we
need
to
which
we
have.
I
did
talk
about
that
in
the
report
due
to
coping,
so
there
is
no
backlog
on
temporary
cards
other
than
the
seven
to
ten
days
as
long
as
the
application
is
filled
out
right
other
than
the
seven
to
ten
days
it
takes
to
make
your
payment
your
hard
card.
D
Listen
we're
we're
we're
we're
kind
of
at
the
mercy
of
how
fast
the
background
check
process
works,
but
you
know,
I
think,
we're
at
about
60
days
right
now
for
the
hard
part.
E
Let
me
ask
you
on
the
temporary
cards:
are
you
at
least
doing
a
civil
name
check?
It's
called
at
least
running
them
on
the
computer
to
ensure
that
they
have
a
clear
background
and
have
you
looked
for
assistance
safe
from
the
state
division
of
investigation
at
dps
to
assist
you
in
those
follow
up
to
get
them
hard
cards.
D
Yes,
and
and
dps,
we
work
very
close
with
both
ndi
and
the
department
of
public
safety,
assemblyman
and
they're
working
to
modernize
their
records
department
as
well,
and
so
they
have
been.
You
know
fantastic
to
work
with,
and
we've
we've
already
made
some
significant
changes
like
creating
our
own
ori
number.
I
believe
it's
called
with
the
with
the
fbi
and
that
started
to
speed
up
the
process
significantly,
and
so
we
are
seeing
some
some
benefits
of
that.
As
far
as
the
temporary
cards
I
mean
that
was
that
was
put
into
the
legislation.
D
I
I
you
know
that
you
know
to
to
try
to
get
or
to
allow
the
industry
to
to
move
quickly
right
and-
and
so
we
follow
that
as
far
as
the
temporary
cards,
we
don't
have
a
background
check
back
before
you
get
a
temporary
card.
However,
you
do
fill
out
an
application.
D
You,
you
do
a
picture
of
your
id,
so
there
there
are
things
that
you
have
to
fill
out
on
the
application
and
if
you
want
to
know
a
little
bit
more,
what's
on
that
application,
steve
gilbert,
who
runs
that
can
can
talk
to
you
about
it.
But
but
no
there
is
no
background
check
for
a
temporary
agent
card,
but
that's
how
the
process
is
laid
out.
D
B
B
A
Can
can
I
ask
a
couple
follow-ups
on
that
number
one?
I
I
believe
and
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
that
not
all
not
everyone
with
a
criminal
background
is
necessarily
excluded
from
working
in
the
industry.
I
think
it's
only
certain
offenses,
but
I
think
that
the
next
follow-up
would
just
be
in
your
experience.
Doing
these.
How
many
times
have
you
had
that
happen
where
somebody
applies
gets
a
temporary
card,
but
then
they
don't
pass
the
background
check
and
they're.
You
know
essentially
told
they
can't
work
anymore.
A
B
Sure,
steve
gilbert
for
the
record
to
you
chairman.
It
doesn't
happen
very
often
and
what
we
follow
up
on
the
background
check,
if,
if
the
applicant
has
an
excluded
felony,
which
is
defined
in
the
statute
as
a
category
a
felony
and
if
it
falls
into
that
category,
then
we
follow
up
the
applicant
and
revoke
their
their
temporary
authorization.
At
that
point,.
A
And
do
you
know
I'm
sorry,
I
could
look
at
it.
I
just
don't
have
it
off
the
top
my
head,
but
you
mentioned
excluded
felonies
being
category
a
felonies.
Are
there
are
there?
Is
the
excluded
list
broader
than
category
a's,
or
is
that
the
only
exclusion
that
you're
aware
of.
B
Well,
you
might
have
to
go
back
and
think
of
it.
I
believe
it's
just
the
category
a
always
go
over
the
record
to
your
chair.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
I
know
I
don't
have
that
at
the
top
of
my
fingertips
either
I
can
go
back
and
take
a
look.
We
may
hear
some
legislation
on
on
that
topic.
This
session,
I'm
not
sure
yet
depends
how
we
move
throughout
the
session,
but
assemblyman
o'neill.
I
wanted
to
give
you
a
chance
if
you
had
any
other
follow-ups
based
on
the
questions
and
answers.
E
A
Thank
you
and
I
wanted
to
know
before
we
moved
on
to
the
next
question.
I
did
have
a
chance
to
pull
up
assembly
bill,
533
and
all
175
pages
of
its
glory
to
help
answer
the
question
that
was
asked
by
assemblyman
orrin
liquor.
So
in
section
56
of
that
bill,
the
board
members
serve
four-year
terms
that
commence
on
the
last
monday
in
january.
I
don't
see
that
they're
staggered,
but
I
also
don't
believe
that
all
the
board
members
were
appointed
at
the
same
time.
A
So
I
think
in
function
they
probably
were
ended
up
being
staggered
in
some
fashion.
So
if
you're
interested,
you
can
look
at
section
56
of
assembly
bill
533
of
the
2019
session,
that's
the
actual
creation
of
the
board
itself,
so
director
climates.
Hopefully
I
saved
you
a
little
bit
of
homework
on
that
one.
C
Director,
I
just
have
a
question
about
licensing.
What
are
what
are
you
finding
denials
tend
to
be
based
on?
Is
there
any
kind
of
consistency
with
that
that
you're,
seeing.
D
Oh,
thank
you
assemblywoman
denials,
when
you
say
licensing
in
licensing
for
establishments
or
facilities.
For
yes,
yes,
okay,
so
we
haven't
yet
opened
up
a
licensing
round
since
the
ccb
took
over
on
july.
So
no
new
licenses
have
well
licenses,
have
come
on
board,
but
they
had
already
been
approved.
They
were
in
like
a
provision
or
a
conditional
status,
so
we
have
not
yet
had
an
actual
licensing
round
where
we
take
applications
and
score
any
kind
of
applications
and
then
award
either
a
cultivation,
production
or
or
dispensary
license.
A
Okay,
thank
you
for
that.
We'll
go
next
to
assemblywomanhansen.
C
My
question
actually
is
going
to
broaden
a
little
bit
of
what
you
just
gave
an
answer
to
my
colleague,
assemblywoman
cohen,
so
you
haven't
been
doing
any
licenses
and
there
had
been
an
issue
that
when
you
do
a
background
check
for
for
applicants
that
are
going
to
have
establishments-
and
there
had
been-
I
guess-
a
problem
where
the
background
check
wasn't
applying
to
all
the
the
shareholders,
no
matter
how
small
or
big
their
share
was.
C
There
became
a
threshold,
maybe
under
five
percent
weren't
being
background,
checked
and
maybe
some
were
getting
licenses
and
then,
if
we
had
been
thorough
and
background
checked,
there
maybe
would
have
been
four
companies
that
had
been
would
have
been
disqualified.
If
the
information
I've
been
reading
is
correct,
so
going
forward,
have
we
have
we
are
we?
Have
we
fixed
that
that
every
person,
every
person
every
applicant,
regardless
of
their
how
big
their
share
is,
will
be
background,
checked.
D
Great
assembly
woman.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
the
question
and
yes
that
was
kind
of
the
crux
of
of
that
year.
That
was
2018
for
the
cannabis
industry,
but
in
ab533
it
provides
and
and
mandates
the
board
to
to
provide
a
a
a
regulation
around
waiving
and
ownership
or
a
registration
requirement
for
any
ownership
under
five
percent,
and
let
me
explain
that
further
that
the
whole
waiver
requirement
is
necessary
when
we're
talking
about
publicly
traded
companies
right
because
they
can
have
millions
of
shareholders
and
and
you
as
a
member
of
the
public.
D
If
you
buy
two
shares
of
microsoft,
you
are
now
an
owner,
and
so
it
would
be
impossible
for
us
to
to
background
check
or
have
them
register
for
an
asian
card
if
they're
gonna
buy
two
shares
or
they
buy
two
shares
on
tuesday
and
sell
those
shares
on
on
wednesday,
etc,
and
so
the
waiver
requirement
for
those
under
five
percent
is
important.
For
that
reason,
however,
the
board
and
it's
an
authority
and
what's
laid
out
clearly
in
in
the
regulations
the
board,
can
background
check
or
or
demand
any
any
owner.
D
I
don't
care
if
it's
point:
zero.
Zero
zero
one
percent
to
register
with
the
ccp,
because
what
we
look
for
assemblywoman
is
control,
right
and
and
just
because
you
only
have
one
percent
ownership
and
you're
making
this
you
could
be
making
the
decisions
for
for
the
company
we're
going
to
background
check
you
we're
going
to
tell
you
that
you're
going
to
need
to
register,
but-
and
so
we
have
that
power.
We
look
for
that.
D
We
look
through
the
organizational
structures
and
if
you
want
to
know
information
more
information
about
what
we
do
in
those
background
investigations
dailies
here,
he
can
talk
about
it.
But
that's
what
we
look
for.
We
look
for
that
control,
but
the
waiver
requirement
it's.
It
has
to
exist
to
allow
those
big,
publicly
traded
companies
to
to
operate
and
and
obviously
we
don't
have
the
staff
even
necessary
to
try
to
go
after
single
shareholders
that
don't
have
control
and
try
to
background
check
them.
D
So
we
passed
that
regulation
in
july
it's
worked,
we've
given
waivers
to
date;
it
seems
to
to
be
working
and-
and
so
that's
where
we're
at.
Hopefully
that
answers
your
question
but
happy
to
expand
further
on.
A
Hey
thank
you
before
we
go
to
the
next
question,
just
two
pieces
of
quick
business,
mr
gilbert,
if
you're
still
on,
I
just
wanted
to
ask
if
you
could
at
some
point
formally
register
for
the
meeting.
I
think
you
got
a
link
from
our
committee
manager,
bonnie
huffinger
just
so
we
have
your
information.
A
Obviously
we
know
when
you're
on
the
screen,
but
if
you
get
a
chance,
if
you
could
formally
sign
up
for
the
link
and
I'll
sort
of
remind
our
zoom
presenters
as
well,
it
really
helps
if
everybody
can
individually
register
for
the
meeting
on
the
legislature's
website.
Just
so,
we
keep
good
records
and
we
know
how
to
contact
you
if
we
need
to
and
then
for
the
first
time
this
session.
I
want
to
kick
it
over
to
our
very
able
legal
counsel.
A
C
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
Yes,
I
sent
in
the
chapter
definition
of
the
irs
of
excluded,
felony
events
and
basically
stated
it's
a
category,
a
felony,
but
it's
also
two
other.
D
Felonies
there
is
one
exclusion
to
that
definition.
E
C
Criminal
offenses
are
more
than
10
years
old,
then
those
are
excluded
for
defense
could
involve
conduct.
That
would
be
something
to
make
a
meaningful
arrest,
prosecution
penalty,
current
law
because
it
was
illegal
under
the
previous.
A
Law,
great,
thank
you,
mr
wilkinson,
and
we
had
a
little
bit
of
trouble
with
the
end
of
your
audio,
but
I
did
just
so.
The
record
is
clear:
I
wanted
to
note
that
you
can
find
the
information
in
the
definition
of
excluded
felony
in
nrs
678b.050,
so
that
will
be
in
our
minutes
and
if
committee
members
want
to
take
a
look
at
that,
that's
where
you'll
find
it
it
is
in
the
chat
for
you
to
view
as
well.
A
I
also
wanted
to
note
before
we
move
on
that.
I
see
that
assemblyman
wheeler
has
joined
us.
So,
madam
secretary,
if
you
could
mark
assemblyman
wheeler
present,
I
would
appreciate
it
and
welcome
to
the
committee
meeting
assemblyman
wheeler.
We
heard
a
presentation
from
the
cannabis
compliance
board
and
we
are
on
questions
and
just
so
you
know
we
are
rescheduling
the
gaming
control
board
presentation,
so
that
presentation
did
not
happen
this
morning
and
will
not
happen
after
this
presentation.
So
just
be
thinking.
A
If
you
have
any
questions
for
cannabis
compliance
board,
we
have
a
few
more
in
the
queue
before
you.
But
if
you
have
some
questions
we'll
get
to
you
at
an
appropriate
time.
Okay.
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
I
appreciate
it
you're
welcome,
I
think.
Next
we
have
assemblywoman
summers,
armstrong.
E
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
My
question
to
you,
mr
klimas
is
about
diversity
in
the
industry,
I'm
curious
to
know
what
your
application
process
was
at
the
beginning:
the
diversity,
if
you
have
any
data
on
the
original
applicants,
how
what
did
that
look
like
and
have
you
had,
and
and
also
diversity
of
the
employees
that
are
working
in
this
industry?
Thank
you.
D
Thank
you,
assemblywoman,
it's
a
great
question.
I
think
it's
a
topic
that
is
is
top
of
mind
and
we're
going
to
talk
about
it,
probably
a
lot
during
this
session
and
in
the
years
to
come
and
we're
seeing
it
a
lot
in
jurisdictions
outside
of
of
our
state.
To
answer
your
first
question
and
and
that
you
know
that
application
process
predates
me,
but
you
know
I'll
give
you
my
opinion.
Certainly
it
was
a
component
at
best
on
on
on
the
application
it
was,
it
was
to
be
scored.
D
You
know,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
you
know
I
I
think
it
it
really
talked
about.
You
know,
board
members
or
or
representation
of
of
of
of
of
diversity
in
in
minorities
on
those
applications,
but
I
mean
I
don't
think
it
had
anything
to
do
with
ownership
percentage.
You
know
no,
no
profit
share,
which
is
really
what
we're
talking
about
when
you're
talking
about
diverse
ownership,
people
that
are
actually
realizing
the
profits
and
and
and
from
what
I
see.
D
I
don't
see
that
anywhere
on
there,
and
so
we
did
just-
and
this
was
also
contained
in
8533-
we
performed
the
first
demographic
study
of
the
industry
and
we
had
just
finished
that
report.
Assemblywoman
I'll,
send
it
to
you
and
share
I'll,
send
it
to
you
as
well.
If
you
did
it,
we,
I
just
delivered
it
to
the
the
lcb
just
about
a
week
or
two
ago,
and
you
know
it
it.
D
It
looks
at
owners,
officers,
board
members
and
all
of
the
employees
in
the
industry
over
ten
thousand
asking
questions,
demographic
questions
about
race,
and
so
the
results
are
there.
This
is
this
is
kind
of
the
first
step,
assemblywoman
and
really
realizing
it.
So
we
had
almost
100
percent
response
rate
from
owners,
officers
and
board
members.
So
there's
some
good
insight.
It's
not
going
to
be
shocking
to
you,
I'm
sure,
but
there's
good
insight
into
the
results
on
on
owner's
office
and
board
members.
D
I
think
we
got
about
over
5
000
of
our
10
000
aging
card
workers
responded.
So
like
a
50
response
rate.
I
still
think
it
gives
a
picture.
I
don't
think
it's
the
perfect
picture,
but
it's
something
again:
hadn't
been
done
before
and-
and
you
know,
with
diversity
and
equity.
When
we're
talking
about
it,
you
know,
there's
no
perfect
way
to
do
it,
but
you
got
to
take
that
first
step.
D
You
got
to
take
the
first
step
forward
and
you're
going
to
make
mistakes
you're
not
going
to
get
it
right,
so
we
want
to
do
that.
We
want
that
to
be
a
part
and
a
component
of
the
ccb
going
forward
in
licensing
rounds,
but
anyway
I'll
share
that
information
with
you
again.
This
is
something
we're
going
to
continue
to
build
on
and
deliver
that
to
the
legislature,
the
governor
and
the
public.
So
we
can
make
good
policy
decisions
around
diversity
and
equity
in
this
industry.
D
E
You,
mr
klimas
chair,
if
you
could
please
indulge
me
for
a
follow-up
question.
A
Yes,
but
one
second,
let
me
just
make
a
quick
request
director
climates.
If
you
could
send
that
information
either
to
me
or
to
diane
thornton,
when
you
get
a
chance,
we'll
make
sure
we
distribute
that
to
the
committee
members.
I
think
there
were
a
number
of
members
who
are
interested
in
seeing
it
so
hopefully
that'll
save
you
from
having
to
send
it
to
to
everybody.
I
will
send
it
to
you.
Thank
you
so
much
and
please
go
ahead.
Assemblywoman
summer's
armstrong.
E
Thank
you,
chair,
mr
klimas,
and
follow
up.
Does
your
report
address
any
strategies
that
you
all
are
looking
to
undertake
whether
they
are
perfect
or
flawed?
What
are
those
next
steps
and
have
you
all
put
them
in
writing
so
that
we
can
just
have
something
quantifiable
to
follow
up
with
to
know
if
you
all
have
ideas
and
if
you're
able
to
institute
the
ideas
that
you
have.
D
Sure-
and
so
we've
certainly
discussed
it
a
lot
internally
on
on
what
are
some
of
the
opportunities
to
move
on
this
this
quickly.
It's
not
contained
or
ideas
or
suggestions
to
increase
diversity
are
not
contained
in
that
report
assemblywoman.
But
you
know
when
I
went
back
or
when
I
discussed
the
structure
of
the
ccb.
It
included
that
cannabis
advisory
commission,
this
12-person
commission
that
will
make
regulatory
recommendations.
D
D
Listen
I
mean
it's:
it's
not
lost
on
me
that
that
I'm
not
going
to
be
the
expert
right
and
I
shouldn't
be
the
the
expert.
But
what
we
need
to
do
is
clear.
The
pathway,
my
job
is
going
to
be
to
ensure
the
resources
are
in
place.
The
pathway
is
clear
for
the
experts
for
those
who
really
know
what
it
means
to
be
marginalized
or
to
be
affected
by
the
war
on
drugs.
Those
are
the
individuals
that
need
to
guide
our
policy
and
guide
the
state's
policy.
D
So
my
role,
how
I
see
it
is
to
just
put
those
pieces
in
place,
make
sure
those
conversations
are
happening
and
make
sure
the
experts
are
the
one
that
are
making
those
kind
of
recommendations.
You
know
not
me
and
my
deputy
in
our
office,
but
so
hopefully
that
that
helps
answer
your
question.
I'm
telling
you
it's
going
to
be
a
big
topic
for
now
and
going
forward.
You
see
it
at
all
levels:
state
and
federal
government.
A
And
you
know,
just
by
way
of
preview
committee,
I
hesitate
to
say
things
will
happen
for
sure,
because
this
is
2021
session
and
nothing
is
certain,
but
I
hope
to
be
able
to
work
on
some
legislation.
This
session
relating
to
consumption,
lounges
social
use,
venues
we'll
just
leave
it
at
that,
and
you
know
I've
had
discussions
with
a
lot
of
folks
about
how
we
might
be
able
to
use
that
bill
to
bring
in
people
into
the
industry
who
were
excluded
initially-
and
you
know-
have
traditionally
been
excluded
from
these
opportunities.
A
So
I
think
you
know,
as
as
director
klima
said,
I
I
also
agree
that
we
we
have
a
lot
of
work
to
do
in
this
area.
It's
not
an
issue,
that's
unique
to
nevada,
I
think
every
state's
sort
of
grappling
with
it,
but
certainly
we'll
try
to
advance
some
good
policies.
This
session,
that
assemblyman
wheeler,
I
think
you're
unmuted
so
now,
you're
muted.
Thank
you.
We'll
try
to
advance
some
of
those
policies,
and
you
know
we'll
look
forward
to
getting
that
report
and-
and
you
know
in.
C
A
Conversations
with
director
climates,
I
know
that
he
shares
a
desire
to
to
open
the
industry
into
to
more
folks
and
those
who
have
been
traditionally
excluded
so
hopefully,
as
part
of
this
committee,
we'll
have
a
chance
to
do
that
this
session
and,
as
I'm
sure
it's
something
we'll
continue
to
work
on
well
beyond
this
session
of
the
legislature.
A
Okay,
so
again
I
have
some
questions,
but
I'm
going
to
hold
off
for
a
moment
to
see.
Are
there
any
other
members
that
have
questions?
If
so,
just
kind
of
show
me
hand
raised,
I
think
I've
got
okay.
I
see
a
couple
more.
I've
got
everyone
on
one
screen.
Finally,
so
that's
nice,
so
it
looks
like
we
had
assemblywoman
hardy,
so
we'll
go
to
assemblywoman
hardy
and
then
we'll
go
to
assemblywoman
kasama
assemblywoman
hardy.
Please
go
ahead.
B
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
I
just
wanted
had
a
few
questions
about
the
enforcement,
so,
since
the
formation
of
the
compliance
board,
do
you
have
any
information
of
like
how
many
complaints
have
been
filed
and
then,
if
they're,
a
dollar
amount
of
any
fines
that
have
been
collected,
any
suspensions
or
revocations
of
licenses?
Since
the
formation
of
the
board.
D
Sure,
thank
you,
assemblywoman
and,
and
yes,
and-
and
you
know,
transparency
and
accountability
is
something
that
is
is,
is
crucial
and
and
so
important
to
this
agency,
given
where
we've
come
from
in
the
reputational
challenges
of
this
industry
and
oversight,
and
so
complaints
and
disciplinary
matters
were
never
really.
D
Certainly
they
would
go
maybe
in
front
of
the
tax
commission
right
for
for
final
approval
on
a
seller.
They,
nobody
ever
really
knew
if
they
were
happening
and
they
were
to
some
degree
right,
but
it
was
all
kind
of
behind
closed
doors,
and
so
I
say
that
because
on
our
website
and
I'll
talk
about
it,
but
on
our
website,
all
complaints
are
listed.
All
settlements
are
listed,
all
dispositions
everything
is
out
in
the
open
and
and
it's
the
purpose
and
the
point
of
the
ccp.
D
So
I
I
I
preface
what
I'll
say
with
that,
but
yes,
at
the
first
board
meeting,
for
example,
the
very
first
board
meeting
in
july,
we
issued
a,
I
believe
it
was
a
1.25
million
dollar
fine
to
a
licensee
that
had
14
licenses
and
revoked
six
out
of
those
14
licenses
due
to
some
fairly
egregious
actions
that
that
were
going
on
at
those
facilities.
D
Since
then,
we've
had
a
number
of
complaints,
a
number
of
different
finds
that
vary
in
in
different
levels,
they're
all
online.
As
soon
as
the
the
board
approves
the
issuance
of
a
complaint,
it
is
published
online.
The
complaint
in
its
entirety
when
that
complaint
is,
is
resolved,
whether
through
settlement
or
a
hearing
with
the
administrative
law
judge.
That
disposition
is
also
posted
online.
D
As
soon
as
it
happens,
and
so
we've
just
really
tried
to
maintain
and
bring
that
out
into
the
public,
given
kind
of
where
we
came
from.
B
Thank
you.
I
appreciate
that
and
certainly
appreciate
the
transparency
piece.
I
think
you
know
we
all
in
in
all
areas
really
like
transparency,
and
so
I
appreciate
that
they
are
on
that
and
posting
those
things
so
that
the
public
is
aware,
and
so
thank
you
for
those
answers.
Thank
you.
C
A
I
can
hear
you
just
fine
and
I'll
just
I'll
I'll,
ask
my
committee
manager
to
let
me
know
by
chat
if
she
can't,
but
I
can
hear
you
fine,
so
please
go
ahead.
Trying.
C
To
figure
out
the
best
best
way
to
do
this,
so
this
is
just
kind
of
a
background
information
for
me,
I
noticed
that
the
cbd
products
and
the
hemp
are
not
controlled
by
the
board,
are
those
things
that
should
be
under
the
board
or
you're
satisfied
that
they're
not
under
control.
It's
fine,
fine,
like
one
is
department
of
agriculture,
and
you
know
one
is
health
departments
that
you
know.
It's
part
of
the
plan
should
all
be
under
one
jurisdiction
or
just
curious
about
the
history
of
that.
Why?
It's
not.
D
Sure
the
history
on
why
it's
it's
not
I
mean
you
know,
I
think
it's
just
what
what
industries
they
they
touch
on.
So,
like
hemp,
is
really
agriculture
based.
I
I
don't
know
why
it
was
you
know
it's
I
mean
it
makes
sense
to
me.
I
don't
know
what
the
mechanics
were,
but
it
makes
sense
that
that
that
hemp
is
under
the
department
of
agriculture.
Cbd
is
this.
You
know
product
that's
contained
in
in
in
lotions
and
things
like
that
and
it's
it's
not
really
regulated
at
the
the
federal.
D
Well,
it's
not
regular
at
the
federal
level,
and
I
I
don't
know
how
it's
regulated
at
the
state
level
either-
and
I
know
my
staff
is
cringing
as
I
as
I
talk
about
this
as
far
as
keeping
them
all
under
one
one
tent.
I
mean
they're
just
so
very
different.
There's
a
lot
of
similarities,
there's
a
lot
of
confusion.
You
know
it's
it's
easy
to
lump
them
all
in
together
and
that's
just
not
not
the
case.
D
There's
just
so
many
differences,
but
you
know
lumping
them
all
under
one
would
be
a
a
beast
of
a
of
an
a
agency
because
of
the
the
intricacies
I
think
department
of
agriculture
does
a
great
job
regulating
them.
They've
promulgated.
I
know
a
ton
of
regulations
after
hemp
was
legalized
at
the
federal
level
and
we
work
very
closely
with
the
department
of
agriculture.
You
know,
like
our
testing
laboratories,
have
play
in
all
three
of
those
things.
D
So
there's
natural
crossover,
I
think
the
I
think
the
elephant
in
the
room
is
the
is
the
cbd
which
I
imagine
is
probably
going
to
be
a
topic
for
this
legislative
session
as
well.
I
believe
it
was
in
2019,
but
that
is
that
is
just
a
a
interesting
gray
area,
with
the
fact
that
there's
there's
state,
cbd
or
or
or
cbd,
developed
in
the
state
and
cbd
from
outside
of
the
state
and
other
countries
that
can
be
purchased.
You
know,
and
you
can
get
it
delivered
by
amazon
tomorrow,
who
regulated
what's
in
there.
D
You
know
we
don't
we
don't
know,
but
I
support
I
certainly
support
a
good
home.
A
regulatory
body
that
would
oversee
certainly
we'd,
have
some
kind
of
connection
to
that.
Sorry,
if
that
wasn't
a
great
answer
for
you,
but
if
you
want
to
know
the
mechanics
and
more
about
the
composition
of
cbd
and
him
cara
cronkite
from
my
staff
would
be
happy
right
now
to
talk
through
that.
If
you
have
any
follow-up
questions.
E
D
Thank
you
for
the
questions.
So
there
are
10
licensed
testing
facilities
for
cannabis
in
the
state
assemblyman.
We
we
license
them
just
like
we
license
any
other
licensed
types.
There
are
some
restrictions
right,
so
they
can't
also
have
ownership
in
a
facility
if
they
run
a
lab,
but
we
license
them.
We
audit
them,
we
inspect
them.
Just
like
other
facilities,
and
I
mentioned
we've
got
a
small
but
mighty
team
of
of
lab
inspectors.
Who
are
incredible.
D
I
think
some
of
the
best
in
the
nation-
and
I
have
to
tell
you
some
of
our
lab
regulations-
are
some
of
the
most
extensive
in
the
nation,
and
you
know
you
see
other
jurisdictions
when
when,
when
things
get
difficult-
or
you
know
certain
instances
of
of-
I
don't
know
chemicals
or
or
come
up,
they
just
they
stop
testing
for
it.
As
an
answer,
we've
never
done
that
in
nevada.
We
take
it
very
seriously.
We
consider
labs
as
the
gatekeepers
of
the
industry.
D
I
talk
about
it
a
lot
and
they
are
the
protector
of
the
health
and
safety
of
consumers,
both
medically
and
recreationally.
They
are
the
ones
that
ensure
that
that
product
is.
Is
safe,
and
so
if
I
could
have
an
entire
lab
division,
I
I
would
love-
and
I
hope
I
have
it
one
day,
but
yes,
they
are
licensed
just
like
any
other
establishment
by
the
ccb.
E
D
So
so
not
not
exactly,
and
and
so
what
the
state
lab
is
going
to
allow
us
to
do
is
going
to
be
on
inspections
and
investigations.
The
independent
labs
will
always
exist
because
they
test
product
and
they
test
massive
amounts
of
product
every
day,
right,
that's
their
their
business
model
and
there's
there's
ten
of
them.
What
we
need
the
state
lab
for
what
we,
what
I
mean
is
is
to
ensure
that
they're
testing
correctly
right.
D
Certainly,
we
can
watch
their
process.
We
can
critique
their
process
from
that.
But
but
if
we
want
to
know
if
they're
passing
product
that
shouldn't
be
passed
or
they're
saying
that
there's
not
mold
or
yeast,
but
there
is
molar
yeast.
Obviously
we
can't
confirm
that
unless
we
test
it,
but
because
we
don't
have
a
state
lab
our
only
option
and
we
we
exercise
this
option.
A
lot
is
to
send
that
then
to
another
one
of
the
10
labs
to
get
it
tested.
D
So
they're
testing,
one
of
their
other
labs,
essentially
a
competitor's
test,
and
so
we
do
secondary
and
tertiary
testing.
So
then
we
send
it
to
a
third
lab
just
to
ensure
that
it's
impartial
to
be
able
to
check
their
results
same
thing.
If
we
were
to
go
to
a
dispensary
and
do
a
spot
check
on
product
which
we
do
we
have,
we
have
to
send
that
to
one
of
our
state
licensed
labs.
They
see
the
product,
they
know
where
that
products
come
from.
It's
just
it's.
You
know
it.
D
It
works
we're
able
to
retest
and
test
and
we
get
those
results
but
having
a
state
lab.
So
we
have
our
chemists
our
processes
that
we
can
take
any
product,
send
it
to
our
lab,
and
we
know
exactly
you
know
what
that
product
should
have
contained
if
it
should
have
passed
or
failed,
and
it's
it's.
Our
people
are
the
ones
that
are
confirming
those
kinds
of
results,
hopefully
that
that
that
makes
sense
or
clarifies
it.
I
know
director
tagliati
talked
a
little
bit
about
it
in
the
committee
yesterday.
D
Thank
you,
gentlemen,
and
I
would
just
add
we
have
we.
I
participate
on
a
quarterly
lab
call
with
all
of
the
local
labs,
and
it's
not
that
they
it's
not
that
we
don't
send
it's
just
they.
They
can't
test
for
what
we
test
for
and
it's
the
same
with
department
of
agriculture
does
have
a
lab,
but
they
don't
test
for
or
they
at
least
don't
test
for
all
the
components
that
we
test
for
heavy
metals,
aspergillus,
yeast
and
mold.
D
It's
not
just
about
thc
content
or
at
some
of
the
local
labs
and
and
it's
either
cannabis
or
it's
not
cannabis
right.
That's
not
the
test,
we're
looking
for
we're
really
trying
to
get
down
to
the
granular
level
on
that,
and
it
did
the
capacity
they
couldn't
do
it
if
they
wanted
to
and
they
they
know
that
and
they
support
us
as
as.
A
Chair
any
other
questions
from
committee
members.
A
Okay,
I'm
going
to
take
a
chance
to
ask
a
couple
committee
again.
I
think
I
had
like
eight
questions
and
you
all
asked
like
six
of
them,
so
that
makes
me
feel
like
we're.
On
the
same
page,
I
appreciate
that
director
climates.
I
think
my
questions
will
be
pretty
easy.
The
first
one
was
just
on
the
advisory
committee
that
you
noted
in
your
presentation.
I
just
wanted
to
ask
for
an
update
on
the
formation
of
the
advisory
committee.
Is
it
up
and
running?
D
Sure
so
I
think
we're
very,
very
close.
First
order
of
business
was
to
stand
up
the
board.
Obviously,
eight
gubernatorial
appointments
on
a
12-member
commission
takes
a
little
bit
more
more
time,
but
I
think
we're
very,
very
close
here
and
we'll
see
it
in
the
very
near
future
that
roster
filled
out
as
far
as
meetings,
obviously
right
in
the
middle
of
session
same
kind
of
staff.
D
You
know
my
staff
that
staffs
the
board
staffs
the
commission
as
well,
and-
and
so,
but
I'm
really
looking
forward
to
it
and-
and
I
think
it
will
be
up
and
running
very
very
soon,.
A
Thank
you
and
then
the
other
question.
I
just
want
to
ask
maybe
a
clarifying
question,
because
I
think
there's
always
some
confusion
around
this,
particularly
in
southern
nevada,
and
that
is
delivery
of
of
cannabis
products
and-
and
I
I
could
be
mistaken
about
this,
but
I
have
some
recollection
that
after
the
pandemic
started
that,
if
delivery
wasn't
allowed,
then
it
then
it
was
allowed.
You
know
to
incentivize
people
not
to
be
going
out
and.
C
A
Congregating
at
businesses,
and
so,
if
you
could
just
on
on
a
high
level,
let
me
know
what
is
allowed
in
the
delivery
space
who's
allowed
to
do
those
deliveries
versus
I
think
we
heard
earlier
about.
You,
know
black
market
activity
versus
you
know,
what's
the
current
status
of
who
is
who
is
not
allowed
or
are
dispensaries
allowed
to
contract
with
third-party
delivery
services,
or
do
they
have
to
have
their
own
delivery
just
that
sort
of
thing
at
a
high
level,
if
you
wouldn't
mind
sure.
D
And
cara
from
my
team
get
get
ready
here.
Delivery
has
always
been
allowed
in
in
nevada.
The
coven
19
obviously
pushed
all
sales
to
delivery.
We
talked
about
the
process.
We
did
to
virtually
inspect
vehicles
to
get
them
out
on
the
road
which
we
did.
We
got
a
number
I
mean
in
the
first
weekend
alone,
chair
150
vehicles
were
sent
in
for
approval.
Our
staff
worked
all
weekend
to
approve
those
virtually
not.
D
I
think
I
think
over
900
was
the
final
number
within
like
the
first
five
six
weeks
we
implemented
curbsiding,
so
delivery,
you
know,
certainly
was
reduced
quite
a
bit
but
cara
from
my
team.
She
is
the
head
of
audit
inspection.
She
can
talk
about
how
dispensaries
utilize
delivery
drivers
and
and
how
they
apply
and
how
they're
registered
so
cara.
If
you're
on
please
go
ahead.
B
Grain
chair
and
thank
you,
dr
klamas.
Yes,
we
do
allow
for
third-party
delivery.
They
have
to
be
contracted
with
the
dispensary
directly.
They
have
to
hold
agent
cards
for
the
dispensary
that
they
are
delivering,
for.
B
There
is
a
list
available
on
our
website
of
all
the
dispensaries
that
offer
delivery,
as
well
as
any
third
car
third
party
companies
that
they
contract
with,
I
believe,
as
of
covid.
Every
dispensary
is
now
offering
delivery,
because
that
was
a
requirement
and
it
has
been
successful
for
the
industry
during
this
time.
B
The
process
involves
the
delivery
vehicle.
Like
a
video
of
the
delivery
vehicle,
they
show
that
it
has
an
alarm
that
there's
a
lock
box
that
is
tethered
to
the
vehicle.
Usually
they
they
physically
drill
them
into
the
vehicle,
and
it
has
a
lot
of
requirements
as
to
visibility
of
products.
You
know
that's
not
allowed.
They
can't
have
anything
on
the
vehicle
itself.
A
Thank
you
and
just
the
record
for
our
committee
secretary,
that
was
cara
cronkite.
I
think
I
hope
I
got
your
last
name
right
speaking.
I
think
I
just
have
one
more.
Hopefully
this
isn't
too
out
there,
director
klamas,
but
you
know
I
just
I'm
under
the
impression
and
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
website
dispensaries
are
allowed
to
sell
product
either.
You
know
on
the
internet
through
an
app.
Obviously
you
have
to
be
in
nevada.
A
You
got
to
show
them
your
idea
all
that
kind
of
stuff,
but
I
just
wondered
you
know
what
what
is
the
current
status
of
allowing
and
try
to
find
the
right
word
for
it,
but
you
know
sort
of
third
parties
who
are
not
directly
involved
in
the
sale
of
the
cannabis,
listing
cannabis,
dispensaries
and
facilitating
orders.
You
know
I'm
thinking
of
like
an
expedia
website
right
which
they
don't
they
don't
fly
anywhere,
but
you
can
purchase
tickets
through
existing
airlines
on
their
website.
A
D
Thank
you.
Sharon
is
clear
and
I'll
have
actually
kara
again
explain
a
little
bit
about
that.
We've
talked
a
lot
about
it.
There's
different
companies
out
there
that
have
applied
and
asked
to
be
able
to
to
use
their
services
like
that.
You
know
just
a
little
bit
of
history
and
why
we
have
to
approach
this
with
with
caution.
Is
that
some
of
these
third-party
platforms,
you
know
used
to
not
only
advertise
legal
product,
but
they
advertise
illegal
product.
You
know,
and
some
of
them
used
to
be.
D
You
know
the
craigslist
or
you
know
illegal
product
and-
and
I
think
we're
moving
away
from
that
as
far
as
third-party
platforms.
But
it
is
something
that
we
approach
with
caution.
It
does
exist
and
cara.
If
you
could
talk
a
little
bit
about
those
those
kind
of
third-party
platforms
that
would
be
helpful.
B
B
So
this
if
the
sale
is
advertised
through
the
third
party
platform,
the
sale
has
to
actually
be
completed
through
the
dispensary
directly,
and
so
what
you'll
see
frequently
is
a
website
that
has
several
different
products
from
several
different
dispensaries
on
their
website.
But
when
you
click
on
a
plot
product
to
order
it,
it
would
link
you
directly
to
the
dispensaries
website
to
place
the
order
through
them
and
through
their
pos.
A
System
you
that
that
makes
sense
and
answers
the
question.
That's
all
the
questions.
I
have
last
call
for
committee
members
any
further
questions,
I'm
seeing
heads
shaking
no,
so
I
think
that
means
director
klimischu
and
your
staff
are
off
the
hook,
appreciate
you
being
here
this
morning
and
presenting
on
the
cannabis
compliance
board
and
I'm
sure
we'll
be
working
with
you
as
we
receive
cannabis
bills
in
the
committee
and
process.
D
A
Okay
committee,
so
that
is
the
end
of
our
presentations
on
the
agenda.
We
are
going
to
go
at
this
point
to
our
public
comment
line.
As
I've
indicated,
we
are
going
to
reserve
up
to
30
minutes
for
public
comment
at
the
end
of
each
meeting.
Each
caller
on
the
public
comment
line
will
have
two
minutes
to
provide
public
comment.
So
bps,
if
you
could,
let
me
know
if
there's
anybody
in
the
public
comment
line
and
if
so,
if
you
could
please
queue
up
the
first
caller.
C
E
Good
morning
my
name
is
mona:
lisa
samuelson,
that's
m,
o
n,
a
l,
I
f
a
s,
a
m
l
and
I
represent
the
medical
cannabis.
Patients
who
live
here
in
nevada
patients
are
very
grateful
for
the
cannabis
compliance
board
for
their
work
to
keep
a
brand
new
booming
cash
only
industry
in
line
as
we
watch
the
ccb
as
the
commission
unfold.
E
We
appreciate
the
complexity
of
the
work
involved,
but
medical
patients
are
still
having
to
beg
for
our
consumer
safety,
because
until
testing
standards
and
testing
methodologies
are
overseen
by
the
proper
channels
of
oversight,
we've
been
let
completely
down
by
the
ccb
and
the
lcb.
Now
let
me
make
this
very
clear
for
the
record
medical
cannabis.
Patients
are
still
begging
for
legislative
help
in
creating
the
proper
laboratory
testing
oversight
that
would
reflect
actual
consumer
safety
for
nevada's
cannabis
products.
C
A
A
C
Chair
she
has
not
called
back
in
at
this
time.
Our
public
comment
line
is
open
and
working,
and
we
don't
have
any
more
callers.
A
Great,
thank
you
so
much
and
miss
samuelson.
If
you
can
hear
me,
thank
you
for
being
here.
I
know
you've
testified
on
these
issues
for
a
long
time
and
feel
free
to
provide
the
rest
of
your
comment
in
writing.
If
you
would
and
I'll
make
sure
that
the
committee
members
received
that
as
you
weren't
able
to
finish
that
public
comment,
so
at
this
time,
we'll
close
public
comment
for
today's
meeting
before
the
announcements
anything
else
from
any
of
our
committee
members,
it's
nice
to
see
you
all
on
one
screen.
A
Finally,
yesterday
there
were
several
screens
and
it
was
difficult
to
see
everybody
yeah.
I
don't
see
anything
else
from
our
committee
members.
So
let's
just
talk
about
the
rest
of
this
week.
As
you
know,
we
don't.
We
do
not
have
a
judiciary
committee
meeting
tomorrow
so
for
particularly
for
our
new
members,
pat
yourself
on
the
back
you've
gotten
through
your
first
week
of
assembly,
judiciary
committee,
things
are
probably
going
to
start
ramping
up
a
little
more.
The
next
few
weeks,
as
I
noted
before
this
committee
is
typically
extremely
busy.
A
So
as
for
next
week,
as
I
indicated,
we
do
have
a
meeting
on
monday
and
it
will
start
at
eight
o'clock.
We
have
three
or
four
presentations
focused
mostly
on
law
enforcement
and
then
our
court
systems
here
in
well
down
in
the
8th
judicial
district
court
in
las
vegas
and
the
second
judicial
district
court
up
in
washoe
county
and
then
we're
working
on
agendas
for
the
rest
of
the
week.
A
As
of
this
point,
I
do
anticipate
we'll
have
meetings
tuesday,
wednesday
thursday,
we'll
have
some
presentations
in
those
meetings,
and
I
am
crossing
my
fingers
that
we
can
start
hearing
some
bills
here
pretty
soon
as
well,
so
that's
kind
of
the
lay
of
the
land.
I
do
want
to
remind
folks
that
you
should
be
getting
bills
coming
to
you
in
the
next
couple
weeks.
A
A
I
think
we
had
a
pretty
good
first
week,
given
this
new
technology
that
we're
dealing
with
and
thank
everyone
for
your
patience
as
we
kind
of
work
through
this,
and
so
everyone
have
a
wonderful
day
enjoy
your
friday
morning
off
have
a
great
weekend
and
we'll
see
you
all
in
this
committee
on
monday
morning,
at
8
o'clock.
This
meeting
is
adjourned.