►
From YouTube: 4/9/2021 - Assembly Committee on Natural Resources
Description
For agenda and additional meeting information: https://www.leg.state.nv.us/App/Calendar/A/
Videos of archived meetings are made available as a courtesy of the Nevada Legislature.
The videos are part of an ongoing effort to keep the public informed of and involved in the legislative process.
All videos are intended for personal use and are not intended for use in commercial ventures or political campaigns.
Closed Captioning is Auto-Generated and is not an official representation of what is being spoken.
A
C
A
I
am
here,
please
assembly,
woman
gonzalez
is
here.
It
looks
like
she's
experiencing
an
audio
issue
and
please
my
consumer
woman
titus
is
excused
and
we'll
mark
oh
looks
like
mr
ellison
is
about
to
join
now,
so
we
can
just.
A
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
mark
him
as
president.
Thank
you
somebody.
Let
me
know
what
we're
if
it's
dead
or
not
dead,
mute
your
video.
Thank
you
all
right
members.
We
have
a
quorum
since
we
are
just
doing
work
session
today.
I'm
gonna
keep
the
housekeeping
items
to
a
minimum
other
than
to
note
that
if
any
members
of
the
public
wish
to
provide
public
comment,
they
can
register
to
do
so
on
the
legislative
website.
We'll
ask
them
to
limit
their
remarks
to
two
minutes
and
then
for
all
members.
A
Please
remember
to
mute
when
you
are
not
on
the
when
you
are
not
speaking
when
making
a
motion
or
second,
please
make
sure
to
provide
your
name
or
otherwise
make
sure
you've
got
my
attention,
so
we
can
get
the
an
accurate
record
and
when
we
vote
roll
call,
please
say
yes
or
no
with
that
committee
we
have
six
items
planned
for
work
session
today
as
a
reminder
when
doing
work
session,
we
don't
typically
take
testimony,
although
we
do
have
some
amendments
that
have
come
in
recently,
so
we
may
have
bill
sponsors
and
other
others
clarify
questions
that
come
up.
A
So
with
that
we'll
begin
our
work
session
with
assembly
bill
102,
which
revises
requirements
for
the
issuance
of
certain
annual
permits
for
entering
camping
and
boating
in
state
parks
and
recreation
areas,
and
mr
stenisbeck,
our
policy
analyst,
will
lead
us
to
the
work
session
document
for
this
bill.
Mr
stenisbeck,
please
proceed
whenever
you
are
ready.
C
A
Certainly
and
the
agenda
does
include
a
possible
work
session
on
other
matters
previously
considered,
so
for
the
edification
of
you,
mr
wheeler
and
members
of
the
public.
We
are
planning
to
work
session,
ab-102,
ab-146,
ab-170,
ab209
ab-356
and
a
b
399
today.
A
E
Thank
you
charwatz
for
the
record
johnston
spec
with
the
research
division
of
the
lesser
of
county
brawl
as
partisan
central
staff.
I
cannot
advocate
for
against
any
metric
for
this
committee
sunday.
Bill
102
was
certain.
This
could
be
on
march
10th,
and
it
removes
the
requirement
for
the
divisional
state
parks
of
the
state
department
of
conservationist
resources
to
impose
an
administrative
fee
on
annual
state
park
permits
for
nevada,
disabled
veterans,
who
can
receive
such
a
permit
free
of
charge,
but
have
to
pay
that
msra
fee.
E
There
was
one
amendment
proposed
by
someone
krasner,
which
would
make
the
following
change:
it
would
remove
the
10
service,
connect,
disability,
minimum
requirement
and
it
reverts
to
the
division's
authority
to
charge
the
illustrator
fee.
I
would
like
to
point
out
that
analyst
should
also
be
email
correspondents
by
administrator
mergel.
A
A
D
D
D
C
A
A
E
The
bill
requires
state
apartment
conservation
and
natural
resources
to
establish
a
program
regulating
water
pollution
resulting
from
diffuse
sources.
There
was
one
amendment
proposed
by
someone
peters,
which
makes
the
following
changes.
It
removes
the
requirement
to
stamp
your
program
to
reduce
control
and
mitigate
water
pollution
from
the
few
sources
and
instead
authorizes
the
department,
in
addition
to
any
controls
prescribed
by
the
commission,
to
develop
plans,
recommendations
and
policies
consistent
with
any
federal
requirement
for
the
few
sources
to
manage
control
and
mitigate
water
pollution.
E
Resulting
from
the
few
sources
provides
that
such
plans,
recommendations
and
policies
may
include
various
areas
of
focus.
That
removes
the
requirement
for
an
applicant
for
general
or
individual
permit
regarding
discharges
or
injection
of
fluids
through
a
will
to
file
a
bond
or
other
authority
with
the
department
and
removes
the
parts
requirement
to
adopt.
Relational
link
to
this
bond
provides
that
the
legislature
declares
that
the
people
of
the
state
have
a
right
to
clean
water,
and
that
is
the
policy
of
the
state
to
mitigate
any
degradation
of
the
waters
of
the
state.
E
Cultural
wildlife
resources
removes
the
requirement
that
any
permit
issued
by
the
department
insurers
that
the
discharge
or
injection
does
not
disproportion
impact
historical,
pressed
or
marginal
marginalized
communities
removes
the
numerical
water
quality
criteria
from
major
categories
of
diffuse
sources
by
the
department
was
required
by
the
commission
to
prescribe
controls
for
the
fuel
sources
and
removes
the
requirement
that
dc
in
our
establishment
continuing
planning
process
that
includes
procedures
for
addressing
the
major
categories
of
our
pollution
from
the
few
sources.
E
Those
proposal
and
changes
are
contained
in
the
markup.
That's
attached
to
this
workstation
document.
In
addition
to
a
mock-up,
there
is
a
conceptual
amendment
which
further
addresses
the
mock-up
and
specifically
replaces
the
term
historically
oppressed
or
marginalized
communities
with
historically
under-deserved
underserved
communities
and
removes
the
changes
to
nrs
445,
a
.490
that
were
proposed
to
be
made.
In
section
7
of
the
bill
with
that,
thank
you,
chair.
A
Thank
you,
mr
stennis
back,
and
we
do
have
assemblywoman
peters
available
to
answer
any
questions.
We
do
have
a
question
I
believe
from
assemblyman
wheeler.
Please
go
ahead.
C
Hey.
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
I
don't
mean
to
take
up
much
time,
but
I
know
we're
in
rush,
but
looking
through
the
amendment
here,
I'm
wondering
I
know
that
the
sponsor
was
going
to
get
with
n-depth
because
they
had
some
concerns
on
this
on
federal
funding,
and
I
really
can't
see
whether
that
changed
or
not
to
be
honest
with
you.
So
I'm
just
wondering
if
the
sponsor
got
within
depth
and
if
their
fears
were
assigned.
F
If
I
may
chair
assemblywoman
for
the
record,
thank
you
for
the
question
and
yes,
I've
been
working
extensively
with
all
stakeholders
on
this
amendment.
As
you
can
see,
it
is
quite
vast
and
trying
to
get
to
everybody's
needs
and
concerns,
and
we
have
gotten
to
the
point
with
ndep
where
they
are
confident
with
the
the
current
language
that
it
won't
inhibit
their
ability
to
get
those
federal
funds
through
the
removal
of
the
obligation
to
develop
regulations
regarding
nonpoint
source
pollution.
A
Thank
you
for
the
question
any
other
questions
for
from
the
committee
on
this.
A
G
A
Thank
you
any
additional
discussion
on
the
motion.
D
D
D
D
A
Yes,
that
motion
carries
I'll,
assign
the
floor
statement
for
this
bill
to
assembly,
lauren
peters
with
assemblywoman
anderson
as
a
backup
with
that
we'll
move
on
to
our
work
session
for
assembly
bill
170,
which
revises
provisions
governing
animals.
Mr
skinspec,
will
you
please
lead
us
through
the
work
session
document
for
this
bill.
E
Thank
you,
chair
for
the
record
against
back
to
the
research
division.
Assembly
of
170
was
hurting
this
committee
on
march
8th.
It
requires
that
a
notice
of
the
right
of
a
person
lawfully
arrested
for
certain
crimes
involving
animals
to
request
a
hearing
also
be
provided
to
a
person
who's
lawfully
issued
a
citation
for
such
violations.
E
Bill
also
clarifies
that
a
hearing
involving
such
crimes
be
held
in
a
court
of
competent
jurisdiction
and
oppose
the
preponderance
of
evidence.
Science
of
proof.
In
such
cases,
in
certain
circumstances
where
the
ownership
of
an
empire
ammo
has
been
transferred,
it
provides
that
the
new
owner
can
may
sell
animal
auction.
You
may
destroy
the
animal
or
continue
caring
for
the
animal
as
on
your
ownership
fits.
E
Lastly,
for
the
bill
clarifies
that
the
state
department
agriculture
is
responsible
for
creating
and
maintaining
a
notice
concerning
an
empowerment
of
an
animal
owned
or
possessed
by
a
person
who
was
arrested
and
detained.
There
have
been
several
amendments
posted
this
bill
from
various
stakeholders,
among
them
the
nevada,
humane
society,
the
city
of
boulder
city,
the
state
department,
agriculture
and
bronze,
and
a
representative
with
bronstein
hyatt
farber
shrek.
The
majority
of
those
amendments
are
attached
to
the
work
session
document.
E
Cases
provides
that
hearings
are
to
be
held
pursuant
to
nrs
574.203
for
a
misdemeanors
in
violation
of
ordinances
of
their
respective
cities,
removes
the
requirement
that
the
state
department
of
agriculture
maintain
a
written
notice
for
certain
empire
animals
and
instead
requires
the
local
detention
facilities
to
oppose
and
maintain
the
written
notice
provided
by
the
state
of
our
agriculture
and,
lastly,
provides
for
a
clear
and
convincing
evidence,
standard
and
reverse
language
concerning
issuing
a
citation
providing
a
hearing
in
a
court
of
competent
jurisdiction.
A
D
A
Thank
you
for
that
question.
Assemblywoman
carlton.
I
may
ask
mr
amburn
to
also
provide
some
clarification.
My
recollection
is
that
there
are
certain
areas
that
contract
with
nonprofits
to
provide
certain
services,
and
this
is
clarifying
that
they
would
be
able
to,
and
they
already
do
have
the
ability
to
issue
to
essentially
act
as
animal
control,
and
what
this
would
do
was
allow
them
to
issue
specific
citations
and,
if
mr
amber
would
like
to
add
anything
to
that.
D
Thank
you,
george
watts,
alan
ambron
for
the
record,
so
looking
at
that
definition
on
page
three
of
five
that
the
assembly
woman
pointed
out,
so
it
does
provide
that
employment,
animal
shelter
could
carry
out
these
tasks,
but
in
order
to
do
so,
they
have
to
be
designated
and
authorized
by
city
or
county
to
do
so.
So
they
can't
do
so
on
their
own
realm
or
their
own
desires,
but
they
have
to
be
designated
and
authorized
by
the
city
or
county.
G
Thank
you,
chair
and,
and
that,
following
along
with
that
line
of
questioning
from
my
colleague,
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
as
well
that,
because
that
was
an
issue
for
me
at
the
beginning
and
urine
was
held
along
with
process
issues,
but
I
know
there's
been
work
done,
and
so
I
want
to
clarify
that.
I
understand
this
policing
powers
so
to
speak.
G
If
I
understand
right
that
an
example
of
when
it's
authorized
as
mr
amber
and
said
by
a
city,
I
think
carson
city,
does
it
this
way
where,
if
they
don't
have-
and
maybe
I
could
address
this
to-
I
think
miss
elliott
is
on
the
on
the
on
the
zoom,
as
she
explained
it
to
me
that
it's
only
when
it's
contracted,
and
only
with
the
approval
of
the
city
governments
is
that
right.
A
H
H
I
believe
that
the
contract-
I'm
sorry
the
mindy
elliot
for
the
record,
through
you,
chairman,
watts,
to
assemblywoman
hanson.
I
believe
that
the
contract
has
been
in
place
for
north
of
at
least
four
years
it
could
be.
I
remember
I
remember,
negotiating
the
contract
with
mayor
crawl,
so
helping
to
negotiate
that
contract.
So
it's
been
in.
It's
been
in
existence
for
quite
a
while.
G
So
this
would
be
really
a
rare
exception.
Am
I
my
kind
of
right
in
understanding
that
most
counties
probably
have
an
animal
control
officer
of
some
sort.
A
This
is
a
chair
watts
I
that
is
correct.
I
know
that
down
in
southern
nevada
we
have
local
governments
have
animal
control
entities,
so
I
don't
think
we
have
a
comprehensive
list
available
at
this
time,
but
in
in
our
major
urban
areas,
our
animal
control
is
and
would
continue
to
be
handled
by
our
local
governments.
It's
not
proposed
to
to
change
that
with
this
bill.
It
just
provides
the
option
for
carson
city,
for
example,
to
to
take
the
route
that
they've
taken.
C
No
thank
you,
mr
chair,
that
opened
up
another
question
for
me:
don't
some
of
these
non-profits
like
the
humane
society?
Don't
they
use
volunteers
in
these
positions?
Who
would
not
be
trained
in
this.
H
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
through
you
for
the
record,
mindy
elliott
represent
with
capital
partners
representative
at
a
humane
society
through
you,
mr
chair
to
assemblyman
wheeler,
the
staff
that
is
representing
the
carson
city.
Animal
control
through
the
nevada,
humane
society
are
all
paid
staff.
There
are
no
volunteers
that
are
that
are
working
in
this
capacity.
They
are
all
trained
professionals
working
in
these
capacities.
C
Okay,
thank
you.
What
about
the
other
counties
or
do
you
know.
H
I
I,
through
you,
mr
chairman,
to
assemblywoman
wheeler,
I'm
mindy
elliott,
on
behalf
of
capital
partners
in
nevada,
humane
society.
I
can't
respond
they
to
the
other
counties.
I
just
know
that
we,
as
the
nevada,
humane
society,
are
the
animal
control
for
carson
city
and
and
part
of
the
reason
that
this
request
is
in
place
is:
is
that
the
current
in
the
current
way,
the
current
law
is
our
staff
who
are
serving
on
behalf
of
carson
city?
H
If
there
is
an
issue,
we
actually
have
to
take
a
sheriff
off
of
the
streets
and
have
them
meet
our
animal
control
officer
in
order
to
issue
a
citation,
and
it
was
deemed
that
it
would
be
a
better
use
of
the
sheriff's
time
to
not
have
to
to
to
serve
the
people
in
a
better
way
than
to
to
meet
our
animal
control
officers
who
are
trained
and-
and
it's
only
very
specific
for
any
type
of
animal
issues.
D
A
A
I
Thank
you
for
recognizing
me
chair.
I
have
not
been
involved
in
this
book,
but
I
and
the
negotiations,
but
I
do
remember
this
from
last
session,
and
you
know
this
is
one
of
those
issues
where
there's
not
really
perfect
answers
and
we're
not
going
to
get
to
where
we
need
to
be
to
have
all
those
concerns
addressed
100
for
everyone.
I
think
I'm
you
know,
but
considering
that
we're
dealing
with
limitations
on
the
system
for
the
for
the
counties,
rights
of
owners,
welfare
of
the
animals.
I
Let
me
I
just
appreciate
the
work
that's
been
done
and
and
think
that
we're
you
know
I
I
don't
want
the
the
what's
the
perfect
to
be
the
enemy
of
the
good
and
and
so
I
really
appreciate
that
and
thank
you,
assemblywoman
martinez
and
and
for
everyone
else.
Who's
been
involved
that
clearly
have
been
working
very
hard
on
this.
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
A
E
Thank
you,
chairwatch
for
the
record
young
synthetic
on
the
research
division
of
lcb
sunday
bill
209
with
certain
committee
on
march
31st.
It
prohibits
a
person
from
removing
or
disabling
the
class
for
cat,
except,
if
necessary,
to
address
the
physical
medical
condition
of
the
cat.
The
bill
specifically
prohibits
a
person
from
removing
or
disabling
the
class
of
a
cat
for
cosmetic,
aesthetic
or
convenience
reasons
in
keeping
or
handling
the
cat.
E
The
bill
requires
license
veterinarian,
who
determines
the
removal
or
disability
disabling
of
the
clause
of
the
cat
is
necessary
to
address
the
physical
medical
condition
of
the
cat
to
prepare
and
file
a
written
statement
with
the
nevada
state
board
of
veterinary
medical
examiners
and
to
provide
the
statement
before
performing
the
procedure
or
in
the
case
of
an
emergency
not
later
than
five
days
after
performing
a
procedure.
Lastly,
bill
prohibits
civil
penalties
and
provides
that
a
licensed
veterinarian
who
violates
any
provisions
of
this
bill
is
subject
to
disappointing
action
by
the
board.
E
There
was
one
minute
proposed
by
this
one
man
proposed
by
this
committee,
which
removes
the
requirement
of
a
license
veterinarian
to
provide
a
written
statement
to
the
msa
board
of
veterinary
medical
examiners,
along
with
the
corresponding
civil
penalties,
and
this
is
only
in
its
conceptual
form,
and
I
believe
there
has
also
been
a
correspondence
on
the
issue
of
the
fiscal
note
from
the
board.
However,
that's
not
up
announced
at
this
time.
Thank
you,
chair.
G
Thank
you
chair,
I'm
chatty
today.
So
remember,
my
cats
are
not
declawed,
but
I'm
going
to
be
a
no.
I
I
would
prefer
a
different
route.
I
think
education
works
wonderfully.
It
works
great
with
spay
and
neutering
and-
and
it's
also,
I
think
it
would
work
here.
I
think
a
lot
of
people
are
becoming
more
and
more
aware,
so
I'm
not
a
fan
of
the
band,
but
I
appreciate
the
work
appreciate
the
opportunity
for
from
all
of
us
to
get
more
educated
on
this
and
hope
the
education
continues.
Thank
you.
A
No,
I'm
sorry.
Yes,.
D
F
D
C
A
Yes
and
just
to
confirm,
we
are
taking
a
vote
on
assembly
bill,
209,
assemblyman,
wheeler
or
someone
else.
I
apologize.
What
is
what
is
your
vote?
Can
you
clarify
it
for.
A
A
E
Thank
you,
chair
watts,
for
the
record
against
inspect
with
the
research
division.
It's
on
bill
356
that
was
hurting
his
company
april
5th,
and
it
creates
a
voluntary
program
for
the
conservation
of
water
and
the
account
for
purchasing
and
retiring
water
rights,
and
it
will
authorize
the
state
engineer
to
purchase
and
retire
certain
water
rights
with
money
from
the
account
there
is
an
amendment
or
actually
two
amendments.
The
first
proposed
by
simon
watts,
which
is
a
mock-up
and
then
there's
a
conceptual
amendment.
E
In
addition
to
this
by
the
southern
nevada
water
authority
and
the
amendment.
That's
the
following
removes
the
provisions
concerning
the
voluntary
program
for
the
conservation
of
water
and
the
account
for
purchasing
retiring
water
rights,
and
then
it
prohibits,
with
certain
exceptions,
the
waters
of
the
colorado
river
that
are
distributed
by
the
southern
water
authority
from
being
used
to
irrigate
non-functional
turf
with
any
property
that
is
not
zoned
for
the
exclusive
use
of
a
single
family
residence.
E
These
definitions,
through
the
service
rule
of
its
member
agencies
and
develop
a
plan
to
identify
and
facilitate
the
removal
of
existing
non-functional
turf
on
property,
is
not
zoned
for
the
exclusive
use
of
a
single
family
residence
by
december
31st
2026
authorize
the
board
of
directors
to
approve
an
extension
or
waiver
for
these
prohibitions
and
creates
the
non-functional
turf
removal
advisory
committee
to
provide
recommendations
to
the
board
of
directors
regarding
turf
removal.
As
a
minus
danny
there's
an
additional
amendment
to
this
bill,
that's
unfortunately
not
part
of
the
work
session
document.
E
However,
it
should
be
up
on
alice
now,
and
the
amendment
was
also
proposed
by
this
committee
and
it's
it's
an
addition
previously.
That
is
an
addition
to
the
markup.
That's
attached
to
the
work
such
document.
E
The
proposed
amendment
seeks
to
require
the
lsat
committee
on
public
lands
to
conduct
and
study
during
the
2021-2022
interim
concerning
water
conservation
in
the
state.
This
proposed
amendment
seeks
to
require
the
last
day
public
lands
to
submit
a
report
to
the
director
of
the
last
day
of
council
bro
honor
before
february
1st
2023,
and
to
transmit
to
this
82nd
session
of
the
last
lecture.
Thank
you,
chair.
A
Thank
you,
mr
stennis
back,
and
just
to
make
this
extremely
clear
for
members
of
the
committee.
The
original
language
of
assembly
bill
356
is
being
removed
under
this
proposed
amendment.
A
We
do
have
the
folks
from
the
division
of
water
resources
available.
If
folks
have
any
questions
or
if
there's
anything
that
they
would
like
to
add.
G
I
think
it
was
an
amendment.
I
had
the
amendments
on
that
one
anyway.
Let
me
go
to
my
questions,
so
I
just
want
to
clarify
yeah.
This
bill
is
essentially
everything's
gone,
except
sections
36
through
42
and
now,
instead
of
being
the
original
bill
that
we
had
kind
of
talked
a
lot
about
at
the
hearing.
Now
it's
just
sections
36
to
42,
dealing
with
southern
nevada,
water
authority
and
that's
distribution
of
water
and
prohibiting
it
for
non-functional
turf
issues.
G
And
what
else
did
I
have
a
question
on,
but
is
the
two-thirds
gone.
A
Thank
you
for
that.
Those
questions,
someone
hansen
I'll
just
clarify
again.
Yes,
the
entire
conservation
credit
program
is
removed
under
the
proposed
amendments,
and
that
does
remove
the
two-thirds
requirement
on
the
bill
and
we
do
have
southern
nevada
water
authority
available
as
well.
If
anyone
has
questions
for
them,
you
have
an
additional
question.
D
A
I
Thank
you
chair,
and
I
I'm
sorry
I
didn't
think
to
raise
this
this
sooner,
but
it
just
kind
of
hit
me
as
we
were
going
through
it
during
the
work
session,
and
I
guess
I
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
the
subcommittee
is
is
cognizant
of
multi-family
dwellings,
because
when
I
was
thinking
about
what
we're
doing,
I
was
just
thinking
about
single
family
and
then-
and
I
know,
there's
a
difference
between
park
under
this,
for
instance,
parks
at
an
apartment,
complex
and
green
belts,
but
I
think
for
some
of
those
families
in
the
in
the
multi-family
dwellings,
those
green
belt
areas,
maybe
more
functional
to
them
than
people
who
live
in
houses,
realize
and
and
and
so
yeah.
I
A
Thank
you
vice
chair,
cohen
and
yeah.
This
is
a
little
bit
more
discussion
on
the
item,
but
I
believe
the
language
specifically
addresses
non-functional
turf.
It
addresses
turf
that
is
not
in
residential,
so
that
includes
single
family
and
multi-family
areas
and
in
addition,
the
the
committee
that
is
proposed
would
include
all
the
stakeholders
that
are
affected
to
determine
exactly
what
uses
are
functional
and
not
and
and
to
allow
the
use
of
areas
that
actually
do
serve
a
function
other
than
ornamental.
I
And
for
me
thank
you,
chair
and,
and
I
am
and
I'm
sorry
I
guess
I
I
misread,
because
I
thought
I
did
read
in
something
about
specifically
single
family
and
maybe
just
in
the
rest
of
the
work
session.
I
wasn't
catching
exactly
how
this
played
into
there
and
and
again.
I
I
guess
my
point
is:
is
that
sometimes
that
stuff
that
that
may
look
just
ornamental
in
in
the
multi-family
homes
actually
is,
is
more
than
that
for
the
people
who
live
there,
but,
but
certainly
I
support
this
and-
and
you
know
like
I
said,
just
want
to
put
that
out
there
for
the
subcommittee
to
consider
as
they
work
forward,
should
this
this
bill
pass.
So
so
thank
you
for
the
time.
A
Thank
you
very
much
and
there
will
be
a
full
hearing
on
this
in
the
senate
and
then,
assuming
that
it
is
passed
into
law.
This
committee
will
further
dig
into
those
issues
in
a
in
a
public
and
open
process.
B
D
G
D
A
A
E
The
bill
requires
a
farm
owner
or
operator
to
go
through
a
cage-free
certification
process
to
the
state
department
of
agriculture.
The
bill
prohibits
a
business
owner
operator
from
selling
offering
or
exposing
for
sale
or
transferring
for
sale,
eggs
that
the
business
owner
operator
knows
or
should
have
known,
were
not
produced
in
a
caged
free
housing
system.
E
A
Thank
you,
mr
stenisbeck,
and
just
to
clarify
this
is
essentially
the
same
amendment
as
was
presented,
except
with
the
change
to
essentially
the
effective
date
which
addresses
the
concerns
that
were
brought
up
by
the
retail
association,
restaurant
association,
chamber
of
commerce
and
others
in
neutral
members.
Are
there
any
additional
questions
assembly
women
hanson
go
ahead.
G
Thank
you
again
chair.
I
do
have
questions,
I
don't
know
if
it's
maybe
directed
for
for
legal,
and
I
see
director
ott
here
in
the
zoom.
I
appreciate
you
being
here.
Thank
you.
So
in
section,
17
is
the
section
that
talks
about
it's
illegal
to
sell
eggs
without
a
certificate
in
the
state
of
nevada.
So
we
know
there
are
egg
there
are.
G
So
if
it's
illegal
to
sell
eggs
without
a
certificate
and
then
we're
if
this
bill
passes
and
we're
going
to
have
to
go
to
the
regs,
then
and
and
start
developing
that
process
and
have
certification,
are
we
to
be
assured
that
these
people
that
have
eggs
out
there
now
are
not
going
to
be
charged
for
certification
and
also
in
the
next
section?
It
talks
about
inspections
and
having
an
inspector
in
the
state.
G
So
is
that
I'm
just
not
seeing
how
those
who
have
egg
situations
that
they're
on
their
own
properties
here
in
nevada
are?
Are
they
going
to
be
exempted
from
getting
certified
or
inspected?
Are
they
going
to
have
to
pay
to
do.
G
A
Thank
you.
I
was
on
mute.
I
actually
would
like
to
ask
director
rot
to
respond
to
your
questions,
some
of
them,
and
I
think
the
broader
point
that
you're
getting
to
is:
does
this
expand
the
existing
regulatory
footprint
of
the
department
over
egg
production?
In
other
words,
is
there
anyone
who
is
producing
eggs
right
now,
who
does
not
have
to
go
through
a
certification
or
other
processes
with
the
department
that
would
where
this
bill
to
be
enacted.
F
All
right,
thank
you
chairman.
This
is
jennifer
director
of
the
department
of
agriculture,
hello,
assemblywoman,
hanson,
it's
nice
to
see
you
yes.
So
the
answer
to
your
question
is
that
egg
producers
in
the
state
are
currently
captured
under
our
producer
certificate
program.
F
So
if
you
are
selling
eggs
in
the
state,
if
you
are
a
producer
of
eggs
in
the
state
that
you
are
currently
captured
under
the
producer
certificate
program
and
you
are
receiving
an
inspection
and
pay
the
nominal
producer
certificate
fee
currently,
so
this
bill
does
not
expand
that
the
only
thing
that
we
would
do
under
this
bill
is
when
we
come
out
to
the
farm
to
look
at
the
operation
and
confirm
the
information
on
the
application.
We
would
also
be
looking
at
the
hen
housing
at
the
same
time.
G
Okay,
if
I
could
expand
a
little
bit
down
into
that
on
on
the
amendment
page,
six
we're
still
in
section
the
new
17.
G
G
So
if
they
have
to
have
inspections,
there's
going
to
be
no
fee
passed
on
to
these
egg
producers
in
nevada,
currently
that
if
this
goes
into
effect
as
law
and
then
into
regulation,
the
the
department
of
eggs
just
going
to
absorb
any
of
those
costs
and
not
pass
them
on
to
the
to
the
egg
producers.
Here
in.
F
F
Thank
you.
This
is
jennifer
ott
at
the
department
of
agriculture
for
the
record,
which
is
the
request
that
so
the
extra
in
the
outside
inspection
was
a
result
of
the
conversation
from
the
humane
society
on.
If
the
department
could
not
accomplish
those
inspections,
which
is
why
we
have
requested
to
have
any
inspectors
approved
by
outside
inspectors,
approved
by
the
department
of
agriculture,
so
that
that
would
not
happen.
There
is
no
additional
fee
in
this
bill,
whether
it's
the
department
of
agriculture
or
outside
inspectors,.
B
D
D
D
D
A
I
am
a
yes
members
that
motion
carries.
I
will
take
the
floor
statement
on
that
bill.
That
brings
us
to
the
last
item
on
our
agenda
and
thank
you
all
for
your
questions
and
work
in
getting
us
through
that.
The
last
item
on
our
agenda
is
public
comment.
So
with
that
we'll
go
to
broadcast
production
services
to
see
if
we
have
any
callers
wishing
to
provide
public
comment
at
this
time.