►
From YouTube: 4/21/2021 - Assembly Committee on Ways and Means
Description
For agenda and additional meeting information: https://www.leg.state.nv.us/App/Calendar/A/
Videos of archived meetings are made available as a courtesy of the Nevada Legislature.
The videos are part of an ongoing effort to keep the public informed of and involved in the legislative process.
All videos are intended for personal use and are not intended for use in commercial ventures or political campaigns.
Closed Captioning is Auto-Generated and is not an official representation of what is being spoken.
A
A
Ready
good
evening,
everyone
welcome
to
ways
and
means
at
dusk.
So
if
our
staff
is
ready,
I
will
go
ahead
and
call
the
ways
and
means
meeting
to
order
staff.
If
you
could,
please
call
the
role:
assemblywoman
benitez
thompson
here:
assemblyman
fryerson,
assemblywoman,
gorlow,
here,
assemblyman
haven,
assemblywoman,
howdy,
here,
assemblyman
levitt,
assemblywoman,
miller,
assemblywoman,
monroe,
moreno
here,
assemblywoman,
peters,
assemblyman,
roberts,
assemblywoman,
titus,
assemblywoman,
tolls,
assemblyman,
watts,
chair
carlton,
and
I
am
here
buried
in
files.
So
with
that
committee.
B
We
have
10
bills
on
the
agenda
for
this
evening,
since
this
is
one
of
the
first
times
we're
doing
this
in
person,
and
this
is
how
we're
going
to
start
rolling
through
these.
I
figured
I'd
just
kind
of
give
everybody
a
little
bit
of
a
lay
of
the
land.
C
D
D
Got
our
work
cut
out
for
us
in
in
the
next
couple
of
weeks,
or
so
I
try
to
group
bills
together.
So
if
I
have
someone
here,
they
can
address
two
or
three
bills
at
one
time,
so
some
of
these
bills
this
evening,
will
be
taken
out
of
order
and
for
those
legislators
or
folks
who
wish
to
watch
from
either
the
hallways
the
lobbyist
room,
wherever
we
will
give
you
time.
D
So
we
would
prefer
you
wait
someplace
else
and
we
will
call
you
have
you
come
in
and
go
from
there
and
you
always
have
the
opportunity
to
testify
by
zoom,
if
you
so
wish.
We
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
know
who's
going
to
be
in
person
and
who's
going
to
be
on
zoom,
okay.
So
with
that
committee
members,
if
there
aren't
any
questions,
I
think
we
can
go
ahead
and
begin
this
evening.
C
E
C
Thank
you
good
evening,
chair
carlton,
vice
chair,
monroe,
moreno
and
members
of
the
assembly,
ways
and
means
committee.
My
name
is
steve.
Yeager
I
represent
assembly
district
9
in
southwest
las
vegas.
It
is
a
pleasure
to
present
assembly
bill
202
in
its
first
reprint
to
you.
I
was
going
to
come
and
do
a
deep
dive,
but
I
think
maybe
tonight
just
a
shallow
swim
would
be
appropriate
for
assembly
build
202.
F
C
F
F
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
for
the
record.
Sarah
kaufmann,
legislative
council
bureau
fiscal
division.
The
gaming
control
board
has
identified
a
loss
of
eight
thousand
dollars
per
year
in
revenue
as
a
result
of
the
reductions
in
the
in-person
application
fees
of
twenty-five
dollars
to
an
annual
fee
of
ten
dollars.
This
revenue
is
distributed
to
and
therefore
would
be
a
reduction
in
general
fund.
Okay,
thank
you,
and
do
we
have
anyone
from
the
gaming
control
board
on
zoom.
F
F
I
don't
believe
I
see
anyone
listed
for
that
okay
committee
members,
so
miss
kaufman
has
gone
over
it.
It
seems
like
a
fairly
minimal
impact.
I
know
this
was
this
particular
bill
and
the
issue
was
a
big
topic
of
discussion
over
the
interim
chairman
yeager,
and
I
had
a
number
of
conversations
about
it
to
the
point
where
I
actually
attended
a
gaming.
C
Control
board
meeting,
which
I
never
thought
that
would
happen
in
my
career
and
found
it
very
interesting.
But
to
have
the
conversation
about
the
nonprofits
and
how
this
would.
F
F
Steve
jaeger
for
the
record.
Unfortunately
I
don't
have
that
in
front
of
me.
I
think
it's
in
the
regulations
that
the
gaming
control
board
has
promulgated.
Typically
those
fees.
C
This
way,
it's
at
least
25,
because
that's
what
it
is
an
existing
regulation
and,
of
course,
this
statute
will
lay
on
top
of
that
regulation
for
organizations
under
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
and
then,
if
I'm
not
mistaken
in
one
of
the
bills
we
passed
in
the
2019
session,
I
think
it's
a
higher
fee
for
professional
sports
organizations,
and
that
was
really
the
genesis
of
the
bill
from
2019,
so
at
least
25
dollars
and
perhaps
more,
and
that
would
be
for
every
instance
of
charitable
gaming.
C
C
F
On
the
fact
that
now
they
would
only
be
getting
15
dollars
instead
of
25.
Instead
of
that
they
would
lose
fifteen
dollars
for
every
event
and
they
did
the
math
on
how
many
paid,
and
it
came
to
eight
thousand
dollars
correct.
Yes,
madam
chair
to
you,
through
to
senator
assemblyman
titus.
Yes,
that
is
correct.
That
reduction
would
would
create
a
loss
in
revenues
all
right.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
the
questions.
F
C
Kind
of
a
uh-oh
everybody's
got
to
pay
it,
and
I
I
appreciate
the
consideration
of
taking.
C
B
B
C
C
C
C
Support
of
av-202
and
just
as
a
consideration
here
I'll,
be
brief
before
the
last
law
was
passed.
D
In
the
last
session,
many
of
our
chapters
and
posts
throughout
the
state
from
the
various
veterans
organizations
would
have
50
50
or
small
penny
raffles
to
help
fund
their
operations
in
branch.
Sometimes
they
didn't
make
25
in
those
meetings.
So
two
years
ago
the
majority
of
all
of
our
veterans
posts
and.
D
B
G
H
G
Process
the
identities
of
the
people
involved
as
a
legislature,
we
request
that
information
on
how
stops
are
recorded,
how
the
records
are
maintained
and
what
information
is
collected
according
to
testimony
before
the
committee
of
the
whole.
These
reports
were
intended
to
lay
the
groundwork
for
a
more
in-depth
data,
collection
and
analysis.
G
At
that
time,
I
testified
that
the
legislature
intended
to
work
with
others
to
make
sure
that
we
were
collecting
the
right
information
on
traffic
stops
and
other
stops
and
that
we
were
able
to
analyze
it
in
a
meaningful
way.
The
lcb
did
receive
those
reports
they
are
available
and
on
file
with
the
research
library,
las
vegas
metropolitan
police
department
submitted
a
four-page
report
and
then
the
other.
G
G
The
last
thing
I'll
note
is,
I
don't
think
we
have
anybody
in
mind
if
this
bill
were
to
pass.
I've
been
asked
that
question,
and
this
would
where
the
bill
to
pass,
it
would
go
through
the
rfp
process
where
that
would
be
prepared
and
it
would
go
out
to
potential
consultants
to
give
us
background
and
scope
of
work
and
potential
costs
to
be
able
to
to
do
this,
and
just
by
way
of
reference,
it
is
pretty
rare
for
the
lcb
to
do
this,
but
it
is
not
without
precedent.
G
Just
last
interim
the
lcb
hired
a
consultant
to
work
on
child
welfare
funding
issues.
In
that
case,
there
was
an
appropriation
attached
to
the
bill
of
two
hundred
thousand
dollars
to
cover
the
cost.
Of
course,
this
bill
does
not
have
an
appropriation,
but
that
may
be
a
good
starting
point
for
potential
costs
associated
with
assembly
bill
392.,
and
with
that
madam
chair,
thank
you
for
your
time
and
would
be
happy
to
answer
any.
G
C
C
So
committee
members,
are
there
any
questions
of
chairman
yeager
this
time,
assemblyman
roberts?
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
just
real
briefly,
and
so
that
I
understand
the
scope
of
the
work.
Is
it
would
it
be
an
ongoing
contract
to
examine
up
you
know
ongoing
reports,
or
is
it
just
the
data
that
was
provided
during
this
last
interim.
I
Thank
you,
steve
yeager,
for
the
record
through
you,
madam
chair,
to
assemblyman
roberts.
I
would
envision
it
being
a
one-time
contract
where
essentially
they're
going
to
take
the
data.
That's
provided
now,
which
tells
us
what
data
is
currently
collected.
How
it's
collected
the
software?
That's
used,
they're,
going
to
be
able
to
analyze
that
and
then
come
back
to
us
as
a
policy
making
body
to
decide.
I
Are
we
collecting
the
right
information?
Should
we
mandate
collection
of
different
information?
Should
we
make
recommendations
or
perhaps
require
agencies
to
use
particular
software?
So
it
would
be
that
one
time
scope
and
I
think
that
would
help
manage
the
cost
as
well.
If
we
had
a
contract
with
a
very
specific
scope
of
work
and
a
price
attached
to
it,
then
I
think
the
parties
would
come
in
knowing
what
was
going
on.
I
G
G
G
J
I
G
Chairman
yeager
had
mentioned
in
other
cases,
an
appropriation
was
actually
attached
to
the
bill.
If,
if
you
could
elaborate
on
that,
so
the
committee
is
aware
of
how
that
would
work.
G
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
for
the
record.
Sarah
kaufman
lcb
fiscal,
yes
in
in
other
instances,
similar
bills
have
had
a
maximum
amount.
So,
for
example,
a
maximum
of
up
to
200
000
dollars
be
provided
for
either
a
study
or
some
type
of
consultant
or
expert
expert
to
come
in,
and
so
what
would
end
up
happening
is
the
rfp
would
be
issued
and
the
rfp
could
not
exceed
that
specific
amount.
However,
the
appropriation.
K
K
G
Enforcement
program,
chief
with
the
chief
with
the
division
of
welfare
and
support,
if
I
could
ask
you
to
just
just
a
moment,
we're
having
a
very
difficult
time
hearing
you
if
there's
a
way
to
get
closer
to
the
microphone
or
speak
up
a
little
bit,
so
that
we
have
a
clear
recording.
G
Thank
you
very
to
start
from
the
yes,
please,
okay,
good
evening,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
assembly
committee
of
ways
and
means
kathy
kaplan,
child
support
enforcement
program,
chief
chief
with
the
division
of
welfare
and
supportive
services
and
with
me,
is
candace
mcdaniel.
The
deputy
administrator
for
field
operations
at
dwss,
I'm
here
to
present
assembly
bill
37
for
your
consideration.
G
C
C
D
With
the
removal
of
retroactive,
merit
increases
and
payments
for
working
during
the
holiday
under
the
definitions
of
lump
sum,
we
believe
the
bill
amendment
would
address
the
fiscal
concerns
of
the
division
of
human
resource
management
without
impacting
the
effectiveness
of
the
bill.
I
am
happy
to
answer
any
questions
the
committee
may
have,
if
you
could
so,
you
are
proposing
a
conceptual
amendment
here
in
ways
and
means
was
this
amendment.
D
Okay,
if
you
could
repeat
it,
please,
our
plan
is
right:
ideas,
10
and
11
from
section
5.
and
I
apologize
you
broke
up
and
I
could
only
get
about
every
other
word.
I'm
so
sorry.
D
C
Upon
how
that
would
change
the
collection
of
child
support,
I'm
always
very
cautious.
This
bill
came
out
of
a
policy
committee
with
this
associated
with
it,
and
the
policy
committee
made
a
decision
to
send
it
here.
We're
now
amending
it
to
take
the
fiscal
note
out,
but
we're
also
making
a
change
to
what
came
out.
So
if
you
could
expand
on
what
the
deletion
of
item
10
and
11
under
section
5
actually.
J
Would
do
as
far
as
being
able
to
have
those
dollar
amounts
be
counted
towards
the
income
is.
Is
that
correct
correct?
So
when
we
started
sorry
kaplan
for
the
record,
when
we
started
our
conversations
with
human
resources,
we
realized
that
section,
10
and
11
are
actually
captured
when
we
look
at
the
income
of
the
payor,
and
so
it's
would
still
be
effective
for
us
to
remove
those
items,
because
we
look
at
that
as
part
of
what
their
earning
potential
is.
J
That's
great
on
that
side
of
the
equation
very
good.
How
would
it
eliminate
the
fiscal
note,
so
the
department
of
human
resource
management
is
on
the
line
to
speak
to
their
fiscal
note.
If
that
is
okay
with
you,
okay,
that's
great!
So
if
we
could
have
have
them
queued
up,
please
are
they
on
zoom.
J
Yes,
madam
chair
matthew,
tuma
with
the
department
of
administration
for
the
record,
so
basically
removing
those
items.
J
J
J
J
We
got
so
into
the
amendment.
I
apologize
ms
kaufman.
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
The
the
information
that
I
have
is
very
similar
to
mr
tumas.
The
unsolicited
fiscal
note
from
the
department
of
administration
was
submitted,
which
identifies
expenditures
of
fifty
four
thousand
eight
hundred
twenty
two
dollars
in
fiscal
year.
Twenty
twenty
two
and
sixty
four
thousand
eight
hundred
thirty
five
dollars
in
fiscal
year.
J
Twenty
twenty
three,
the
lump
sum
payments
would
be
manually
processed
by
the
payroll
manager
who
would
be
performing
these
and,
as
such,
the
agency
had
indicated
that
there's
approximately
400
records
that
would
need.
C
L
L
Matthew
tuma
for
the
record,
with
department
of
administration
just
to
confirm.
I
based
off
of
the
conceptual
amendment
proposed
by
dwss.
The
department
of
administration
is
prepared.
C
To
remove
that
conceptual
amendment,
because
the
staff
time
would
not
be
necessary
if
there's
not
the
bi-weekly
review,
so
if
that
conceptual
amendment
is
accepted,
we're
prepared
to
remove
our
fiscal
number.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much,
mr
timo,
for
putting
that
on
the
record.
We
appreciate
it
so
with
that.
I
believe
that
addresses
all
components
of
the
bill.
I'll
go
ahead
and
close
the
hearing
on
assembly
bill
37,
and
we
will
work
towards
getting
discussing
that
amendment
in
the
future.
L
Good
evening,
chair
carlton
members
of
the
committee,
I'm
greg
lovato
administrator
of
the
nevada
division
of
environmental
protection.
I'm
here
today
to
present
ab40,
not
quite
in
its
first
reprint,
but
with
the
amendment
and
our
conceptual
amendment,
which
should
be
available
on
nellis.
It
proposes
changes
to
the
statutes
governing
the
fund
for
cleaning
up
discharges
of
petroleum,
also
known
as
the
petroleum
fund.
C
Following
three
things:
it
one
it
changes
the
definition
of
small
business
for
purposes
of
fund
administration
in
response
to
an
executive
branch
audit.
Second,
it
makes
some
non-fiscal
changes
to
statutory
language,
to
better
align
with
federal
definitions
and
three.
It
accommodates
requests
for
additional
funding
to
address
investigation
and
cleanup
of
releases
under
certain
conditions
and
with
certain
safeguards
so
just
to
bring
you
up
to
speed.
M
M
So
with
respect
to
the
first
amendment,
ab40
and
its
first
print
corrects
an
existing
mathematical
error
in
nrs445c
380
subsection,
two
specifically
section
five
subsection
two
clarifies
the
total
amount
paid
from
the
fund
pursuant
to
the
subsection
in
one
fiscal
year
for
discharges
from
two
or
more
tanks
under
the
control
of
one
operator
qualifying
as
a
small
business
must
not
exceed
1.9
million
for
cleanup
and
1.9
million
for
any
associated
third-party
liability.
The
correct
amount
in
both
cases
should
be
1.95
million.
M
That's
two
million
in
coverage
minus
the
two
thousand
dollar
co-payment.
So
that's
a
simple
amendment.
So,
additionally,
during
testimony
on
this
bill
and
assembly,
natural
resources
representative
representatives
for
the
petroleum
marketers
requested
an
amendment
to
allow
for
additional
funds
beyond
the
1
million
needed
for
cleanup
at
certain
sites.
M
C
L
Of
funding
available
for
transfer
to
the
state
highway
fund
or
the
pending
request
for
up
to
500
000
toward
the
ndep
greenhouse
gas
inventory
included
in
ab452,
the
reason
being
there
are
very
few
leaking
underground
storage
tanks
that
need
to
access
above
1
million
dollars
per
release.
Specifically,
there
have
been
34
sites
of
3
4
34
sites
over
the
life
of
the
fund,
with
14
of
those
closed
and
20
still
open.
N
Open
and
now
those
113
20
still
open
that
have
needed
additional
funds,
so
the
vast
majority
of
the
cases
have
been
closed
and
the
total
number
has
been
in
decline
over
the
years.
However,
for
some
individual
cases,
additional
funds
may
be
needed.
Hence
the
request
for
the
amendment
from
the
joint
marketers
additional
minor
language
edits
are
included
in
section
6,
subsection,
5a
and
section
6,
subsection,
5b3
and
5d7
so
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
present
ab40
for
the
committee's
consideration
and
ready
to
take
any
questions
you
may
have.
L
Thank
you
very
much.
Miss
kaufman
did
you
have
anything
else,
you'd
like
to
add
to
that.
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
This
was
recommended
to
be
pulled
into
ways
and
means
because
the
change
of
total
paid
from
the
funds
for
cleanup
discharge
petroleum
to
any
one
fiscal
year
for
charges
for
two
or
more
storage
tanks
under
control
of
any
one
operator,
from
1.9
million
dollars
to
1.95
million
for
both
cleanup
and
discharge
or
excuse
me
cleanup
and
damages.
C
Thank
you
so
committee
members.
Are
there
any
questions
on
the
proposed
amendment
and
we
are
lucky
to
have
the
chair
of
natural
resources
sitting
right
down
there
in
the
front
row,
so
if
he
needs
to
open
it
up,
I'd
be
more
than
happy
to
go
to
him
first
and
then
we'll
go
to
other
questions,
mr
watts.
Anything.
C
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
thank
you
administrator
lovato
for
providing
some.
L
Over
the
life
of
the
program
that
would
be
eligible
for
additional
funding
under
the
the
reprint
of
the
bill,
could
you
do
you
have
any
estimate?
Can
you
just
give
us
a
little
bit
more
background
even
on
the
life
of
the
program
and
how
any
any
thoughts
on
what
the
increased
draw
down
of
the
fund
would
be
as
a
result
of
of
allowing
a
higher
maximum
for
some
of
these
larger
and
more
complicated
projects.
L
Thank
you,
summerwind
greg
lovato
for
the
record,
so,
as
I
mentioned
before,
you
know,
there's
34
cases
that
have
needed
to
access
beyond
the
original
cap
of
1
million
they've
actually
accessed
into
what's
called
the
second
million
that
is
available
to
address
and
third-party
liability
damages,
and
so
I
actually
don't
think
this
will
result
in
any
additional
expenditures.
It
will
just
allow.
Q
C
I
But
just
a
million
in
investigation
and
cleanup,
so
I
don't
think
there's
going
to
be
any
increased.
You
know
liability
or
expenditures
from
the
fund
going
into
the
future.
L
As
a
result
of
this,
but
you
know
individual
cases
you
know-
will
access
this
second
million
from
this
additional
million,
as
opposed
to
the
million
that's
available
now
from
third
party
liability
damages.
L
Thank
you.
I
think
that's
helpful
clarification.
Thank
you.
Madam
chair
you're.
Welcome
mr
watts,
assemblywoman
miller.
L
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
My
question
is
a
more
overall
general
question
in
regards
to,
and
I'm
reading
off
the
fiscal
note
and
based
on
what
you
said
about
the
change,
in
definition
for
small
business.
So
I
just
want
clarity
and
I'm
not
sure
who
can
who
can
respond
to
this?
Did
we
just
change
the
definition.
D
And
it
won't
apply
to
other
parts
of
nrs
and
we
know
that
the
businesses
that
operate
gas
stations
are
are
pretty
unique
compared
to
other
small
businesses
and
we're
asking
an
av.
40
policy
issue
is
to
define
small
businesses
more
specifically
through
regulation,
and
so
we
have
some
ideas
on
how
to
do
that
and
some
suggestions.
D
N
N
Thank
you,
assemblyman
benita
thompson.
This
is
greg
lovato
for
the
record,
so
yes,
that
change
was
basically
to
make
sure
that
you
know
gas
stations
and
and
owners
of
the
property
as
well
as
the
you
know.
Business
itself
do
change
over
time
and
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
others
could
access
the
funds
that
were
available
as
opposed
to
just
the
original
operator
of
the
storage
tanks.
At
the
time
you
know
they
may
have
been
operated
or
the
release
occurred.
So
you
know
that's
just
clarifying
that.
N
You
know
as
long
as
the
tanks
are
registered
and
they
qualify
for
enrollment
that
they
would
be
eligible
to
receive
reimbursement
for
cleanup.
Even
you
know
in
in
in
terms
of
you
know,
future
operators
or
or
or
future.
D
I'll
just
make
a
quick
announcement
here,
assemblywoman
cohen,
if
you're
in
your
office.
After
we
finish
this
bill,
you
will
be
up
next.
D
R
R
R
R
R
C
121,
please
thank
you.
Share
leslie
cohen
assembly
district
29.
D
D
And
private
vote
for
people
with
disabilities
and
the
bill
extends
upon
those
rights
and
codifies
a
meth
method
for
a
person
with
a
disability
to
participate
in
this
civic
process.
Primarily,
the
measure
allows
a
person
with
a
disability
to
use
the
effective
absentee
system
for
elections
or
ease,
as
it's
known
to.
J
Military
and
overseas
nevadans
to
register
request
a
ballot
and
vote
entirely
online
using
a
digital
electronic
signature.
So
for
a
bill
summary,
it's
really
simple,
it's
what
ab121
is
doing
is
it's
requiring.
C
Keep
in
mind
the
secretary
of
state's
office
already
has
this
program
to
allow
disabled
nevadans
to
vote.
What
the
bill
is
doing
is
essentially
putting
this
program
that
works
well
into
statute,
so
that
we
know
we're
protecting
the
rights
of
nevadans
with
disabilities.
Q
To
amend
yuakawa,
which
is
the
uniform
and
overseas
citizens,
absentee
voting
act
and
then
just
to
align
the
same
day.
Voter
registration
deadline
provided
to
other
nevadans
in
yuakawa,
and
then
provisions
related
to
the
deadline
for
receipt
of
a
ballot
to
conform
to
allow
those
ballots
to
be
received
before
close
of
business
on
the
day
of
the
election,
so
we're
just
kind
of
since
we
were
working
on
this
for
disabled
voters.
We
realized
that
yuakawa
and
our
statutes
that
we
have
right
now,
just
really
aren't
in
aligning.
Q
E
E
So
with
that,
I
believe
the
question
of
the
hour,
probably
for
the
secretary
of
state,
is:
why
do
we
believe
a
marketing
campaign
will
be
needed
if
assembly
bill
121
is
approved.
C
Thank
you,
chair
mark
velasco,
deputy
secretary
of
state
for
elections
for
the
record.
P
The
fiscal
note
that
we
submitted
75
000
for
each
of
the
two
fiscal
years
really
is
intended
to
reach
out
to
two
different
groups
of
people,
one,
the
community
of
voters
who
would
be
affected
by
the
passage
of
ab121,
specifically
those
nevadans
who
are
disabled,
who
are
also
voters,
but
then
also
to
provide
reassurance
to
the
rest
of
the
electorate
about
what
has
changed.
Because
of
ab121.
C
To
the
electorate
and
as
a
result,
these
laws
have
created
confusion
which
led
to
misinformation
and
the
level
of
mistrust
that
the
intent
of
this
fiscal
note
would
be
to
address
to
make
sure
that
everyone
was
aware
of
the
impact
and
the
security
of
the
program
that
some
women
cohen
talked
about.
Thank
you
and
I
appreciate
that,
but
I
do
know
that
within
your
budget,
we
already
address
marketing
and.
K
Public
information
and
outreach,
so
my
question
again
to
you
is:
why
do
you
feel
you
need
another
seventy
five
thousand
dollars
in
each
year
to
address
this
for
the
disabled,
community
and
other
folks,
when
I
know
they're
very
organized
once
this
gets
out
there
they're
going
to
educate
themselves.
So
I'm
just
struggling
to
understand
why
you
feel
you
need
marketing
dollars
for
this
particular
bill.
K
Thank
you
jared
for
the
question
mark
lawson,
deputy
secretary
of
state
for
elections
to
the
record.
Again
it
just
goes
back
to
merely
ensuring
that
the
word
gets
out
again,
not
only.
P
To
those
individuals
who
are
affected
because
you're
absolutely
right
and
talking
with
assemblywoman
cohen
and
other
members
of
the
advocacy
groups
that
we've
worked
with
to
develop
these
in
the
first
place,
there's
certainly
a
lot
of
interest
in
eagerness
if
assembly
bill
121
is
passed
to
get
that
information
out
there,
but
again
concurrently.
There
are
a
lot
of
folks
that
we
need
to
reach
out
to
to
make
sure
that
we
were
able
to
suppress
any
concerns
about
election
security
changing
because
of
this
bill.
P
Well,
I
guess
I'm
just
going
to
lose
you
on
that
that
point,
because
that
seems
to
be
part
of
the
job
anyway,
so
not
sure
exactly
how
to
address
that.
I
can
understand
public
education,
but
I'm
having
a
hard
time
understanding
playing
defense
on
on
public
education
and
outreach.
So
I
guess
we'll
just
have
to
continue
that
that
conversation
and
I'll
get
some
more
information
from
you
on
that.
So
with
that
committee
members
I'd
like
to
open
it
up,
I'll,
have
speaker,
fryerson
and
then
I'll
go
to
assemblywoman
tools
afterwards,.
M
Concern-
and
that
is
when
we
come
here-
we
come
here
to
assess
the
cost
of
implementing
proposed
legislation.
M
This
doesn't
sound
like
this
is
required
to
in,
in
order
for
us
to
pass
and
even
implement
this
policy.
This
just
I
mean
I,
I
guess
probably
80-
of
the
bills
that
we
pass
here
could
benefit
from
a
public
education
campaign,
but
that
doesn't
mean
that
it's
required
in
order
for
us
to
actually
pass
a
bill.
M
So
this
seems
to
me
to
be
a
secretary
of
state
office
bill
request,
quite
frankly
and
coming
from
a
good
place,
but
it
it.
There
are
a
lot
of
areas
where
we
could
benefit
from
better
public
education,
but
it
doesn't
mean
we.
We
don't
pass
the
policy
that
can
be
implemented
and,
as
you
indicated,
community
organizations
and
other
people
that
are
familiar
with
it
can
also
use
their
own
networks
in
order
to
to
educate
the
folks
that
are
the
most
impacted
by
this.
M
So
I
just,
I
certainly
understand
the
interest
in
wanting
to
put
forth
an
effort
to
educate
a
community
that
that
could
benefit
from
it,
but
it
just
doesn't
sound
to
me
like
this.
Is
a
fiscal
note
on
a
bill
as
opposed
to
a
standalone
policy
request
to
be
able
to
better,
implement
it
or
better
educate
the
public
about
it?
P
I
don't
think
there's
a
need
for
a
response
on
that
one
assemblywoman
tolls.
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
I
I
was
wondering
in
a
similar
fashion.
If
the
fiscal
note
was
rather
going
to
be
to
expand
software
or
or
expand,
you
know
the
technological
aspect
of
in
the
implementation.
So
I
take
it
that
there's
there's
no
fiscal
note
for
that
piece
of
it.
P
Thank
you
so
much
for
the
question
mark
lost
in
deputy
secretary
of
state
for
elections
record.
That
is
correct.
There
is
no
fiscal
note
related
to
the
modification
of
the
program
itself.
Already
the
program
is
ada
compliant.
P
We
would
work
with
the
advocates
to
make
sure
that
if,
as
new
ada
requirements
developed
over
time
or
again
upon
passing
of
the
bill,
if
there
were
any
that
needed
to
be
modified,
we
would
be
able
to
do
so,
but
we
accepted
that
as
part
of
the
the
routine
course
of
our
sustainment
for
the
various
programs
that
we've
established,
including
ease.
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
may
I
ask
yes,
please
go
ahead,
follow
up.
Thank
you
so
so
I
understand
you
just
say
that
that
could
be
absorbed
by
the
department.
C
Already
so
then,
my
next
question
would
be
back
to
this
fiscal
note
in
regards
to
expansion
of
an
outreach
and
education
program.
If,
if
and
it's
not
sounding
like
it's
going
this
direction,
but
if
it
were
to
be
approved,
are
you
thinking
that
it's
going
to
go
past
the
2223
cycle
that
this
would
be
something.
D
D
Thank
you
for
the
question.
No
ma'am.
That
is
not
the
intent
to
have
that
in
perpetuity.
The
intent
would
really
to
be
to
again
address
to
an
extent
the
individuals
that
would
be
affected
and
then
really
again.
C
To
make
sure
that
the
rest
of
the
electorate
that
perhaps
weren't
affected
by
this,
that
they
they
were
not
concerned
about.
D
Thank
you,
and
just
to
clarify
earlier,
if
I
may,
I
believe
assemblywoman
cohen,
had
alluded
to
that
this
program.
C
Like
thank
you
assemblywoman
for
the
question
mark
velasco,
deputy
secretary
of
state
for
elections
for
the
record.
The
intent
of
the
outreach
program
again
would
really
be
twofold.
First,
we
would
work
closely
with
the
advocates
that
could
look
again
depending
on
the
community
that
we'd
be
talking
about
and
trying
to
get
our
information
to.
Would.
Q
Be
of
course,
tailor-made
to
reach
those
individuals
in
regards
to
the
greater
outreach
program
for
the
rest
of
the
the
electorate
to
make
sure
that
they
understand
that
now
that
there
is
a
change
to
elections,
law
that
this
is
not
something
that's
going
to
create
an
increased
risk.
That
is
not
something
that
that
may
necessarily
apply
to
them
again.
There's
a
wide
range
of
efforts
that
we've
been
discussing
to
do
so.
Q
The
key
would
be
to
identify
those
population
centers
that
in
groups
of
people
that
are
worried
about
it
and
make
sure
that
we
provide
tailored
information
to
them
specifically
to
that
community.
In
some
cases
that
may
include
translating
information
into
other
languages
that
may
include
mailers
to
certain
locations.
Q
E
Thank
you
assemblyman
for
the
question
mark
lawson,
deputy
secretary
of
state
for
elections
for
the
record.
We
based
it
previously
on
ad
campaigns
that
we've
had
of
a
similar
type
scope.
In
previous
years.
We
went
specifically
and
looked
at
what
we
did
following
ab4
in
2020
after
the
32nd
special
session
and
made
again
that
advertisement
campaign
was
significantly
larger.
O
O
Thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much
so
with
that.
Are
there
any
other
questions
from
the
committee
at
this
time,
not
seeing
anyone
so
with
that,
I
believe
we
can
go
ahead
and
go
to
the
phone
lines
for
support
of
assemblyville
121
broadcast
services.
If
you
could,
please
open
up
the
lines
for
support.
C
Queue
to
testify
and
support.
Pardon
me
color
with
the
last
three
digits
one:
two
zero,
please
press
star,
six
to
unmute,
please
slowly
state
and
spell
your
name
for
the
record.
You
will
have
two
minutes
and
may
begin
good
evening.
Madam
chair
members
of
the
committee,
stephen
cohen,
for
the
record
stephen
with
a
v
cohen,
as
in
the
assemblywoman,
no
known
relation.
D
Potentially
having
a
family
member
caregiver,
etc
assist
them
with
casting
their
ballot
consistent
with
point
number
two,
on
the
second
to
last
page
of
my
prepared
remarks,
I
used
marriage
as
the
example,
but
I
think
that
the
risk.
D
Q
Q
Q
Good
evening
madam
chair
carlton,
vice
chair
rest
of
the
committee
good
evening,.
C
Awesome
cohen,
my
name
is
dora
martinez.
I
represent
the
nevada
disability
peer
action
coalition.
I'm
happy
that
this
bill
made
it
to
this
point.
A
lot
of
people
didn't
know
about
ease
last
voting
session.
I
think
it
was
only
under
100
or
so
that
were
new
known
about
it,
so
they
they
were
happy
to
do,
but
moving
forward.
C
S
Public
information,
also,
if
you
all,
are
not
aware
the
university
of
nevada
reno
at
the
nevada
centers
for
excellence
in
disability.
S
S
They
have
a
loan
and
library
where
there's
all
kinds
of
assistive
technology
and
a
person
who
is
visually
impaired
here
in
the
north
and
one
in
the
south,
who
is
hard
of
hearing
and
visual,
and
I
think,
he's
visually
impaired
as
well.
They
can
train
it's
like
a
peer-to-peer
training
group,
so
you
know
I
would
advise
the
secretary
of
state
to
reach
out
to
them
and-
and
we
can
help
make
this
possible.
S
S
S
S
S
S
Thank
you
very
much
broadcast
services
for
all
of
your
assistants.
Assemblywoman
cohen,
did
you
have
any
closing
comments?
Thank
you
chair
again,
thank
you
for
hearing
the
bill
and
I
would
just
like
to
thank
the
secretary
of
state's
office
and
mr
falashan
they've
been
very
helpful
throughout
this
process
and
and
just
you
know
very
concerned
with
making
sure
we
had
good
legislation.
So
thank
you
for
that
and
thank
you
very
much,
miss
cohen,
it's
nice
to
thank
the
person
who
put
a
fiscal
note
on
your
bill.
There.
S
S
Thank
you
good
evening,
chair
carlton
and
members
of
the
committee
on
ways
and
means.
My
name
is
rochelle
and
I
represent
assembly
district
10,
and
I
am
I'm
actually
very
excited
to
be
here
for
my
first
time
in
waze-
and
I
am
here
to
present
assembly
bill
147
assembly
bill
147,
creates
enabling
language
for
counties
to
create
an
office
of
county
council
to
avoid
legal
conflicts
of
interest
within
the
district
attorney's
office.
We
can
definitely
stay
out
of
the
weeds
on
this
bill.
S
The
simplest
explanation
of
the
fiscal
note
is
that
the
ag's
office
actually
currently
does
this
work
of
providing
attorney
general
legal
opinions,
and
this
bill
does
nothing
to
change
that
current
procedure.
I
believe
miss
adair
is
there
and
has
provided
your
staff
with
kind
of
a
similar
explanation
and
can
answer
any
questions
that
you
might
have.
S
S
S
If
this
bill
were
to
be
approved
and
according
to
the
attorney
general,
it
uses
an
hourly
billing
rate
from
the
attorney
general
cost
allocation
plan
to
charge
entities
for
services
that
are
not
included
under
the
state's
cost
allocation
plan,
such
as
boards
commissions
and
counties.
Currently,
that
rate
is
154.36
cents
per
hour,
and
if
the
attorney
general
opinion
is
requested,
that
requires
more
than
13
hours
of
legal
work.
It
could
cost.
E
E
That
is
all
that
the
bill
would
do,
and
that
is
the
only
impact
that
it
would
have
on
the
office
is
just
allowing
us
to
then
send
a
bill.
Should
a
county
council
request
an
agl
and
thank
you
very
much,
and
we
do
have
conversations
on
dollars
coming
in
and
dollars
going
out,
because
they
all.
C
Impact
your
budget
and
we
want
to
make
sure
we
have
a
full
picture
so
that
when
we
do
align
your
budget,
we
give
you
the
resources
that
you
need.
So
that's
it's
not
always
just
necessarily
a
fiscal
note.
It's
any
physical
impact
that
might
might
happen
to
you,
so
we
always
want
to
make
sure
we
get
it
on
the
record.
So
thank
you
very
much
for
being
here.
Miss
benitez
thompson.
C
Thank
you
so
much-
and
this
is
just
about
the
time
frame,
because
we
know
that
typically
with
these,
these
the
the
costs
that
the
ag's
office-
typically
you
incur
them
and
then
that
some
time
passes
your
bill
and
then
some
time
passes
and
you
receive
it.
I
know
that
it
might
be
different
from
when
you
build
a
local
government
versus
estate
agencies,
because,
as
we've
discussed
in
other
pieces
of
our
budgets,
we're
seeing
you
know
legal
costs
coming
true
in
this
session
that
were
actually
incurred
like
three
years
ago
or
three,
so
is
that?
C
Is
that
the
same
cycle
where
you
kind
of
carry
that
cost
or
is
it
for
years
or
is
it
shorter
when
you're
billing
other
entities?
Thank
you
for
the
question.
It
could
be.
I,
with
an
attorney
general
opinion
name
for
the
record.
Please,
oh
thank
you.
Thank
you,
chair
jessica.
Dare
for
the
record?
Yes
it!
It
could
be,
though,
with
an
attorney
general
opinion,
we
receive
the
opinion
we're
able
to
turn
that
around
fairly
quickly
and
then
turn
around
a
bill.
D
Litigation
completely
separate
problem:
it
could
go
on
for
years
and
so
you're
exactly
right.
The
the
amount
of
money
coming
in
doesn't
necessarily
match
up
in
timing,
in
terms
of
when
we're
able
to
turn
around
a
bill
for
services,
but
to
so
most
of
our
clients
are
state
agencies
and
they're
funded
on
an
annual
basis
through
the
attorney
general's
cost
allocation
plan.
O
That
we
do
for
many
of
boards
are
are
built
on
an
hourly
basis,
as
ms
kaufman
mentioned.
So
it
is
a
little
bit
different
and
I
think
that
goes
to
to
the
chairs
point
about
how
this
wouldn't
necessarily
have
a
cost
to
our
office.
But
it
would
affect
just
our
ability
to
do
some
of
our
work
and
how
some
of
that
funding
would
come
into
our
office.
O
I
don't
know
that.
I
fully
understand
why
the
assumption
would
be
that
there's
a
possible
more
a
possible
greater
number
of
agos
than
what
the
ag
is
currently
having
to
process,
because
it's
the
same
job,
it's
just
being
done
by
someone
else,
and
so
I
I
did
have
some
conversations,
and
I
appreciate
your
having
gotten
back
to
my
office
as
well
about
the
fact
that
statutorily
the
attorney
general's
office
is
authorized
to
to
do
attorney.
O
D
Thank
you,
speaker,
jessica,
dare
for
the
record
you're
exactly
right,
we
are
not,
and
I
it
was
not
our
intention
in
this
statement
to
to
make
it
to
give
the
impression
that
there
would
this
would
result.
B
D
D
R
D
D
D
B
B
B
Queue
chair
of
the
line
is
open
and
working.
However,
we
have
no
one
to
testify
in
neutral
on
ab147.
Thank
you
very
much.
Ms
nguyen.
Did
you
have
any
closing
comments
rochelle
in
for
the
record?
No,
I
do
not
thank
you
for
your
time.
Thank
you
very
much
and
were
you
here
for
any
other
bills
this
evening,
miss
win.
I
am
I'm
here
for
assembly
bill
393..
B
Thank
you,
chair,
carlton,
again,
rochelle
win
for
the
record
assembly
bill.
393
is
actually
a
cleanup
bill
for
assembly
bill
236
as
you'll
recall,
that
was
an
omnibus
criminal
reinvestment
reform
bill
that
passed
in
2019
that
bill
in
2019
required.
The
sentencing
commission
and
specifically
the
nevada
department.
D
D
Ab-393
created
for
this
nevada
department
of
sentencing
policy,
the
executive
director
of
the
nevada
department
of
sentencing
policy
is
also
on
the
zoom.
I
see
victoria
gonzalez
on
here
and
I'm
sure
she
can
also
answer
any
additional
questions
that
the
committee
might
have.
Regarding
that
fiscal
note,
thank
you
very
much
we'll
go
to
miss
kaufman
and
then
we'll
go
to
ms
gonzalez,
ms
kaufman.
B
Identified
a
fiscal
impact
of
seventy
five
thousand
three
hundred
forty
five
dollars
in
fiscal
year:
twenty
twenty
two
and
ninety
six
thousand
nine
hundred
eighty
seven
dollars
in
fiscal
year,
twenty
twenty
three
to
find
a
management
analyst
position
to
build
and
maintain
databases
that
the
data
can
be
provided
to
the
commission
and
to
support
the
nevada,
local
justice,
reinvestment,
coordinating
council.
C
D
A
one-page
synopsis
that
bullet
points
why
the
fiscal
impact
to
our
department,
as
assemblywoman
wynn,
discussed
what.
C
S
To
help
us
build
those
databases
in
order
to
continue
helping
this
legislature
and
the
state
as
a
whole
continue
to
make
the
data-driven
recommendations
for
corrections
and
sentencing
that
were
able
to
be
developed
for
ab-236
and
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
that
members
of
the
committee
may
have.
Thank
you
very
much
I'll
open
it
up
to
the
committee
for
questions.
Does
anyone
have
questions
of
miss
nguyen
or
miss
gonzalez?
At
this
time
very
concise,
easy
to
understand,
presentation.
C
That's
how
I
boiled
it
down,
not
seeing
any
other
questions
from
any
committee
members
with
that
we'll
go
ahead
and
go
to
the
phone
lines
if
we
could
go
ahead
and
open
up
the
lines
for
those
in
support
of
assembly
bill
393
to
testify
in
support
of
ab393.
C
T
T
T
T
T
T
Thank
you,
rochelle
lynn,
for
the
record.
I
I
I
just
think
I
would
be
remiss
to
not
point
out
that
miss
gonzalez
is
already
doing
the
work
of
probably
five
people
herself.
I
know
that
these
resources.
E
Our
state
budget,
especially
going
into
this
budgetary,
you
know
decisions
that
we're
making,
but
I
know
that
the
work
that
we're
doing
here
and
the
data
that
we're
collecting
we
are
saving
millions
and
millions
of
dollars
with
enactment
of
236,
and
I
think,
having
that
data
and
being
able
to
collect
and
analyze
that
appropriately.
So
we
can
inform
the
legislative
bodies.
C
L
Understands
typically,
what
I
will
do
is
if
a
member
of
the
committee
has
available
for
us,
because
you
are
here
through
the
whole
meeting.
I
typically
take
the
members
last
and
allow
other
members
to
come
forward
first,
so
I
believe
we
would
go
ahead
and
open
up
the
next
bill
that
we
want
to
hear
would
be
assembly
bill
230,
and
I
believe
we
have
assemblyman
miller.
L
L
L
I
appreciate
this
opportunity
to
present
assembly
bill
230,
which
aims
to
eliminate
direct
filing
provisions
in
nevada
statute
that
require
youth
to
be
tried
in
a
dim
adult
criminal
court
when
charged
with
certain
offenses
over
the
past
couple
of
years
couple
of
legislative
sessions.
This
body
has
made
both
steps
to
reform
both
our
juvenile
and
criminal
justice
systems.
Ab230
is
another
big
step
forward
in
giving
some
of
our
most
troubled
youth
a
chance.
M
As
an
adult,
giving
them
an
added
layer
of
due
process,
two,
it
retains
the
process
of
direct
filing
only
in
cases
of
murder,
attempt
murder
and
mass
casualty
events.
This
was
a
necessary
amendment
due
to
the
strain
this
may
have
on
our
current
juvenile
housing
structure,
infrastructure
and
then
three.
It
requires
the
legislative
committee
on
child
welfare
and
juvenile
justice
to
conduct
an
interim
study
on
the
need
for
need
for
and
cost
of,
infrastructure
associated
with
housing
juveniles
awaiting
their
certification
hearings.
M
Now
this
study
is
necessary
because
the
infrastructure
and
resources
required
to
fully
eliminate
direct
files
altogether
are
the
main
factors
that
have
hindered
previous
attempts
to
end.
This
practice
in
our
state
today
is
no
different,
so
we
must
address
the
infrastructure
needs
that
this
bill
requires.
M
L
Today,
we
must
really
consider
how
we
make
the
necessary
investments
to
ensure
all
of
our
children.
All
of
our
youth
have
every
opportunity
to
succeed
at
becoming
responsible
and
contributing
members
to
our
communities
and
not
an
ongoing
financial
burden.
Now
there
are
several
fiscal
notes
submitted
on
the
as
introduced
version
of
the
bill.
Many
of
them
were
zero
or
were
unable
to
be
determined.
L
After
reaching
out
to
and
working
with
each
county
of
each
county,
the
amended
version
of
this
bill
eliminates
most
of
their
fiscal
concerns
and
in
clark
it
will
reduce
their
fiscal
note
by
nearly
45
percent
over
the
biennium.
I
believe
that
you
all
received
an
email
from
me
that
has
a
spreadsheet
with
that
budget.
It's
also
posted.
M
On
nellis,
this
change
is
reflected
in
that
budget
and
now
we're
here
today,
because
obviously
the
policy
was
determined
that
this
is
something
that
we
need
to
do
now.
It's
our
turn
to
determine
how
much
we
can
squeeze
out
to
invest
in
what
could
be
our
last
opportunity
to
save
some
of
our
most
troubled
young
people
from
a
life
of
recidivism
in
and
out
of
our
prison
system.
M
So
as
we
consider
this
I'd
like
to
bring
to
the
forefront
of
your
mind
that
there
has
been
a
diligent
effort
by
this
body
and
local
governments
to
use
diversionary
program
programming
to
keep
our
youth
out
of
this
system
altogether
and
if
they
do
have
a
situation
that
gives
them
a
brush
with
our
justice
system.
There
are
now
things
like
youth
level,
service
assessments
that
are
aimed
at
assessing
young
people,
with
the
goal
of
aiding
a
judge
and
making
a
decision
for
probationary
release.
B
B
There
are
other
strategies
that
are
also
geared
toward
diverting
our
youth
from
being
housed
in
any
corrections
facility,
so
we
should
expect
that
our
infrastructure
needs
should
be
reduced
or,
at
the
very
least,
not
expect
them
to
increase.
Now
that
is
not
to
negate
the
legitimate
needs
of
our
juvenile
system
to
adequately
support.
D
D
D
Thank
you,
mr
miller,
so
with
that
I'll
go
to
ms
kaufman.
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
As
amended,
the
bill
requires
the
legislative
committee
on
child
welfare
and
juvenile
justice
to
conduct
an
interim
study
which
may
result
in
additional
expenditures
in
order
to
complete
the
division
of
child
and
family
services
indicated
that
the
fiscal
impact
cannot
be
determined.
It
is,
as
it
is
unclear
how
many
youths.
D
C
On
our
video
monitor,
so
I
see
no
one
on
zoom.
C
C
C
G
G
G
G
Good
evening,
chair
and
committee,
this
is
jamie
rodriguez
from
washoe
county,
I'm
actually
neutral.
I
was
just
trying
to
raise
my
hand
earlier
when
you
were
asking
for
me.
So,
madam
chair,
I'm
happy
to
defer
to
you
if
you
would
like
me
to
go
ahead
and
speak
now
or
come
back
when
it's
time
for
neutral
testimony,
go
ahead
and
we'll
just
mark
you
down
as
neutral
there's
no
reason
to
go
out
and
come
back
in
so
please
proceed.
G
Okay!
Thank
you,
chairwoman
committee,
jamie
rodriguez,
again
for
the
record
j-a-m-I-e.
C
C
The
original
fiscal
note
was
looking
at
about
a
10-year
average
going
back
to
2010.
We
definitely
did
have
a
number
of
direct
files
before.
G
2016.
several
of
those
were
murder
crimes,
and
so
that's
where
there
was
a
concern
that
we
would
potentially
have
to
open
another
wing
of
our
unit.
E
E
C
Collar
with
the
last
three
digits
one,
eight
two
please
slowly
state
and
spell
your
name
for
the
record.
You
will
have
two
minutes
and
may
begin
good
evening,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
ways
and
means
committee
for
the
record.
My
name
is
ariel
edwards,
a-r-I-e-l-l-e
e-d-w-a-r-d-s,
on
behalf
of
the
city
of
north
las
vegas,
testifying
in
support
of
assembly
bill
230..
C
C
C
H
Chair
the
testimony
line
is
open
and
working.
However,
we
have
no
more
people
to
testify
in
support
of
ab230.
Thank
you
very
much
broadcast
services.
Let's
open
up
the
line
for
those
in
opposition,
please
to
testify
in
opposition
to
assembly
bill
230,
please
press
star
9,
now
to
take
your
place
in
the
queue.
H
Call
her
with
the
last
three
digits
2
four
one:
please
slowly
state
and
spell
your
name
for
the
record.
You
will
have
two
minutes
and
may
begin
good
evening,
fair,
carlton
and
members
of
the
assembly
ways
and
means
committee.
My
name
is
alex
ortiz
a-l-e-x
a-l-e-x-o-r-t-I-z,
representing
clark
county
clark,
kenny
opposes
ab230
as
written
and
amended,
but
only
due.
C
This
cisco
note,
as
you
know,
is
available
on
nellis
now
amendment
143,
which
was
adopted
last
week,
one
removed
sexual
assault,
offenses
and
offenses,
involving
the
use
or
attempted
use
of
the
firearm
from
automatic
certification
to
adult
court
and
two
requires
an
interim
study
about
the
need
for
the
cost
of
the
infrastructure
associated
with
housing
juveniles
awaiting
certification
for
criminal
proceedings.
As
an
adult,
due
to
the
provisions
of
this
amendment,
we
reduced
our
fiscal
impact
on
what
we.
D
Originally
submitted
to
the
lcd
fiscal
which
is
available
on
nellis
to
3.2
million
in
50
or
2022
3.3
million
in
fifth
year,
2023
and
6.5
over
the
biennia,
but
somebody
miller
testified
earlier
that
he
had
posted
this
information.
I
think
sent
you
all
an
email
about
the
spreadsheet
that
we
provided
to
him
and
it's
also
been
posted
on
nellis
as
well
as.
D
Housing
unit,
and
not
two,
as
originally
estimated,
to
hold
the
number
of
juveniles
that
may
be
impacted
by
this
legislation,
as
amended
in
our
juvenile
detention
center.
These
estimates
include
cost
of
staff
additional
housing,
high
security
housing
unit,
as
well
as
provide
food
supplies,
nursing
and
mental
health
services
to
the
juvenile
housing
or
in
immediate.
In
this
unit.
I.
D
C
C
Collar
with
the
last
three
digits
one
zero
four,
please
slowly
state
and
spell
your
name
for
the
record.
You
will
have
two
minutes
and
may
begin
good
evening.
Kara
carlton,
vice
chair,
marina,
monroe
mourinho,
is
similar
miller.
This
is
harold
wickham
from
the
nevada
department
of
corrections.
D
A
w-I-c-k-h-a-m
we
are
testifying
in
the
neutral,
and
I
would
just
like
to
state
for
the
record
that
we
really
appreciate
assuming
miller,
bringing
this
bill
forward,
and
we
think
it
would
result
in
a
significant
cost
savings
for
the
state.
Again,
thanks
for
all
you
do
and
have
a
good
evening.
D
B
C
B
Okay,
thank
you
very
much.
Were
there
any
other
questions
of
assemblyman
miller
before
we
do
a
lot
of
his
closing
statement,
seeing
none
assemblyman
miller
did
you
have
any
closing
assemblyman
miller
for
the
record
I'll,
be
real
brief,
because
I'm
long-winded
just
want
to
note
that
we're
looking
at
about
24
youth
with
the
amendment
over
an
entire
year
and
with
considering
overlaps,
as
maybe
one
to
three
youth
that
would
be
housed
at
the
same
time
throughout
that
period.
B
So
when
we
look
at
that
fiscal
note,
I'd
like
us
to
take
into
consideration,
you
know
what
we're
talking
about
here
and
what
that
impact
looks
like
with
that
being
said,
thank
you
very
much
for
your
time
today.
Thank
you
very
much,
mr
miller.
So
with
that
I
will
close
the
hearing
on
assemblyville
230.
C
Is
assembly
bill
166,
we'll
invite
committee
member
hafen
to
the
testimony
table.
B
B
C
Disclosure
requirements
in
nevada
to
make
sure
that
text
messages
from
a
person
packed
political
party
or
committee,
sponsored
by
a
political
party,
disclosing
the
text
message:
the
name
of
the
individual
or
entity
who
paid
for
the
communications
consistent
with
current
law.
This
is
only
required
when
the
individual
or
entity
spends
more
than
a
hundred
dollars
and
the
communication
advocates
for
the
election
or
defeat
of
a
candidate
or
a
group
of
candidates
or
is
soliciting
contributions.
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
thank
you
assemblyman
haven,
we'll
go
to
ms
kaufman.
C
C
Good
evening,
thank
you,
madam
chair
mark
velasco
deputy
secretary
of
state
for
elections
for
the
record.
Our
fiscal
note
there's
really
two
parts
to
this
fiscal
note,
and
I
do
want
to
be
clear
that
the
the
personnel
that
are
identified
in
this
fiscal
note
are
not
necessarily
a
requirement
for
implementation,
but
really
for
enforcement.
C
Currently,
the
agency
only
has
two
employees
that
are
full-time
focused
on
answering
phones
to
receive
complaints
from
the
electorate
during
the
election
season.
We
have
two
additional
personnel
that
are
able
to
transition
from
their
duties
to
focus
on
that
with
again
a
varying
amount
of
other
individuals
sporadically
throughout
the
day.
C
C
Additionally,
there's
a
part-time
requirement
for
a
compliance
investigator
again,
not
full-time
employee,
but
simply
some
someone
that,
for
a
six
month
period,
starting
with
the
primary
election
and
going
through
the
general
election,
will
be
able
to
address
these
complaints
and
concerns
in
a
timely
manner.
Ultimately,
if
ab-166
is
passed
and
the
agency
does
not
receive
these
funds,
these
concerns
would
still
be
addressed,
albeit
not
nearly
in
as
a
timely
manner,
which
again
could
create
some
issues
and
concerns
with
the
electorate.
Thank
you.
C
C
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
and
again
along
the
same
lines
as
earlier
with
respect
to
what
might
be
ideal
versus,
what's
absolutely
necessary
to
implement.
But
my
question
is
really
for
the
secretary
of
state.
C
I
would
imagine
actually
I
know,
because
I
know
of
people
who
have
called
that
the
secretary
of
state's
office
currently
gets
calls
about
the
appropriateness
of
political
messaging
and
mail
and
text
messaging,
and
so,
if
that's
the
case
rather
than
more,
it
seems
like
there
was
a
chance
that
the
secretary
of
state's
office
would
actually
get
less
calls,
because
the
disclosures
that
this
proposes
to
require
would
answer
some
of
those
questions.
C
Response,
thank
you,
madam
chair,
thank
you
speaker
for
the
question
mark
falasham
for
the
record
speaker
that
that
is
certainly
something
that
we
took
into
consideration
when
we
were
looking
at
expecting
our
analysis
of
this
bill.
The
concern,
of
course,
is,
as
as
over
the
years
as
we've
moved
into
more
and
more
technology
being
used
to
encourage
and
spread
elections
related
material.
C
The
number
of
phone
calls
that
we've
received,
relating
to
text
messages
and
to
other
emails
and
the
like
other
digital
forms
of
communication
has
only
continued
to
go
up
and
we
anticipate
that
that
trend
will
continue
in
it.
You
know,
frankly,
that,
even
with
the
passage
of
this
bill,
while
that
certainly
would
allow
for
certain
communications
to
be
again
more
clear
when
individuals
and
organizations
put
paid
for
by
on
those
text
messages,
there
is,
of
course
an
increased
chance
that
other
agencies
and
individuals
may
not
creating
this
compliance
requirement.
C
If
I
can
briefly
follow
up
manager,
thank
you-
and
I
think
you
kind
of
made
my
point,
but
by
notice
by
by
recognizing
that,
with
the
advent
of
technology,
you
already
are
getting
more
calls,
and
so
I
I
think
it
if
this.
C
If
this
legislation
went
away,
the
secretary
of
state's
office
would
still
get
increasing
calls
as
technology
advances
and
folks
use
technology
in
newer
ways,
and
so
again
it
just
it
feels
to
me
like
this
is
a
legitimate
concern
of
the
secretary
of
state's
office
independent
of
this
bill,
and
so
I
just
think
in
the
future.
If
we
need
to
have
a
conversation
about
the
tools
that
the
secretary
of
state's
office
needs,
we
should
have
that
conversation,
but
not
attach
it
randomly
to
bills
that
involve
costs
that
the
office
is
going
to
incur
either
way.
C
Thank
you,
speaker
I'll,
go
to
assemblyman
roberts.
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
I
think
the
speaker
covered
a
lot
of
what
I
was
going
to
say
and
I
I
believe
that
this
physical
note
is
premature,
that
we
do
really
don't
know
the
impact
that
it's
going
to
have
to
the
speaker's
point.
It
actually
could
reduce
some
of
your
workload
and
it
would
be
certainly
something
that
the
the
secretary
of
state's
office
could
come
back
in
the
next
budget
cycle
and
you
know,
and
and
present
something
to
justify
an
increase
in
in
staffing.
C
C
C
C
C
Chair
the
testimony
line
is
open
and
working.
However,
we
have
no
one
to
testify
in
neutral
on
assembly
bill
166..
Thank
you
very
much
broadcast
services.
Assemblyman
hafen
did
you
have
any
closing
comments.
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I
just
simply
want
to
say
thank
you
and
I
will
steal
the
speaker's
comments
as
my
closing
remarks.
So
thank
you.
Okay,
assemblyman
haven
goes
ditto
the
speaker
with
that.
C
We'll
put
that
in
the
record:
okay:
somebody's
going
to
get
a
gold
star
for
that
this
evening
we
will
go
ahead
and
close
the
hearing
on
assembly
oil
166
and
our
final
bill.
This
evening
committee
is
assembly
bill
188.
We
will
invite
miss
monroe,
moreno
or
actually
we
have
dmv
available
so
we'll
invite
dmv
forward
to
give
us
a
brief
overview
of
the
bill.
We'll
ask
a
few
questions:
we'll
have
miss
kaufman,
brief
us
and
then
we'll
go
from
there.
So
welcome
to
the
committee,
mr
seaver.
C
Thank
you,
chair
and
good
evening
committee
members,
sean
sever
from
the
dmv,
and
thank
you
for
hearing
ab188
this
bill
would
dissolve
the
commission
on
special
license
plates
all
duties
currently
signed.
The
commission
would
be
reassigned
to
the
dmv
which
we
are
okay
with,
because
many
of
the
commission's
duties
are
duplicative
of
what
we're
doing
at
the
dmv.
C
So
the
dmv
will
incorporate
all
of
the
duties
and
functions
of
the
commission
into
its
ongoing
operations
and
in
fact
we
have
submitted
a
no
impact
disconnect
on
this
bill.
So
thank
you
for
con.
Your
consideration
of
ab188
and
I
do
have
dmv
administrator
april
sanborn
here
to
help
with
questions
thanks
and
thank
you
very
much,
mr
server.
So
it's
my
understanding,
then,
that
the
process
of
applying
for
a
special
plate
will
still
stay.
In
effect,
it
simply
will
not
go
to
a
special
commission
it
will.
C
The
dmv
will
provide
that
so
there'll
still
be
a
cue.
People
will
still
have
to
come
forward,
make
their
case
for
the
plate
and
we'll
still
have
the
same
number
of
plates,
and
if
a
plate
is
vacated,
then
another
plate
will
be
able
to
be
issued
in
that
plate's
position.
Is
that
correct,
chair,
sean
sever
from
the
dmv
that
is
correct?
The
program
will
still
look
the
same.
We
will
just
be
administering
it
instead
of
the
commission.
C
Okay,
thank
you
very
much
with
that
I'll
go
to
miss
kaufman
and
then
I
do
have
a
couple
of
questions
we'll
go
from
there.
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
The
dmv
and
the
legislative
council
bureau
did
submit
zero
fiscal
impact
on
the
measure
as
introduced.
However,
with
the
amended
language,
there
may
be
an
impact
given
the
requirement
for
the
legislative
auditor
to
compile
and
submit
a
report,
and
so
that
was
a
fiscal
staff's
concern
that
it
may
cause
expenditures
for
the
lcb
and
thank
you
very
much,
miss
kaufman.
C
My
concern
is
that
I
I
watch
through
the
session
the
cumulative
effect
of
the
impact
to
our
audit
division
and
they
do
excellent
work
and
when
we
ask
them
to
step
up,
they
never
say
no,
but
they
also
never
ask
for
any
of
the
additional
resources
that
they
really
need.
So
I
greatly
appreciate
them
being
able
to
take
on
these
responsibilities.
C
It's
very
important
to
make
sure
that
the
nonprofits
who
receive
the
dollars
from
these
plates
are
held
accountable
for
those
dollars
and
they
truly
go
to
where
the
folks
believe
they
need
them
to
go.
But
we
also
want
to
make
sure
that
we
have
the
resources
to
accomplish
the
responsibilities
that
we
are
handing
to
our
legislative
auditors.
C
So
that
that
is
is
my
concern,
and
I
believe
that
is
something
we
can
continue
to
discuss
and
as
other
legislation
moves
through
the
process
see
what
the
cumulative
effect
will
be
on
our
audit
division
and
address
that
at
that
time.
So
do
I
have
any
questions
from
any
committee
members
at
this
time.
I'll
go
to
the
chair
of
growth
and
infrastructure
where
this
bill
came
from,
who
immediately
popped
out
of
her
chair
said.
Why
is
this
bill
going
to
waste.
C
Good
evening
madam
chair
assemblywoman,
danielle
monomurano,
and
thank
you
for
the
opportunity-
I
am
the
chair
of
growth
and
infrastructure,
but
I
also
had
the
pleasure
to
serve
as
the
interim
chair
for
special
license
plates
and
has
served
on
that
committee
for
the
last
two
interim
sessions,
and
I
would
agree
with
you
that
the
addition
of
the
workload
that
could
come
to
the
auditor,
because
it
may
come
to
the
position
where
every
license
plate
would
have
to
the
paperwork
for
the
auditing,
would
be
at
an
impact
to
our
audit
division.
C
So
I
appreciate
your
comments.
We
did
recognize
that
and
hopefully,
as
we
get
through
this
legislative
session,
we're
able
to
find
the
resources
to
give
our
audit
division
the
person
or
addition
additional
resources
that
they
need
to
complete
the
task
of
abolishing
the
special
license
place.
Commission.
C
Thank
you
very
much.
Do
I
have
any
other
questions
or
comments
from
any
other
members
of
the
committee
at
this
time
and
just
for
the
record
when
this
piece
of
legislation
was
up,
I
voted
against
it.
That
was
one
of
the
few
people
in
the
state
that
voted
against
this
commission.
So
this
is
a
good
night
for
me
with
that
I've
been
waiting
a
long
time.
Thank
you
seeing
no
other
questions
or
comments.
I
believe
we
can
go
ahead
and
open
up
the
phone
lines
on
assembly
bill.
188.
C
C
C
C
C
Thank
you
very
much.
I
don't
believe
there
is
any
need
for
any
closing
comments
at
this
time.
So
I
will
close
the
hearing
on
assembly
bill
188
and
the
over
under
on
this
meeting
was
eight
o'clock
and
we
just
about
made
it.
So
it
is
eight
o'clock
right
now
and
we
have
finished
ten
bills.
So
with
that
committee
good
work,
we
do
have
one
last
item
on
the
agenda
for
the
evening,
which
is
public
comment.
C
C
Caller,
with
the
last
three
digits
four
nine
zero,
please
slowly
state
and
spell
your
name
for
the
record.
You
will
have
two
minutes
and
may
begin
yeah
hello.
A
lot
of
people
are
talking
about
honest
elections,
fair
elections.
If
you
could
introduce
yourself,
please
excuse
me
if
you
would
introduce
yourself.
Sorry
thank
you.
C
C
C-Y-R-U-S-H-O-J-J-A-T-Y,
a
lot
of
people
keep
talking
about
fair
elections,
honest
elections.
I
really
just
to
be
honest
with
you.
I
think
we
need
to
start
talking
about
the
fact
that
a
lot
of
people
like
myself,
don't
really
see
elections
as
real
choice
by
the
people.
I
think
that
elections
are
an
illusion
of
choice
given
by
the
powers
of
wall
street,
and
we
know
wall
street
has
heavy
control
of
the
casino
real
estate
sector,
which
controls
so
many
of
our
politicians
and
our
campaign
donors.
C
We
need
to
also
start
considering
the
fact
that
the
main
instigator
of
all
this
is
jim
murin,
which
I
believe
he
was
behind
the
current
and
previous.
I'm
sorry,
sir.
We're
not
excuse
me,
sir
you're
you're
not
allowed
to
call
people
out
personally,
that's
not
appropriate.
We
do
not
use
public
comment.
We
do
not
use
public
comment
to
attack
other
people
in
the
state.
If
you'd
like
to
express
your
opinion,
that's
perfectly
fine,
but
the
committee
will
not
accept
attacks
on
other
people
in
this
state.
C
C
The
fact
is
that
we
need
a
non-partisan
solution
to
overthrow
the
system,
or
maybe
we
could
hope
an
economic
collapse
will
hopefully
change
the
game,
but
I
don't
feel
that
our
government
state,
local
and
federal
represents
the
will
of
the
people.
We
have
to
consider
something
that
is
more
representative
of
everyday
americans,
not
a
handful
of
wealthy
donors.
Thank
you
broadcast
services.
Do
we
have
anyone
else
for
public
comment.
C
Chair
the
public
comment
line
is
open
and
working.
However,
we
have
no
more
callers
at
this
time.
Thank
you
very
much
broadcast
services
for
all
of
your
assistance
and
helping
us
be
successful
this
evening.
We
greatly
appreciate
it
committee
members.
Thank
you
for
all
your
hard
work
time
and
attention.
I
will
see
you
friday,
after
senate
finance
and
ways
and
means
meet.
We
will
have
an
independent
meeting
back
in
this
room
to
process
some
more
bills
friday
morning.