►
From YouTube: 5/14/2021 - Senate Committee on Government Affairs
Description
For agenda and additional meeting information: https://www.leg.state.nv.us/App/Calendar/A/
Videos of archived meetings are made available as a courtesy of the Nevada Legislature.
The videos are part of an ongoing effort to keep the public informed of and involved in the legislative process.
All videos are intended for personal use and are not intended for use in commercial ventures or political campaigns.
Closed Captioning is Auto-Generated and is not an official representation of what is being spoken.
A
Perfect.
Thank
you
very
much
good
afternoon.
Welcome
to
the
committee
on
the
senate
government
affairs
committee
we're
starting
a
little
late
today.
We
have
lots
of
meetings
going
on
thanks
to
everyone,
who's
joining
us
and
thanks
for
your
participation
will
the
secretary
please
call
the
roll.
A
Here
I
almost
said:
hi
all
righty.
Well,
I'm
going
to
skip
all
the
rules
and
regulations.
I
think
you
all
know
them
by
now
and
we're
going
to
go
right
into
the
work
session.
We
don't
have
any
bills
to
hear
today,
so
we're
going
to
go
right
into
our
work
session.
We
are
going
to
go
slightly
out
of
order
because
I
have
assemblywoman
customer
here
with
us,
and
I
know
that
she
has
many
things
to
do
and
we
have
27
bills
to
hear.
So.
A
A
B
A
Second,
second,
from
senator
hansen
and
any
discussion
on
the
motion,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye
senator
neil
aye
motion
passes.
Thank
you
very
much
assemblywoman
thank
you
and
I
will
assign
the
floor
statement
to
senator
hanson.
A
B
A
F
My
understanding
of
the
amendment,
the
the
intent
of
the
amendment,
is
to
require
a
specific
written
permit,
that's
issued
by
a
federal
state
or
local
agency.
However,
it's
certainly
a
policy
decision
that
the
committee
can
make
to
tweak
the
amendment
and
and
take
out
the
requirement
that
it
be
a
written
permit
and
have
it
just
be
that
there's
authority
from
the
federal
state
or
local
agency
to
to
have
a
burn,
regardless
of
whether
it's
an
actual
written
permit
or
not.
So
it's
really
a
policy
decision
for
the
committee.
E
And
the
only
reason
I
bring
it
forward
a
lot
of
times
in
rural
nevada,
they
will
call
I.e
the
fire
department
and
or
the
sheriff's
office
and
say,
hey
we're
going
to
burn
this
morning
and
if
they
give
them
the
go-ahead,
you
know
it
wouldn't
be
a
written,
but
at
least
they're
advising
the
sheriff's
department
and
the
fire
department.
And
so,
if
there's
a
smoke
report,
they
typically
ignore
it.
So
I'm
just
kind
of
concerned
about
that
whether
it
has
to
be
written-
or
if
permission-
I
guess,
is
what
I'm
looking
for
right.
F
Again,
the
the
the
language
that
was
proposed
from
mr
taylor
was
that
it
be
a
written
permit,
but
it
is
certainly
within
the
authority
of
this
committee
to
make
the
policy
decision
to
tweak
it
and
just
have
it
be
permission
as
long
as
there's
permission
from
the
agency,
regardless
of
whether
it's
actually
a
written
permit
or
not.
F
As
long
as
that's
just
part
of
the
motion
that
would
be,
we
could
definitely
draft
that
amendment.
I.
E
A
D
Certainly,
madam
chair,
the
idea
always
was
we
just
followed
the
existing
statutory
language
in
472
nrs,
saying
that
the
state
forester
had
to
do
a
written
permit,
but
basically
its
permission
to
burn
and,
however
the
local
county
commission
or
did
board
or
474
board
wants
to
handle.
It
is,
is
fine
with
us,
I
think
virtually
everybody
in
in
the
rural
counties.
That's
that's
grown
up
out
there
and
works
out.
There
is
familiar
with
weather
conditions,
fuels
etc,
not
really
part
of
our
problem.
D
Our
problem
is
more
of
an
interface
problem
around
our
cities
and
towns.
E
If
I
may,
madam
church,
terry
and
I
it
says,
written
burn
permit
issued
if
it
was
just
with
permission
issued
by
a
state,
federal
or
whatever
you
know
how
it
is
in
the
rules
a
lot
of
times,
we'll
call
in
call
the
sheriff's
office
called
the
fire
department.
It's
a
good
morning,
we
had
a
little
moisture
we're
going
to
do
a
control
burn.
D
Yeah,
absolutely
senator,
and
you
know
I
talked
with
with
lcb
heidi
clarkson
about
this
and
and
I
think
this
is
totally
appropriate,
and
so
we
want
to
if
we
want
to
amend
the
amendment.
I
think
that's
a
great
idea.
A
We're
all
about
amending
amendments
around
here,
so
thank
you,
sir.
We
appreciate
you
stopping
in
your
car
and
answering
a
question
or
two
we
will
amend
the
amendment,
so
we
have
an
amendment.
Thank
you
very
much
all
right
with
that
being
said,
miss
clarkson,
I
think
we're
all
on
the
same
page.
Okay,
thank
you
very
much.
Senator
gokuchi
amen
do
pass.
Second,
second
from
senator
hansen,
any
discussion
on
the
motion,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye
all
those
opposed.
A
Thank
you
very
much,
senator
neil,
and
with
that
senator
gokuji,
I
think
you
need
to
take
this
one.
Thank
you.
We'll
move
on
to
the
next
bill.
C
Assemblyville
87
was
sponsored
by
assembly
members,
wynn
and
roberts,
and
was
heard
by
this
committee
on
may
3rd
assembly.
Bill
87
in
its
first
reprint
authorizes
the
governing
body
of
a
city
or
county
to
establish
by
ordinance
a
simplified
procedure
for
the
vacation
or
abandonment
of
an
easement
without
conducting
a
hearing
on
the
vacation
or
abandonment.
C
The
bill
also
provides
that
unless
the
vacation
or
abandonment
of
the
easement
is
for
a
public
utility
owned
or
controlled
by
the
governing
body,
the
simplified
procedure
must
include
certain
provisions
and
must
not
apply
to
the
vacation
or
abandonment
of
any
street
drainage,
easement,
sidewalk
or
other
pedestrian
right-of-way.
And
there
are
no
amendments
proposed
for
the
measure.
G
B
Thank
you
very
much
chair
and
I
appreciate
all
the
hard
work
of
the
proponents
and
I
have
gone
over
it
back
and
forth.
I
spent
a
lot
of
time
with
one
of
my
constituents
who
had
been
on
the
sunrise
manor
town
board
for
close
to
three
decades
and
much
as
I
I
feel
the
intent
is
really
noble.
I
think
that
there
are
going
to
be
unintended
consequences,
so
today
I'm
a
no
I'll
reserve,
my
right,
but
today
I
just
can't
get
there.
A
E
Yeah,
thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
I'm
afraid
just
the
way
the
cards
fell
out
here.
I'm
the
one.
That's
probably
a
swing,
vote
on
this,
I'm
very
concerned,
although
I'm
sympathetic
to
you
know
vacating
a
portion
of
any
easement
without
a
public
hearing.
E
I
am
concerned
that
if
I
oppose
a
measure
it
will
fail.
I
do
think
it
needs
the
opportunity
to
move
forward
and
myself
a
lot
like
miss
nail,
don't
like
the
bill,
but
I
will
vote
yes
to
to
get
it
out
of
committee
because
I
think
otherwise,
if
I
vote
no,
I
think
it's
going
to
fail.
Thank
you.
A
Okay,
thank
you
very
much
all
right,
seeing
more
no
more
discussion.
I
will
take
a
motion.
B
A
All
right,
second,
thank
you
very
much.
Senator
neil
we'll
have
a
do
pass
from
senator
coccochia,
we'll
have
a
second
from
senator
neil
and
then
all
those
in
any
discussion
on
the
motion.
A
And
all
those
opposed
okay,
so
did
I
hear
an
eye
from
senator
gokuchiya
central
and
myself?
Is
that
correct?
Yes,
it's
an
eye,
and
then
I
have
a
no
from
or
vice
chair,
orenshaw
and
senator
hansen,
so
motion
passes
and
we'll
hope
that
that
gets
worked
on
a
little
bit.
So
thank
you
very
much
and
I'll.
I
will
take
the
floor
statement
on
this.
One.
A
A
G
A
C
C
Specifically,
this
bill
provides
that
such
a
permit
is
not
required
to
engage
in
certain
lawful
activities
on
such
private
lands
if
those
activities
are
exclusively
for
purposes
other
than
the
excavation
of
a
prehistoric
indian
burial
site
and
occur
only
on
a
portion
of
the
private
land.
That
does
not
contain
the
known
prehistoric,
indian
burial
site,
and
there
are
no
amendments
proposed.
A
Vice
chair
orange
also
moved
second,
second,
second
from
senator
neil
and
any
discussion
on
the
motion,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye
aye.
All
those
opposed
motion
passes
senator
neil.
Would
you
take
the
floor
statement
on
this.
G
C
A
Motion
from
vice
chair
orange
all
second,
second,
second,
from
senator
neil
any
discussion
on
the
motion,
all
those
in
favor
say
I,
I
all
those
opposed.
Thank
you
very
much
motion
passes
and
senator
neal.
Could
I
ask
you
to
take
the
fl?
Oh
I
just
gave
you
one
didn't
I
yeah
there's
not
very
many
of
them.
You
can
get
I'll,
take
it.
I'm
gonna
have
to
ma'am.
Thank
you
very
much,
senator
neil.
Thank
you
all
right.
C
Assembly
bill
139
sponsored
by
assemblyman,
yeager
and
senator
scheible,
and
others
was
heard
by
this
committee
on
may
3rd
assembly.
Bill
139
in
its
second
reprint
authorizes
the
governing
body
of
a
county
or
city
to
transfer
money
from
an
enterprise
fund
to
pay
for
the
capital
costs
of
constructing
one
or
more
fire
stations.
C
If
the
transfer
does
not
cause
the
balance
of
the
unreserved
working
capital
in
the
enterprise
fund
to
be
less
than
50
percent
of
the
annual
operating
costs
and
capital
expenditures
for
the
program
for
the
issuance
of
barricade
permits,
encroachment
permits
and
building
permits
and
the
governing
body
finds
that
the
construction
of
the
fire
station
is
necessary.
Based
on
an
analysis
of
the
need
for
infrastructure
prepared
between
january
1st,
2020
and
december
31st
2021.
I
Not
so
much
a
question
as
a
statement,
I
I
just
I'm
comfortable
with
this.
I
think
that
the
the
developers
should
use
impact
fees
to
pay
that
I
think
by
using
the
enterprise
fund
you're
getting
them
off
the
hook.
My
opinion
from
being
required
to
help
pay
for
these.
The
enterprise
fund
was
never
intended
for
this,
and
it
has
plenty
of
of
while
right
now
it's
flush.
It
has
plenty
of
things
that
will
need
to
be
used
from
it
and
to
then
divert
funds
for
this
purpose
seems
to
defeat
the
intent
of
it.
A
Thank
you
very
much.
Senator
gokujia.
A
A
Mr
walker,
are
you
the
point
man
here.
B
The
reserves
are
in
excess
of
the
statutory
limit,
and
so
any
of
these
funds
would
have
to
be
expended
on
other
capital,
expenditures
for
the
building,
enterprise
fund
or
otherwise
returned
or
fees
reduced,
and
so
we're
in
recognition
that
there's
an
immediate
need.
We
have
agreed
to
more
than
double
the
impact
fees
associated
with
these
fire
stations
in
the
southwest,
and
these
are
this-
is
about
accelerating
the
construction
of
these
projects,
maybe
up
to
four
years
and
getting
those
response
times
down
to
the
county
average.
E
The
capital
cost
of
constructing
one
fire
station
is
that,
do
you
build
one
and
then
you
turn
around
and
go
back
and
evaluate
the
enterprise
fund
and
determine
if
there's
enough
there
to
build
the
second
one.
F
E
Oh,
maybe
I'm
on
the
wrong.
I
think.
F
E
So
I
I'll
just
kind
of
follow
the
lead
on
this
one
in
in
my
world.
If
you've
got
the
money,
you
need
a
fire
station,
you
build
it
so
I'll
just
follow!
You
guys
lead.
G
G
I
specifically
asked
the
county
if
there
were
other
ways
to
pay,
and
there
are
three
other
ways
to
pay,
and
I
also
asked
on
the
record
about
their
budget
and
whether
or
not
they
had
the
money
to
pay
for
it,
and
I
believe
that
there's
another
pathway
and
enterprise
funds
should
not
be
rededicated
for
a
different
purpose.
I've
seen
this
come
through
the
legislature
before
and
I
will
not
support
this
not
for
fire
stations,
but
for
something
else.
So
no.
B
Thank
you
chair,
and
I
share
a
lot
of
by
of
senator
neil's
concerns
about
the
use
of
enterprise
funds.
I
understand
there's
a
pressing
need
in
the
southwest
part
of
town,
so
I
will
I'll
vote
to
support
it
and
reserve
my
right
on
the
on
the
floor
and
again
if
this
does
pass.
I
hope
that
it's
not
something
you
know
we'll
revisit
in
future
sessions.
A
Thank
you
very
much,
and
I
I
agree
I
I
know
that
there's
some
discussion
about
enterprise
funds,
but
I
know
that
we
also
need
fire
safety
for
our
community,
so
I
will
be
supporting
any
additional
questions
or
concerns.
Senator
gokuchi.
E
A
Thank
you
very
much
do
pass
from
vice
chair
orange.
All
I
have
a
second
senator
gokuchiya
and
all
those
in
favor
say
aye
all
those
opposed
a
okay.
I
have
senator
neil
and
senator
hansen
as
nays.
A
All
right,
senator
orrinshaw,
would
you
take
the
floor
statement
on
that
for
right
now,.
A
Amend
and
do
pass
from
vice
to
orange,
all
second
from
senator
goku
chia.
Any
discussion
on
the
motion.
All
those
in
favor
say
aye,
all
those
all
those
opposed
motion
passes
and
I
will
ask.
A
Senator
senator
hansen,
would
you
take
this
one.
A
C
Assembly
bill
184,
sponsored
by
speaker,
fryerson
and
assemblywoman
benitez
thompson
and
heard
by
this
committee
on
may
5th
assembly
bill.
184
temporarily,
creates
the
office
of
small
business
advocacy
within
the
office
of
lieutenant
governor
to
provide
certain
information
to
small
businesses
and
to
coordinate
with
certain
state
agencies
and
local
governments
to
facilitate
interactions
between
such
entities
and
small
businesses.
The
bill
also
authorizes
lieutenant
governor
to
employ
any
necessary
personnel
within
the
limits
of
money
available
other
than
from
the
state
general
fund.
C
In
addition
to
other
provisions,
the
bill
authorizes
the
office
of
small
business
advocacy
to
establish
and
maintain
an
education
course
for
small
businesses.
Finally,
the
bill
provides
that
the
communications
files
and
records
of
the
office
are
confidential
and
are
not
public
records,
and
there
are
no
amendments
proposed.
I
Not
a
question
as
much
as
a
comment,
I
I
think
it's
a
good
bill
and,
like
I
said
in
the
hearing,
I
think
we
should
at
some
point
come
up
with
a
full-blown
inspector
general
position
to
do
some
of
what
this
does,
but
I
don't
have
any
problems
with
having
the
lieutenant
governor's
office
right
now.
This
is
apparently
just
kind
of
a
temporary
thing,
help
out
with
small
businesses
that
are
trying
to
relocate
to
nevada.
I
A
Thank
you
very
much
any
other
questions
or
comments.
Okay,
thank
you
very
much.
Well
I'll,
entertain
a
motion
still
moved
from
senator
hanson.
Second,
second
from
vice
toronto,
any
discussion
on
the
motion
not
seeing
any
senator
neil
all
right,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye,
all
those
all
those
opposed
motion
passes
and
I'll
take
this.
I
More
comment
again,
the
testimony
on
this
one
was
pretty
clear
from
the
law
enforcement
people
that
they
don't
do
this
practice
anyway.
The
bigger
concern
I
had
is
when
we
eliminate
it
from
even
being
considered.
You
heard
that
law
enforcement
does
use
things
like
this
to
determine
whether
or
not
they
have
a
rogue
copy
on
hand.
One
of
the
concerns
has
been
expressed
repeatedly
during
the
session
is
weeding
out
bad
cops
and
and
by
their
own
testimony.
I
A
Thank
you,
senator
gokuchiya,
you're,
absolutely
right
and
if
they
and
just
as
a
side
note
if
they
don't
use
this
at
all,
then
then
this
bill,
wouldn't
matter
because
it's
saying
that
so,
but
it
does
delete
subsection
two
of
section
one
of
the
bill
deleting
that
portion
so
moving
forward.
Any
other
questions
on
this
particular
bill.
I
Madam
chair,
I
do
have
a
question
on
that.
Did
that
amendment
come
after
the
testimony
because
they
they
indicated
they
were
still
opposed
to
it
at
the
time
of
the
hearing.
So
my
my
misunderstanding
have
does
anybody
know
if
metro
and
the
chief,
the
the
sheriffs
and
chiefs
association
have
now
switched
to
neutral
or
or
are
proponents
of
the
bill.
I
A
A
A
C
Keller,
assemblyville
187
sponsored
by
speaker,
fryerson,
assemblywoman,
titus,
assemblywoman,
benitez
thompson
and
monroe
moreno
and
others
was
heard
by
this
committee
on
may
5th
assembly
bill
187
in
its
first
reprint,
designates
the
month
of
september
of
each
year
as
ovarian
and
prostate
cancer
prevention
and
awareness
month
and
requires
the
governor
to
annually
issue
a
proclamation
encouraging
the
observance
of
ovarian
and
prostate
cancer
prevention
and
awareness
month.
And
there
are
no
amendments
proposed
for
the
measure.
A
Thank
you
very
much
any
questions
with
that.
I
will
take
a
motion.
A
C
Assembly
bill
211,
sponsored
by
assemblywoman,
heidegge
and
heard
by
this
committee
on
may
7th
assembly
bill
211
in
its
first
reprint,
requires
tentative
maps
for
the
subdivision
of
land
to
be
forwarded
to
the
department
of
wildlife
for
a
comment
on
potential
impacts
to
wildlife
and
wildlife
habitat
unless
the
governing
body
has
adopted
a
habitat
conservation
plan
for
multiple
species.
That
includes
a
determination
of
the
impact
to
wildlife
and
wildlife
habitat
and
was
approved
by
the
u.s
fish
and
wildlife
service
of
the
department
of
interior.
C
Finally,
the
measure
requires
the
governing
body
or
planning
commission
to
consider
the
potential
impact
to
wildlife
and
wildlife
habitat
before
taking
final
action
on
a
tentative
map.
At
the
hearing,
an
amendment
was
proposed
by
kyle
davis,
on
behalf
of
the
nevada
conservation
league
and
subsequent
to
the
hearing.
A
revised
conceptual
amendment,
which
is
included
in
the
work
session
document,
was
proposed
by
the
league
to
replace
the
amendment
proposed
at
the
hearing.
C
A
Thank
you
very
much.
Any
questions.
E
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
I
worked
on
this
this
bill
a
little
bit
trying
to
get
it
to
where,
with
mr
davis
trying
to
get
it
to
where
I
could
support
it.
Clearly,
in
the
bill
you
know
they
were
the
wildlife.
The
amendment
was
going
to
provide
for
the
board
of
wildlife
commissioners
to
adopt
their
eggs.
I'm
assuming
there
would
have
been
a
fee
in
that,
and
so
I
did
work
with
mr
davis.
The
original
bill,
as
it
came
out,
had
a
five
thousand
dollar
cap.
E
I
believe
it
was
on
the
fees,
so
I
worked
with
mr
davis
to
put
in
the
250
dollar
cap
on
on
a
map
and
so
to
give
me
a
little
more
comfort
level
to
support
it.
Clearly,
there
are
some
constructions
occurring
out
that
india
does
need
to
be
involved
in.
E
F
Chair
and
if
I
could
clarify
I,
it
looks
like
we
might
have
sent
that
to
you
without
an
update,
because
I
know
what
we
had
talked
about
with
the
senator
was
a
was
the
cap
of
the
250
plus
a
five
dollar
per
acre,
and,
as
I
read
now,
the.
F
Amendment
that's
sent
over,
it
says
10,
so
I'm
not
sure
if
that's
something
we
can
adopt
now
to
make
it
a
five
dollar
per
acre,
not
10.
Thank
you.
A
F
Thank
you
if
I
could
just
clarify
for
the
record
so
that
I
understand
the
intent
in
case
the
committee
does
adopt
the
amendment
to
make
sure
it.
We
understand
the
concept
for
drafting
purposes,
that
the
fee
would
be
a
flat
200
250
fee
for
the
map.
In
addition
to
that
250,
there
would
be
either
a
five
or
ten
dollar
per
acre
fee
and
and
that
calculation
would
be
based
on
the
number
of
acres
included
in
the
map.
Is
that
my
is
that
a
correct
understanding
of
the
intent?
Yes,.
D
B
F
No,
I
believe
I
understand
the
intent
now.
Thank
you
very
much.
A
Amanda
and
do
pass
from
vice
chairs.
Second,
from
senator
gokuchiya
any
discussion
on
the
motion,
all
those
in
favor
say:
aye
aye,
all
those
opposed
your
name
all
right.
We
got
one
day
at
the
end,
senator
hansen,
all
right
with
that
senator
gokuchi.
Would
you
mind
taking
the
floor
statement
for
this?
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you.
Assemblywoman
for
clarifying
ms
keller.
C
The
next
bill
for
the
committee's
consideration
is
assembly,
bill
236,
sponsored
by
speaker,
fryerson
and
others,
and
heard
by
this
committee
on
may
5th
assembly
bill
236
revises
the
eligibility
qualifications
for
the
office
of
attorney
general
by
increasing
the
minimum
age
required
from
25
years
of
age
to
30
years
of
age.
At
the
time
of
an
election,
increasing
the
residency
requirement
from
two
years
to
three
years
and
adding
requirement
that
the
person
be
a
member
of
the
state
bar
of
nevada
in
good
standing,
and
there
are
no
amendments
proposed
for
the
measure.
I
More
of
a
comment,
man,
I'm
sure.
No,
I
got
an
issue
with
this
bill.
Look
there's
never
been,
apparently
an
attorney
general
that
wasn't
an
attorney,
so
I
think
it's
kind
of
a
bill
seeking
a
problem
that
hasn't
existed
and
also
in
down
the
future.
Should
we
should
we
limited
that
office,
a
constitutional
office
to
only
people,
basically
that
are
members
of
the
bar
in
good
standing?
It
gives
them
immense
power
over
people
who
could
or
could
not
run
for
the
office.
I
A
A
C
A
A
Vice
chair
and
shaw,
would
you
take
the
floor
statement
on
that?
Certainly,
thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much.
Ms
keller.
C
Assembly
bill
249,
sponsored
by
assemblywoman,
haudegee
and
heard
by
this
committee
on
may
7th
assembly
bill
249
in
its
first
reprint,
prohibits
the
executive
board
and
the
governing
and
the
governing
documents
of
a
common
interest
community
from
restricting
the
hours
in
which
construction
may
begin
during
the
period
beginning
on
may
1st
and
ending
on
september
30th
to
any
hours
other
than
those
authorized
by
the
governing
body
of
a
city
or
county.
And
there
are
no
amendments
proposed.
A
Pass
from
senator
grouchochia
second
from
vice
chair,
orrin,
shaw,
any
discussion
on
the
motion,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye.
A
A
A
J
I
I
am
here,
madam
chair
senator,
can
you
repeat
the.
E
J
Jason
fraction
for
the
record
the
number
of
hours
required
for
existing
law,
and
this
does
not
propose
to
change
or
increase
that
this
is
to
incorporate
within
the
required
hours
of
this
training.
I
I
will
also
say
post
already
do
this,
and
so
this
is
putting
in
statute
what
what
is
ideal
practices.
E
J
E
J
And
just
for
clarity,
post
the
law
enforcement
agencies
supported
most
of
them
already
do
this.
This
is
it.
A
Thank
you
very
much
speaker
any
other
additional
questions.
All
right
with
that
I'll
take
a
motion.
A
C
Assembly
bill
307,
sponsored
by
assemblywoman,
martinez
and
heard
by
this
committee
on
may
3rd
assembly.
Bill
307
in
its
first
reprint,
requires
the
department
of
employment,
training
and
rehabilitation
to
prepare
one
or
more
notices
concerning
job
training
or
employment
programs
conducted
by
the
department
and
to
provide
the
notices
to
the
labor.
Commissioner.
The
labor
commissioner
must
make
each
such
notice
available
to
each
employer
in
private
employment
in
the
state
and
require
each
employer
to
post
to
maintain
each
notice
in
a
conspicuous
location
at
the
workplace.
There
are
no
amendments
proposed.
A
A
A
C
Assembly
bill
316,
sponsored
by
assemblyman,
o'neill
and
others,
and
heard
by
this
committee
on
may
10th
assembly
bill
316
in
its
first
reprint
requires
the
following.
Concerning
veterans
benefits
with
certain
exceptions,
any
person
who
advertiser
promotes
any
event
relating
to
benefits
or
entitlements
for
benefit
for
veterans
must
disclose
certain
information,
including
that
the
event
is
not
associated
with
the
department
of
veterans,
affairs
or
department
of
veterans
services
and
the
veteran
may
qualify
for
benefits
other
than
those
discussed
at
the
event.
C
In
addition,
the
bill
authorizes
the
attorney
general
to
collect
a
civil
penalty
of
up
to
ten
thousand
dollars
for
each
violation
of
the
provisions
of
the
bill.
The
bill
specifies
that
such
a
violation
constitutes
consumer
fraud
and
a
victim
may
bring
a
civil
action.
There
are
no
amendments
proposed
for
the
measure.
C
B
A
A
All
right,
that's
all
right.
Thank
you
very
much
motion
passes
and
I
will
ask:
let's
see.
A
C
Certain
requirements
related
to
the
appropriation
of
water
do
not
apply
to
the
retention
or
detention
of
developed
storm
water
flow
for
the
purpose
of
flood
control
or
storm
water
management.
If
such
retention
and
detention
is
required
by
the
governing
body
of
the
city
or
county
as
a
condition
of
approval
of
the
development
and
does
not
impair
the
pre-development
flow
or
recharge
of
the
relevant
sources
of
surface
water
or
groundwater,
the
bill
also
revises
provisions
relating
to
land-use
planning
and
judicial
review
of
certain
land-use
planning
decisions
of
a
governing
body.
C
Commission
commissioner
board,
among
other
things,
the
bill
establishes
deadlines
for
filing
a
memorandum
of
points
and
authorities
serving
and
filing
a
reply.
Memorandum
and
requesting
a
hearing.
The
court
is
authorized
to
extend
the
deadlines
and
require
all
memoranda
appointed
authorities
to
comply
with
rule
28
of
the
rules
of
appellate
procedure.
C
At
the
hearing,
a
concept
consensus
amendment
which
is
included
in
the
work
session
document,
was
proposed
to
section
2.5
of
the
bill.
The
amendment
removes
the
100
000
or
more
language,
thereby
making
the
provisions
applicable
to
counties
whose
population
is
700,
000
or
less,
which
is
currently
all
counties
except
clark.
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much
questions
on
this
bill.
E
Yes,
thank
you,
madam
chair
and
my
colleague
from
southern
nevada
pointed
out
a
piece
in
the
bill
when
it
talks
about
the
rules
of
appellant
court.
But
it
is
my
understanding
in
talking
to
the
bill
sponsor
that,
even
though
that's
what
the
language
in
the
bill
says,
that
action
would
occur
in
a
district
court.
E
That's
just
how
it's
as
we
looked
at
it
and
interpreted
it.
It
sounded
like
you,
went
bypass
the
district
court
and
went
to
appellate
court,
but
then,
in
checking
with
it
appears
that
it
is
due
to
go
to
district
court
with
an
appeal.
B
All
petitions
for
judicial
review
are
would
still
go
to
the
district
court.
Nothing
in
the
bill
changes
that
procedure.
The
reference
to
nevada
rule
of
appellate
procedure.
28
is
simply
to
the
form
of
the
brief
the
document
form
which
it
would
comply
with
the
formatting
procedures
established
at
the
supreme
court,
since
it
is
in
the
nature
of
an
appeal.
E
A
I
A
Okay,
thank
you
very
much
all
right
with
that.
All
in
favor
say
aye
aye
all
opposed
motion
passes
and
senator
okacio.
Would
you
mind
taking
the
floor
statement
on
that?
A
C
Assembly
bill
335,
sponsored
by
assemblywoman
summers,
armstrong
and
heard
by
this
committee
on
may
12th
assembly
bill
335
in
its
first
reprint
reorganizes
existing
requirements
for
an
employment
plan
that
applies
to
a
redevelopment
project
undertaken
in
a
redevelopment
area
of
a
city
whose
population
is
500
000
or
more.
Currently,
the
city
of
las
vegas.
C
These
provisions
also
apply
to
a
public
agency
that
uses
redevelopment
funds
for
the
design
or
construction
of
a
redevelopment
project
being
built
as
a
public
work
in
a
city
whose
population
is
500
000
or
more.
At
the
hearing,
a
conceptual
amendment
was
proposed
by
clark
county
and
subsequent
to
the
hearing
the
attached,
the
attached,
revised
conceptual
amendment
was
proposed
by
clark
county.
The
revised
conceptual
amendment
is
available
on
nellis
and
the
revised
amendment
replaces
the
amendment
proposed
at
the
hearing.
C
Following
preparation
of
the
work
session
document,
an
additional
amendment
was
proposed
by
senator
neil
and
is
available
on
nellis.
The
amendment
revises
the
special
act
of
the
southern
nevada
enterprise
community
by
providing
that
the
community
board
includes
two
residents
of
the
community
or
within
10
miles
of
the
community.
A
Thank
you
very
much
any
questions
on
this
bill.
Senator
hansen.
I
I
might
a
question
on
the
amendment
I
mean
the
bill
honestly,
I
couldn't
support
it,
as
is
it
was
just
there's
so
many
giant
loopholes
and
I
understand
what
she's
trying
to
do
with
it,
but
wasn't
going
to
accomplish
that.
But
is
this
now
limited
exclusively
to
clark
county?
Did
I
hear
that
correctly
700
nope
somebody's
shaking
their
head?
No,
it's
not.
A
B
Thank
you,
chair,
dondero
loop
and
I'm
sure
ms
carson
can
help
too,
but
senator
hansen
the
bill,
and
I
think
the
provisions
that
you
are
referring
to
the
original
bill
is
only
applying
to
the
city
of
of
las
vegas
redevelopment
agency.
The
amendment
was
intended
to
bring
clark
county
in
parity
to
the
provisions
that
are
applicable
to
cities.
So
the
amendment,
the
first
part
of
the
amendment
only
applies
to
clark
county.
B
It
allows
us
to
go
up
to
45
years
on
our
redevelopment
period
and
then
the
second
amendment,
the
term
community,
brings
in
counties
along
with
cities
in
the
term
of
the
redevelopment
law
and
that's
the
intent.
We
worked
with
senator
neil
after
the
hearing
on
this,
and
those
are
the
two
amendments
that
that
she
worked
with
us
on.
So
I
believe
that
that
I
believe
in
its
application
it
will
be
limited
to
southern
nevada,
but
I
would
have
to
defer
to
legal
on
that.
Well,.
F
Could
it,
I
guess
I
should
say
for
the
record,
heidi
clarkson,
with
the
legislative
council
bureau.
I
believe
the
the
majority
of
the
bill,
as
amended,
would
apply
to
clark
county
and
city
of
las
vegas.
However,
it
looks
to
me
that
the
revision
to
nrs
279
444,
that
is
being
proposed
by
clark
county,
would
apply
to
any
county
in
the
state,
so
I
think
changing
the
term
city
to
community
looking
very
quickly
at
where
that
statute
is
placed.
F
I
G
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
so
ab-335
in
section
two
actually
references
the
cfr
which
created
the
special
act
of
the
snick
community
board
and
senator
hortsford
many
moons
ago,
had
an
included
f
street
members
in
the
bill
in
the
special
act.
They're
no
longer
a
member
they're
they're
a
defunct
group
that
were
that
are
no
longer
in
existence.
But
yet
the
the
special
act
has
tied
us
to
those
groups.
G
It
is
a
legislative
created
committee,
and
so
I
wanted
to
delete
the
f
street
members
out
because
they're
no
longer
relevant
and
just
added
community
members,
and
then
I
wanted
to
give
a
10
mile
radius
outside
of
the
community,
because
when
we've
tried
to
place
people
onto
the
board
we're
limited
by
the
boundaries
in
terms
of
of
people
who
can
participate.
And
so
I
wanted
to
give
room
for
individuals
who
may
have
an
interest,
but
they
are
a
vested
community
in
terms
of
their
interest
to
potentially
get
on
the
board.
I
You
know
last
minute
stuff
we're
doing
fine.
I
will
say
I
have
confidence
in
senator
neal,
the
the
goal
for
some
assembly.
Women
summer's
armstrong
was
to
try
to
get
redevelopment
districts
into
more
troubled
neighborhoods
try
to
get
employment
there
too.
So
I
think
that's
all
a
wonderful
thing
and
if
there's
some
folks
in
there
that
can
take
care
of
some
of
the
obvious
glitches
in
the
bill
and
just
the
inconsistencies
and
you
know
getting
it
in
compliance
with
all
the
other
provisions
that
deal
with
prevailing
wage
type
projects,
I'm
for
it.
A
C
Assemblyville
336
was
sponsored
by
assembly
members,
monroe,
moreno
and
roberts
and
heard
by
this
committee
on
may
10th
assembly
bill
336
in
its
first
reprint
requires
the
peace
officers,
standards
and
training
commission
to
adopt
regulations,
establishing
standards
for
an
annual
behavioral
wellness
visit
for
peace
officers
to
aid
in
preserving
the
emotional
and
mental
health
of
peace
officers
and
assessing
conditions
that
may
affect
the
performance
of
duties
by
peace
officers.
There
are
no
amendments
proposed.
I
Do
quick?
No,
I
I
got
I'm
going
to
vote
for
it,
but
I'll
tell
you
honestly.
The
biggest
problem
we
got
with
the
mental
health
of
our
police
is
the
constant,
almost
an
escalation
every
day
assaulting
them
as
far
as
they're
doing
their
job
and
whether
or
not
they're
you
know
racially
biased
and
all
this
it's
like.
If
I
was
a
young
guy,
I
don't.
I
don't
know
of
any
young
person
that
wants
to
get
into
law
enforcement
anymore.
They
are
constantly
being
attacked
and
is
treated
like
they're,
the
they're,
the
criminals.
I
So
if
you
really
want
to
deal
with
their
mental
health,
we
should
give
those
guys
something
positive
out
of
the
assembly.
Excuse
me
out
of
the
legislature
and
that
would
probably
do
more
to
boost
their
mental
state
than
12
hours
of
whatever
this
is
going
to
be,
so
I
am
going
to
support
it,
but
I
think
we
need
to
look
at
the
bigger
picture.
I
think
these
are
the
heroes
in
our
society
and
we
treated
them
like
pariahs
for
way
too
long,
and
it
just
been
wrong.
I
E
Thank
you
and
I'll
be
brief,
but
maybe
this
is
the
one
I
was
looking
for
as
I
went
through
the
bills.
But
now
is
this
just
an
additional
training
that
is
included
in
the
the
12
hours
required.
Now
it's
not
an
additional
12
hours.
I
some
some
of
my
enforcement
agencies
reached
out
to
me
and
were
concerned
about
how
much
of
an
additional
impact
it
would
put
on
them
and
they'd
actually
have
to
have
more
officers
to
cover
by
the
time
they
did
the
12
hours.
So
please.
A
F
Looking
at
the
language
of
the
bill,
this
annual
behavioral
visit
and
wellness
visit
is
a
separate
requirement,
so
there
would
be
the
existing
requirement
that
they
do
the
12
hours
of
continuing
education
in
specific
in
certain
courses
and
then
in
addition
to
that,
there
would
be
the
annual
behavioral
wellness
visit.
So
there
are
two
separate
requirements.
E
And
there
were
no
amendments
to
this
bill.
No,
sir,
all
right!
Thank
you,
madam
chair
I'll,
support
it,
but
would
like
to
reverse
reserve
my
right.
G
So
I
I
think
this
is
what
the
the
hearing
I
missed
so
when
we
say
visit
because
the
way
I
read
it,
I
thought
that
it
was
up
to
the
12
hours
and
when
I
looked
at
the
list
that
this
would
be,
in
addition
to,
it
would
be
training
on
mental
health
or
at
least
having
education
on
how
to
deal
with
their
mental
health.
But
is
this
a
is
this
mandating
a
mental
health
visit
with
some
psychiatrist.
F
Madam
chair,
this
allows
the
post
commission
to
set
the
standards
for
it,
so
there
are
no
specific
requirements
in
the
bill
that
would
require
that
would
mandate
it
be
with
a
specific
type
of
mental
health
professional
that
would
be
determined
by
post
in
regulation.
So
again,
it
is
a
separate
requirement
that
is
in
addition
to
the
12
hours
of
continuing
education,
but
what
the
requirements
will
be
for
the
annual
behavioral
wellness
visit
are
going
to
need
to
be
determined
by
posts
by
regulation.
G
So
I
mean
thanks,
madam
chair
for
the
question
I
I'm
I
I
process
that
because
I
know
this
was
a
thought
I
just
I'm
not
sure
about
this
bill.
I
I
don't.
I
don't
know
how
that
works
like
all
right
and
I
know
what
what
they
were
trying
to
do
and
where
they
were
trying
to
go.
But
my
my
largest
concern
with
the
idea
was
how
officers
are
viewed
in
in
terms
of
situations
that
they
have
encountered
and
how
you
know.
G
I
guess
the
bias
that
may
be
there
and
I
guess,
because
it's
being
done
by
post,
I
guess
there's
probably
more
of
an
understanding
about
what
officers
go
through,
but
they
I
you
know
they
go
through
a
lot.
So
I
will
I'll
vote
it
out.
A
Thank
you
very
much
additional
questions
or
concerns
okay,
well
scene.
None.
I
will
accept
a
motion.
Some.
A
A
I,
with
the
reservation
as
well
all
right
with
that
being
said,
motion
does
pass
and
I
will
ask,
could
senator
orton
shall
could
you
take
that.
C
Assembly
bill
378,
sponsored
by
the
assembly
committee
on
natural
resources
and
heard
by
this
committee
on
may
3rd
assembly.
Bill
378
in
its
first
reprint,
revises
certain
provisions
regarding
the
purpose
of
the
state
land
office,
division
of
state
lands,
department
of
conservation
and
natural
resources
to
include
selecting
managing
and
where
appropriate,
disposing
of
state
lands.
Additionally,
the
measure
eliminates
the
duty
to
identify
lands
that
are
suitable
for
acquisition
and
revises
various
other
duties
of
the
administrator
of
the
division
and
of
the
agency.
I
I'm
sure
is
this:
the
one
we
were
talking
about:
sagebrush
rebellion.
I
think
this
is
isn't
it
okay.
I
do
have
some
comments.
This
bill's,
a
big
mistake.
I
mean
whether
you
feel
good
about
the
sagebrush
rebellion
or
not.
The
truth
is
this
that
the
sagebrush
rebellion
has
done
more
to
help
the
state
of
nevada
have
some
level
of
ability
to
fight
back
against
the
federal
government
and
the
fact
that
chair
watts
was
saying
you
know,
that's
unconstitutional
that
I
I
just
don't
think
he.
I
You
know,
I
think,
about
dick
carver
open
up
the
road
in
jefferson
canyon
that
had
such
a
positive
impact
for
all
the
people.
Listening
who
like
to
go
mountain
biking
and
like
to
have
outdoor
recreation,
because
by
keeping
the
roads
and
trails
open
in
the
state
of
nevada,
which
the
federal
government,
both
both
the
forest
service
and
the
blm,
were
aggressively
shutting
down.
I
We
now
have
those
those
outdoor
opportunities
there,
so
you
know
I,
with
all
due
respect
to
the
people
that
want
to
badmouth
the
sagebrush
rebellion
and
claim
it's
unconstitutional.
You
ought
to
think
some
of
this
through,
because
nevada
is
absolutely
at
the
mercy
of
49
other
states.
When
we
say
that
we
have
the
public
domain
in
the
state
of
nevada,
the
public
domain
is
controlled
by
330
million
other
people.
I
We
are
three
million
people
and
the
sagebrush
rebellion
and
the
and
the
concept
behind
it
was
trying
to
once
again
put
us
on
somewhat
of
an
equal
footing
arrangement
with
the
other
states.
So
I'm
a
strong
no
on
this,
and
I
think
we
should
really
think
these
things
through
before
we
throw
away
the
little
bit
of
state
sovereignty
that
we
still
maintain.
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
E
E
A
Okay,
any
additional
questions
vice
chair
and
shaw.
B
Chair
you
know
I,
I
respect
you
know
my
colleagues
senator
hansen,
senator
gokuchiya.
I
I'm
gonna
vote
to
support
the
bill
reserve
my
right
out
of
committee
and
maybe
look
at
it
a
little
more
closely.
You
know
I
understand
where
the
sponsor's
coming
from
and
I
will
support
it
at
a
committee
just
want
to
reserve
my
right,
maybe
think
about
a
little
more
on
the
floor.
A
Thank
you
very
much,
so,
just
as
a
as
a
note,
my
my
notes
note
that
the
state
lands
and
eureka
county,
etc
came
in
a
neutral
on
this,
and
we
had
ms
hansen
was
in
opposition
and
support
was
conservation
league.
So
just
since
we
don't
have
mr
watts
here.
I
just
wanted
to
put
that
out.
There.
A
Oh,
I
don't
have
that
sir
okay,
all
right.
Thank
you
very
much
all
right.
If
I
don't
hear
any
additional
questions
or
comments,
I
will
accept
a
motion.
A
Thank
you
very
much,
all
those
in
favors
any
discussion
on
the
motion.
All
those
in
favor
say
aye
all
those
opposed.
A
B
A
C
In
addition
to
other
provisions,
the
bill
revises
the
permitted
uses
of
these
proceeds
by
providing
that
the
fees
may
be
used
in
the
office
of
the
county
clerk
to
acquire,
improve
support
or
maintain
technology,
train
employees
in
the
operation
of
the
technology
and
acquire
temporary
or
permanent
staff
or
professional
services
to
implement
support
or
maintain
technology.
There
are
no
amendments
proposed
for
the
measure.
A
C
Assembly
bill
409,
sponsored
by
the
assembly
committee
on
government
affairs
and
heard
by
this
committee
on
may
10th
assembly
bill
409,
requires
the
peace
officers,
standards
and
training
commission
to
adopt
regulations
concerning
the
recruitment
and
selection
of
peace
officers,
which
must
include
evaluations
to
identify
implicit
bias
on
the
part
of
a
peace
officer
on
the
basis
of
race,
color,
religion,
national
origin,
physical
or
mental
disability,
sexual
orientation
or
gender
identity
or
expression.
And
there
are
no
amendments
proposed.
I
More
comment:
you
know
we're
already
having
a
hard
enough
time,
recruiting
police
officers
and
now
we're
going
to
essentially
before
they
get
a
shot
at
the
job
start
asking
them
stuff.
That,
frankly,
is
very
personal
and
is
nobody's
business.
I
E
Again
I'll
be
a
lot
briefer,
but
I
am
concerned
about
maybe
there's
some
overreaching
in
how
far
they're
going
to
carry
these
evaluations.
This
is
not
something
you'd
be
asking
can't
ask
if
you
were
going
to
work
in
the
private
sector,
so
that
concerns
me.
It's
clearly
a
violation
of
their
civil
rights.
A
J
Sure
thank
you
for
the
record
jason
fryerson,
some
even
for
district
8.,
I
I
am
certainly
available,
but
for
for
the
energy
of
supporting
police
officers.
I
I
would
like
to
remind
the
committee
that
this
bill
came
at
the
request
of
police
officers,
who
don't
want
people
to
be
hired
amongst
their
ranks
that
come
in
with
problems,
and
so,
rather
than
have
them
amongst
their
ranks
to
have
to
deal
with
it.
J
They
would
rather
look
at
it
at
the
screening
process,
and
I
would
also
only
point
out
that
in
the
private
sector,
you're
not
given
a
gun
and
a
badge
and
given
the
responsibility
of
protecting
the
community,
and
so
I
certainly
respect
the
opinions
and
and
wishes
of
those
officers
that
don't
want
problem
hires,
and
this
isn't
like
the
other
bills
where
this
is
annual.
J
This
is
a
screening,
and
certainly
in
the
private
sector,
when
you
are
screening,
applications
and
doing
interviews,
you're
interviewing
candidates
based
on
issues,
they
may
have
that
may
impact
their
ability
to
do
the
job,
and
so,
in
the
same
vein,
this
is
providing
screening
so
that
people
who
are
being
being
given
the
tremendous
opportunity
of
protecting
the
community
to
join
the
ranks
of
those
heroes
that
are
are
protecting
the
community
and
putting
their
life
at
risk
every
day.
J
If
they
say
they
don't
want
problem
hires
to
join
their
ranks
and
that
they
can
mitigate
the
damage
by
looking
at
it
before
they
ever
get
hired.
I
I
think
that
that
wisdom
and
and
advice
is,
is
well
worth
consideration.
J
I
J
Well,
and
thank
you
thank
you,
senator
and
I
appreciate
the
concern
respectfully
as
the
lawyer
in
this
engagement.
I
disagree
with
you
about
you
being
disallowed
to
be
able
to
ask
certain
questions
under
the
law
you
absolutely
are
and
if
I
was
applying
for
a
job
to
work
with
you,
you
would
want
to
know
whether
or
not
I
had
biases
that
would
impact
my
ability
to
do
the
job.
J
So,
for
example,
you
don't
have
to
ask
me
my
you
know
sexual
preference,
that's
against
the
law,
but
if
you're
interviewing
me-
and
you
don't
know-
and
you
hire
me-
and
I
say
absolutely-
I
will
never
ever
go
into
the
house
of
a
hispanic
person
because
I
despise
them
well.
That
affects
your
business
model.
J
You
are
absolutely
allowed
to
ask
that
question
or
to
follow
up
if
it
comes
up
either
in
the
resume
application
or
answers
to
other
questions,
but
I'll
also
say
that
I
left
it
non-specific
on
purpose,
so
that
post,
who
is
in
charge
of
this
officers
who
are
in
charge
of
this,
can
dictate
the
kind
of
questions
that
are
asked
in
the
process.
So
we
are
leaving
it
up
to
the
law
enforcement
community
to
come
up
with
regulations
to
to
screen
people
these
type
of
questions,
but
you
would
certainly
want
to
know
not
you
know.
J
J
No,
I
don't
think
that's
the
point,
although
you're
not
prohibited
by
law
from
asking
that
question,
but
that
being
the
case,
if
I
ask
you,
you
know
what
what
you
do
in
your
spare
time,
and
you
tell
me
something
that
indicates
that
you
have
an
issue
with
race
and
that
affects
your
business
model
and
your
ability
to
interact
with
those
folks
if
you
care
as
a
private
employer.
J
I
think
that
those
in
government
that
have
a
higher
level
of
accountability,
particularly
in
law
enforcement,
should
justifiably
be
be
subject
to
screening,
to
prevent
them
from
infiltrating
a
law
enforcement
agency
and
creating
the
problem,
some
of
which
we're
seeing
now
that
officers
approached
me
to
request
help
in
preventing
from
being
part
of
of
the
problem,
because,
as
I
stated
when
we
had
the
hearing,
even
law
enforcement
officers,
don't
want
those
bad
apples
and
you
can't
screen
it
and
deal
with
it.
J
Unless
you
have
the
ability
to
explore
it,
and
so
this
is
something
that
I
think
the
director
of
post
is
able
to
come
up
with
regulations
about
exactly
how
and
the
questions
to
ask.
But
if
you're
prohibited
from
exploring
that
and
considering
whether
or
not
somebody
is
going
to
be
hesitant
to
go
to
a
community
of
color
in
order
to
provide
police
protection
or
if
somebody's
going
to
go,
show
up
at
a
domestic
violence.
Altercation
and
automatically
have
an
issue
with
the
woman
because
they
have
gender
issues.
J
Those
are
things
that
I
think
an
employer
would
want
to
know,
and
so
that
was
the
intention
at
the
request
of
law
enforcement
officers
at
and
and
would
be
shepherded
by
the
law
enforcement
community
to
implement
that.
I
think
I
trust
their
ability
to
take
that
into
consideration
when
they
are
hiring
their
folks.
I
Well,
mr
speaker,
my
old
friend
I
will
have
to
respectfully
disagree
and
you'll
have
to
take
we'll
have
to
debate
this
sometime.
We
can't
do
in
front
of
the
committee
on
business
but
I'll
respectfully,
disagree
and
thank
you
very
much
for
for
explaining
it
to
me
a
little
a
little
bit
further,
but
I'm
still
very
uncomfortable
with
the
concept.
So
thank
you,
madam
chair.
Thank
you,
mr
speaker.
A
Okay,
speaker,
thank
you
for
joining
us
today.
It's
been
just
a
pleasure,
sir.
All
righty,
with
that
I
will
accept
a
motion.
It's.
A
So
move
to
a
second
senator
neil
second,
thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you
very
much.
Any
discussion
on
the
motion.
Seeing
none
all
those
in
favor
say
I
I
all
those
opposed.
Thank
you.
I
have
two
nays
senator
goku,
chia
and
senator
hansen.
The
rest
arise
and
with
that
senator
neil,
can
I
hand
you
the
floor
statement
on
that.
I
I
I
still
have
some
reservations
on
it,
but
it
was
quite
a
bit
different
than
what
I
understood
and
I'm
in
construction,
so
I
must
say
some
of
the
terminologies
and
who
does
what
was
a
bit
confusing,
but
after
discussing
it
with
them,
I
think
the
bill
has
a
probably
a
lot
of
merit
and
the
amendments
have
made
it
better
as
well,
so
I
will
be
supporting,
but
with
a
little
bit
of
a
reservation.
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
E
I
also
will
be
supporting
this
bill
had
long
discussions
with
with
the
sponsors
on
it,
and
I
also
really
didn't
understand
it,
but
this
construction
manager
as
as
agent
really
is
what
I
was
calling
and
they
didn't
I'm
so
old
that
they
didn't
know
what
a
clerk
of
the
works
meant,
but
anyway,
it's
very
similar.
But
there
are
some
protections
in
this
build
to
make
sure
you're,
not
a
seymour
and
then
come
back
and
actually
oversee
another
cmar.
G
Yeah
yeah
thanks.
Madam
chair,
I
I
was
wondering
if
I
could
get
an
explanation,
because
I
wasn't.
I
wasn't
here
for
this
one
and
then
skip
emailed
the
assemblyman
former
assemblyman
daily
emailed
me.
But
I
didn't
get
a
chance
to
ask
the
question.
It
was
in
section
two
of
the
bill
about
this
selecting
the
agent.
B
Would
you
like
to
take
a
brief
pause?
We
can
mute
the
system
and
I
can
assist,
live.
A
C
H
H
H
So
I
believe
that
without
limitation
refers
only
to
that
five
percent,
bitter
preference
which
you
have
to
earn-
and
I
believe
it's
awarded
or
given
to
the
state
contractors
board
if
you
perform
at
least
60
months
worth
of
work
in
the
state
of
nevada
and
pay
taxes
at
a
certain
level
in
order
to
get
that
bitter
preference
and
then
there's
a
form.
You
turn
in
when
you
submit
your
proposal
to
to
prove
that
you
have
that.
So
I
believe
that
is
the
context
in
which
that
without
limitation
is
used.
G
So,
madam
chair,
can
I
ask
please
mr
david
or
okay,
so
so
for
the
fair
and
reasonable
piece
who
decides
that
it's
not
fair
and
reasonable?
Is
it
the
two
parties
or
is
it
the
the
government
agency.
H
On
on
that
language,
when
they're
negotiating
with
the
agency,
obviously
the
awarding
body
is
going
to
have
the
final
say
on
that,
so
they're
going
to
determine
if
what
the
fee
is
that
the
con
or
the
proposer
is
proposing,
is
fair
and
reasonable
within
their
budget,
et
cetera,
et
cetera.
H
So
I
think
their
bargaining
power
is
with
the
public
agency
on
whether
or
not
in
other
words,
they're
not
going
to
get
dictated
to
by
the
by
the
vendor,
and
if
they
can't
reach
agreement
with
that
vendor,
then
they
can
go
to
the
next
one
and
that
language
is
also
in
situations
under
cmar
and
a
couple
of
other
sections,
and
I
believe
it's
in
the
language
that
we
borrowed
this
from
which
is
in
nrs625.
H
I
forget
the
point
whatever,
but
it's
in
the
engineering
section
on
how
they
pick
the
engineering
contractors,
so
the
awarding
body
can't
be
held
hostage
by
the
vendor,
so
they
they're
the
ones
that
are
going
to
determine
reasonable
and
fairs
the
awarding
body
or
the
public
body.
That's
going
to
spend
the
money.
B
A
A
A
You
thank
you
senator
neil,
for
being
a
good
sport.
Thank
you
very
much.
There's
lots
of
bills
that
we
heard
today
and
I
was
trying
to
pass
them
around
equally.
Thank
you
very
much
and
with
that
I
will
close
that
work
session
on
assembly
bill
410.
We
are
finished.
I
believe
we
have
one
thing
left
and
that
is
public
comment
and
so
broadcasting,
when
you're
ready.
B
B
H
A-N-N-E-M-A-R-I-E-G-R-A-N-T
my
brother,
thomas
purdy,
was
38
years
old
when
he
had
a
mental
health
crisis
at
the
peppermill
casino
and
was
hogtied
by
reno
police
for
over
40
minutes
and
then
dumped
at
the
washout
county,
jail
still
hug
tied
and
was
affixiated
to
death.
Poor
and
low
income
people
face
a
far
greater
risk
of
being
targeted,
profiled
fined,
arrested,
harassed,
violated
and
incarcerated
for
minor
offenses
than
other
americans.
A
broken
taillight
and
unpaid
parking
ticket.
A
minor
drug
is
fine
friends
sitting
on
the
sidewalk
or
sleeping
on
a
park
can
all
result
in
jail
time.
H
Jordan,
alexander
mckenzie
lindstrom
was
in.
He
was
23
years
old
when
he
died
on
5
9
2019.
with
struggles
at
home.
He
lived
on
the
streets
of
reno
from
about
the
age
of
14.
Essentially
he
was
raised
by
a
community.
Most
don't
even
realize
exist.
Who
exactly
am
I
referring
to
the
homeless
that
have
taken
refuge
along
the
banks
of
the
truckee
river
throughout
reno
sparks
area?
Jordan
grew
up
with
the
idea
that
you
did
whatever
you
needed
to
survive
for
himself.
H
Jordan,
known
as
minko
to
his
closest
friend,
didn't
need
much,
but
he
would
give
his
life
for
anyone
in
need
and
he
did
on
mother's
day
in
2019,
jordan
drowned
in
the
truckee
river
after
attempting
to
steal
food
and
supplies
from
the
local
walmart.
In
order
to
avoid
sparks
indian
colony,
police
officers,
jordan
jumped
into
the
river
and
died,
I
do
believe
reno
police
assumed
my
brother
was
a
houseless
community
member
rather
than
a
guest
in
a
suite
at
the
peppermill.
H
Even
had
he
been
homeless,
reno
police
and
washout
sheriff
had
a
duty
of
care
to
my
brother
photos
of
jordan,
remind
me
of
thomas
those
bright
blue
eyes
and
blonde
hair,
and
so
much
ahead
of
him.
I'd
like
to
suggest
you
check
out
the
minko
project
inc
or
their
facebook
page.
The
minko
project
inc
was
founded
in
honor
in
memory
of
jordan,
who
said
a
beautiful
example
of
what
it
means
to
love
unconditionally.
A
B
D
D
I
really
enjoy
a
lot
of
the
bills
that
were
passed
and
or
at
least
some
of
them
that
were
brought
into
discussion,
they're
very
important
issues.
There
were
a
couple
of
ideas
and
possible
bills
that
I
thought
were
important
addressing
in
the
next
session.
One
of
it
is
how
casinos
ban
or
86
people
in
their
properties.
I
have
heard
a
lot
of
complaints
that
casino
security
is
increasingly
abusive.
D
They
tag
and
target
people
for
useless
things
like
suspicious
vehicle.
They
force
them
to
give
their
id
and
if
they
don't,
they
drag
him
to
his
police.
They
go
after
them
for
non-criminal
related
actions,
and
I
think
this
really
needs
to
be
addressed.
A
lot
of
people
are
not
just
concerned
about
police.
I
think
that
hotel
security
has
gone
out
of
hand,
and
another
issue
is
car.
Insurance.
Car
insurance
rates
have
gone
up
a
lot
over
the
last
few
years.
A
lot
of
people
argue
it's
hurting
poor
people
and
even
minorities.
D
I
believe
the
state
of
california
has
made
some
measures
to
make
sure
that,
first
of
all
that
car
insurance
companies
cannot
ask
education
or
ethnic
or
racial
background,
because
that
also
affects
the
car
insurance
rate
and
not
to
mention
all
that
jacks
up
prices
and
low
income
people
disproportionately
cannot
afford.
So
I
was
hoping
if
you
can
look
into
that,
but
not
to
mention.
I
think
we
are
too
car
dependent.
We
drive
too
much
thanks
to
our
urban
planning.
D
A
B
A
Thank
you
very
much.
I
surely
appreciate
broadcasting
you
being
with
us
this
late
in
the
evening
and
and
helping
us
get
through
this
work
session.
A
So
with
that
committee
I
am
not
sure
if
we'll
be
off
the
floor,
to
have
a
meeting
on
monday,
so
stay
tuned
for
that
announcement
other
than
that
I'll
see
some
of
you
in
the
morning
at
finance
and
thank
you
very
much
staff
as
well.
So
this
meeting
is.