►
From YouTube: 5/12/2021 - Senate Committee on Government Affairs
Description
For agenda and additional meeting information: https://www.leg.state.nv.us/App/Calendar/A/
Videos of archived meetings are made available as a courtesy of the Nevada Legislature.
The videos are part of an ongoing effort to keep the public informed of and involved in the legislative process.
All videos are intended for personal use and are not intended for use in commercial ventures or political campaigns.
Closed Captioning is Auto-Generated and is not an official representation of what is being spoken.
A
Vice
chair
orrin
shaw
here,
senator
gorkachia,
senator
neal
here
senator
hanson,
chair
don
darrell
luke
here.
Thank
you
very
much.
All
members
are
present.
Thank
you.
Senator
neil
for
joining
us
on
zoom,
I'm
going
to
spare
the
class
the
overview
of
how
to
and
enter
and
do
everything,
because
I
know
you've
heard
it
300
times
and
I'm
guessing.
You
know
how
to
do
it
so
we're
going
to
start
with
work
session.
I
think
because
we
have
a
couple
people
that
may
need
to
be
in
and
out
for
bills.
A
So
those
of
you
that
are
presenting
bills.
If
you
would
wrap
your
patients,
we
would
love
it.
So,
ms
keller,
when
you're
ready
go
ahead,.
B
Elisa
keller
committee
policy
analyst
and
I
will
be
presenting
the
bills
for
the
committee's
consideration
today.
The
work
session
documents
are
available
on
nellis
and
please
be
reminded
that
as
non-partisan
staff
of
the
legislative
council
bureau,
I
neither
support
nor
oppose
any
of
the
legislation
before
the
committee.
B
The
first
bill
for
the
committee's
consideration
is
assembly.
Bill
2
revises
provisions
relating
to
appointments
to
public
bodies,
sponsored
by
the
assembly
committee
on
government
affairs,
on
behalf
of
the
nevada
association
of
counties
and
heard
by
this
committee
on
april
23rd
assembly
bill
2
in
its
first
reprint,
revises
the
prohibition
against
gubernatorial
appointees,
serving
simultaneously
on
multiple
boards
commissions
or
similar
bodies.
D
A
Thank
you
very
much
moved
to
pass
by
senator
ornsshall
second
by
senator
gokuchiya,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye
all
those
opposed.
Thank
you
very
much
motion
passes
and
yes,
sir.
A
Thanks
senator
hansen
next
session,
you
can
be
my
vice
chair.
I
appreciate
that,
but
in
this
case
we'll
just
go
ahead
and
move
along
thanks
much
so
with
that
senator
neil.
Would
you
like
to
do
the
floor
statement
on
this
one
since
it
came
out
of
assembly
government
affairs?
Okay,
thank
you
very
much.
All
right,
we'll
move
on.
B
A
Thank
you
very
much
vice
chair
ornshaw.
Do
I
have
a
second
second
from
senator
gokuchiya.
Thank
you
very
much
any
discussion.
All
those
in
favor
say
aye
all
those
opposed.
Thank
you
very
much
senator
hansen
since
you're.
Looking
for
something
to
do
down
there,
how
about
you
take
the
floor
statement.
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
B
B
A
B
Assembly
bill
14
is
sponsored
on
behalf
of
the
division
of
emergency
management
of
the
department
of
public
safety
and
was
heard
by
this
committee
on
april
26th
assembly
bill
14
and
its
first
reprint
changes.
The
required
frequency
of
meetings
of
the
nevada
resilience
advisory
committee
and
the
nevada
tribal
emergency
coordinating
council
to
at
least
once
each
quarter
changes
the
required
frequency
of
meetings
of
the
state
disaster.
Identification
coordination
committee
and
the
bill
also
removes
the
requirement
that
the
state
disaster,
identification
coordination
committee
or
subcommittee
thereof,
perform
certain
duties
upon
activation.
A
Thank
you
very
much,
second,
second
from
senator
gokuchiya.
Thank
you
very
much
any
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
all
those
opposed.
Thank
you
very
much.
I'll.
Take
the
floor
statement.
B
The
bill
also
provides
the
secretary
of
state
a
county
or
a
county
clerk
for
making
personal
contact
information
available.
Finally,
the
bill
authorizes
any
person
for
whom
a
fictitious
address
has
been
issued
by
dcfs
to
also
request
that
the
dmv
display
an
alternate
address
on
the
person's
driver's
license
commercial
driver's
license
or
identification
card.
A
You
very
much
second
sec.
Second,
from
senator
gokuchiya
any
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye
all
those
opposed.
Thank
you
very
much
and
I'm
getting
you
are
a
nice
entertainer
nail.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
no,
I'm
a
yes
okay,
if,
if
I'm
going
to
I'm
just
hammering
through
these,
so
if
I'm
going
too
fast,
let
me
know
vice
chair
and
charles.
Would
you
take
the
floor
statement
on
that?
Yes,.
B
Assemblyville
22
sponsored
on
behalf
of
the
department
of
veterans
services
and
heard
by
this
committee
on
april
14th
assembly.
Bill
22
requires
the
director
of
the
department
of
veterans
services
to
establish
and
maintain
a
program
to
assist
veterans
and
service
men
and
women
in
transitioning
to
life
as
civilians.
B
The
program
must
complement
any
similar
federal
government
programs
and
is
required
to
provide
information
and
resources
specific
to
this
state
concerning
higher
education,
career
development,
physical
and
mental
health,
sexual
trauma,
resources,
housing
and
other
benefits
available
to
veterans
and
service
men
and
women.
And
there
are
no
amendments
proposed.
A
B
Assembly
bill
28,
sponsored
on
behalf
of
the
purchasing
division
of
the
department
of
administration
and
heard
by
this
committee
on
april
30th
assembly.
Bill
28
imposes
an
inverse
preference
on
any
bidder
for
a
state
purchasing
contract
with
a
principal
place
of
business
in
another
state.
If
for
a
similar
contract,
the
other
state
grants
a
preference
to
a
person
with
a
principal
place
of
business
in
that
state
and
denies
that
preference
to
a
person
with
a
principal
place
of
business
in
the
state
of
nevada.
A
A
Okay,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye
all
those
opposed.
Thank
you
very
much
and
vice
chair
orange
shawl.
I
think
this
one
says
you.
B
Assembly
bill
55,
sponsored
on
behalf
of
the
city
of
north
las
vegas
and
heard
by
this
committee
on
april
26th
assembly
bill
55
in
its
first
reprint
revises
the
charter
of
the
city
of
north
las
vegas.
The
bill
creates
a
charter
committee
to
prepare
recommendations
to
be
presented
to
the
legislature
on
behalf
of
the
city
concerning
all
necessary
amendments
to
the
charter.
B
A
Senator
gokuchiya,
thank
you
very
much
with
that
any
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye
all
those
opposed
motion
passes
and
senator
neil.
I
think
this
is
a
perfect
bill
for
you.
Thank
you
very
much.
B
Assembly
bill
63,
sponsored
on
behalf
of
the
nevada
league
of
cities
and
municipalities,
heard
by
this
committee
on
april
26th
assembly
bill
63
in
its
first
reprint,
authorizes
a
local
government
to
use
money
from
its
fund
established
to
stabilize
the
operation
of
government
and
mitigate
the
effects
of
a
natural
disaster.
To
also
use
those
funds
to
mitigate
the
effects
of
a
declared
emergency.
A
B
One
assembly
bill
70
sponsored
on
behalf
of
the
division
of
welfare
and
supportive
services
of
the
department
of
health
and
human
services
heard
by
this
committee
on
april
21st
assembly.
Bill
70
requires
the
division
of
welfare
and
supportive
services
of
the
department
of
health
and
human
services
to
deposit
within
two
working
days.
Any
child
support
payments.
It
accumulates
in
excess
of
ten
thousand
dollars
on
any
day.
The
bill
provides
an
exception
for
money
for
which
the
division
is
unable
to
identify
the
obligee
within
that
period.
B
A
B
Assembly
bill
71
sponsored
on
behalf
of
the
division
of
natural
heritage
of
the
state
department
of
conservation
and
natural
resources
heard
by
this
committee
on
april
30th
assembly
bill
71
in
its
first
reprint
makes
confidential
the
specific
location
of
a
rare
plant,
animal
species
or
ecological
community.
It
is
included
in
data
systems
maintained
by
the
division
of
natural
heritage
of
the
state
department
of
conservation
and
natural
resources.
A
Thank
you
very
much,
thank
you
very
much
senator
gokuchiya
and
then
vice
chair.
Second,
any
discussion
on
the
motion.
D
B
Assembly
bill
76
sponsored
on
behalf
of
the
department
of
veterans
services
heard
by
this
committee
on
april
23rd
assembly,
bill
76,
authorizes
the
director
of
the
department
of
veterans
services
to
establish
and
operate
programs
to
provide
adult
day
health
care
services
to
veterans.
These
services
are
limited
to
the
extent
that
federal
funding
is
available.
A
B
And
the
final
bill
in
the
work
session
document
is
assembly
bill
77
sponsored
on
behalf
of
the
department
of
veterans
services
heard
by
this
committee
on
april
14th
assembly.
Bill
77
requires
the
director
of
the
department
of
veteran
services
to
assist
veterans
experiencing
homelessness
by
connecting
veterans
to
housing
and
other
support
organizations
and
create
coordinate
and
support
veterans,
suicide
prevention
programs
and
resources.
A
D
A
A
H
Please
go
ahead.
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
chair
and
members
of
the
committee
for
the
record.
I
am
rochelle
nguyen
and
I
am
representing
representing
assembly
district
10
in
southern
nevada
clark,
county
kind
of
central
las
vegas,
I'm
here
to
present
assembly
bill
186
for
your
consideration.
H
Ticket
and
arrest
quotas
are
a
perverse
policing
activity
that
may
times
be
used
to
fund
police
departments
and
evaluate
the
effectiveness
of
police
officers.
They
there's
use
of
damages
and
these
quotas
are
set.
Predetermined.
Number
of
transaction
peace
officers
are
required
to
issue
given
in
a
given
time
frame.
I
will
tell
you
that
almost
all
of
the
law
enforcement
agencies
here
do
have
policies
in
place
where
quotas
are
not
allowed
and
do
not
exist.
H
I
always
sit
there
and
talk,
and
I'm
sure
everyone
has
this
experience
where
it's
the
end
of
the
month
and
you
see
a
bunch
of
people
being
pulled
over
for
speeding,
and
the
first
thing
everyone
says
is:
it
must
be
that
time
of
the
month
they
must
be
trying
to
meet
their
quotas,
so
that
is
kind
of
what
I
am
referring
to,
and
hopefully
that
is
not
a
practice
that
is
in
place,
but
assembly
bill
186
would
ensure
that
it
is
not
allowed
to
be
a
policy
in
any
of
our
law
enforcement
agencies
that
deal
with
traffic
safety.
H
You
will
see
that
I
submitted
and
I
apologize
for
the
late
nature
of
this.
I
did
submit
a
conceptual
amendment
for
your
consideration.
It
was
submitted
late
this
afternoon,
so
I
do
apologize
to
members
of
the
committee
for
that.
H
There
were
individuals
in
the
assembly
side
that
wanted
to
be
added
on
as
a
part
of
an
amendment
and
unfortunately,
it
did
not
make
its
way
prior
to
the
vote
in
the
assembly.
So
the
first
part
of
that
is
to
clarify
the
new
added
sections
that
were
originally
proposed
in
assembly.
Bill
186
were
section
one,
and
there
was
subsection
one
and
subsection
two.
The
existing
language
in
that
statute
were
is
already
existing
in
this
subsection.
H
So
this
and
tends
to
delete
subsection
two.
There
was
an
amendment
on
the
assembly
side
that
changed
some
of
the
language
in
subsection
one,
but
you
have
already
that's
already
incorporated
in
the
bill
as
I'm
presenting
it
today
with
that,
I'm
going
to
actually
keep
it
short
and
sweet,
and
I'm
going
to
actually
turn
this
over
to
eddie
ablesser
from
try
strategies
to
provide
any
additional
comments
on
the
bill.
With
your
permission,
chair.
Thank
you.
J
Thank
you
and
chair,
honourable
members
of
the
committee
chair,
dondera
lupe,
for
the
record.
My
name
is
eddie
abolisher
with
try
strategies
e-d-d-I-e-a-b-l-e-s-e-r
we're
proud
to
represent
the
nevada
police
union,
the
first
statewide
category,
one
peace
officer
union
encompassing
the
brave
men
and
women
from
state
parks,
university,
police,
game
wardens
and
department
of
public
safety.
I
want
to
thank
assemblywoman
nguyen
for
her
leadership
and
sponsorship
of
this
really
important
issue.
J
Our
goal,
the
nevada
police
union,
is
to
support
reasonable
and
common
sense
policies
that
drive
directly
at
the
primary
goal
of
law
enforcement,
keep
all
in
our
community
safe.
It
is
with
that
intent
that
the
nevada
police
union
has
brought
the
problem
of
quotas
in
citations
and
arrests
commonly
known
as
policing
for
profit.
I
want
to
be
very
clear.
J
The
practice
of
demanding
a
specific
quantity
of
citations
and
arrests
from
management
to
line
level
does
not
adhere
to
the
mission
of
keeping
everyone
in
our
community
safe,
while
evaluating
officers
based
on
the
number
of
citations
and
arrests
was
a
way
of
managing
in
the
1970s.
This
methodology's
time
has
come
and
gone.
J
J
An
example
of
this
is
how
our
hard-working
men
and
women
from
low-income
communities
oftentimes
cannot
afford
basic
vehicle
repairs
such
as
a
broken
tail
light
or
headlights,
not
to
mention
expire
registration
when
there
is
a
quota
by
police
management,
police
officers
will
stop
and
ticket
drivers
for
minor
traffic
violations
or
for
exceeding
the
speed
limit
by
only
a
few
miles
per
hour.
These
are
violations
and
speeds
that
they
would
normally
not
be
bothered
with.
J
Moreover,
when
officers
are
pressured
to
reach
a
certain
target
of
custodial
arrests,
they
often
times
are
forced
with
a
tough
decision
of
either
arresting
someone
and
reach
the
quota
management
mandated
or
simply
simple
issue.
A
simple
citation
for
crimes
such
as
misdemeanor
traffic
warrants
excessive
speeding,
reckless
driving
or
panhandling,
which
at
most
times
is
the
appropriate
course
of
action,
but
in
doing
so
could
be
faced
by
being
placed
on
a
90-day
performance
review
period
for
not
reaching
their
quota.
J
In
some
circumstances,
officers
are
pushed
to
average
around
100
citations
per
month,
along
with
other
tasks,
management
generally
does
not
put
quotas
into
writing,
although
verbally
they
will
tell
officers
to
push
for
higher
numbers.
Often
writing
a
ticket
near
the
end
of
the
month
that
they
may
not
normally
write.
J
She
happened
to
be
a
senior
citizen
who
was
on
the
way
to
the
hospital
attending
a
family
emergency
and
was
compelled
to
write
the
ticket
because
the
quotas
that
were
in
place
honorable
members
of
the
government
affairs
committee,
the
language
of
this
bill
is
simple,
but
effective.
Nrs
289
will
be
amended
to
prohibit
any
law
enforcement
agency
from
ordering
mandating
or
acquiring
that
any
peace
officer
must
issue
a
certain
number
of
citations
or
arrests.
J
Furthermore,
these
agencies,
originally
in
the
the
bill
without
the
amendment,
would
be
prohibited
from
considering
it
in
the
performance
reviews
and
that's
removed
and
we're
comfortable
with
that
language.
A
quota
might
be
a
good
place
for
manufacturing
companies,
but
simply
have
no
place
in
modern
day
policing.
Thank
you.
For
your
time
and
consideration,
I'm
available
for
any
questions.
H
And
if
I
could
just
follow
up
with
respect
to
what
the
intent
and
removing
that
subsection
to
from
section
1
in
the
amendment
is
during
the
opposition
testimony
that
was
presented
by
some
of
the
members
of
law
enforcement
and
my
conversations
with
other
law
enforcement.
H
They
had
concerns
that
they
would
not
be
able
to
look
at
the
quantity
of
or
a
numerical
number
of
citations
or
arrests
in
officer
performance
evaluations.
While
I
think
that
they
look
at
I've,
heard
up
to
a
hundred
different
things
that
they
look
at
in
assessing
in
those
performance
evaluations
they
did
want
to
be
able
to.
H
They
didn't
want
to
be
prohibited
from
looking
at
those
actors
that
they
deemed
to
be
bad
actors
that
were,
for
example,
I
heard
of
a
situation
where
someone
had
been
working
for
nine
months
and
had
not
made
a
single
arrest
or
citation
during
that
time.
And
so
they
want
to
be
able
to
look
at
that
number
of
zero
and
be
able
to
compare
that
and
look
at
that
in
addition
to
some
of
the
other
things.
H
So
my
intention
in
removing
that
was
to
make
sure
that
we
maintained
the
policy
of
prohibiting
quotas
and
requiring
a
certain
number,
but
also
allowing
police
management
and
other
people
to
be
able
to
look
at
those
like
objectively
in
determining
performance
evaluation,
so
that
that
was
my
intent
in
maintaining
the
integrity
of
the
quotas
as
well
as
doing
that.
So
I
just
wanted
to
make
that
very
clear,
but
we
are
open
for
any
questions.
A
A
E
H
I
I
would
say
rochelle
win
for
the
record.
I
would
say
that
we
don't
have
that
policing,
like
direct
tie
to
monetary,
like
funding
of
our
police
departments
through
traffic
tickets.
I
think
we
have
a
larger
conversation
about
how
we
fund
our
courts
and
other
systems
of
government
on
the
backs
of
traffic
tickets,
but
that's
for
another
bill
and
at
another
time
I
think
it's
a
policy
that's
in
place
to
prevent
that.
H
I
think
having
this
like
in
statute
is
important,
so
we
aren't
encouraged
in
the
future
and,
like
I
said,
I
think
it
is
something
that
we
need
not
only
that
policy
and
statute
to
prevent
this
from
going
forward,
but
also
to
encourage
people
to
look
at
their
departments
where
we
have
a
situation
like.
I
said
where
you're
driving
down
the
road
and
everyone's
like.
Are
they
trying
to
meet
their
quota
for
the
month
like?
Why
is
everyone
giving
tickets?
Are
there
more
tickets?
H
Are
people
speeding
is
traffic
worse
at
the
end
of
the
time
of
the
year,
or
do
we
have
a
situation
where
the
numbers
are
looked
at
in
this
situation
that
mr
ablesser
had
like
presented?
Where
someone
who
had
been
praised
in
other
aspects
of
their
job
as
a
law
enforcement
officer
were
being
penalized
because
they
weren't
writing
tickets
so
that
that's
my
intent
in
assembly
build
one.
E
I
got
it.
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we're
not
you
know
if
it's
a
consistent
thing
that
they're
using
to
actually
help
fund
their
agency,
we
would
have
to
have
a
fiscal
thing,
because
you
know
my
I
might
I've
never
got
to
take
in
my
life,
of
course,
so
because
I
always
obey
the
law
perfectly,
so
it
doesn't
affect
me
in
any
way.
Actually,
I
remember
very
distinctly
in
all
honesty
in
about
2008
or
nine,
when
the
economy
collapsed,
all
of
a
sudden
cops
were
everywhere
and
they
were
given.
E
I
got
like
three
tickets.
I
got
a
ticket
for
crossing
a
white,
a
white
line
when
I'm
entering
a
thing
and
the
traffic
is
complete.
The
cop
pulled
me
over
and
I'm
almost
convinced
that
they
were
using
it
to
raise
some
raise
revenue,
so
I
mean
I'm
familiar
with
it,
but
also
I
don't
want
to
get
it
so
that
we
again
go
after
the
cops,
because
the
reality
is
they're
there
to
help
keep
traffic
safe
and
keep
everybody
behaving
in
reasonable
bounds,
and
the
real
check
on
a
guy
like
me,
frankly,
is
insurance.
E
You
know
when
I
get
a
ticket
and
I
pay
the
150
bucks
or
whatever
for
speeding.
That's
not
the
end
of
it.
You
know
all
of
a
sudden.
I,
when
I
renew
my
insurance,
it's
like
wow
went
up
that
much
yeah
because
you
got
two
tickets
in
a
two-year
window
or
whatever.
So
anyway,
the
that
seems
like
it's
been,
I
guess,
watered
down,
wouldn't
be
the
correct
term,
but
it's
been
cut
back
to.
E
A
H
I
have
and
rochelle
went
for
the
record.
You
know
your
conversation,
hopefully
one
day
I
will
be
over
here
and
you
will
be
able
to
hear
assembly
bill
116
that
addresses
some
of
those
concerns
that
you
have.
A
Thank
you
very
much
all
right.
Well
with
that.
If
you
have
no
more
comments
and
we
have
no
more
confessions,
we
will
go
straight
to
our
public.
Thank
you
very
much.
All
right.
We
have
somebody
in
support
right
here
in
the
room.
Yay
all
right
go
ahead,
please,
when
you're
ready.
D
Good
afternoon,
chair
members
of
the
committee,
my
name
is
troyec
t-r-o-y-c-e
k-r-u-m-m-e.
I
represent
the
las
vegas
police
managers
and
supervisors
association
representing
the
sergeants
lieutenants
and
captains
of
the
las
vegas
metropolitan
police
department.
We
supported
ab186
in
the
assembly,
and
I
am
here
today
in
continued
support
with
the
amended
language.
D
It
will
allow
police
supervisors
to
hold
officers
accountable
to
their
policing
responsibilities
without
the
pressure
of
having
to
make
stops
for
the
sake
of
making
stops
the
effect,
and
the
goal
of
this
should
be
to
increase
the
public
trust
in
the
police
professionals
in
our
great
state
of
nevada.
We
encourage
this
committee
support
of
ab186.
A
K
K
F
F
K
F
Good
afternoon,
chair
and
members
of
the
committee
for
the
record,
my
name
is
christine
saunders,
that's
c-h-r-I-s-t-I-n-e
s-a-u-n-d-e-r-s
and
the
policy
director
with
progressive
leadership
alliance
in
nevada.
Here
in
support
of
assembly
bill
186.
We
want
to
thank
assemblywoman
win
for
bringing
forward
this
piece
of
legislation.
K
F
F
One
of
this
is
because
that,
in
the
las
vegas
area,
there's
a
lot
of
speeding
traps,
particularly
when
you
head
northward
on
paradise,
road
away
from
the
airport,
where
you
go
downward
and
it's
a
35
mile
an
hour,
and
it
was
hard
to
even
see
the
sign.
There
was
no
light.
They
hide
to
give
you
tickets
a
lot
of
my
relatives,
one
of
them,
whose
name
muhammad
feels
like
he's
being
pulled
over
because
they
can
scan
the
license
plate
and
they
can
get
the
name
and
information
because
of
that
name.
F
F
K
F
Thank
you
very
much
chair
and
committee
members
for
the
record.
My
name
is
reverend
michael
willoughby.
F
M-I-C-H-A-E-L-W-I-L-L-O-U-G-H-B-Y-
and
I
am
the
tech
director
for
battleborn
progress
in
las
vegas,
we
are
proudly
here
in
support
of
a
bill
ad186
and
thank
assembly,
woman
wen
for
her
work
on
this
bill
and,
overall,
to
make
nevada
a
more
just
and
equitable
place
to
live.
Quota
based
policing
is
terrible,
ineffective
policy
plain
and
simple.
It
encourages
officers
to
proactively
look
for
minor
violations
and
give
tickets
instead
of
warnings
creating
resentment
in
the
community
and
increasing
incidences
of
police
contact
which
put
vulnerable
communities
at
risk
by
pulling
them
into
the
criminal
justice
system.
K
K
F
Thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
committee,
I'm
chuck
l
callaway
w
a
y
representing
the
las
vegas
metropolitan
police
department,
appreciate
the
communication
with
assembly
woman
nguyen
on
this
bill.
We
certainly
support
the
intent
of
the
bill.
Lvmpd
does
not
have
quotas,
we
do
not
receive
direct
revenue
from
citations
and
there
is
no
policing
for
profit
occurring
on
our
agency.
F
We
do,
however,
have
performance
measures
and
officers
engage
in
a
number
of
activities
on
a
daily
basis
and
part
of
their
activities
that
they
engage
in
includes
enforcing
the
law.
Law
enforcement
is
a
component
of
that.
As
of
this
morning,
we've
had
45
fatalities
on
our
roadways
and
when
you
see
those
officers
pulling
people
over
on
the
roadway,
the
joining
forces
campaign,
it's
not
to
meet
a
quota,
it
is
to
try
to
reduce
fatalities
on
our
roadway
and
those
stops
take
place
in
areas
where
we
see
high
traffic
accidents.
F
Supervisors
must
be
able
to
hold
our
employees
accountable
for
for
their
work
performance,
and
I
believe
that
the
amendment
proposed
by
assemblywoman
wynn
leaves
alleviates
a
lot
of
my
concerns
regarding
the
bill.
I
do
still
have
a
concern.
In
section
two
of
the
bill,
I'm
not
sure
which
section
two
is
being
deleted.
If
it's
subsection,
two
of
section
one
but
section
two
in
and
of
itself,
we've
we've
heard
in
almost
every
hearing
this
session
about
bad
apple
officers.
F
That
section
is
the
same
issue
that
was
raised
in
fb2
during
the
special
session.
The
way
that
reads
if
an
officer
were
say
to
be
under
investigation
internally
for
use
of
force
that
resulted
from
a
traffic
stop.
If
that
officer
claimed
that
he
stopped
the
car,
because
his
supervisor
told
him
he
had
to
have
a
quota
or
had
to
make
traffic
stops,
an
arbitrator
would
have
any
evidence
in
that
case
as
inadmissible,
so
it
would
limit
our
ability
to
hold
people
accountable
for
their
actions
again.
F
K
D
Good
afternoon,
chair
dondero
loop
and
members
of
the
senate
government
affairs
committee,
I'm
eric
spratley
s,
p,
s-p-r-a-t-l-e-y,
the
executive
director
of
the
nevada,
sheriffs
and
chiefs
association.
None
of
the
nevada,
sheriffs
and
chiefs
association
membership
supports
having
quotas.
We
are
here
in
opposition
of
ab-186,
even
with
the
conceptual
amendment
showing
on
nellis.
D
We
absolutely
support
the
intent
of
section
one
bill
and
have
worked
with
and
thank
assemblywoman
when
to
try
and
arrive
at
a
language
which
ratchets
down
on
the
type
of
improper
supervisory
and
officer
behaviors
yet
gives
law
enforcement
aged
agency
leadership.
That's
who
I
represent
the
ability
to
properly
manage
these
supervisors
and
officers.
D
Then
this
bill
is
another
chip
at
the
foundation
of
your
elected
and
appointed
law
enforcement
agency
leaders,
ability
to
successfully
discipline
or
remove
officers
who
behave
poorly
in
the
special
session
last
year,
the
citizens
of
color
were
nearly
demanding
that
the
provisions
of
sb
242
be
overturned,
and
while
some
changes
were
made,
it
was
not
here.
You
are
looking
at
another
piece
of
legislation
that
again
provides
a
benefit
to
an
officer
facing
discipline,
so
a
sinkhole
that
swallows
up
a
car
in
the
middle
of
the
road
doesn't
happen
at
once.
D
It
happens
with
small
and
continuous
erosion
over
time.
Section
two
of
this
bill
is
that
erosion
and
you
will
continue
to
wonder
why
certain
crappy
cops
remain
employed
and
taking
advantage
of
the
underserved
people.
Please
give
our
law
enforcement
agency
leaders,
whom
you
elect
and
appoint
the
ability
to
manage
poor
officer
behavior,
and
for
that
reason
we
oppose
ab186.
K
K
A
Thank
you
very
much
closing
comments.
Assemblywoman.
H
Thank
you,
rochelle
nguyen
for
the
record,
and
just
briefly,
I
just
want
to
address
some
of
the
comments
that
were
made
again.
My
intent
is
to
make
sure
that,
in
statute
in
policy
that
it
is
a
priority
of
this
legislative
body
to
make
sure
that
people
are
not
being
required
or
forced
to
issue
quotas,
I
have
no
problem
and
I
don't
think
that
falls
into
this
line
where
there
were
callers
talking
about
speed
traps.
H
I
think
speed
traps
are
set
up
for
traffic
safety
purposes,
and
that
is
not
my
intent
and
I
don't
think
that's
what
this
bill
does
again.
As
far
as
the
officer
performance
evaluations
taking
it
out
of
taking
that
whole
entire
subsection
out,
I
think
alleviates
those
kind
of
concerns.
By
still
maintaining
this,
I
understand
the
objections
to
the
entirety
of
chapter
289.
H
Unfortunately,
this
bill
is
just
a
like
addressing
the
one
issue
that
it
relates
to
police
quotas
and
making
sure
that
they
are
not
a
part
of
a
policy
in
our
state.
So
I'd
urge
you
to
support
assembly
bill
186,
and
I
will
continue
to
work
with
any
opposition
as
well
as
supporters
and
making
sure
that
we
get
the
language
of
this
bill
right.
Thank
you.
So
much.
G
G
This
is
a
bill
that
pertains
primarily
to
storm
water
management
and
judicial
review
of
land
use
decisions.
As
you
may
know,
northern
nevada
experienced
historic
storms
in
2017,
stressing
and
overwhelming
our
storm
water
mitigation
facilities
in
the
reno
sparks
area,
as
it
continues
to
grow
rapidly.
Our
local
governments
have
required
new
developments
to
plan
for
similar
historic
stormwater
events.
G
G
That
is
certainly
not
the
intent
of
these
mitigation
requirements,
and
this
bill
makes
it
clear
that
no
such
appropriation
is
required
when
a
local
government
requires
storm
water
retention
or
detention
aside
from
water.
This
bill
also
sets
forth
a
briefing
schedule
for
judicial
review
of
land
use
decisions
by
a
local
government.
The
schedule
is
consistent
with
the
same
briefing
schedule
in
nevada
law
for
judicial
review
of
executive
branch
agency
decisions.
G
This
will
help
ensure
that
judicial
review
of
land
use
decisions,
proceeds
efficiently
and
expeditiously
with
that
said,
I
have
with
me
two
co-presenters,
mr
michael
pagney
and
mr
don
padlock.
To
present
the
bill,
explain
the
proposed
technical,
cleanup
amendment
and
answer
all
of
your
questions.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
very
much.
It
doesn't
matter
who
goes
first,
mr
pagney,
would
you
like
to
go
ahead?
Please.
L
Yes,
thank
you
chair
and
thank
you
to
assemblywoman
krasner
for
that
introduction.
As
she
indicated,
this
bill
really
includes,
or
consists
of
two
different
components.
The
first
one
addresses
the
procedures
for
seeking
judicial
review.
L
As
you
know,
when
an
aggrieved
person
can
see
judiciary
view
of
a
decision
by
a
local
government
by
filing
a
petition
for
judicial
review
within
25
days,
the
petition
is
really
in
the
nature
of
an
appeal,
and
so
those
cases
are
decided
by
submission
of
briefs.
However,
nothing
in
the
current
law
sets
forth
when
those
briefs
must
be
filed,
which,
in
practice
has
led
to
considerable
delay
in
ensuring
the
important
constitutional
property
rights
at
issue
are
submitted
to
courts
in
a
timely
fashion.
L
In
fact,
it's
not
uncommon
for
some
of
these
decisions
to
take
years
before
a
court
decides
them
which
leaves
the
development
status
in
limbo
and
creates
opportunities
for
abuse
by
opponents
who
are
seeking
to
simply
delay
projects
section.
One
of
the
bill
adds
time
frames
for
when
those
briefs
must
be
filed.
As
assembly
woman
crests
are
indicated
consistent
with
the
administrative
procedures
act
40
days
for
the
opening
brief
30
days.
L
For
the
answering
brief
30
days
for
a
reply
brief,
the
forms
of
the
brief
must
comply
with
the
nevada
rules
of
appellate
procedure
and
within
seven
days
of
completing
the
briefing
either
party
may
request
a
hearing,
a
few
items
to
note
on
this
schedule.
As
she
indicated
it's
consistent
with
the
schedule
and
the
administrative
procedures
act,
this
schedule
has
been
in
place
for
over
30
years,
works
very
well
in
practice
and
avoids
the
delays
and
abuses
that
we've
seen
in
the
local
government
review
process.
L
L
We've
all
heard
the
phrase
justice
delayed
is
justice
denied
and
section
one
really
seeks
to
address
that
concern
by
eliminating
the
opportunity
for
the
abuse
of
the
judicial
system
through
delayed
caring
procedures
sec.
The
second
component
of
the
bill
is
set
forth
in
section
2.5,
and
the
intent
of
this
section
is
to
codify
the
historic
practice
of
the
state
engineer
and
recognize
that
when
local
governments
require
management
of
storm
water,
runoff
created
from
new
development
that
storm
water
management
does
not
require
a
water
right
permit
under
existing
law.
L
The
simple
example
to
think
of
is
a
parking
lot.
When
it's
dirt,
some
rain
will
soak
into
the
ground.
Some
will
puddle
on
the
site.
Some
will
flow
off
to
the
neighboring
properties,
but
as
soon
as
you
develop
that
land
and
you
put
pavement
on
it
that
water
all
sheet
flows
off
of
the
site.
It's
this
increase
in
storm
water
flow
caused
by
the
development.
L
Those
hard
surfaces
pavement
rooftops
that
we're
really
seeking
to
address
with
this
bill
and,
as
she
indicated
in
northern
nevada,
managing
those
storm
water
floods
has
become
an
important
issues,
and
so
local
governments
have
imposed
requirements
on
new
developments
requiring
them
to
either
create
retention
ponds,
to
hold
that
water
on
site.
So
it
can
soak
into
the
ground
or
evaporate
off
or
detention
structures
to
slow
it
down,
so
that
when
it
does
lead
the
land,
it's
leaving
the
land
at
the
same
flow
that
it
did
before
the
development
occurred.
L
L
L
Manner,
another
thing
to
point
out
is
nothing
in
this
bill
modifies
or
affects
other
permitting
requirements
for
storm
water
management,
ndep,
construction,
storm
water
permits,
storm
water
pollution
prevention
plans
or
similar
similar
permits
regarding
water
quality.
None
of
those
are
affected
by
this
bill.
This
simply
just
addresses
the
question
of
whether
you
need
to
appropriate
a
water
right
to
temporarily
retain
these
nuisance.
Storm
water
flows.
L
I
would
like
to
speak
quickly
about
the
consensus
amendment.
So
following
the
assembly
committee
hearing,
we
worked
very
closely
with
the
division
of
water
resources
and
other
stakeholders,
including
the
city
of
reno
and
eureka
county
on
clarifications
to
the
bill
to
address
concerns
that
they
had
about
unintentionally
encompassing
other
types
of
waters
that
are
regulated
by
this
data
engineer
and
a
consensus.
Amendment
was
agreed
to.
L
We
apologize
for
the
latest
middle
of
the
consensus
amendment,
but
it
does
include
some
important
clarifications
to
reflect
the
party's
intended
desire
to
preserve
the
state
engineers
ability
to
regulate
other
types
of
waters.
L
L
Less
than
700
000
in
size,
eureka
county
had
initially
requested
a
carve
out
for
the
smaller
counties,
but
in
reflection
they
wanted
to
be
included
as
part
of
the
bill.
So
we've
now
made
that
clarification,
so
it
applies
to
the
smaller
counties
as
well,
and
the
remaining
clarifications
in
subsection
b
of
the
bill
address
the
limitations
on
the
types
of
waters
that
are
subject
to
these,
what
we
call
nuisance,
storm
water
flows
or
develop
storm
water
flows
in
order
the
state
engineer's
ability
to
regulate
other
types
of
water
rights.
I
We
looked
at
the
nrs
and
the
statute,
and
particularly
533
030,
which
exempts
water
rights
for
storm
water
management
facilities
in
clark
county
and
the
converse
of
that
is
the
other.
16
counties
are
not
exempt
from
requiring
a
water
right
for
storm
water
management
facilities
and,
as
mr
connie
mentioned,
the
historic
practice
and
current
practice
of
the
state
engineer
is
not
to
require,
and
I'm
sorry
I
hope,
that's
coming
through
not
to
require
a
water
right
for
the
non-beneficial
use
of
management
of
stormwater.
A
Thank
you
very
much
additional
comments.
All
right
we'll
go
to
questions
senator
neil
I'll
start
with
you
since
you're
on
the
zoom.
Do
you
have
any
questions.
C
C
Because
I'm
just
not
clear
right,
because
when
I
was
looking
at
the
statute,
you
have
beneficial
use,
but
then
you
have
5330241,
which
is
groundwater,
and
so,
when
you
insert
section
2.5,
it
says
that
the
provisions
in
533
do
not
apply
to
any
of
the
counties
accepting
the
amendment
700
000
and
under.
But
I
guess
you
gotta,
you
got
to
give
me
a
little
bit
more
history
on
what's
happening
with
the
storm
water
now
with
the
developers
and
if
it
goes
into
the
ground
water.
L
L
The
provisions
that
you're
looking
at
in
533.030
talk
about
the
obligation
to
appropriate
a
water
right
when
you're
putting
it
to
beneficial
use.
One
of
the
key
things
to
remember
with
this
and
sorry
about
the
light
on
my
face.
The
key
thing
to
remember
about
these
nuisance
storm
water
flows
is
they
are
not
put
to
a
beneficial
use.
L
These
are
waters
that
are
a
nuisance
flow
they're,
not
something
that
you
can
capture
and
use
for
a
municipal
purpose,
for
example.
So
these
are
nuisance
flows
that
really
you're
talking
about
how
do
you
regulate
them?
To
prevent
flooding?
They're,
not
something
you
would
capture
and
put
to
a
beneficial
use.
So
the
amendment
in
two
five
recognizes
that,
simply
because
a
local
government
is
requiring
that
temporary
capture.
L
Normally,
if
you
are,
if
I
were
temporarily
capturing
a
water
right
for
a
beneficial
purpose,
irrigation
or
municipal
use,
I
have
to
have
a
water
right
to
temporarily
capture
that
water.
This
statute's
recognizing
that
no
given
the
nature
of
these
water
rights,
you
can
temporarily
capture
them
because
all
you're
capturing
is
a
nuisance
flow
and
you're,
preventing
a
storm
water
flooding
issue,
and
that
was
the
importance
of
the
state
engineers
clarifications.
L
We
define
these
types
of
nuisance
flows
as
not
being
the
type
of
water
that
is
relevant
to
recharging
groundwater
resources,
which
can
be
used
for
beneficial
purpose
or
which
are
part
of
the
surface
water
flows
that
can
be
captured
for
beneficial
use.
It's
a
different
type
of
water
and
that's
why
it's
exempt
currently
under
the
state
engineers
practices
and
that's
how
we've
defined
it
through
the
state
engineers
recommended
language
in
this
bill.
L
They
were
doing
the
same
thing.
Essentially
they
were
requiring
projects
to
capture
these
waters
or
slow
them
down,
so
they
don't
flood
the
neighboring
properties
after
the
2016-2017
large
precipitation
events,
the
local
governments
have
increased
the
requirements
so
they're
requiring
a
what's,
let's
say,
a
higher
ratio
of
capture
than
they
did
previously,
and
this
issue
it's
being
brought
to
the
forefront
really
by
those
higher
requirements,
and
it
just
raised
that
question
well,
if
you're
capturing
a
higher
volume,
does
that
trigger
something
or
not?
L
C
So
yeah,
I'm
glad
you
answered
that
because
that's
what
I
was
trying
to
figure
out
was
someone
asserting
that
they
then
had.
You
know
beneficial
use
to
the
storm
water
and
I
was
wondering,
what's
the
is
there
any
correlation,
because
I
remember
a
bill.
I
think
it
was
two
sessions
ago
where
you
know
people
capture
their
own.
I
mean,
I
know
it's
storming,
but
people
are
still
capturing
their
rain,
water
and
and
and
then
reusing
it
and
whether
or
not
there
was
any
kind
of
interplay
with
that
issue
to
this
issue.
L
Thank
you
michael
pony
again
through
the
chair.
No,
those
are
different
types
of
issues,
but
I
can
understand
why
you
would
why
they
would
trigger
the
same
thing.
In
your
mind,
those
rain
barrel
captures
they're
capturing
water
to
put
it
to
a
recognized
beneficial
use.
This
is
a
like
a
temporary
slowing
down
of
the
water,
and
it's
either
going
to
go
right
back
into
the
ground
and
recharge
the
groundwater
source
like
it
would
normally
or
it's
just
slowing
it
down.
It's
the
same
amount
of
water
going
off.
C
So
manage
here
just
one
last
question:
yes,
ma'am,
okay,
so
so
I
have
to
just
really
quick,
because
while
you
were
talking
it
made
me
think
about,
sometimes
people
have
an
expected
runoff
because
of
the
storm
that
they
expect
to
get
so.
So
how
does
this
impact
that?
Because
so
like
you
could
be
planning,
because
you
know
it's
seasonal
right
and
so
you're
saying
you
know.
Last
year
we
had
you
know
four
inches,
and
so
I
expect
a
certain
amount
of
runoff
to
come.
C
My
way
through
this
valley
this
year
and-
and
I'm
just
wondering
you
know,
how
does
how
does
this
affect
that
and
then
does
it?
Does
it
at
all
implicate
section
one
if
someone
was
to
argue
that
their
expected
amount
of
runoff
they
didn't
get
or
somehow
it
was
impeded,
because
now
the
developer
is
a
little
bit
more
in
control.
The
way
I
see
it
developers
in
a
little
bit
more
control
to
kind
of
decide
what
they're
responsible
for
you
that
make
sense.
C
L
Okay,
it's
michael
finally
through
the
chair
against
senator
neal.
Yes,
that
question
does
make
sense.
No
this
bill
does
not
affect
that
and
the
reason
is
we're
talking
about
that
incremental
increase,
so
that
expectation
someone
may
have
today
about
a
runoff
coming
off
the
native
soil,
we're
talking
about
an
increase
above
that
amount
and
what
the
local
governments
look
to
is
kind
of
a
do,
no
harm.
You
cannot
increase
because
of
your
development,
the
amount
of
water
that's
running
off.
You
have
to
maintain
those
pre-development
flows,
but
you
can't
increase
above
those.
L
A
I
think
senator
neil
kind
of
got
to
where
I
was
going
so
possibly
I
don't
have
any
either
so
with
that
being
said,
assemblywoman
d,
any
closing
or
any
comments
right
now
before
we
go
to
support
and
opposition.
Okay,
all
right
stay
tuned,
both
of
you.
We
may
need
you
and
we
will
go
to
support
opposition
and
neutral.
Is
there
anybody
in
the
room
who
is
in
support
all
right
broadcasting
when
you're
ready?
Please.
K
K
K
D
Good
afternoon,
madam
good
afternoon,
madam
chair
and
committee
members,
my
name
is
steve
walker.
I
represent
walker,
w-a-l-k-e-r
representing
story
online
and
count
lyon
county
in
support
of
ab-333
as
amended.
I
would
like
to
thank
the
bill's
primary
sponsor
assembly
woman
krasner
for
assuring
that
all
entities
would
be
treated
equally
and
accepting
our
late
amendment.
Thank
you.
K
F
F
Ab-333
also
provides
an
established
briefing
schedule
for
land
use,
appeals
ensuring
that
builders
and
local
governments
can
obtain
prompt
judicial
review
and
that
much
needed
and
appropriate
building
projects
and
development
are
not
not
necessarily
delayed
in
court
in
whole.
Ab-333
aligns
with
the
goal
of
the
builders,
association
and
nbhba
to
promote
policies
that
reduce
regulatory
constraints
and
controls
the
cost
of
development
and
home
construction,
thus
helping
builders
and
developers
bring
more
affordable
homes
to
the
market.
F
K
K
K
F
K
K
F
Madam
care
and
members
of
the
committee
for
the
record
callie
wilsey
with
the
city
of
reno,
that's
c-a-l-l-I,
w-I-l-s's
and
sam
ey.
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
provide
information
as
a
part
of
the
hearing
this
afternoon,
the
city
of
reno
is
neutral
on
ab333
and
appreciate
the
bill
sponsor
reaching
out
to
us
in
advance
with
the
goals
and
intent
of
this
bill.
The
city's
zoning
code,
which
was
updated
in
january
of
this
year
after
a
multi-year
public
engagement
process,
includes
development
requirements
for
areas
that
are
subject
to
flooding.
F
The
purpose
of
these
requirements
is
to
safeguard
the
public
health,
safety
and
welfare
of
our
neighborhood.
In
our
closed
basins,
development
plans
must
include
on-site
retention
or
retention
basins
that
are
adequately
sized
to
mitigate
the
increase
of
stormwater
runoff
as
a
result
of
the
development
to
a
minimum
mitigation
ratio
of
1
to
1.3.
F
These
mitigation
measures
are
directly
focused
on
ensuring
we're
able
to
protect
the
health
and
safety
of
our
residents
as
our
community
grows
and
evolves.
If
additional
information
is
needed,
we're
happy
to
follow
up
with
the
committee.
We
look
forward
to
continuing
to
work
with
the
bill
sponsor.
If
needed,
and
we
appreciate
them
reaching
out
to
us,
thank
you
again
for
the
opportunity
to
put
this
information
on
the
record
today.
A
Okay,
thank
you
very
much
assemblywoman
or
one
of
the
gentlemen.
I
don't
know
who
can
answer
this.
I
do
have
a
question
and
my
question
is:
why
is
it
that
we're
that
there's
not
just
a
development
of
some
type
of
a
water
runoff
area?
For
example,
in
my
district
we
have
a
soccer
park
that
was
built
and
when
it
rains
and
it
floods
to
certain
degrees,
they
close
that
soccer
park
and
it
actually
becomes
a
drain
for
that
flood
water,
a
capture
area.
L
Michael
pony
the
charity
responsibility,
those
types
of
mitigation
measures
could
be
used
and
that's
within
part
of
what
the
bill
seeks
to
protect
is
the
local
government's
ability
to
choose
those
types
of
mitigation
measures,
if
it
wishes,
but
to
do
that.
L
What
we're
trying
to
avoid
is
the
obligation
of
the
local
government
to
have
to
try
to
appropriate
a
water
right
to
use
that
type
of
stormwater
management
technique.
So
those
techniques
are
one
of
the
many
tools
that
they
can
use
to
manage.
The
stormwater
flows,
we're
just
looking
at.
Is
there
a
requirement
that
they
have
to
appropriate
a
water
right
if
they
want
to
use
one
of
those
tools.
I
Your
question
is
on
the
point
and
and
senator
neil's
point
are
well
taken.
I
I
just
want
to
assure
everybody
that
the
the
ordinance,
the
ordinances
that
govern
stormwater
management
remain
the
same.
The
practices
remain
the
same.
Everything
you're
referring
to
remains
the
same
in
this
bill
that
what
we're
attempting
to
clarify
is-
and
I
think
it
was
two
sessions
ago
when
533030
was
put
into
statute
and
exempted
a
water
right
for
the
exact
description
of
a
retention
era.
I
Sorry,
that's
a
detention
basis
you're
describing
in
clark
county
that
a
water
right
is
not
required
for
that
type
of
facility.
The
state
engineer
historically,
has
not
required
water
rights.
We
are
basically
closing
that
hole.
So
all
the
management
remains
the
same.
The
way
that
jurisdictions
manage
it
the
way
the
developers
manage
those
flows
in
response
to
our
local
ordinances
and
how
the
state
engineer
historically
and
currently,
practices.
I
So
the
questions
you're
raising
are
all
very
good
questions
and
the
current
practices
remain
the
same.
It
is
the
nuance
and
potentially
the
unintended
consequences
of
533030
that
could
potentially
subject
the
other
16
counties
to
having
to
wish
you
a
water
right
for
the
very
facilities
that
we
use
every
day
in
our
jurisdiction
and
center
kneel
directly
to
your
point
on
downstream
water
right
users.
As
a
developer,
we
are
not
allowed
to
either
increase
the
flows
off
our
property,
nor
decrease
the
flow
stuff,
our
property.
I
We
must
maintain
the
natural
balance
of
that
system
through
our
development
and
what
we
end
up
doing
is
creating
additional
water
from
the
impervious
services
that
we
are
required
to
then
hold
back
on
our
sites.
We
do
not
impact
any
of
the
downstream
water
users
by
capturing
their
water,
which
this
isn't.
This
is
new
water
created
from
the
improved
surfaces
and
and
then
we
are
not
allowing
from
a
storm
water
perspective,
increasing
the
flows
that
could
flood
down
basin
owners.
I
A
A
Okay,
I
just
wanted
to
confirm
that,
because
we
didn't
ask
that
earlier.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you,
mr
paddlock
and
mr
p,
panty
peg
boy.
That
was
a
hard
one
for
me.
Wasn't
it
today?
Thank
you
very
much
both
of
you
for
joining
us.
Thank
you,
assemblywoman
and
with
that
I'll
close
the
bill.
Thank
you
very
much.
M
The
the
purpose
here
is
to
increase
clarity
and
transparency
by
asking
the
city
of
las
vegas
the
redevelopment
district
to
report
certain
information
and
then
to
allow
that
information
to
be
to
be
discussed
with
a
committee
that
is
already
existing
in
our
community.
It's
called
the
southern
nevada
enterprise
community
board.
M
A
M
A
M
So
when
we,
when
I
proposed
this
legislation
early
in
the
session,
I
had
the
opportunity
to
work
with
mr
bill
arndt
and
his
staff
and
talk
to
them
about
the
intent
and
to
make
sure
that
we
were
in
line
with
what
they
do
so
that
they
were
clear
with
what
we
were
trying
to
purpose
the
information
that
we
want
to
gather.
I
also
added
a
a
small
addition
for
the
nevada
commission
on
minority
affairs
to
also
be
involved.
M
I
think
that
one
of
the
things
that
I've
seen
over
the
years
and
heard
many
times
in
the
community
as
I've
participated
from
community
members
is,
we
don't
know
what's
going
on.
We
don't
know
how
the
employment
plans
are
working.
We
don't
know
if
small
local
businesses
are
getting
contracts,
and
so
this
gives
some
some
stops.
There
is
a
plan
at
the
beginning,
which
was
already
in
existence.
M
What
we've
added
is
a
follow-up
in
the
middle
of
a
project.
So
if
we
know
that
a
construction
project
is
going
to
take
two
years
or
three
years
in
the
middle,
they
would
come
back
to
the
southern
nevada,
econom
enterprise
community
board
and
say
hey.
This
is
where
we
are
with
our
goals
and
our
hiring
plan
and
our
training
plan,
and
let
that
board
hear
that
information
comment
help
if
need
be,
the
same
with
the
nevada
minority,
on
nevada,
commission
on
minority
affairs
and
then
at
the
end
of
a
project.
M
They
already
do
a
report,
so
we
have
something
in
the
middle
sort
of
to
to
be
a
buffer
and
and
just
let
things
develop
as
they
do,
but
also
community
involvement,
clarity
and
then
to
tune
things
up
if
need
be.
I
was
contacted
recently
by
miss
joanna
thompson,
I'm
having
a
moment
jacobs,
joanna
jacobs.
Oh
I'm,
I'm
tired,
joanna
jacobs.
I
should
just
write
that
down
right
now
and
the
clark
county
would
like
to
add
an
amendment.
M
I
believe
you
all
have
it
and
I
am
not
even
going
to
attempt
to
try
and
muddle
through
that.
I
think
it
would
be
best
if
miss
thompson
and
miss
coleman,
I
believe,
is
on
the
line
to
express
what
it
is.
They
would
like
to
do
and
I
will
yield
right
now,
stop
watching.
A
N
Thank
you,
chair
dondero,
loop
and
members
of
the
committee.
I
am
actually
very
happy
to
be
here
in
person
in
front
of
you
spent
a
lot
of
time
with
you
on
zoom
during
this
session,
and
I
just
wanted
to
introduce
on
the
zoom.
We
have
our
director
of
community
and
economic
development,
ms
johnny
coleman,
who
might
be
familiar
to
you
from
legislative
sessions
past.
It
is
true.
N
At
that
time,
our
board
of
county
commissioners
was
looking
for
ways
to
invest
in
our
community
and
in
economic
development.
They
commissioned
a
rfp
to
do
a
study
on
feasibility
of
our
redevelopment
agency.
We
did
have
a
redevelopment
agency
in
the
past
that
was
started
in
2003,
but
it
was
shuttered
in
2009
at
the
time
of
the
recession.
N
We
know
we've
been
looking
at
the
state
of
nevada,
redevelop,
redevelopment
law
that
has
developed
since
the
time
that
our
rda
has
been
defunct,
and
we
wanted
to
look
at
some
sections
that
would
be
helpful
to
us
as
we
kind
of
go
down
this
journey.
I
would
like
to
say
that
the
commissioners
have
not
yet
voted.
This
is
not
something
that
we're
doing
quickly.
N
We
are
assessing
the
feasibility
of
doing
this
in
our
community,
but
some
of
the
these
sections
in
the
amendment
are
designed
to
give
us
some
of
the
flexibility
and
time
to
do
a
thoughtful
and
careful
approach.
I
can
hand
it
over
to
director
coleman,
I'm
looking
at
her
on
the
zoom
madam
chair.
I
can
give
a
high
level
overview
of
what
we're
trying
to
do
in
the
amendment,
and
I
guess-
and
I
could
have
director
coleman-
do
that
as
well,
but
I
don't
know
if
that
would
be
helpful
to
you.
N
So,
director
coleman-
I
don't
know
if
you'd
like
to
go
through
the
amendment
and
just
to
kind
of
our
goals
on
each
section
or
if
you
would
like
me
to
do
that.
O
Sure
for
the
record,
or
first
of
all,
you
know
good
afternoon,
madam
chair
don
darrow
loop.
It's
wonderful
to
see
you
again.
I
miss
seeing
you
guys
in
person
and
and
hello
to
members
of
the
committee
director,
shawnee
coleman
of
community
and
economic
development
for
clark,
county,
that's
s-h-a-n-I,
coleman,
c-o-l-e-m-a-n
and
joanna.
Pretty
much
did
a
really
good
job
of
summing
it
up.
O
I
was
hired
by
clark
county
in
november
of
2019
after
the
redevelopment
study
was
commissioned
and
in
looking
at
the
study
and
listening
to
the
commissioners
in
reference
to
economic
development
goals,
we
recognize
that
the
nevada,
revised
statute
279,
provides
communities
like
clark,
county
and
others
within
the
state,
an
opportunity
to
utilize
an
organizational
and
financial
model
specific
to
addressing
redevelopment
concepts
and
with
that
said,
as
joanna
mentioned
on,
may
4th
clark
county
board
of
county
commissioners
directed
me
to
bring
forward
a
and
a
resolution
that
would
allow
them
to
re-authorize
the
the
clark
or
clark
county's
existing
redevelopment
agency.
O
However,
in
the
time
that
clark,
county's
redevelopment
agency
has
not
been
operating,
there
have
been
a
number
of
amendments
made
to
the
redevelopment
law
and
those
amendments
happen
to
be
very
specific
to
cities.
So
there's
language
in
there,
such
as
applies
to
a
city
with
a
population
over
500
000
or
applies
to
a
city
with
a
population
of
of
under
300
000,
and
so
because
there
was
that
very
specific
language
to
cities.
O
County
also
have
has
the
ability
to
utilize
those
same
statutory
provisions,
and
so,
as
you
look
through
the
amendment
that
was
provided,
you
will
see
it
adds
language
that
states
things
such
as.
O
439,
this
is
a
an
ability
for
a
redevelopment
agency
to
extend
the
life
of
the
agency.
We've
added
that
language,
a
county
whose
population
is
700,
000
or
more
so
clark
county,
would
also
have
the
same
ability
as
our
counterparts
in
southern
nevada
to
do
those
things,
and
so
that's
the
language
that
you
see
throughout
the
bill.
O
We
are
just
trying
to
create
parity
with
the
other
jurisdictions
in
southern
nevada,
so
we,
the
our
redevelopment
agency,
is
not
operating
at
a
competitive
disadvantage
and
with
that
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
specific
questions
that
anybody
that
the
committee
may
have.
A
Okay,
did
I
see
somebody
else
on
the
zoom?
Do
we
need
maybe
miss
crompton
up
here
and
then
I
I
don't
know
who
else
is
on
the
zoom?
I
don't
see
a
name
so
we'll
wait.
Just
a
minute.
Miss
crompton.
G
Thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
committee
for
the
record
kelly
crompton,
representing
the
city
of
las
vegas
with
me
today.
I
have
ryan
smith,
with
our
economic
development
department,
he's
here
to
just
answer
any
technical
questions.
There
were
a
few
on
the
other
side,
and
so
we
wanted
to
make
sure
we
were
available
to
answer
questions.
Should
you
have
any.
A
A
N
No
chairwoman,
I'm
certainly
happy
to
assist
director
coleman
and
we
can
answer
specific
questions
about
the
amendment.
Just
briefly
is
the
the
sections
that
we
are
doing
are
ours
exactly,
as
director
coleman
stated,
there's
a
section
in
here
that
allows
the
redevelopment
agency,
for
example,
to
to
do
a
one-time,
re-assessment
of
property
tax
values.
If
we
hit
a
recession
again
and
property
tax
values
declined
by
a
10
percent.
This
is
existing
policy
of
the
state,
and
it
is
something
that
the
st
that
the
cities
are
allowed
to
do.
N
N
You
will
see
there
is
a
section
in
here
at
the
bottom
of
first
page,
the
page
one
of
our
amendment,
where
we
use
a
different
term
community
here
where
we're
saying
we
may
enact
our
own
procedural
ordinance
and
exercise
the
powers
granted
by
the
by
the
chapter.
You
can
see
that
this
says
a
city
here.
Community
is
a
defined
term
in
in
the
279,
which
includes
a
city
and
a
county,
which
is
why
that
you
see
that
distinction
there.
I
I'm
happy
to
answer
further
questions,
but
I
guess
we
can
leave
it
there.
A
C
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
so
so
I
have
so
I'm
gonna
start
off
with
the
softball
question.
What
are
what
are
the
boundaries
of
this
redevelopment
area
since?
Because
you
guys
have
not
been
in
play?
It
was
dissolved
in
2009
and
the
redevelopment
agency
was
only
active
for
six
years.
So
what
are
the
boundaries?
O
So,
madam
chair,
thank
you
for
that
question
for
the
record.
Sean
coleman,
director
of
community
and
economic
development
for
clark
county,
so
under
nrs,
279
436,
a
redevelopment
agency
actually
can't
be
dissolved,
so
what
it
does.
It
provides
an
opportunity
for
the
redevelopment
agency
to
be
suspended
and
unactive
and
then
based
on
a
resolution
by
that
the
legislative
body
in
this
case
would
be
the
board
of
county
commissioners.
O
They
can
reauthorize
or
reactivate
that
when
we
establish
our
redevelopment
agency
back
in
2002
and
our
redevelopment
plan
in
2003,
there
were
three
areas
already
in
existence
with
a
reauthorization
of
our
existing
redevelopment
area.
Those
three
areas
would
be
the
extent
of
what
our
redevelopment
area
would
be
considered
and
offhand.
I
can
tell
you
what
they
are.
O
There
is
a
section
that
is
bounded
by
sahara,
avenue
to
the
north.
It
is
maryland
parkway
to
the
east.
It
is
karen
to
the
west
and
then,
as
you
get
to
paradise,
it
jogs
out
goes
heads
south
on
paradise
wraps
around.
I
believe
it's
elvis
presley
lane,
which
is
basically
the
south
side
of
the
drew
crosses
over
las
vegas
boulevard
and
cuts
through
what
I
believe
is
mgm,
mgm's,
fairgrounds
and
then
comes
back
to
sahara.
O
That's
one,
the
second
one
that
we
have
is
a
small
area
that
is
maryland
parkway
again,
but
bounded
by
desert
inn
and
goes
to
twain.
So
it
covers
the
commercial
frontage
between
desert
and
twain
on
maryland
parkway,
and
then
there
is
a
third
area
that
is
at
sahara
and
boulder
highway.
It's
actually
a
very
small
parcel
and
it's
a
boulder
highway
sahara
and
it
actually
backs
up
to.
I
think,
if
you're
familiar
with
that
area
would
have
been
an
old
zodie's,
and
so
it
doesn't
even
have
a
street.
O
It's
just
a
small
area,
and
so,
if
clark
county
board
of
county
commissioners
chose
to
react,
the
redevelopment
agency,
that
would
be
the
areas
that
are
currently
included
in
that
now.
I
think
maybe
the
question
that
you're
getting
too
is
okay.
Well,
what
happens
after
that?
So,
as
miss
jacob
mentioned,
there
has
been
a
study
done
by
applied
analysis.
O
They
have
identified
what,
in
redevelopment
laws
called
an
evaluation
area.
There
are
six
of
those
areas
that
have
been
identified
and
applied.
Analysis
did
that
simply
by
looking
at
okay,
comparing
taxable
values,
crime,
vacancy
rates
for
those
areas
against
other
parts
of
the
valley,
and
so
they
identified
six
areas
and
unincorporated
clark
county
that
could
potentially
be
redevelopment
areas.
Now.
What
does
that
mean?
Well
that
just
means
they've
been
identified
per
nrs.
O
Those
areas
can't
be
added
in.
We
would
have
to
go
through
a
full
blight
study,
as
prescribed
in
nrs
279
before
we
could
add
those
areas
in,
but
to
follow
up
on
that
in
our
discussion
with
the
board
of
clark
county
commissioners,
not
all
of
the
county
commissioners
would
like
redevelopment
areas
in
their
district
right,
and
so,
if
you
look
at
this,
look
at
the
the
six
areas
on
the
map,
there
are
two
districts
right
now
that
do
not
include
any
of
what
we
call
evaluation
areas-
and
that
is
commissioner
naft
and
commissioner
millers.
O
C
Okay,
so
madam
chair,
I
have,
I
have
like
probably
two
more
questions,
so
go
ahead.
C
The
areas
based
on
the
areas
that
you
said
number
one
they
encompass
sounds
like
the
original
areas,
because
I
pulled
your,
I
pulled
a
tax
roll
for
the.
I
guess,
the
areas
that
were
clark,
county
redevelopment,
sunrise,
manor,
winchester
paradise
etc.
C
Some
of
those
cross
over
to
the
strip,
and
so
I
mean
you
know
how
redevelopment
works.
So
maybe
maybe
you
should
just
kind
of
explain
how
those
tax
dollars
that
go
into
the
space
are
then
it's
kind
of
like
I.
I
call
it
a
siphoning
because
when
I
was
looking
at
the
article
of
when
it
was
dissolved,
if
you
guys
create
a
redevelopment,
you're
taking
money
away
from
schools,
there's
a
potential
effect
there
and
then
I'm
going
to
get
into
your
amendment.
So
how?
How
will
you
deal
with
that.
O
Sure,
madam
chair,
through
you
to
senator
neil
for
the
record
shawnee
coleman,
director
of
community
and
economic
development
for
clark
county,
so
you
are
correct
the
three
areas
that
are
defined.
These
are
the
original
areas
because
we
are
reactivating
or
reauthorizing
the
original
redevelopment
agency
right.
We
are
not
starting
a
new
one,
and
so
because
of
the
way
279
436
is
written,
everything
that
was
established
in
2002
and
2003
with
the
reactivation.
O
That
remains,
as
is
nothing
changes
with
those
things
and
so
in
relation
to
the
schools.
When
you
establish
a
redevelopment
agency.
So
if
we
were
to
establish
a
new
one
today
there
is
a
hold
harmless
clause,
and
so,
if
you
look
at
279
676
that
provides
that
any
taxing
district
that
is
part
of
the
distribution
for
redevelopment
dollars
that
anything
they
were
getting
before
the
redevelopment
agency
was
established.
They
will
continue
to
receive
after
the
redevelopment
agency
was
established.
So
as
a
way
of
an
example.
O
If
the
school
district
was
getting
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
before
clark
county
established
its
redevelopment
agency,
clark,
county
school
district
would
continue
to
receive
that
hundred
thousand
dollars.
Even
after
even
when
the
redevelopment
agency
is
established,
all
taxing
districts
based
on
279
676
are
held
harmless.
They
do
not
lose
any
money,
they
continue
to
get
what
they
were
getting
prior
to.
The
establishment
of
the
agency.
C
And
thank
you.
Thank
you,
miss
coleman
for
that,
because
that
that
is
my
problem
right,
I
mean
because
technically
last
year
and
this
year
we're
in
a
pandemic
piece,
so
you
want
to
establish
this.
Bill
is
effective.
I
think
I
saw
the
effective
date
of
what
july
1.
so
technically
the
whole
harmless
period
would
kick
in
when
because
what
it's
starting
from
the
starting
from
2021
july
1st
and
then
so
there
so
so
they're
being
held
harmless
in
a
in
a
cycle
where
revenues
were
not
where
they
should
have
been.
O
Madame
chair
through
you
to
senator
neil
for
the
record
seanan
coleman,
director
of
community
and
economic
development,
the
way
nrs
currently
works
and
the
way
the
law
is
provided
in
279
676.
O
The
redevelopment
agency
holds
harmless.
They
go
back
to
the
equalization
period,
the
last
equalization
period
prior
to
the
ordinance
approving
the
redevelopment
plan.
So
in
this
instance,
our
redevelopment
plan
was
approved
in
december
of
2003,
so
the
last
equalization
that
would
have
happened
prior
to
that
would
have
been
for
the
fiscal
year
or
the
end
of
the
fiscal
year
of
2002
and
so
anything
that
they
were
the
school
district
or
anybody
in
there
was
entitled
to
in
2000
and
would
have
been
in
2003
fiscal
year
2003.
O
They
continue
to
get
that
the
way
the
law
is
written
right
now
it
does
not
allow
us
to
go
back
and
backtrack.
Now.
Miss
jacobs
did
mention
to
you.
There
is
a
provision,
and
there
is
a
section
in
there
is
a
section
it's
279
685
that
allows
for
a
reset.
So
one
time
reset.
However,
the
way
the
language
is
currently
written,
only
cities
are
allowed
to
use
that
reset
so
based
on
279
676.
O
So
that's
the
standard
we
would
need
to
move
forward
and
if,
in
the
event,
we
met
the
qualifications,
meaning
that
there
was
a
10
decrease,
we
could
reset,
which
would
reset
the
base
for
everybody,
but
unfortunately,
or
fortunately,
however,
you
want
to
look
at
it.
Those
are
the
way
the
laws
are
provided
and
the
limitations
that
we
have
right
now
under
the
way
the
law
is
currently
written.
We
don't
believe
that
clark
county
even
has
the
authority
to
do
the
reset.
If
we
wanted
to
do
the
reset,
because
it's
very
specific
to
cities.
C
So
so
that's
what's
super
confusing
because
in
the
amendment,
it's
all
it's
like
you're,
inserting
yourselves
into
the
city
provisions,
but
but
I'm
gonna,
I'm
gonna
get
off
of
the
reset,
because
I
have
a
whole
issue
about
the
taxing
and
and
the
and
the
and
the
the
revenue
that
you
would
then
be
able
to
cycle
for
your
development
plan
because
there's
an
amendment
but
there's
no
numbers
right.
C
So
there's
no
there's
no,
the
tax
revenue
for
the
area
that
where
it
is
currently
the
way
that
the
insertion
is
it
you
guys,
are
inserting
yourselves
directly
into
279,
and
I
I
have
a
huge
concern
with
the
insertion
of
you
guys
into
279
6855,
which
which
allows
you
to
go
in
and
do
the
increase,
improve
and
preserve
public
education
facilities.
C
That
was
a
hard
press
issue
for
me
when
the
city
of
las
vegas
asked
for
it,
but
they
had
done
pilot
schools
under
dr
hibbler
before
before
they
asked
for
it
and
even
when
they
asked
for
it.
I
still
had
some
super
concerns,
but
having
the
county
to
trigger
that
information,
not
trigger
that
information
but
trigger
that
provision
is
a
huge
problem.
For
me
number
one
is
not
your
role.
C
I
know
that
that
door
seemed
to
have
been
open
on
that
half
cent
sales
tax,
an
av-309,
but
even
that
half
cent
sales
tax
was
a
hard
press
vote
for
me
and
I
don't
see-
and
I'm
not
willing
to
open
the
door
for
like
a
county
having
that
level
of
local
control
over
buildings
or
public
education
facilities
where
clark
county
school
district.
It
has
that
role.
O
Absolutely
madam
chair,
through
you
to
senator
neil
sonic
coleman,
director
of
community
and
economic
development,
for
the
record.
Yes,
we've
inserted
ourselves
into
that,
because
we
were
trying
to
create
parity
and
we
didn't
want
clark
county
to
have
an
unfair
advantage
in
our
redevelopment
agency
that
the
cities
were
required
to
do
so.
The
18
set-aside
is
something
that
was
established
by
the
legislature.
O
It
wasn't
something
to
my
knowledge
that
was
requested
and
if
you
look
at
the
language,
as
it
reads
right
now,
clark
county
would
not
have
to
set
aside
any
money
to
do
any
of
those
community
benefits
right.
So
we
didn't,
we
didn't
think
it
was
fair
that
okay,
you
know,
city
of
henderson,
north
las
vegas
city
of
las
vegas,
has
to
set
aside
18
of
the
redevelopment
revenue
and
then
clark
county
did
not
have
to
do
the
same
thing,
and
so
that
is
the
reason
why
we
wrote
ourselves
into
that
bill.
O
If
you
look
at
redevelopment
law
279,
I
think
it's
685,
that
is
a
provision.
That's
specific
to
the
city
of
las
vegas.
Their
18
set
aside
is
split.
Nine
and
nine.
Nine
percent
goes
to
affordable
housing.
Nine
percent
goes
to
education,
they're
required
to
do
that
until
2030
or
2031..
O
All
of
the
other
redevelopment
agencies
of
a
size,
basically
in
southern
nevada,
are
required
to
do
18
set
aside
and
all
18
goes
to
education
as
the
bill
as
as
nrs
279
is
currently
written.
Clark
county
is
not
would
not
be
required.
So
if
you
have
a
concern
about
us
creating
that
parity
that
requirement,
we
can
have
that
conversation.
O
C
But
I
I
honestly
feel
like
this
needs
a
little
bit
more
time
and
it
needs
its
own
bill
to
come
back
and
have
a
full
discussion
about
all
of
the
implications,
putting
the
boundaries
in
the
record
that
are
envisioned
putting
the
revenues
in
the
record
that
will
be
affected.
C
C
There
was
a
whole
conversation
about
public
safety
and
health
care,
and
so
you
know
I
I
really
I
really
want
to
understand
and
have
a
little
bit
more
data
associated
with
this
amendment
and
this
proposal.
I
see
that
the
door
was,
you
guys,
saw
the
door
open,
but
I'm
not
so
sure
about
it.
But
madam
chair
I'll
leave
it
there
and
let
the
committee
ask
questions.
E
Thanks,
so
I
have
to
admit,
I
feel
like
I'm
butting
in
where
I
don't
belong
is
the
clark
county
issue,
but
I
will
say
just
reading
the
bill.
The
developer
will
and
hiring
well.
First
of
all,
you
want
all
subcontractors
in
100
miles.
I
understand
the
goal
here
is
try
to
get
as
many
people
in
the
local
area.
The
redevelopment
employed.
The
problem
you
run
into
from
a
contractor
perspective.
E
The
developer
will
in
hiring
for
construction
jobs
for
the
project,
uses
best
efforts
to
hire
veterans
and
persons
of
sexes
and
diverse
ethnicities
living
within
the
redevelopment
area.
The
the
problem
is
okay,
these
are
going
to
typically
be
prevailing.
Wage
projects.
You've
got
to
have
a
certain
number
of
people
that
are
journeyman
grade
craftsmen,
perhaps
women,
craft
persons
or
whatever
it
is.
You
gotta
have
a
certain
number
that
are
in
official
union
general
union
sponsored
apprenticeship
programs.
E
I
I
don't
see,
plus
I
think
senator
neil
hit
it
out
of
the
park
on
that
on
you.
Look
I've
been
watching
redevelopment
projects,
my
whole
adult
life,
I
remember
1977
sparks
started
one
trying
to
save
the
nugget
and
downtown
sparks
and
ended
up
going
on
for
30
years
and
never
worked
cost
millions
of
dollars
and,
more
importantly,
it
siphoned
money
away
from
other
legitimate
government
services
that
were
needed.
M
M
For
22
years
I
have
seen
most
recently
a
50
million
dollar
tax
credit
go
to
the
pre,
the
building
of
an
event
center
onto
the
world
market
center,
which
was
partly
funded
by
redevelopment
dollars,
which
is
adjacent
to
the
chelsea
back
in
the
day
it
was
called
chelsea
outlet
that
was
also
sponsored
by
redevelopment
dollars,
and
then
there
is
the
hotel
downtown
on
main
street
main
street
station,
which
used
millions
of
dollars
in
redevelopment
funds,
and
I'm
sure
I
could
probably
guess
pretty
closely
that
the
circa
that
just
went
up
got
some
benefit
from
the
redevelopment
department,
as
well
as
the
mob
museum
and
the
smith
center.
M
All
these
are
in
a
redevelopment
area
that
I
can
ride
my
bike
to
from
my
home,
which
is
in
an
area
that
has
seen
blight
exacerbated
in
the
last
20
years,
because
of
disinvestment
people
move
out,
houses
are
derelict.
We
have
empty
lots
at
some
point
whether
it
can
pencil
out
all
the
way
or
we
can
put
a
spreadsheet
together
and
make
it
all
make
sense.
M
M
We
have
to
say
yes,
this
is
difficult,
but
we
are
going
to
work
with
the
redevelopment
agency
with
the
agencies
that
are
state
funded
and
that
do
this
type
of
work
for
job
training
and
figure
out
how
we
can
work
with
the
unions
and
work
with
all
these
folks
to
get
somebody
trained
and
employed,
so
that
they're
not
now
using
government
funds
and
then
from
another
department,
hhs
or
whomever,
to
survive
when
they
could
have
been
learning
a
skill
to
help
them
move
on
out
of
poverty.
So
that's
how
I
feel
about
it.
E
Well,
I
understand,
and
I
frank
frankly
respect
the
your
whole
efforts.
I'm
just
saying
like
to
say
when
you
get
in
the
weeds,
it
gets
a
lot
more
complicated
and
I
I
know
for
a
fact
that
senator
neil
has
been
watching
these
kind
of
things.
I
said
her
father
before
her,
so
you
know
it's
not
like
people
haven't
thought
some
of
this
through
and
it's
not
quite
as
simple,
as
you
know,
just
saying.
E
Well
we're
going
to
put
in
this
area
and
we're
going
to
make
sure
everybody
in
that
area
gets
employed
because
there
may
not
be
in
that
neighborhood.
The
type
of
people
can
even
do
that.
Have
the
skills
to
do
the
work
that's
required
so
anyway,
I
don't
want
to
belabor
the
point.
I
understand
and
I
wish
you
the
best
I
am
out
of
my
league
because
I
live
in
sparks
and
so
what
happens
in
vegas
stays
in
vegas
right.
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
M
A
Thank
you
very
much
additional
questions,
senator
gokuchi
questions,
so
I
just
mine's
pretty
surface,
and
that
is
when
you
talk
about
the
hundred
thousand,
for
example,
that
the
school
will
get
or
keep
with
the
with
the
hold
harmless.
Where
is
where's
the
funding
gonna
come
from?
If
I,
if
I'm
a
school
district
or
a
school,
and
I'm
keeping
that
hundred
thousand
where's
the
excess
money
come
from
that
the
other
the
builder
will
get.
M
A
N
Madam
chair
joanna
jacob
from
clark
county,
I
believe
what
you're
referring
to
madam
chair
is
the
funding
that
is
generated
in
the
district
and
when
and
I'm
going
to
try
and
do
this
and
director
coleman
can
correct
me
or.
O
Absolutely
for
the
record:
johnny
coleman,
director
of
community
economic,
economic
development.
So,
madam
chair,
the
way
redevelopment
formalized
redevelopment
works
at
the
state
of
nevada
is
there
is
a
base.
So
when
a
community
establishes
a
redevelopment
area
or
agency,
there
is
a
base
that
is
set,
and
so
that
is
the
hold
harmless
piece.
O
So,
for
instance,
like
I
mentioned
clark
county
school
district,
they
were
to
get
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
that
was
their
base
every
all
of
that
remains
the
same,
but
the
purpose
of
redevelopment
and
the
goal
is
to
increase
values
in
those
areas.
So
what
happens
is
all
of
the
taxing
agencies
that
contribute
to
a
redevelopment
agency
are
held
harmless,
which
means
that
the
base
is
set?
Everybody
gets
the
base.
O
The
work
that
the
redevelopment
agency
does
to
improve
the
neighborhood
and
improve
value
is
called
the
tax
increment.
That
tax
increment
is
what
goes
into
what
we
call
the
redevelopment
fund,
and
that
is
the
money
that
continues
to
be
recycled
through
the
redevelopment
agency
and
that's
how
the
agency
gets
money.
So,
for
instance,
you
set
you
set
up
a
redevelopment
agency
and
the
base
is
set
at
500.
O
through
the
work
that
the
agency
does
now.
The
property
value
is
no
longer
500,
but
now
that
property
value
is
2
000.,
so
that
increment
that
difference
that
1500
difference.
That
is
the
funding
that
goes
back
into
the
agency,
and
that
is
continue
to
be
recycled
through
the
agency
to
support
redevelopment
throughout
that
particular
redevelopment
area.
The
school
district
continues
to
get
their
base
or
the
who
all
of
the
agencies
they
continue
to
get
that
500
that
was
established
at
the
base.
O
So
it's
only
the
increment
that
we're
talking
about,
and
the
goal
is
like.
I
said
if
the
redevelopment
agency
is
doing
what
it
is,
what
it
was
intended
to
do.
Those
valuations
within
those
neighborhoods
goes
up.
The
increment
goes
up
after
30
years,
because
currently,
an
nrs
redevelopment
plan
only
lasts
for
30
years.
All
of
that
increment,
all
of
that
value
goes
back
to
all
of
those
taxing
agencies
that
are
part
of
the
redevelopment
agency.
The
taxing
agencies
that
clark
county
uses
are
the
same.
O
Taxing
agencies
that
are
used
by
the
city
of
las
vegas,
the
city
of
henderson,
the
city
of
north
las
vegas,
so
there's
no
differentiation
there
nrs
is
those
things
are
set
by
statute,
so
it
wouldn't
be
like
clark.
County's
taxing
districts
are
different
and
we're
taking
out
a
different
amount
than
what
is
allotted
or
something
different,
that
the
city
of
henderson
or
north
las
vegas
or
city
of
las
vegas.
O
Does
those
things
are
set
in
place
and
so
that
that
standard,
the
way
that
money
and
that
that
that
tax
increment
is
something
that's
standard
across
all
redevelopment
agencies
in
southern
nevada.
A
N
Ahead
did
you,
madam
chair.
I
was
just
going
to
point
out
that
that's
what
just
to
clarify
it
for
director
coleman,
the
increment
is
the
funding.
Then
that's
the
18
set
aside
that
senator
neil
no,
the.
O
Revenue,
so
that's
the
the
revenue
so
just
again,
shawnee
coleman,
so
the
18
set
aside,
is
a
portion
of
the
redevelopment
fund.
So
it's
a
portion
of
that
increment,
and
so
I
will
so
just
to
you
know,
give
some
clarity
if
the
increment,
like
I
said,
was
fifteen
hundred
dollars,
and
that
is
what
is
flowing.
That's
the
revenue,
that's
flowing
into
the
redevelopment
fund,
18
of
that
1500.
O
That
is
the
portion
that
is
set
aside
for
either
education
or
for
the
city
of
las
vegas,
affordable,
housing
and
education.
So
that
is
what
the
18
set-aside
is.
That
is
money
that
is
taken
out
of
their
general
or
their
annual
revenue
that
they
can
only
use
for
that
specific
purpose.
So
the
the
the
tax
increment
and
the
18
set-aside
are
two
different
things.
A
Thank
you.
Yes,
senator
neil
go
ahead
thanks.
C
So
so
can
you
put
on
the
record
what
is
the
current
base?
So
if
you're,
if
you're
taking
it
back
to
2002,
then
what's
the
current
base
that
you
guys
are
going
to
be
playing
off
of
because
that
matters,
because
any
new
development
that
comes
in
you're
going
to
get
that
excess,
so
the
base
from
2002
is
excessively
low.
So
what's
the
number.
O
For
the
record
shawnee
coleman,
director
of
community
and
economic
development
for
clark
county,
madam
chair,
for
you
to
senator
neil,
I
don't
have
a
number
for
the
base.
What
I
can
tell
you
is
is
we
have
done
estimates
based
on
our
existing
redevelopment
agency
and
the
three
areas
that
are
currently
contained
in
there,
and
the
annual
revenue
based
on
using
all
of
those
numbers
is
roughly
7.6
to
7.7
million
dollars.
C
Okay
and
then,
if
you
have,
and
so
you've
also
done
estimate
if
you
go
in
there
and
redevelopment
and
you
re
redevelop
in
that
area
and
you
have
a
new
development,
so
the
new
development
will
then
give
you
some
excess.
So
what
what
are
your
estimates
because
you
have
to
be-
somebody
has
to
be
envisioning
a
project
or
something
that
they're
thinking
about
so
doing
an
applied
analysis.
He
did
some
hypotheticals
for
you.
C
O
For
the
record,
shawnee
coleman,
director
of
community
and
economic
development
for
clark
county,
madam
chair,
through
you
senator
neil,
we
do
not
have
any
estimates
we.
That
was
not
the
purpose
of
the
study.
The
study
was
just
to
determine
whether
or
not
there
were
areas
in
clark
county
that
could
benefit
from
the
redevelopment
law
and
then
also
identify
potentially
those
evaluation
areas.
We
have
not
identified
specific
projects.
O
As
ms
jacobs
have
noted,
this
has
been
a
slow
process
for
us.
The
redevelopment
study
was
something
that
was
requested
by
the
board
of
county
commissioners.
Back
in
the
summer
of
19.,
I
was
hired
in
november
of
2019
and
I
was
able
to
provide
some
some
of
my
knowledge
from
my
previous
work
experience,
and
so
under
that
I
was
able
to
show
them
that
hey,
you
already
have
an
agency
and
you
have
the
ability
to
turn
it
back
on,
but
because
this
has
been
a
long
discussion
and
a
thoughtful
discussion
there
has
been.
O
C
C
I
support
the
original
version
of
the
bill
that
miss
assemblywoman
armstrong
had,
but
the
amendment
I
don't
know,
but
I
really
feel
like
it's
coming
with
this
level
of
an
amendment
and
that's
a
big,
that's
a
big
conversation
that
you
know
at
least
providing
that
study
number
one
of
providing
what
applied
analysis
had
to
say
so
there
can
at
least
be
some
some
depth
and
conversation
from
the
committee
to
understand
the
the
decision
that
would
be
made
to
let
to
walk.
C
Allow
you
guys
to
go
back
into
279,
it's
a
big
deal
and
I'm
still
not
clear
on,
like
which
particular
areas
that
you
guys
really
really
develop,
and
I
feel
like
you
need
you
need
to
go
in.
You
need
to
prove
that
those
areas
have
blight
and
then
you
need
to
come
back.
You
need
to
say,
okay,
we
know
we
have
blight.
We
know
that
these
areas
have
not.
You
know,
still
need
significant
growth
within
clark
county.
O
Madam
chair,
through
you,
shawnee
coleman,
director
of
community
and
economic
development,
senator
neil-
I
I
understand
your
concern.
I
guess
I
just
want
to
clarify.
You
know
a
few
things.
Clark
county
is
not
asking
whether
or
not
we
can
turn
our
redevelopment
agency
back
on.
We
already
have.
The
law
already
allows
us
to
do
that,
and
so
what
clark
county
is
asking
for
is
to
be
written
into
the
same
provisions
that
a
city
has
right
now
a
city
can
extend
the
life
of
their
agency.
O
Clark
county
can
turn
their
agency
back
on
if
the
board,
that
was
a
choice
that
they
made
but
based
on
the
way
the
law
is
written
and
the
plan
only
be
available
for
30
years.
If
the
board
were
to
so
choose.
You
know
in
the
next
couple
of
weeks
to
pass
that
resolution.
Our
redevelopment
agency
only
has
12
years,
so
we
don't
have
the
same
ability
that
a
city
would
have
to
extend
the
life
of
the
agency.
That
is
what
we're
asking
for.
O
We
think
it's
fair,
that
if
the
cities
have
the
ability
to
do
that,
that
the
county
should
also
have
the
ability
to
do
that,
I
mean
so
I
I
you
know
I
I
just
want
to
be
clear:
we're
not
asking
for
anything
above
and
beyond
different
than
what
the
law
currently
provides.
The
jurisdictions
that
already
have
redevelopment
agencies.
C
L
N
The
record
I
I
was
going
to
say,
senator
neil
you,
madam
chair,
to
senator
neil,
I
would
I
would
not
I
do
not
feel
beat
up
on.
We
did
have
a
conversation
before
this
and
these
are
good
questions.
I
respect
your
opinion
a
lot.
We
respect
your
opinion
a
lot
and
I
will
you
have
asked
us
for
the
feasibility
study.
N
I
heard
that
several
times
when
you,
if
that
you
mentioned
that
several
times,
so
I
wanted
to
say
for
the
committee
for
the
purposes
of
the
committee,
we
will
provide
that
to
the
committee
and
you
can
take
a
look
at
the
work
that
we
have
done
so
far
and
I
can
provide
that
immediately
following
the
hearing.
A
G
Thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
committee
for
the
record
kelly
crompton
representing
the
city
of
las
vegas.
The
city
of
las
vegas
is
in
support
of
the
bill.
While
this
isn't
a
bill
that
we
asked
the
assemblywoman
to
bring,
we
did
have
many
conversations
with
her
on
the
other
side
of
the
house
and
talked
her
through
our
redevelopment
agency
and
the
projects
that
we
have
done
and
are
supportive
of
the
measure
to
address
senator
hansen's
concerns.
We
do
share
some
of
those
concerns
as
well.
G
However,
part
of
ward
5's
100
plan
in
action,
which
is
one
of
councilman
careers
priorities,
does
include
workforce
development
and
on-the-job
training,
and
so
we're
hopeful
that,
with
his
priorities
in
the
workforce,
development
area
and
the
provisions
in
this
bill,
we
can
address
some
of
those
concerns.
We
do
work
very
closely
with
the
snack
committee.
We're
hopeful
that,
as
we
navigate
through
this
new
bill,
where
there
are
smaller
projects,
maybe
we're
giving
a
ten
thousand
dollar
incentive
a
hundred
thousand
dollar
incentive
and
not
the
30
million
dollar
incentives.
G
We
can
work
with
the
snack
committee.
We
can
work
with
the
state
to
say
we
tried,
we
put
it
out
there,
we
put
it
in
the
workforce.
Development
area,
we
put
it
out
in
ward,
5,
show
the
work
that
our
development
is
doing
and
move
on.
If
we
can't
find
the
people
within
that
area,
which
is
what
we
currently
do,
we
do
provide
reporting
to
the
state.
G
Our
economic
development
department
does
require
that
we
send
reports,
I
believe,
to
lcb
on
the
rda,
and
so
this
is
just
another
one
of
those
provisions
that
we
would
continue
to
report
that
just
to
a
couple
of
other
agencies,
so
we
are
supportive.
We
thank
the
assembly
woman
for
bringing
us
into
the
conversation
and
again
we
have
ryan
smith
to
answer
any
questions.
Should
you
need
that?
Thank
you.
A
Okay,
thank
you
very
much.
I
am
going
to
go
to
support
opposition
and
neutral
we're
we're
short
on
time
on
deadline
and
we're
short
on
time
today,
because
we
have
finance.
So
if
you
don't
mind
we'll
do
that
right
now:
okay,
I
don't
see
anybody
in
the
room,
and
so
I
will
go
to
broadcasting,
and
would
you
please
see
if
there's
anybody
in
support.
K
K
A
Thank
you
very
much
any
closing
comments.
M
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
thank
you
committee
for
staying
late
and
hearing
this.
Obviously
we
have
a
situation
with
the
amendment,
and
so
I
think,
clark,
county
and
senator
neil
and
I
need
to
have
a
conversation
and
I
will
get
back
with
you.
M
I
think
the
original
bill
in
its
first
form
is
is
is
allowable
and
I
think
that
there's
there
could
be
support
for
that
and
we'll
figure
out
tonight
about
the
other,
because
I
know
we're
close
on
deadline
and
we'll
get
back
with
you
one
way
or
another
as
soon
as
possible.
A
Thank
you
so
much
assemblywoman,
and
we
appreciate
your
time
and
and
yours,
miss
crompton
and
miss
jacobs
and,
of
course,
miss
coleman
for
all
your
expertise
as
well.
Mr
smith,
thank
you
for
being
here
hope
to
see
in
the
building.
Sometimes.
F
A
You
did
next
time
we
won't.
Let
you
all
right
with
that.
I
will
close
the
hearing
on
assembly
bill
335
and
we'll
look
forward
to
hearing
if
there's
any
resolution.
So
thank
you
very
much
and
with
that
we
have
one
more
thing
on
the
agenda.
We
have
public
comment
so
broadcasting
when
you're
ready.
K
K
A
All
righty
well,
thank
you
very
much
then,
with
that
committee
members
and
senator
neil
as
well
on
zoom,
we
will
call
it
a
day
and
we'll
adjourn
our
meeting
and
we'll
meet
again,
if
not
before,
for
sure
on
friday,
at
3
30..
Thank
you.