►
Description
For agenda and additional meeting information: https://www.leg.state.nv.us/App/Calendar/A/
Videos of archived meetings are made available as a courtesy of the Nevada Legislature.
The videos are part of an ongoing effort to keep the public informed of and involved in the legislative process.
All videos are intended for personal use and are not intended for use in commercial ventures or political campaigns.
Closed Captioning is Auto-Generated and is not an official representation of what is being spoken.
A
D
A
Here,
thank
you
so
much.
There
are
four
members
present
and
we
have
a
quorum,
we'll
go
ahead
and
mark
senator
hammond
present
as
he
arrives,
and,
of
course,
as
usual,
I'll
give
you
the
verbal
confirmation
that
he's
joined
the
zoom.
A
Our
usual
reminders
please
be
courteous
and
respectful
with
each
other
during
the
meeting.
Even
if
you
disagree
with
another
person's
position
for
those
participating
on
zoom
be
sure
to
go
ahead
and
mic
your
mute,
your
microphone
when
you're,
not
speaking,
all
right,
I'm
going
to
take
us
a
little
bit
out
of
order.
First,
we
are
going
to
hear
sp
60
from
the
dmv
revises
provisions
related
to
governing
vehicles.
A
E
All
right,
thank
you
so
good
afternoon,
chair
harris
and
committee
members
sean
sever
from
the
dmv.
It's
so
nice
to
see
you
all
again.
It's
been
a
very
long
time.
Thank
you
for
letting
us
present
sp
60
to
you
today.
E
This
is
a
housekeeping
bill
for
the
dmv,
mainly
on
license
plates
and
several
other
things.
We
we
think,
can
improve
our
processes,
so
the
dmv
automatically
issues
license
plates
to
all
nevada
drivers
every
eight
years,
and
this
bill
would
make
it
an
option
for
people
to
get
new
plates
on
their
request,
which
would
save
the
dmv
a
lot
of
time
and
money.
E
The
second
item
is
special
plates
recommended
or
approved
in
prior
sessions.
Didn't
always
have
consistent
guidelines
for
design
development
specifications
and
status
changes,
so
this
bill
would
provide
consistency
for
all
of
those
proposed
special
license
plates
and
then
number
three.
The
the
dmv
works
with
government
agencies
that
need
license
plates
that
are
similar
to
general
issue
plates
for
safety
and
security
purposes.
E
This
bill
would
clarify
that
plates
issued
to
specific
agency
vehicles
are
not
transferable
and
not
subject
to
reissue
requirements,
and
then
number
four
vehicles
purchased
from
someone
other
than
a
dealer
must
must
purchase
a
temporary
permit
from
the
dmv
to
move
the
vehicle.
E
It
included
language
that
increased
the
complexity
of
the
distribution
of
these
funds
by
including
plate
and
renewal
fees,
and
this
bill
would
reverse
those
changes
made
in
ab63
and
the
dmv
will
work
with
the
lcb
to
adopt
regulations
to
ensure
proper
accounting
and
distribution
of
these
funds.
So
it's
a
housekeeping
bill.
E
A
All
right,
thank
you
so
much.
I
have
a
question
about
the
license
plate
reissuance.
F
Yes,
so
as
a
customer,
you
could
elect
at
any
time
to
have
that
plate
reissued
as
well
as
if
law
enforcement
makes
that
request.
We
would
go
ahead
and
reissue
that
plate.
F
Thank
you
for
the
question
chair
harris
april
sanborn
for
the
record
from
the
department
of
motor
vehicles.
No,
if
I'm
understanding
correctly
you're
asking
if
we
could
set
it
up
to
where
it
would
just
automatically
resend
it
eight
years.
Yes,
so
no!
That's
not
the
process
that
we're
looking
to
incorporate
here.
A
Okay,
great,
while
we're
working
on
that
do
any
other
committee
members
have
any
questions
they'd
like
to
ask.
D
Thank
you
mentor.
My
question
is
just
one
of
decision,
not
so
much
of
the
policy
I
like
the
bill,
but
it
we're
putting
an
awful
lot
of
detail
in
statute,
and
I
know
in
other
areas
of
of
the
statutory
schemes.
D
As
we
deal
with
these
things,
we
try
to
remove
things
from
the
statute
that
might
need
revision
and
we
drop
it
into
regulations.
Is
there
a
reason
why
we
put
so
much
detail
in
the
statute
and
not
merely
left
it
for.
F
Thank
you
for
the
question
april
sanborn
department
of
motor
vehicles.
We
are
researching
that
information.
Give
me
okay.
So,
first
of
all
I
let
me
apologize.
I'm
a
brand
new
administrator
here
and
I've
got
a
whole
team
of
experts
in
here
that
are
analyzing
that
information
as
we
speak,
so
we're
getting
that
information
together
for
you
right
now.
D
That's
fine,
and-
and
it's
just
that
when
we
put
it
in
statute,
if
we
find
out
that
there's
an
unintended
consequence,
it
means
we
have
to
wait
two
years
to
fix
it.
If
it's
in
regulation,
you
can
bring
an
emergency
statute
or
emergency
regulation
if
it's
important
enough
and
change
it
right
away,
so
I'm
trying
to
suggest
that
you
would
get
more
flexibility
if
you
drop
these
specifics
into
regulation
again,
I'm
not
opposed
to
it.
F
Thank
you
for
that
additional
information
april
sanborn
department
of
motor
vehicles
for
the
record,
and-
and
I
agree
with
you-
understanding
that
we
typically
try
to
keep
broad
language
and
statute
and
further
expanding
regulations
for
that
very
purpose,
and
I
was
not
part
of
drafting
this
bill
to
have
the
entirety
of
the
reason.
So
I'm
hoping
that
terry
is
able
to
provide
additional
information.
But
I
would
imagine
that
my
the
first
guess
in
that
would
be
that
we
just
need
something
a
little
bit
more
substantial
in
the
language.
F
G
Thank
you,
chair
harris.
If
I
made
jd
decker
for
the
record
dmv
compliance
enforcement
division,
some
of
this
bill
overlaps
into
some
of
the
things
that
my
division
does,
and
I
guess
in
answer
to
senator
pinkert's
question
the
this
bill
seeks
to
revise
items
that
were
previously
in
statute.
G
G
I
think
terry
might
agree
with
me
and
she
can
chime
in
if
she
wants
to.
Thank
you.
A
All
right
I'll
invite
you
all
to
follow
up
with
senator
pickard
via
email.
If
there
are
more
substantive
answers
to
his
questions.
Vice
chair
brooks.
C
Thank
you,
chair
harris,
a
question
regarding
section
18
of
the
bill
on
the
classic
vehicle
piece.
First
of
all,
how
many
vehicles
are
are
getting
this
classic
vehicle
exemption
from
emissions.
G
Testing
jd
decker
for
the
record
dmv
compliance
enforcement
division
chairs
through
you,
as
to
vice
chair,
brooks
our
records
currently
show
23
786
active
registrations
in
clark
and
washoe
county.
We
within
the
last.
We
also
show,
if
you
add
in
the
expireds
vehicles
plates
that
have
expired
over
the
last
18
months
months,
which
we
anticipate
many
of
those
could
renew
and
maybe
didn't
renew
because
of
covet
or
for
other
reasons.
The
number
is
thirty.
G
Three
thousand
five
hundred
and
sixty
three
total
active
and
it's
and
expired
within
the
last
18
months.
C
On
the
same
section,
please,
and
so
in
section
18,
a
little
confused
by
what
we're
doing
on
the
fees
sounds
like
it
was
just
kind
of
unworkable,
and
so
we're
changing
the
way
that
we're
doing
that
on
on
that
same
section
talked
about
really
kind
of
undoing
what
was
set
forth
in
assembly
bill
63
from
last
session.
Could
you
just
kind
of
like
briefly
explain
like
what
it
is
that
we're?
What
we're
changing.
G
Jd
decker
for
the
record,
unless
april
would
like
to
take
it
dmv
compliance
enforcement
division.
So
in
in
2019
we
changed
some
language
to
try
and
clarify
how
the
those
funds
were
distributed,
and
we
we
were
notified
by
lcb
that
there
was
some
confusion
in
some
of
the
wording
that
was
unintended
and
so
that
took
away
from
the
original
intent
of
the
statute,
so
that
this
is
a
bill
to
try
and
bring
that
language
back
to
clarity-
and
I
see
angela
there,
angela.
G
B
Thank
you,
angela
smith,
for
the
record
department
of
motor
vehicles.
So
what
we
found
out
with
the
the
language
is
it
added
in
fees
that
we
normally
wouldn't
calculate?
A
A
H
H
I
I
482-3955,
just
to
provide
a
little
context
to
the
to
the
committee
I
had
reached
out
to
the
department
on
looking
at
making
this
change
in
statute
as
part
of
one
of
their
bills,
and
I
was
about,
I
think,
if
memory
serves
me
correct
and
mr
several
that
could
clarify,
I
think
it
was
about
a
week
after
it
had
been
submitted
to
the
to
the
administration,
and
so
that
is
why,
in
fact,
you
see
it
as
an
amendment
not
as
part
of
of
the
overall
bill.
I
What
the
amendment
contemplates
is
expanding
the
time
period
with
respect
to
a
temporary
out-of-state
move,
permit
those
vehicles
that
are
sold
by
dealers
to
out-of-state
customers
at
the
present
time.
It
is
15
days
and
we
are
seeking
to
expand
that
by
30..
The
reason
is
is
twofold:
our
dealer
members
here
in
nevada
are
seeing
more
and
more
deals
by
out-of-state
customers
and
additionally,
due
to
the
production
interruptions
caused
by
kovitt
and
then,
as
many
of
you
probably
have
read
recently
with
the
supply
of
microprocessors
and
semiconductor
chips,
it
is
grinding
in
many
respects.
I
Production
of
vehicles
to
a
halt,
and
so
what's
happening
is:
is
consumers
from
states
across
the
land
know
precisely
what
they
want
and
oftentimes
the
vehicle
that
they
want?
Maybe
maybe
for
a
dealer
in
nevada
or
another
state,
and
what
happens
is,
is
the
15
days
simply
isn't
enough?
Historically,
the
practice
was.
We
would
issue
generally
two
of
these
at
one
time
and
then
at
which
point
and
rightfully
so
the
department
kind
of
said
well
that
defeats
the
purpose
of
of
of
the
statute.
I
So
then
we
would
have
to
contact
the
customer
and
let
them
know
that
their
time
period
is
expected,
is
getting
close
to
expire
and
do
they
need
another
permit
and
then
coordinate
the
issuance.
So
the
thought
process
behind
that
is
to
just
expand
it
to
minimize
disruption
for
the
for
the
customers.
I
am
anecdotally
speaking.
I
talked
to
several
dealers
and
to
give
you
an
idea
anywhere
between
7
and
upwards
of
25
of
all
vehicles
sold.
This
is
new
and
used
to
out-of-state.
I
Buyers
takes
place
in
nevada,
so
I
think
that
kind
of
gives
you
context
in
terms
of
the
number
of
vehicles
that
are
being
sold,
that
this
would
hopefully
take
care
of.
Madam
chair,
I
appreciate
you
letting
me
address
the
committee
and
obviously,
if
anybody
has
any
questions
I'll
avail
myself
to
answer
them.
Thank
you
very.
I
H
J
This
is
raphael
arroyo,
r-a-f-a-e-l,
last
name
a-r-r-o-y-o.
I
am
here
on
behalf
of
the
registration
services
association
of
nevada
good
afternoon,
everyone
for
those
of
you
that
are
not
familiar
with
what
we
do.
We
are
independent
third-party
businesses
that
help
process
dmv
registration
transactions
for
customers
in
the
reno,
carson
and
las
vegas
metro
areas.
We
are
licensed
and
bonded
by
the
nevada
secretary
of
state's
office
as
document
repairs,
and
I
just
like
to
give
a
little
context
of
what
we
do
and
why
we
support
sb60
the
way
our
business
works.
J
Is
we
take
client
to
the
mv
paperwork?
We
organize.
It
basically
make
sure
everything's
ordered
for
the
is
in
order
for
the
bmv,
and
we
present
that
transactions
to
one
of
the
dmv
offices
in
the
metro
area
for
processing.
J
So
you
can
think
of
us
as
like
prep
cooks
in
a
busy
restaurant,
where
we
basically
prepare
all
the
ingredients
and
make
sure
they're
ready
to
go,
and
then
the
dmv
technicians
being
the
chef
they
process
the
transactions
and
give
us
a
finished
product
registration
license,
plates,
etc.
J
This
process
greatly
increases
the
speed
and
efficiency
that
these
transactions
are
done.
Since
they're
handed
over
back
to
back
you're,
not
waiting
for
people
to
you
know
disinfect
the
chairs
and
windows
and,
and
you
know,
get
papers
together
and
things
like
that
as
of
right
now,
the
dmv
is
stating
that
the
average
customer's
transaction
has
taken
about
15
minutes
under
the
current
covert
protocols
and
a
registration
service
business
can
process
about
three
or
four
transactions.
J
In
that
same
time
period
last
session,
this
committee
helped
pass
ab288
which
restored
access
to
some
dmv
windows
that
were
set
aside
for
registration
service
businesses.
In
the
past,
this
access
was
an
invaluable
asset.
Obviously,
during
this
culver
pandemic,
with
the
dmv
operating
at
50
capacity,
they
admit
that
they're
only
able
to
process,
on
average
about
700
customers
a
day
at
each
of
these
metro
offices.
Using
about
you
know,
25
plus
window,
depending
on
staffing
in
the
las
vegas
area.
J
We
estimate
that
registration
service
industry
is
processing
about
140
transactions
a
day
at
only
two
windows
at
each
office.
So
it's
the
same
output
in
two
windows
about
20
in
comparison
to
the
rest
of
the
office.
So
the
industry
wants
to
make
sure
that
our
elected
representatives
are
aware
that
this
is
an
asset.
That's
available
to
the
dmv
to
increase
efficiency
and
the
cost
to
the
state
is
zero
because
we're
just
using
the
employees
that
are
already
there.
J
The
demand
is,
is
really
high
for
these
services
right
now,
with
all
the
backlog
and
the
industry
would
have
no
problem
filling
up
another
window
with
transactions
daily,
maybe
on
a
temporary
basis,
at
least
until
this
backlog
that
we
have
built
up
is
caught
up.
And
you
know
the
only
way
to
get
this
backlog
caught
up
is
to
process
these
transactions
faster
and,
and
that's
what
we
do.
J
The
industry
is
in
support
of
sb60
because
it
helps
customers
who
bought
a
vehicle
private
party
to
move
that
vehicle
legally
for
three
days
without
an
official
moving
permit,
and
these
are
overwhelmingly
the
type
of
customers
that
we
provide
service
to
most
dealerships
are
able
to
process.
You
know
have
their
edrs
and
process
things
online,
but
people
that
buy
cars
on
the
streets,
just
don't
have
that
option,
and
it's
really
gives
them
an
opportunity
to
allow
them
to
take
the
vehicle
home.
Legally.
J
I've
had
customers
that
have
gotten
tickets
because
they
bought
the
car
and
were
just
driving
it
home
from
somebody's
house
and
got
a
ticket,
and
then
it
allows
them
to
get
an
admissions
test
or
even
you
know,
get
a
permit
or
get
the
paperwork
ready
to
get
a
registration.
So
we
really
think
that
this
is
a
great
idea,
and
I
would
welcome
any
questions
that
any
members
have
about
our
industry
and
how
we
can
help
or
or
anything
like
that,.
A
Actually,
we
have
a
question
for
you
from
senator
pickard.
D
Hey
madam
chair,
you
caught
my
attention
when
you
first
introduced
who
you
work
for.
I've
used
a
registration
service
in
the
past
and
it
sounds
like
your
organization
are
third
party
vendors
for
dmv.
We
just
heard
a
bill
or
two
on
driving
schools
and
salvaged
title
companies
that
are
working
as
third-party
partners.
I
believe
they
were
called
with.
Dmv
are:
is
your
organization
or
your
members,
working
with
dmv
to
help
reduce
the
backlog?
Are
you
partnering
with
dmb,
or
is
this
something
you're
just
jumping
in
to
do
yourselves.
J
Well,
unfortunately,
as
of
right
now
we're
not
necessarily
partnering
with
dmv,
we
are
processing
transactions
at
dmv
on
a
daily
basis,
but
the
dmv
has
not
reached
out
to
us
in
this
capacity.
In
the
same
way,
they've
reached
out
to
driving
schools
to
help
offload.
You
know
some
of
these
transactions
they
haven't
reached
out
to
us
in
that
capacity.
We've
reached
out
to
them,
but
we
have
not
gotten
back
a
response
right
now.
I
can
tell
you
that
the
registration
services
are
overwhelmed
with
business.
People
are
willing
to.
J
J
On
a
saturday
just
so
they
can
process
a
transaction
registration
service
companies,
they're
parking
out
every
every
night,
they're
camping
out
at
dmvs,
and
just
to
try
to
get
a
spot
at
one
of
these
windows
they're
so
overwhelmed
with
business.
I
mean
we
got
people
getting
there
to
line
up
at
2
30
in
the
morning.
J
You
know
11
p.m.
At
night,
just
to
get
a
spot.
So
we
have
the
business.
If
the
dmv
allowed
us
to
process
more
transactions,
we
could
do
it,
but
we
are
not
a
partner
in
the
way
that
they
have
been
promoting
driving
schools
or
these
salvage
title
people,
which
I
support.
I
support
both
of
those
things.
I
think
that's
a
great
idea,
but
we
can
definitely
help
we
just
haven't.
We
haven't
been
able
to
to
connect
there.
D
All
right,
well,
I
appreciate
that
I
don't
want
to
be
throwing
anybody
under
the
bus.
I
know
these
guys
are
swamped,
but
it
just
raised
the
question
in
my
mind,
because
I
just
had
an
employee
two
weeks
ago
have
to
take
half
a
day
off
to
go
register
his
car
and
I'm
thinking
anything
that
might
speed
up
the
process
and
get
the
backlog
done,
could
only
help
so
anyway.
That
was
the
nature
of
the
question.
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
H
H
A
I
believe
we
heard
from
the
nevada
franchise,
auto
dealers
association
who
have
a
friendly
amendment
and
it's
my
understanding
that
the
dmv
has
no
issues
with
their
suggestion
of
changing
it
from
15
to
30
days.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that.
F
A
F
And
madam
chair,
with
your
indulgence,
I'd
like
to
respond
to
your
question
and
senator
pickard's
question:
yes,
please,
okay,
so
april
sanborn
dmv
for
the
record.
So
with
response
to
your
question
in
regards
to
why
we
have
to
be
in
there
at
all
in
reference
to
the
the
reissuance
process.
F
So
essentially,
this
is
just
to
kind
of
firm
up
our
current
process.
The
way
that
we
are
going
to
go
about
issuing
this,
this
particular
plate
when
a
person
comes
in
and
requests
to
have
it
done,
but
we
don't
have
the
ability
for
law
enforcement
to
make
that
request.
We
don't
have
the
authority,
so
the
reason
why
we
added
this
into
b
was
to
add
law
enforcement
into
that
authority.
For
us.
A
F
Go
ahead
and
reach
out
to
you
and
have
further
conversations
about
how
we
we
can
look
into
that
okay
and
so
then,
in
response
to
senator
pickard's
question,
I
just
lost
my
train
of
thought
regarding
so.
C
D
With
the
putting
so
much
detail
in
here,
instead
of
doing
it
in
regulation,.
F
Yes,
thank
you
april
sanborn
department
of
motor
the
vehicles,
and
I
just
really
appreciate
your
guys's
indulgence
with
me
today.
So
yes,
what
I
had
mentioned
before
is
correct
in
our
our
dealings
with
creating
other
plate
designs
and
producing
these
plates.
F
We've
run
into
some
issues
when,
when
we
mention
there
are
certain
things
that
have
to
be
done
a
certain
way,
we're
always
requested
to
provide
the
statutory
authority.
So
again,
we
felt
that
it
was
important
to
add
more
more
weight
behind
the
decisions
that
we
make
and
that's
why
it's
being
added
into
statute.
D
Right,
I
appreciate
that
and
I
don't
mean
to
overblow
this.
I
just
think
that
the
detail
about
having
180
days
in
order
to
talk
to
people
and
then
you
got
to
go
back
to
the
original,
requester
and
you're
doing
all
this
stuff.
Personally,
I
think
that
should
be
in
the
regs,
not
in
statute,
but
that's
just
a
hang
up.
I
guess
I
have
I
like
to
see
the
statutes
focused
on
enabling
language
and
then
let
you
guys
go
to
town
and
do
what
you
need
to
do
in
the
regs.
That
way
you
can
be
anyway.
A
H
J
K
D
K
As
the
primary
investigative
entity
or
upon
specific
requests
from
assorted,
public
agencies,
specifically
current
statutory
language,
enables
nevada's
sheriffs
chiefs
of
police
district
attorneys
and
the
attorney
general,
the
secretary
of
state
and
the
department
of
education
to
request
investigative
assistance
from
the
division.
The
division
routinely
receives
such
requests
and
provides
assistance.
K
Historically,
however,
the
division
has
received
requests
for
insistence
from
various
other
state
agencies
and
entities.
These
can
frequently
involve
threats
against
state
officials,
employees
or
facilities
fraudulent
transactions
involving
public
monies
or
conflicts
of
interest
for
the
requesting
agency
over
its
history
and
where
no
other
option
existed,
the
division
has
provided
these
agencies
with
assistance.
K
Additionally
statutes
that
delineate
the
responsibility
of
the
nevada
office
of
cyber
defense
coordination
require
the
investigation
division
to
coordinate
with
that
office
in
gathering
intelligence
and
initiating
investigations
of
cyber
threats
and
incidents.
The
proposed
changes
outlined
in
sb58
provide
clarification
as
to
the
division's
role
in
providing
investigative
assistance
and
who
can
request
such
assistance.
K
The
division
will
investigate
certain
technological
crimes
and
enforce
provisions
of
law
relating
to
technological
crimes,
and
the
division
will
provide
investigative
services
upon
request
to
certain
state
agencies
in
criminal
investigations
relating
to
cannabis.
The
changes
also
enable
the
director
of
public
safety
to
efficiently
use
available
department
resources.
K
H
Queue:
no
luck
there
either
chair.
It
appears
that
no
callers
wish
to
testify
in
opposition.
H
A
H
A
Okay.
Well.
That
concludes
our
public
comment.
Then,
are
there
any
comments
from
members
before
we
adjourn
our
meeting.