►
Description
For agenda and additional meeting information: https://www.leg.state.nv.us/App/Calendar/A/
Videos of archived meetings are made available as a courtesy of the Nevada Legislature.
The videos are part of an ongoing effort to keep the public informed of and involved in the legislative process.
All videos are intended for personal use and are not intended for use in commercial ventures or political campaigns.
Closed Captioning is Auto-Generated and is not an official representation of what is being spoken.
A
We'll
now
call
the
meeting
of
the
senate
committee
on
legislative
operations
and
elections
to
order
secretary.
Please
note
that
all
members
are
present
vice
chair
lang
just
stepped
away
for
a
second
to
go
retrieve
something
from
her
office
majority
leader
cannizzaro
will
be
arriving
a
little
late
today,
please
mark
her
present
when
she
arrives.
A
We've
gone
over
all
the
housekeeping
measures
before
so
I
just
remind
everybody
to
silence
their
cell
phones
and
when
you
do
speak,
please
state
your
name
spell
your
name
and
if
you're
representing
an
organization,
please
state
what
organization
you're
representing
we
will
take
public
comment
at
the
end
of
the
hearing.
We
will
now
open
the
hearing
on
senate
concurrent
resolution
11
and
we
are
very
lucky
to
have
scott
gillis
from
governor
syslax
office
here
to
present
senate
concurrent
resolution
11..
Thank
you
good
afternoon,
mr
gillis.
Thank.
B
You
thank
you
good
afternoon,
mr
chairman
and
members
of
the
committee,
it's
good
to
be
back
in
senate
legislative
operations
and
elections
where
one
time
ago,
mr
stewart
knows
I
spent
hours
and
hours
of
my
life
listening
to
elections,
issues
a
much
more
peaceful
time
in
my
life,
I
would
say
probably
but
anyhow
for
the
record.
My
name
is
scott
gillis.
B
I'm
the
senior
advisor
to
governor
sislak
and
I'm
here
today
to
present
senate
concurrent
resolution
11.
B
scr
11
will
create
a
joint
special
committee
of
the
legislature
for
the
purpose
of
conducting
hearings
and
a
full
analysis
of
the
idea
presented
by
the
governor
in
january
during
a
state
of
the
state
speech
to
create
unique
innovation
zones
in
nevada.
The
purpose
of
the
governor's
proposal
is,
you
know,
is,
was
and
is
to
diversify,
nevada's
economy
and
enhance
our
ability
to
track
new
and
innovative
technologies
to
the
state.
B
The
governor's
innovation
zone
proposal
would
create
a
broad
structure
structure
by
which
applicants
engage
in
the
development
of
innovative
technologies
could
apply
to
create
an
innovation
zone
after
meeting
strict
standards
and
requirements
laid
out
by
statute,
including
a
significant
investment
commitment.
No
tax
incentives,
abatements
or
public
investment
will
be
part
of
this
proposal.
B
B
We
understand
that
simply
could
not
happen
in
the
last
month
of
this
session.
After
working
with
leadership
on
the
proposal
laid
out
in
scr
11,
the
governor
felt
the
best
path
forward
to
appropriately
appropriately
work
on.
This
proposal
was
the
creation
of
an
interim
joint
special
committee,
which
is
exactly
what
scr
11
would
do
like
the
proposal
for
innovation
zones
itself.
The
method
of
creating
this
committee
is
also
unique
in
its
approach,
along
with
establishing
the
joint
special
committee
to
meet
the
interim.
The
resolution
also
does
the
following
things
in
terms
of
membership.
B
The
resolution
would
provide
the
appointment
of
at
least
six
members
to
the
committee
two
members
of
the
senate,
two
members
of
the
assembly
appointed
by
the
majority
leader
and
the
speaker
respectively,
and
one
member
from
the
assembly
and
one
member
from
the
senate
appointed
by
minority
leaders
in
terms
of
process.
The
committee
would
select
its
own
chair
and
may
start
meeting
before
the
end
of
this
session.
If
the
legislation
will
be
passed
and
signed
by
the
governor,
the
committee
would
be
required
to
at
least
meet
at
least
once
a
month
in
the
interim.
B
In
terms
of
the
topics
that
the
committee
would
address,
I
think,
first
and
foremost
want
to
make
clear
the
the
governor's
innovation
zones
proposal
that
bdr
is
still
being
worked
on.
The
the
the
hope
and
expectation
in
conversations
with
lcb
was
a
version
of
that
bill
would
be
completed
by
some
at
some
point
before
the
end
of
the
session.
B
It
is
not
the
intention
of
the
governor's
office
to
have
that
particular
bill
heard,
but
rather
and
hopefully
heard
within
the
context
of
the
interim
joint
special
committee,
so
that
that
joint
special
committee
would
have
a
at
least
you
know
draft
piece
of
legislation
to
work
off
of
through
that
committee
process.
B
As
proposed
and
again
any
other
topics
related
to
the
proposal
that
the
committee
members
feel
is
appropriate
to
review
and
that
joint
special
committee.
They
you
know,
we
we'd,
encourage
that.
You
know
the
more
review
and
analysis
the
better
from
our
perspective,
but
allowing
that
to
be
done
not
under
the
time
constraints
created
by
the
last
month
of
a
of
a
regular
legislative
session.
B
In
terms
of
the
timeline,
what
the
resolution
proposes
is
that
the
committee
will
operate
on
a
fairly
strict
timeline
to
complete
its
review
and
submit
its
recommendations
regarding
the
creation
of
the
innovation
zones
in
in
nevada
by
december
31st.
To
the
extent
practicable
practicable
as
the
language
in
the
in
the
the
resolution,
unfortunately
excuse
me,
let
me
go
back
at
that
point.
What
the
concurrent
resolution
proposes
is
that
the
the
recommendations
that
come
out
of
the
joint
special
committee
would
be
one
of
three
things.
B
No
further
action
is
is
believed
to
be
necessary
on
innovation
zones,
a
recommendation
to
submit
a
bill
draft,
which
the
concurrent
resolution
would
give
that
committee
its
own
bill
drafted
to
to
submit
a
profile
bill
for
the
2023
session
or
the
possibility
of
making
a
recommendation
to
bring
forward
the
measure
in
a
upcoming
special
session.
B
B
B
In
the
end,
the
governor's
intent
is,
and
his
hope
is-
that
stakeholders,
the
public
and,
of
course,
this
legislative
body
are
enthusiastic
about
this
opportunity,
not
skeptical
about
a
fast-track
bill
in
the
final
weeks
of
a
120-day
session.
Nevadans
deserve
that
the
governor
believes
that
the
special
joint
committee
joint
special
committee
excuse
me
is
the
right
solution
to
explore
this
opportunity.
B
A
Thank
you
very
much,
mr
gillis,
and
appreciate
all
your
hard
work
back
many
years
ago
when
I
was
over
at
the
assembly
committee
on
elections,
and
you
were
working
for
secretary
of
state
miller
and
all
the
great
work
you
did
there
and
thank
you
for
your
work
for
governor
cesar
and
michelle
white
and
everything
you
guys
have
done
to
lead
the
state
during
these
unprecedented
times
the
last
year
and
a
half
that
I
don't
think
any
any
governor
has
had
to
face.
So
thank
you
and
thank
you
to
governor
cislock.
Thank
you
chair.
C
Hi
there,
so
I
just
have
a
couple
of
questions,
because
we
aren't
here
today
to
debate
whether
we
want
or
don't
want
innovation
zones,
we're
only
here
to
debate
and
talk
about
the
committee
and
if
we
think
this
committee
is
the
right
way
to
go
and
if
we
like
the
components
of
the
committee
within
the
bill,
so
I'm
going
to
speak
to
that
a
little
bit.
C
Our
committee
and
assembly,
ledge
ops
are
going
to
be
involved
in
public
hearings.
Everything
that
goes
with
redistricting,
as
you
know,
is
a
pretty
lengthy
process
and
to
do
all
of
this,
and
I
think
to
do
a
really
good
job.
It
would
be
better.
It
would
serve
well
plus
everyone's
going
to
go
on
vacation
after
the
session,
and
you
know
you
know
what
I
mean.
So
I
think
it
would
better
serve
the
committee
to
have
the
results
by
the
end
of
the
first
quarter
in
2022.
C
So
I
I
guess
I'm
asking
you
to
consider
that
because
I
think
if
you
want
to
get
the
best
information,
it
shouldn't
be
rush
and
you
know
how
committees
go.
There
is
get
a
piece
of
information
that
leads
you
to
ask
something
else
and
so
on
and
so
on.
Plus
I
noticed
in
here
that
and
I'm
happy
to
see
this,
that
you're
having
stakeholder
meetings,
those
stakeholder
meetings
so
you're
having
one
meeting
a
month,
plus
you're,
sending
your
members
of
your
committee
out
to
do
stakeholder
meetings.
C
So
it's
very
complex-
and
I
think
you
know
you
have
a
relatively
small
committee.
So
it's
gonna-
I
don't
know
if
you're
seeing
the
whole
committee
after
those
meetings,
but
it
could
take
a
lot
of
time,
so
it
might
be
better
spread
out.
C
And
then
I
guess
I
have
a
question
about
the
support
that
you
would
get
from.
Are
you
going
to
have
staff
support
or
because
the
staff's
going
to
be
involved
in
all
the
special
sessions
and
everything?
So
what?
How
are
you
looking
to
get
the
support
for
the
committee
that
you
will
need
to
have.
A
A
D
Right,
thank
you,
mr
chair
members
of
the
committee
for
the
record,
michael
stewart,
lcb
research
division,
so
scr
11
is,
I
guess
what
I'd
maybe
characterize
as
what
we
call
I
don't
know.
I
call
it
sort
of
like
a
one
shot
interim
study,
type
of
scenario,
and
we,
if
this
were
to
pass
obviously
lcb,
would
very
likely
staff
it.
We
have
a
provisions
in,
I
think
it's
218
e205
that
require
lcb
staff
to
provide
services.
If
there's,
if
the
chair
of
that
committee
is
indeed
a
legislator.
D
So
if
this
is
something
that
the
legislature
processes,
we'd
obviously
provide
staff
for
it,
I
think
the
director
of
the
lcb
would
then
delegate
which
division
in
lcb
would
be
appropriate
and
oftentimes.
D
We,
you
know
collaborate
with
legal
division
and
research
and
fiscal
to
determine
who's
appropriate
for
lead
staff,
and
sometimes
we
have
you
know
joint
staffing
responsibilities
there
too.
So
if
it
passes
obviously
lcb
would
provide
whatever
whatever
you
guys
would
like
to
for
staffing
services.
C
If
I
could
absolutely
please
go
ahead
by
sure,
and
so
back
to
the
meetings,
public
meetings
you're
going
to
have
with
the
stakeholders,
how
do
you
see
that
working
because
I
know
ledge
ops
is
going
to
be
traveling
around
the
state,
doing
public
meetings
as
well,
and
so
how?
How
do
you
see
that
happening
and
are
you
going
to
only
are
you
going
to
limit
it
to
groups
that
are
just
in
this
area,
because
that
the
innovation
zone
will
be
close
to
here?
How
are
how
are
you
gonna?
C
Do
that,
and
will
it
be
open
like?
Would
you
zoom
it?
Would
you
televise
it?
Would
you
do
it
on
the
youtube?
I
guess
not
televised,
probably
but
the
youtube
channel.
I
mean.
How
are
you
going
to
involve
other
people,
because
I
think
it's
more
than
just
one
county
in
our
state?
It
affects
our
whole
state.
B
Thank
you
vice
chair,
I'll,
try
to
answer
the
question.
I
I
think,
first
and
foremost
I'll
note.
First
and
foremost,
I
will
note
that
this
general
law
it
there.
Yes,
there
is
a
obviously
a
project
which
everyone
has
read
about
in
story
county
that
would
be
taking
advantage
of
the
legislation,
but
it
would
be
general
law
legislation
that
could
be
taken
advantage
of
anywhere
throughout
the
state.
B
You
know
if
the
if
the
appropriate
financial
commitments
and
plans
were
in
place,
so
I'll
note
that
first
in
terms
of
how
the
committee
will
run
again,
we
from
the
governor's
office
perspective,
we
would
give
deference
to
the
committee
on
how
they'd
like
to
do
that,
what
their
bandwidth
is
in
terms
of
virtual
meetings,
in-person
meetings.
As
far
as
the
stakeholder
meetings
again
we'd
be
happy
to
suggest
ways
to
do
that
and
and
utilize
executive
branch
resources
to
help
move
that
along,
but
ultimately
it
would
be
the
legislature's.
B
You
know
you
know
joint
special
committee
to
be
run
as
the
as
the
legislature
feels
fit.
You
know
I
I
think
from
our
perspective,
you
know
as
much
in-person
hearings
that
can
happen
as
possible.
I
mean
you
know:
one
of
the
topics
on
here
is
water.
We
all
know
that's
going
to
be
a
big
issue
with
any
project,
any
innovation
zone
project,
let
alone
the
one
story
county.
So
our
hope
would
be.
You
know.
B
A
committee
meeting
could
happen
like
run
like
a
committee
meeting
like
this,
where
you
could
spend
two
three
four
hours
on
that
topic
and
make
sure
all
the
invested
stakeholders
are
heard.
You
know
issues
are
worked
through,
hopefully
coming
to
a
compromise
and
something
that
makes
sense.
Ultimately,
we
understand
that
probably
the
first
start
of
this
piece
of
legislation
is
is
not
going
to
be
what
the
final
piece
of
legislation
comes
out
as
so
we
would
want
that
deliberative
process.
B
Just
like
a
a
committee
hearing-
and
you
know
if,
if
the
stakeholder
public
meetings
were
helpful
again,
we
would
defer
to
the
legislature
on
how
to
properly
run
those
and
make
those
happen,
and-
and
I
and
I
understand
the
concerns
about
bandwidth
and
resources,
you
know
come
from
the
executive
branch
last
year.
We
we
absolutely
understand
the
difficulties
there.
B
E
Thanks
chair
orange
fault,
so
I
just
had
a
quick
question
for
staff.
I
know
that
we
typically
have
two
or
three
studies
during
an
interim.
I
I
I
don't
know
how
many
I
was
asking
about,
but
like
the
bandwidth
of
what's
typical,
because
I
know
we
also
do
a
lot
of
studies
under
interim
committees,
but
the
ones
that
are
just
full-blown
studies.
What
do
we
typically
have
available.
D
This
is
michael
stewart
again
for
the
record
so
typically
and
there's
no
hard
fast
rule
on
this.
It
has
varied
over
the
years.
D
Often,
what
happens
is
the
assembly
will
generally
pick
about
three
studies
and
the
senate
will
pick
three
studies
for
sort
of
sick
six,
total
studies
independent
of
our
ongoing
statutory
committees
such
as
you
know,
public
lands,
health
care,
education.
That
sort
of
thing
on
occasion,
though,
we
have
committees
that
I
think
would
fall
into
a
different
category
that
would
be
sort
of
sort
of
other
kind
of
special
committees
that
happen
every
now
and
then
redistricting
as
one
of
them.
That
last
time
didn't,
for
example,
fall
into
one
of
those
six.
D
It
was
kind
of
a
seventh
one,
so
this
could
certainly
fall
into
that
category,
but
it
really
is
up
to
the
legislature.
We
just
you
know.
If
we
get
too
many,
then
we
run
them
into
us
into
a
sort
of
a
budget
sort
of
staffing
issue,
but
generally
we're
able
to
accommodate
all
of
the
interim
or
all
of
the
statutory
ongoing
statutory
committees
and
a
roughly
six
or
so
what
I
call
one
shot
committee
such
as
this.
F
B
Protected,
thank
you
for
the
question
senator
bakken
very,
very
nice,
to
meet
you
in
person.
I
I
don't
have
an
answer
for
that
today.
It's
a
great
question.
It's
a
very
good
question.
We
don't
have
final
bill
language
yet
which
details
the
protections
that
would
occur
for
the
surrounding
local
governments
and
impacted
local
counties.
B
This
is
exactly
why
we
want
to
the
governor's
asking
this
to
be
moved
to
a
a
joint
special
committee
in
the
interim,
so
that
that
particular
topic
can
be
discussed
at
length
and
you
know
would
hopefully
be
a
multiple
hour
committee
hearing
on
just
that
topic,
as
opposed
to
one
or
two
questions.
You
know
in
a
in
a
very
you
know,
jammed
time
here
at
the
legislature,
but
it's
a
great
question
and
those
are
the
exact
kind
of
questions
we
hope
to
have
answered
within
that
special
committee.
B
Yes,
I
I
I,
if
I
understand
your
question
correctly
for
the
record
scott
gillis.
Sorry,
I'm
rusty
at
this
for
the
record
scott
gillis
in
terms
of
the
committee
membership
that
will
be
left
to
the
speaker
and
the
majority
leader
in
the
minority
leadership
to
identify
who
who
will
be
on
that?
That's
what
the
the
concurrent
resolution
proposes
in
terms
of
stakeholders.
We
hope
any
and
all
stakeholders
are
engaged
and
get
involved
in
the
discussion
and
and
come
to
the
committee
and
talk
about
their
concerns.
F
I
just
hope
that
you
know
if
this
can
go
on
the
record.
I
just
hope
that
it's
some
someone
that
is
impacted
directly
in
this
area.
So
often
our
southern
nevada,
constituent
legislators
come
up
and
do
things
to
northern
nevada.
So
I
want
to
make
sure
that
there
is
a
voice
in
this
committee
from
northern
nevada.
A
E
E
Actually,
it
doesn't
doesn't
really
speak
to
that.
It
talks
about
the
topics
and
it
does
not
talk
about
geographic
disbursement,
but
the
inputs
from
stakeholders,
including
without
limitation,
local
governments,
tribal
governments,
environmental
groups,
labor
economic
development,
water
authorities,
advanced
technology
industries
and
global
interests.
A
Certainly,
I
would
think
that
if
the
bill
passes
in
this
form
that
the
leadership
who
makes
those
appointments
would
want,
you
know
legislators
from
all
parts
of
the
state
to
to
serve
especially
from
areas
that
might
be
most
affected.
Any
additional
questions,
members
all
right,
not
seeing
any
additional
questions.
Thank
you
very
much
for
joining
us,
mr
gillis.
A
A
G
H
I
think
this
bill
represents,
or
this
issue
represents
the
biggest
opportunity
in
nevada
to
diversify
our
economy
and
probably
the
biggest
opportunity
to
put
people
nevadans
to
work,
and
we
believe
that
you
know,
after
the
questions
are
answered,
that
people
once
they
understand
and
all
the
questions
about
governance
and
impacts
on
other
other
governments
are
answered.
I
think
everyone
will
agree
that
this
is
a
great
opportunity
for
nevada
and
we
certainly
so
wholeheartedly
support
it.
Thank.
G
G
I
Good
afternoon,
chair
owen,
shaw
members
of
the
committee
for
the
record.
My
name
is
ken
evans.
Evans,
president
for
the
urban
chamber
of
commerce,
calling
to
support
senate
concur
revolution,
11
to
do
a
study,
a
focused
study
for
an
innovation
zone,
implementation
from
our
standpoint.
It
meets
two
priorities:
number
one:
diversify
and
expand
the
economy
and
number
two
make
sure
that
it's
done
in
a
manner
that
in
in
captures
diversity
and
inclusion,
both
in
terms
of
entrepreneurship
opportunities,
as
well
as
employment
opportunities.
I
So
to
that
end,
we
definitely
hope
that
you
supported
and
moved
forward
with
this,
and
what
we
would
also
hope
is,
regardless
of
the
specific
location
of
any
innovation
zone,
that
consideration
would
be
given
to
making
sure
that
there
are
either
employment
opportunities
or
entrepreneurship
opportunities
that
permit
people
that
may
not
currently
reside
in
the
immediate
area
to
come
and
participate
depending
on
what
the
opportunities
are.
So,
having
said
all
that
again
applaud
this
effort
and
encourage
your
support.
Thank
you
very
much.
G
G
G
Caller
we
can
hear
you
if
you
can
press
star
six
to
unmute
yourself.
You
may
begin
your.
A
G
H
Good
afternoon,
mr
chairman,
for
the
record
russ
james,
regional
director
of
the
district
council,
16
of
the
international
union
of
painters
and
allied
trades
nevada,
has
made
many
recent
games
and
working
towards
diversifying
our
economy.
We've
been
very
successful
in
getting
new
and
existing
tech
companies
to
relocate
to
northern
nevada.
H
H
G
H
I
think,
as
was
testified
a
little
bit
earlier
by
the
presenters
that
this
subject
and
topic
is
worthy
of
further
discussion.
More
than
we're
gonna
be
able
to
do
in
the
last
20
days
of
the
legislative
session,
and
I
think
this
is
the
right
direction
forward
for
transparency
and
to
fully
vet.
This
issue
we
are
in
support
of
the
innovations
ends
being
looked
at
in,
if
appropriate,
approved,
full
support
of
the
implications
of
the
jobs
and
the
economic
impacts
that
we
believe
will
be
positive
for
nevada
if
the
innovation
zones
are
approved.
G
H
H
We
believe
that
a
study
to
evaluate
innovation
zones
and
their
potential
impact
on
economic
and
workforce
development,
which
may
provide
insights
for
health
and
healthcare
workforce,
is
of
significant
importance
to
nevada.
As
we
look
at
ways
to
grow
our
economy,
we
urge
your
support
of
sdr
11..
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
participate.
G
J
Hi,
my
name
is
anthony
vasquezo
and
I'm
a
representative,
I'm
a
business
agent
for
local
16,
heat
and
frost
insulators,
and
that's
spelled
a
n
t,
h,
o
n
y
v,
I
s
and
we
would
just
like
to
stand
and
support
with
the
rest
of
the
building
trades.
We
believe
this
is
a
great
opportunity
and
we
would
like
to
see
it
progress.
Thank.
G
H
B-O-I-L-E-A-U,
I'm
the
deputy
political
director
of
the
operating
engineers,
local
three
we're
calling
today
in
support
of
senate
resolution
concurrent
resolution
11.
We
are
enthused
by
the
fact
that
it
specifically
mentions
labor
as
a
stakeholder
that
needs
consultation,
as
the
innovation
zones
are
studied
for
implementation
nevada.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
time.
G
I
I
Increase
jobs,
increase
the
workforce
and
for
those
reasons,
and
all
the
reasons
stated
by
the
previous
speakers
were
in
support
of
this
resolution.
Mr
chairman.
G
K
Thank
you
chairman
and
members
of
the
committee.
My
name
is
brittany,
kaiser
b-r-I-t-a-n-y
k-a-I-s-e-r,
I'm
the
chairman
of
griffin,
digital
mining
and
the
director
at
the
blockchain
center
foundation,
and
I'm
pleased
to
be
speaking
today
in
support
of
sdr11,
specifically
because
I
am
a
supporter
of
innovation
zones
and
new
ways
to
use
legislation
and
policy
in
order
to
promote
large-scale
economic
development.
K
So
I'm
very
excited
about
this,
particularly
in
nevada,
because
I
have
plenty
of
friends
and
colleagues
who
are
business
owners
and
private
landowners
in
the
state
of
nevada,
that
should
the
innovation
legislation
eventually
be
created
and
go
through
that
they
would
immediately
be
looking
to
create
jobs
and
develop
in
the
state
of
nevada
under
these
new
rules.
So
I'm
here
in
full
support
and
I'm
really
looking
forward
to
any
questions
from
the
committee
and
a
positive
reception
for
this
bill.
Thank
you.
G
J
Yes,
this
is
brock
pierce.
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
b,
r,
o
c
k
p.
I
e
r
c
e,
I'm
an
entrepreneur,
philanthropist
technologist,
venture
capitalist
and
I'm
a
patriot
that
cares
deeply
about
the
well-being
of
our
country
and
our
nation.
I'm
glad
that
the
technology
and
the
innovation
has
allowed
us
to
come
together
here,
I'm
speaking
to
you
from
puerto
rico.
J
I've
done
many
things
in
my
life,
one
of
which
is
digitizing
the
us
dollar
in
a
tether,
a
company
I
co-founded,
that's
doing
60
trillion
dollars
a
year
in
transactional
volume,
and
I
speak
to
members
of
our
congress
on
a
weekly
basis,
and
I
am
so
committed
to
innovation.
We
are
living
through
the
fourth
industrial
revolution
and
our
future
depends
on
us
supporting
innovation.
We
have
a
lot
of
problems.
J
G
L
Good
afternoon
rob
benner
r-o-b
b-e-n-n-e-r
with
the
northern
nevada
building
trades.
I'm
here
to
testify
in
support
of
scr
11.
northern
nevada
building
trades
has
signed
a
cooperative
development
and
labor
agreement
that
would
cover
the
entire
city
and
ensure
that
all
development
uses
highly
skilled,
good
pain,
local
union
labor
a
project
this
size
will
benefit
the
entire
state,
not
just
northern
nevada,
and
will
keep
our
workforce
working
in
the
event
of
another
downturn.
L
G
L
Good
afternoon,
chair
and
members
of
the
committee
for
the
record,
chelsea
c
h,
e
l
s
e,
a
capro
c-a-p-u-r-r-o
here
on
behalf
of
the
nevada
subcontractors
association,
we're
here
in
support
of
this
issue,
becoming
a
study
and
particularly
taking
a
closer
look
at
how
this
concept
could
affect
construction
in
the
state.
We
look
forward
to
being
part
of
this
study
during
the
interim
and
participating
in
the
process.
Thank
you.
G
J
Hi
there,
my
name
is
william
pete
and
I'm
that's
w-I-l-l-I-a-m-p-e-t-e
and
I'm
the
ceo
of
a
company
called
energy
ledger,
and
we
are
here
in
support
of
senate
concurrent
resolution
11.
J
J
To
you
know
you
know,
be
able
to
work
with
blockchain
and
develop
it
within
an
innovation
zone
that
is
kind
of
using
the
nimbleness
and
flexibility
that
the
states
have
to.
You
know
develop
these
new
brand
new
companies
that
can
bring
in
new
revenue
and
new
opportunities
for
job
growth,
all
sorts
of
things
that
weren't
presently
there
and
have
kind
of
been
taken
away
during
these
hard
times.
J
I
really
truly
believe
that
through
senex
and
current
resolution
11,
we
can
achieve
some
of
this
and
it's
a
huge
step
forward
to
creating
these
these
green
jobs-
and
you
know,
companies
like
mine,
energy
ledger-
would
be
able
to
take
advantage
of
such
a
situation
and
you
know
be
able
to.
Potentially
you
know,
do
work
in
nevada.
You
know
due
to
the
you
know
the
provisions
of
this
bill.
I
think
this
is
this
resolution.
J
G
I
S-C-O-T-T-F-U-L-L-E-R-T-O-O
and
the
district
representative
for
the
operating
engineers,
local
uni
number
three
here
in
northern
nevada,
we
are
in
support
of
str11
and
its
study
concerning
innovation
zones.
We
believe
the
diversification
diversification
that
this
will
offer
nevada
is
greatly
needed
compared
to
the
current
economic
situation
that
we
have.
I
We
also
believe
that
it
has
potential
to
offer
great
jobs
for
highly
skilled
individuals
here
in
nevada
and
also,
we
believe
it
has
a
commitment
to
not
only
provide
the
good
jobs
for
today's
working
men
and
women,
but
to
develop
a
good
workforce
for
the
future,
which
will
develop,
which
will
benefit
all
businesses
moving
forward,
and
I
appreciate
your
time
on
this
and
again
we
are
in
support
of
scr
11..
Thank
you.
G
M
My
name
is
trent
poole,
t-r-e-n-t
p-o-o-l.
I
am
one
of
the
directors
with
the
blockchain
center
foundation.
We
have
had
a
lot
of
our
stakeholders
and
members
and
people
in
our
community
testify
today
just
to
be
clear.
We
are
not
associated
with
block
chains
llt
or
any
other
blockchain
entity.
That
is
testified
in
other
hearings,
although
we
have
testified
in
favor
of
some
of
their
bills.
M
We
are
an
organization
that
was
began
in
2013
on
wall
street
right
across
the
new
york
stock
exchange
by
nick
spanis
and
some
of
his
partners,
with
the
goal
of
educating
and
empowering
legislators
and
people
that
work
in
regulatory
agencies
in
new
york,
city
and
wall
street,
to
explain
the
benefits
of
distributed,
ledger
technology,
blockchain
and
decentralized
finance,
and
that
was
eight
years
ago
today,
we're
doing
a
lot
of
cooler
things
offering
classes
and
empowering
legislators
and
people
in
your
position.
Thank
you
by
the
way
chairman
orange
hall
and
members
of
the
committee.
M
I
didn't
say
that,
because
I
had
to
give
my
name
starting
off,
but
we
really
appreciate
this
opportunity
and
if
any
of
you
guys
do
need
a
course
or
are
curious
to
dabble
in
understanding
more
about
distributed,
ledger
technologies
blockchains,
especially
or
anything
that
would
implement
decentralized,
standardized,
operating
procedures
and
innovate.
We
would
love
to
offer
that
to
you
guys,
and
we
could
certainly
figure
out
a
good
curriculum
to
help
you
all.
We
really
appreciate
you
guys
considering
str11.
M
We
are
strongly
in
support
of
it.
We
believe
that
the
future
to
finance
the
future,
to
probably
all
industries,
is
going
to
incorporate
a
lot
of
things
that
are
on
the
cutting
edge
and
in
the
emerging
technology
sphere,
including
blockchains,
especially
for
a
lot
of
the
energy
use
cases
and
production
commodities
and
things
of
that
nature,
and
so
we
really
are
excited
to
be
able
to
be
with
you
guys
in
this
committee
and
offer
feedback
advice
or
help
you
guys
bounce
ideas
around
on
things
that
might
be
beneficial
to
study.
M
Like
I
said,
we've
worked
with
legislators
in
over
a
dozen
states
and
we
are
helping
advance
and
advocate
for
implementing
and
innovating
on
all
skiers,
so
we
can
keep
competitive
in
our
21st
century
economy.
Thank
you
guys.
So
much
and
appreciate
being
here.
G
G
A
N
Good
afternoon,
chair
and
members
of
the
committee
for
the
record,
my
name
is
annette
magnus
and
I'm
the
executive
director
of
battleborn
progress.
We
rise
in
strong
opposition
to
scr
11
and
this
flawed
dangerous
innovation
zone
proposal
as
a
study
at
the
time
at
a
time
when
our
state
is
facing
unaffordable
housing
crisis,
lack
of
access
to
adequate,
affordable
health
care,
a
poorly
funded
education
system.
It
is
grievously
inappropriate.
N
N
Now
we're
debating
to
study
whether
to
give
a
billionaire
his
own
autonomous
government
for
magical
thinking,
pipe
dream,
the
ceo's
own
words
have
said
we
have
not
made
in
any
money
and
we
have
not
actually
figured
out
where
we
will
extract
fees
even
worse
than
that,
even
worse
than
previous
boondoggles.
This
time
we
truly
have
no
idea
what
nevada
is
supposedly
getting
out
of
this
deal
or
how
this
will
even
create
jobs
or
how
it
generates
revenue
or,
more
importantly,
what
they
will
even
be
innovating
on
its
face.
N
This
blockchain
quasi
county
would
require
stealing
water
from
tribal
governments
who
are
not
who
were
not
consulted
before
blockchain
started
buying
up
the
rights.
It
also
raises
serious
concern
about
the
setting
of
precedent
for
the
return
of
company
towns,
which
is
exactly
what
this
is,
regardless
of
how
you
try
to
dress
it
up.
N
While
this
resolution
only
requires
the
study
of
this
proposal,
we
remain
extremely
concerned
that
proper
input
will
not
be
sought,
nor
that
input
will
be
heated
in
whatever.
The
final
report
concludes
this
legislature
and
this
committee
has
the
ability
to
reject
this
ridiculous
concept
here
and
now.
N
N
G
G
A
O
Innovation
zones
was
a
concept
that
first
came
forward
to
a
a
large
amount
of
opposition,
mostly
because
of
the
size,
the
scope
and
the
timeline
provided
in
the
2021
legislative
session
seemed
like
it
was
incompatible
with
the
size,
scope
and
the
proposed
project
of
innovation
zones,
but
we're
here
today
in
neutral,
because
we
are
looking
forward
to
the
discussion
provided
by
scr11
and
what
it
could
accomplish
in
the
interim
study,
which
is
to
provide
silver
state
government
relations,
looks
forward
to
taking
part
in
that
study
because
of
the
joint
resolution
or
the
joint
committee's
goal
and
scope
of
you
know
addressing
the
concerns
of
local
and
regional
governments,
tribal
governments
and
addressing
the
the
concerns
regarding
water
and
water
usage
with
innovation
zones.
A
F
Good
afternoon,
chair
orange
all
members
of
the
committee,
my
name
is
dagny
stapleton,
I'm
the
executive
director
of
naco,
the
nevada
association
of
counties.
We
are
neutral
on
scr,
11
and
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
provide
testimony
today
when
the
idea
of
innovation
zones
was
introduced.
The
proponents
reached
out
and
presented
their
concept
and
preliminary
language
to
counties
and
county
representatives
did
share
a
handful
of
concerns
with
them
at
that
time.
F
We
appreciate
scr
11
and
want
to
thank
the
governor's
office
for
the
proposed
study
to
look
at
and
analyze
issues
connected
to
the
concept
of
innovation
zones
prior
to
any
innovations
on
legislation
being
introduced.
We
also
appreciate
the
language
and
the
resolution
recognizing
the
important
role
that
counties
would
play
in
the
study
committee.
F
We
look
forward
to
participating
in
the
study
and
providing
any
and
all
information.
That
would
be
helpful
again,
our
thanks
to
the
sponsor
and
the
committee.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
very
much,
miss
stapleton
and
anyone
else
neutral.
Who
wishes
to
be
heard
here
in
carson
city.
P
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
and
members
of
the
committee
for
the
record,
mary
walker,
m-a-r-y
w-a-l-k,
I'm
representing
carson
douglas
lyon
and
story
counties.
We
are
neutral
on
scr
11,
but
we
would
like
to
thank
the
governor
and
the
legislature
for
ser
11
study
concerning
innovation
zones.
We
appreciate
the
even-handed
approach
of
the
study,
which
includes
studying
the
impact
on
of
innovation
zones
on
counties,
but
also
on
local
revenue
and
taxation,
because,
while
it
has
been
stated
that
there
is
no
state
revenue
or
taxation
impact,
there
is
tremendous
local
revenue
and
taxation
implications.
P
A
Q
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
I'm
austin
osborne
from
story
county,
I'm,
the
story,
county
manager,
story
county
is
supporting
a
neutral
position
on
this.
The
board
of
county
commissioners
on
four
separate
occasions
throughout
the
year
had
voted
a
little
bit
of
a
mixed
bag
on
what
was
known
so
far
at
the
time.
Q
As
far
as
technology
blockchains
cryptocurrencies
those
sorts
of
things,
the
board
is
totally
in
favor
of
those
sorts
of
matters
as
long
as
the
state
puts
together
the
right
framework
for
their
implementation,
the
residential
component,
including
the
smart
city
and
the
idea
of
having
high
density
and
all
that
out
of
painted
rock
in
story
county,
has
been
suggested
so
far.
The
board
has
supported
that
our
master
plan
also
supports
that
as
far
as
separation
from
government
and
anything
related
to
that,
our
board
has
strongly
opposed
that.
Q
Q
Q
You
know
waste
to
energy,
green
energy.
Everything
you
can
imagine
is
all
done
through
complex
development
agreements
that
we
put
together
and
embrace.
We
have
a
tax
increment
area
that
pays
for
a
regional,
affluent
pipeline
project
that
we
were
part
of
and
embrace.
We
have
a
government
services
agreement
with
tesla,
where
there's
no
taxes
paid,
but
we
still
embrace
that
because
we
offset
our
cost
and
we
welcome
it.
We
were
part
of
sb1
that
some
of
you
were
also
involved
with
brought
data
and
big
companies
to
our
state.
Q
We
have
a
general
improvement
district
out
at
tri
and
story
county
that
provides
all
the
utility
services
out
there
in
a
very
efficient
manner,
and
we
provide
all
of
these
companies
out
there,
30-day
building
permits
and
five-day
grading
permits,
and
we
would
do
the
same
thing
for
any
company
that
wants
to
come
in
the
future,
including
those
in
proponent
of
this
bill.
We
do
believe
that
we
are
the
innovation
zone
as
it
is
currently
as
far
as
the
smart
city
goes
out
of
painted
rock.
Q
Our
master
plan
was
completely
updated
in
2016,
through
community
workshops
in
rigorously
over
three
to
seven
years.
We
completely
rewrote
our
zoning
ordinances
and
our
subdivision
ordinances
and
the
water
elements
of
those
ordinances
to
accommodate
the
painted
rock
housing
development.
That
project
was
also
approved
by
the
board
of
story
county
commissioners
and
the
planning
commission
for
rigorous
public
workshops
in
2006,
and
that
action
is
also
reflected
in
our
master
plan.
Q
So
this
play,
we
are
still
neutral
on
this,
but
really
we
just
ask
the
applicants
to
submit
an
application
and
they
can
build
all
of
the
things
that
are
being
proposed.
So
far
we
will
roll
out
the
red
carpet
for
the
types
of
developments
are
being
proposed
without
separation
from
government.
Thank
you.
P
Good
afternoon,
mr
chairman
and
members
of
the
committee,
my
name
is
sarah
adler,
with
silver
state
government
relations,
and
today
I'm
honored
to
present
to
you
the
testimony
of
janet
davis,
tribal
chairwoman
of
the
pyramid,
lake
paiute
tribe,
the
pyramid
lake
paiute
tribe,
would
like
to
indicate
their
neutrality
on
scr
11
and
the
study
of
innovation
zones.
Pierband
lake
was
opposed
to
the
concept
of
innovation
zones
when
first
introduced
due
to
the
lack
of
transparency
and
tribal
inclusion.
P
We
would
like
to
thank
the
governor
and
the
authors
of
sar
11
for
their
thoughtful
inclusion
of
tribal
perspectives
and
ensuring
the
study
will
also
consider
the
impact
of
the
potential
development
on
the
natural
resources
of
the
area,
including
water.
In
addition,
we
would
like
to
note
that
any
analysis
of
the
potential
for
the
creation
of
new
forms
of
governments,
such
as
an
innovation
zone,
should
protect
the
tenants
of
adjudicated
agreements
such
as
the
truckee
river
operating
agreement,
and
must
include
the
need
for
government
to
government
consultation
with
native
american
tribes.
R
R
Second,
as
ms
walker
mentioned,
we're
particularly
thankful
for
the
inclusion
of
local
jurisdiction,
governance
and
taxation
issues
in
the
scope
of
the
study,
as
both
the
potential
impacts
and
opportunities
are
substantial.
With
a
proposal
like
this,
we
are
supportive
of
the
study
process
and
look
forward
to
being
active.
Participants
were
testifying
in
neutral
on
the
resolution
because,
as
my
county
manager
stated,
we
maintain
that,
at
least
in
the
case
of
blockchains
llc,
a
separate
new
and
untested
political
subdivision
is
unnecessary.
To
accomplish
the
stated
goals
of
the
proponents.
R
A
R
We
do
not
necessarily
supply
water.
There
is
a
gid
and-
and
mr
adler
may
be
able
to
talk
more
about
that
because
he
represents
them
but
yeah.
We.
We
are,
of
course
concerned
about
water
usage
and
that's
that's
got
to
be
a
major
part
of
the
conversation.
A
G
L
S-H-A-R-I-W-H-A-L-E-N,
I'm
the
general
manager
for
the
tri
general
improvement
district
in
story,
county
tri,
general
equipment
district
is
the
water
and
sewer
utility
serving
the
tahoe
reno
industrial
center
and
the
surrounding
area
in
northwestern
nevada.
The
district
was
established
in
2001
by
story
county
pursuant
to
nrs318.
L
Today
we
manage
a
water
resources,
portfolio
of
over
12
000,
acre
feet
of
groundwater
and
truckee
river
surface
water.
We
also
collaborate
on
management
of
an
additional
4
000
acre
feet
of
trees
effluent
under
contract
to
serve
an
expansive
and
innovative
regional
water
reuse
system.
That's
currently
under
construction
for
20
years,
trade
gid
served
as
one
of
the
most
flexible
and
dynamic
local
governments
in
the
state
of
nevada.
This
is
evidenced
by
the
huge
success
and
positive
economic
impact
of
the
tahoe
rio
industrial
center.
L
L
The
criteria
by
which
an
innovation
zone
could
be
created
currently
exists
within
the
trade
gid
service
area,
thereby
creating
potential
impact
to
the
district's
customers.
In
fact,
97
percent
of
the
land
owned
by
blockchains
in
story
county
is
within
the
boundaries
of
the
tri-gid
service
area.
This
is
excuse
me.
Staff
immediately,
engage
and
understand
the
concept
and
framework
for
innovation
zones
by
attending
informational
meetings
with
blockchains
on
their
lobby
team,
as
well
as
review
draft
legislation.
Language
summary
information
and
the
economic
impact
study
presented
on
excuse
me.
L
The
innovation
zone
facts
website
on
march,
2nd
2021,
the
trade
jd
board
of
trustees
voted
unanimously
to
direct
staff
to
negotiate
with
blockchains
to
resolve
the
current
concerns
of
the
district
related
to
potential
legislation
on
innovation
zones.
After
receiving
this
direction
from
our
board
of
trustees,
trade
gid
staff
began
to
meet
and
communicate
with
our
partners
and
blockchains
on
a
regular
basis.
L
In
concert
with
the
blockchains
team,
the
district
identified
and
refined
the
following
concerns
related
to
the
innovation
zone
concept.
One
is
a
potential
residential
encroachment
into
the
district's
non-residential
service
territory.
Two
are
the
assumptions
and
projections
of
the
innovation
zone.
Economic
impact
study:
three:
is
the
innovation
zone,
potentially
usurping
the
district's
governance
authority
of
powers.
L
Four
is
the
innovation
zone,
application
process
and
impact
to
the
eminent
domain,
powers
of
the
district
and
other
local
governments,
and
five
is
the
innovation
zone,
impact
on
existing
contractual
obligations
related
to
water
and
sewer
service
and
infrastructure.
The
district
and
the
blockchain
team
continued
to
communicate
regularly
on
the
innovation
zone
concept
throughout
march
and
april.
These
meetings
were
generally
productive
and
the
collaborative
discussions
made
progress
on
some
of
the
items
outlined
above
if
the
senate
legislate.
L
Excuse
me
if
the
senate
committee
on
legislative
operations
and
elections
chooses
to
adopt
senate
concurrent
resolution
11
trade
jd
is
interested
in
continuing
this
collaboration.
It
is
our
goal
to
support
and
advocate
for
the
interests
of
the
district's
existing
and
future
customers
by
providing
ongoing
input
to
the
special
committee.
It
is
our
intent
to
maintain
the
ability
and
the
district
statutory
authority
to
continue
to
operate
efficiently
and
to
provide
statutorily
defined
services
within
our
district
in
a
fiscally
and
environmentally
sound
manner.
L
A
L
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
There
are
sufficient
water
resources
to
continue
development
within
the
tri-gid
service
area.
However,
under
the
economic
impact
study
that
was
created
by
the
innovation
zone,
there's
about
five
thousand
acre
acres
of
land
to
be
developed
in
inside
of
story
county
outside
of
the
district
service
area
at
in
the
painted
rock
area
and
to
my
knowledge
at
this
time,
the
water
resources
have
not
been,
maybe
maybe
the
appropriate
way
to
say
we're,
not
aware
of
a
plan
to
serve
water
to
that
area.
L
A
Thank
you,
ms
wellen.
Thank
you
very
much
members
any
additional
questions.
Okay,
not
seeing
any
broadcasting
if
we
can
go
back
to
the
phone
lines,
anyone
who's
neutral
on
the
measure.
A
B
Thank
you,
chairman
I'll,
just
close
by
saying
thank
you
to
the
committee
for
hearing
this
today.
Obviously
thank
you
to
speaker,
fryerson
and
majority
leader
for
their
support
of
the
governor
on
this
process
and
this
proposal
and
I'd
be
remiss.
If
I
didn't
say
thank
you
to
mr
fernley
for
working
not
only
on
this
concurrent
resolution,
but
the
underlying
proposal
really
appreciate
that.
A
Thank
you
very
much
and
thank
you,
mr
friendly,
we're
very
lucky
to
have
you
here
at
lcbn,
as
our
committee
council.
Well,
thank
you
very
much
for
being
here
and
now
close
the
hearing
on
senate
concurrent
resolution,
11
and
assemblyman
haven.
Thank
you
for
your
patience,
we'll
open
the
hearing
on
assembly
bill
166.
S
S
S
S
In
summary,
assembly
bill
166
is
not
a
very
complex
bill.
It
is
simply
to
moderate
modernize
campaign
disclosure
requirements
in
nevada
by
making
sure
text
messages
from
a
person,
a
path,
a
political
party
or
committee
sponsored
by
a
political
party
to
disclosing
the
text
message
the
name
of
the
individual
or
entity
who
paid
for
the
communication-
and
I
want
to
elaborate
just
a
little
bit
on
that
this
would
not
be
the
standard
disclosure.
The
standard
disclosure
requires
you
to
stay
friends
of
gregory,
t,
haven
ii
with
my
address
and
everything
else.
S
This
is
to
try
to
adopt
and
adapt
into
the
text
message
realm,
where
we're
limited
to
the
characters,
and
it
could
be
as
simple
as
me
adding
a
bit
link
to
my
website.
So
people
know
that
it
was
me
that
paid
for
it
or
it
could
be
as
simple
as
saying
this
is
assemblyman
hafen
blah
blah
blah
to
be
more
consistent
with
the
modern
technology
to
be
more
consistent
with
the
current
law
there.
S
And
having
said
that,
I'll
try
to
keep
this
shorter
than
the
last
presentation
and
see.
If
there's
any
questions.
E
Thank
you,
chair
orange
and
welcome
again.
So
do
you
have
an
idea?
I
don't
know
how
many
characters
you
can
actually
have
in
a
text
message,
and
so
you
just
meant
said
that
you
could
have
a
link
to
a
website
or
a
link
to
something.
So
what
what's?
Typically
the
characters
for
a
text
message,
character,
count.
S
Through
you,
mr
chair,
we
can
go
directly
to
the
senator
thanks,
senator
ganzar,
so
there's
a
variety
of
companies
that
use
different
character
limitations.
Some
will
limit
you
to
160
characters
where
others
will
actually
limit
you
to
318
characters.
S
S
I
I
think
that
it
just
has
to
do
with
the
vendor,
and
that
is
why
I
mentioned
the
bit
link
those
that
are
not
familiar
with
the
bitlink
is
you
could
take
a
very
long
website
that
you
know
could
take
up
this
entire
page
and
shrink
it
till
it's
only
about
this
big
and
take
up
one
line
in
a
text
message,
because
the
intent
of
this
is
is
to
adapt
to
the
modern
technology,
and
I
think
we
all
saw
during
the
covet
pandemic
text
messages
becoming
more
and
more
popular
means
of
communication
and
advertising
for
campaigns.
E
Thank
you,
I'm
just
looking
at
the
list,
so
I
think
that
makes
sense.
So
the
big
bit
they're
used
on
tweets
all
the
time
right.
So
the
short
link,
but
you
have
political
action,
political
party
committee
sponsored
by
a
political
party
that
paid
you
know.
Sometimes
I've
seen
him
come
through
from
non-profits.
I'm
just
kind
of.
I
think
the
intent
is
right
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
capture
everyone
and
that
what
you
actually
have
to
disclose.
E
Does
not
take
up
most
of
the
text,
so
people
don't
have
a
limit
in
communications,
so
I
think
that
probably
does
it,
but
then
you
have
the
name
of
the
person
committee,
political
action,
political
party
or
committee
sponsored
and
any.
In
any
case
I
did.
I
did
see
that
there
were
texts
going
through
by
like
non-profits
and
things
like
that.
So
I
guess
we
just
want
to
make
sure
we
capture
everyone.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you,
senators,
cancer
and
please
go.
C
M
Thank
you
senator
mark
colashan,
deputy
secretary
of
state
for
elections
for
the
record
interesting
question.
I
will
have
to
look
into
it
and
get
back
to
you.
I'm
not
100
certain.
If
non-profit
is
able
to
send
a
political
text
message
I'll
find
out
and
get
back
to.
You,
though,.
C
Okay,
thank
you
and
then
the
second
question,
I'm
in
section
three
where
it
says
that
the
people
that
consent
would
send
out
these
message
that
we
would
have
to
report
their
name.
Do
you
feel
like
that's
the
complete
list,
or
do
you
think
there's
missing
or
missing
anything
there.
M
Thank
you
for
the
question
mark
velasco
for
the
record
senator
we
did
talk
with
assemblyman
hayden
about
this
bill.
We
considered
it
and
had
some
discussions
internally
outside
of
the
the
lists
that
were
identified
in
this,
awarding
to
the
bill
that
there
were
no
other
entities
or
organizations
that
we
identified.
That
would
be
useful
to
incorporate.
C
It
does
thank
you
and
mr
movement
hafen,
and
I
had
lots
of
conversation
about
this
bill,
so
I
think
I'm
finished
with
my
questions.
Thank
you.
S
Enforced,
thank
you
senator,
so
I
actually
had
some
of
the
data
pulled
in
regards
to
this.
Currently,
the
enforcement
and
the
mark
can
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
currently
text
messages
are
being
enforced
on
when
complaints
are
filed
with
the
secretary
of
state's
office.
S
Those
are
investigated
and
in
our
discussions,
is
that
the
intent
here
would
be
that
if
there
is
a
disclosure
on
here
or
the
requirement,
90
of
people
are
going
to
comply,
I
mean,
I
think
every
single
one
of
us
in
this
room
would
probably
want
our
website
on
any
kind
of
communication
to
direct
people
towards
any
kind
of
advertising.
We'd
want
to
do.
S
This
should
make
the
secretary
of
state's
job
easier
in
investigating
those
90
percent,
because
they'll
know
exactly
where
to
go.
The
additional
10
percent
that
don't
comply
with
this
would
go
through
the
current
process.
That's
currently
being
done
at
the
secretary
of
state's
office
to
investigate
those
which
is
to
go
to
the
follow
the
phone
number
to
the
vendor.
The
vendor,
then,
would
have
to
pull
the
data
and
then
provide
who
the
individual
is,
but
it
would
be
the
same
process.
S
That's
currently
under
place
for
the
and
I'm
these
are
my
numbers
just
throwing
out
random
statistics
making
me
sound,
really
intelligent,
but
that
that
is
my
understanding
and
mr
watson,
if
you,
if
you
want
to
chime
in
and
add
to
that,
that'd,
be
great.
M
Thank
you,
assemblyman
and
exactly,
as
you
said,
the
process
as
it
currently
is
laid
out
marvelous
for
the
record.
We
we
would
investigate
it,
starting
with
our
civil
compliance
investigator
and
then
moving
on
to
criminal
if
it
deemed
appropriate
and
there's
a
number
of
methods.
Already
we've
identified
and
discussed
on
how
we
could
attempt
to
pursue
and
enforce
compliance.
C
S
T
Thank
you,
chair,
oran,
shaw
and
assemblyman.
I
just
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
were
clear
here
because,
as
I'm
looking
at
the
bill,
obviously
nrs294a
348
in
section
one
already
includes
the
same
type
of
language
for
newspapers,
radio,
magazines,
television,
outdoor
advertising
facility,
mailing
other
type
of
general
public
political
advertising,
and
what
you're
trying
to
do
is
add
the
same
the
same
or
similar
requirements
to
when
somebody
spends
more
than
a
hundred
dollars
using
text
messages
to
simply
identify
who
that
text
is
coming
from.
S
That
is
absolutely
correct
and-
and
we
had
conversations
early
on
about-
maybe
just
sticking
text
messages
in
the
front
part.
But
then
the
conversation
was
like
well,
then
you're
sub,
making
them
subject
to
the
full
long
friends
of
gregory
t
ii
at
5258
financial
representative,
and
so
we
we
felt
that
now
you're
taking
up
most
of
the
characters
by
just
having
to
disclose
my
entire
disclosure.
And
so
that's
why
we
decided
another
section
under
there
would
be
more
appropriate.
So
we
could
adapt
to
this
new
technology,
which
I
guess
text
messages
is
not
that
new.
T
Thank
you,
and
I
think
that
that
gets
to
the
second
point
that
I
wanted
to
make
was
that
we
are
really
just
talking
about
disclosing
who
that
is
coming
from
not
the
same
type
of
disclosure
that
you
might
see
on
like
a
mailing
that
would
go
out
or
other
advertisement
that
you
might
purchase,
and
I
think
you've
answered
that.
So
I
appreciate
it.
S
A
They
might
be
there,
in
which
case
I
can
look
that
up.
So
I
can
look
that
up
offline.
Thank
you
very
much
for
presenting
the
bill
and
because,
if
there
are
no
other
questions,
we'll
open
it
up
to
support,
I
don't
see
anyone
here
in
carson
city
and
support,
but
I'll
go
to
the
phone
lines
broadcasting.
If
there's
anyone
on
the
phone
lines
who
wishes
to
speak
in
support
of
assembly,
bill
166.
G
A
A
A
S
Just
like
to
say
thank
you
very
much
to
you,
mr
chairman,
and
to
the
the
committee
members.
It
was
great
to
be
here
spent
half
my
day
here
in
this
committee
room
with
other
committees,
so
it's
been
a
lot
of
fun.