►
Description
For agenda and additional meeting information: https://www.leg.state.nv.us/App/Calendar/A/
Videos of archived meetings are made available as a courtesy of the Nevada Legislature.
The videos are part of an ongoing effort to keep the public informed of and involved in the legislative process.
All videos are intended for personal use and are not intended for use in commercial ventures or political campaigns.
Closed Captioning is Auto-Generated and is not an official representation of what is being spoken.
A
Good
afternoon,
I
want
to
welcome
everyone
to
the
senate
committee
on
legislative
operations
and
elections.
Today
on
our
agenda.
We
are
hearing
one
bill
assembly,
bill
110,
which
relates
to
lobbyist
registration
and
we'll
be
holding
a
work
session
on
senate
joint
resolution,
eight
of
the
2019
session.
Additionally,
we
have
a
committee
bill
introduction,
madam
secretary,
we
do
have
a
quorum
present.
I
believe
that
all
our
members
are
present
here
at
our
virtual
meeting
before
we
begin
our
agenda,
I
want
to
briefly
explain
how
our
virtual
meetings
will
work.
A
I've
explained
it
before
so
I
know
it's
repetitive
for
many
members,
but
go
over
one
more
time.
Our
currently
our
legislative
building
is
closed
to
the
public
as
a
result
of
the
pandemic,
all
committee
meetings
are
being
held,
virtually
meaning
committee,
members,
staff
and
presenters
will
be
participating
either
through
zoom
or
by
telephone.
A
As
most
of
you
are
doing
now,
you
may
view
committee
meetings
online
through
the
legislature
streaming
service
or
on
the
legislature's
youtube
channel.
As
in
previous
sessions,
all
committee-related
information
is
available
on
the
nevada,
electronic
legislative
information
system
or
nellis,
which
is
accessible
from
the
legislature's
website.
A
A
Information
three
ways
are
one:
providing
testimony
by
a
telephone
during
committee
meetings,
two
submitting
written
testimony
and
three
using
the
opinion
poll
application
testimony
by
a
telephone
during
committee
meetings
to
testify
on
bills
or
provide
public
comment
during
this
session,
members
of
the
public
should
register
on
the
nellis
system
and
then
call
into
the
phone
number
provided
to
register.
You
click
on
the
participate
button
under
each
meeting
that
you're
interested
in
and
fill
out.
The
requested
information.
A
After
registering
you
call
the
number
provided
at
registration
and
then
you'll
be
placed
in
line
to
testify,
either
in
support
opposition
or
neutral
on
the
bill
or
you're
also
able
to
provide
public
comment
after
the
bill.
Hearings
are
done.
Our
broadcast
and
production
services
team
will
prompt
you
when
it
is
your
turn
to
speak.
This
is
a
first
come
first
serve
option
and
testimony
may
be
limited.
A
A
Please
include
on
your
written
testimony
the
bill
number
that
you're
writing
about
a
clear
title,
such
as
testimony
and
support
of
assembly
bill
123
and
your
name
and
if
you're
you're
representing
organization,
all
of
these
submissions
become
public
exhibits
posted
on
the
nella
system
for
the
public's
consideration
and
become
part
of
the
public
record.
A
The
legislature
website
opinion
poll
application
has
been
used
in
prior
sessions,
but
now
it's
more
prominently
displayed
and
located
in
more
places
than
previously
it's
available
by
clicking
on
the
submit
opinion
button
near
the
date
of
each
meeting.
Through
this
feature,
you
can
provide
comments
or
just
indicate
your
position
on
a
bill.
The
comments
are
only
available
to
legislators
and
do
not
become
part
of
the
public
record
for
public
comment.
A
The
committee
will
set
aside
a
time
at
the
end
of
today's
meeting
for
people
to
call
in
if
you
miss
a
meeting
and
want
to
know
what
happened.
All
committee
meetings
are
recorded
and
posted
on
the
legislature's
website,
usually
by
the
next
day.
I
know
that
was
a
lot
of
housekeeping
information,
but
please
don't
hesitate
to
contact
me
or
committee
staff
if
you
have
any
questions
or
need
help.
A
A
Hopefully
all
members
received
a
copy
of
this
pdr
earlier
today,
through
email.
Of
course,
we
will
hear
more
about
the
measure
once
the
resolution
is
referred
to
committee
and
scheduled
for
a
hearing.
I
want
to
remind
members
that
a
vote
to
introduce
this
bill
draft
request
is
not
an
indication
or
commitment
of
support
for
the
substance
of
the
bill.
We
just
need
the
committee's
approval
to
get
the
res.
The
resolution
in
process
assigned
a
bill
number
and
referred
to
a
committee
I'd
accept
a
motion
for
introduction
on
bdr
384.
B
A
Okay,
all
those
in
favor
and
we
do
need
a
roll
call
vote.
The
secretary
will
take
the
roll
call
vote.
A
A
Thank
you,
members
that
we'll
be
seeing
as
a
bill
soon
now
before
we
get
to
the
hearing
on
assembly
bill
110,
we
do
have
a
work
session
on
a
measure
we
previously
heard
senate
joint
resolution
8
of
the
2019
legislative
session.
We
heard
that
bill
this
session
on
february
23rd.
A
D
Thank
you,
mr
chair
and
committee
members
for
the
record
michael
stewart
committee
policy
analyst.
As
the
chair
noted
senate
joint
resolution,
number
eight
was
heard
on
february
23rd.
A
Thank
you
very
much,
mr
stewart,
and
I
was
really
impressed
by
our
majority
leaders.
Work
on
this
measure
proud
to
be
a
co-sponsor
and
to
have
supported
this.
During
the
2019
session.
I
received
overwhelming
support
last
session
in
the
assembly
in
the
senate.
Are
there
any
comments
or
questions
for
members
before
I
open
it
up
for
a
motion,
I
see
senator
vice
chair
lang
and
then
senator
sieber's
cancer.
Invite
your
lane.
E
Thank
you
chair.
I
was
going
to
make
the
motion
so
if
you
want
to
take
comment
and
come
back
to
me,
I'm
good
with
that.
B
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
I've
had
some
inquiries
about
making
sure
individuals
have
equality
as
far
as
religion
is
concerned,
and
so
I
wanted
to
get
a
clarification
on
the
record
whether
an
individual's
rights
to
practice,
religion
and
their
religious
beliefs
are
also
protected
via
this
legislation,
because
religion's
not
mentioned
creed
is
mentioned,
but
not
the
term
religion.
So
I
wanted
to
ask
legal
about
that.
A
F
You're
welcome
thank
you
and,
as
senator
stevens
gamster
mentioned,
the
the
language
of
the
bill
does
say.
Equality
rights
under
the
law
shall
not
be
denied
or
abridged
by
the
state
or
any
of
its
political
subdivisions
on
account
of
creed.
F
The
term
creed
means
a
system
of
religious
belief
or
a
set
of
beliefs
or
aims
which
guide
someone's
actions
based
on
those
definitions
of
the
term
creed.
It
is
our
opinion
that
the
word
creed
does
cover
religious
beliefs,
but,
in
addition
to
this
provision,
our
nevada
constitution
in
article
1
also
protects
freedom
of
religion,
so
there
is
already
a
constitutional
provision
that
prohibits
unequal
treatment
based
on
religious
beliefs.
This
this
particular
piece.
F
B
Thank
you,
mr
chair,
and,
and
thank
you,
mr
firmly,
and
then
one
additional
question.
The
the
process
for
this
is
for
a
joint
resolution
like
this,
because
it's
a
constitutional
amendment,
would
you
just
go
over
that
process
as
far
as
requiring
a
couple
of
votes
to
the
legislative
body,
and
then
also
that
would
be
put
on
the
ballot.
F
Yes
again,
this
is
brian
from
the
legislative
council,
so
this
joint
resolution
was
approved
by
the
legislature
in
the
2019
session.
If
it
were
approved
by
the
legislature
in
the
2021
session
this
session,
it
would
be
placed
on
the
general
election
ballot
in
the
2022
general
election
and
would
become
effective
and
part
of
the
constitution.
Only
if
the
voters
approved
the
resolution
by
mobility.
A
E
Thank
you,
chair
hall,
the
bill
before
us
today.
I
guess
I
feel
that
it's
redundant
as
it
discusses
equality
and
the
granting
of
protections
to
multiple
groups
or
of
citizens
within
nevada
and
the
constitutions
of
the
united
states
and
nevada
are
explicit
that
people
are
equal
with
equal
rights
under
the
law,
and
so
I
feel
that
we
already
have
documents
in
existence
guaranteeing
all
people,
meaning
every
person
is
already
granted
equal
rights.
So
equality
is
currently
granted
within
both
of
both
of
these
constitutions.
E
Those
inalienable
rights
granted
to
us,
through
their
guidance,
applied
to
each
one
of
us,
with
no
exceptions
and
no
carve
outs,
and
so
I
believe,
in
the
rights
of
all
people.
I
champion
a
society
that
can
accept
and
understand
changes
needed
and
necessary
as
more
and
more
humans
emerge
from
the
shadows
of
discrimination
and
look
toward
a
time
when
all
equal
stakeholders
in
their
town
cities
and
states
where
they
live.
E
I
embrace
that
voices
and
the
narratives
behind
those
who
have
said
enough
is
enough.
They
are
equal
and
I
am,
I
am
equal
with
them.
However,
a
bill
that
explicitly
lists
out
specific
groups
of
citizens
is
bound
to
miss
some
and
ultimately
allows
for
the
possibility
of
like
a
special
classes
of
people.
E
I
I
just
cannot
in
good
conscience,
support
a
bill
that
has
the
potential
to
harm,
exclude
or
potentially
forget
a
subgroup
of
people
who
were
left
off
the
list,
and
so
due
to
my
belief
in
our
state
and
federal
constitutions
and
the
fact
that
I
will
not
stand
for
any
bill
that
may
marginalize
any
potential
group.
I
must
vote
no
today
because
of
any
one
group
of
people,
but
not
because
of
any
one
group
of
people,
but
because
we
must
stand
for
every
person
having
equal
rights
period.
E
A
Well,
senator
buck.
I
appreciate
your
your
thoughts
and
your
concerns
and,
of
course,
you
know
our
our
chamber,
the
senate
in
the
70s,
did
vote
to
pass
the
equal
rights
amendment,
the
federal
equal
rights
amendment
for
gender
and,
unfortunately,
it
didn't
didn't
pass
over
in
the
other
house
and
it
didn't
pass
in
enough
states
to
be
ratified.
So
I
feel
like
there's
still
a
lot
of
work.
A
In
my
opinion,
that
needs
to
be
done,
whether
at
the
state
level
and
at
the
federal
level,
but
that
I'll
be
supporting
the
measure,
and
I
you
know
unless
there
are
any
any
legal
questions
for
mr
fernley.
I
I
think
I'd
accept
emotion
unless
there
any
specific
legal
questions
you
have,
but
other
than
that
we
can
have
discussion
after
after
there's
a
motion
and
a
second
all
right,
bye,
cheerleading.
A
A
A
Thank
you,
madam
secretary,
and
I'd
like
to
assign
the
floor
statement
for
that
bill
to
our
majority
leader.
It
did
pass
with
one
day.
A
A
You
know
this
is
women's
history
month
and
ms
erdos
is
our
our
first
female
director
of
the
legislative
council
bureau
and
what
tremendous
work
you've
been
doing
during
this
pandemic:
keeping
democracy
going,
keeping
our
our
representative
form
of
government
going
and
making
this
all
work
during
a
crisis
that
I
I
would
say,
none
of
your
your
male
predecessors
ever
had
to
face
anything
anything
comparing
to
this
in
in
in
any
example.
A
So,
certainly,
I
think
we're
very
privileged
to
have
our
our
first
female
director
of
nevada
history
of
the
legislative
council
bureau
here
making
sure
that
this
is
working
and
presenting
this
bill,
and
thank
you
for
everything
you
do.
Mr
dose.
A
H
Sure,
thank
you,
chairman
armstrong
and
madam
majority
leader
members
of
the
committee,
for
the
record.
My
name
is
jason
fryerson
assemblyman
for
district
8,
speaker
the
nevada
state
assembly,
and
I
am
pleased
to
present
to
you
assembly
bill
110
today.
H
H
I
think
cobot
revealed
challenges
that
we
have
with
respect
to
being
able
to
monitor
lobbying
activity,
but
also
increase
transparency
and
accountability.
H
They're
going
to
continue
to
be
zoom
meetings
and
team
meetings
and
virtual
participation,
and
I
think
that
this,
the
idea
behind
this
bill
was
was
to
increase
accountability
and
transparency,
so
that
the
public
knew
what
was
going
on
and
who
was
trying
to
influence
their
policy
makers,
and
this
bill
attempts
to
do
that,
and
so
I
am
going
to
allow
ms
earls
to
walk
through
it.
I
discuss
this
with
with
with
legal
and,
of
course,
lcb
is
not
able
to
advocate
on
behalf
of
policy.
H
So
it's
my
role
to
to
present
at
least
the
intent
behind
the
bill.
It
does
just
that,
in
addition
to
incorporating
both
regular
and
special
session
activity
and
again
acknowledges
a
new
normal
and
provides
a
way
for
us
to
increase
transparency
so
that
the
public
is
able
to
see.
You
know
how
their
legislators
are
interacting
with
advocates
and
with
that,
mr
chairman,
if
you
would
allow,
I
would
ask
that
director
erdos
walk
through
the
bill
and
answer
questions
as
it
pertains
to
the
language
of
the
bill.
G
Thank
you,
as
the
speaker
duly
noted,
interest
to
18f
150
prohibits
me
from
opposing
or
urging
the
passage
of
legislation,
except,
as
my
duties
require
me
to
make
recommendations
to
you.
I
don't
plan
to
urge
or
oppose
legislation
today,
but
instead
would
like
to
explain
the
provisions
of
ab110.
G
G
G
This
is
the
subsection
that
has
kept
us
from
registering
lobbyists
this
session,
because
they're
not
coming
in
the
building,
obviously
to
essentially
replace
paragraph
a
in
subsection
two
on
page
three
of
the
bill,
we've
added
paragraph
h
and
it
limits
the
provisions
of
paragraph
a
of
subsection
one
so
that
persons
who
can
find
their
lobbying
activities
to
communications
directly
with
one
or
more
members
of
the
legislative
branch
and
only
on
infrequent
basis,
who
did
not
otherwise
engage
in
lobbying
activities,
would
be
basically
be.
G
Our
new
definition
of
lobbyists,
so
the
goal
here
was
to
limit
the
the
definition
of
lobbyists
to
the
same
persons
who
are
currently
covered
by
the
definition
before
the
amendment
of
made
by
this
bill
and
others
before
taking
out
paragraph
a
that
is
we're
intending
that
this
bill
ensure
that
it
does
not
increase
the
number
of
persons
who
are
required
to
lobbyists
to
to
register
as
lobbyists,
but
but
truly
does
get
us
the
same
result
as
the
current
section
would
if
people
were
in
the
well
we're
in
the
building
sections,
2
and
2.7,
2.3
and
2.7
of
the
bill,
both
simply
clarify
that
lobbyists
are
still
only
required
to
register
during
a
regular
special
session.
G
That
is
that
they
have
allowed
being
activities
during
a
regular
special
session
is
when
they're
required
to
lobby.
We
wanted
to
make
that
clear,
because
any
change
in
the
definition
might
make
people
wonder
about
that
section.
Three
is
a
transfer
provision
that
only
applies
now
after
this
bill.
If
it's
adopted
to
ensure
a
clean
transition
for
the
registration
of
lobbying
this
session.
G
If
ab-110
is
passed
by
the
legislature
and
approved
by
the
by
the
governor,
it
is
effective
upon
passage
and
approval,
and
again
the
intent
is
to
get
us
to
the
same
place
as
we
would
have
been
with
this
definition
as
it
is.
Except
for
that
we
need
to
account
for
people
not
being
in
the
building.
So
we
believe
that
this
is
a
good
match
and
will
produce
the
same
same
result.
G
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
might
have,
and
brian
fernley
leadership
council
is
also
familiar
with
the
provisions
of
this
bill.
So
thank
you.
E
So,
thank
you,
chair
orange
hall.
I
was
just
wondering
how
what's
the
magic
number
of
legislators
that
quantifies
you
for
to
be
classified
a
lobbyist,
because
you
have
many
that
you
know
reach
out
to
several
different
legislators.
What's
the
magic
number.
H
I'm
willing
to
give
that
a
shot
and,
and
mr
fernley,
if
you
can
back
me
up
jason
fraction
for
the
record,
I
don't
believe
there
is
a
magic
number.
I
I
believe
that
the
definition
of
lobbyists
is
in
statute,
whether
you
advocate
paid
or
unpaid
on
behalf
of
someone
else,
it
could
be
one
other
person
or
entity
that
you
advocate
on
behalf
of
I.
H
I
think
you
are
not
required
to
lobbyist
if
you
are
not
being
paid
and
if
you
are
advocating
on
behalf
of
yourself
but
beyond
that,
I
don't
believe
there
is.
I
don't
believe
there
is
a
curve,
but
I
don't
believe
that
that
is
any
different
than
what
the
current
state
of
affairs
is,
and
I
don't
think
that
the
bill
is
intended
to
change
that
part
of
it.
E
Thank
you
chair
and
speaker
fryerson.
It's
always
good
to
have
you
here
in
the
senate
and
to
see
you
even
if
it
is
on
video,
wanted
to
thank
you
for
bringing
forward
this
bill
and
thank
ms
erdos
for
her
work
on
this
and
and
for
walking
us
through
some
of
the
pieces
of
this.
E
I
guess
I
wanted
just
to
make
sure
that
we
are
clear
on
this
subsection
age
which
talks
just
about
folks
who
confine
their
lobbying
activities
to
communicating
directly
with
members
only
on
an
infrequent
or
regular
basis.
I
don't
read
that
as
an
intent
to
say
that
if
you
are
a
lobbyist
and
would
be
considered
a
lobbyist,
if
you
just
confine
your
communication
to,
for
example,
either
speaker
of
ryerson
or
senator
seaver's,
gantzer
you're
only
talking
to
two
people,
and
you
talk
to
them
a
couple
times
that
would
still
be
considered
lobbying.
E
H
Well,
thank
you
majority
leader
through
you,
mr
chairman,
to
the
majority
leader
and
again
I
don't.
I
don't
want
to
put
lcb
in
a
position
on
having
to
advocate,
but
I
I
think
that
that
language
is
a
reflection
of
what
the
current
interpretation
is,
the
way
that
we
treat
it
currently
and
so
the
the
language
you
know
it.
H
It
is
a
it's
attempting
to
to
take
into
account
the
folks
that
happen
to
occasionally
lobby
but
don't
fall
under
the
technical
definition,
but
I
think
that
there
is
language
in
there
in
the
second
half
of
the
sentence
that
allows
for
the
interpretation
of,
I
think
exactly
what
you
alluded
to,
and
that
is,
if
you're
trying
to
skirt
it,
but
your
activity
is
really
what
a
lobbying
a
lobbying
activity
would
otherwise
be
in
stature
that
it
would
still
be
something
that
you
would
be
required
to
register.
A
A
Chair,
I
think
I
had
a
question
from
senator
sievers
cancer.
B
Thank
you,
mr
chair,
and
I
appreciate
this
legislation
being
brought
forward
because
we
are
in
very
unusual
times,
so
I
was
looking
at
section
3
2
that
talks
about
the
report,
including
the
first
report
filed
pursuant
to
218
h400
after
the
effective
date
of
this
act
report
concerning
the
person's
lobbying
activities
during
the
period
beginning
on
february
1st
and
ending
on
the
effective
date
of
this
act.
B
I'm
not
quite
sure
how
individuals
fill
that
out,
I
mean:
are
they?
Are
they
supposed
to
log?
Should
they
have
kept
a
log
of
all
the
conversations
they
had
or
not
quite
sure
how
that's
going
to
work?
So
maybe
you
can
add,
after
that,
what
the
expectations
are.
H
Sure,
thank
you
senator
sievers
again
for
the
record
jason
fryerson.
I
I
I
don't
know
that
we
are
as
concerned
about
a
conversation
as
we
are
about
and
if
you
know
essentially,
if
you
are,
if
you
are
being
taken
to
dinner
at
dukes
and
brought
you
know
having
wine
and
steak,
but
that
person
never
enters
the
building,
then
we're
trying
to
capture
that
activity.
The
point
of
that
section
is
referenced
is
simply
to
refer
back
to
february.
H
First,
the
start
of
a
session
which
has
been
what
lobbyists
have
to
do
anyway,
and
so
this
isn't
a
deviation
from
a
a
traditional
lobbyist
activity
other
than
they
haven't
been
allowed
in
the
building
to
register
yet,
and
so
because
they
haven't
been
allowed
in
in
the
building
to
register
yet
and
some
may
choose
not
to
ever.
H
This
is
intended
to
date
back
to
february
first,
and
I
have
yet
to
hear
from
a
a
lobbyist
who
has
not,
for
their
own
accounting
purposes
and
reporting
purposes,
kept
track
of
bodybuilding
activity
and
certainly
the
the
money
that
they
have
spent
since
the
start
of
session.
B
H
Receivers
yeah
this
bill
is
not
intended
to
increase
the
amount
of
information
that
they
have
to
report.
It
intends
to
to
capture
that
that
has
shifted
outside
of
the
book.
Mr
fernley,
if
you
wanted
to
provide
any
clarification,
please
free,
if
I'm
off
on
any
of
this.
F
Mr
fern,
yes,
thank
you.
This
is
brian
fernley,
218,
h,
400
is
the
section
that
requires
a
report
of
the
expenditures
by
lobbyists,
so
that
that's
what
subsection
2
is
doing
is
it's
requiring
that
for
support
of
expenditures
to
include
the
expenditures
going
back
to
february?
First.
B
Thank
you
for
that
clarification.
I
was
just
looking
that
up
and
I
and
I
would
agree
that
transparency
is
extremely
important,
so
so
thank
you.
A
Thank
you,
senator
stevers
cancer,
any
additional
questions
either
for
speaker
of
the
assembly,
director
of
legislative
council
bureau
or
our
legislative
council.
Mr
burnley
right,
I
don't.
I
don't
see
anyone
any
other
questions
from
the
committee.
I'd
like
to
go
to
any
additional
testimony
in
support
of
the
bill.
A
So
if
there's
anyone
in
the
queue
who's
in
support,
I'd
like
to
ask
broadcast
and
production
services,
is
there
anyone
who'd
like
to
speak
in
support
of
assembly
bill
110.
D
C
C
A
B
You
thank
you,
mr
you
know
in
looking
at
the
current
statute.
It
really
is
only
related
to
legislators,
lieutenant
governor,
lieutenant
governor
black
governor
and
governor
elect,
I'm
just
wondering
why
it
doesn't
extend
to
all
the
constitutional
offices
because
they
all
end
up
interacting
during
legislative
sessions.
A
Thank
you
and
whoever
care
to
speak
to
that
point.
H
This
is
jason
for
the
record
I
I
can
only
I.
I
have
actually
thought
about
that
question
senator
answered,
and
my
only
conclusion
was
that
the
governor
signs
bills
and
so
there's
a
direct
legislative
involvement
and
lieutenant
governor,
frequently
also
runs
senate
floor.
B
I
think
that's
something
we
may
want
to
consider,
I
don't
know
now
or
in
the
future,
because
the
various
offices
that
do
have
influence
and
and
advocate
for
certain
bills
during
all
of
our
legislative
sessions.
Thank
you.
A
C
C
C
B
A
D
D
C
C
I
am
very
appreciative
of
section
2h,
which
has
been
added
to
the
bill
that
appears
to
protect
people
as
grassroots
individuals
and
citizens
in
nevada
who
contact
the
legislature
and
who
are
not
focused
in
their
full
activities
on
lobbying.
So
we
feel
that
the
problems
we
initially
saw
with
this
particular
piece
of
legislation
have
been
corrected
in
this
section
on
2h,
and
we
thank
all
those
that
were
responsible
for
changing
this
legislation
so
that
it
would
not
cover
individuals
and
citizens
who
only
occasionally
participate
by
emailing
or
calling
the
legislature.
D
C
Good
afternoon
good
afternoon,
mr
chairman
and
committee
melissa,
clement
m-e-l-I-s-f-a-c-l-e-m-e-n-t
with
nevada
rights
life
in
support
of
ab-110.
I
want
to
thank
the
sponsor
mr
fryerson,
for
taking
our
concerns
into
mind
and
drafting
an
amendment
that
recognizes
the
grassroots
citizen
advocates
from
all
issues
and
all
sides
who
take
the
time
to
petition
their
state
government.
I
am
looking
forward
to
a
time,
hopefully
in
the
very
near
future,
that
the
legislative
building
will
once
again
be
open
to
nevada
citizens,
students
and
lobbyists
again.
Thank
you
very
much.
A
A
D
A
Right,
I
you
know
I'd
like
just
to
maybe
wait
one
more
minute,
because
the
technical
difficulties
in
case
there's
anybody
else
out
there
broadcast.
You
wanted
to
be
heard
so
committee.
If
you'd
indulge
me
just
one
more.
A
A
All
right
well,
thank
you,
speaker,
director,
and
to
mr
fernley
thank
you
for
presenting
the
bill
today.
I'd
like
to
bring
it
back
to
the
committee,
and
you
know,
I'd
open
it
up
for
a
motion.
I
think
that
it
would
be
important
to
try
to
move
this
bill
today.
If
that's
the
pleasure
of
the
committee,
would
there
be
a
motion?
A
A
A
A
Second,
for
majority
leader
kanazaro,
any
discussion
on
the
motion,
mr
chair,
senator
sievers
cancer,.
B
I'm
going
to
support
the
motion,
but
I
do
think
that
we
really
should
consider
adding
the
constitutional
officers.
I
have
a
a
list
of
the
different,
the
number
of
bills
that
can
be
proposed
by
the
different
offices
and
it's
anywhere
from
three
to
twenty
bills.
B
That
would
be
brought
during
session
and
not
I'm
not
talking
about
special
sessions,
but
during
a
regular
session,
and
so
they
they
too
have
significant
influence
and
are
part
of
this
process,
but
they
happen
to
be
in,
of
course,
constitutional
officers,
not
a
legislator,
the
governor
or
lieutenant
governor,
so
they're
not
on
the
list,
but
so
I'm
going
to
support
it.
But
I
really
think
we
should
consider
expanding
the
transparency
around
money
spent
for
for
all
those
individuals
as
well.
Thank
you.
A
A
Yes,
thank
you,
members.
It
looks
like
8110
passed
unanimously
and
I'll
take
the
floor
statement
for
that
unless
anyone
else
wants
it,
but
if,
if
so,
just
let
me
know
and
I'll
pass
it
on
to
you
but
I'll
I'll
take
the
floor
statement
for
now,
and
I
appreciate
the
speaker,
the
director
and
mr
friendly
for
being
here.
I
think
all
we
have
left
right
now
is
our
last
agenda
item
public
comment
and
if
we
you
know
broadcast,
I
know
we
had
some
technical
difficulties.
D
A
A
A
Right,
well
again,
you
know
I,
I
appreciate
everyone's
hard
work
today
and
their
efforts
and
if
there
was
who
wanted
to
speak,
I'm
getting
a
message
that
there
is
someone
in
the
queue,
but
if
broadcast
not
seeing
them
I
broadcast.
Could
you
check
one
more
time
because
I'm
getting
an
instant
message
that
there
is
someone
in
the
queue.
D
D
I
Promoting
gender
identity
in
the
state
constitution
would
authorize
that
men
who
identify
as
women
be
allowed
to
compete
against
biological
women
and
sporting
events.
This
will
crush
women's
sports
and
subvert
the
chances
for
nevada's
young
women
to
advance
in
their
athletic
field
and
receive
scholarships
to
further
both
their
athletic
and
scholastic
goals.
I
I
I
D
A
Okay,
one
more
little
difficulty,
sorry
about
that.
I
had
my
own
technical
difficulty
thanks
everyone
for
your
participation
today,
we'll
be
meeting
thursday
at
3
30,
and
appreciate
everyone's
one's
hard
work
today
we're
adjourned.
Thank
you.