►
From YouTube: 2017-03-27 Node.js Foundation Board of Directors Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
B
B
A
B
C
D
D
D
D
B
B
B
E
E
E
E
F
F
A
B
G
B
Any
up
staying
my
some
passes.
Okay,
oh
wait.
I'm
looking
at
the
wrong
one:
okay,
social
stats.
Okay,
so
we
still
have
a
lot
of
Twitter
followers.
We
we're
doing
really
great
there.
We
also
have
you
know
a
lot
more
people
looking
at
us
on
medium
as
well,
so
that
that
publication
has
been
going
swimmingly
in
particular,
let's,
like
really
dig
into
medium,
we
we
launched
this
new
publication,
which
is
a
sort
of
our
first
really
like
formal
joint
thing.
B
With
the
evangelism
working
group,
we've
always
worked
with
the
evangelism
group
kind
of
on
a
more
kind
of
casual
basis,
but
now
members
of
the
evangelism
working
group,
our
editors
in
this
collection,
that
is
sort
of
co
edited
by
the
foundation,
communications
team
and
the
evangelism
working
group
and
they've
just
been
turning
out
like
all
kinds
of
great
content.
That's
getting
you
know
a
lot
of
people
seeing
it,
so
you
can
see
here
that
you
know
just
the
collection
itself
when
we
release
it
this
month
and
I
got
over
6,000
followers.
B
I
Was
going
to
remark
that
I'm
actually
really
excited
to
see
with
next
year's
survey
the
input
people
get
from
this
because
I
think
the
medium.
This
collection
is
already
really
awesome
and
from
a
learning
perspective,
I
think
they're,
like
the
amount
of
good
quality
resources
that
we're
providing.
This
is
like
really
exciting,
so.
G
Yeah
and
I
want
to
add
that
I'm
really
excited
to
have
that
evangelism
working
group
engaged
in
working
with
the
the
marketing
team.
I
think
that
you
know
represents
the
intent
of
both
of
those
groups
and
that
collaboration.
You
know,
teams
have
already
borne
fruit
and
open
up.
You
know
there's
the
rest
of
businesses
that
we
have
with
the
comedic
video
yeah.
B
Awesome
I'm
excited
about
it,
here's
our
sure
voice
for
februari,
so
yeah
we're
going.
We
don't
have
the
the
share
of
voice
the
texts
that
we
used
to
around
enterprise,
we're
still
kind
of
trying
to
figure
out
exactly
why
what's
going
on
there
yeah
any
questions
about
that
before
move
on.
E
J
K
B
Okay,
great
moving
along
so
there's
been
a
tsc
charter,
update
it's
very
near
being
finalized.
It
was
not
quite
finalized
in
time
for
this
board
meeting
to
be
approved
by
the
board,
but
it
is
quite
close
there.
This
is
basically
the
tsa
is
proposing
changes
to
their
charter.
That
will
need
to
be
read
fied
by
the
board,
because
the
Charter
was
created
and
ratified
initially
by
the
board.
The
majority
of
the
changes
center
around
how
membership
is
determined
and
how
people
leave.
B
Essentially,
you
know,
as
as
things
have
gotten
more
broken
off
and
specialized
in
all
the
different
code
groups.
There's
been
a
lot
of
people
that
have
been
on
the
tsc
just
kind
of
historically
that
aren't
really
doing
much
anymore,
and
it's
me
it's
difficult
to
get
quorum
and
so
trying
to
find
a
really
nice
way
of
getting
people
off
without
it
being
kind
of
any
kind
of
a
conflict,
or
anything
like
that.
So
just.
L
Just
quickly
there
is,
it
has
passed
the
tsc
there
was
enough
votes
collected
to
pass
this
at
the
TSA
level.
So
if
we
can
move
it
forward
here,
then
oh
really.
B
L
That's
fine,
so
I
did
I
included
a
in
the
email
I
sent
to
thee
to
the
board.
I
included
a
list
of
the
highlights
from
it.
Should
I
read
from
that
yeah.
L
So
as
Michael
so
just
focus
primarily
on
membership,
the
the
highlights
are,
it
removes
the
recommended
size
numbers,
so
there
was
a
like
it
fit
between
6
and
12.
In
practice,
we've
found
with
these
groups
is
just
you
know,
best
to
be
dynamic
in
and
adjust
the
situation.
So
there's
no
point
in
having
if
they
even
a
recommendation
in
there
there's
an
explicit
option
added
for
inviting
observers
to
participate
in
meetings.
L
We've
got
a
bunch
of
these
observers
listed
on
our
meeting
invites
and
we
do
broadcast
them
as
well,
but
these
people
can
participate
in
the
meetings.
The
TSE
decides
that
there's
an
explicit
option
to
delegate
the
meeting
chair
just
because
that
wasn't
there
before
and
then
the
biggest
change
is
the
participation
requirements
for
TSE
members.
L
So
the
new
clause
in
this
is
in
the
case
where
an
individual
t
see
member
within
within
any
three
month
period
attends
fewer
than
twenty
five
percent
of
the
reg
regularly
scheduled
meetings
does
not
participate
in
tsc
discussions
and
does
not
participate
in
tsc
votes.
There
Michelle
be
automatically
removed
from
the
tsc.
The
member
may
be
invited
to
continue
attending.
The
meetings
is
an
observer
now.
The
important
thing
to
note
there
is
that
we
conduct
a
lot
of
our
business
and
voting
and
discussions
on
github.
L
So
it's
not
actually
a
requirement
here
to
be
in
meetings.
It's
a.
It
is
a
participation
rule,
so
that's
the
that's
the
main
Clause
there
and
then
removing
the
two-thirds
vote
requirement
for
membership
changes
to
the
Charter.
So
all
the
votes
now
are
just
simple
majority.
We
just
covered
that
the
two
thirds
thing
was
a
mistake,
for
we
had
two
thirds
for
a
couple
of
things
in
there.
So
that's
been
removed.
So
it's
just
simple
majority,
but
you
can
look
at
the
link
to
the
pull
request
and
seeing
the
diff.
H
B
L
B
Think
we
do
have
a
hot
spot
for
it.
No
I
thought
I
added
another
spot
for
it,
it's
probably
at
the
end:
okay,
cool
community
committee
charter.
So
we
we
had
an
email
resolution
already
to
ratify
this
Charter,
but
I
just
wanted
to
follow
up
and
make
sure
that
we
got
it
in
the
the
minutes
that
we
have
ratified
the
Charter
yes
and
yay
claps
all
around
yeah.
I
Was
going
to
say
that
everyone
who
is
interested
in
listening
should
go
to
the
community
committee
repo
because
we're
going
to
be
planning
our
first
public
meeting.
It
would
be
really
nice
to
have
more
people's
voices
and
input
in
that
moving
forward,
because
we've
got
lots
of
tasks
that
we
can
jump
on
now.
But
we
don't
want
to
go
hazard
Lee
about
that.
So.
F
B
Moving
along
Tracy,
you
want
to
give
us
this
education
update,
sure.
I
So
the
certification
process
is
moving
along
I
believe
so.
I
have
all
of
the
item.
Writing
review
team
members
have
been
notified
and
are
being
on
boarded
this
week
to
the
certification,
private
repo,
where
the
item
questions
will
exist
and
then
the
item
writers,
which
is
a
larger
group
of
people,
are
have
been
invited
and
are
rounding
out.
The
contributor
agreement
to
keep
those
item
questions
private,
but
we
are
excited
to
be
moving
forward
with
that.
I
So
that's
that's
huge
and
so
that
that
will
be
a
surprisingly
shorter
process
than
what
has
been
to
the
waiting
over
the
last
bit
of
this
year
and
then
the
second
piece
of
that
is
outreach
to
training
and
education
orgs.
So
we've
got
this
great.
These
great
guides
that
we're
going
to
be
running
with
in
terms
of
topics
and
the
subtopics
for
what
we
want
to
be
testing
for
a
beginner
intermediate
no
developer,
but
we
need
curriculum
to
go
alongside
that
from
training
and
other
education
works.
So
I
would
love
to
see
more
people.
I
G
G
I
That's
a
good
question,
so
what
I
mean
by
this
is
that
I'm?
Looking
for
organizations
you
know
such
as
our
member
companies
like
note
source
that
that
are
creating
this
training
right
so
that
they
already
they
already
do
this
and
we're
going
to
be
creating
this
list
right.
We're
going
to
be
publishing
this
list
of
places
that
are
great
to
go
in
order
for
you
to
learn
to
go
through
this
process.
I
To
get
to
the
point
where
you
pass
this
certification,
we
want
to
set
everyone
up
for
success,
so
in
order
to
do
that,
I
really
want
a
comprehensive
list
of
offerings
for
that,
and
I
also
want
to
make
sure
that
if
there
are
other
organizations
that
may
have
created
content
for
node,
but
it
might
be
outdated
and
I
would
love
to
talk
to
them
about
the
changes
that
they
need
to
make
to
sort
of
get
folks
there
to
set
them
up
for
success.
For
passing
the
certification.
E
G
J
G
G
I
That's
family
yeah
that
the
topics
and
the
sub
domains
were
shared,
I
believe
in
December,
and
we
also
linked
to
them
in
the
article
for
the
certification.
A
couple
articles
that
I
had
done.
But
I'm
happy
to
reshare
that
as
well,
because
I
discovery
is
fun
and
note
and
I'm
also
happy
to
go
into
more
detail
about
that
with
people
without
giving
away
guidance
themselves.
G
I
G
I
Cool,
so
the
next
bit
is
code
and
learn
SF,
so
we
are
going
to
be
running
the
first
code
and
learn
in
San.
Francisco
I
know
that
there
have
been
I
believe,
there's
been
other
node
2
t's,
especially
there
and
we're
fortunate
enough
to
have
rich
in
Anna
who
have
been
leading
the
cause
on
that
to
be
returning
to
code
and
learn
SF
right
now.
I
The
next
bullet
is
known:
interactive
talks,
Elections
Committee,
so
we're
really
excited
about
note
interactive
this
year
and
as
part
of
that,
we
are
constantly
trying
to
figure
out
ways
that
we
can
provide
better
quality
content
for
everyone
attending
and
also
include
the
community,
and
that
is
both
you
know:
enterprise
and
our
individual
community
members
in
the
process.
So
what
we've
done
is
built
a
tox
elections
committee
that
talks
elections.
Committee
includes
the
following
people:
it
is
chris
williams,
marco
kosaka
Jo,
HN,
Sofia,
Abdullah,
James,
Snell
and
thomas
watson.
I
All
of
these
people
are
incredible
speakers.
An
excellent
technologists
and
I'm
very
excited
to
hear
their
input
as
to
the
selections
that
will
have
for
our
talks.
The
process
for
selecting
talks
will
begin
after
our
CFP
closes
on
April,
10
and
I.
Believe
our
schedule
for
releasing
speakers
to
the
public
on
the
website
is
going
to
be
May
twenty-third,
but
speakers
will
be
notified
much
sooner
than
that.
A
Awesome
I
have
a
quick
question
about
that.
Just
I
know
that
in
the
past
we
have
done
keynotes
based
on
primarily
sponsors.
A
Are
we
changing
up
at
all
how
we
are
choosing
keynotes?
Is
this
selection
committee,
a
part
of
that
and
I
know?
At
one
point,
we
had
talked
about
sending
something
to
the
sponsoring
companies
about
diversity
and
inclusion,
with
the
idea
that
perhaps
they
send
a
different
trip
of
representative.
It's.
I
A
excellent
question:
we
don't
have
anybody
from
events
on
the
call,
so
I
will
speak
for
that,
so
we
do
still
have
availability
of
some
notes
being
from
sponsors.
That
number
has
been
reduced.
We
are
also
wanting
and-
and
we
did
think-
that
the
idea
of
a
guideline
for
companies
providing
their
keynote
speaker
and
content
would
be
really
helpful,
so
we're
definitely
working
on
how
we
can
provide
better
content,
also
within
the
keynote
structure
but
yeah,
there
are
there's
more
non-sponsored
slots
this
year
for
the
keynotes,
especially
cool.
B
A
J
I
I
The
talks
elections
committee
was
the
idea
behind
who
was
selected
was
that
they
are
people
who
are
seasoned
speakers
and,
from
my
experience
with
them,
have
helped
others
as
well.
With
talk
submissions,
I
think
that
being
able
to
tell
a
good
story
is
a
really
important
part
of
being
able
to
provide
a
great
talk
and
that
can
be
technical
or
non
technical
and
I
wanted
representation
from
different
parts
of
the
world
and
also
networks.
I
Yeah,
well,
that's
a
that's
a
good
question
too,
and
that's
yeah.
You
can
do
it.
We
could
do
something
like
you
know,
an
application
for
that
process
that
creates
more
process.
Oh
yes,
it's
been
running.
Other
conferences
is
also
that
you,
just
you
volunteer
yourself
and
say,
like
I,
want
to
do
this
thing
and
then,
hopefully
that
aligns
with
the
people
who
are
selecting
the
program's
committee.
I
Thank
you
yeah
yeah,
but
I
also
wanted
some
sense
of
neutrality
as
well.
I
know
it
can
be
really
tough
for
both
corporate
and
individual
members
worrying
about
representation
when
it
comes
to
the
speaking
slots,
and
I
love
having
a
committee
around
last
year.
We
didn't
have
that,
and
I
just
I
love
getting
those
perspectives
and
getting
a
more
balanced
content
about.
A
It
Tracy
we
do
have
a
question
from
the
the
YouTube,
the
YouTube
I.
Don't
know
why
I
said
like
that,
and
unfortunately,
I
can't
share
links
in
that
chat.
But
people
are
asking
for
the
certification
link
if
there's
like
any
sort
of
draft
of
the
curriculum
or
so
so.
Maybe
we
can
tweet
that
out
from
node
after
the
meeting
yeah.
I
B
Okay,
moving
along
so
people
put
together
a
collaboration
summit
in
Berlin.
It
was
really
great,
so
this
is
scheduled
for
slightly
before
j/s
coffee.
You,
anna,
has
helped
put
it
together,
along
with
I.
Think
Myles
has
helped
out
I've
been
coordinating
a
little
bit
just
with
the
coop,
the
the
venue
that
we're
looking
to
book
but
yeah.
We
need
an
allocation
just
for
a
very,
very
cheap
rental
fee,
for
the
collaboration
summit
to
happen
in
Berlin.
Any
questions
about
this.
F
A
Right,
not
exactly
I
I
guess
meant
code
temporal
yep,
whatever
yeah,
okay
cool.
Also
for
this
is
there
a
plan
to
have
it
to
be
more
organized
last
day
that
the
last
one
was
very
controversial.
Well,.
B
F
B
Yo,
which
is
huge,
yeah
I,
mean
they're.
There
I
think
that
they're
they're
talking
in
that
report,
you
can
look
at
the
at
the
thread,
but
the
the
community
of
people
that
are
organizing
it
are
talking
about.
You
know
what
we
might
do
to
you
know
bring
in
more
people
that
actually
are
only
working
on
nodejs
that
we
can
have
that
discussion
or
if
we
want
to
have
like
a
broader
discussion
and
who
to
try
to
reach
out
to
to
bring
in.
For
that.
There's.
A
B
A
A
B
B
Any
opposed
any
abstentions
passes:
okay,
the
new
GS
Ambassador
Program.
This
has
been
knocking
around
for
a
little
while,
but
essentially
it's
it's
an
allocation
of
money
so
that
we
can
send
some
swag
to
specific
events
that
foundation
targets
for
almost
like
professional
development.
I
guess
it
may
be
the
right
word,
but
some
of
the
events
in
verticals
that
we're
really
looking
going
after
like
containers
so
dr.
Khan,
is
actually
coming
up
really
soon.
B
B
So
it's
a
little
under
3,700
dollars
for
it
for
the
full
for
the
quote
so
I
round
it
up
a
little
bit
and
then
I'll
get
us
50,
shirts
and
100
stickers
that
we
can
send
it
to
five
different
events
this
year
and
the
other
for
we
haven't
exactly
allocated,
which
ones
that
those
will
be
yet.
But
we
want
to
have
the
option
available
and
I
believe.
H
A
B
Now
it's
it
exists
solely
inside
of
the
communications
and
marketing
team.
Right
now,
it's
like
it's
like
an
internal
thing
that
we're
doing
for
for
reaching
out
to
like
more
business
centric
events
that
are
in
verticals
that
we're
trying
to
target
it's,
not
a
it's
not
right.
Now,
a
developer,
centered
program,
deliver
targeted
program.
I
would
say
now.
I
We
can't
be
everywhere
as
a
team,
and
we
are
lucky
enough
that
many
of
our
corporate
members
are
already
going
to
be
at
these
events
that
are
also
useful
to
our
organization,
and
so
we
thought
it
would
be
nice
to
support
them
in
some
way
right
if
multiple
corporate
members
are
going
to
be
at
dr.,
Khan
or
they're
going
to
be
at
another
event
and
they're
asking
us
for
support
in
the
form
of
like
swag
and
stickers,
and
maybe
comms,
you
know
helping
out
with
promotion.
Oh
yeah.
A
A
I
I
agree:
I
think
that
this
yeah
this
is
definitely
an
experiment
that
was
accelerated
by
the
request
for
darker
con,
but
yeah
I
mean
it's
it's
a
much
and
the
community
stuff.
Is
it's
a
tough
question
because
there
are
so
many
great.
I
think
we've
had
this
discussion
before
with
the
community
committee
stuff
but
like
there
are
so
many
great
community
conferences
and
events,
and
it
would
be
awesome
to
be
able
to
support
them
with
things
like
swaggin
stickers,
but
the
process
around
and
the
money
involved
with
that
is
tough.
A
I
A
B
A
G
B
Any
post
any
abstaining
motion
passes
okay,
swag
store,
so
we've
talked
about
this
now
I
think
in
two
different
meetings,
but
essentially
we
really
want
to
get
off
of
the
old
store
and
into
this
new
swag
store
that
we
are
much
more
confident
in
and
we
actually
continue
to
waste
some
of
our
peoples,
time
kind
of
dealing
with
shipping
issues
and
all
kinds
of
stuff
in
the
old
swag
store.
B
B
A
G
B
C
Oh,
this
got
posted
with
a
lot
of
community
feedback
there
I
guess
handbook
was
kind
of
it
made.
It
seem
like
an
ongoing
place
to
go
reference
for
directors
and
it's
more
of
like
an
onboarding
guide.
So
there
was
a
proposal
to
just
change
that
name
and
a
couple
things
that
related
that
throughout
the
document,
but
otherwise
I
think
Seth
had
had
some
thoughts
on
it
as
well.
Sorry,
I,
garib,
set
and
so
I
didn't
know.
If
those
were
addressed
or
not,
I
didn't
want
to
leave
him
out.
J
Yeah,
I
think
the
William,
the
point
I
made
was
I
was
just
sort
of
you
know,
making
sure
that
stuff
that
we
had
discussed
earlier
was
also
going
to
converge.
There
were
a
couple
of
places
in
the
document
where
we
call
out
appropriate
time
frame,
and
you
know
it's
unclear
what
appropriate
means.
It's
not
something
I
think
we
should
block
on,
but
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
everybody
is
sort
of
aware
of
it,
that
you
know
we
leaving
it
as
a
gray
area.
C
And
then
we
should
have
that.
That
goes
more
into
those
details,
but
maybe
it
didn't
fall
and
quite
in
the
context
here
so
I
don't
know
right
make
them.
B
Okay,
so
we
need
to
get
a
different
document
in
to
get
approved
then,
so
we
can.
We
can
follow
up
an
email
to
that
with
that
I'll
follow
up
with
you.
William
I
had
a
very
hard
time
trying
to
track
down
what
the
latest
version
of
all
of
this
stuff
was.
So
I'll
coordinate
with
you
an
Andy
to
make
sure
that
we
have
the
right
one
and
we'll
send
it
out
for
an
email
resolution.
B
C
Alright,
so
yeah
since
we
last
spoke,
the
members
repo
was
renamed
to
board
cleaned
up
old
issues
and
hosted
our
contribution.
Pollitz
policy
pledge
the
readme
was
updated,
although,
admittedly
it
could
use
some
more
improvements.
Pr's
welcome
the
hand
book
was
published,
as
we
just
said,
and
I
published
all
public
meeting
minutes
to
date
in
markdown
format
there
and
in
that
process,
I
noticed
that
there
are
a
couple,
airs
may
be
there
with
misspellings
typing
things
like
that,
but
some
references
are
a
little
wrong.
C
C
C
I
was
than
normal,
so
I
thought
that
was
kind
of
interesting
and
then
again
I
kind
of
like
signals
from
the
community
and
take
note
of
it
and
if
they
need
help,
we
should
think
about
it
because,
apparently
it
I
would
say
that
there's
interest
in
HTTP
to
and
note
and
then
on
the
community
committee
side.
There
were
some
issues
that
were
closed
out
I'm,
the
tsc
repo
that
I
think
will
I've
started.
C
A
To
clarify,
there's
there's
a
big
question
of
whether
or
not
we
want
to
have
an
official
communication
channel
and
whether
it
should
be
IRC
slack,
and
it's
actually
been
very
difficult
to
get
a
good
community
feel
on
this
and
so
I
think
it's
one
of
the
issues
that
were
going
to
be
using
to
also
figure
out
process
in
trying
to
decide
things
within
the
community
in
general
and
Tracy.
I
just
want
to
give
her
a
shout
out
for
doing
a
lot
of
cat
wrangling
on
that
issue.
A
C
C
L
So
I
have
three
more
items
here:
I'm
just
quickly.
First
of
all,
tsc
membership
changes
just
to
update
the
boron
on
some
membership.
Changes
that
have
gone
on
James
Snell
was
moved
from
IBM
to
near
form.
So
it's
a
company
change
but
is
still
on
the
scene
to
the
tsc
Josh
gavotte
from
Microsoft
has
been
voted
on
to
the
tsc
he's
been
helping
out
for
a
while
now
and
so
we've
made
that
official
we
will
likely
bring
on
two
new
members
in
the
coming
weeks,
most
likely
next
week
as
we
vote
for
Michael
Dawson
IBM.
B
L
Anna
henningsen
these
two
have
been
participating
for
a
while
and
been
contributing.
So
we
make
that
official
as
well.
We've
had
resignations
from
Chris
Dickinson
of
NPM
and
Julian
gilly
of
joint
from
the
tsc.
Chris
is
also
resigned
from
the
ctc.
I
believe,
and
julian
is
still
on
the
ctc
node
version.
8
is
coming
out
in
a
month
just
to
just
an
FYI
and
you'll
note
that
we
are
dropping
the
V
from
when
we
say
V
ated
we
node
node
8,
just
because
of
the
confusion
with
v8.
L
So
this
is
only
for
the
end
of
the
end
of
April
and
that's
to
hit
a
version
of
try
and
hit
a
version
of
v8.
That's
coming
out,
then,
which
is
version
5.7
know,
is
that
5.8,
the
current
version
we've
got
in
node
7
is
5.5
and
isn't
that
there's
no
real
big
headline
changes
in
this.
So
it's
it's
kind
of
hard
to
build.
A
narrative
around
would
be
new
version
and
it's
a
similar
story
that
we
had
with
seven
as
well,
like
we're
being
a
stabilization
v8's,
not
bringing
any
huge
javascript
changes.
L
It's
just
there's
not
a
whole
lot
of
wiring.
This
unfortunately-
but
this
will
be-
this
will
go
on
to
be
our
LTS
version
in
October,
the
next
LTS
likely
will
be
codenamed
carbon,
so
node
82,
LTS
carbon
there's,
two
major
things
coming
in
this.
That
will
both
be
experimental.
The
Microsoft
and
IBM
particularly
have
been
working
on
this
thing
called
nappy
napi.
G
L
L
It'll
still
be
experimental
at
least
early
on,
and
it's
a
tracing
API
for
deep
inspection
to
the
asynchronous
process
within
node,
and
the
other
thing
to
note
about
node
version
8
is
that
we
will
likely
it
will
not
likely
believe
its
full
term.
We
might
have
to
rip
em,
pull
it
back
by
three
months
due
to
the
version
of
openssl
that
we
use
ceasing
it
LTS
cycle
early
familiar
than
we
would
want
to
go
to.
L
So
this
is
like
what
happened
with
node
version
0
12,
so
we
may
have
to
pull
it
back
to
the
end
of
2019,
rather
than
April
2020.
We'll
make
that
official,
though,
when
the
LTS
working
group
decides
on
how
to
handle
that,
but
that's
a
likelihood
and
and
finally
node
for
the
original
LTS
version.
Argon
is
moving
from
active
LTS
to
maintenance
on
the
first
of
April.
L
So
just
a
few
days
time,
and
that's
it's
still
going
to
be
supported
for
another
year,
but
this
is
when
the
updates
will
slow
down
and
things
focus
much
more
on
critical
updates.
So
critical
security
and
stability
updates
so
expect
that
one
just
stabilize
right
out,
but
it's
got
another
year
to
run
so
that's
updates
from
the
tsc
there.
Any
questions
about
those
items.
G
L
Believe
it's
going
to
be
ready,
it's
possible
that
it
could
be
boarding
as
an
experimental
during
the
LT
it
and
sorry
the
version
8
current
process-
that's
a
six
months
where
we
can
introduce
new
things
before
LTS.
So
we
don't
have
this
pressure
to
introduce
everything
in
one
go.
Only
breaking
changes,
HTTP
two
would
likely
not
be
brea
breaking
change,
so
we
could
introduce
that
during
that
six
month
period
got
it.
Thank
you,
unfortunately,
right
now
we
actually
we're
in
a
bit
of
a
crunch
to
get
this
out.
L
The
branch
has
been
cut
and
we're
trying
to
stabilize
the
breaking
changes
that
got
into
that
branch,
but
we
have
a
couple
of
very
large
pull
request
to
review
to
get
in.
So
there's
a
bit
of
a
time
crunch
here,
so
I
I
doubt
anything
else.
Major
is
going
to
get
out
before
this
is
launching,
but
if
anyone
wants
to
have
a
looked
in
that
version
8
its
v8
X
is
the
name
of
the
branch
and
that's
that's
already
been
cut.
If
people
wanna
have
a
look
at
what's
in
there
and
what's
different
and.
C
L
We
do
have
some
redundancy
on
the
outside
there's
multiple
ways
of
dealing
with
it.
With
this,
with
this
move,
we
actually
had
the
critical
components
of
it
available
the
full
time,
so
we
made
sure
that
the
parts
that
we
used
for
release
builds
were
always
available.
We
didn't
take
them
down,
so
we
just
put
that
on
a
temporary
internet
connection
and
it
was
available.
L
Some
of
the
arm
resources
are
in
the
cloud
already
so
v7,
for
example,
is
in
the
cloud
and
the
other
option
that
we've
used
in
the
past,
where
we've
had
trouble
with
build
times
and
whatnot,
is
to
simply
delay
the
release
of
our
binary.
So
they
don't
actually
stop
us
from
getting
releases
out.
So
sometimes,
though
they
did,
we
just
delay
the
binaries
getting
out
and
that
we
listed
on
the
release
page,
it
says,
with
binary,
will
be
available
soon
for
v7v
people,
whatever
ok.
C
L
Because
I
don't
stop
our
releases
going
out
in
general,
because
I'm
is
not
as
heavily
used
as
the
others.
We
might
raise
this
with
a
build
working
group
meeting.
I
think
it's
coming
up
tomorrow
and
we
can
talk
about
that.
The
more
critical
thing
is
we're
at
a
bit
of
a
an
awkward
point
without
mac
OS
resources.
Right
now.
We
that's
that's
in
a
much
more
precarious
state
than
arm
right
now,
so
we
may,
we
may
be
forced
to
come
to
the
foundation
for
some
resources
for
that,
if
we
can't
sort
it
up.
Yes,.
C
The
Mac
resources,
so
the
februari
meeting
for
the
bill
working
group.
They
there
was
probably
about
a
half
hour
discussion
about
the
bus
factor
and
they
expressed
pretty
good
concern
that
the
bus
sectors
is
not
it's
chilling
as
the
actual
words
they
use
and
so
I'm
wondering.
If
we
should
set
aside
some
funds
or
can
we
do
PR
or
events
or
something
is
it
is
bill
giving
enough
attention?
Can
we
help
them
out?
I.
L
B
C
And
another
interesting
thing
I
wanted
to
plan
from
that
meeting.
They
said
the
only
person
that
they've
brought
on
recently
was
actually
a
result
of
not
interactive
europe,
and
I
know
you
know
we're
kind
of
always
back
and
forth
on
how
Europe
all
was
and
whether
it
was
a
good
turnout.
But
if
we
get
there,
one
person
alone
added
to
build,
makes
me
happy.
I
just
wanted
to
say
that.
A
Except
for
that
link
which
got
handled
there
is
nothing
at
the
moment.
I
will
ask
one
more
time
for
any
more
questions.
A
One
thing,
I
we'll
say
is
a
lot
of
the
people
were
reporting
where
they
were
joining
us
from,
and
there
was
someone
from
Venezuela
and
gosh
where's,
the
other
one
yeah.
There
was
a
bunch
of
someone
from
Colombia
so
like
actually
like
a
cool
international
audience
so
like
that
was
awesome.
C
H
L
L
A
L
A
People
who
don't
know
you
couldn't
install
node
from
the
link
on
the
website
for
a
bit
because
of
a
digital
ocean
outage,
and
the
key
part
of
this
outage
was
that
that's
what
Travis
uses
for
people
who
do
continuous
integration,
so
I
would
say
that
I
would
anticipate
that
it
was
like
at
least
relatively
high,
given
that
I
assume
we
have
lots
of
people
building
stuff
on
Travis.
We
use
node
yeah.
L
Yeah
the
like
that
there
was
a
luckily
impact
that
we
don't
you
see
as
well,
because
you
know
it's
it's
it's
you
know
corporate
users
doing
production
deploys
would
also
have
been
impacted
if
they
were
grabbing
the
source
from
the
same
place
and
we
and
we
wouldn't
have
heard
them
as
locally
as
we
heard
we
would.
We
heard
the
open
source
be
custom.
A
For
sure
I
was
just
saying,
I
would
estimate
that
open
source
impact
was
pretty
high,
who
owns
like
the
ops
around
that?
Is
it
the
build
team?
Yeah,
okay,
just
cuz
I'm,
pretty
sure
I
I
feel
like
that,
may
have
been
a
planned
outage,
but
anyways.
We
should
just
be
sure
that
that
gets
taken
care
of
it.
B
One
question
so
I
mean
we're
behind
a
CDN
and
most
of
those
build
resorts
never
get
updated.
Could
we
tell
the
CDN
to
cash
them
in
definitely
next
time.
L
Yes,
that's
that's
been
the
the
story
here
is
that
is
that
any
caching,
whether
we
do
with
the
binary
resources
we
lose
all
metrics
for
them,
and
so
we've
prioritized
metrics
at
the
moment
and
I've
been
trying
to
get
cloudflare
to
to
give
us
logs
for
them,
but
that's
an
enterprise
feature
which
is
really
expensive
and
we're
on
a
free
plane.
So
that's
a
sort
of
an
ongoing
background
discussion
back
so
that
we
can
turn
that
on
the
full
caching
and
get
the
actual
logs
directly
from
cradley.
B
B
G
B
G
A
Somebody
did
when
they
heard
me
talking
about
the
locations
a
couple
more
people
mentioned
where
they
were
from,
and
we
have
someone
also
from
Sweden
and
someone
from
Bangalore.
So
pretty
pretty
awesome,
turnout,
I'd,
say
very
cool,
but
otherwise
it
does.
Someone
wanted
details
about
the
arm
cluster,
which
I'm
going
to
make
the
executive
call
that
that
might
be
a
bit
out
of
scope,
but
you
can
follow
up
with
the
built-in
yeah.