►
From YouTube: Node.js Community Committee Meeting
Description
A
So
and
we
our
lives,
so
thanks
a
lot
for
coming
to
another
nodejs
community
committee
meeting.
Today
we
have
things
on
the
agenda.
We
have
a
pretty
large
agenda.
We
will
also
be
having
a
group
video
in
the
background.
We
will
be
having
a
15-minute
private
session
at
the
end
of
the
meeting,
so
we'll
probably
end
at
about
12:45
and
with
that
I
think
we
can
get
started
in
updates.
Around
initiatives
soared,
so
anyone
have
an
initial
updates
from
the
Supes
they
are
participating.
It.
B
C
C
Will
be
facilitating,
we
will
be
doing
not
our
usual
time
on
Friday
9:00
a.m.
Pacific
is
our
usual
time
on
Friday.
Instead,
what
will
be
at
9:00
a.m.
Pacific
noon,
eastern
on
Thursday,
August
16th?
So
if
you're
in
an
enterprise
context,
we
gotta
be
I,
got
LinkedIn
got
a
bunch
of
folks
here
that
are
quite
enterprise
e
note
source.
C
You
know
I'd
love
to
have
your
participation
and
you
know
great
if
you
could
join,
and
that
applies
equally
to
us
as
members
representatives
of
the
no
just
project
as
calm,
calm
members.
You
know
you
know,
listening
to
the
feedback
and
you're
helping
facilitate
taking
it
back
to
the
project,
and
you
know
Tom
comment.
Esc
are
very
much
invited
so
yeah,
that's
the
big
news
there.
A
C
C
C
Ahmed
on
the
comm
come
so
that's
been
a
nice
and
yeah
so
yeah
we
have
our
kickoff
meetings.
If
you're
interested
in
sort
of
following
along
at
home
folks
are
posting
to
the
mentor
mentee
pairs
are
posting
their
notes
to
get
up
issues
and
also
going
to
be
posting
to
their
their
personal
YouTube
accounts.
The
video
recording
of
our
mentorship
chef
sessions
to
you
know
share
those
with
whomever
may
be
interested.
So
you
know
we
aren't
posting
those
too.
C
You
know
the
foundation
official
accounts
because,
mostly
because
of
logistics,
the
you
know
the
pairing
groups,
don't
necessarily
have
privileges
to
be
able
to
go
and
do
this
and
we
wanted
to
enable
folks
to
you
know,
to
go
and
run
those
independently.
So
we
realigned
around
you
know,
let's
you
know,
share
those
publicly
and
sort
of
model.
After
the
you
know,
no
just
project
practices,
but
you
know
we'll
only
link
from
our
github
issues
to
those.
A
A
Actually
there
were
two
other
individuals
was
that
they
could
go
and
request
the
funding
from
the
Foundation
Board
or
they
could
have
the
travel
fund
and
I
immediately
said
no
to
the
travel
fund,
because
that
doesn't
make
any
sense.
In
my
opinion,
although
you
know,
if
that's
something
y'all
would
be
interested
in,
we
could
go
down
that
path.
To
me
that
doesn't
make
sense.
So
yeah
I
just
wanted
to
put
that
out
there
and
kind
of
have
that
discussion.
A
C
A
D
From
having
like
we,
we
had
a
better
practice
of
like
separate
proposals
from
various
things
that
were
happening
within
the
side
for
requests
to
the
board,
but
it
ended
up
becoming,
like
so
line
by
line
item,
that
it
was
I,
think
painful
for
them
to
operate
where
they
could
just
lump
it
up
into
like
a
community
bucket.
That
said,
my
understanding,
though
I,
would
have
to
check
on
it.
A
D
I
mean
it's
check
as
far
as
I
recall
on
this,
the
events
group
is
actually
a
separate
group
funding
wise
and
budget
wise,
so
we
actually
paid
that
so
it's
them
just
giving
away
money
because
of
the
budgets
that
they've
allocated
so
I
think
it's
that
node
hat
would
have
to
like
allocate
money
as
part
of
our
work.
You
know
or
jaspe.
You
know
foundation
for
folks
if
they
wanted
to
do
that.
I'm.
The
events
group
that
is
managing
the
budget
for
that
whole
thing.
F
D
Significant
cost,
like
just
from
an
events
running
perspective,
regardless
of
whether
it
is
our
event,
there
is
still
significant
cost
per
person
and
who
attends
the
event
just
because
of
the
overhead
of
the
event.
So,
like
you
know,
this
is
absolutely
not.
The
number
I
have
no
insight
into
the
numbers,
but
just
when
you're
charging
for
a
ticket,
you
could
say
you
know
three-quarters
of
what
you're
paying
is
pure
cost
of
running
the
event,
and
so
that
is
essentially
them
paying
us.
A
And
so
you
know,
I
can
give
you
the
number
that
they,
they
told
me,
which
was
fifty
five
hundred
for
that
for
the
ten
so
yeah
like
I,
like
I,
said
my
original
understanding
in
a
tent
came
from
a
very
different
perspective,
the
background
of
the
processes
around
this
so
yeah.
That
was
you
know
something
that
came
from
this,
but
I
very
strongly
agree
that
this
isn't
in
the
scope
of
the
travel
fund
at
all.
I
was
very
heavily
assured
that
it
wouldn't
be
an
issue
to
go.
A
D
We
just
need
to
you
know,
email,
you
know
Mike
and
Chris
that
this
needs
to
be
on
the
next
court.
Yeah
anyways
I.
Think
the
big
thing
here
is:
we
need
to
file
an
issue
or
in
a
PR
so
that
it's
like
quantified,
because
I
would
assume
this
needs
to
be
in
the
admin
repo
for
both
Kham
Kham
and
the
TSE
cool
right.
E
Think
we
may
have
asked
that,
but
I
and
I
think
there's
already
something
in
place
to
cover
the
tickets
for
the
people
who
are
gonna,
be
getting
money
through
the
travel
fund.
So
this
is
separate
like
this.
I
guess
is.
Tierney
is
like
non
collaborators
who
you
know
you
think
are
important
to
to
come
or
who
have
come
in
the
past,
but
won't
be
coming
this
year,
because
the
branding.
A
C
D
D
C
G
C
A
Yeah,
and
so
that
is,
you
know
that
was
my
original
intent
with
this
was
to
actually
discuss
at
the
Congo
and
work
on
work
with
the
group
to
figure
out.
You
know
what
criteria
we
want.
What
who
we
want
to
give
them
to
things
like
that,
you
know,
is
the
local
node
school,
which
I
know
Manila
is
very
involved
with?
Is
there
anyone
specifically
from
underrepresented
minority
there?
Who
would
be
interested-
and
you
know
other
things
around-
that
other
individuals
who
would
be
interested
and
have
us
to
find
that.
D
We
just
need
I
would
say
like
mid
next
week
because
we
tend
to
wait
since
we
haven't
gotten
the
date
for
the
board
meeting.
I'm
gonna
assume
it's
not
next
Monday,
because
no
one
can
attend
that
quickly.
But
if
we
aim
for
next
Wednesday
for
having
a
number,
then
I
can
or
William
and
I
can
get
it
to
Mike
for
the
agenda
cuz,
we
have
to
make
sure
to
be
able
to
surface
those
proposals
ahead
of
the
meeting
cool.
A
I
will
begin
working
on
that
I'll.
Take
that
action
item
today,
I
just
realized
gem
said
they
weren't
gonna
be
able
to
attend
a
suit,
we're
on
notes.
Someone
anomalous
Narwhal
was
working
on
it
a
bit.
So
thank
you
for
whoever
started.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
beginning
to
start
on
that.
I
realized
how
Reliance
one
side
gem
disappearing
so
make
sure
to
shut
up
gem
for
that
thanks
quite
a
bit
for
being
so
consistent
and.
A
A
A
Real
quick
I
did
a
few
strum
and
you
know
a
few
quick
suggestions
there,
but
you
know
please
don't
hesitate
to
either
edit
that
that
first
post
or
with
you
know
additional
suggestions
or
add
your
suggestions
in
the
comments
and
I
will
add
them
on
as
well
so
yeah
that
I've
also
discussed
the
individual
membership
program
a
bit.
It's
legally
lady
leet
she's
expressed
an
interest
in
working
on
it
as
much
as
she
can.
A
C
B
D
C
C
I'm
still
yeah
I
would
be
happy
to
to
volunteer
if
we
need.
You
know
someone
to
go.
Do
that
I've
been
you
know,
I
have
that
carve
time
carve
out
on
my
calendar
and
I've
been
chasing
it
after
the
calendar,
invite
whenever
it
shows
up.
So
you
know
I'm
very
common,
unfortunately,
and
there's
on
my
calendar
I'm
there.
A
C
A
A
B
Manila's
in
a
loud
place,
but
he
had
posted
in
the
chat,
an
update
on
website
redesign
for
consecration.
We
have
a
list
of
potential
guides
that
we're
considering
and
still
organizing
or
I
a
it's
issue
number
60
in
the
website.
Redesign
refill
and
we've
committed
to
the
repo
a
an
Rx
document
for
if
you
want
to
open
up
a
PR
and
contribute
some
getting
started
guides
we're
also
yeah
we're
also
in
in.
B
B
Yeah,
so
if
you
want,
you
can
open
up
a
pull
request
using
that
template
into
the
documentation.
Folder
we're
gonna
be
keeping
getting
started
guides
there
until
we
have
a
proper
place
for
a
cliff.
You
can
draw
from
getting
started
ideas
from
issue
number
60
and
we're
also
working
to
identify
three
to
five
people
to
contribute
the
first
foundation
of
documents.
So,
if
you're
interested
in
working
with
us
to
develop
what
this
looks
like
and
and
feel
like,
you
have
a
area
of
specialty
where
you
would
be
great
to
contribute
another.
B
A
specific
topic
for
getting
started
with
node
come
talk
to
us.
We'd
love
the
contribution.
We
also
had
an
old
site
redesign
side.
We
had
continued
great
chats
with
our
designer
on
loan
from
stripe.
Joey
who's
been
kicking
butt
on
iterating
on
on
what
the
site
should
look
like.
I
he's,
keeping
we're
keepin
cards
close
to
our
chest
right
now
for
actual
design,
because
that
committee
is
never
fun.
I
want
to
give
Joey
the
time
to
cultivate
exactly
what
he.
C
A
I,
are
you
talking
about
I
can't
recall
the
issue
you're
talking
about,
but
I
think
I
think
I
understand
the
context
and
that
was
more
getting
started
in
the
org
and
contributing
the
project.
The
content
that
we're
actually
looking
for
for
the
site
is
more
getting
start
with
nodejs,
and
then
you
know
going
beyond
that
and
by
node
is
I
mean
as
a
platform,
not
you
know
as
contributing,
although
there's
probably
space
for
that
I.
A
C
Right
I
mean
we
may
want
to
consider
at
Lee.
At
the
very
least
you
know,
since
you
know
folks
know
looking
for
getting
started,
you
know
could
could
mean
both.
You
know
linking
you
know
from
the
getting
started
with
you
know,
contributing
contents
to
a
like.
If
you're
looking
to
get
involved,
you
know
check
out
this
other
guy.
B
There's
a
hole
as
of
yet
unplanned
section
of
the
site
with
the
label
community,
so
presumably
getting
started
in
the
community,
including
getting
started
with
Kham,
Kham,
CSC
and
and
all
the
working
groups
would
live
under
there.
However,
nobody
as
of
yet
has
given
a
whole
lot
of
thought,
let's
do
the
structure
or
content
that
goes
under
there.
So
if
someone
wants
to
take
a
stab
at
that
by
all
means
run
with
it,
because
that's
ironically,
this
emerged
from
the
community
committee,
but
the
community
page
is
completely
a
blank
page
right
now.
B
B
We
really
need
to
have
a
come
up
with
a
better
way
of
explaining
how
all
this
operates
like
it
took.
I
know
when
I
first
joined
it
took
it
took
weeks
to
figure
out
exactly
what
the
structure
org
structure
was
all
like,
because
it's
not
explained
it's
just
all
called
you
know
had
my
knowledge,
how
that's
connected
for
the
most
part,
yeah
synthesizing,
that
and
and
surfacing
that's
people.
It
should
be
the
priority
that
community
section
I,
think
great,
so
yeah,
that's
website
redesign
awesome.
B
A
And
the
meeting
for
today
so
first
item
on
the
agenda
is
first
pass
at
our
communities
and
be
this
is
a
PR
I
opened
up
trying
to
kind
of
pick
a
stab
at
what
this
stop
of
this
concept
that
we
discussed
in
the
past,
like
I,
think
eight
or
nine
months
ago
would
be
like,
and
it
was
more
of
a
not
even
we
as
in
calm
calm,
but
we,
as
in
the
admin
group
specifically
around
you
know
adding
node,
slackers
and
say
unofficial
official
partner
community
type
thing.
A
C
A
I
wanted
to
take
a
stab
at
kind
of
going
through
in
defining
this.
The
last
comments
I
saw
about
the
contents
specifically
were
I.
Think
no,
no,
that
was
on
another
car
yeah,
so
there's
been
one
individual
who's
been
super
active
in
this
thread.
He
runs
or
they
run
two
different
notice.
There
are
two
different
discord
servers
and
are
interested
in
having
you
know
their
notice.
A
A
So
yeah,
you
know
they're
interested,
although
they
are
you
know
expressing
some
interesting
commentary
around.
You
know,
what's
been
laid
out
so
I'm
going
to
try
to
address
that
and
trying
to
understand,
so
we
can
kind
of
come
to
a
more
mutual
understanding
there,
but
yeah
mostly
it's
probably
around
the
kind
of
pending
things,
are
around
rephrasing
some
of
the
content
in
there
and
or
you
know,
working
to
to
make
it
a
little
bit
more
clear.
E
This
guy's
say
I
mean
I,
guess
the
key
issue.
There
is
the
requests
that
we
have.
It
means
as
part
of
the
like,
as
part
of
you
know,
be
becoming
official
in
the
past.
We've
asked
for
and
gotten
basically
like
you
know,
admin
access
so
that
we
could
help
with
moderation
that
thus
I
guess
just
this
seems
to
be.
The
main
concern
is
that
that
request
so
I,
don't
know
I
just
say
that
you
know
to
put
people
in
people's
minds
to
think
about
that
and
maybe
comment
in
the
issue
in
terms
of
well.
D
I
think
for
me
reading
this
PR,
because
it
is
very
slim
and
just
like
establishing
that
group,
but
then
also
reading
more
in
to
the
issue
326,
which
is
the
begin
documenting
the
partner
communities.
It's
really
good
discussion
and
I
know
that
this,
oh
this
in
and
of
itself,
is
like
so
many
hours
of
discussion.
I
think
we've
all
had
I
mean
trying
to
figure
out
how
we,
how
we
support
these
awesome
communities
out
in
the
world
in
our
ecosystem.
D
The
it's
interesting
because
there's
there's
like
what
I
would
like
to
see
is
more
of
a
discussion
around
expected
outcomes
so
like.
If
what
does
it
mean
to
be
a
partner
community
right?
We're
asking
that
question
and
I
think
that's
a
good
and
like
what
does
it?
What
does
it
take
to
become
a
partner
community
but,
like
I,
think
it's
important
to
discuss
what
the
expected
outcome
is
and
whether
we
can
satisfy
that
with
what
the
partner
communities
is
trying
to
be
is
something
that
I
talk
about.
A
lot
is
scope.
D
We
can't
cover
all
of
the
awesome
meetups
and
events
and
online
communities
that
are
happening
in
the
world
related
to
node.
So
it's
definitely
like
how
can
like
what?
What
do
folks
want?
That
would
want
to
be
a
partner
community
and-
and
we
have
to
sort
of
come
up
with
that
I
would
love
to
hear
more
communities.
Give
that
input
I.
D
A
And
I
guess
my
understanding
of
her
I
guess:
I
didn't
codify
this,
which
I
probably
should
have
ethics
I
had
in
my
head.
That
I
assumed
was
understood
from
the
PR.
Was
that
like
to
actually
be
a
partner
community?
You
have
to
be
listed
as
a
partner's
community.
That
kind
of
thing
is
like
there
is
a
list
in
there
of
partner
communities
the
first
one
being
note
slackers,
because
they
follow
the
criteria
that
I've
built
out
and
to
my
understanding,
they're
kind
of
in
the
first
case
of
it.
A
D
So,
like
I
find
the
slack
that
notes
lack
to
be
sort
of
an
anomaly.
That's
my
I
think
that
part
of
my
concern
here
is
that
I
feel
like
partner
community
may
mean
different
things,
different
people,
and
it
does
not
scale
partner
communities
in
that
definition
does
not
scale
well,
as
Michael
was
expressing
with
the
admin
issue
so
yeah.
That's
why
I
would
like
I'm
yeah,
but
I
want
to
make
sure
we're
not
holding
people
up
on
this
like.
How
can
we
best
help
you
without
like
having
the
burden
of
our
governance?
B
I
also
I,
don't
know
how
exactly
how
bureaucratic
we
want
to
get
with
this,
but
have
a
code
of
conduct
have
in
moderation.
Policy
are
very
loose
requirements
if
the
moderation
policy
is
I'm,
the
dictator
I
can
delete
whatever
and
there's
no
course,
for
you
know
up
leveling
complaints.
If
moderation
team
goes
out
of
control
in
this
little
community,
that's
not
great!
B
E
G
B
E
C
C
You
know
any
an
intent
to
to
achieve
partner
status
and
you
know
then
we
could,
you
know,
go
down
and
basically
say
alright,
you
know
have
have
they
do
they
have
a
you
know,
code
of
conduct
is
there
you
know
an
official
representative
of
the
no
just
project,
that's
providing
that
connective
tissue.
You
know
back
and
forth,
and
then
you
know
after
some
baking
we
could
make
the
determination.
Yet
yes
or
no,
you
know
this
is
this
is
a
part
in
our
community
yeah.
D
You
know
I'm
thinking
about
this
another
way
of
like
us
trying
this
I
know.
All
of
this
will
keep
people
from
being
a
part
of
it.
So
what
if
we
took
like
a
sort
of
mixed
approach,
which
is
liberal,
more
liberal
on
the
trusting
of
like
you
say
that
you're
following
the
node
code
of
conduct
you're
doing
these
things?
D
We
also
make
sure
that
we,
like
I,
think
William
and
Dan
you'd,
probably
be
able
to
help
me
speak
most
of
this
or
like
understand
whether
I
need
to
ask
the
board
about
this,
like
where
we
would
need
official
language.
In
this
saying
like
by
saying
we
are
a
partner
community.
You
are
not
an
official
entity
and
property
of
a
node
foundation
or
a
node
project
right
and
at
any
time
we
can
revoke
the
status
as
a
partner
community.
D
F
The
board
money,
how
it's,
how
these
trees
are
related
to
associated
members,
I
believe,
is
what
is
called
there.
There
is
in
the
bylaws
there
are
associated
members,
I
think
it
was
and
to
be
open
to
like
I
can't
even
think,
but
we
don't
have
any
of
them,
which
is
similar
to
how
we
have
individual
members
and
corporate
members.
There
is
the
there
was.
There
is
a
concept
of
associating
members,
so
they
probably
want.
D
F
D
C
So
I
think
there's
some
really
important
political
things
that
you're
managing
on
our
behalf
right
now
and
I.
Don't
necessarily
see
this
as
high
priority.
If
you
see
any
political
risk,
I
would
advocate
for
you
know
deferring
you
know
that
asked
until
we
sort
of
get
past
the
bigger
rocks
that
we're
working
on.
A
A
A
E
So
teams
come
together.
They
put
together
sort
of
a
proof
of
concept,
and
then
you
know
for
the
successful
teams.
There
is
potential
to
become
like
an
official
linux
project
and
or
and
funding
and
stuff
like
that,
so
that
the
core
thing
here
is
that
you
know
it's
it's
a
way
to
get
people
involved
in
sort
of
a
you
know,
a
project
which
would
be
for
the
greater
good
I
think
that
kind
of
fits
with
you
know
some
of
the
sort
of
the
greater
good
feeling
we
see
across
the
nodejs
community.
E
So
one
of
the
things
I
thought
of
is:
we
could
offer
a
dedicated
session
for
the
nodejs
community
in
terms
of
introducing
the
project
and
getting
people
ramped
up
and
then
even
maybe
some
help
in
terms
of
matching
teams
if
people
are
interested.
So
that's
what
I've
you
know
covered
in
that
issue,
and
you
know
my
hope
is.
We
can
sort
of
promote
a
little
bit
and
you
know
help
out
the
people
who
are
interested
in
getting
involved
a.
C
Recommendation
see
lots
of
IBM
in
that
and
you
know,
and
in
both
you
know
the
IBM.
You
know
specialized
page
and
the
overall
page
be
nice
to
get
some.
You
know
non
supporting
organizations,
you
know
in
involved
there.
So
you
know
having
you
know
another
corporation
or
you
know
several
other
corporations
engaged
in
that
I
think
would
make
it
easier
for
all
of
us
to
put
our
weight
behind
it.
Sure.