►
From YouTube: Node.js Community Committee Meeting
A
And
we're
life
awesome.
So
thanks
everyone
for
coming
to
another
nodejs
community
committee
meeting.
We,
let
me
make
sure
I,
don't
echo
myself
up
as
I
go.
We
have
a
rather
full
agenda
today
and
we
will
also
be
hearing
from
the
node
foundation
on
Jason
or
active
updates,
so
we're
sorry,
node
plus
J
interactive
updates,
so
we
will
get
started
and
I'm
want
to
warn
everyone
that
we're
gonna
be
timeboxing
pretty
heavily
today.
B
Got
one
for
internationalization
quickly
just
give
an
update.
We
have
translations
going
in
a
few
languages,
Italian
Spanish
French,
and
we're
seeing
translation
that
mostly
the
API
Docs
and
the
org
guides,
like
contributing
maintenance
tests.
Writing
style
guides
that
kind
of
stuff
we're
seeing
a
lot
of
interest
and
people
wanted
to
join,
assist
with
new
languages,
and
we
need
to
start
focusing
on
our
most
needed
languages
and
getting
momentum
primarily
Chinese
and
getting
translation
support.
They're
awesome.
C
C
So
I'm
not
so
interested
in
me
looking
at
them,
but
I'm
more
interested
in
making
sure
like
the
project,
knows
they're
starting
to
be
there
and
can
we
make
them
visible
so
that
it's
not
like
hey
the
collaboration,
wait
a
sec,
you
translated
them.
We
would
have
commented
or
whatever
it's
sort
of
like
if
we're
making
progress,
I
think
having
them
actually
consumable
somewhere.
Even
if
they're
not
complete
right
is
read.
C
B
B
C
Sounds
good
so
yeah
if
you
need
any
help
like
in
terms
in
terms
of
making
the
collaborator
base,
know
they're
there
or
whatever.
Just
let
me
know,
but
awesome
yeah
sounds
good
that
we're
it's.
It's
really
good
that
we're
at
the
point.
Where
there's
you
know,
we've
got
stuff
there
and
I
think
it's
something
we
can
really
promote
in
terms
of
like
K
we've
we've
come,
you
know
internationally
I
think
it's
a
really
good
message
to
be
promoting
absolutely.
F
You
know
interaction
through
user
feedback,
engaging
the
trolling
community
so
that
that
you
know
this
is
really
nice
success,
and
you
know
in
that
bone
skull,
Christopher
Hiller
is
you
know,
taking
on
tooling
as
a
special
focus
and
so
to
be
sort
of
spanning
that
that
team
role
around
that
you
know
in
line
with
that,
we
we
also
this
past
week
had
a
Enterprise
focus
and
Ahmed
Nazari
of
Telus
is
taking
on
that
and
beginning
to
lead.
That,
and
you
know
in
particular,
Achmed
is
look
four
ways
that
enterprise
organizations
can
integrate,
integrate.
F
You
know
kind
of
forward-looking
releases.
You
know
your
your
your
your
current
releases
into
Enterprise,
CI,
CD,
so
data
and
so
we're
getting
testing
on.
You
know
not
the
LTS,
which
is
what
the
enterprise
folks
are
going
to
be
using
and
actually
deploying
on,
but
you
know
getting
visibility
into
sort
of
pre.
You
know
before
the
things
come
down
the
pipe
and
before
things
go
into
a
production
release
integrating
there.
So
it's
really
exciting
to
to
see
you
know
some.
Some
subgroups
and
team's
grow
up
in
inside
of
user
feedback.
I'll,
stop
any
comments.
I.
F
Our
new,
you
know,
calm,
calm,
pattern
of
elevating
folks
and
promoting
folks
through
working
groups
and
initiatives.
You
know
awkward
is
joining
the
the
user
feedback
team
and
through
that
has
become
a
noches
project
member.
So
it's
tough,
then
on
mentorship
were
you
know
winding
our
way
towards
the
the
conclusion
of
our
first
cohort.
We
did
a
kind
of
alpha
cohort
where
we're
only
running
a
month
just
to
go
through
an
entire
cycle,
and
you
know
make
sure
that
we,
you
know,
have
enough
context
to
help
folks.
F
You
know
next
next
iteration
we're
planning
on
doing
a
three-month
cohort
and
what
we
you
know
as
design
mentorship
is
to
use
designed
to
run
at
a
six-month
cart.
So
I'm
glad
Rich's
here,
observing
you
know
now
is
a
great
time
to
to
get
involved
with
the
mentorship
program.
It's
you
know
a
a
few
hours
a
month
of
helping
folks
we're
looking
for
specific
scopes
where
you're
passionate
about-
and
you
know
the
mentorship
team
will
do
the
the
matching
of
you're
helping
a
line.
F
Your
folks
with
that
are
interested
in
those
areas,
and
you
know
by
helping
mentor
somebody.
You
know
you
are
directly
empowering
and
enabling
you
know
more
people
to
get
involved
in
the
project
and
you
know
reducing
the
burden
on
on
yourself,
so
I
hope
you'll
consider
you
know
joining
either
in
the
next
cohort
or
you
know,
if
you,
if
you
miss
this
cohort,
then
we'll
be
back
at
the
end
of
the
year,
kicking
off
the
first
six
month
cord.
What.
C
Some
things
in
larger
group,
but
I
wondered
I'm,
just
wondering
out
loud
if,
if
like
for
that
group
scheduling
some
larger
group,
like
you
know
maybe
groups
of
say
twenty
a
one
hour
just
like
how
you
get
involved
in
the
nodejs
project,
because
you
know
I've
had
people
reach
out
to
me
one-on-one
and
say:
hey,
you
know
how
would
I
get
involved
so
I've
just
gone
into
the
phone
with
them
for
an
hour,
and
you
know
you
go
through
that
talk
about
our
recommendations.
Some
people
are,
like
you
know,
we'll
reach
out.
C
Other
people
will
probably
just
wait
until
you
know
there's
something
else
that
that
large
group
has
shown
interest
and
I
know
it's.
You
know
we
don't
have
enough
mentors
to
say
here's
your
one-on-one,
just
thinking
that
might
be
like
something
we
could
do
in
the
shorter
term,
where
you
could
say
we'll
have
a
number
of
these
one-hour
sessions
for
a
larger
group
and
yeah.
It's
not
what
we
want
to
do,
we'll
still
work
towards
having
the
mentors
and
everything
but
it'd
be
better
than
just
leaving
them
with
nothing.
F
F
You
know
that
that
seems
to
be
directed
a
little
bit
more
towards
the
the
mentee
side
and
our
biggest
challenge
is
empowering
and
finding
mentors,
because
we
have
you
know
a
backlog
of
like
500
mentees
and
you
know
all
of
about.
You
know
10
mentors.
So
we
really
love
to
increase
the
the
mentor
side
of
the
equation.
Just
so
we
can,
you
know,
really
help
the
rest
of
the
group.
C
You
might
find
so
anyway.
I
won't
be
able
to
make
the
meeting
tomorrow
because
ok
I'm
booked
at
that
time,
but
got
it.
The
last
thing
I'll
say
is
you
might
find
mentors
who
are
willing
to
do
just
that
versus
being
a
full
mentor,
because
there's
a
different
level
of
commitment
right
got
it.
So
that's.
E
D
Quick
one
from
dark
side
of
men
website
redesign
some
pull
requests
are
starting
to
come
in
for
getting
started
guides,
which
is
great
they're,
very
much
works
in
progress.
So
if
anyone
has
has
time
to
go
past
them
and
see,
if
that's
something
that
they
have
experience,
would
they
can
very
well
make
suggestions
and
I
think
that
the
intent
is
for
that
to
be
collaborative
effort?
So
just
try.
A
A
Awesome
so
with
that
any
other
initiative
updates
no
cool,
we're
going
to
move
on
to
the
agenda
items.
I'm
gonna
transcribe,
try
to
time
boxey's
to
like
five
minutes
each
just
because
we're
so
low
on
time
today.
So
first
item
on
the
agenda
is
Jane,
Jas,
interactive
and
OTT
corner
I'm.
Actually,
gonna
move
that
to
the
last
item.
So
we
can
use
the
remaining
time
for
the
jsf
people
who
are
here
to
you
know,
engage
with
us
and
maybe
have
a
little
bit
extra,
then
a
little
bit
more
than
five
minutes.
A
There
is
currently
an
issue
issues
three
six
three
that
has
you
know
that
Tracy
went
through
created
and
has
a
four
minute
that
you
can
submit
anonymously.
As
a
self
domination
been
made
a
very
good
comment
that
it
was
a
self
nomination,
not
a
nomination,
because
it's
quite
a
bit
of
work
to
put
on
something
else,
and
you
don't
want
to
nominate
someone
for
something
that
they
may
or
may
not
be
able
to
handle
or
like
in
a
sense
of
time,
not
ability.
A
So
I
also
noted
that
I
would
not
be
rerunning
this
year.
I
do
think
that
it's
pretty
vital
that
we
have
you
know
a
change
in
leadership
and
kind
of
follow
that
healthy
path
and
kind
of
set
a
precedent
for
doing
that.
So
I,
you
know
in
that
issue,
not
document
I
went
through
an
outline
kind
of
a
lot
of
my
experience
and
some
of
the
things
that
I
think
others
can
expect
in
the
role
having
done
it
for
a
year.
Now.
A
Do
note
that
my
experience
doesn't
need
to
be.
Your
experience
like
I,
have
a
very
hands-on
styled,
I,
just
kind
of
drop
things
and
go
do
work
if
it
needs
to
be
done
or
if
it's
immediate,
including
helping
people
like
I,
have
a
go
through
and
talk
with
a
bunch
of
y'all.
Every
week
that
might
not
be
something
that
you're
able
to
swing.
That's
okay,
but
I
did
want
to
make
sure
I
outlined
kind
of
what
I
had
done
to
be
able
to
communicate
that
to
you.
B
Thank
you
for
being
amazing
and
being
hands-on
and
doing
so
many
things
that
have
made
calm,
calm,
successful
and
being
there
for
all
the
things.
You're
awesome
tyranny
and
really
greatly
appreciated.
Thanks
for
sharing
your
tribal
knowledge
with
me
a
bunch
over
this
last
year,
I
mean
like
countless
countless
things
that
you've
done
that
I've
made
know
what
it
is
through
come
come.
So
thank
you
for
your
all.
Your
work
thanks.
F
A
Thanks
both
you
I,
really
appreciate
that
cool.
So
are
there
any
questions
about
this
I'm
happy
to
answer
them
asynchronously
over
the
next
week
two
weeks
you
can
also
reach
out
to
Tracy.
She
will
have
a
lot
of
other
context,
so
you
know
there's
a
lot
of
help
for
this,
and
I
will
say
that
whoever
does
step
up
to
the
role.
A
I
will,
of
course
be
available
to
assist
and
always
happy
to
help
answer
things
and
step
in
when
you
know
you
need
an
extra
pair
of
hands
for
sure,
awesome,
cool
and
with
that
on
to
the
next
item.
Unless
anyone
else
has
something
they'd
like
to
say
on
that
cool
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
the
moderation
team
recertification,
so
I
created
this
spawning
from
a
discussion
in
the
moderation
team
at
the
last
meeting,
although
we
didn't
have
quorum,
it
was
more
of
a
hey.
A
A
There
were
no
objections
to
any
of
the
members
who
are
currently
on
the
team,
and
that
is
the
process
for
nominating
new
people.
So
I
would
also
like
to
say
if
you're
interested
in
participating
in
the
moderation
team,
you
are
always
welcome
to
self
nominate,
and
you
know
that
same
process
will
be
applied.
I'm
also
happy
to
talk
about
that.
If
it
sounds
ominous
because
if
I
can
see
how
it
would
sound
ominous,
but
it's
really
not
too
kind
of
a
process.
A
A
H
H
A
So
you're
correct
on
that.
We
have
not
been
reporting
that
internally,
that
would
be
on
the
conga
members,
who
are
a
part
of
the
moderation
team,
which
is
myself
and
Tracy
and
formally
you
so
we
I
will
take
that
up.
I
will
also
go
through
and
retro
actively
build
out
that
reports,
because
I
believe
riches
and
reporting
it
every
two
weeks
like
every
meeting
I
will
go
through
and
take
that
to
do
to
go,
build
out
that
and
get
that
shared
with
us
can.
G
I
have
a
little
context
sure.
So
the
only
thing
I've
reported
to
the
TSC
publicly
is
what
shows
up
in
the
TS
the
weekly
TSE
meeting
issues
every
week.
I
do
I,
provide
a
summary
of
moderation,
actions
and
I
at
mentioned:
TSC,
calm,
calm
and
moderations
that
so
that
people
get
get
up
notifications
on
those
comments
and
then
I
think
what
Rafael
is
referring
to
is
internally
ATSC
member
asked
you
know,
forced
information
on
who
of
the
current
moderation
team
members
is
active.
You
know
what
do
they
do?
F
Looking
at
the
looking
at
the
rules,
you
know
we
are
supposed
to
sort
of
you
know.
As
the
community
committee,
you
know
state
any
objections
that
we
would
have
for
an
individual
representing
the
moderation
team,
but
not
necessarily
to
vet
or
validate.
So
you
know,
I,
don't
think
we
are
obligation
is
quite,
as
you
know,
heavy
as
to
you
know,
to
assess,
but
rather
to
voice
any
objections.
If
there
are
any
so.
H
That's
that's
true
for
the
nomination,
the
Taft
through
the
year,
not
the
reason.
So
it's
it's
the
first
time
it's
a
first
for
the
team
got
establishing.
What
is
the
recertification
process?
Look
like
beside
it's
a
robust
must've
been
any.
You
know
non
resolved
issues
we
could
just
rubber
stamp
it.
So.
D
F
Of
you
know
the
folks,
especially
in
our
committee,
so
if
someone
like
you
know
so
myself
under
the
bus,
so
I've
raised
my
hand
to
to
be
that
and
and
then
we
have
contacts
around
Tierney
and
Tracy.
So
you
know
those
are
the
individuals
that
I
think
we
should.
You
know
focus
are
as
the
community
committee.
We
should
focus
our
attention
on
most
because
we
have
the
most
context
around
new
members
and
how
they've
represented
ourselves
I'll.
H
Give
a
little
bit
more
feedback.
I
was
a
member
of
the
team
for
about
ten
months
and
I
was
very
much
privy
to
everything,
but
that
was
happening
and
that,
and
by
in
the
time
that
I'm,
not
a
member
of
the
team,
I
know
what
I
don't
know
and
I
think
part
of
it
is.
Let's
say
if
we
want
to
take
this
recertification
process
prop
well
more
thoroughly.
H
H
H
I
I
H
H
Not
that
not
that
we
don't
need
to
do
performance
evaluation
that
we
need
to.
Like
material
said
we
can
say,
we
have
no
problem
in
general
with
the
people
on
the
team
and
we
certify
them
for
an
X
team.
We
just
need
to
decide
what
is
what
is
the
you
know,
their
intent,
and
what
is
the
semantics
of
this
process?
Yeah.
A
So
I
agree,
that's
also
not
the
Cochran's
decision.
That
does
because
it's
a
joint
team.
It
has
to
me
to
set
it
with
the
TSE
as
far
as
I
know-
and
you
know,
looking
at
the
moderation
team,
documentation
or
the
you
know,
the
nomination,
which
recertification
is
actually
a
head,
the
heading
or
in
the
nomination
part.
So
you
know
that
might
want
a
PR
to
kind
of
have
that
in
its
own
section.
A
Even
that
process
that
is
initially
needed
for
approval
does
not
apply
to
recertification
in
terms
of
every
single
person
needs
to
sign
off,
because
that
Ernie
happened,
or
you
know,
as
many
people
as
possible
had
an
opportunity
to
object
and
they
did
not,
and
now
it
is
up
to
both
DTSC
and
Kham
Kham.
To
basically
say
yes,
we
as
a
group
by
a
simple
majority,
say
yes,
this
person
can
continue
I,
I'm
good
at
tine
boxes
here
and
say
that
we,
we
could
probably
open
a
dish
around
this
Raphael.
A
A
F
So
doctor
linked
the
issue
issue
365
in
the
chat,
so
just
in
a
high
level,
you
know:
we've
continued
to
meet
with
the
individual
membership
subgroup
and
you
know
want
to
you
know
what
wanted
to
share
sort
of
you
know
a
baseline.
You
know
that
with
the
work
that's
going
on
and
you
know
website
redesign
and
you
know
a
lot
of
the
concepts
that
were
you
know,
planning
out
and
scoping.
You
know
intermingle
with
some
of
the
considerations
that
are
happening
and
are
sort
of
in
the
Gantt
chart.
F
After
you
know,
website
redesign
would
would
begin
to
the
land.
So
we
wanted
to.
You
know,
start
with
the
known
state
of
things,
and
so
we
decided
to
take
a
vote
on
you
know
just
that
they
did.
The
thing
that
we
are
aligned
on
is
that
individual
membership
is
a
important
part
of
nodejs
and
that
we,
you
know
a-line
and
agree
and
believe
that
individual
membership
is
important.
So
you
know
we
unanimously.
F
Guess
I
can
close
the
next
agenda
item
if
you're
interested
in
getting
involved
in
that
and
to
keep
you
know
the
intent.
The
rolling.
The
next
item
is
our
September
4th
meeting
we've
been
meeting
on
Mondays,
but
that
is
that
Monday,
it's
Labor
Day,
so
Tuesday
September
4th.
Please
join
the
individual
members
subgroup.
If
you
want
to
you,
know,
work
with
us
to
scope
and
define
this
sort
of
the
next
iteration
of
individual
membership
is
not
yes,
oh
and
attorney
to
you
know
scratch
off
another
agenda
item
that
user
feedback
thing
I
remove
that
item.
A
Thank
you
awesome
and
so
last
agenda
item.
His
first
pass,
a
poorer
communities.
There's
been
continued
discussion
there,
let's
to
get
back
to
it,
but
Karl
is
being
very
generous
with
his
time
and
sharing
a
lot
of
context
around
questions.
You
know
from
a
partner
community
perspective
having
maintained
or
maintaining
at
least
one,
if
not
two
possible
partner
communities.
A
So
you
know
I
didn't
want
to
shut
that
out
and
say
thank
you
him
or
them
for
you
know,
continuing
to
engage,
because
that
context
is
actually
super
important
for
us
to
make
sure
it's
actually
something
that's
useful
and
and
that
actually
might
play
into
the
individual
membership
stuff.
That'd
be
an
interesting
feature,
those
in
the
what
we
were
discussing
sorry
cool
a
little
bit
and
make
note
for
the
agenda
cool
and
that's
it
for
our
agenda.
A
Unless
anyone
has
comments
or
questions
on
that
cool,
so
we're
gonna
go
back
up
to
the
first
agenda
item
and
I.
Guess
it's
not
the
end
of
the
agenda,
but
talk
about
jazz
and
rock
or
starting
node,
plus
jeaious
interactive
at
this
point,
so
the
foundation
wants
to
kick
that
off.
J
I
can
kick
it
off
if
you
like,
we
have
a
bunch
of
folks
on
the
call,
but
I
think
most
people
know
that
we
have
rebranded.
Is
that
correct?
Maybe
I
should
just
say
me.
J
Yes,
yes,
so
basically,
we
have
rebranded
at
the
event
to
be
node
plus
Jess
interactive.
We're
super
excited
about
the
progress
we've
seen
in
the
past.
You
know
a
few
months
in
terms
of
registrations
and
people
getting
excited
we're
doing
a
lot
of
really
cool
things
specifically
for
the
node
community
at
Jess
interactive
as
well
part
of
the
reason
why
we
all
wanted
to
come
on.
J
J
We're
super
happy
to
talk
about
these
different
things,
I'll,
let
other
folks
step
in
for
updates
or
let
you
guys
if
you
have
any
questions,
but
I
did
want
to
bring
up
the
fact
that
there's
sort
of
two
things
that
are
big
on
the
in
within
the
node
community
that
are
happening
at
Jas,
interactive,
the
first
one
being
collaborator
summit.
Obviously
so
currently,
you
should
have
received
individual
emails
from
myself
or
Madinah
related
to
registration.
J
If
you
do
have
any
questions
related
to
that-
and
this
is
for
folks
who
have
been
approved
from
the
travel
fund
and
have
requested
an
actual
ticket
feel
free
to.
Let
me
know
for
the
collaborators
permit.
Additionally,
you
will
need
to
register
that
is
in
I
think
it's
a
no-no,
jeaious
slash
summit
in
one
of
the
issues,
so,
if
you
have
not
registered
yet,
please
do
so
and
again,
please
feel
free
to
email
or
message.
My
emails
ladylee
etna,
georg.
J
J
L
L
L
Get
in
then
my
recommendation
would
be
probably
smaller
would
be
better.
You
know
what
I
mean,
because
there's
gonna
be
a
lot
of
stuff,
but
you
know
I,
don't
think
anybody's
gonna
object
to
getting
a
t-shirt.
It's
just
gonna
increase
the
shipping
costs
and
you
know
stuff
like
that.
Stickers
would
be
great.
You
know,
I
think
what
else
do
people
have
in
Berlin?
That
was
a
that
was
popular
cups,
cups.
B
B
J
D
J
And
you
know
for
those
who
are
registered
for
collaborative
summit,
we
will
be
sending
out
a
reminder
to
say,
like
hey,
we're
kind
of
expecting
you
to
be
learned,
anyways
but
yeah.
So,
oh
actually,
another
thing
is:
if
anybody
you
know,
if
anybody
has
a
anyways
anybody
whose
company
you
might
want
to
sponsor
anything,
just
let
me
know
you
know
give
whatever
just
just
commemorative.
J
J
So
for
those
of
you
who
aren't
aware
of
what
the
community
corner
is,
let
me
explain
that
a
little
bit
there
basically
be
a
booth
area
in
which
certain
topics
like
topics
that
have
already
been
suggested,
for
example,
are
the
internationalization
efforts
things
talking
about
the
website,
redesign
I'm,
doing
just
like
node
office
hours
in
general
right
and
maybe
even
volunteering.
Your
time
to
just
like
come
hang
out
and
talk
about
notes.
So
a
lot
of
folks
from
kumkum
have
already
said
like
raise
their
hands
and
said:
hey
I
want
to
participate
in
this.
L
I
haven't
seen
anything
come
in
yet
Michael,
but
but
I
mean
just
to
echo
what
Tracy
said
there,
like
weed
I,
think
we've
received
for
submissions
in
that
forum.
So,
okay,
you
know
bring
them
in
I
mean
it's
it's
it's
like
officially
closed
because
we
do
need
to
get
on
to
the
next
phase.
But
you
know
I
mean
I,
bring
good
topics.
You
know
like
it's.
It's
the
community
corner
I
mean
I'm,
not
I'm,
not
deciding
whether
it's
good
or
not,
I
think.
C
The
other
thing
is
as
part
of
the
review.
If
we
go
out
there
and
say
well,
hey
we
should
pull
in
some
working
groups.
You
know
I
think
we
can
reach
out
to
the
you
know.
I
can
help
with
some
of
them
and
and
other
people.
We
can
get
help
with
that.
Others
yeah,
you
know
I
think.
If
we
make
an
ask,
we
can
probably
get
you
know
some
working
group
members
who
might
be
there
already
to
participate
even
if
they
haven't
submitted.
C
K
L
Yeah
I
can
I'd
say
what
I'll,
why
don't
I
Tracy
I
don't
mind
taking
this
I
can
follow
up
with
my
goal
and,
and
you
know
others
and
basically
say
hey
what
we
gotten
so
far.
I
won't
include
names
or
anything
like
that
and
and
then
for
anything
that
looks
like
a
big
gap
where
you
think.
Oh
this
is
this
working
group
of
that
working
groups
really
active.
Let
me
reach
out
and
see
if
and
I
know,
the
folks
are
already
planning
on
being
there.
Let's
see
if
they
want
to
submit
something
so
took.
L
But
yeah
I
mean
I'm
super
excited
and
Tracy
I,
really
sorry,
my
that
my
believe
it
we've
about
that.
My
dogs,
freaking
out
about
something
I
mean
I,
think
I
think
this
is
going
to
be
a
really
good
opportunity
to
expose
all
of
the
opportunities
to
get
involved
in
the
community
to
attendees,
and
so
my
hope
is
that
it
really,
you
know,
helps
us
grow
our
contributor
base
and
you
know,
gets
more
people
involved
at
whatever
level
make
sense
to
them
so
and
a
way
to
showcase
all
the
awesome
work.
A
Anyway,
I
think
it's
so
on
that
if
anyone
from
the
community
committee
or
any
of
the
initiatives
who
isn't
like
a
community
member
but
like
you're,
still
part
of
the
community
committee
or
anyone
who's,
not
a
part
of
the
community,
anyone
who
wants
to
submit
I'm
happy
to
help
you
help
walk
you
through
that,
like
we
can
do
it
today
or
tomorrow,
really
happy
to
help
out
I'd
love
to
see
more
of
y'all.
Presenting
awesome.
L
J
I
think
we
also
just
wanted
to
you
know
those
are
our
updates,
but
any
questions
from
anybody
related
to
the
the
conference
itself.
L
One
thing
I
would
say,
is
I,
don't
know
about
anybody
else,
but
when
I
I
know
that
it
reads
no
plus
J
s
interactive
but
I
always
say
her
node
and
J
s.
Interactive
I.
Think
that
rolls
a
little
bit
better.
Does
anybody
else
have
a
strong
opinion
about
that
and
I
kind
of
like
the
ways
house,
noting
yes,
interactive
versus
node,
plus
J's
interactive,
it
sounds
all
I.
Don't
know,
sounds
a
little
clunky
to
me.
L
J
L
A
M
M
I
got
from
number
of
people
in
the
community
and
from
people
who
had
been
talking
to
people
in
the
community,
so
I
think
I
went
to
the
board
couple
weeks
ago
and
said:
was
anybody
object
if
we
changed
the
name
and
there
were
no
objections
and
Chris
portraits
did
the
same
with
his
board
and
there
were
no
objections.
We
had
a
discussion
on
it
and
that
was
pretty
much
it.
M
Then
we
went
out
to
the
I
think
some
members
of
the
comm
come
were
asked
about
it
and
then
the
TSC
was
asked
about
it
see
if
there
were
any
objections
in
those
communities
here,
any
issues
there.
The
jsf
TAC
was
approached
and
asked
tweeting
hernias
there.
So
we
went,
you
know
we
went
forward
with
the
name,
change
I
think
there
was
at
least
one
other
sponsor
who
had
said
they
wished
that
node
was
actually
in
the
name,
but
I
think
that
was
pretty
much
the
genesis
of
it.
M
Now
yeah
I'll
be
honest
with
you.
I
am
surprised.
This
went
on
so
long
without
it
being
addressed
and
I
I
understand.
It
may
have
been
our
personnel
at
the
LF
who
may
have
not
been
paying
attention
enough
to
this,
but
if
there
ever
is
an
issue
around
naming
like
this
or
you
know
anything
in
the
community,
that's
bubbling
up
and
becoming
you
know
more
of
a
concern.
I'd
encourage
people
to
freely
approach
me
I'm,
happy
to
jump
in
and
try
to
figure
out.
M
B
It
was
can
I
just
say
something
really,
quick
I
think
it's
important
when
we
were
talking
about
this
on
Twitter
in
calm,
calm,
that
we
try
to
make
sure
we
keep
with
the
branding
as
in
node
plus
J
s
interactive,
because
the
recent
tweet
I
read
it
as
nodejs
interactive
because
there's
no,
you
know,
obviously
there's
no
plus
symbol
there.
So.