►
From YouTube: Community Committee Meeting
Description
A
Awesome
we
are
live
on
YouTube,
welcome
to
another
episode
of
nodejs
community
committee
yeah.
So
we
have
a
pretty
packed
agenda
today,
so
we're
trying
to
keep
it
at
a
good
clip
and
yeah.
Let's
I
guess
start
out
with
initiative
updates
who
would
like
to
take
a
lead
there
and
then,
when
you,
when
you
do
user
feedback
or
the
individual
membership
subgroup
updates.
Remember
that
we
do
have
the
agenda
item
through
the
RFC
there,
as
well
so
we'll
come,
but
also
go
back
to
that.
Yeah.
A
C
A
A
He
does
a
lot
of
documentation.
Writing
I
dropped
this
giant
bundle
of
nodejs
getting
started
content
on
the
internet,
which
is
really
well
formatted
and
kind
of
exactly
we
want
and
we
elected
to
reach
out
and
see
if
they're
interested
in
contributing
back
so
we're
gonna
yeah,
it's
a
very
impressive
collection
of
stuff,
so
we're
gonna,
we're
gonna,
we're
gonna,
try
and
engage
with
Flavio
specifically
and
see
if
we
can
I
got
the
Jimmy
back.
A
B
Sure
you
know
in
terms
of
user
feedback,
you
know
last
week,
I
I've
been
on
kind
of
the
job
search,
and
you
know
I
actually
had
to
cancel
it
last
minute,
because
I
got
an
interview
session
scheduled
right
over
top
of
everything
on
my
Friday.
So
that's
kind
of
the
the
state
of
user
feedback.
B
Yeah
I
know
Giuseppe,
has
you
know
raised
his
hand
that
know
he's
excited
to
get
more
involved,
but
right
now
you
know
kind
of
the
day-to-day
coordination
of
user
feedback
is
a
bit
blocked
because
me
operating
as
the
the
champion.
There
have
been
just
sort
of
heads
down,
and
you
know
it's
been
a
month,
and
you
know
I'm
like
at
the
final
throes
of
making
decision
and
apologize
for
them.
No.
B
D
Actually,
like
I,
had
a
chat
with
them.
Yesterday
we
were
planning
on
how
to
like
talk
about
mentorship
in
the
event
the
node.js
conference,
so
we're
planning
to
start
the
next
round
after
the
conference,
so
we're
trying
to
get
more
attraction
from
mentors
during
the
event,
hopefully
like
you'll,
be
there
and
we'll
get
lots
of
support.
A
Nice
synergistic
connections
between
website
I've
always
wanted
to
use
that
word
and
that's
raised
in
the
meeting.
So
let's
check
right,
there
done
my
business
person
yet
cool.
Any
more
initiative
updates
nope
awesome,
let's
dive
into
the
agenda
of
so
starting
with
PSA.
This
is
issue
number
211
and
nodejs
admin.
Just
a
continued
awareness
ticket
until
after
the
conference
for
oh
no
been
trying
to
join.
A
Can
somebody
ping
open
source
with
the
updated
link,
I
think
he's
probably
on
the
other
channel
yeah,
so
I
PS
a
ticket
or
no
Jess
interactive
community
corner?
There's
any
questions,
talk
Tracy
Lee
I,
although
I
think
at
this
point,
hopefully
we
have
things
lined
up
fairly.
Well,
that's
just
formality.
I
think.
A
Awesome,
yeah
and
I
believe
that
went
out
in
an
email,
so
yeah.
If
you
have
time
to
help
out
at
the
community
corner
I
respond
to
that
survey.
Thanks
Michael,
it's
good
memory.
Moving
on
announcement,
Joey
commented
on
all
these
tickets.
There
is
an
attendant
survey
for
collab
summit.
If
you
haven't
taken
it
yet
go
go.
Take
a
look
at
it.
It's
in.
A
A
Yeah
moving
on
I
slotted,
this
first
in
the
agenda
just
to
respect
tongue,
cuz
I
think
we
have
a
couple
visitors,
I'm,
not
sure
if
I
forget
her
name,
the
person
who
currently
manages
LinkedIn
groups
also
calling
in,
but
we
also
have
zippy
on
the
line.
I
believe
for
this
is
issue
number
185
partner
community.
The
LinkedIn
group
does,
if
you
want
to
give
an
update
on
the
conversation
we
had
and
where
it
stands,
yeah.
F
So
yesterday,
Adam
Greta
who's
from
Wildey
talked
about
the
nodejs
group
on
linkedin.
It
has
a
ton,
a
ton
of
people
within
the
group
and
I
can't
remember
whom,
from
the
calm,
calm
had
expressed
interest
in
first
joining
the
group
and
kind
of
ideas
around
how
best
who
may
be
mad
or
what
kind
of
content
they
wanted
to
see
in
that
group.
So
Adam,
grete
and
I
had
a
conversation
yesterday,
essentially
trying
to
get
a
good
scope
of
the
maintenance
to
managing
at
the
LinkedIn
group.
I.
F
So,
in
terms
of
next
steps,
there
I'm
going
to
kind
of
create
that
initial
kind
of
document
to
try
to
get
a
little
bit
more
of
a
framework
down
and
then
seek
out
folks
to
participate
in
the
document.
Maybe
we
you
can
even
create
like
a
little
mini
working
group
around
it
just
so
we
can
all
be
on
the
same
page
and
really
kind
of
understand,
one.
F
How
we'd
like
to
manage
and
and
make
an
impact
on
this
page
and
also
kind
of
get
a
good
sense
of
how
much
work
would
go
into
that
management
too.
So
we
can
really
level
set.
You
know,
expectations
on
what
canon
and
should
be
done
and
and
who
would
want
to
be
involved
in
that
do
so.
Adam
did
I
miss
anything
I
know
it's
a
little
bit
kind
of
a.
F
A
In
the
air
right
now,
but
I
think
you
you
captured,
it
really
succinctly
like
awesome,
so
I'll
make
sure
they
also
shared
zippier.
I
will
make
sure
to
share
that
that
link
on
issue
185,
so
people
can
jump
in
as
they
need.
So
we
kinda
iterate
on
what
we
want
to
see.
This
group
would
come
from
the
calm,
calm
side.
If
we
can
choose
a
you
know,
since
we're
gonna
have
some
say
in
the
in
the
the
direction
and
type
of
content
we
want
to
see
in
here.
A
This
also
presents
itself
as
a
great
opportunity
for
our
second
partner
community
to
get
added
to
that
list.
So
I'm
happy
to
help
be
the
contributor
help
in
that
group
and
champion
that
group.
I.
Would
love
help
on
that.
So
if
somebody
has
a
particular
interest
in
helping
out
with
that,
please
please
reach
out.
So
we
can
Co
I
co,
connect
on
that,
but
yeah.
Otherwise,
let's
keep
the
conversation
going.
There's
a
huge,
huge
opportunity
here.
I
said.
B
B
A
I'd
like
to
see
it
remain
as
a
partner,
communicate,
I
think,
while
he's
interested
in
continuing
to
have
a
hand
in
in
guiding
that
and
owning
it
to
me,
the
plan
was
kind
of
for
a
just
like
just
like
what
the
that's.
The
slack
group
is
slowly
transforming
like
we
have
in
that
group
and
we
are
taken,
and
that
is
a
conversation
channel
like
this.
This
seems
to
be
going
in
a
similar
direction,
while.
G
A
The
stay
involved
foundation
we'll
use
it
as
a
college.
An
allure
job
posts
and
sharing
professional
content
will
also
have
admins
there
as
well
to
help
out
so
I
see
yeah,
I
think
it'll
a
lot
like
node
slackers,
it'll
kind
of
have
that
same
give-and-take
from
both
sides.
It's
it's
kind
of
always
I
personally
see
it
evolving,
but
you
know
if
we,
if
we
decide
that
it's
something
like
foundation
just
takes
over
whole-hog,
although
I
think
would
be
worried
about
moderation
and
staffing.
For
that
probably
I.
E
G
A
A
What
you
format
in
moderation,
we'll
take
on
it
and
so
I
think
leaving
an
open
that
will
and
have
it
be
closed
by
a
PR
that
officially
adds
it
as
a
partner
community
would
be
a
good
way
to
go,
because
that
way
we
keep
kind
of
a
historical
context.
I
am
you
can
keep
discussing
and
that's
read
unless
you
think
it's
getting
too
long
when
you
kinda
hit
the
reset,
I
think
either
works
that
works.
Okay,
I
think
that's
deliver
awesome
I
will
remove
the
CC
agenda
label
and
it.
B
A
B
B
We,
you
know
we
were
tasked,
asked
to
to
take
on
responsibilities
of
managing
an
individual
membership
and
asked
to
me
a
proposal
back
to
the
board
on
how
we
believe
individual
membership
could
evolve.
So
we've
been
meeting
bi-weekly
and
no
thanks
everybody
to
who's.
You
know
participated
in
that
and
you
know
we're.
We've
begun
coalescing
around
an
individual
membership
model
and
an
incentive
structure
for
the
individual
membership
model.
So
you
know
a
few
weeks
ago
we
shared
you,
know
the
boat
that
we
done
in
that
subgroup,
with
the
baseline
of
like.
B
Do
we
believe
individual
membership
is
meaningful
and
important
to
note
yes,
and
you
know,
in
the
follow
on
from
that
we've
been
focusing
on,
you
know,
how
do
we
make
it
feel
meaningful
to
everybody
in
the
foundation?
You
know
the
individual
members
first
and
foremost,
but
also
you
know
connecting
that
to
everything
else
that
we're
doing
and
the
model
that
we've
begun
to
coalesce
around
is
a
incentive
structure
that
draws
upon
our
members,
and
you
know
it
takes
inspiration
from
how
github
does
their
education
program
turning
them.
Flaking
on
the
education
program,
name
again,
norisse.
B
So
github
has
you
know
a
really
successful
program.
You
know
that's
called
the
gate
of
education,
student
developer
pack
and
that
that
provides
you
know
folks.
You
know
new
to
the
the
programming
ecosystem
with
you
know,
incentives
and
partner
benefits,
and
it
was
really
you
know,
solid
package
of
benefits
that
that
it
was
largely
comprised
of
you
know
github
partners
and
some
first
party
stuff.
So
you
know
we
have
node,
and
you
know
the
foundation
is
fantastic,
but
we
also
have
all
of
these
amazing
member
companies-
and
you
know
so.
B
B
You
know
travel
budget,
but
you
know
they
also
are
kind
of
connecting
into
the
ecosystem.
They're
getting
you
know
a
suite
of
benefits
that
you
know
you
can
really
they
can
point
to
to
say
wow,
like
I,
you
know,
contributed
by
my
money
and
you
know
I
got
a
lot
from
being
a
part
of
the
noches
individual
membership
program.
B
B
Today,
to
get
a
standard
membership
and
twenty-five
dollars
first
for
student,
you
know
that's
a
lot
of
money
for
some
folks,
you
know,
may
not
be.
You
know
a
lot
for
folks
that
are
sort
of
fully
employed,
especially
in
the
US
or
and
especially
in
your
bigger
metros.
But
you
know
hundred
bucks
is
you
know
a
lot
to
a
lot
of
folks
in
the
world
and
you
know
to
folks
in
the
u.s.
to
I've
definitely
been
and
times
in
my
life
that
a
hundred
dollars
was.
B
Was
you
know
a
significant
decision
point,
so
you
know
to
address
that.
We've
proposed
a
Humble
Bundle
style
pricing
that
that
can
sort
of
Bend
and
flex,
and
you
know
allow
folks
that,
are
you
know,
sort
of
still
coming
up
in
their
careers
or
from
you
know,
parts
of
the
world
that
you
know
hundred
dollars
is
an
incredible
amount
of
money,
and
you
know
that
the
exchange
is
is
challenging
and
also
that
you
know
the
flex
up.
B
So
you
know,
folks
that
are
seeing
a
lot
of
value,
or
you
know
looking
to
give
back
to
the
other
know.
Just
community
can
do
so
through
the
individual
membership,
so
you
know
we
we've
begun
sort
of
capture.
All
of
that
detail,
and
you
know
put
that
down
in
the
document
that
we
haven't
completed.
We've
kind
of
gotten
it
to
a
point
of
comfort,
and
you
know
I'd
love
your
feedback,
I
think
tyranny
has
posted.
The
link
and
Adam
has
posted
a
link
in
chat.
B
You
know
this
is
sort
of
the
coalescing
of
these
meetings,
and
you
know
this
context,
and
you
know
you
know
what
we're
thinking,
not
necessarily
the
document
that
we
intend
to
go
to
the
board.
So
you
know
right
now,
we'd
love
your
feedback
on
you
know.
Do
you
feel
like
this
is
a
good
direction
for
us
to
go
and
then
what
we're
going
to
be
looking
for
in
the
next
few
weeks
is
taking
this
from.
E
B
And
no,
you
know
the
deadline
is
for
the
individual
membership
director,
but
you
know
I
do
believe
that
if
we
don't
have
a
clear
sense
from
you
know
of
where
the
the
individual
membership
is
going
and
how
we're
that
is
going
to
be,
you
know
a
mechanism
for
engagement
with
you
know
Jess
and
the
foundation.
Then
you
know
we
haven't
done
a
good
job
in
reinforcing
why
you
know
why
this
should
be
a
director
for
that
program.
Yeah
go.
I
I
was
just
gonna,
say
and
also
to
the
point
of
the
deadline.
The
reason
that
that
deadline
was
set
in
place
was
also
because
of
like
how
we
do
things
on
a
yearly
basis
at
the
board
level.
So
it's
getting
to
budget
and
strategy
time
right
when
we're
talking
about
future
planets
on
top
of
the
arbitrary
deadline
that
we'd
set,
because
we
know
that
when
we
go
to
address
the
individual,
Membership
Director
seat,
it
takes
a
few
months
and
you
know
that
the
election
is
up
in
January.
I
So
you
know
that
whole
plan
was
put
in
place
because
that's
just
like
the
cadence
of
what
we've
been
doing,
you
know
anyway,
and
then
a
really
great
opportunity
here
right
is
if
this
is
potentially
bringing
in
revenue
and
granted
that
revenue,
you
know
we'll
just
be
funneled
to
the
community.
I
think
that's
been
clear
is
like
you
know:
I
can't
beat
I
promise,
but
the
idea
is
if,
if
we're
bringing
in
money
for
the
membership
that
would
use
for
the
membership,
there
tends
to
be
how
this
kind
of
stuff
works.
I
That's
great,
to
be
able
to
plan
for
as
well.
So
it's
just
to
be
able
to
say
like
oh
there's,
you
know
even
more
cool
stuff
that,
like
the
community
committee,
is
a
you,
as
part
of
you,
know
their
recommendations
with
the
individual
membership
moving
forward.
So
it's
great
from
the
board
standpoint
to
be
able
to
say
like
great.
This
is
taking
care
of
like
this
is
a
cool
vision
for
the
next
year.
A
couple
years.
B
Yeah
and
I
think
we
can
do
some
really
fun
stuff
with
like
membership
drives
and
fundraising.
You
know
with
that
feedback.
Loop
of
you
know
this
is
enabling
folks
in
the
projects
in
the
room
now
throughout
the
world
to
come
together.
You
know
we
basically
have
a
lot
of
the
seed
things
there,
but
you
know
we're
missing
some
of
the
the
meaning
in
the
program
and
I
really
think
this
goes
a
long
way
to
making
the
individual
membership
program
meaningful
to
folks
who
are
signing
up
as
individual
members
yeah.
A
I
Justice
and
to
this
point
and
to
anything
else,
we're
talking
about
today,
there's
an
on-site
board
meeting
next
week.
So
if
there's
anything
here
in
this
document
that,
like
there's
a
question
that
you
have
that,
like
kid
being
answered
by
like
the
board
just
being
able
to
ask
something
I'm
as
part
of
the
agenda,
let
me
know
I
know
this
isn't
like
necessarily
an
in
the
place
for
approval
or
proposal
for
this
month
and
would
likely
be
set
for
November
instead.
But
if
there's
something
please,
let
me
know
I'm
happy
to
Dan.
H
E
H
For
context
for
the
people
who
aren't
in
this
in
that
discussion
we
kind
of
outlined,
you
know
once
we
get
to
this
critical
mass
I
think
we
said
it
at
2000,
then
representing
individual
membership
representation
will
kick
in
and
we
outlined
how
that
is
selected
and
all
that
stuff,
but
yeah.
It
would
be
good
to
get
feedback.
A
On
that
I
think
the
process
are
just
fearful:
Nicole
disclosure
with
the
processes
people
haven't
read
the
document
after
we
hit
2000
I,
then
I
believe
it's.
The
communic
community
committee
puts
forth
a
bunch
of
nominees
names
and
then
the
community
at-large
votes
on
which
one
they
like
to
be
the
individual
director
dan.
You
can
tell
me
if
I'm
remembering
incorrectly
but
I,
think
the
approaching
approaching
the
the
bored
with
that
that
number
in
that
process
and
say
will
formalize
it
a
bit
more.
A
I
That
critical
mass
numbers,
yeah
I,
think
that's
a
really
neat
and
very
likable
way
for
them
to
feel
like
that's
it's
working
right
because
we
numbers
be
much
lower
historically
I.
Think
I,
like
personally
for
me
to
be
like
I'm
already
on
board
this
clearly,
but
I.
Think
the
the
final
teeth
for
this
would
be
having
already
established
an
official
feedback
mechanism
for
talking
with
these
members
right.
I
G
I
I
think
we
I
think
just
from
how
like
to
be
clear
if
it
hasn't
been
made
so
already,
that
is,
that
is
unlikely
to
be
okay
moving
forward.
So
it's
been
clear
that
we
have
not
been
able
to
identify
like
a
solid
constituency
of
people
that
the
individual
membership
represents
right.
It's
very
hard
to
get
a
hold
of
all
of
these
types
of
folks,
and
we
had
a
very
small
number
that
did
not
feel
statistically
significant
to
the
board
individual
membership.
G
G
B
So
you
know
correct
me:
if
I'm
recalling
this
incorrectly
but
yeah,
we
you
know
took
the
number
of
you
know
what
we
have
today
and
you
know
looked
at
the
you
know
over
ten
million
users
that
we
have
in
in
the
node.js
community,
and
you
know
so
that
is
it
represents
you
know,
kind
of.
If
we,
if
we
could
have
representation
from
all
users,
all
the
constituents
in
node.
You
know
the
kind
of
the
watermark
of
you
know,
high-water
mark,
there's
is
actually
extraordinarily
high.
B
A
If
there's
a
method
that
anyone
thinks
would
be
would
be
better
for
choosing
that
that
number,
what
that
water
markets,
that
we
need
to
reach
heavily
encourage
chiming
in
on
the
on
the
document
and
writing
writing
up
a
proposal.
I'd
love
to
climb
box
this
conversation
because
I,
do
you
have
other
agenda
items?
We
can
move
back
to
it
at
the
end.
If
we
have
extra
time
synthesis.
G
One
I
think
that
576
members
is
an
amazing
number.
No
I'm
saying
convert
everybody
who's
entitled
for
free
members.
Sheeran
to
remember
an
amazing.
You
know,
first
was
a
mock.
The
second
one
is
in
general
I
think
it
would
be
easier
to
sell
to
the
unrepresented
members
at
the
moment
as
a
complete,
restructure.
G
Because
for
me,
conceptually,
the
individual
membership
was
associated
with
membership
of
the
giddap
organization
and
active
contribution.
What
you're
suggesting
essentially,
is
a
completely
new
program
of
like
taking
the
silent
majority
of
the
community
and
giving
them
a
voice.
I
think
it
would
be
easier
to
sell
as
restructure
and
not
as
a
retargeting
of
the
current
and.
H
That
you
have
of
it
being
forget
hub
members
was
like
that's
a
failure
of
the
program.
It
was.
It
originally
wasn't
intended
to
be
that
way,
and
so
like
we
were
the
ones
who
got
it
for
free
and
everyone.
It
was
a
huge
barrier
for
everyone
else,
so
very
few
people
actually
enjoy
and
so
I
think
that
that's
we're
trying
to
actually
align
it
with
the
original
expectation
in
the
tent
I'd.
A
E
B
But
I
I
hear
your
recommendation
of
you
know
as
we
present
this
back
to
you
know
we're
focused
right
now
on
the
deadline
of
you.
We
have
to
present
this
to
the
board,
but
Rafael.
You
know
very
well
considered
as
we
bring
this
back
and
are
sharing
this
out
with
with
everybody.
You
know
we
would
serve
ourselves
well
to
describe
this
as
a
reset
of
the
program.
No
good
messaging.
A
So
yeah
engage
with
dock.
There
I
believe
it's
open
for
for
comments
and
suggestions,
the
public,
so
please
jump
in
there.
If
you
have
ideas
moving
on
through
the
whole
agenda
as
issue
361
moderation,
team
recertification,
let's
be
really
quick
because
we
recertified
the
entire
team,
so
I
am
right
now,
I'm
gonna
do
the
chore
of
commenting
with
results.
Closing
the
issue
and
I'll
do
the
same
on
the
admin
repo.
H
While
we're
on
that
topic,
I
just
wanted
to
give
a
quick
update
on
actions
that
have
been
taken
by
the
moderation
team.
A
A
H
Yes,
so
this
was
mostly
just
to
try
to
get
people
get
comments.
If
there
were
any
questions,
if
there
were
any
for
the
calm,
calm
for
the
calm
front
panel,
that's
happening
that
Jason
I
first
started
notes.
Luster
has
melted,
so
please
feel
free
to
share
this
try
to
get
as
many
questions
from
his
wide
of
an
audience
and
diverse
of
an
audience
as
possible.
A
You
do
any
so
yeah
if
you
have
specific
questions
or
read
the
conversation,
you
won't
see
there
on
that
issue.
Awesome
getting
into
our
next
media
agenda
item
this
these
kind
of
go
hand
in
hand
since
issue
number
three
or
sorry,
PR
number
384
and
385
in
the
comic-con
Rico,
so
Tracy
I'm
gonna
do
my
best
to
kind
of
synthesize
what
what
needs
to
happen
here
and
I'd
love.
If
you
tell
me
if
I'm
misrepresenting
it
or
have
the
facts
wrong
it
anyway,
so
we
had
a.
A
We
had
a
fun
situation
a
little
bit
ago,
where
a
proposal
for
our
changes
to
our
Charter
got
merged
a
little
too
early.
So
now
we
have
to
jump
through
a
couple
hoops
to
remedy
the
the
process.
The
first
PR
number
384
is
the
exact
language
that
was
previously
approved
by
legal,
but
not
voted
on
by
the
board
for
the
Charter
change.
We
need
we
rolled
it
back
reintroduce
the
same
change.
This
can
be
needs
to
be
voted
on
by
the
board,
again,
actually
a
consensus,
so
it
can
be
merged
in
in
the
proper
order.
A
However,
we
want
some
additional
changes
and
additional
clarifications
and,
for
simplicity's
sake,
they've
been
broken
out
into
385,
where
we
should
make
them
more
substantial
changes.
So
right
now
we
just
kind
of
need
enough
consensus
to
bring
this
to
the
board,
presumably
next
week,
to
vote
on
for
384,
and
if
we
can
get
changes
and
consensus
on
385,
they
can
vote
on
it
at
the
same
meeting
likely
and/or.
It's
kick
it
off
to
legal.
A
I
I
E
I
A
I
So
I
would
say
the
sooner
we
can
get
this
385
amended
and
+12
the
better,
because
I
tend
to
try.
We
tend
to
try
and
give
as
much
time
as
possible
for
the
agenda
to
be
sent
out
before
the
board
meeting
so
that
you
usually
tend
like
we
try
to
aim
for
the
Friday
before
that
said
the
board
meetings
later
in
the
week.
This
time
then
normal,
it's
usually
on
a
Monday,
so
yeah.
A
H
Yeah
so
as
far
as
I
know,
Tracy
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
this
is
effectively
the
PR
that
updates
our
membership
to
not
be
observer
based,
and
so
you
know
that
PR
was
merged.
A
lot
like
in
April
a
belief
accidentally
because
of
a
miscommunication
by
me,
as
I,
urged
by
me
because
of
miscommunication
so
yeah.
This
is
the
landing
of
that.
I
I
The
executive
and
board
side
so
when
that
got
broken
up,
it
looks
like
I'm
just
looking
at
385
like
we
still
have
to
individual
membership
directors
listed,
which
is
in
direct
conflict
with
I.
Think
the
last
change
with
the
calm,
calm
director
coming
on
board
and
then
I
think
Michaels
suggestions.
So
I'm
gonna
put
a
comment
on
this,
just
so
that
we
catch
that
and
then
trying
the
PR
but
yeah.
It's
really
the
whole
point
of
these
PRS
is
to
just
get
in
line
with
like
the
world.
C
H
I
I
think
we
also
have
a
weird
thing
here
in
just
looking
at
the
Charter
like
I.
Remember,
writing
this
and
thinking
it
was
weird
that
I
did.
It
was
like
our
calm,
calm
members,
the
active
members
list
is,
you
know,
community
projects,
people
who
have
like
met
the
requirements
and
also
the
to
individual
membership
directors,
which
is
like
a
weird
thing
to
say,
like
they're,
just
automatically
like
calm,
calm
members,
even
if
they're
not
meeting
the
rules
so
like
yeah
I'll
work
on
this
a
little
bit,
there's
not
much.
C
I
mean
I
think
it's
always
been
a
bit
of
a
challenge
to
have
multiple
people
representing,
rather
than
have
like
one
lead
on
it.
So
I
I
was
on
my
own
my
understanding.
That
was
the
intent
of
making
an
official
director
for
comic-con.
But
what
I
would
love
is
for
everybody
to
kind
of
make
this
a
point
and
talk
about
it
and
decide,
what's
actually
wanted
officially
and
then
we'll
we'll
make
that
happen.
Cuz
sounds
like
we
all
got
different
messages,
long
way
for.
A
B
Is
since
there
are
sort
of
minor
tweaks
in
two
different
pr's
that
you
know
we're
trying
to
sort
of
rock?
Is
it
possible
to
merge
them
into
one
I
know
we're
managing
changes
that
get
landed,
and
this
not
the
other
but
I
think
would
be
a
lot
easier
to
sort
of
wrap.
Our
heads
around
you
know
the
deltas
of
what
we're
changing
if
it
was
just
in
one
single
document,
change,
yeah,.
C
A
The
powers
that
be
want
to
get
we
want
to
get
the
repo
in
the
correct
State,
for
where
things
are
as
approved
right
now,
and
then
we
can
layer
the
change
on
top,
so
384
is
lousy.
Just
like
we
need
the
stamp
when
you
the
board
to
vote
and
then
we're
it's
it's
in,
and
then
we
can
work
on
that
from
current
state
to
where
we
want
to
see
it
in
385,
so
any
in
all
comments
or
new
stuff.
A
Let's,
let's
do
it
in
385,
that's
at
least
in
one
place
and
I
believe
miles
did
create
that
PRF
worked
off
of
his
other
is
384
PR,
so
it
should
be
in
there
in
the
correct
state
there
cool
yeah
so
like
all
new
work
should
go
in
through
85.
Yes,
let's,
let's
operate
on
that,
it's
all
yeah
384
is
just
paperwork.
A
Unfortunately,
yeah
I,
I,
I,
guess
I'll
have
to
question
because
I'm
a
little
unclear
on
this
as
we
make
changes
to
language
about
individual
membership
director.
Is
this
something
that
we
don't
have
a
solid
answer
on
yet
and
shouldn't
write
committal
language
since
it's
it's
up
in
the
air
after
the
individual
ownership
proposal,.
H
H
B
And
in
terms
of
sort
of
dressing,
the
question
you
asked
Adam
about
committal
language,
you
know
the
way
I'd
frame,
committal
language
is
status
quo
is,
is,
you
know,
expected
to
continue?
So,
even
though
you
know
some
of
us
have
assumptions
around,
you
know
what
we
think
may
happen
with
the
individual
member
director
seat.
I.
Would
caution
us
against
sort
of
skating
towards
that
in
our
official
documents
that
we
know
we
should
do
a
you
know.
A
A
Cool
I
will
call
that
close
issue
then
so
we
are
starting
comment
time.
We
still
have
little
time
left
last
issue.
Y'all
we
got
through
the
agenda
almost
the
packed
pack
meeting.
This
is
number
382
assembly
establishing
and
embargoed
communication
channels
we
needed
over
in
the
calm,
calm
repo
fil,
you
open
it
up.
Gonna
give
some
context.
I'll.
G
Keep
it
short
because
I
think
now
the
thread
is
going
in
a
pretty
productive
way.
So
it
came
from
a
point
where
I
was
surprised,
unaware
of
the
amount
of
communication
and
decision-making
that
was
happening
in
email.
Threads
I
was
under
the
assumption,
with
our
main
communication
channels
to
github
repo
for
six
months.
G
While
looking
at
the
documentation
and
I
found
that
this
is,
you
know,
undocumented
territory,
our
our
charter,
as
I
understand
it
says
you
know,
be
open
and
inclusive
to
community
members
and
at
the
same
time,
where
we're
having
a
lot
of
communications
in
private
and
on
top
of
it
being
private,
that's
non
archive,
so
me
joining
as
a
member
had
no
way
of
catching
up
to
all
that
communication.
That
was
happening,
and
also
there
are
things
that
have
were
happening.
That
I
didn't
expect
to
be
happening
in
email.
G
G
G
A
A
A
Awesome,
that's
good
to
hear
other
than
aside
aside
from
from
that,
it's
it's
my
understanding
that
the
the
code
of
conduct
in
the
Charter
and
and
all
methods
of
operation
for
this
this
body
extent
like
they're,
not
tied
to
github.
It
extends
to
any
communication
that
we
do
like
we
reach
consensus.
We
go
to
a
vote
if
we
need
to-
and
it's
it's
irrespective
of
of
communication
channel.
So
in
that
sense,
conduct
on
the
email
thread
should
be
exactly
like
conduct
on
github
or
in
this
zoom
chat
I,
but
just
through
a
different
medium.
A
If
anybody
thinks
differently
like
it
looked
at
your
rationale
or
why,
but
it
seems
nothing
in
the
language
in
the
Charter
that
I
found
excludes
other
other
communication
channels
so
like
we
should.
We
should
respect
that
wherever
we're
talking
like
I'd
expect
that
of
a
Google
Group.
If
it's
set
up
I
expect
that
at
the
slack
channel,
if
we're
in
it,
the
the
body
exists
outside
the
communication
channels,
views
and
then,
as
far
as
excessive
use
of
private
comm
channels
I
in
the
last
year
or
so
on.
A
Calm,
calm,
like
I've,
seen
that
private
channel
used
very
rarely
I
and
there's
there's
been
special
activity
recently,
but
it's
a
it's
it's
once
in
a
blue
moon
is
what
I've
seen
to
the
but
there's
two
different
types
of
private
communication.
There's
like
we
are
legally
obligated
to
not
talk
about
this
right
now
and
then
there's
people
don't
really
need
to
know
about
this,
like
the
the
email
that
went
out
earlier,
that's
nothing
critically
private
about
it.
There
was
a
survey
that
people
wanted.
A
Comic-Con
members
to
take
like
it
was
so
there's
distinguishing
between
those
two
different
types
of
private
communications.
I
think
is
important
and
I
trust
the
members
of
this
body.
A
lot
I
trusted
members
of
this
body
to
try
and
identify
communication
like
like
that,
like
that
request
for
a
survey
and
if
needed,
push
it
to
a
public
communication
channel
where
we're
able
to
and
if
it
stands,
to
reason
that
you
know
other
people
might
want
to
have
insight
into
it
so
yeah.
Thank
you
Dan
anyway.
A
That's
that's
all
I
really
have
to
say
I
I,
look
forward
to
the
communication
or
the
the
discussions
still
happening
on
the
on
the
thread
like
I
think
it's
definitely
worth
exploring.
So,
let's,
let's
keep
ashen
away
see
if
other
solutions
are
good,
although
and
I
do
resonate
strongly
with
Michael
Dawson's
point
that
we
don't
want
to
make
it
too
easy
to
have
private
communication,
and
this
kind
of
conversation
splitting
just
adds
overhead
on
us
to
manage
how
many
threads
we
have
thrown
at
once.
So
want
to
be
aware
that,
as
we
go
forward.
I
Next
point
I
would
like
to
ask
like
if,
when
you
go
to
do
the
PR
I
think
there's
like
two
separate
things
here.
One
is
like
the
idea
of,
because
I
think
the
archiving
is
very
important,
I
think
to
anybody's
point.
Knowing
the
context
of
some
of
the
really
large
decisions
we
have
to
make
is
essential,
even
if
they
do
need
to
remain
private
for
legal
fiduciary
reasons
whatever.
I
G
A
I
A
I
yeah,
so
there
there
was
a
press
release
released
by
the
foundation.
Presumably
this
morning
it
was
gonna,
be
in
there
for
article
yeah.
So
it's
it's
big
news.
It's
been
something
we've
been
working
on
for
a
while
behind
the
scenes
and
we
were
so
excited
to
bring
it
to
light
I'm
so
happy
that
it
can
be
talked
about
in
the
open
now,
I
I
I
know
everybody.
H
For
what
it's
worth,
there's
three
things:
the
three
places
people
can
get
involved
in
this
discussion.
If
they
want
you,
there's
going
to
be
a
town
hall
later
today.
I
don't
have
that
link
offhand
immediately
like
in
front
of
me,
but
it's
we
can
share
it.
Somehow
there
will
be
the
town
hall
or
there
will
be
a
Q&A
session
at
at
node
interactive
and
then
there
will
also
be
a
governance
session
at
the
claritin
or
just
collaborator
summit.
H
That
adam
is
leading
solo
yeah.
Joking,
though
says
the
documentation.
We
should
update
that
yeah.
Oh
yeah,
so
there's
three
different
places
that
you
can
engage
from
starting
today
to
I
think
like
a
week
and
a
half
from
today,
and
on
top
of
that
there
is
also
plans
to
have
similar
the
Q&A
kind
of
town-hall
discussions
at
another
event,
I,
don't
think
they've
landed
on
which
one
that
is,
they
have
a
tentative
one
possibly,
but
it's
not
final,
so
I
don't
want
to
get
people
hope
hope
their
hopes
up
for
that.
H
So
there
are
plenty
of
ways
to
engage
with
this.
We
really
really
really
welcome
and
value
your
feedback,
and
you
know
to
make
this
a
successful
thing.
That's
really
important
and
that's
I
think
what
everyone
runs
right
now
is
success
for
foundations
and
projects
and
everything
so
looking
forward.
Those
discussions
happen.
Awesome.
A
Thank
you,
tyranny
and
there
will
be
moving
forward.
I
mean
the
the
conference
feels
like
a
imminent
deadline
and
a
line
in
the
sand.
Coming
up.
It's
it's
not
it's
really
the
kickoff
for
the
longer
conversation
of
how
we
want
to
build
this
out,
and
there
will
be
if
I'm,
understanding
correctly,
though
there
will
be
a
pretty
concrete
way
to
engage
with
building
out
governance
and
to
engage
with
the
process
even
after
the
conference.
Well,
it's
not
going
to
end
there.
So
there'll
be
more
discussion
on
that
in
the
next
couple
weeks.