►
From YouTube: Community Committee public session
Description
A
A
B
A
A
C
D
E
J
A
J
K
He
sort
of
mentioned
things
that
are
going
on
in
the
community
and
the
community
committee
subject
like
a
great
idea
of
anything
that
I
can
potentially
contribute
to
and
bring
in
some
ideas
from
around
the
ecosystems
and
anything
that
I
can
help
with,
of
course,
I'm
here
as
an
observer
today.
But
I
would
like
to
help
as
much
as
I
can.
Thank
you.
A
Well,
we
can
come
back
to
that
later,
so
touching
on
the
agenda
that
we
have
scheduled
for
today.
First
item
in
that
is
revisit
adding
some
scope,
a
case
taker
claim,
which
was
one
of
the
first
few
issues
in
the
repo
at
the
bottom.
There
I
in
in
the
agenda
I
linked
to
the
specific
issue
that
or
comment
that
we
want
to
discuss
but
Rachel
asks
if
we
might
need
to
revisit
revisit
the
issue-
and
you
know
anything
to
the
readme,
that's
under
our
diction,
so
things
that
have
been
updated
or
a
date.
A
You
nope
okay,
so
I
will
take
the
action
item
if
you
can
add
that
Tracy
to
submit
a
PR
to
add
in
a
section
about
the
collaborative
work
collaborative
repos
around
getting
started
health
education
summit
and
admin
as
well,
so
that
I
am
checked
off
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
defining
the
core
Hong
Kong
values.
I
need
to
get
up
a
doodle
for
this.
A
But
if
you
are
interested
in
helping
us
to
find
this
so
last
meeting
for
context,
we
talked
about
getting
together
there
and
having
kind
of
a
session
did
to
hash
this
stuff
out
and
get
it
some
submitted
as
a
PR.
If
you
are
interested
in
helping
us
to
find
those
core
values,
even
as
a
draft,
a
basic
draft
to
kind
of
have
it
merged
into
the
repo
I'd
like
to
ask
that
you
add
your
interest
into
that
issue
and
say
that
you'd
like
to
be
added
to
the
doodle
and
I'll
send
out
that
doodle.
A
A
If
anyone
else
has
any
comments
on
that,
please
feel
free
to.
Let
me
know-
or
let
us
know
me:
okay
next
is
a
PR
that
was
submitted,
adding
a
nation
initiative
section
to
the
user
feedback
for
the
user
feedback
initiative.
Just
wanted
to
get
this
reviewed
because
I
know
the
user
feedback
initiative
has
been
progressing
rather
rapidly.
A
I,
don't
believe.
Michael
is
here
to
give
us
an
update
on
the
work.
That's
happened,
unfortunately,
he's
Michael
is
our
representative
from
the
user
feedback
initiative,
but
he's
I
believe
he's
on
a
flight
right
now
from
know.
Tom
so
would
like
to
get
reviews
on
this
if
possible-
and
you
know
just
this-
aligns
with
updating
the
readme
with
other
work
that
we've
been
doing.
D
B
A
A
A
D
That's
a
good
point:
yeah
I
think
it
was.
The
dance
work
is
part
of
the
useful
feedback
initiative,
but
we
had
already
started
these
exact
initiative.
Yeah
I,
never
mind
rate.
We
had
already
started
that
it's
like
yeah
Michael.
You
and
I
had
already
started
that
as
a
thing,
so
it
seems
silly
whatever.
A
And
in
that
we
should
actually
I
know.
There
was
in
that
repo,
the
user
feedback
Rico
the
initial
commit
to
their
to
the
readme
was
added.
It
was
actually
committed
instead
of
PR,
but
we
do
need
to
actually
get
a
code
of
conduct
and
moderation
in
that
as
well.
So
I,
can
you
add
that
as
an
action
item,
if
no
one
else
wants
to
take
it,
I
can,
as.
D
G
G
A
So
with
that,
we
do
have
some
action
items
there.
If
anyone
is
interested
in
either
helping
us
address
these
specific
action
items
or
participating
in
the
user
feedback
initiative,
we
you
know
love
to
have
your
comments
either
in
the
in
the
user.
Feedback
repo
or
in
the
PR
feel
free
to
either
raise
your
hand
or
you
know,
just
start
hacking
on
it.
A
A
A
B
A
B
Just
some
general
conversation,
I
think
you
know
Rachel
has
is
that
note
come
for
you
and
things
like
that
have
been
going
on,
but
so
I'm
still
kind
of
hoping
to
connect
with
her
on
that
and
Adam,
but
trying
to
gather
all
of
the
information.
That's
been
talked
about
it
to
date
and
sort
of
get
to
a
triage
point.
I
think
was
the
most
important
thing
for
this
one.
B
So
it
looks
like,
as
I
had
left
a
comment
there
that
something
like
get
localized
would
be
good
to
integrate
into
our
process
for
this,
so
that
we
can
start
to
create.
You
know
localization
and
our
repos
and
whatnot,
but
we
kind
of
have
to
decide
what
the
endeavors
are
I
think
like.
If
we
want
to
begin
by
translating
our
site
or
our
you
know,
repositories
or
our
docks
and
things
like
that,
so
I
think
after
we
decide
what
we
want
to
do.
B
First,
then
we
can
sort
of
you
know,
make
some
actionable
stuff
from
there
and
then
I
think
a
good
way
to
go
with
this
is
to
figure
out
what
statistically,
like
you
know,
I
and
I.
Don't
have
an
answer
for
this
right
now
and
I.
Don't
know
if
this
is
something
that
we
can
draw
from
like
previous
surveys
that
have
been
done,
I'm
not
aware
of,
but
we
need
some
kind
of
metric
to
draw
on
to
figure
out.
You
know
what
languages
are
used
primarily
across
the
across
globally,
so
that
we
can
start
to
target.
A
B
A
D
There's
a
few
ways
that
you
can
tackle
it,
so
we've
got
we've
got
information
from
you
know
the
prior
surveys
that
you
know
I
think
are
skewed
because
of
who
we
tried
to
the
the
populations.
We
tried
to
target
to
get
feedback
from
especially
last
year
right
and-
and
we
can
also
look
at
activity
of
you-
know,
events
and
meetups
around
the
world,
so
sort
of
that.
The
note
world
that
we
have
as
well
yeah.
B
D
D
Probably
a
much
more
comprehensive
summary
of
countries
that
are
using
it
and
but
then
you
know
that
can
also
end
up
being
a
very
interesting
challenge
in
knowing
what
are
the
primary
languages
for
developers
in
those
countries,
especially
when
you're
looking
at
places
like
India.
So
but
that's
still
and
also
like
you
know.
If
we
look
at
the
activity
in
the
translation
communities
in
node.
Currently
we
have
a
number
of
inactive
communities
right.
B
D
A
So
one
thing
you
know:
if
you,
if
it
would
help
you,
you
know
the
the
group,
that's
interested
in
contributing
to
the
the
internationalization
effort,
I.
Think
in
the
word
we
can
help
you
set
up
a
meeting.
You
know
to
get
this
kind
of
hashed
out
and
something
similar
to
this,
probably
in
YouTube
or
yeah
hangouts
Google
Hangouts,
rather
to
help
you
have
that
face
to
face.
If
that
would
be
helpful,
if
that's
something
you
just
we're
happy
to
help,
you
get
that
set
up.
B
A
A
D
I
B
G
D
G
A
D
Cool,
so
top
10,
interesting
group
and
I
know
that
we've
actually
I
actually
ended
up
getting.
Yes,
then
I
should
connect
you
with
someone
who
reach
out
to
me
from
the
Portuguese
Brazilian
Portuguese
language
community,
wanting
to
get
that
going
again
and
didn't
really
know
where
to
start,
because
he
had
sort
of
tried
to
reach
out
to
the
existing
talks
folks
and
was
getting
crickets
so
yeah.
A
A
A
A
G
A
Up
is
a
broader
community
committee
team
than
a
Jase,
or
so.
This
is
something
that
I've
and
I
kind
of
realized.
We
were
misaligning
with
how
the
community
can
be
structured,
how
we,
you
know
our
intended
structure
versus
reality
right
now.
We
have
the
tier
of
observers
that
we
are.
We
that's
the
path
to
becoming
a
member,
and
we
try
to
actively
engage
you
as
an
observer
to
participate
in
the
work
that
we're
doing
right.
A
Now,
generally,
we
do
mention
the
community
or
at
no
GS
/
community
committee,
alias
that
only
has
the
active,
no
jet
or
community
committee
members
and
does
not
reach
out
to
the
observers
effectively.
There
is
actually
not
a
current
way
to
reach
out
to
the
observers,
other
than
add
mentioning
them
in
a
github
issue
where
it
would
be
relevant
generally
that
becomes
burdensome
because
there's
a
lot
of
observers
and
less
members.
A
So
one
of
the
things
I
would
like
to
see
us
try
to
approach
is
enabling
community
committee
observers
to
become
more
active
in
the
work,
we're
doing
and
be
more
aware.
It's
like
I,
don't
know
how
aware
the
observers
in
the
meeting
are
of
things
happening
in
the
admin
repo.
You
kind
of
have
to
go.
Discover
that
yourself,
rather
than
being
pinged
win
it.
You
know,
I,
know
GS
and
the
automation
team
recently
is
a
new
team
TSC,
but
they
recently
set
up
an
interesting
path.
Where
you
know
og.
Automation
is
for
everyone.
A
So
I
would
like
to
be
able
to
help
enable
us
to
get
something
similar
set
up
for
the
community
committee
observers
and
I.
Think
just
directing
OGS
/
community
committee
to
include
observers
and
then
have
committee
can
be
members,
and
this
was
suggested
by
Rafi.
Oh
by
the
way
I
have
community
committee
members
which
actually
just
bolded
it
have
that
beef
numbers
that
are.
D
May
I
made
the
comment
in
the
issue
and
I
think
I
have
to
bring
it
up
again
here.
This
is
not
something
that's
just
our
decision
to
make,
because
what
we're
talking
about
is
policies
around
who's
added
to
the
node
github
org.
So
that's
an
admin
conversation
that
the
TSE
has
to
be
a
part
of,
because
what
we're
talking
about
doing
is
adding
observers
as
github
org
members
in
order
this
is
the
unfortunately,
the
constraint
of
the
tool
that
we're
using,
which
is
github
in
order
to
be
on
the
team
right.
D
D
Within
the
repos
that
you
were
contributing
to
and
then
some
you
know
arbitrary
requirement
that
those
repos
had
headlined
and
then
you
would
be
added,
but
my
understanding
was
not
that
it's
it's
just
like
asked
to
be
at.
If
you
asked
to
be
added
to
the
github
org,
you
are
added
I,
don't
really
I,
don't
have
an
opinion
on
that.
I.
Just
think
that
we
need
to
make
sure
to
include
the
people
who
may
care
about
this,
because
that's
I
don't
think
it's
within
it.
Just
our
group
to
make
that
decision.
D
I
mean
I
think
that
it
needs
to
be
addressed
in
the
admin
repo
with
full
TSE
and
calm.
Calm,
I,
don't
think
that
there's
an
owner's
group,
but
that
needs
to
be
brought
I
think
this
is
a
discussion
that
has
to
be
voted
on
because
there
is
I
mean
in
any
programming
language
and
any
group
that's
existing
on
github
being
a
member
of
that
work
means
something
and
generally.
B
D
D
A
E
A
E
D
I
mean
I
think
that's
my
initial
thought
is:
is
there
another
way
for
us
to?
Is
there
a
filter
that
we
can
tell
people
to
be
looking
for?
Is
there
a
label
that
we
could
be
applying
to
tell
people
to
be
looking
for,
so
that
they
might
not
be
getting
emails
in
their
inbox
for
notifications?
You
know
because
they're
not
on
the
community
committee
team,
but
there's
a
way
that
they
could
still
be
watching.
Yeah.
A
So
there
is
CC,
there's
in
one
of
the
reposts
I
think
it's
either
admin
or
guessing.
It
doesn't
look
like
it's
admin
there
there's
an
additional
label
in
the
repo
called
CC
CC
review,
and
you
know
having
that
in
label
available
in
the
repos
that
we
are
interested
in
having
community
committee
members
watch
that
could
be
an
approach.
You
know
I
very
frequently,
just
shared
label
links
to
you
know
help
people
get
on
board
it
with
getting
good
first
issue
and
stuff
like
that.
A
B
A
A
E
A
D
A
F
G
A
A
So
with
that
I
think
we
have
one
or
two
more
issues.
So
there's
one
more
ad,
calm,
calm,
section,
2
the
newest
website
and
then
there's
one.
That's
not
in
that
list
that
I
just
didn't
have
cycles
to
put
it
in
IC
was
added
last,
so
I
really
removed
the
CC
agenda
label
from
the
the
work
on
adding
calm,
calm
sections,
the
note
G
s
websites.
We
talked
about
last
time,
but
when
I
made
the
comment
about
that
then
Adam
and
but
been
in
Adam
stepped
up
and.
A
They
but
they
deep
guidance,
advice,
inspiration
and
then
Adam
said
that
they
he
has
it
locally
in
in
his
you
know,
dev
environment,
and
he
just
needs
content.
So
I
am
going
to
take
an
action
item
on
that
to
sit
down
with
Adam
and
Ben
to
help
them
get
that
out.
If
they
need,
you
know
to
help
them
define
or
get
the
content
they
need
for.
That.
I
would
also
like
to
invite
anyone
who's
interested
in
contributing
that
to
that
to
to
that
work.
A
A
Okay,
so
I
believe
the
last
thing
on
the
agenda
is
probably
one
of
the
biggest
and
I
generally
try
to
do
that,
so
we
can
get
as
much
as
many
things
closed
as
possible,
so
this
issue
was
opened
by
Tracy
last
night.
Individual
membership
is
responsibility
of
the
community
committee.
I
will
paste
the
link
into
the
zoom
chat.
It's
not
listed
in
the
issue,
but
it's
the
first
issue
in
the
repository
right
now
issue
170
and
it
is
in
the
zoom
chat
for
those
of
you
who
are
attending
or
participating
in
the
meeting.
D
D
The
individual
membership
has
existed
for
a
couple
of
years
now
and
I
think
the
issue
dives
into
it
a
little
further.
But
it's
kind
of
time
now
that
we
can
be
examining
what
the
individual
membership
has
been
so
far
and
those
benefits
are
listed
but
they're
minimal,
and
what
we
can.
So
we
can
sort
of
examine
it
figure
out
what
needs
to
have
it
next
with
it.
But
all
of
that
being
is
who
who
can
be
working
on
this
process?
D
There'd
been
discussions
that
the
community
committee
could
really
help
with
the
individual
membership
and
if
they
were,
if
we
were
to
take
it
on
as
a
responsibility.
It
is
a
big
responsibility,
but
it's
also
a
really
great
value
that
the
community
committee
could
be
bringing
to
the
table
if
we're
able
to
improve
it.
So
that's.
G
D
J
D
A
D
And
I
think
it
wasn't
explicitly
called
out
in
the
issue,
but
thinking
about
it
now,
I
actually
wonder
if
this
is
something
that
from
I
don't
know
if
it
requires
a
resolution
from
the
board,
but
this
is
a
responsibility
of
the
foundation.
Currently,
this
is
something
that
has
been
one
of
my
bazillion
duties,
along
with
the
individual
membership
directors,
and
it's
it's
really
tough,
because
we
don't
have
the
resources
essentially
and
the
time
the
bandwidth
to.
F
D
F
D
Think
focus
on
this.
The
way
it
needs
to
be
focused
on
and-
and
that
goes
for
the
rest
of
the
board.
The
boy
at
the
rest
of
the
board
was
responsible
for
the
membership
here
as
well.
So
I
shouldn't
just
say
that
it
was
the
three
of
us
so
I
think
that's.
The
big
thing
for
me
is
that
we,
if
we
were
to
decide
that
this
is
something
that
we
are
excited
to
take
on.
D
We
would
actually
have
to
I
think
we
would
have
to
request
that
in
some
way
from
the
board,
because
there
are
duties
that
have
to
be
passed
on
from
the
executives
over
to
the
community
committee
and
also
sort
of
like
admin
stuff
that
has
to
be
coordinated,
so
yeah,
but
I,
yeah,
I,
think
that
and
we've
got
a
board
meeting
in
a
couple
of
weeks,
so
we
don't
have
to
do
with
them,
but
it
would
be
interesting
if
we're
able
to
offer
up
some
sort
of
proposal.
If
that's
the
case
so.
E
D
B
D
You
stole
the
call,
if
there's
anything
else,
that
I've
looked
out
from
the
individual
membership
responsibilities.
Our
duties
even
like
things
that
we
need
to
be
doing
I
mean
there
are
things
that
we
could
be
doing,
that
that
haven't
been
done,
which
is
like
absolutely
been
suggested,
but
we
don't
have
the
time
for
which
is,
you
know
a
quarterly
newsletter
to
the
individual
membership,
getting
more
regular
feedback
from
the
regular
membership
or
from
the
individual
membership.
E
J
J
A
And
that
was
one
of
my
concerns
early
on
was
you
know
in
in
when
we
were
talking
about
this
one-on-one
with
individuals.
You
know
I
was
concerned
that
there
was
room
for
failure,
but
it
really
we
only
have
room
to
grow
in
this
ages.
I
wanna
be
sure
we
have.
You
know
champions
that
to
help
that
so
yeah.
E
A
Yeah,
if
you
could
I
don't
know,
I
haven't
been
look
at
this
you.
You
big
comment
on
the
issuing
kind
of
add
your
plus
one
to
that.
That
would
be
helpful,
love
getting
anyone's
feedback,
including
observers,
remember
people
who
aren't
involved
at
all.
It
is
really
helpful
to
us.
You
know
representing
what
we
want
to
get
from
the
community
in
what
the
community
wants
us
to
do
so.