►
From YouTube: Node.js Community Committee Meeting
Description
A
Okay,
everyone
thanks
for
coming
to
to
make
sure
if,
okay
now
we're
left
thanks
for
coming
to
everyone's,
are
coming
to
the
community
committee
meeting
for
March
eighth
2018.
So
we've
got
a
few
items
on
the
agenda
today,
but
before
we
do
that
I'd
like
to
do
an
initiative,
you
know
review
or
update.
Could
we
does
it
anyone
who's?
You
know
championing
an
initiative.
Do
you
things
to
report.
B
C
B
It's
like
you're,
real,
we're
all
real,
so
yeah
things
are
going
good.
We've
had
a
couple
of
good
meetings.
A
few
days
ago.
We
met
with
crowd
in
to
set
stuff
up
on
that
side,
and
we
had
our
official
working
group
meeting
two
days
ago,
and
that
was
great
people
are
excited
and
a
lot
of
representation
from
the
electron
team.
B
There
Adam
Miller
was
there
other
people
so
who
were
getting
excited
about
that
and
had
a
productive
conversation
about
starting
to
scaffold
and
set
up
things
yeah
other
than
that
I
mean
we've
just
talked
through
a
lot
of
logistics
for
getting
into
auditing
the
groups.
Some
people
have
stepped
forward
to
say
that
they
want
to
help
out
with
various
localization
groups
like
Hindi
and
Polish
and
Japanese
things
like
that.
So
that's
exciting
too
yeah
things
are
just
going
well,
so
that's
about
it.
D
E
D
D
D
The
benchmarking
working
group
survey
and
are
now
landing
that
in
the
repo.
So
this
is
the
first
sort
of
data
land
that
were
including
so
excited
about
that
and
then
tomorrow
we
have,
if
you're
interested
in
the
organizing
part
of
the
mentorship
group.
We
have
our
first
kickoff
meeting
at
9:00
a.m.
Pacific.
F
A
C
Can
give
a
quick
update
on
the
Badgers
initiative?
There's
been
some
great
discussion
online
since
last
weekend,
getting
some
momentum
going,
so
you
can
go
check
out
what
we're!
What
we're
talking
about
there.
A
lot
of
early
planning
stuff
in
process
oriented
things.
I
had
a
couple
other
a
couple.
New
people
start
engaging
with
the
repo
which
is
wonderful
and
I.
Think
in
next
week
week
and
a
half
we're
going
to
start
planning
the
first
actual
meeting
for
the
initiative
after
we
let
it
generate
some
some
steam
online
chugging
along.
A
I've
actually
got
another
one
that
I
realized
I
have
contacts
on
that
others
might
not.
So
community
events
is
one
of
the
original
kind
of
initiatives
that
the
calm,
calm
had
I'm,
not
sure
I
believe
the
repo
is
archived
just
it
as
as
an
administrative
thing,
because
it
hadn't
had
activity
and
I,
don't
think
the
team
got
deleted,
but
there
was
like
a
one
member
team
that
was
largely
driven
by
a
calm,
calm
observer
in
the
past.
A
He
had
said
he
just
didn't
feel
like
he
had
gotten
the
support
he
needed
at
the
initial
sorry
I'm,
promoting
promoting
someone,
and
that
was
attending.
He
said
he
didn't
feel
like
he
got
these
the
you
know
the
steam
needed
to
push
that
community
events
thing
forward,
and
so
he
had
to
kind
of
you
know
prioritize
personal
things
over
that.
So
that
said,
you
know
I
think
we're.
A
If
there's
you
know,
if
anyone
wants
to
help
with
that,
because
I
think
that
was
his
pain
point
was
that
there
was
many
people
to
there
to
support
support
the
effort,
so
yeah
I
just
wanted
to
raise
that
I
believe
they
will
be
creating
an
issue
in
the
next
day
or
two
here,
but
if
they
don't
I
will
just
to
make
sure
you
know
to
do
kind
of
a
last
thing
and
generate
interest.
If
there
is
any
journey.
G
G
G
Yeah,
so
collaborators
summit
happens
twice
a
year
now,
one
time
in
spring
generally
or
summer,
and
then
one
time
in
the
fall.
We
try
to
pair
the
fall
one
with
the
big
note
event
from
no
foundation
which
is
not
interactive
at
this
point.
In
the
spring,
it's
going
to
be
in
Berlin
right
before
J
s,
comp
EU,
there's
travel
fund
available
to
contributors
to
the
project.
You
would
like
to
get
there
to
participate,
so
we
can
also
share
those
things
for
you
as
well.
G
G
We
try
to
move
the
locations
as
well
to
make
sure
that,
if
you're
not
able
to
travel
to
the
States
at
this
point,
which
is
where
most
of
the
node
Interactive's
have
been
held,
that
we
have
another
opportunity
for
people
to
be
able
to
get
together
and
speak
in
person,
because
a
lot
of
these
conversations
that
we're
having
the
really
tough
blockers
that
were
seeing
every
six
months
or
so
a
lot
of
them
end
up
getting
broken
down
and
resolved
at
these
collaborator
summits.
So
the
first
day
is
going
to
be
at
AWS
in
Berlin.
G
The
second
day
is
gonna,
be
at
Mozilla,
we're
very
grateful
for
them
hosting
us
that
these
venues-
and
we
totally
love
to
see
you
there
I
think
that
that's
a
number
of
the
things
that
we're
talking
about
now
that
are
coming
up
in
the
issues.
The
events
inclusivity.
You
know
all
user
feedback
initiative
we're
having
so
much
like
big
projects,
mentorship
happening
and
the
collaborator
summit
is
a
place
where
things
that
may
be
a
little
sick
condorman.
G
A
Great
thanks,
Tracy
I,
believe
any
of
the
initiatives
can
also
I.
Don't
know
if
you
much
of
this,
but
any
of
the
initiatives
can
also
kind
of
self
select
to
have
a
session
yeah.
G
It's
just
everyone
yeah
participating
there.
It
ends
up
being
a
bit
unconference
e
in
terms
of
we
may
have
a
representative
group
of
people
from
a
working
group
or
a
team,
or
something
that
doesn't
exist
yet,
and
you
can
form
it
there,
which
is
great
because,
again,
like
you,
don't
necessarily
have
to
have
that
process
in
place
ahead
of
time.
A
H
G
Is
an
excellent
question?
No,
so
we
partner
where
the
partnership
sorry
is
very
loose.
James
Caan
PU
is
a
great
slide
ship
community
conference.
We
knew
that
there
would
be
a
lot
of
people
in
town
because
of
that,
so
we're
also
trying
to
cut
down
on
people's
travel
expenses
and
being
able
to
already
be
in
one
place
so
they're
missing,
less
work
is
not.
Everyone's
employers
are
great
for
that.
So
James
coffee,
you,
we
don't
provide
tickets
to
that
conference,
we're
just
providing
the
collaborator
summit.
So
there's
no
registration
fee
or
anything
for
collaborators
summit.
I
G
An
excellent
question
heard:
are
you
talking
about
for
James
comer,
you.
G
I
A
J
G
A
H
Of
course
well,
as
stated,
the
purpose
is
to
move
things
forward
on
the
diversity
inclusivity
subjects.
I
know
that,
subject
for
the
community
community
and
for
the
community
in
general
and
I'd
like
to
have
things
moving
first
by
having
some
user
feedback
I
think
we
can
truly
see
with
the
user
feedback
initiative
if
they
have
something
along
those
lines
to
to
see
what
is
what
is
expected
from
the
general
users
and
developers
what
they
want
us
to
do
for
more
inclusivity
in
more
diversity.
H
Some
places
are
really
poor,
I'd
say
in
the
GS
event,
and
we
need
to
to
back
them
up
like
we
back
things
in
most
of
the
Occidental
world
and
and
also
I'd
like
to
take
on
the
subjects
of
non-binary
gender,
the
people
and
and
such
to
to
make
to
continue
to
have
this
community.
As
welcoming
as
it's
been
and
even
more,
if
possible,
so
any
volunteer
is
welcomed.
G
Yeah
I
think
we
used
to
have
for
those
who
haven't
been
around
very
long.
We
used
to
have
an
inclusive,
'ti
working
group,
and
that
was
very
clearly
prioritizing
that
work,
because
the
scope
of
that
is
large
enough.
So
we
don't
have
that
anymore.
That
groups
been
archived
and
there
wasn't
any
activity
and
I
think
that
that
it
would
be
a
great
opportunity
and
time
now,
just
interested
I
would
be
happy
to
help
with
that.
G
We
definitely
I
think
priority
number
one
for
that.
It
would
be
great
to
try
and
have
this
conversation
at
collaboration
summit,
because
a
lot
of
people
don't
feel
comfortable
having
these
talking
about
these
subjects
in
a
public
forum
on
github,
because
it
is
very
sensitive
and
it
means
very
different
things
depending
on
where
you
live
in
the
world
or
how
you
grew
up
and
I.
G
Think
there
yeah
there's
a
number
of
people
who
really
care
about
this.
It
would
be
great
to
get
that
started
again
and
we
want
to
make
sure
we
prioritize
getting
people
with
very
different
experiences,
because
I
can't
speak
to
other
people's
experiences.
I
can
only
speak
to
my
own,
so
we
make
sure
we've
got
the
representative
perspectives
in
the
room
so
that
we're
making
the
men
on
that
for
note.
Yeah.
H
That's
precisely
what
I
want
to
some
feedback
feedback
from
the
concert.
People,
because
obviously
I
have
might
have
some
issues
on
a
representation,
but
I
don't
have
all
the
issues
and
everyone
has
got
something
to
say
and
we
need
to
hear
from
the
people
who
leave
it
everyday
yeah.
G
And
if
even
if
you
look
at
like
community
committee,
like
everyone,
cares,
I
think
about
making
sure
pew
means
feel
welcome
in
our
spaces,
but
even
like
looking
at
the
the
lineup
of
the
people
in
our
space
like
Yemen's
call
today
we're
definitely
missing
some
perspectives,
so
it
would
be.
We
have
to
prioritize
that
right
as
a
very
explicit
thing
to
make
people
to
change
that.
A
So
that's
generally,
you
know
what
that
role
is
I
created
this,
because
I've
taken
that
role
on
continue
I've
continued
to
take
that
role
on
under
you
know,
as
a
chair
and
co-chair,
but
you
know
it'd
be
it
would
be
really
helpful.
If
someone
could
to
you
know
help
do
this
and
actually
Jim
is
doing
it
been
doing
a
fantastic
job
with
taking
the
minutes.
Oh
I
didn't
mean
to
take
credit
for
that,
but
I've
been
hearing
them
in
so
yeah.
That's
just
something
that
I
wanted
to
raise
again
and
I.
A
K
G
Can't
see
why
we
would
need
to
restrict
it
to
an
existing
community
member,
especially
because
we,
the
existing
members,
tend
to
have
a
lot
of
commitments
and
even
if
they're,
not
technically
a
member
they're
working
on
it
by
contributing
in
that
way,
now
the
biggest
requirement
there
is
is
time
they
have
to
be
able
to
attend
the
meetings
to
take
notes.
Okay,.
A
A
E
E
E
A
You
know
I
I,
don't
really
mind.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
you
know.
This
is
a
thing
we
can
kind
of
set
up
officially
and
and
have
it
be,
you
know
attributed
to
individual
or
individuals,
so
yeah
I
don't
mind
one
way
or
the
other
oh
yeah
there
and
there
you
know
a
few
people,
including
people
in
this
call
also
raise
their
hand
to
do
that.
So
yeah,
I
I,
don't
really
know.
A
D
A
B
A
D
A
E
A
K
A
C
I
can
get
a
little
bit
of
context,
so
in
more
than
a
few
places,
I've
noticed
comments
or
concerns
about
how
the
participant
history
document
that
we
currently
have,
which
is
right
now,
just
a
Google
Spreadsheets,
gets
out-of-date
pretty
quickly
depending
on
how
fast
meeting
notes
are
the
yard
and
pulled
into
the
repo
and
and
then
you
have
to
go
in
and
add
to
the
document.
So
it
was
think
a
good
month
month
and
a
half
behind
at
one
point
and
there's
no
reason
it
can't
be
automated
I.
C
Actually,
when
I,
when
I
saw
the
latest
discussion
happening
about
this,
I
went
and
just
as
like
a
proof
of
sanity,
rather
little
script
that
will
pull
down
the
repo
crawled
meetings
directory,
find
people
under
the
participant
section
find
they're
getting
up
handles
and
add
them.
You
know
collect
stats
across
all
the
meetings,
so
it's
it's
very
easy
to
do
and
it
I
just
wanted
to
start
the
discussion
about.
Is
this
something
that
we
want
to
automate?
Is
it
worth
automating
and
if
we
do,
how
do
we
prioritize
it?
A
So
it
looks
like
there's
been
some
discussion
in
there
already
with
various
people
work
on
this
specifically
also
Joey
mentioned
it
or
is
in
there
discussing
it
and
then
I
assume
Michael.
You
could
probably
help
out
with
the
context
around
like
where
it
would
be
hosted
in
the
processes
around
that
that
we
would
need.
J
A
I
I
I
C
I
K
C
I
I
I
C
C
I
Idea
it's
it's
sort
of
easy.
As
long
as
it
you
don't
need
to
share
the
you
know
if
it's
important
to
share
it
across
the
team
in
terms
of
like
who
can
get
access
to
it.
Who
can
maintain
it
then
that'll,
maybe
a
little
bit
more
difficult,
but
if
it's
just
you
want
to
have
it
running
there
and
you
want
to
run
it
on
your
own,
then
that
would
work
perfectly
well
right.
G
C
This
could
also
presumably
run
for
any
of
the
working
groups
or
even
bird
or
any
other
team
under
node.
All
that
expects
as
a
meetings
directory
in
a
certain
format
which
seems
pretty
standard
across
across
the
entire
org.
So
I
can
explore
that
as
well.
People
can
PR
their
own
repositories.
They
want.
H
H
That's
definitely
some
automation,
work,
I,
think
and
just
for
the
record
I'd
like
to
ask
again
if,
if
everyone
feel
this
is
relevant,
since
we
are
trying
to
have
some
restructuring
work
on
the
member
pathway
again,
I
think
this
is
a
great
idea
in
general,
especially
since,
while
we
don't
have
this
which
restructuring,
if
not
done,
we
still
go
on
the
on
the
actual
pathway
to
member.
So
maybe
we
need
to
still
continue
to
track
and
attendance,
but
in
the
long
run,
is
it
really
worth
the
effort?
H
A
H
A
A
D
H
Yeah,
it's
just
a
sight.
I,
don't
think
this
is
about
tuning.
On
the
contrary,
I
think
it's
it's
great
I
just
don't
know
if
it's
really
relevant
for
the
situation
attend
in
the
committee
community
membership
at
the
Nets,
but
you're
perfectly
wrapped
in
email,
I
think
we
should
probably
more
discuss
that
in
the
restructuring
effort.
Meeting.
Okay,.
A
Okay,
so
the
next
item
on
the
agenda-
I-
don't
know
if
this
is
you
know,
I,
don't
know
if
there's
anything
left
on
this
I
kind
of
gave
a
little
bit
of
an
update
on
one
of
the
current
initiatives
but
the
the
subject.
He
is
current
strategic
initiatives
review.
This
label
was
added
quite
a
while
ago
and
it
doesn't
look
like
there's
been
any
new
progress
on
that
specific
issue,
any
new
discussion.
So
unless
anyone
has
anything
they'd
like
to
add
to
that
I
think
we
can
probably
skip
this
I,
don't
know
it.
A
No
okay,
so
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
the
mentorship
repo
and
the
mentorship
the
issue
communication
channel
for
the
matched
mentors
mentees
first
meeting.
So
I,
actually
might
you
you
can
probably
fill
in
a
bit
on
this,
but
I
do
want
to
say
that
you
know
I
try
to
follow
up
a
little
bit
on
this.
Oh,
this
is
different
than
what
I
thought
it
was
I'm.
Sorry,
apologies
go
ahead.
Okay,.
F
So,
just
to
give
some
context:
basically,
we
wanted
to
choose
a
communication
channel
for
them
and
to
cement
is
for
the
first
meeting
and
possibly
for
all
the
meetings.
Basically,
there's
many
training
options
for
the
communication
locks
that
Google
Hangouts
I
tried.
So
many
different
tools
in
the
past
two
weeks
and
I'd
served
to
go
slack.
F
Basically,
an
option
would
have
been
good,
but
I
want
something
to
stay
persistent
so
that
mentors
and
mentees
can
persistently
use
it
to
talk
and
chat
during
competition
program
or
afterwards
or
during
the
first
meeting
and
afterwards
as
well,
so
I'm
not
sure
how
exactly
we
should
go
about
this
I
created
their
slack
channel
mentorship
a
node.js
mentorship,
but
I
believe
that
also
to
go
to
the
node.js
Foundation
to
take
control
over
taxes
like
that.
Just
like
the
forms
I
always
like
that,
I,
don't
know
if
you
have
yes.
A
So
I've
actually
noticed
that
several
well
I
I
know
the
moderation
team
has
its
own
slack
and
then
also
the
DOJ's
security
group
has
its
own
slack
now.
So
it
seems
like
we're.
Moving
to
that's
an
okay,
medium
I
will
have
to
check.
You
know
on
that.
At
least
you
know,
I
can
hang
one
or
two
people
to
see.
You
know
who
helped
set
up
the
security
one
to
see.
You
know
what
the
process
they
went
through
was,
or
at
least
where
that
was
discussed.
A
F
A
F
J
F
About
this
chord
I
actually
checked
this
chord
and
I
posted
in
the
comment
about
this
card.
It's
really
good
and
you
can
purchase
the
messages
but
small
person
oriented
than
team-oriented.
So
basically,
you
have
an
account
for
yourself
and
your
join.
It's
the
other
way
of
slack
and
I.
Didn't
choose
it
just
basically,
it's
more
game
oriented
I
felt
like
I'm
entering
like
something.
D
A
D
K
K
Jordans,
also
an
audit
owner
over
there,
Jordan
Harbin,
which
we
all
know
very
well
modules,
working
group
yeah.
It's
a
it's
not
like
a
really
disconnected
group
over
there
and
they
really
want
to
be
brought
in
the
fold
as
far
as
I've
ever
seen.
So
I
would
encourage
just
reusing
that
same
one
and
working
with
them
to
bring
them
in
the
fold
more.
Officially,
no.
F
A
I,
don't
think
I
think
it'll
be
the
opposite.
I
think
I'll
actually
take
less
time
if
we
use
notes
lockers,
because,
like
a
lot
of
that
barriers
of
like
okay,
who
owns
this
I'm
like
confusing
things
like
that
and
kind
of
all
that
topic
I
know
you
and
I
I'm
not
trying
to
divert
the
time
discussion
here,
but
actually
on
that
I
know.
A
J
F
Thanks
I
just
want
a
lot
on
that
there's
already
people
submitting
on
the
forms
like
if
it's
gaining
some
momentum,
although
its
own
and
the
shoe,
which
is
really
good,
there's
like
12
or
13
solution
forms
already,
both
on
the
monitors
on
the
vintage
side.
So
it's
good
to
move
fast
with
that
as
well.
D
A
K
So
as
something
you
probably
saw
I
I
piped
in
on
on
some
of
the
movement
that
was
going
on
putting
licenses
around,
we
had
a
legal
committee
meeting
and
it
was
discussing
licenses.
It
was
the
issue
that
was
opened
over
on
the
TSC
that
that
started
it
and
so
I
knew
some
of
this
was
kind
of
coming
down
the
pipeline,
and
so
I
wanted
to
just
kind
of
hold
off
on
doing
license
stuff.
K
I'll.
Just
briefly,
go
quickly,
go
over
them.
The
first
one
is
do
not
strip
or
alter
existing
copyright
notices.
Second,
other
projects
have
utilized
the
phrase
foundation,
name
or
project
and
its
contributors
in
the
in
the
notice.
Adding
dates
is
not
preferable.
It
doesn't
have
a
legal
impact
and
will
be
exclude
would
be
excluded
only
for
ease
of
administration.
K
If
a
file
is
updated
by
the
project,
the
original
author,
a
lot
of
times
we
bring
in
outside
projects
so
like
nan,
for
example,
was
created
by
Rob
bagg.
So
it
says
copyright,
Rob
bagg.
We
never
touched
the
original
copyright
there
at
all.
If
anything,
we
we
would
just
add
the
foundation
name
and
contributors,
and
we
do
that.
If
we
update
that
project
and
then
we
prefer,
if
we're
adding
something
brand-new,
we
prefer
the
SP
DX
tagging,
which
you
go
to
sdbx
org.
K
That
said,
what
we
didn't
cover
was
what
came
up
more
specific
to
what
was
happening
here
in
calm,
calm
and
that
was
non
code
related
repos
and
adding
copyrights
to
it.
My
completely
non
official
lawyering
would
say
that
MIT
is
probably
inappropriate
for
that,
since
it,
the
language
is
specifically
around
software.
K
C
But
I
think
we
need
to
split
it
into
two
asks.
What
do
we
do
for
repos?
That's
mostly
writing
in
content
and
process,
and
then
what
do
we
do
for
ones
that
might
have
some
design
as
well?
Are
they
different?
Should
they
be
treated
differently
because
website,
redesign
and
badges
will
have
design
assets
committed
and.
A
K
D
K
D
So
some
something
that
I've
found
with
interacting
with
the
legal
folks.
You
know,
if
you
just
kind
of
give
them
an
open-ended
question
of
like
what
should
we
use
some
of
this
and
the
taking
you
know
a
lot
of
time
and
they're
starting
from
scratch.
So
if
we
have
a
at
least
a
hypothesis,
what
we
might
want
to
use
it
will
be
will
be
the
answer
more
quickly,
where
it's
kind
of
should
we
use
a
mentioned
s,
SN,
T,
C,
or
something
like
that.