►
From YouTube: Node.js Community Committee Meeting
Description
A
B
Just
briefly,
there's
not
as
much
activity
in
the
last
couple
weeks
as
there
has
been
that
completes
before
that,
primarily
I'm,
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
offload
the
idea
that,
like
I,
am
I'm
like
this
trick.
You
know
I'm
like
more
sort
of
like
a
big
leadership.
Part
of
this
I'd,
like
other
people,
to
take
big
leadership
parts
as
well
so
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
make
that
work.
So,
when
I
have
like
personal
things,
I
have
to
take
care
of
I'd,
like
other
people,
to
help
so
I'm
gonna
be
working
on
that.
B
C
Yeah
I
can
get
give
an
update
in
a
similar
vein
for
badges
initiative
like
you
had
also
been
unable
to
dive
into
developing
actual
content
as
much
in
the
past
two
weeks,
I
and
what
I've
been
excited
to
see.
There's
been
increased
engagement
on
the
repo
we
now
have
four
official
members
and
I'm
gonna
get
our
official
first
meeting
started
in
the
next
next
couple
days
here:
planning
for
it
yeah.
That's.
E
March
30th
we're
getting
together
the
the
tooling
space
folks
and
we're
gonna,
bring
tooling
they're
gonna
share
and
we
have
TSU
and
some
calm,
calm
and
you
know
just
talk
and
get
to
know
each
other
a
little
more
so
really
excited
about
it.
You
know
it's
first
time.
We've
done
this
one
and
it's
new
groups
that
we're
engaging
for
user
feedback
and
engagement
has
been
really
positive.
So
I'll
drop
a
link
in
second
to
in
the
chat
but
I'm
bi.
You
ought
to
come.
It's
9:00
a.m.
E
E
Okay,
so
if
there's
no
other
updates,
I
will
certainly
the
mentorship
update.
So
tomorrow
we
have
a
team
meeting
if
you're
interested
in
getting
involved
and
working
on
the
the
coordination
sounds
like
everyone
doesn't
have
enough
work
to
do
so.
If
you
want
more
work,
we're
actively
you're
getting
getting
the
the
mentorship
team
set
up,
awkward
who's
spearheading
the
initiative,
I'm
helping
out
and
Conrad
Hall
and
I
believe
his
last
name.
E
A
E
F
E
F
G
E
A
E
A
I
will
add.
Just
if
you
want
to
come
out
to
the
collaboratory
summit,
please
be
sure
to
kind
of
start
preparing
for
that.
It's
early,
June,
I,
believe
I,
know
it's
true,
yep
Jude
first,
so
may
31st
in
June.
First,
it
will
be
in
Berlin
pairing
with
Jesus
confit
you.
So
if
you
like
to
come,
we'd
love
to
have
you,
there's
gonna,
be
quite
a
few
collaborators
there
from
across
the
project.
Calm,
calm,
everything
else,
TSE
admin,
other
things
so
yeah
we'd
love
to
see
there.
A
A
F
F
We
have
to
make
sure
that
we
follow
the
steps,
so
anybody
who's
plus
warning
you
should
have
have
read
the
full
travel
fund
document
to
know
what
you
should
be
approving
and
how
and
know
that
you
are
taking
responsibility.
If
there
are
not
funds
available
and
you've
approved
them,
you
have
potentially
set
somebody
back
money
that
they
will
not
be
reimbursed
for
so
it
is
a
very
real
responsibility.
My
recommendation
is,
if
you
have
questions,
feel
free
to
ping.
H
F
That's
that's
a
good
point
because
we
do
need
the
admin.
Repo
is
not
watched
as
closely
I.
Think
as
the
comm
come
and
the
TSE
even
pros
are
so
yeah
I
can
make
a
point
to
go
through
pain.
Terrell
just
mentioned
that
there's
a
few
people
who
are
waiting
for
plus
one
so
I'm
I'm
happy
to
go
in
and
do
that.
F
Yeah,
that's
a
good
point.
If
we
need
to
be
able
to
escalate
it,
especially
now
is
this
travel
season
is
getting
closer
I,
don't
know
if
there's
a
way
other
than
making
sure
that
you
like
at
the
calm,
calm
or
TSC,
which
is
also
in
the
instruction
to
help
get
at
least
more
notifications
happening
for
us
to
have
eyes
on
it.
C
F
F
Don't
think,
we've
had
any
problems
from
that
yet,
but
in
seeing
that
I
recognize
that
we
are
supposed
to
have
a
monthly
I,
think
it's
something
that
we
could
have
both
the
TSE
chair
and
journey
make
sure
to
check
in
with
you
on
a
monthly
basis.
Just
to
you
know
like
what
the
total
is
that
we're
at
from
accounting
sought
from
the
LF
accounting
side.
Yes,
so
that
works.
Staying
ahead
of
the
game.
F
I
know
last
year
in
the
year
before
it's
not
been
a
problem
with
us
getting
close
to
tapping
out,
but
we
are
also
being
way
more
aggressive
now
in
making
sure
that
people
know
about
it.
So
what
we
seeing
way
more
activity-
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
don't
get
anywhere
near
there
and
that
we
also
have
time
if
we
do
get
near
there
to
have
plenty
of
time
to
request
to
the
board
and
plan
and
calculate
and
sort
of
you
know.
What's
that
that
additional
need
yeah.
G
F
G
Point
out
late
I:
we
got
to
make
sure
that
when
people
do
apply
for
it,
they
also
submit
their
expenses
in
a
timely
manner,
because
sometimes
I
think
people
get
approved.
Then
you
know
something
changes
and
then
those
funds
are
sort
of
locked
up
and
I
got
I've
gotten
to
travel.
It's
best
reports
from
last
year's
collapse
summit
in
this
calendar
year
wish
doesn't.
A
A
F
I
A
D
G
And
typically,
what
happens
about
the
15th
or
so
of
every
month
is
I,
get
the
actuals
from
accounting
that
say
how
much
has
been
spent.
So
I
can
always
give
you
that
number
there
were
previous
month.
It's
roughly
the
15th.
It
depends
on
how
the
week's
fall,
but
but
every
month
we
can
just
give
you.
The
number
looks
there
from
the
finances
and
then,
if
there's
a
Delta
between
what's
been
paid
out
and
what
we
think
we,
our
liability
is
gonna
be
act
and
we
can
plan
for
that
and
more
easily
yeah.
A
A
C
D
A
Next
item,
so
this
issue,
201,
is
something
that
is
an
older
issue.
It
came
from
the
discussion
around
the
still
open,
PR,
create
working
group
CMD
and
then,
which
you
know,
was
an
attempt
to
add
documentation
around
what
working
groups
are
in
the
Capcom,
and
then
this
is
an
action
item
taken
to
kind
of
begin
working
on
that
I
added
this
today.
A
This
is,
you
know
this
is
an
issue
from
December
28th
2017
I
added
this
today,
because
this
is
how
this
discussion
has
come
up
like
three
or
four
times
in
the
past
two
weeks
for
me
and
when
I've
been
talking
with
other
people,
specifically
around
inclusivity
or
not
inclusive,
the
internationalisation,
internationalization
working
group,
and
then
you
know
even
evangelism
actually
is
part
of
that.
You
know.
Is
it
we
don't
actually
have
documentation
on
what
a
working
group
is
so
I,
don't
think
we
can
actually
have
a
working
group
so
yeah
we.
E
A
So
you're
all
welcome
to
come
to
that,
including
observers
and
kind
of
help.
Us
flesh
that
out
and
kind
of
define
how
membership
and
collaboration-
and
it
goes
in
the
future
for
calm,
calm,
we're
making
progress,
but
oh
definitely
something
it's
definitely
something
that
we
should
probably
add
to
the
agenda.
For
that.
F
A
F
F
Part
of
this
conversation
has
been
like
the
working
groups
and
the
teams,
and
whatever
we've
got
going
like
they
should
all
feel
valued
and
be
contributing
without
needing
to
be
a
member
of
calm,
calm
which
was
created.
You
know
the
membership
is
created
to
deal
with
the
administrative
minutiae
of
the
community
initiatives,
not
to
be
the
only
way
that
you
could
be
considered
a
collaborator
by
you
know
being
in
this
top
level
committee
sort
of
phone.
F
So
we're
also
talking
with
some
of
the
TSC
folks
on
what
the
definition
of
collaborator
really
is
and
like
whether
it
needs
to
adapt
or
whether
we
need
to
have
a
separate
term
for
that.
That
is
of
equal
value
in
the
project.
So
it's
very
fascinating
and
I
think
that
yeah
I
think
should
so.
Should
the
working
group
discussion
be
a
part
of
that
meeting.
I
think.
A
F
Yeah,
we
probably
need
to
have
drafts
like
for
us.
I
would
say
for
both
the
individual
membership
too
many
things
on
my
brain,
calm,
calm,
member
definition
and
then
the
working
group
definition
as
they
exist
and
maybe
how
they
need
to
be
changed,
and
then
we
can
tear
them
up
from
there,
because
I
think
from
the
prior
conversations
we're
all
on
this
page
of,
like
of
that
yeah.
Okay.
A
B
Was
just
gonna
say
also,
uniquely
in
that
context,
where
we're
seeing
confusion
between
people
wanting
to
be
thinking
that
they
might
need
to
draw
when
con-com
in
order
to
participate
in
a
working
group.
I've
seen
it
even
on
a
sub
level,
where
people
are
confused
about
needing
to
join
like
a
working
group
to
be
able
to
contribute,
in,
like
say,
a
localization
group
and
they're
thinking
that
they
need
to
join
that
so
yeah
I'm,
creating
clear
expectation,
creating
clear
definition.
I
think
is
really
really
key.
So
thanks
for
thanks
for
putting
us
forward,
yeah.
A
A
E
So
before
before
we
get,
you
know
off
that
topic
I'd
like
to
sort
of
broach
a
matter
of
process
in
you
know
how
were
how
we're
empowering
the
group
that's
going
and
doing
the
work
to
be
successful
right.
So
we
we
have.
You
know
what
what
I
would
you
know
what
we
could
describe
as
a
subcommittee?
You
know
going
off
and
working
on
these
matters
on
behalf
of
the
the
greater
the
greater
calm,
calm
and
I'm,
just
wondering
if
we
want
to
give
that
a
little
bit
more
definition,
so
we
explicitly
empower
that
group.
E
You
know
we
recognize
as
a
broader,
calm.
Calm
that
you
know
not
everybody
is
you
know,
interested
or
able
to
participate
in
that
discussion,
but
we,
as
a
group,
collectively
agree
that
you
know
we
want
to
see
that
happen,
and
you
know
we
want
to
see
that
will
break
you
back
in
will
ratified
and
whatnot,
but
we
don't
really
have
process
for
that.
Is
it
worth
exploring
that?
Well.
E
C
F
A
E
Putting
it
down
I
think
you
know,
I
would
say
we
create
an
issue
and
saying
you
know,
there's
a
committee
of
folks.
You
know
these
are
the
folks
who
volunteered
and
you
know
these
are
our
objectives
and
I
think
that's
enough
structure.
For
now.
It's
the
first
time
we're
you
know,
really
going
and
doing
this
and
to
be
successful.
Yeah.
F
That
would
be
nice
to
you.
Just
to
have
it
captured
is
a
document
in
the
end
to
like,
once,
we've
gotten
this
to
be
a
membership
initiative.
You
know,
as
a
readme
like
this
at
this
time,
was
captured
in
this
way.
People
love
to
read
that
context
for
down
the
road
when
we're
making
other
decisions
or
potentially
I
mean.
D
A
A
So
will
the
members
of
subgroup
be
members
of
the
come?
Come
I,
don't
necessarily
know
if
that'll
change
like
if
they're
an
observer
effectively,
will
that
elevate
them
to
calm
primary
ship
so
I,
don't
think
that
would
change
the
process
that
already
exists,
but
I
don't
think
that
you
know.
We've
we've
discussed
this
in
the
membership
program
or
the
mitt,
whatever
the
the
term
is
gonna,
be
the
membership
initiative
thing
that
they're.
You
know
it's
open
to
anyone
so
I.
A
F
We're
basically
trying
to
like
figure
out
how
we
can
do
away
with
the
observer
status
being
the
way
that
you
earn
calm,
calm
membership,
because
it's
like
a
long
crawl
for
something
that
people
like
may
not
want
to
be
doing
as
their
majority
we're
great.
They
may
want
to
just
be
working
on
internationalization
or
education
or
evangelism,
and
that's
awesome,
and
we
want
them
to
focus
on
that
energy
if
they
want
to
and
not
be
spending
time
attending
compound
meetings.
If
that's
not
what
they.
I
F
F
A
And
like
I
mean
I
was
an
observer
like
a
year
ago
and
I
became
I.
Remember
you
go
so
I
haven't
I,
don't
know
what
the
process
is
like
now
like
it
might
be.
A
different
experience,
so
I
think
that
that
goes
for.
You
know,
there's
a
wide
range
across
the
last
year
that
different
people
in
this
meeting
right
now,
who
were
members,
have
had
so
yeah
awesome.
A
A
A
So
it
should
be
automated
I
heard
someone
else
saying
that
they
also
didn't.
This
was
in
a
different
issue
in
the
car
mom
or
someone
came
in
and
was
looking
for
something,
and
we
pointed
them
there,
and
they
also
said
yeah
idea
didn't
work
so
I'm
we
might
Tracy
and
I
know
Tracy
and
I.
Both
are
pretty
active
in
there
I
know.
Dan
is
also
familiar
with
the
maintainer.
A
A
J
I
D
D
E
K
D
K
K
F
We
have
an
existing
I
could
have
sworn
that
we
had
somewhere
in
the
project.
A
note
about
non
code,
licensed
content
license.
A
Yeah,
so
I
I
do
think
that
there's
there's
been
a
discussion
recently
that
miles
posted.
You
know
miles
and
Mark
were
having
a
discussion
about
it,
and
then
we
kind
of
got
pulled
into
that
one
as
well.
I
can't
remember
the
context
of
where
I
heard
it
I've
had
too
many
meetings
over
the
past
few
weeks.
But
I
commented
in
that
issue
that
you
know.
Mark
said
that
feedback
from
the
legal
team
is
don't
change
licenses
once
you
already
have
a
license,
and
then
you
know
you
know
what
what's
he
trees.
A
J
G
The
crux
of
it
is
that,
because
our
friends
and
at
the
mouse
have
continued
to
extend
a
copy
rate,
it's
not
that
huge
of
a
deal,
but
the
etiquette
are
the
best
practices
they
ever
made.
One
is
there:
if
you
update
a
file,
you
can
add
the
project
copy
rate,
but
not
remove
the
original.
Well,
you
could
you
could
do
it,
but
it's
the
the
etiquette
would
be
to
just
add
it.
F
G
Subcommittee,
the
this
sort
of
other
topic
is
on
nine
two
contributions
which
we
don't
have.
An
answer
to
right
now
is
and
I
think
came
up
in
the
last
compound
meeting.
Is
what
what
you
and
I
think
Dan
pointed
out.
We
could
come
up
with
what
we
think
we
would
like
and
have
the
lawyers
make
recommendation.
The
only
thing
I
would
add
is
it
was
the
most.
G
It
was
a
very
educational
meeting
and
I
think
that
they
would
probably
make
a
recommendation
if
we
would
like
them
to,
but
it's
probably
gonna
be
the
same,
recommending
the
lawyers
that
gave
us
that
advice
worked
for
Microsoft
and
IBM
I
believe
the
one
talk
to
the
law
firm.
That's
escaping
me
that
there's
a
lot
of
the
startup
stuff,
but
it
was
really
good
at
feedback
and
Karen.
G
B
C
C
B
K
That's
where
this
issue
comes
in
is
that
last
time
we
talked
about
some
of
this,
and
the
specific
takeaway
was
that
if
we
want
to
make
some
requests
from
legal
that
it
would
be
better
if
we
went
into
that
prepared
with
some
of
some
of
the
examples,
and
so
that's
where
that
issue
is.
If
we
have
good
examples,
we
should
add
them
to
that.
Yeah.
F
A
Well
and
see
it
would
need
the
user
feedback
would
need
to
be
dual
license,
probably
or
at
least
like
to
have
that
data
be
specifically
licensed,
especially
since
I
went
through
the
LF,
because
we
collected
that
I'm
struggling
to
think
of
his
name
starts
with
the
G.
Thank
you.
So
we
collected
that
through
the
LF
and
that
might
require
that
they
license
it
in
a
certain
way.
I.
E
E
E
G
E
F
G
A
I,
just
I
just
put
a
list
of
five
different
repos
that
are
like
kind
of
different
variations
of
what
we
would
want
to
license:
badges
i18n,
no
gist
collection,
website,
redesign
and
use
your
feedback.
So
you
know
that's
those
are
kind
of
examples.
We
can
point
them
to
we're,
probably
happy
to
talk
to
through
that
I
can
and
I
know.
Many
people
in
here
can
as
well
Oh
Olivia's
here.
F
Maybe
them
couple
of
us
who
are
interested
in
this
should
follow
up
in
an
email
with
Mark
afterwards,
then,
because,
generally
speaking
with
lawyers,
they
don't
want
to
just
dig
into
the
code
base.
They
want,
like
the
short
gist
of
the
things
that
you're
looking
for
and
how
it
gets
used,
because
they
can't
necessarily
glean
that,
from
looking
at
the
repos
yeah.
G
E
E
D
A
The
time
because
I
know
there's
also
some
current
members
who
have
shifted,
and
this
isn't
necessarily
an
optimal
time
either
for
them.
So
that
might
be
an
action
item
that
we
should
take
to
reassess
what
this
works
or
if
this
time
works
for
us.
So
sorry
that
habit
that
miscommunication
happened,
Olivia
Audis
didn't
even
consider
it
so.