►
From YouTube: Node.js Community Committee
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Thanks
everyone
for
joining
us
for
another
node.js
community
committee
meeting.
This
is
for
it's
gonna
happen
again,
the
thursday
october
1st
I
had
to
look
at
my
it's.
A
It
is
yeah
if
you
are
a
member
or,
if
you're
in
the
meeting
directly
and
you
want
to
go
ahead.
Oh
yeah,
oh,
oh,
I
thought
sorry,
michael.
I,
the
red
hat
parentheses
made
it
yeah.
A
A
We
can
go
ahead
and
get
started
with
the
agenda,
so
we
we
do
have
a
extremely
light
agenda
today.
So
I
think
what
we're
going
to
be
doing
is
talking
a
bit
about
we're,
going
to
go
over
announcements
and
updates
and
then
do
that
agenda
item,
which
is
just
kind
of
a
heads
up
request
and
then,
from
there
talk
about
issue
639
in
the
comic
repo,
which
is
an
activity
in
compcom
in
its
future
from
there.
We
should
be
good
to
go
see
here.
This
is
okay.
A
So,
let's
start
with
initiative
updates.
A
I
guess
I'll
start
with
that.
I
I
took
some
time
on
tuesday,
I
believe,
to
sit
down
and
go
through
the
open
examples
prs.
So
I've
spent
some
time
doing
that
looks
like
we're.
Making
progress
on
them
specifically
there's
two
one
for
express
and
then
one
for
ibm
cloud
functions.
A
I
think
there's
also
two
for
fastify
those
are
pretty
close
to
done,
and
then
I
left
a
decent
amount
of
feedback
on
the
others
yeah,
so
those
should
be
able
to
get
merged
and
we
should
be
able
to
have
our
first
kind
of
set
of
of
prs
there.
C
B
All
right,
I
can
go
for
mentorship.
I
think
this
is
probably
a
pretty
big
section,
so
we
we
have
three
really
good
candidates
for
the
examples
team
jeremy.
We
sent
those
over
to
you
with
our
yes,
you
did
number
one
top
pick,
but
I
figured
a
short
list
approach
was
better.
B
A
Yeah,
apologies
for
not
getting
back
to
you
on
that
sooner
here.
I
I.
I
am
swamped
right
now,
but
yes,
I
I
I
will
get
to
you
back
to
you
about
that
by
tomorrow.
Probably.
D
B
Ideally,
ideally,
you
know
a
mentee
who's
all
set
to
help
we'll
get
you
some
of
that
time.
Back.
D
I
I
can
go
next,
that's
okay,
hello,
everyone.
I
hope
everyone's
doing
well.
It
feels
like
I
haven't
spoken
with
everyone
in
a
long
time,
but
from
the
website
redesign
team.
We
are
making
progress.
However,
I
have
been
noticing
a
few
things
that
have
come
up,
which
you
know
I
would
like
to
address,
but
it
would
be
better
if
you
could
also
address
it
later
in
a
private
session,
just
because
there
are
things
that
you
know
were
anonymous
to
me
and
ben
and
ben
created.
D
Those
issues
which
was,
I
know,
trini
saw
it
was
creating
new
pages
such
as
having
micro,
diagnostics
and
stuff
like
that,
and
I
had
brought
up
the
issue
that
we
don't
have
design,
so
you
know
to
have
it
as
follow
a
design
language
or
have
someone
actually
create
designs
and
then
submit
them
before
creating
those
pages.
But
you
know
things
were
created
and
I
was.
D
I
was
extremely
swamped
with
deadlines
at
work
and
I
wasn't
able
to
check
the
pr's
at
that
time
and
you
know
things
got
merged,
and
so
you
know
things
of
that
nature
have
been
taken
place.
So
I
really
wanted
to
actually
see
like
what
would
be
the
next
best
steps
in
terms
of
getting
those
things
sorted,
because
I
don't
want
us
just
randomly
creating
pages
and
then
their
next
thing
you
know
they're
the
main
pages
that
we
actually
need.
D
People
to
be
working
on
or
need
to
be
done
are
not
getting
done
and
we
have
other
like
five
or
six
pages,
that
we
need
to
figure
out
whether
they
follow
everything
and
whether
they're
actually
needed
and
so
forth.
Another
second
thing
is
that,
since
I
think
the
past
three
weeks
they
have,
we
have
been
trying
to
change
the
meeting
time
because
we
did
notice
that
from
thursday
to
wednesday
at
1800
utc,
so
I
will
need
to
get
access
to
change
the
time.
So
that
way,
you
know
more
people.
D
E
D
D
18
1800
utc,
so
that's
what
they
we
said.
We
decided
okay,.
D
A
In
that
case,
we
will
also
set
aside
some
private
time
at
the
end
also
said
like
10
minutes.
Hopefully
do
you
think
that'll
be
enough.
A
Okay,
cool
any
other
initiative
updates.
A
I
I
pinged
ben
for
an
initial
update,
one
second,
on
internationalization.
A
Stephen
cool,
so
it
looks
like
they're
trying
to
get
more
involved
with
g11
in
which
is,
I
think,
globalization
which
is
now
part
of
the
node
internationalization,
repo
or
node
i18n.
Repo
alexander
may
be
free
it
up
for
some
some
more
time
on
the
infrastructure
side
of
things
soon
and
they're
looking
to
connect
with
internationals
or
the
website
redesign
folks
again
soon.
A
C
C
We
have
this
concept
of
at
large
projects,
impact
projects
and
growth
projects
and
growth
implies
that
there
is
some
growing
happening,
so
we've
been
kind
of
exploring
that
and
figuring
out
like
growth
plans
for
projects
and
even
taking
it
a
step
further
and
trying
to
figure
out
if
growth
makes
sense
for
a
project
or
if
it
should
maybe
be
a.
C
You
know
like
a
phase
for
any
project,
they
can
ask
to
have
more
resources
to
grow
in
some
certain
way,
whether
they
are
at
large
or
impact,
so
anyway,
we're
kind
of
working
through
some
of
that
stuff.
Beyond
that
moving
the
individual
supporter
program
forward,
which
is
pretty
interesting,
I
recommend
you
take
a
look
at
that
if
you
haven't
yet
it's
in
the
proposal
directories
there's
some
interesting
stuff
going
on
there,
including
this
concept
of
javascript
landia,
which
is
a
kind
of
fun.
C
Little
thing
engage
folks
with,
and
what
else
are
we
working
on?
I
feel
like.
I
should
always
have
a
list
in
front
of
me,
instead
of
just
trying
to
pull
it
out
of
my
head,
but
michael
or
tierney.
If
there's
anything
else
that
comes
to
mind
that
you
think
we
should
raise,
I
mean
I
guess
the
collaboration
network
is,
is
almost
complete.
E
Yeah,
so
that
thunderboard
vote
should
be
landing
soon.
I
think
yeah
in
terms
of
like
you
know
the
things
we're
forgetting.
If
you
subscribe
to
the
jury's
mailing
list,
you'll
you'll
get
the
comprehensive
set,
so
it's
I
think,
most
important
if
we
just
bring
here
things
that
are,
you
know,
could
affect
the
project,
and
I
don't
think
I
can't
think
of
too
much
beyond
what
joe
has
been
mentioning.
C
Cool
some
licensing
stuff,
you
know,
but
that's
I
think
I
think
that's
fine
for
this
group.
E
Sort
of
more
guidance
and
documentation
is,
I
think
that
was
something
that
might
be
worth
mentioning
is
they
did
mention
that
the
standards
working
group
was
kind
of
going
through
a
it
sounded
to
me,
like
a
reimagining
like
hey?
What
should
we
focus
on?
We
could
do
that
kind
of
stuff.
So,
if
you've
ever
had
an
interest
on
that
front-
or
you
know
we're
wondering
what's
going
on-
it
might
be
a
good
time
to
listen
in
to
get
some.
It's
probably
a
good
opportunity.
C
E
I
don't
have
anything
to
to
bring
back
from
the
board
and
I
don't
have
anything
on
the
list
that
I'm
aware
of
that.
You
know
new
things
that
that
need
to
be
taken
back.
We
are
still
waiting
for
some.
You
know
guidance
on
things
like
you
know,
dco
handling,.
A
A
A
A
E
E
A
E
E
We've
been
through
well,
I
wouldn't
say
that,
like
there's
an
interpretation,
but
over
time
you
know,
there's
and
having
joined
the
the
openjs
foundation,
it's
a
good
time
to
revisit
that
and
improve
things.
So,
hopefully
we're
getting
close
to
the
point
where
we'll
have
some
tooling.
That
helps
us.
Do
that
and
we'll
need
to
implement
across
the
the
repos
okay,
the
way
I'd
put
it
but
yeah.
A
Yep
sounds
good
anything
else
that
we
need
to
discuss
or
anything
on
that
specifically.
A
In
that
case,
we
should
move
on
to
the
one
agenda
item.
This
is
specifically
issue
551
in
admin.
I've
put
it
in
the
zoom
chat.
This
is
just
a
request
to
add
a
slack
web
hook.
I
have,
I
guess
I
don't
need
to
say
this
here.
I
have
no
address
to
this,
but
we
should
take
a
look
at
this
because
I
believe
it
needs
some
some
approvals
from
comic-con
members.
A
We
should
be
fine
there
we
go
and
we'll
remove
the
agenda
label
cool
yeah.
So
if
you
have
time
review
that
give
it
feedback
perfect,
okay,
so
I
guess
we
are
going
to
use
the
rest
of
this
time
by
the
way.
Thank
you
to
whoever's
been
taking
minutes
greatly
appreciated,
going
to
use
the
rest
of
this
time
hold
on.
Let
me
just
add
a
note
here
in
minutes.
A
A
So,
let's
we
can,
we
can
kind
of
go
ahead
and
get
started
with
that.
One
thing
I
will
ask
is
just
if
people
if
people
can
like
well
they're,
not
speaking,
help
take
notes.
It's
super
helpful
okay,
so
I
guess
where
do
we
want
to
start
like
what
are
the
things
we
find
valuable
in
this
discussion?
And
I
know
I'm
the
person
who
who
kind
of
created
the
issue,
but
I'd
really
like
to
get
other's
perspective
on
it,
and
you
know
thoughts.
E
Right
I'd,
even
just
add
to
that,
like
is
the
current
level
of
activity,
a
problem.
A
Yeah,
that's
fair
I'd.
I'd
also
look
at
yeah
so
for
for
context,
for
those
who
are
like
watching
on
stream
or
otherwise
like
listening
the
the
questions
that
joe
pasted
were
like
should
comcom
continuing
to
exist.
What
benefit
is
comcom
currently
providing?
What
is
its
overarching
purpose?
A
D
A
Comcom
was
initially
started
because
or
in
node
around,
like
the
sense
that
we
really
do
care
about
the
community,
and
we
want
to
enable
it
and
kind
of
do
do
a
lot
of
work
to,
or
there
was
a
group
of
people
who
wanted
to
do
work
to
continue
to
enable
the
community
and
give
it
more
both
give
it
a
voice
and
have
some
kind
of
focus
within
the
project
since
core
at
the
time
wasn't
super
engaged
externally,
like
it
was
very,
very
kind
of
closed
off.
Maybe
that's
not
the
best
phrasing.
A
There
was
a
set
of
people
who
kind
of
worked
on
core
and
getting
past
the
barrier
of
getting
into
that
set
of
people
and
like
getting
into
a
space
where
core
was
something
that
you
could
come
and
work
on,
or
you
know
we
could
get
feedback
for
core
effectively
was
was
a
much
higher
barrier
than
I
think
it
is
now.
I'm
not
saying
it's
not
a
high
barrier
still,
but
you
know
I'm
not
passing
any
kind
of
judgment
on
that.
E
Think
yeah,
like
what
I
added
to
that
was
you
know.
I
think
the
motivation
was
for
a
stronger
voice
for
community
growth
and
support
for
non-technical
work,
yeah
right
and
what
you,
what
you
describe
is
is
kind
of
one
of
the
reasons.
Maybe
you
know
that
fed
into
why
that
was
needed,
but
the
the
the
real
motivation
was
to
was
like.
E
We
wanted
a
stronger,
stronger
voice,
and
you
know,
at
least
from
my
perspective,
on
those
areas
and
that's
what
the
community
comcom
was
was
sort
of
formed
to
focus
on
without
having
to
have
people
like
either
try
and
and
change
the
role
of
the
technical
securing
committee.
To
do
that
right,
yeah,
it
was
like
place,
you
know,
create
a
create
a
place
where
people
who
were
interested
in
that
side
of
things
could
collaborate
and
give
it
a
voice.
E
A
A
And
I
I
think
that
we've
we've
done
a
pretty
decent
job
of
that
with
various
various
kinds
of
things:
yeah
and
we've.
You
know,
I
think,
we've
definitely
evolved
over
time
and
found
things
that
work
and
things
that
don't,
and
I
think
that
that
art
also
largely
is
a
factor
of
folks
who
are
around
and
able
to
invest
time
and
energy.
A
Like,
I
think,
a
lot
of
you
know
the
things
that
we
would
consider
successful
have
been
because
there's
there's
been
someone
to
participate
and
meaningfully
engage
in
that
which
I
I
am
not
surprised
by,
like.
I
think
that
that
makes
sense.
So
I
I
guess,
is
an
extension
of
that.
One
of
the
things
that
I
I
have
seen
more
recently
I
mean
there's
two
things.
Actually
two
things
there's
just
been
one
there's
been
less
activity,
and
so
that
kind
of
velocity
has
slowed,
which
is
not
a
judgment
or
bad.
A
It
is
currently
a
shared
space,
but
what
I
more
mean
is
like
having
a
lot
more
of
the
work
done
in
that
repo
could
potentially
be
a
a
positive
future.
I
guess
where,
like
yes,
comcom,
exists
and
and
runs
these
things,
but
like
more
of
the
like
governance
work
lands
in
that
repo
and
like
we
can
move
both
of
our
governance
in
there
or
something
like
that.
A
Like
kind
of
merging
the
efforts
but
still
having
the
two
distinct
groups
into
a
single
space
is
something
that
I've
thought
about
and
talked
with.
Dsc
members
about
and
I've
you
know
talked
with
a
couple
com,
a
few
comcom
members
about
it
too.
A
But
like
thinking
about
thinking
about
things
like
that
around,
like
is
there
an
adaption
of
how
we
want
to
work
and
work
with
the
projects
like
the
broader
project
outside
of
comcom
is
something
that
I'd
also
like
to
kind
of
like
have
on
the
table
a
bit
or
have
like
we
don't
need
to
cons.
I
guess
stay
within
the
the
bounds
of
what
we've
currently
done
if
we
think
that
there's
a
more
effective
path
for
us
to
work.
E
Right,
I
guess
the
like,
I
think
the
the
challenge
and
angst
is
probably
about
the
thing
that
we
have
the
same
problem
with
on
the
technical
stirring
committee.
Side
too,
is
available
people,
time,
yup
and
people
with
the
time
to
really
spear
ahead
and
lead
work
right,
yeah,
and
I
guess
the
there's
kind
of
two
aspects
to
that
right.
If
there's
I
don't,
if
we
don't
have
people
who
are
sort
of
saying
hey,
I
want
to
lead
and
charge
forward
in
a
particular
area.
E
E
So
there's
the
kind
of
things
like
it's
a
shame,
we're
not
doing
stuff
that
you'd
really
like
to
do,
but
on
the
flip
side,
if
we
can't
find
anybody
interested
enough,
you
know-
maybe
it's
not
a
big
enough
problem
that
we
have
to
solve
it
right-
or
I
guess
I'm
just
sort
of
wondering
as
well.
E
Like
there's
things
that
are
like
real
problems,
which
we
think
are
doing
like
harm-
and
you
know
those
are
the
kinds
of
things
that
if
the
com
com
isn't
jumping
on
and
figuring
out
how
to
resolve,
then
we
have.
We
definitely
have
a
problem
and
then
there's
things
where
we'd
really
like
to
do
more.
E
So
I
guess
that's
part
of
like
you
know
we
could
think
about
is
like.
Are
there
things
that
really
like
are
must-haves?
That
aren't
happening,
because
you
know
that
would
be
an
area
where?
Okay,
maybe
we
need
to
figure
out
and
focus
on
like
the
time
that
we
do
have
in
these
meetings
on
like
those
are
truly
problems,
and
that
you
know
we
need
to.
E
C
I
mean,
I
think,
that's
a
good
question
like
what.
What
do
we
think
more
of
should
be
happening
is
kind
of
a
question,
but
I
also
wanted
to
just
say
something:
I've
been
thinking
about
is
that
we
have
a
few
people
on
this
call
that
are,
you
know
newer
to
the
space,
at
least
than
you
know,
michael
myself,
tierney
and
even
rachel.
C
C
That's
an
invitation,
but
don't
don't
feel
any
pressure,
but
yeah.
So
I
guess
my
question
stands,
though,
like
what?
What
do
we
think
specifically
is
lacking?
I
mean
I,
I
think
that
there's
some
busy
work
that
that
that
needs
doing.
That
would
be
helpful
if
you
know
some
folks
jumped
in
on.
You
know
an
obvious
one
is
the
meeting
minutes,
but
also
you
know
tierney,
and
I
have
kind
of
collected
some
other
things
in
the
past
that
that
should
be.
C
C
E
Right,
like
that,
that's
sort
of
where
I
was
I
was
coming
to
as
well
like
the
some
of
these
other
questions
like
should
it
continue
to
exist,
like
is,
is
the
you
know
the
stronger
voice
for
community
growth
and
support
for
non-technical
work?
I
don't
think
that's
changed,
necessarily
right,
so
having
a
place
where
people
can
come
and
try
and
advocate
and
lead
for
things
is
probably
still,
at
least
in
my
mind,
still
makes
sense.
E
D
C
Divya,
you
know
tierney,
you
have
four
bullet
points
in
this
original
issue.
Do
we
want
to
talk
about
those
sure.
A
Let
me
open
it
up
because
I
have,
I
usually
am
not
a
tabs
person.
I
have
so
many
tabs
open
right
now,
it's
not
a
good
time
yeah.
So
the
four
points
I
had
just
for
a
refresher
and
I'll
put
the
link
again
in
the
it's
in
that
you
already
the
four
points.
We're
currently
have
a
handful
of
members
who
don't
immediately,
engage
in
hong
kong
work
outside
of
being
a
member
and
occasionally
commenting
on
issues
and
attending
meetings.
A
I
think
that
has
somewhat
self-fixed,
I
think
maybe
one
or
two
left,
but
no
I
don't.
I
don't
really
even
think
that
you
know
we
have
have
a
limited
number
of
or
we
we.
You
know
that
was
a
a
problem
previously.
You
know,
I
think
that
that's
just
like
a
at
this
point
with
our
current
membership,
that's
a
ability
to
dedicate
work
time
to
it
and
things
like
that
and
it
goes
in
and
out
for
some
people
like
not.
A
Everyone
is
in
the
position
that
joe
and
I
and
michael
are
which
is-
and
I
think
rachel
too.
You
know
which
is
relatively
privileged
in
our
ability
to
contribute
during
work.
So
you
know,
I
think
that
has
relatively
solved
itself
with
some
of
the
folks
who
are
completely
inactive
kind
of
stepping
out.
You
know
into
emeritus.
A
Sorry,
I'm
just
reading
this
again
yeah.
So
one
of
the
things
that
one
of
the
challenges
that
I
faced,
I
I
have
faced
you
know
having
been
chairperson
for
I
think
three
years
or
two
years
now
and
then
you
know
either
going
into
third
or
fourth
has
been.
A
Has
been
that
the
way
things
were
originally
set
up
was
meant
to
be
very.
It
was
meant
to
follow
the
path
that
node
originally
set
out.
I
think
it
was
largely
defined
by
michael
rogers,
which
was
basically
if,
if
you
come
in
and
if
you
kind
of
participate,
you
you
become
a
member
and
then
you're
there
forever
like
there's
no
there's,
there
was
never
a
path
to
onboarding
and
like
even
at
the
time
when
michael
kind
of
had
michael
rogers,
not
michael
dawson,
when
michael
had
set
this
up.
A
That
was
a
a
thing
that,
like
I
had
identified
to
him
as
a
challenge
of
like
well,
if
someone's
like,
either
actively
detracting
or
because
we
have
this
consensus-seeking
model,
we
generally
want
a
larger
number
of
people
to
respond
if
we
can't
get
10
of
the
people
what's
the
path
here.
I
think
that
this
this
was
kind
of
a
slight
evolution
of
that
of
how
we
ask
people
to
step
down
and
if
they
have
any
kind
of
response,
that's
not
a
affirmative.
Yes,
I'm
gonna
step
down.
A
A
I
think
that
that
should
probably
be
refined
a
bit
just
because
it
would
allow
us
to
kind
of
focus
on
what
we're
doing
as
a
group
without
having
to
have
additional
concerns
of
like
cool
we're,
trying
to
get
consensus
or
feedback
from
someone
or
a
vote
from
someone
who
hasn't
been
super
active
and
like,
despite
saying
they
they'll,
try
to
be
active,
hasn't
but
hasn't
been
able
to
make
that
happen,
and
so,
like
I,
I
think
that
that's
one
thing
that
needs
to
be
refined
is
like
that
has
been
a
consistent
challenge,
as
chairperson
for
years
is
just
how
to
deal
with
that
in
a
way,
that's
like
useful,
because
nobody
is
well
outside
of
recently.
A
Nobody
has
when
I
followed
up
with
them
on
that
there
was
never
a
yes,
I
I'll
I'll
I'll
back
off
off
of
this.
E
E
A
That's
fair
and
I
I
guess
that
the
thing
I
would
say
is
that
it
would
it's.
It
is
an
administrative
overhead
that
I
think
we
should
probably
like.
It
is
a
moderately
dysfunctional
strategy
and
like
if
it's,
if
it's
just
me
that
goes
in
and
does
this
work
to
address
this-
I'm
totally
fine
with
that.
A
But
it
is
something
that
I
I
think
would
be
beneficial
for
us
to
change
both
in
terms
of
that
and
then
just
in
general.
Looking
at
how
our
governance
stocks
work
and
seeing
if
there's
improvements,
because
there's
like
I
mean
honestly,
there's
there's
yeah
the
final
bullet
point.
There
is
many
of
our
core
documents
are
obviously
outdated
and
you
know
I
I
have
brought
this
up,
but
neither
myself
nor
others
have
meaningfully
worked
on
this.
Like
I,
I,
when
I
started
getting
involved
in
comic
con.
A
That
was
one
of
the
things
I
did.
A
lot
of
was
maintain
those
documents
that
has
kind
of
fallen
fallen
off,
as
I
have
to
take
on
other
things
and
like
do
other
things
in
comcom
and
in
the
project
in
other
projects,
and
it's
something
I
can.
I
can
try
to
pick
up
again,
but.
C
So
I
think
you
know
perhaps
these
light
agendas
we've
had
for
the
last
few
meetings
are
a
bit
of
a
gift,
and
maybe
we
should
be
taking
these
meetings.
You
know,
do
the
agenda
and
then
start
working
through
some
of
these
things.
I
think
you
know
just
going
through
the
docs,
as
a
group
might
be
good
and
and
one
person
can
kind
of
be
taking
notes
or
opening
issues
or
even
start
editing.
E
Right
like,
like,
I
think,
it's
it's
you
know
just
based
on
the
suggestion.
It's
like
it's
one
thing
to
say:
okay,
we've
got
a
meeting
every
two
weeks
we
can
come,
we
can
provide.
You
know
you
can
participate
in
that
async
things
then
take
another
level
of
of
commitment
right
or
you
know
finding
the
time
among
your
people's
busy
days
and
so
combining
those
two
like
there's
things
that
you
want
to
do.
The
meeting
is
useful
for
just
because
you
can
quickly
like
hey,
there's
this
problem.
E
C
Yeah
and
I'll
just
wrap
up
by
saying
I
you
know
sometimes
like
I.
I
understand
that
that
there's
a
lot
in
com
com,
documentation
that
is
outdated
and
I'm
a
little
overwhelmed
by
it.
So
that's
like
a
little
bit
preventative
for
me,
but
if
we
just
started
to
look
at
it
as
a
group
and
peel
off
little
bits
here
and
there,
then
I
think
people
would
be
more
encouraged
to
be
like.
Oh,
I
can.
I
can
take
care
of
that.
You
know
and.
A
A
E
C
Yeah
yep
yeah,
so
I'm
happy
to
like
you
know,
work
on
it
here
and
then
peel
off
actionable
items.
I
think
that'll
be
really
great.
A
D
I
I
my
recommend.
My
feedback
is
basically
done.
I
I
think
that
is
a
very
good
suggestion
if
we
can
actually
use
the
time
and
make
it
more
productive
in
these
meetings
and
if
we
feel
that
we're
going
to
be
able
to
get
somewhere
and
get
things
done
in
a
more
cohesive
manner,
then
I
am
all
up
for
it
and
here's
the
thing
like
we
can
give
it
a
try
like.
C
Yeah,
I
think
it
could
be
too
a
way
for
people
who
are
newer
to
comcom
to
to
get
more
familiar
with
with
some
of
the
you
know,
the
internal
workings
and
to
get
more
involved.
Frankly,
I
would,
I
would
propose
that
we,
you
know,
throw
a
high
level
issue
or
maybe
multiple.
If
we
can
capture
a
couple
of
areas
that
we
want
to
start
addressing,
and
you
know
we
can
just
start
working
on
them,
and
if
we
had
an
issue
too,
we
could
we
could
drop
in.
C
A
A
I
think
that's
a
good
idea.
Sorry,
I
I
have
a
lot
of
sensory
input
right
now.
Yeah,
I
think
that's
a
good
idea
and
I
I
think
I
can
also
like
for
what
it's
worth.
I
can
probably
go,
spend
some
time
and
go
through
and
create
issues
for
each
of
the
distinct
things
that
need
to
work
that
I
I
see
that
need
to
be
done.
A
E
I
I
was
I
was
just
saying:
top
of
my
head
is
like.
Maybe,
let's
create
one
issue
with
a
list
of
things
because
otherwise
we'll
be
complaining.
We
have
too
many
issues
right.
If
you
know
what
I
mean
like
like,
let's
actually
open
issues,
maybe
as
we
plan
to
work
on
them
like
yeah,
maybe
it
doesn't
make
sense,
I'm
just
like
saying:
let's
not
create
a
bunch
more
stuff
that
we
then
have
to
figure
out
whether
we've
closed
or
opened.
C
C
Only
a
little
bit,
though,
and
and
tierney
you
know,
I
would
just
say,
because
I
know
a
lot
of
this
work
falls
on
you.
You
know,
don't
start
with
high
level
stuff
and
let
us
all
know
get
get
involved
and
spread
the
work
out
yeah.
A
C
And
just
to
update
a
mod
while
you're,
looking
we're
talking
about
the
inactivity
and
com
com
issue
and
the
kind
of
consensus
is
that,
since
we've
been
having
light
agendas
that
we
will
use
the
comcom
meetings
to
start
to
work
on
some
of
the
things
that
we
think
we
need
to
work
on
and
like
the
documentation
and
process
and
stuff
is
one
thing
that
we
think
we
could
start
to
tackle.
As
a
group.
A
A
Seven
current
meeting
agenda
issues
that
are
open
and,
like
certain
prs,
sometimes
go
or
just
don't
get
attention
really
like
kind
of
have
to
ping
people
to
get
them
in.
So
I
I
don't
really
know
a
solution
to
that.
I
think
that's
largely
a
function
of
attention
and
time
or
like
available
time.
A
One
thing
that
we
could
potentially
do
at
least
for
prs,
is
like
have
a
random
assignee
thing:
that'll
just
assign
a
like
balance,
who
it
assigns,
issues
to
or
pr's
do
randomly
and
allow
allow
us
to
at
least
potentially
get
a
triage
in
and
and
spread
that
work
around.
It's
not
like
it's
a
particular
particularly
high
load
of
prs
that
we
get
like.
A
I
have
the
only
open
one
right
now
and
it's
blocked
on
a
downstream
dependency,
because
I
want
to
do
markdown
link
checking
since
we
have
a
lot
of
dead
links
or
we
I
I
often
find
dead
links.
I
don't
think
we
have
a
lot,
but
I
I
sometimes
find
them
but
yeah.
You
know
something
like
that
might
might
help
out
with
just
in
terms
of
like
us
and
being
able
to
because
it
generally
it's.
A
It
generally
seems
like
when
I
ping
people
it
gets
looked
at
so
having
an
automated
ping
or
like
automated
assignee,
maybe
could
be
helpful
there,
but
maybe
that's
just
me
trying
to
find
a
solution
to
it
in
a
way
that
isn't
actually
solution
to
the
the
thing
that
we're
trying
to
solve.
A
Okay,
what
time
are
we
at
okay?
I
said
we'd
leave
ten
minutes
at
the
end
for
private
session,
so
I
will
go
ahead
and
do
that.
I
will
end
the
stream
now
thanks
you
all
for
for
joining,
and
we
are
going
to
ask
non-com
com
members
to
dip,
except
for
divi.
Who
is
the
one
who
brought
up
the
the
private
discussion,
so
I
will
actually
yeah
hold
stick
around
for
just
a
minute.
I'm
gonna
end
this
stream
thanks.