►
From YouTube: Community Committee Meeting
Description
A
B
A
D
There
you
go,
can
you
yeah,
so
sorry
cause
I've
been
a
bit
late,
so
in
the
last
meeting
we
had
a
lot
of
fun.
We
had
like
four
new
members
who
were
interested
in
contributing
and
we
talked
about
how
we
can
start
approaching
the
community
committee.
The
community
not
m,
be
paid
the
new
community
page
for
the
outreach
and
it
looks
like
three
of
them
have
already
started
working
on.
You
know
writing
the
content
for
that
new
page
so
that
that
really
was
at
most
of
the
questions
were
around.
D
A
Also
did
Oscar
make
it
to
that
meeting.
I
was
interested
in
Johan
know,
you
know,
so
we're
gonna
have
one
more
joining
next
time,
Oscar's
been
helping
with
design
and
website
redesign,
and
we
went
on
a
tangent
last
meeting
of
talked
about
this
in
the
update.
He's
gonna
come
join
and
help
make
the
community
page
it
fit
in
with
the
rest
of
the
rest
of
the
site,
as
we
keep
talking
about
content
in
structure
so
awesome
joining
instant
awesome,
very
cool
user
feedback
dan
shot.
E
E
E
A
E
E
No,
it
isn't
doing
anything
for
me
in
the
way
that
you
know
I
expected
to
move
forward.
Yeah
we've
been
able
to
sort
of
help.
Support
tooling
we've
been
able
to
support
the
the
community
sentiment
around
promises
around
workers
and
alignment
with
the
broader
web
platform
and
that's
chugging
along
the
more
esoteric
and
advanced
needs
of
you
know.
Companies
operating
node
at
scale
is
still
a
pain
point.
E
B
Thing
I'd
like
to
discuss
with
this:
is
you
know
from
what
Dan
just
kind
of
talked
about
it
does
seem
like
you
know,
we've
identified
that
maybe
user
feedback
is
useful,
but
not
in
the
form
it
currently
exists,
and
that
might
be
a
good
indication
that
we
might
want
to
retire.
It
in
favor
of
something
else.
Specifically,
you
know
Dan
rich
and
that
content
and
like
actually
knowing
what's
happening
in
the
product
is
really
important
and
something
that
we're
lacking.
B
So
perhaps
you
know
didn't
putting
that
as
a
an
effort
of
the
notice
collection
could
be
a
thing,
but
you
know
one
of
the
things
we're
facing
here
is
we
don't
have
enough
people
that
are
interested
in
this?
It
seems
like,
and
if
we
don't
have
enough
people
I.
Definitely
don't
us
to
be
spinning
our
wheels
on
something
that
isn't
gonna,
be
effective
and
is
just
gonna,
make
us
stress
out
more
and
actually
be
detrimental
to
Hong
Kong
as
a
whole
and
I'm
not
saying
that
specifically
about
user
feedback,
but
mostly
about
like
I
I.
B
Think
we,
as
a
committee,
should
probably
try
to
be
trying
to
work
toward
getting
a
little
bit
better
about
identifying
things
that
either
aren't
working
or
should
be
reassessed
and
from
that
deciding
to
move
on.
And
you
know
act
quickly
rather
than
act
so,
which
is
typically
the
approach
we've
taken
in
the
past.
Yeah.
A
Then
you
you
identified
kind
of
two
two
areas
that
user
feedback
has
been
has
historically
tackled.
One
is
enterprise.
Feedback
which
sounds
like
does
have
valuable,
like
concrete
bits
of
advice
that
comes
out
of
it,
and
the
other
is
just
providing
context
for
kind
of
the
general
user
who
doesn't
necessarily
have
specific
asks,
and
if
they
do,
they
open
up
issues
the
technical
side
of
things,
but
otherwise
are
just
looking
for
more
information.
That's
a
credit.
That's.
C
And
have
a
way
to
better
understand
how
things
we
were
changing.
We're
gonna
affect
our
end
users,
and
so
we
tried
a
number
of
different
ways
of
you
know
trying
to
get
its
all.
You
know
what
I'd
hoped
in
the
beginning
is
we'd
end
up
with
a
regular
group
of
users
that
we
could
go
and
bounce
things
off
of
and
a
little
bit
like
what
Dan
was
saying.
You
know
provide
some
of
the
context
of
hey
here.
Some
of
the
things
are
going
on
in
the
in
the
project.
Doing
with
any
of
these
of
concern.
C
A
F
E
E
A
A
Very
valid
outcome
of
that
meeting
should
also
be
considering
retiring
it
or
change
them
in
significant
way.
So,
let's
you
know
deconstructed
and
put
back
together
in
the
way
that
that
would
best
fit
and
awesome
moving
along
Eva
I
think
you,
you
said
you
can
actually
give
an
update
on
the
mentorship,
meaning.
H
A
H
B
F
There
has
been
no
more
babies
of
me
the
last
week.
I
have
a
PR
open,
which
I
want
all
of
you
to
review
for
the
update
in
the
process.
I
had
like
two
discussion
with
Richard
and
we
summarized
the
new
process,
its
opening,
that
we
are
just
waiting
for
the
reviews
and
then
we
can
find
the
positive
Percy
Fawcett
and
that.
A
Is
PR
number
37
in
the
nodejs
collection?
We
go
awesome,
let's
all
dive
onto
that,
so
that
we
can
finally
close
issue
for
39
in
comic
all
just
been
open
for
quite
a
while
awesome
and
then
website
redesign
update.
We
had
other
my
opinion
very
fun.
Meeting
last
time.
Oscar
came
in
and
walked
us
through
his
latest
high
fidelity
mocks,
which
are
looking
awesome.
A
So
he's
he's
gonna
knock
out
the
the
last
few
bits
of
that
in
the
next
two
weeks
and
we'll
actually
have
a
full
high
fidelity
mock
to
build
the
rest
of
the
site
off
of
so
yeah.
The
the
walk
through
and
design
feedback
took
the
lion's
share
of
the
meeting,
and
that
was
largely
all
we
covered,
otherwise
just
got
a
key
pack
in
a
way
at
the
actual
development
side
of
it,
of
which
there
are
call
out.
There
are
some
meaty
tickets.
A
If
somebody
is
excited
about
architectural,
you
know
major
architectural
things
to
really
dig
your
teeth
into
feel
free
to
dive
in
I.
In
no
js'
dev
is
the
repo.
So
there's
a
yeah
a
lot
of
a
opportunity
for
ownership.
There
there's
the
the
large
issue
should
be
easy
to
find
there
at
the
top
of
the
issue,
queue
and
there's
a
pretty
good
technical,
like
RFC,
for
each
one
for
how
to
implement
so
yeah
awesome
and,
let's
get
one
more.
Actually
it's
a
good
segue
Joe
want
to
do.
G
Short
short,
so
I
wasn't
actually
at
the
last
meeting.
Reviewing
notes
and
talking
to
jewelry
I
think
I
get
a
good
handle
on
sort
of
progress.
We've
had,
which
you
know
we
need
weekly.
So
we
are,
you
know,
have
a
look
at
Kingston
and
have
pretty
good
progress
each
week
tweak
a
few
smaller
things
that
the
bigger
things
I
want
to
just
highlight
is
that
were
working
on
infrastructure
working
group
that
can
help
address
the
infrastructure
needs
for
the
open,
TSM
foundation.
G
That's
thinking
about
you
know,
nodejs
infrastructure,
as
well
as
all
projects
that
came
over
from
the
J
sound
Asian,
so
lots
of
work
there
if
anybody's
interested
in
infrastructure
I
strongly
encourage
you
getting
involved.
August
26
is
the
next
meeting
at
1800,
UTC,
first
meeting.
Actually
standards
working
group
is
another
meeting,
another
group
that
we're
trying
to
get
started.
So
if
you
have
any
interest
in
standards,
JavaScript
standards
and
the
like
w3c
as
well,
August
27th
at
1800
UTC
is
our
next
meeting.
That's
been
happening.
G
The
node.js
interactive
schedule
is
out
now
I'll
mention
and
then
a
couple
of
other
things
that
I
want
to
make
sure
I
bring
to
light.
Our
muwah
is
the
idea
of
bringing
the
code
and
learn
and
the
collab
summits
up
a
level
to
the
open
desk
foundation
and
kind
of
opening
that
up
the
last
codon.
The
last
collapsed
summit
was
was
more
open
and
I
think
it
was
really
productive
and
really
great
and
I
think
you
know
most
people
are
happy
to
see
more
faces
involvement
from
different
areas.
G
G
G
A
C
I
asked
in
the
last
two
meetings
you
know
said
it's
here.
If
you
have
any
objections,
you
know
raise
now
or
reach
out
to
me
or
Matteo
comment
in
the
issue,
and
it's
just
you
know.
Since
we
haven't
heard
anything,
you
know
the
assumption
is
it's
good
to
go
with
unless
somebody
raises
an
objection
in
one
of
those
ways:
yeah.
A
B
G
B
On
that,
like
I,
just
kind
of
run
out
push
the
open,
jess
side
forward.
You
know
if
we
could
say
maybe
do
that
in
the
next
like
next
four
days
by
like
Monday.
That
would
be
awesome
just
so
we
can
have
like
a
conclusion
data.
Okay,
we're
gonna,
be
done
with
this
and
become
effectively
approves
at
that
point.
Yeah.
A
C
G
G
G
B
Occupation
around
I
mean,
if
you
have
still
a
couple
of
more
minutes,
I
think
it'd
be
helpful
for
Jo.
If
you
could
explain
what
kind
of
people
in
prep
meetings
are
looking
for
and
the
Sanders
meetings
are
looking
for,
I
think
people
might
be
aware
in
the
passing
that
these
are
happening,
but
they're
not
really
sure
if
their
skillset
or
their
interests
align
yeah.
G
That's
it
that's
thanks
for
highlighting
that
me
know
so
regarding
infrastructure.
Obviously,
if
you
have
an
interest
in,
you
know
maintaining
infrastructure
test
infrastructure.
You
know
a
variety
of
infrastructure
needs
there,
please
reach
out
to
us,
but
also,
if
you
I
mean
we're
trying
to
encourage
folks.
We
don't
want
this
to
land
on
like
one
or
two
people,
and
then
they
like
carry
the
burden.
G
C
They
sorry
I
just
add
to
that
one
that,
even
even
if
you're
not
like
the
people
who
know
how
to
run
the
infrastructure,
but
actually
would
be
you
know
in
a
project
who
would
consume
it.
Yeah
I
think
having
those
people
involved
also
would
be
good
in
terms
of
you
know,
figuring
out
what
is
it
that
would
be
good
to
have
a
sort
of
a
shared
resource
available?
What
kind
of
things
are
interesting
not
interesting,
that
kind
of
stuff?
E
G
That's
a
part
of
the
conversation
for
sure
and,
and
you
know
one
thought
that
came
about
was
maybe
the
group
figures
out
what
the
plan
for
it
is
and
then
we
try
to
hire
someone
execute
on.
You
know
the
initial
implementation
or
something
or
perhaps
hiring
someone
to
help
manage
it.
That's
definitely
a
part
of
the
conversation,
but
you
know
we're
working
through
it
and
in.
G
Yeah
thanks
then
I'm
I'm
on
my
phone,
so
I
can't
pop
a
link
in
there
but
yeah.
If
you
look
up,
if
you
look
in
there,
you
together
find
it
easily
on
the
standard
side
like
I
mentioned,
we're
talking
about
ACMA,
related
standards,
tc39
and
the
like,
as
well
as
w3c,
and
right
now
we're
at
the
very
early
stages
and
trying
to
identify.
G
You
know
what
we
think
our
deliverables
back
to
to
the
CPC
and
to
the
community
and-
and
you
know,
trying
to
figure
out
what
the
champion,
what
we
would
expect
from
a
champion
of
this
sort
of
group
who
would
leave
this
group
and
so
we're
pretty
early
on
if
you
have
any
interest
in
standards,
whether
it's
the
JavaScript
respect
or
you,
three
work,
please
get
involved.
Even
if
it's
just
a
you
know,
passing
interest,
you
want
to
just
see.
G
What's
going
on,
join
the
meetings,
you
know
we,
we
have
a
variety
of
communities
that
are
underneath
the
open,
J's
Foundation
umbrella.
Now,
so
we're
trying
to
figure
out
how
we
we
serve
them
well
in
this
sort
of
situation.
But
it's
it's
fairly
blank
slate
at
the
moment
and
trying
to
figure
out
what
what
that
would
look
like.
A
A
Moving
right
along
so
next
up
on
the
agenda
is
the
ticket
I
opened
a
couple
days
ago.
This
is
issue
518
soft
nominations
for
community
committee,
chairperson,
so
I
based
this
ticket
and
the
form
and
the
process
after
how
it
went
last
year,
so
should
look
fairly
familiar,
but
I
wanted
to
first
call
out
that
self
nominations
are
open.
So,
if
you're
interested
in
helping
run
this
panel
in
this
group,
I,
please
throw
your
name
in
there.
A
The
processes
in
the
ticket
NASA
wanted
to
open
it
up
to
questions
for
both
me
and
tyranny,
who
served
in
this
role
last
year
about
any
details
on
the
role
that
that
you
might
have
questions
about
from
both
our
experiences.
We
both
left
comments
in
the
thread
itself,
but
I
want
to
open
up
the
floor
for
outstanding
questions.
How's.
A
A
Yeah
no
I've
I,
at
least
from
you
personally,
it's
been
the
Edmund
flow
of
both
node
work
and
work.
Work
and
other
extracurriculars
has
been
fun
too
to
juggle.
So
there
is
there's
a
lot
of
active
management,
especially
when
helping
run
run
these
meetings
and
be
a
steward
for
the
community
committee
I.
A
A
For
myself
the
last
few,
the
last
couple
months,
my
time
has
gotten
tighter
and
it
got
noticeably
tougher
to
to
be
that
that
active
steward
here
so
I.
Keep
that
in
mind
as
you
as
you
consider,
throwing
your
name
into
the
ring.
But
at
the
same
time
it
is
fulfilling
and
wonderful
and
like
this
is
it's
a
beautiful
committee
and
a
beautiful
community,
and
you
know,
bless
him
to
be
a
part
of
it.
That.
B
B
B
A
B
Yeah
and
the
the
thing
to
keep
in
mind
is
it's
not
it's
not
open
source
in
the
way
that
either
being
the
normal
comb,
comb
ever
is
or
contributing
to
open
source
is
where
it's
not
a
commitment.
That
was,
you
know.
One
thing
I
tried
to
emphasize
a
lot
when
I
was
chair
was
that
you
know
please
take
care
of
yourself.
You
know
if
you're,
leading
it
an
initiative
or
working
with
others.
B
It's
okay,
if,
like
you're
going
a
little
bit
slower
than
you'd
like
or
something
like
that
in
this
role,
it's
a
little
bit
different,
because
there's
a
lot
of
things
that
are
ending
up
relying
on
you
and
it
does
become
like
a
part-time
job.
There
there's
a
lot
of
things
and
it's
not
something
that
I
would
ever
advise
anyone
to
kind
of
see.
A
F
A
A
Excessive
on
the
side
and
I
am
entering
a
new
phase
of
that,
where
I
will
probably
need
to
dedicate
the
atman
time.
I
have
been
over
the
past
two
months,
have
less
been
dedicating
to
node
and
I
need
a
shift
that
elsewhere
as
I
get
a
new
bench.
Er
up
and
off
the
ground.
I
will
still
be
engaged
in
the
in
the
community
and
contributing
to
initiative.
A
Website
redesign
and
outreach,
but
I
do
need
that
that
time
back
personally
and
I
also
think
it's
very
healthy
for
communities
like
this
to
to
find
your
leadership
cycle
new
leadership
in
and
out
it
keeps
here
new
said
a
it
keeps
you
from
experiencing
the
burnout
and
in
a
role
and
helps
get
new
blood
and
in
your
activity
and
new
excitement
in
the
group.
So
I
want
to
also
help
foster
foster
that
in
the
next
cycle,
yeah.
So
it's
it's
time
for
the
next
phase.
I
think.
F
A
Awesome
well
as
much
as
I
enjoy
getting
compliments,
barring
any
other.
Any
other
points
on
this
issue,
we'll
we'll
move
on
to
the
next
one.
Just
please,
if
you,
if
you
haven't
interested
it
or
if
you
want
to
talk
on
the
side
about
the
role
or
your
own
thoughts,
hopes
or
concerns
with
with
putting
your
name-
and
you
know,
talk
to
me
on
the
side
or
just
submit
your
name
to
the
nomination
form,
be
happy
to
happy
to
see
it
in
there.
J
B
So
I
think
just
scaffolding.
Scaffolding,
this
out,
is
an
initiative,
since
we
have
had
buy-in
from
Hong
Kong
weird
it's
going
about
it
a
different
way
than
we
usually
usually
do
with
initiatives.
I
can
PR
that
so
I'll
comment
I'll
commit
you
today.
Yeah
I'll
do
that
today.
So
I'll
PR,
that
into
the
org.
B
Outside
of
that,
though,
I
think
that's
the
majority
of
the
work
that
needs
to
be
done
there
I
I,
do
appreciate.
I
do
just
want
to
say,
I
appreciate,
Rachel
for
being
very
open
and
willing
to
work
with
us
as
we
kind
of
evolved.
This
I
know
she's
been
working
on
it
for
quite
a
while
and
I
really
appreciate
her
patience
with
us
and
in
trying
to
make
this
something
that
everyone's
happy
so
but
yeah
yeah
yeah
I
am
too
I'm
really
really
excited
for
it.
It's
gonna
be
an
awesome
thing,
so.
A
I
projects
not
I,
was
just
opening
up
for
for
final
comment:
awesome
looking
forward
to
a
journey,
it's
gonna
be
good.
Okay.
Next,
up
on
the
I
want
to
call
out
that
it
shifted
the
agenda
around
a
little
bit
here,
because
we
addressed
that
issue.
439
know
Jess
collection
in
our
initiative
check
in
and
basically
take
a
look
at
the
PR.
So
we
can
close
that
issue.
A
The
Charter
update
to
reflect
new,
open,
Jas
foundation
is
still
pending
unless
tyranny
you
have
taken
a
stab
at
it
I
believe
a
month
ago
now
we
agreed
to
meet
on
the
side
and
and
not
get
out
together,
but
we
didn't
get
on
together.
So
we
will
maybe
do
that
this
this
next
week,
I
and
by
maybe
I
mean
we'll.
Definitely
do
it
this
next
week,
all
right,
Ernie,
yeah,
yeah,
sounds
good
to
me.
Okay,
cool
I'll,
see
you
a
message
for
what
awesome
that
leaves
one
last
agenda
item
on
here.
This
issue
number
507.
A
K
So
yeah
last
meeting,
like
I,
really
appreciate
how
everybody
was
very
welcoming
to
the
issue.
Again,
it's
a
very,
very
difficult
to
pin
down
thing.
It's
it's
I,
guess,
good
to
just
say
that
last
meeting
we
agreed
maybe
to
explore
the
idea
of
opening
an
issue
to
start
an
initiative,
I'm
actually
still
traveling
I'm
gonna
be
back
at
the
end
of
the
month
or
maybe
early
September.
Actually
so
just
you
know
on
the
footnotes
from
last
meeting.
K
I
actually
just
mentioned
what
the
issue
will
likely
be
called
I
added
on
like
a
little
check
checklist
item,
I'm
also
recommending.
Maybe
we
have
a
discussion
thread
and
slack
because
it
will
be
hard
to
you
know:
collaborate
on
this.
Just
by
you
know,
commenting
with
slack
I
guess
you
know,
people
can
have
more
context.
K
A
K
K
So
so,
let's
say
you
know
a
quick
summary.
A
year
ago,
I
have
difficulties
interacting
when
I
joined
modules.
Some
of
it
you
know
learning
some
of
it
do
two
things
I'm
hardly
able
to
learn.
Let's
put
it
this
way,
it's
beyond
learning,
but
you
know
a
year
ago,
I
wanted
to
be
proactive,
make
some
recommendations,
attack
change
quickly.
That
was
really
you
know
something
that
was
clear
how
to
go
about
it.
So,
a
year
later,
I
collected
some
insights
I'm
sure
there
are
other
people
who
find
it
difficult
to
use.
K
We
have
to
collect
an
input
and
you
know,
seek
people,
respect,
privacy
and
knowing
how
to
you
know,
improve
communication
so
that
it's
inclusive,
not
just
language
barrier
or
you
know
color
and
font
size,
and
all
these
you
know
awesome
things
that
are
taking
front
and
center,
but
also
you
know,
interaction,
styles,
personalities,
emissions.
You
know
a
lot
of
bad
communication
comes
in
the
form
of
emissions
or
short
cuts.
K
You
know,
and
one
example
I
gave
was
the
idea
of
okay
you're
frustrated
walk
away,
but
the
other
side
doesn't
really
know
if
you're
frustrated,
if
you
made
sense,
if
they
found
you
know,
distraction
like
context
becomes
very
critical,
so
maybe
I'm
walking
away
and
then
walk
away
would
be
just
a
very,
very
small
change
to
that.
I
guess
you
know.
K
A
I
mean
interacting
with
a
project.
The
size
of
Otis
is
certainly
in
intimidating,
especially
if
you're,
not
you
might
have
a
different
communication
style
or
a
different
different
approach
than
the
people
already
ingrained
in
the
conversation.
So
even
beyond
just
a
barrier
to
entry
from
you
know
digesting
that
drinking
from
the
fire
hose
sort
of
put
it
even
beyond
that
barrier
to
entry
of
catching
up.
There's.
How
do
you
engage
what's
the
and
how
do
we
make
sure
that
everybody
can
can
have
their
voices
heard
there?
Yeah
I
agree.
A
That
is
a
huge,
huge
hurdle
love
to
brainstorm
ways
like
concrete
steps.
We
can
do
to
maybe
add
add
some
structure
at
some
architecture
to
the
way
these
meetings
are
run
or
how
how
they're
communicated
that
that
we
can
actually
like
implement
and
have
a
have
a
goal
in
mind
for
how
to
how
to
open
up
that
access,
whether
that's
a
you
know,
do
trainings
or
guidance
for
for
meeting
hosts
or
a
better
communication
of
how
how
how
things
are
currently
run
and
and
how
you
can
get
involved
like
do
we.
K
Your
participation-
and
you
know
saturated
with
you
know,
just
you're,
always
ready
to
be
frustrated
that
you
couldn't
get
your
point
across
and
but
against
meetings
are
really,
you
know,
are
an
Avenue
that
far
more
accessible,
especially
you
know
additional
cues,
you
get
visual
cues
audio
cues,
you
could
say
no,
no,
actually
I
want
to
interrupt
and
say
something,
and
these
these
are
all
things
that
money
to
actually
assist
with
issues.
So
when
there's
an
issue
in
people
choose
to
discuss
the
slide,
I
find
that
such
issues
actually
improve
in
their
direction.
K
A
C
A
bit
of
a
little
bit
balanced
because
I
think
there's
some
people
who
much
prefer
communication
through
github
and
the
fact
that
it's
documented
and
then
there's
other
people
who
prefer
getting
together
and
closing
the
loop
and
it's
finding
that
right
balance
to
to
sort
of
help.
Everybody
who's
got
different.
Communication
styles
participate.
A
So
did
you
find
it
like
difficulty?
It
sounds
like
you
prefer,
the
you
personally
prefer
the
the
meeting
communication
style
and
this
in
person
talking
over
over
github
github
issues
and
PRS
for
specifically
for
resulting
and
kind
of
bike
shedding
moment.
You
find
it
difficult
to
find
these
meetings
or
I.
K
Think
I
prefer
that
in
these
meetings,
I
don't
always
get
no
I'm.
Sorry
I
didn't
understand
what
you
said.
Could
you
repeat
that
and
yet
so
when
you
write
something-
and
you
take
an
hour
to
try
to
get
it
right
and
you're,
not
sure
whether
or
not
it's
really
misunderstood
or
you've
overdone
it
trying
to
explain
something
without
without
cues,
sometimes
you
feel
that
no
me
didn't
understand
that
point
being
sometimes
abused
and
insert
the
conversations.
K
Obviously
it's
not
always
the
case,
but
when
it
is
the
case,
it
becomes
extremely
offensive
as
well
being
told
that
okay
understand,
because
you
know
the
point
is
contradictory
to
a
flow,
so
so
in
meetings.
It
really
helps
because
people
actually
somehow
get
the
message
more
and
more
clearly
I
hope
at
least
that's
my
assumption,
whereas
in
you
know
when
you
have
to
type-
and
you
have
to
edit
your
own
typing,
because
you
make
a
mistake
or
two
people
at
least
get
emails
that
are
different
from
what
you
intended
to
you
know
communicate.
K
So
it
is
really
about
you
know,
exploring
what
actually
can
be
done.
Unfortunately,
the
you
know
there
isn't
an
immediate
action
item
other
than
to
coordinate
and
have
an
you
know,
a
discussion
sure
other
people
who
are
who
have
more
experience
can
help
structure
a
good
initiative,
and
you
know
we'll
see
where
it
goes
from
there.
K
If
we
could
affect
one
thing,
I'm,
gonna
repeat
it
again:
we
should
have
a
sort
of
an
emoji
score
or
an
emoji
tax
people
who,
just
you
know
some
use
thumbs
up
all
the
time
and
not
really
or
thumbs
down,
and
not
really
express
why
they.
You
know
why
they
seem
to
agree
or
disagree.
They
don't
contribute
really
to
an
argument.
K
B
Was
just
gonna
say
like
there,
it's
interesting
to
kind
of
see
like
the
arc
of
this,
because,
like
previously
in
no
decor
at
least,
there
was
a
very
long
period
where
people
would
just
add
+1
as
a
comment,
rather
than
like
actually
using
a
reaction,
and
so
as
far
as
I
know,
we
actually
try
to
push
people
more
toward
using
a
thumbs
up
when
they're.
They
agree
with
something,
rather
than
just
commenting
like
a
useless.
A
It
sounds
like
the
Plus
Ones
aren't
necessarily
the
the
issue.
It's
the
it's,
the
like
the
Downloads,
without
an
explanation
of
why
I
can,
without
that
extra
conversation,
pushing
the
conversation
forward,
and
this
might
be
just
again
coming
up
with
with
ideas
that
might
actually
that
might
be
concrete
ways
to
help
improve
this.
A
A
lot
of
it's
hard
to
facilitate
these
conversations
a
lot
of
the
time,
especially
when
there's
a
huge
number
of
people
piling
into
a
conversation
for
the
people
who
are
helping
run
these
initiatives,
these
groups,
it
can
be
difficult
to
dive
in
and
help
guide
the
conversation
in
a
healthy
direction
and
so
providing
a
set
of
recommendations
for
facilitators
and
actually
having
best
practices
for
how
to
how
to
help
elicit
that
that
feedback.
When
you
know,
if
you
see,
if
you
see
a
Down
vote,
especially
asked
like
why,
why
do
you
oppose
is
like?
A
K
K
Building
being
called,
but
you
from
certain
people,
you
know
they're
using
it
really
as
a
star
or
you
know
like,
and
you
know
that
they
are
using
it
to
express
that
align
with
the
opinion
of
the
other
person
repeatedly.
That
is
not
really
voting.
That
is
more,
like
you
know,
yeah
yeah
and
we're
all
on
one
side,
you're,
not
really
on
this
side.
They
have
more
votes
here,
but
there
is
no
vote.
There's
an
argument
right
so.