►
From YouTube: Community Committee Meeting
Description
A
A
B
Guess
I
can
add
one
on
the
user
feedback.
Last
meeting
we
discussed
it.
It
you
know
then,
is
stepping
down
as
champion.
We
agreed
to
you
know,
consider
a
couple
things
going
forward.
One
is
Jose
opened
a
proposal
to
move
the
survey,
part
of
the
work
that
that
team
was
doing
up
to
the
open,
jeaious
foundation
level,
since
it
makes
you
know
it's
something
that
could
be
useful
to
the
other
projects
as
well
and
there's
a
you
know,
a
good
fit
with
working
with
the
foundation
team
members.
B
B
We
won't
meet
and
you
know
basically
put
those
on
hiatus
until
if,
when
you
know
somebody
has
more
time
to
pick
it
up
and
lead
it
or
we
decide
that,
like
we're,
basically
slide
we're
not
going
to
be
doing
anything
active
going
forward
other
than
those
those
two
other
parts
dan
did
ask
the
you
know
did
point
out.
We
needed
somebody
to
be
the
liaison
between
the
you
know:
the
the
enterprise
user
feedback
groups,
so
I
volunteered
to
do
that.
B
A
I
think
it'd
be
interesting
to
see
if
you
know
they're
interested
in
continuing,
if
any
of
them
who
are
actively
doing
work
and
participating
in
that
are,
you
know,
would
fit
or
would
be
interested
in
fit
the
bill
for
coming
up
and
helping
him
come
come
and
representing
it
there
and
also
becoming
a
pump--ow
member
and
stuff
like
that.
I
think
that's
a
dub
since
that's
the
kind
of
path
we
baked
in
the
most
recent
changes
to
that
it'd
be
nice
to
see.
If
we
can
maybe
encourage
that
yeah.
That
would
make
sense,
cool.
C
Have
one
for
the
outreach
initiative
we
actually
in
the
last
couple
of
meetings,
we
have
had
a
couple
of
new
contributors
Osaka
and
saw
fillol,
so
we
have
started
to
pen
down
the
community
page
content
in
the
outreach
initiative
in
the
deposit,
get
a
policy
for
that
and
we
have
kind
of
have
made
the
outline
and
now
moving
towards.
You
know
writing
that
content
in
contributing
that
to
not
just
a
tough.
So
anyone
if
you
would
like
to
contribute
there
you're
more
than
welcome
in
this
issue
awesome.
Thank
you.
E
F
F
We
have
a
new
one
new
pair
up
and
study
first
September
and
George,
because
and
some
issues
that
we're
having
that
the
new
mentors
don't
have
the
necessary
knowledge
on
kids,
so
like
poor
requests
and
other
stuffs
all
right
person,
the
what's
the
minimal
tech
information
that
the
matters
the
amenities
should
have
indicator
and
discuss
if
the
new
subscription
for
the
next
cohort,
instead
of
applying
it
to
a
Google
Form,
we
use
a
full
request,
so
big
subscription
or
a
git
repository.
That's
what
we
were
discussing.
I,
don't
don't
remember
if
we
have
another
thing.
E
E
Plenty
of
people
to
be
mentored.
The
irony
is
the
people,
the
the
first
round
there
were
I
think
there
were
ten
mentors.
We
have
seven
mentees,
but
three
of
the
mentees
that
were
chosen,
never
responded
to
the
email,
and
so
we're
trying
to
remedy
that
and
get
I
mean.
There's
there's
plenty
of
men
to
use
so
just
go
through
that
next
round,
gotcha.
A
Now
that
the
emerged
as
an
initiative
and
it
links
a
repo
that
doesn't
exist
so
the
next
steps
there
are,
you
know,
we've
we
got
approval
on
that
issue
and
we
can
move
into
next
steps
of
going
ahead
and
creating
the
various
you
know
next
next
steps
so
creating
the
repo
to
read
me:
updating
the
announcement
blog
posts
to
reference
staff,
readme
and
repo,
and
then
should
the
vlog
post
so
should
be
able
to
proceed
on
that.
I
can
dedicate
some
time
to
speak
to
trying
to
get
that
up.
G
G
We
have
a
few
projects
that
are
in
the
process
and
I
think
a
couple
that
are
nearing
an
application
and
you
know
we're
working
through
some
of
the
details
of
you
know
clarifying
somebody
tells
the
product
process
I'm,
not
sure
what
else
is
you
know
important
to
bring
up
the
moment,
attorney
Michael
anyone
else,
yeah.
G
B
B
B
D
A
So
next
agenda
or
the
first
agenda
item
rather
is
the
community
committee,
chairperson
self
nominations,
I
believe
that's
an
older
issue
that
did
not
get
removed
or
closed
when
it
probably
should
have
been
I
believe
we
had.
We
self
done
that
the
self
combination
is
closed.
At
this
point,
I
was
apparently
the
only
person
who
submitted
so
I
believe
by
default.
That
goes
to
me,
I'm,
not
sure,
but
I
am
not
comfortable
being
the
person
to
say
that
in
any
way.
B
Just
looking
at
the
issue
itself,
you
know
I
can
see.
The
last
comment
is
is
that
you
know
he
sent
out
a
vote
for
a
link.
Yeah
basically
it'll
be
like
you
know:
okay,
I
didn't
see
that
all
right
and
once
that's
complete,
you
know
I
think
you'll
be
confirmed,
and
but
that's
the
final
step
I
think
in
terms
of
making
it
official
cool,
perfect.
D
A
A
H
H
A
C
A
In
the
nodejs
yeah
community
sock,
so
one
piece
of
people
can
have
on
that.
We
previously
have
gone
down
the
path,
private
channels
in
a
couple
cases,
and
those
have
been
like
self-selected
calm.
Calm,
specifically
like,
as
the
community
committee,
opted
not
to
have
our
discussions
in
private
channels.
A
H
A
A
B
E
A
B
It's
the
only
thing,
I
say
that
be
aware
of
us.
There
was
a
proposal
for
a
charter
template
interesting.
So
it's
worth
looking
at
that
before
you
stood
you
dive
into
it.
Okay,
cool
I
mean
I
I.
Similarly,
like
once
once
that's
formally
approved
you
know,
I
might
have
to
think
about
whether
or
I
need
to
update
the
one
on
the
TSC
or
side
or
not.
Doesn't
doesn't
necessarily
mean
that
we
do,
but
it's
just
that
that's
there
for
projects
yeah.
A
A
A
A
Cool
next
agenda
item,
we
talked
about
a
little
bit:
noches
social
media
community
collaboration,
see
this
is
just
on
the
agenda
now,
as
I
said,
I
merged
the
PR
that
I
created
last
our
last
meeting.
It's
been
two
weeks
since
it's
been
open,
there
was
rules
when
it
had
emerged
it
next.
Steps
are
to
create
the
repo,
as
was
outlined
in
the
PR,
and
then
from
there
create
a
readme,
they
kind
of
outlines
what
the
project
is
or
what
the
initiative
is
so
I
can
give
that
update
in
the
issue.
B
A
B
A
Guess
every
child
probably
speak
to
this,
maybe
a
little
bit.
My
guess
would
probably
be
like
a
month
out,
I'd
say:
probably
it
will
be
able
to
ship
it
next
next
meeting
and
then
the
meeting
after
that
we'll
be
able
to
have
I,
don't
know
how
long
Rachel,
how
long
was
the
actual
forum
suggested
to
be
open
for
in
the
blog
post.
I
I
want
to
say,
we've
kept
it
open
for
at
least
a
week,
but
I
think
it's
I
think
we
can
kind
of
decide.
It
I
mean
I'm
comfortable
with
a
week,
and
if
we
want
to
basically
lling
that
we're
not
getting
enough
traction,
we
can
keep
it
open
for
a
little
bit
longer
and
then,
of
course,
we'll
have
to
go
through
the
self
nominations
and
choose
you
know
who
learns
is
the
best
candidate?
Sometimes
we
want
to
kind
of
gonna
look
at
that
tail
end.
As
far
as
like
the
selection
process,
yeah.