►
From YouTube: Node.js Community Committee Meeting
Description
A
A
So
we
have
a
ten
items
on
our
agenda
today
and
we
are
also
going
to
be
ending
a
little
bit
early
for
a
private
session.
Just
to
let
everyone
knows
that
the
stream
will
probably
be
ending
around
12:40.
Okay,
so
Before
we
jump
into
agenda
items.
Do
the
initiatives
have
anything
to
share
report?
Let
us
know
about
I.
A
I
will
share
a
quick
report
from
the
moderation
team
as
we're
supposed
to
so
over
the
past
week
or
two
weeks
it
doesn't
look
like
there
was
any.
There
was
on
April
23rd.
There
was
a
user
that
was
blocked
for
spamming,
the
get
up,
I,
don't
know
if
that
was
within
the
last
two
years
or
not
so
beyond
that
nothing
to
report
there.
A
Okay,
I'd
also
real
quick,
like
to
share
an
update
from
the
website
working
group,
not
working
initiative
website,
redesign
initiative
that
we've
kind
of
agreed
to
that
we
are
complete
in
the
information
architecture,
phase
of
what
we're
doing
so
now
we
are
moving
on
into
the
design
phase,
and
shortly
here
we
will
be
putting
out
a
call
for
designers
effectively
we're
still
working
on
how
to
do
that
most
effectively
and
like
make
sure
we're
not
creating
too
much
churn
and
doing
too
much
design
by
committee.
A
But
that
is
something
that's
on
our
radar
and
we're
figuring
out
how
to
do
that
most
effectively
right
now.
We
you
know
we
would
prefer
to
go
down
the
path
of
Community
Design,
but
if
needed,
we
can
go
down
the
path
of
foundation
design
so
and
and
by
that
I
mean
you
know,
getting
funds
from
the
foundation
to
hire
a
contractor
to
tell
bus,
because
we
do
have
a
wireframe
already.
We
do
have
quite
a
bit
of
content
mocked
out,
so
we
just
really
need
the
design
layer
on
top
of
that
journey.
C
You
know
different
sort
of
lens
and
the
Foundation
and
Community
Design.
You
know
I
just
wanted
to
note
that
we
we
have
the
foundation
that
just
went
through
and
landed
a
design.
Are
we
paying
attention
to
that
and
as
we
build
this
out
to
you,
know
coordinated
that
level
as
well,
so.
A
The
design
was
from
the
Linux
Foundation
kind
of
template,
and
then
you
know
iterated
on
with,
like
the
note,
some
of
the
notice
colors
and
things
like
that,
the
the
mock-ups
that
we
have
had
so
the
the
wireframes
sorry
that
Adam
has
created
we're
pretty
significantly
different
and
I
couldn't
be
easily
done
in
the
the
framework
that
the
foundation
is
done.
It's
basically
the
default
Linux
Foundation
framework
for
game
design.
So,
yes,
it's
been
considered
and
I,
don't
think
we
we'd
love
to
have
you
know
more
unification.
There
I
don't
know.
D
A
Cool
so
in
there's
the
no
just
build
repo
bots
and
apps
in
the
org,
so
this
is
something
I,
an
issue
I
created
and
I
added
the
CC
agenda
label,
because
this
has
come
up
a
few
times
recently.
Unfortunately,
we
don't
have
kind
of
the
stakeholders
here
that
I
was
hoping
we
would.
But
you
know
the
kumkum
has
a
few
different
areas,
we're
getting
understanding
around
bots
or
they
want
to
use
bots
in
the
org.
A
The
github
board
for
one
purpose
or
another
actualization
is
one
and
then
I
believe
there
is
one
under
website
redesign
or
something
around
that
I
could
be
mistaking
that,
but
basically
getting
a
getting
an
update
on
how
we
can
start
doing
that
because
I
know
quite
a
bit
of
work
was
done
previously
around
that,
and
this
is
more
just
as
an
FYI
right
now,
I,
don't
know
there
hasn't
been
any
updates
or
comments
in
the
issue.
So
I
will
kind
of
follow
up
on
that
at
pain,
but
yeah
there's
not
been
any
additional
work
there.
A
B
I
haven't
seen
anything
recent
on
that.
Okay,
well,
you
know
I
guess
it's
it
come
by
and
I
haven't
looked
at
that
one
particular,
but
it
comes
down
to
what
privileges
does
the
bot
need
I.
Think
I'd
read
in
the
past
that
there
you
know
yeah,
Hotch
I,
just
don't
have
enough
context.
I
want
going
yeah.
A
Okay,
yeah
so
I
think
you
know
just
if
anyone
does
have
contacts
there,
they'll
be
super
helpful.
Oh
I'll
follow
up
again,
I
guess
one
one
question
that
I
have
Michael
is:
is
that
the
right
repo
for
that
he's
had
a
good
repo,
cuz
I
was
kind
of
what
Williams
said.
It
was
like
the
final
blocker
was
the
build
refo,
and
so
that's
right,
but
that
yeah.
B
I
mean
that
it's
it
kind
of
comes
to
like
if
it's
something
we
need
to
do
out
of
what
we've
normally
agreed
to
you
know
it's
maybe
more
of
a
TSE
question,
or
you
know,
as
opposed
to
strictly
build
like
build,
would
be
like
okay.
Technically,
we
need
to
give
privileges
or
not,
but
if
there's
a,
if
there's
not
agreement
that
that's
generally
something
we
do,
which
I
think
there
was
like
the
boat's
policy,
that's
kind
of
said
no
right,
yeah.
A
B
A
I
could
be
wrong
I
could
that
could
be
different
Reid.
There
could
be
a
different
reason,
but
it
would
be
very
helpful.
It's
like
that
could
be
documented,
I,
guess
and
I.
This
isn't
the
first
or
the
third
or
the
fifth
or
the
tenth
time.
I've
been
asked
about
this,
like
there's
quite
a
few
people
who
want
to
be
able
to
do
things
around
this
and
we're
in
it
just
not
having
it's
less
documentation.
This
is
kind
of
an
understanding,
yeah.
B
A
A
B
Think
that's
the
right
spot,
because
I
think
once
once
there's
agreement
in
that
group
that,
yes,
we
can
do
it,
then
you
know
on
the
build
side.
I
don't
know
exactly
who
would
do
it,
but
it's
much
easier
because
it's
not
really
it's
more
of
I
just
do
work
as
opposed
to
you
know,
figure
out
if
it's
okay
or
not
yeah.
A
C
A
A
A
B
B
B
So
the
proposal
was
that
actually
we
just
get
get
rid
of
the
wiki
move.
What
information
is
appropriate
into
the
node.js,
org
and
I?
Think
it's
probably
on
the
agenda
here
is
sort
of
an
FYI
in
that
you
know,
I
think
the
wiki's
actually
already
been
disabled
and
you
know
the
plan
is
to
move
in
people
can
move
whatever
info
they
find
that's
missing
over.
Is
that
thing
gotcha?
Okay?
If
anybody
in
you
know
in
calm,
calm
has
objections
or
whatever
it.
You
know
that
was
sort
of
an
FYI.
On
that
side.
Awesome.
A
E
A
B
A
Awesome,
okay,
so
I
think
we
can
take
that
off.
The
air
I
took
it
off
the
agenda,
but
we
can
move
on
to
the
next
agenda.
Item
trouble.
Funds.
The
next
item
is
in
odious.
Admin,
travel
fund,
approval,
I'm,
being
careful
about
funds
available.
I
think
this
is
we
just
haven't
taken
it
off
the
agenda.
Do
you
know
if
yeah
this
is
a
while
ago?
Tracy
do
you
know?
Food
is
still
needs
to
be
on
the
agenda.
Oh,
we
know.
F
D
Yeah
totally
I
think
it's
just
yeah
it's
it's
like
it's
not
like
behind
closed
doors.
It's
just
like
nothing
that
the
community
committee
I
think
at
this
point
needs
to
it's
just
Jim,
getting
to
work
with
the
foundation
team.
Okay,.
D
I
will
ask,
is
Michael
would
probably
be
the
best
person
for
this.
Has
the
TSC
moved
forward
with
the
treasurer?
Do
we
need
to
open
an
issue
saying
like
hey
we're
doing
this
on
I
know
there
had
been
a
little
bit
of
discussion,
but
no.
B
Nothing
formal
has
been
done
to
me
not
last
last,
as
I.
Remember
in
that
discussion
is,
you
know
we
knew
Jim
had
volunteered
miles
to
sort
of
push
back
on.
We
need
somebody
in
the
foundation,
so
I
think
the
next
step,
in
my
mind,
would
be
to
write
down.
Here's
like
a
PR
or
something
into
the
admitting
to
be
managed.
Yeah.
D
D
So
the
reason
that
we
have
treasurer's
in
general
is
because
they
have
to
be
able
to
provide
the
context
to
the
foundation
so
that,
like
Tracy
and
Anne,
don't
have
to
dig
all
of
that
stuff
up
and
so
like
a
treasurer
from
con-com
and
a
treasure
from
the
TSC
are
the
ones
who
are
positioned
to
say.
Yes,
these
people
are
active
in
the
community.
D
You
know
I'm
making
sure
that,
like
our
group
in
particular
is
aware
and
approving,
because
like
we're
both
the
TSE
and
kumkum,
you
know
I
think
the
rules
is
set
right
now.
Is
that
like,
if
they're
from
the
TSE
or
if
they're
from
the
calm
calm
like
someone
from
that
group,
tends
to
+1
it
because
they
have
the
context
versus
someone
from
like
the
larger
project?
Alright,.
D
F
G
H
B
Be
in
favor
to
just
say
you
know:
we've
got
the
one
treasurer
who's
gonna,
do
this
and
and
I
my
guess
is
everybody
will
be
happy
to
have
Jim.
Do
that.
If
people
act
during
the
PR,
then
we
can,
you
know,
go
from
there,
but
otherwise
and
and
I
guess
you
know
I'd
volunteer
to
say
if
there's
cases
where
that
doesn't
work,
you
know
Jim
can
reach
out
to
me
and
I'll
help
out
and
if
that
doesn't
end
up
being
the
right
thing,
we
can
always
change
later
on
yeah.
D
B
C
C
D
F
D
B
D
D
B
F
B
D
B
C
So
I
tried
to
raise
a
hand
if
I
could,
whenever
mannequin.
So
this
treasurer
role
that
were
circling
around
is
an
interesting
opportunity
for
us
to
invest
in
admin
and
have
it
be
not
a
calm,
calm
role
that
is
serving
the
compound.
But
you
know,
as
Tracy
is
articulating.
This
is
a
role
in
admin
and
you
know
begins
to
explore
that
cross-functional
space.
B
A
D
B
A
Think
I
already
did
I
mean.
Let
me
go
double-check,
but
I
I
think
I
did
already.
Unless
I
did
yes,
I
did
cool,
so
I
think
we're
good
on
that
I'm
glad
that
was
on
the
that
was
that
label
was
left
up,
because
if
we
had
that
significant
about
to
discuss
so
I
think
we
can
move
on
to
the
next
agenda
item.
Unless
anyone
else
is
something
they'd
like
that.
A
Okay,
so
next
item
is
another
item
that
probably
should
have
had
the
label
taken
off,
but
we've
had
a
little
bit
of
an
update.
The
comic-con
membership
call
for
feedbacks
on
new
definitions,
so
I
think
quite
a
bit
of
the
definitions.
I
have
gone
into
a
PR
that
has
been
it
broadly
accepted
by
by
the
community
committee.
The
membership
who
have
voted
on
it
and
it
looks
like
it's
all
approvals
sent
like
five
approvals
and
no
rejections.
A
A
A
That
said,
I
believe
because
of
how
long
it
was
open
and
because
of
the
number
of
approvals
there
wasn't
any
consider
it.
We
basically
followed
the
consensus
equally
model,
but-
and
there
weren't
objections,
so
it
actually
got
pushed
up
to
the
board
I
believe
and
they
discussed
it
beyond
that.
I
can't
your
a
lot,
but.
D
I
should
say
that
just
to
note
that
the
that
PR
is
like
there's
still
more
work
to
be
done,
I
think
that
there's
other
two
dues
and
further
pr's
like
even
that
what
we've
got
up
and
ready
to
merge
once
that's
been
green-lighted
from
as
like
also
approved
yeah.
It's
like
do.
We
have
other
work.
We
have
to
do
I.
Think
it's
already
been
noted
about
like
a
merit.
I
needs
further
detail.
There's
an
errata
errata.
Sorry.
However,
it's
pronounced
PR,
that's
gonna.
C
D
H
B
D
D
I
know
you're
right,
and
that
should
be
soon,
though
it's
just
unfortunate
that
we
do
have
to
wait
and
then
the
other
thing
I
think
two
out
of
this,
though,
if
we're
talking
about
and
Manila
should
be
able
to
talk
further
on
this,
as
well
as
we've
probably
got
some
other
work.
That
needs
to
happen
around
like
working
group,
language
potentially
or
like
other
sort
of
outside
of
like
definitions
of
I,
think
we
have
these
issues
but
outside
of
definitions
of
like
what
a
member
is
in
comm
and
how
you
get
there.
A
D
E
F
B
D
Good
point,
because
I
think
we
had
had
I
want
to
say
we
talked
about
this
before
where,
when
big
things
happen,
big
changes,
happen
and
I.
Think
Dan
may
have
actually
requested
this
prior
for
this
sort
of
subcommittee
that
we
document
this
in
like
a
history
markdown
file,
so
that
we
have
an
explanation
of
like
you
know
the
the
evolution
of
this
work
and
I
think
that
this
particular
PR
has
a
lot
of
those
strong
changes
in
it.
So
it
would
be
good
for
us
to
have
that
as
like
a
markdown
file
in
the.
A
A
Yeah
that
so
that
had
definitely
been
requested
before
and
I
was
the
one
who
tried
to
take
it
on,
and
it
was
a
lot.
It
was
specifically
around
the
buffer,
constructor
blasts
or
two
years
ago,
and
that
was
a
thing
that
we
tried
to
offer
her
evangelism
that
didn't
end
up
playing
out,
but
yeah
yeah.
That's
definitely
helpful.
Yeah.
D
I
think
this
is
a
good
small
start
to
because
it's
right
now,
it's
it's
very
specifically
focused
or
scoped
to
this.
These
changes,
but
will
have
further
changes
with
you
know
we
can
kind
of
rip
out
a
summary
from
the
notes
that
we
already
have
from
the
prior
session,
so
I
think
we'll
be
able
to
get
it
down
into
like
a
very
digestible.
Smaller
document
manila
I'd
be
happy
to
work
with
you
on
that.
If
you'd
like.
A
J
G
A
Yeah
I
I
love
this
that's
great,
so
I
will
give
a
little
bit
of
context
Tracy
and
I
at
one
point
we're
working
on
the
getting
started
repo,
but
it's
been
relatively
inactive.
Recently
there
were
some
ideas
around
it
and
like
there's
a
few
consistent
things
across
the
organization
like
a
good
first
issue
label
that
said,
I
dis
could
totally
supersede
that,
like
that,
this
is
great
and
if
you
want
to
take
on
this
work,
you're
absolutely
welcome
to
yeah.
B
D
B
D
B
A
This
is
something
I'm
super
passionate
about
as
well
and
so
I'd
be
had
like.
If
you
have
any
questions
or
you
know
anything
specific,
you
want
to
know
or
like
any,
you
know,
you
want
to
get
started
somewhere.
You
want
to
kind
of
understand
certain
bits.
Please
please,
please
don't
hesitate
to
reach
out
to
me.
This
is
one
of
the
things
I
hear
about
the
most.
Would.
B
F
B
E
B
A
J
I
just
want
to
add,
because
this
really
aligns
with
the
mentorship
program,
because
we're
currently
trying
to
like
set
six-month
goals
that,
like
revolves
around
the
Montano,
the
ecosystem,
so
the
mentees
can
like
we
can
help
them
decide
choose
where
to
start
in
the
mentorship
program
and
help
start
helping
nodes
in
general,
like
in
the
different
working
groups.
So
I
don't
think
they
would
love
to
help
pushing
this
forward
as
well.
Yeah.
B
Because
I
kind
of
see
the
the
working
groups
and
the
strategic
initiatives
are
probably
the
best
place
to
find
sort
of
a
more
longer
term
contribution
path.
You
know
it's
I,
I
know:
we've
got
things
like
good,
first
issue
and
stuff
like
that,
but
if
we
can
kind
of
find
something
that
matches
the
person's
interest
like
performance
or
you
know
doctor
or
whatever
yeah
darker
exactly
that
I
think
that's
a
good
way
to
sort
of
leverage
what
people
already
know
while
they
get
involved
in
the
in
our
project,
which
is
what
we
really
want.
B
Right,
yeah
I
think
you
know
what
I'm
suggesting
is
we
we
just
help.
You
know
help
help
get
the
connection
to
the
working
group
so
that
you
know
he
feels
comfortable
to
attend
and
that
people
know
there's
somebody
who's
kind
of
willing
to
help
coordinate
some
of
this
because
III
I,
you
know,
even
even
like
you,
you
know,
was
just
mentioned.
It's
sometimes
hard
to
tag.
B
I
I
can
actually
do
that
even
crazy
community
function
is
been
given
to
me.
I
can
work
on
the
toasted
on
both
feet.
Like
currently
dimension
shifting,
we
are
still
looking
for
the
Navin,
our
collaborators
bone
from
each
of
the
working
groups,
sisters
with
the
mentorship
and
matching
process.
So
if
anybody
is
actually
interested
in
getting
the
hands-on
University
thinker
and
someone
constructed
that
now.
B
I
B
Yeah
and-
and
it's
probably
good
to
start
out
with
an
issue
that
says:
hey,
you
know
I'm,
you
know,
one
of
the
things
we
want
to
do
is
to
help.
You
know
these.
The
people
who
are
volunteering
to
find
issues
that
might
be
good.
You
know,
do
you
mind
if
I
go
through
the
issues
on
a
regular
basis
and
kind
of
tag
you
know
but
ping,
you
guys
to
think
which
ones
you
people,
which
ones
you
think
are
going
to
be
good,
first
issues
or
not,
and
hopefully
they.
I
G
Yeah
good
okay,
so
one
of
the
benefits
of
the
document
I
was
describing
is
that
it
doesn't
have
to
be
at
an
issue
level
per
se.
Oh
great
thing
like
this
is
an
area
that
this
working
group
needs
help
with
or
code
bees
bass
needs
attention
on,
so
that
then
perhaps
people
can
come
together
in
groups
and
work
on
that
whole
area
rather
than
having
to
tag
specific
issues,
etc.
Yeah.
D
That's
the
only
downside
to
that
AJ
is
the
it's
not
a
downside.
Sorry,
someone
has
to
maintain
that.
So
that's
one
of
the
reasons
why
getting
started
has
sort
of
like
it
ages
out
pretty
quickly
because
we,
but
that's
not
bad
thing.
If
someone,
if
you're
willing-
and
if
someone
you
know
if
people
get
into
you-
know
the
cadence
of
being
able
to
update
that
as
we
evolve
in
the
challenges
that
we
have.
D
That's
great,
we
just
don't
want
again
like
we
don't
want
stale
stuff
that,
like
you
know,
people
are
excited,
they
see
this
and
then
like
they
go
to
help
out.
It
turns
out.
That's
just
no
longer
a
thing
and
that's
why
I
think
we've
been
sort
of
like
lazy.
It's
not
lazy,
better
word
for
it,
but
sort
of
saying
like
check
out
these.