►
From YouTube: Community Committee Meeting
Description
A
Okay,
we're
life
thanks
everyone
for
coming
another
Hong,
Kong,
nodejs
committee
meeting
we
this
is.
This
is
four
days
today:
Thursday
October
17th
2019,
let's
per
request
of
a
mod,
we
are
going
to
bump
this
up
one
of
the
issues
specifically
to
prioritize
it
just
so
he
can
get
to
his
next
meeting,
specifically
its
issue
or
sorry
PR
5,
4
4,
which
is
move
moving,
empty
emeritus,
yeah
I,
guess.
Are
there
any
ones
or
anything
like
that?.
B
Yeah
I
can
give
some
context,
so
I've
been
inactive
and
kumkum
for
a
while
and
I
think
it's
the
right
move
to
like
move
my
status.
However,
I
want
to
be
like
to
continue
leading
the
mentorship
team.
So
I've
had
a
chat
with
tyranny.
About
like
how
we'd
go
about
that
after
I
moved
to
emeritus.
After
that,
so
I
guess
you
can
get
more
context
on
this
journey,
but
I
believe
since
I'm
gonna
be
leaving
the
compound.
We're
gonna
need
someone
to
provide
updates
or
if
we
need
anything
from
the
mentorship
team
side
to
have.
B
A
Cool
so
since
there's
nobody
immediately
accessible
I
liked
sorry.
D
To
interrupt,
could
you
clarify
what
it
will
take,
cuz
I'm,
not
sure
so.
A
We
have
been
getting
this
to
some
extent
through
one
of
the
folks
from
from
Tracy
Lee's
company
I'm
spacing
on
the
name
of
the
company
who
has
occasioning
yes,
this
stop.
Thank
you.
The
who's
occasionally
come
in
and
I
believe
has
been
helping
to
some
extent
with
it.
Additionally,
there
is
another
person
who
has
come
in
occasionally
and
I
spacing
on
me.
That
was.
E
E
We
we
don't
want
to
block
good
community
work,
there's
not
somebody
on
this
committee
that
can
attend
a
meeting
at
a
weekly
time.
Also
there's
no
as
long
as
there's
a
clean
escalation
path.
If
something
goes
goes
wrong
which
we
do
have
with
the
moderation
moderation
team.
There's
also,
no
reason
why
updates
necessarily
have
to
be
made
in
person
yep,
so
you
can
submit
submit
a
written
update
if
you're,
a
community
leader
who
can
attend
cop
comm
meetings
once
a
month
or
something
yeah,
I,
think
some
of
the
mutant
ideas.
F
C
C
B
C
Think
it
makes
sense
to
write
that
down
as
and
allow
like.
I
know
like
you
know,
Salah
is
working
on
something
as
well
and-
and
you
know,
if
we're
not
gonna,
be
able
to
find
a
calm,
calm
champion,
it's
something
that
would
enable
that,
to
you
know,
figure
out
how
that
should
be
moving
forward
without
that
as
well.
Yeah.
A
I've
also
I've
been
working
on
something
that
I've
been
waiting
to
submit
that
I
think
waiting
to
bring
the
issue
on
I
was
planning
on
it
for
this
meeting,
but
I
got
sick,
I've
been
getting
feedback
from
a
couple
people,
but
I
think
it
can
also
play
into
that.
I
will
try
to
get
that
off
either
or
or
Monday.
C
A
For
sure
and
I
I
think
that
also
creates
I
mean
I
think
we
still
need
to
address
a
little
bit
of
how
we
approach
right.
Remember,
shipping,
comp
but
I
think
that
creates
a
little
bit
cleaner
of
a
path
to
our
current
status
quo
with
that
and
it
getting
selected
from
you
know,
membership
of
initiatives
and
active
folks
and
initiatives
yeah.
A
B
A
A
A
Cool
in
that
case,
I
think
we
can
move
on
to
the
rest
of
the
agenda.
Thank
You
Ahmad,
for
bringing
and
and
having
us
bring
that
up
earlier.
So
you
could
be
your
friend
cool
so
with
that,
let's
get
on
to
the
normal
agenda,
see
here.
So
let's
do
initiative,
updates
any
updates
from
initiatives
that
focus
our
hearts
up.
C
B
For
mentorship
go
yeah,
so
we're
currently
preparing
for
the
next
cohort.
So
we've
learned
a
lot
during
the
last
Co
heard
about
how
to
go
about
matching
and
also
about
process
itself.
So
the
process
was
kind
of
unfair
because
everyone
can
apply
to
like
select
their
top
mentor
like
mentees
can
select
their
top
mentors,
and
this
is
alter
than
having
each
mentor
having
like
200
candidates
that
they
have
select
from,
which
is
unfair.
E
E
We
are
working
on
continuing
to
work
on
implementing
the
full
redesigned
mock
in
a
staging
branch
right
now
that
look
at
emerging
the
master
once
we
have
parity
and
it's
in
a
usable
state
we're
getting
real
close
and
this
Saturday
starting
at
around
9:00
a.m.
Pacific
time
going
until
when
work,
you
know
when
we
get
tired,
we're
gonna
have
another
hackathon.
E
Since
that's
worked
very
well
in
the
past,
we've
had
two
or
three
of
those
other
ones
where
we've
had
you
know
three
or
four
people
calling
in
to
come
and
just
kind
of
hang
out
on
a
on
a
video
chat
and
and
work
for
the
day.
So
we
will
be
online.
This
Saturday
continuing
the
hack
away.
Everybody
is
welcome
to
join
I,
would
point
you
to
the
issue
in
dev,
but
I
am
mobile
right
now
and
don't
have
a
readily
available,
but
it
is.
A
A
C
Okay,
so
I
I'll,
move
on
then
to
board
updates,
make
sense
yep
on
the
board
front.
The
the
next
meeting
is
the
I'll
probably
get
this
wrong,
but
last
week
Mike,
so
it's
it's
upcoming.
I!
Don't
have
any
issues
on
the
board
right
now.
So
if
there
are
any
issues
that
you
want
to
bring
up,
just
let
me
know
and
I
guess:
Joe
I'll
leave
it
leave
the
CPC
update
to
you
sure.
F
C
F
It's
great
along
those
lines.
We've
been
doing
a
lot
of
work
on
project
aggression
and
how
projects
apply
and
work
through
the
process
foundation.
It's
a
lot
of
work.
There
Michael
has
issued
a
pull
request
open,
treats
you
want
to
project
repo
that
addresses
a
lot
of
things
that
we've
been
finding
or
open
the
path
back
and
iterate
on
it.
F
Folks
with
we
thought
through
it,
and
perhaps
it's
the
folks
who
are
going
through
profits
as
well
I
wanted
to
call
out
to
that.
We
are
moving
the
CSD
proposal
to
stage
two
so
that
they're
given
Krista
folks
if
they
want
to
check
that
out
to
our
staging
process.
After
that
board,
we've
been
discussing
some
responsible
security
disclosure.
F
What
else
like
it's
like?
The
connection?
If
anybody's
interested
in
infrastructure
the
jQuery
holds
from
the
jQuery
infrastructure
group,
where
I'm
in
a
meeting
right
after
this
meeting
at
1:00
p.m.
Eastern
time
that
they're
gonna
try
to
start
working
through
some
of
their
issues,
which
I
think
will
help
drive
and
inform
some
issues
that
the
foundation,
if
you're
interested
in
that
I,
believe
the
issue
is
in
the
cross
project?
Council
repo,
three
four
five,
the.
F
F
A
A
A
F
F
G
A
A
A
Okay,
good
awesome,
perfect,
I,
I
know
that
I
end
up
parking
lot.
I
would
check
in
a
lot.
So
thank
you
all
to
those
who
take
minutes.
It's
super
super
helpful
for
everyone
cool.
So
we
took
care
of
the
moving
Ahmad
to
America's
issue.
I'm,
just
gonna
move
that
down
because
up
not
in
the
correct
place.
It's
it's
a
compound
issue
cool.
So
the
next
issue
is
collaborator
summit
or
the
first
issues
collaborator
summit
Montreal.
C
Having
touched
on
it
in
the
TSC
meeting
as
well,
I
think
it's
just
on
there
for
awareness,
Matteo,
I
think
I
checked
yeah.
He
added
it
a
few
days
ago
and
I
think
it's
basically
like.
Let's
make
sure
everybody
knows
that
it's
there
and
that
you
know
make
sure
you
include
it
in
your
travel
plans
for
just
plus
interactive,
which
we
hope
people
are
going
to
as
well.
H
C
I
did
have
one
other
question.
I
know
we
were
discussing
in
one
of
the
working
groups,
a
submission,
and
we
were
wondering,
like
you
know,
what
we're
trying
to
decide
was
between
collaborate
workshop
and
talk
mm-hmm,
and
it
was
kind
of
like
you
know.
We
didn't
we
we
didn't
want
to
choose
necessarily
just
collaborate
if
that
meant
that,
like
new
people
felt
that
it
was,
you
know,
just
collaboration
among
an
existing
working
group
versus
a
workshop.
That
you
know
might
be
more
like
we're.
C
H
Community
core
will
run
along
the
same
timeline,
is
the
chance
of
interactive
and
then
collapsin
will
be
afterwards.
So
if
you
want
to
do
one
that
is
more
so
we're
focusing
community
we're
more
towards
newer
people
and
doing,
which
is
why
one
to
the
workshop
style
that
is
more
conducive
to
them
joining
and
then
the
collaboration.
C
That
would
that
was
kind
of
where
I
you
know,
that's
where
I
was
coming
from,
because
I'd
heard
kind
of
some
of
those
those
discussions,
I
guess
like
in
our
in
the
context
of
the
package
maintenance
team.
It's
like
we
want
to
spend
some
time
on
the
workshop.
You
know
on
the
working
together.
Let's
move
things
forward,
but
also
some
time
on
the
evangelism
relation
man,
hey.
If
you
haven't
been
involved.
H
Most
of
Li
I'm
sorry
I
forgot
these
information
too.
We
talked
about
having
folks
list
out
on
the
CFP.
What
level
of
information
they
wanted
to
start
at
so
and
right
now
means
I'm,
sorry,
I'm
being
a
little
blunt,
and
by
no
means
does,
does
anybody
want
to
exclude
anybody
or
say
that
they're
going
to
exclude
anybody,
but
more
just
exactly
what
you're
saying
that,
like
okay
list
out
on
on
the
CFP
room,
start
at
X
level,
and
this
is
where
we're
gonna
start.
So
we
won't
be
bringing
people
up
to
see.
A
J
Cermak,
it
was
related
to
the
past
point.
Thank
you
for
calling
that
out
Eva.
This
is
a
new
addition
to
the
CFP
process.
The
template
now
includes
we're
trying
to
balance
out
what
people
want
and
I'm.
Sorry,
if
it's
really
loud
here,
there's
the
only
place
I
can
find
work
that
had
internet
you
could
the
shape
the
CFP
is
looking
for
people
the
session
facilitators
to
indicate
at
what
level
people
want
to
join.
J
So
people
can
explicitly
indicate
that
they're
gonna
start
with
less
or
more
context
for
anyone
on
my
joint,
and
this
is
to
balance
out
the
needs
that
people
have
sex
reports
like
some
sessions
have
given
feedback
saying
that
they
weren't
able
to
cover
out
as
much
as
they
wanted,
because
they
had
to
spend
a
lot
of
time
giving
context
to
new
people,
whereas
other
session
said
this
is
great.
We
definitely
need
new
people
were
totally
happy
visual
content
so
to
balance
that
out
we're
giving
people
that
points
I'm.
D
D
So
so
maybe
it's
about
putting
together
a
little
roadmap
like
a
key
that
people
can
use
to
relate
on
what
they
mean
by
each
level,
and
people
who
are
attending
could
refer
to
it
before
going.
They
might
even
have
a
little
brief
presentation
for
everyone
about
what
each
level
is
a
quick
slideshow
and
then
they
could,
even
you
know,
say:
oh.
D
That
means
I
want
to
attend
earlier
or
even
a
bit
later,
so
it's
just
a
little
Center
centerpiece
that
that
ties
the
abstractions
of
what
levels
mean,
because
there
are
too
many
different
perspectives
here
involved.
So
one
visual
can
tie
together.
I
can
help
with
the
visual,
but
you
know
the
preparation
and
all
of
that
I'm
kind
of
a
hands-off
this
year.
A
So
I
hate
the
challenge
with
that
is
that
a
lot
of
it
is
very
loose
and
undefined.
Many
folks
going
in
have
a
session
or
two
that
they're
participating
in
and
I've
been
in
sessions
where
it
gets
way
more
deep
into
nitty-gritty,
I
expected
it
to,
and
I've
also
had
sessions
where
I
expected
to
get
super
deep.
And
it's
not,
and
that's
kind
of
part
of
why
we
do
these
sessions.
A
J
It
might
be
helpful
to
explicitly
make
clear
to
everyone
who
is
going
to
the
collab
summit
that
they
are
welcome
to
invite
other
people
to
come.
I've
noticed
that
some
people
have
like
tell
other
people
come,
whereas
other
people
might
not
be
out
sure
and
I.
Think
to
the
point
Tierney
made
earlier,
that
there
are
some
people,
even
in
this
meeting,
who
went
to
the
collapse
of
it
because
they
were
explicitly
said.
They
were
welcome
to
that.
That's
something
that
we
would
like
to
encourage
so
to
give
people
the
permission.
J
H
We're
just
trying
to
strike
a
balance
between
making
sure
that
we
we
are
open
and
inclusive,
but
that
we
that
the
collaborators
don't
have
to
spend
all
of
their
time,
bringing
people
up
to
speed,
if
that's
not
what
they
wish
to
do,
that.
They
can
use
this
in
person
time
to
really
hash
things
out
and
move
forward.
C
H
G
C
A
Awesome
for
this
one
I'm
gonna
tie
box
it
here,
just
as
we
have
a
few
other
agenda
items,
and
this
is
the
first
continue
discussion,
I
more
than
welcome
to
I.
Don't
know
if
the
issue
in
the
via
Genda
is
the
right
place.
If
it's
not,
please
feel
free
to
create
an
issue
in
calm,
calm,
I
think
it's
that
I
think.
A
A
Hundred
percent
I'm
definitely
planning
on
one
that
I'd
like
to
have
as
many
people
that
as
possible
and
I
will
also
as
many
common
folks
at
and
I'd,
also
like
to
have
y'all
unable
to
join
remotely
if
you're
not
able
to
join
in
person.
Because
it's
you
know
related
the
thing.
I'm
gonna
be
sharing
any
place
that
I'd
like
to
bounce
feedback
on
in.
A
Cool
any
time
box,
so
no
go
into
questions
on
that
one.
The
next
item
is
required,
updates
to
come,
come
charter
again.
I
believe
this
is
this
just
needs
consensus
for
the
most
part,
we've
seemingly
hit
that
one
too
yeah.
We
have
no
objections,
it's
been
open
for,
but
like
a
month
just
over
a
month
now
there
are
comments
from
the
mud
which,
oh
and
from
dad,
which
I
will
go
ahead
and
address
soon
here,
but
yeah
I
think
so
these
are
really
good
points.
A
I
did
respond
to
the
ones
from
Joe
and
also
from
Ahmad.
It
looks
like
for
the
most
part.
So
if
y'all,
you
know,
if
I,
if
you
left
comments
on
it
and
if
you
could
check
to
see
if
I
responded
to
them
with
questions
or
additional
kind
of
context,
I'd
appreciate
that
just
so
you
can
get
with
this
kind
of
going
I
think
we're
pretty
close
on
it,
but
otherwise
you
know
I
think
we're
I
think
there's
not
a
ton
of
more
work
here
to
be
done.
A
C
C
A
A
A
I'm
just
typing
I
created
the
repo
I,
also
just
directly
committed
to
master
I,
believe
a
PR
or
yeah
a
you
know.
Read
me:
I
need
to
think
that
was
Rachel
still
too,
to
kind
of
push
step
forward
and
update
the
the
the
doc
that
we
had
going.
But
this
is
basic
need
to
launch.
I
will
see
if
I
can
fit
that
in
next
week.
I
don't
want
to
over
commit
on
that,
but
III
should
be
able
to
quickly
so.
C
A
A
A
A
K
A
A
D
So
you
know
there
are
different
things
that
affect
how
accessible
a
collaboration
medium
is,
and
this
is
really
the
hope
to
you
know
start
connecting
to
this
segment
of
of
the
community.
The
questions
are
actually
up
for
I.
Think
since
over
a
week,
maybe
you
know
Friday
the
week
before
I'm
gonna
face
the
doc
in
the
chat.
Just
so
people
would
be
able
to
see
or
I
could
share
my
screen.
If
that's
that's
preferable,
any
suggestions.
A
D
Yeah,
so
the
link
to
the
Google
Doc
has
been
on
the
issue,
so
so
you
know
I
try
to
keep
the
issue
clearly
bulleted
with
the
links
and
everything
on
top
secondary
to
all
the
comments,
and
basically
it's
two
of
us
who
really
put
in
material
and
we
have
like
22
different
perspectives.
That
we'd
rather
want
to
ask
in
the
annual
survey
we'd
rather
want
to
ask
you
know
two
different
styles:
one
is
very,
very
small.
D
You
know
like
out
of
the
way
kind
of
thing
like
and
the
other
one
is
a
little
bit
more
specific.
So
we
have
those
two
styles
and
you
know
we
kind
of
wanted
some
feedback
from
from
everyone
which
style
would
be.
You
know
more
appropriate
in
their
opinion
to
help
us
also
have
some.
You
know,
select
direction
and
just
stick
with
that.
D
We
do
cover
questions.
I've
talked
about
people
who
are
routinely
affected
by
you
know
certain
classes
of
you
know.
Challenges
are
related
to
audio-visual
physical
motor
attention,
cognitive
or
mental
health
related.
We
also
talk
about
whether
or
not
they
use
aids
for
those
and
they
would
pick
which
ones
that
relates
to.
We
do
a
quick
understanding
of
their
perspective
on
the
challenges
you
know
they
would
rate
how
much
smiling
they're
able
to
do.
When
we
talk
about
weather
accommodation
tools.
Are,
you
know,
efficient,
whether
they're
easy
to
use
to
set
up
and
info
forth.
D
We
then
move
to
try
to
understand
the
frame
of
reference
they
come
from
because
not
everyone
who's
doing
this
will
be
particularly
affected,
but
we
want
to
know
if
people
work
with
other
people
who
are
and
then
we
try
for
the
four
categories.
You
know
generalized
categories
to
try
to
picture
whether
or
not
it's
a
common
or
a
more
common
or
a
non-existent
thing
from
their
perspective.
D
And
then
we
just
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
open
source
community,
how
how
they
heal
accommodated,
and
then
we,
you
know,
ask
about
nodejs
in
particular,
and
here
the
idea
is
we
want
to
understand
if
people
seem
to
have
different
views
on
how
accommodated
they
feel-
and
you
know
it's
really
meant
to
just
year
the
initiative
with
the
emphasis
it
needs.
It
needs
to
focus
on
tools
that
are
not.
D
So
so
those
are
the
details,
lessons
the
three
positions:
I
mean
they're
they're,
covering
similar
basis,
but
they
are
just
short,
and
you
know
everybody's
welcome,
to
leave
comments
or
to
copy
the
V
Meath
suggestion
format
we're
using-
and
you
know,
just
suggest
the
way
under
a
headline
with
your
get
up
handle.
There
is
some
point
that
I
would
like
to
bring
out
the
group
that
we
we
actually
have
no
clue
like
both
of
us
me
and
solve
of
how
to
go
ahead
and
approach.
D
C
I
K
We
we
have
to
get
it
translated
and
then
once
it's
translated,
it
can
go
live,
and
so
we
can
be
a
little
bit
flexible
on
timing.
I
know
that
we're
sort
of
nearing
the
end
of
the
year
so
there
hasn't
been
an
actual
there's,
not
an
actual
go
live
date.
Just
yet
it
just
kind
of
depends
on.
You
know
how
long
it
takes
to
get
translated.
C
K
If
we
might
I
I
mean
it'll,
definitely
will
definitely
kind
of
want
to
take
a
look
at
the
entire,
the
entire
survey
and
just
see
where,
where
they
do
fit,
so
it
doesn't
feel
it
just
flows.
Well,
and
so
you
know,
let
me
spend
a
little
bit
of
time
taking
a
look
at
what's
proposed
and
it
does
it
does
it
make
sense.
K
Either
right,
let
me
I
can
take
a
look
at
the
proposed
questions
and
kind
of
provide
some
feedback.
Is
that
helpful
and
then
also
we
do
have
a
survey
survey
expert,
who
kind
of
helped
me
in
writing
the
questions
and
framing
the
questions,
but
to
see
they're
all
new
questions.
You
know
there
aren't
going
to
be
any
like
trending
issues
or
anything
like
that.
It
would
just
be
you
know,
really
the
consideration
is.
How
long
can
we
really?
We
really
want
the
survey
to
be,
and
so
just
choosing
the
questions
that
are.
K
Cuz,
we
sort
of
split
some
things
out
and
you
know,
as
things
evolve,
will
obviously
evolve
the
survey,
so
you
know
kind
of
hard
to
say
whether
it'll
you
know
if
folks
won't
respond,
because
it
so
long
or
you
know,
maybe
adding
these
new
things
will
add
more
interest.
We
kind
of
have
to
wait
and
see.
What
really
looks
actually
did
when
is
it
well?
K
I
mean
we're
waiting
on
translation
and
then
it
can
go
and
then
essentially
have
to
go
through
another
check
with
our
survey
to
ensure
that
things
look
good
and
then
it
can
go
so
you
know
it
could
it
could
go
within
a
month,
but
again,
we've
got.
We've
got
a
little
bit
of
time.
We
do
have
time
to
kind
of
figure
it
out.
If
that's,
what
we
want
to
do,
I
was.
K
C
I
guess
just
too
close
to
two
things.
So
your
your
comment
on
the
suggestion
in
terms
of
like
what
what
questions?
Maybe
if
you
look
at
them
and
say
these
are
the
questions
that
you
think
we
could
fit
in
as
a
proposal.
That
would
be
a
good
next
step,
yeah,
I
guess.
The
other
thing
I
just
wanted
to
say,
ask
the
rest
of
this.
The
calm
calm,
you
know:
are
there
any?
You
know
ignoring
specific
questions?
Are
there
any
concerns
or
objections
to,
including
you
know,
these
kinds
of
questions
in
the
survey
I
have.
K
So
I
mean,
as
far
as
criteria
for
removing
or
adding
I,
don't
think,
there's
anything
stated.
Hard-And-Fast
I
think
it's
based
on
community
feedback,
so
over
in
I
think
it
gets
to
admin
repo,
there's
just
a
there's
a
bit
there's
an
issue
in
there
where
folks,
just
kind
of
you
know,
provide
some
feedback
up.
You
know,
as
far
as
like
what
what
makes
sense,
what
doesn't
make
sense
and
that
kind
of
stuff.
So
not
necessarily
anything.
You
know
any
specific
criteria.
K
H
I
just
jump
in
for
two
seconds:
yep
good
I
just
wanted
to
tell
everybody
that
we
had
a
super
successful.
Ask
me
anything
on
Thursday
morning.
My
time
at
least
we
talked
about
HTTP
and
streams,
and
we
had
Anatoly
and
Stephen
on
it,
and
we
got
some
really
good
questions
and
they
didn't
get
had
some
good
conversation
and
I
just
want
to
give
a
shout
out
to
Rachel
for
helping
me
with
that.
I
think
it
was
a
really
good
first
place
dessert
and
I'm
excited
for
a
second
one.
So
just.
K
A
Hear
that
well,
if
you
hold
on
I,
have
to
pop
sorry
when
those
are
going
live.
If
you
want
to
send
I,
don't
know
I,
guess
I,
don't
want
to
I,
don't
feel
like
I'm
at
BAM.
But
you
know
if
you
want
to
send
reach
out
to
folks
in
Hong.
Kong
I'd
be
more
than
happy
to
help
kind
of
cure
and
promote
those
just
cuz.
It's
something
that
I
so
yeah.