►
From YouTube: Community Committee Meeting
Description
A
He
lies
hello,
YouTube,
a
cackle,
we're
gonna
get
started
with
today's
meeting.
So
thank
you
to
everyone
for
coming.
This
is
the
October
3rd
spooky
edition
of
the
noches
community
committee
meeting.
So
we're
gonna
kick
things
off
the
agenda
for
today
is
issue
537,
and
then
we
also
have
minutes
in
minutes.
In.
A
A
Sorry,
cool
I,
realized,
I,
couldn't
hear
anyone
so
y'all
get
on
your
update
and
everyone.
B
A
C
Cpc
stuff
well
exciting
news
today
that
it
was
announced
that
n
BM
is
the
first
project
that
is
joining
the
foundation
yay.
So
that's
really
exciting
news.
You
know
one
of
the
things
that
we've
been
really
focused
on
with
the
cross
pointer
council
is
the
you
know
on
boarding
pass
and
you
know
I
think
for
NB
m.
It's
been
fairly
smooth
and
I
think
that's
been
a
good
experience
and
yeah.
It's
it's
exciting!
I!
Think
it's
an
evolved
project
to
community.
So
it's
a
great
first
project
to
move
things
along
and
someday
to
celebrate.
A
D
D
A
Okay.
So
we
were
received
an
empty
report
to
report
at
notice
from
a
Russian
email
address
at
the
Russian
email
signature.
There
was
a
message:
we
responded
to
a
message
about
issue,
an
issue
in
the
node
core
repo
I
can
share
the
direct
issue.
Pumkin
members,
we
received
an
empty
email
to
report,
an
odious
benjamin
and
forests
responded
to
a
thread
regarding
moderation
in
the
moderation,
repo
I
think
I
recorded
those
ones
already,
but
that's
okay,
there's
only
three.
A
A
We
received
the
violate
the
CLC
violation
report
for
the
open
Jo
summit,
so
these
are
from
May
30.
If
those
three
and
though
I
believe
those
have
all
been
solved
in
the
moderation
area,
at
this
point,
we
block
to
a
user
for
posting
span.
That's
moderation
issue
279,
we
locked
to
spam
issue
from
a
vamp
user
so
that
if
she
was
still
open
despite
them
having
been
already,
there
was
still
additional.
Next,
we
blocked
the
user
for
posting
spam
and
off-topic
comments.
A
A
That's
moderation,
issue
283,
closed,
locked
and
blanked
out
one
of
the
issues
in
the
key
of
C
repo
for
being
spam,
and
the
posting
user
was
blocked
by
ATSC
member
issue,
287
for
moderation,
details
in
the
moderation
repo
deleted,
a
chilling
comment
about
the
user
in
which
is
logged
in
moderation,
issue
280
we've
got
a
random
like
he
must
report
at
no
GS
and
we
received
another
spaniel
tornado
guess.
I
will
say
that
we
very
consistently
get
spam
emails.
A
So,
that's
if
that's
something
that
we
want
to
report,
we
totally
can
and
we
can
keep
doing
that.
It
also
is
a
non-trivial
number
of
things.
So,
if
that's
something
that
there's
strong
feelings
about
one
way
or
the
other,
it's
useful
information
to
have
or
not
we
can
I
would
suggest
having
a
discussion
and
being
rethought
about
that.
Any
questions
I'll.
D
Add
that
around
the
recertification
there
was
an
issue
OpenID
CSU
repo
asked.
You
know
pointing
out
that
there's
no
more
TSC
members
who
were
part
of
the
moderation
team,
but
in
the
end
the
the
TSE
wasn't
concerned
with
that.
You
know
basically
expressed
confidence
and
comfort
that
the
moderation
team
was
handling
everything
appropriately.
So
I
think
that
was
a
good
thing.
A
So
we
are
down
to
five
people
in
the
moderation
team
and
including
so
basically,
the
mother-she
team
has
gone
through
the
correct
process,
or
at
least
in
slack
and
I
want
to
make
sure
it's
also
in
the
actual
noticed
or
team
in
the
org.
But
those
people
have
been
removed
from
this
plaque
in
addition
to
yep,
in
addition
to
having
been
removed
from
the
moderation
team,
so
yeah
we
can,
you
know
I,
believe
all
the
steps
up
and
followed
there.
So
I
also
wanted
to
give
that
update.
A
A
A
If
we
get
down
to
four
but
I
would
say,
five
is
the
minimum
for
that
and
then
going
up
to
I
mean
ten
could
work
but
I
think
it's
like
it
makes
it
kind
of
I
think
it
builds
in
a
sense
of
know
if
someone
else
will
handle
that,
rather
than
those
people
being
kind
of
a
little
bit
more
dedicated
to
that
so
yeah
I
think
like
five
to
ten,
at
least
for
the
current
state
of
things.
You
know
that
might
change,
but
I
think
that's
where
we
are
right
now
and
I
take
brookline.
F
Okay,
we're
getting
city
coffee,
but
we
do
have
updates
on
a
like
bootstrapping
of
the
initiative.
It's
not
yet
finished
so
I
should
I
go
ahead
now:
yep,
okay,
so
yeah
I'm,
gonna,
actually
copy
and
paste
I
had
so
many
bullet
points.
So
it's
in
notes
already.
So
so,
basically,
we
didn't
manage
to
have
enough
time
like
it
was
main
solo
and
Fabio
I
believe
most
of
the
time
and
Abraham
joined
also
of
it.
We
didn't
get
a
a
very
formal
meeting
time
yet,
but
it
seems
an
11
a.m.
F
They
kind
of
also
feel
that
there's
a
void,
but
it's
not
as
tangible
and
and
there's
and
like
a
missing
component
of
of
knowing
what
that
is
knowing
what
the
priorities
would
look
like.
You
know
so
so
we
looked
very
very
briefly
at
a
at
a
survey
that
was
done
by
like
the
Stack
Overflow
insights.
F
Basically-
and
you
know,
I
can
share
the
screen
and
talk
about
this
later
on
if
we
have
time,
but
it
basically
shows
that
you
know
the
amount
of
information
we
know
is
really
percentage-wise
how
many
people
belong
to,
which
group
of
you
know.
You
know
they
put
it
as
disability
status.
I
would
say
you
know
different
status
or
unconventional
status,
so
so
I
think
for
an
initiative
to
actually
help
those.
F
It
is
meant
to
help
equally-
and
you
know
not
necessarily
disability
or
you
can
talk
about
language
barrier
being
one
for
this
kind
of
thing
to
actually
be
representative
of
the
goals
that
would
make
the
impact
needed
I
think
we
have
to
actually
do
a
survey
that
is
targeted
towards
understanding
what
these
challenges
look
like
how
these
challenges
present,
like
a
person,
can
have
more
than
one
challenge
together
and
and
the
rate
of
how
they
get
in
the
way
for
those
who
actually
don't
necessarily
have
the
label
associated
with
it.
F
You
know
by
a
professional
reliable.
So
so
we
all,
we
all,
are
affected
by
attention
deficit
or
overload,
and
you
know
some
people
are
also
affected
by
not
being
typical
in
their
communication,
so
how
their
overload
makes
their
message
harder
to
hear
as
a
compounded
effect
of
these
things,
and
you
know
so
so.
Phase
zero
would
be
a
survey
and
we
would
be
kidding
ourselves
if
we
can
say
the
initiative
should
look
like
this
and
then,
let's
start
doing
the
survey
that
that
doesn't
really
come
out.
F
At
least
that
was
my
opinion,
but
it's,
it's
really
I
believe
a
shared
conclusion
that
we
came
to
in
our
discussions,
the
two
more
things
about
structure
so
other
than
the
slob
being
on
Fridays
11:00
Eastern.
F
We
are
hoping
and
I
believe
Abraham
joined
potentially
for
that
role,
but
we
are
hoping
to
have
a
back
end
of
a
champion
because
we're
really
stumbling
at
this,
and
also
maybe
we
can
contrast
whether
we
should
go
with
a
project
board
or
start
a
Rico
that
you
know
where
you
can
have
its
own
project
board.
They're.
All
these.
These
things
we
can
discuss
later.
B
I
would
like
to
are
there
some
things
to
select
speaks
the
the
point
is
to.
We
have
so
many
little
little
data
about
this.
This
that
everything,
for
example,
were
selected
on
the
survey
from
the
Stack
Overflow,
and
there
is
a
data
there.
That's
thirty
percent,
at
least
of
the
people
that
respond,
that
applied
under
survey
has
some
kind
of
mental
stability
issue,
for
example,
but
the
problem
is
that
this
survey
does
not
consist.
Data
does
not
has,
for
example,
the
impact
on
life,
the
struggle,
the
the
challenge
that
the
people
face
itself.
B
So
it
will
be
nice
to
have
the
more
useful
and
reliable
data.
So
we
can
comprehend
the
extensive
of
this
information,
and
why
is
that?
The
point
is,
we
are
faced
with
different
people
or
everyone
and
to
have
a
community
that
should
be
how
can
I
say,
inclusive,
and
we
need
to
understand
not
only
about
the
aspect
of
the
mind
by
the
aspect
of
the
communication
skills
itself,
how
to
relate
it
to
each
other
and
others
other
stuff,
and
there
is
some
kind
of
day.
B
B
We
have,
for
example,
have
a
burden
to
language
translation,
but
so
me
we
don't
have
it's
not
many
sites
that
have,
how
can
I
say
boroughs
burns
on
the
on
the
contracts
on
the
contrast
to
people
have
there
has
some
kind
of
difficult
to
to
see
some
kind
of
color,
for
example
people
that
kids?
You
cannot
see
red
as
an
example,
so
this
is
a
real-life
impact
on
the
people
that
some,
if
they
are
on
our
website,
that
there
some
information
on
red
they
will
not,
it
will
be
invisible
to
them.
B
This
is
a
real
example,
and
this
is
we
don't
have
yet
our
our
we
are
trying
to
do
this
from
the
on
a
solid
ground
using
using
a
could
you
help
a
missile
I
did
remember
it's
a
that's.
Your
suggested
stack
over
fun.
No!
No!
It's
not
sorry
for
the
method
that
we
are
used
to
that
that
he
knew
suggested
that
we
use
the
scientific
method.
Remember
so
we
can.
We.
B
F
Yeah,
sorry
about
that
yeah!
Well,
yeah.
We
talked
about
the
importance
of
feedback.
The
importance
of
you
know
we
can
propose
ideas,
but
we
should
always
be
careful
to
have
a
good
mechanism
to
get
the
right
feedback.
We
need
to
correct
how
our
ideas
are
actually
manifesting.
So
so
you
know
when
we
propose
a
method
to
improve.
F
B
B
A
I
would
document
what
you're
proposing
the
initiative
B
and
then
estimate
how
much
like
just
put
in
a
you
know,
one-line
estimate
of
how
much
time
it
might
take
like
you
know
in
an
hour
a
week
or
two
hours
a
week
or
something
just
so.
We
can
have
context
on
that
and
help
find
a
champion
that
can
help
you
be
effective,
and
you
know
if
we
don't
get
a
champion
for
that.
I
think
that's
less
of
a
reflection
on
you
and
more
of
a
reflection
on
our
current
process
and
how
we
do
things.
A
So
if
that
doesn't,
if
you
know
someone
doesn't
immediately
pop
up,
don't
fret
it's
not
something
wrong
with
how
you're
doing
things
there.
You
know
you're
not
misaligning
the
problem,
but
I
do
think
that
maybe
that's
that
that
might
end
up
being
the
case,
so
you
know
well,
we
can
move
on
from
there.
If
that,
doesn't
the
pathway
continue.
E
Can
I
since
I
recently
spun
down
user
feedback
and
we
transition
sort
of
organic
surveys
to
the
the
cross
product,
Council
Mississippi,
but
I'm
just
wondering
if
you
know
there
isn't
an
initial
sort
of
discovery
phase
here
where
we
just
need
to
learn
more
about
the
problem
and
wondering
if
that's
something
that
we
could
add
or
propose.
You
know
a
few
questions
that
go
into
the
broader
survey
to
get
that
broad
reach
across
the
organization's.
You
know
III
can
speak.
E
You
know
on
behalf
of
PayPal
that
you
know
that
sort
of
insight
and
the
positive
impact
that
an
initiative
like
this
would
have
on
the
community
in
the
word
us
that
could
bring
would
be.
You
know
something
that
that
we
leave
to
be
supportive
of,
and
and
you
know
we
have,
we
have
a
lot
of
internal
initiatives
that
that
they
online
with
that
and
so
you're
gaining
insight
on.
E
A
A
B
Guess
I
could
have
an
answer
for
that.
The
point
is
that
we
really
don't
know
the
point
of
the
surveys
we
at
this
point.
You
don't
know
if
we
what
we
need.
If
he's
a
bad
example,
we
don't
know
if
it
is
valid
or
not
yeah
and
do
it
in
a
way.
You
don't
know
if
you
need
an
ish
ative
or
we
can
feel
this.
This
void
in
our
already
initiative.
That's
I
believe
that's
the
point.
Yeah.
A
A
The
survey
results
at
open
door.
Sorry
that
was
just
interactive
every
year
as
far
as
I
know,
and
then,
whether
it'll
be
a
few
it'll,
be
a
few
months
before
the
next
survey
goes
out.
But,
given
that
this
is
a
specific
direction
that
the
our
group
is
asking
for,
I
think
we
could
hopefully
work
with
the
foundation
to
get
the
data
that
you're
looking
for
and
that
there's
some
your
questions
a
little
bit
before
for
our
own
internal
use,
not
to
like
a
couple
of
publicise
yet
before
the
time
that
we
would.
D
D
F
F
F
A
Yes,
the
one,
the
one
thing
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that's
clear
is
the
next
iteration
of
that
survey
will
probably
be
going
out
in
like
five
months
and
so
that,
like
I,
just
I
want
to
make
sure
that
it's
not
it's
clear
that
that
survey
won't
be
coming
out
like
it
won't
be
we're
getting
the
data,
be
getting
the
data
immediately.
It's
gonna
be
like
a
while
before
that
actually
goes
out,
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
that's
totally
quick,
but
otherwise.
Yes,
absolutely
it
might
also
just
I
mean.
F
Put
it
out
it's
more
than
that,
actually
is
sorry
I'm
like
by
feeler.
It's
not
like.
Are
you
interested
in,
but
rather
answer
a
few
questions
that
tell
us
a
little
bit
about
the
challenges
you
may
or
may
not
have,
and
by
having
that
part
note
that
he
might
be
holding
additional
surveys
either
in
five
months
or
at
a
different
timeframe
on
specific
to
that,
and
we
can
learn
more.
B
Just
I
believe
they
it's
both
correct,
but
it's
just
two
on
the
midterm.
We
just
have
to
have
a
first
low
level
questions
just
to
feel
the
moods
of
the
the
crowd
that
sort
of
speaking
and
if
you
have
how
can
I
say
a
good
response
from
that
we
in
the
survey,
we
will
do
a
fully
compressive
data
collection
about
the
this
initiative,
so
I
believe
that
to
be
and
I
don't
know
if
it's
that
this
moments
to
discuss
how
to
do
everything.
Oh.
A
Yeah
I
think
we
should
probably
try
to
document
this
a
little
bit
more
just
because
it
does
seem
like
there's
some
like
site
miscommunications
in
this
alignments
of
understanding.
What
this
like
to
run.
This
so
I
think
documenting
just
a
little
bit
more
and
documenting
expectations
of
those
working
toward
the
initiative
and
those
who
are
in
calm
calm
would
be
helpful
in
achieving
that.
A
I
think
there's
space
for
both
or
well
for
the
entire
kind
of
corpus
of
what's
been
discussed
so
far
and
I
think
just
having
everyone
getting
everyone
on
the
same
page
will
be
the
most
helpful
thing
we
can
do.
I
do
want
to
timebox
this
just
because
we're
35
minutes
in
and
we've
not
gotten
to
the
agenda
items
but
I
do
definitely
want
to
thank
y'all
for
the
work
on
this
and
moving
this
forward
and
keep
keeping
it
going
cool.
A
Yes,
opening
two
separate
issues:
cool,
okay,
let's
get
into
the
agenda,
so
the
agenda
first
agenda
item
required
updates
to
come
from
charger
to
reflect
the
Padilla's
foundation.
This
is
a
PRI
opened.
This
is
basically
a
relatively
large
change
to
our
charter.
It
removes
significant
amounts
of
context
and
certain
things
like
our
theoretical,
but
not
real
at
this
point
board
seat,
among
other
things,
so
yeah
also
individual
membership.
Thank
you
to
all
those
who
have
reviewed
it.
Dan
Joe
here
a
mod
will
lead
a
Giri
Michael.
Thank
you
for
reviewing
it.
A
A
D
A
D
It's
usually
the
I
think
third
Friday
of
every
month,
so
it
was
last
deck,
so
it
will
be
a
few
weeks
away.
I
think
the
like
the
CPC
needs
to
take
a
look
at
these
and
then
once
the
CPC
you
know,
looks
at
and
says
they're
comfortable
I
think
they
would
then
just
like
we
discussed
before,
because
it
used
to
be
chartered
by
the
board
would
probably.
D
A
So
in
that
case,
once
I
get,
those
changes
in
I
will
say
on
Friday,
so
tomorrow,
I
will
get
the
changes
in
and
then
create
an
issue
in
the
CCC
repo.
A
requesting
reviewed,
CPC
review
of
it
and
I
will
comment
in
that
they
are
saying.
I
requested
CPC
review.
Now
that
changes
have
been
addressed
or
requested.
A
Changes
have
been
addressed
that
there's,
because
there's
a
lack
of
lack
of
objection
that
we
could
begin
to
proceed
so
with
that
I
will
try
to
get
that
done
tomorrow
and
theoretically,
that
I
would
assume
72-hour
decided
I
doubt
it
will
be
fully
reviewed
by
Monday,
but
I.
Imagine
the
week
after
this
Monday
is
the
CPC
the
week
after
who
actually
excited
more
news
to
mom
okay,
so
maybe
it
might
be
done
next
week,
but
the
week
after
it
should
by
then
hopefully
have
been
reviewed
successfully
and
a
approved.
So
cool,
though
he's
through
that.
A
A
Cool
no
social
media
community
collaboration
issue
for
for
for
so
I,
went
through
and
created
the
repo,
as
we've
discussed,
I
believe
it's
linked
from
the
pom-pom
read
me
now:
I
changed
the
names
to
actually
match
that
IP
yard
yeah,
no
Jo
social
media
delegates.
There
is
a
brief
read
me
in
that
so
went
through
and
follow
through
on
that.
I
need
to
follow
up
with
ritual
to
proceed,
but
once
we
talk
I
think
we
should
be
ready
to
go.
A
A
A
So
I
should
be
good
there.
Any
questions,
thoughts,
comments
on
that
one
cool
and
then
this
last
agenda
item
is
the
request
from
a
giri
from
the
disk
collection
next
steps.
He
has
an
open,
PR
I
told
him
I'd
review
that
I
did
not
get
around
to
that.
I
will
do
that
today,
but
we
were
relatively
good
to
go.
This
is
for
reference
to
PR.
Is
there
dis
collection
here?
37
so
should
be
good
to
go
soon.
Ish
on
that
I
will
definitely
review
today.