►
From YouTube: Node.js Community Committee Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
And
now
we're
live
cool
thanks
for
that
that
poke
joe
cool.
So
do
we
want
to
get
started
with
any
announcements.
B
I
don't
know
if
it's
been
mentioned
yet,
but
openjs
foundation
announced
the
javascript
landia
program,
the
individual
supporter
program
and
kind
of
the
things
that
go
around
that
so
that's
kind
of
cool.
C
B
Kind
of
see,
if
I
can
find
a
link
or
anything
openjsf.org
dot,
javascript
landia-
I
will
add
it
to
the
minutes.
Such.
A
Yeah
I
ended
up
signing
up
over
the
weekend.
Yeah.
That's
cool.
Definitely
check
that
I'm
interested
to
see
how
that
progresses
worth.
D
Mentioning
is
the
election
for
the
primary
cpc
director
is
opening
now
that's
open
to
to
cpc
members
and
is
voted
on
by
cpc
voting
members.
But
if
you
know
it's
worth
mentioning
that
people
have
opinion
input
to,
let
the
cpc-
I
guess
that's
you
joe
right,
the
representative.
No
so
you
can
have
have
some
influence
on
that.
A
Mary
is
it
you,
okay,
mary
yeah,
okay,
cool
yeah.
So
definitely
if,
if
folks
have
opinions
or
thoughts,
let's
be
well
represented.
D
A
Cool
I'll
take
that
as
a
no
by
the
way.
Whoever
is
writing
minutes.
Thank
you.
Do
we
have
an
initiative
updates.
A
I
guess
I
can
go
with
examples
so,
over
the
past,
like
month
and
a
half
it's
been
lighter
over
the
holiday,
but
over
the
last
month
and
a
half
the
mentorship
program
set
examples
up
with
a
mentee
who
I've
worked
with
on
on
doing
a
handful
of
things,
I
I
set
out
to
kind
of
try
to
help
get
them
coverage
in
all
of
the
different
like
doing
kind
of
one
of
the
things
that
you
know.
A
We
we
do
in
node
so
like
doing
one
of
each
of
the
things
so,
like
you
know
doing
their
own
pr.
Reviewing
someone
else's
fixing
a
bug,
adding
a
new
thing.
Something
like
you
know
that
whole
set
of
things
went
pretty
well,
it
has
gone
pretty
well.
We
have,
I
think,
two
new
two
new
examples
from
them
review
on
some
others,
which
I
think
ended
up
getting
merged.
A
I
may
be
off
on
that,
but
yeah
it
seems
to
have
gone
pretty
well
and
they've
they've
done
a
fantastic
job.
So
that's
I.
I
have
a
feeling
we're
coming
close
to
wrapping
up.
I
need
to
actually
look
at
the
dates
on
that,
but
yeah.
It's
that's
gone
fantastically.
A
Additionally,
there
was
just
some
more
work
on
reviewing.
It
turns
out
the
pr's
in
this
one
get
very
large
very
quickly,
so
you
know
I
I
do
my
best
to
go
through
and
review
like
them,
re-review
them
all
once
a
month
or
so
just
because
it
ends
up
being
a
lot
of
work.
So
if
people
are
interested
in
helping
with
that,
that'd
be
super
helpful,
but
also
generally
just
trying
to
go
through
and
consistently
do
that,
at
least
since
our
last
update
on
examples.
A
Any
updates
from
other
initiatives-
I
I
see
we
have
david
and
we
have
divvy.
B
Yeah,
I
think
we
were
hoping
to
maybe
do
a
website
redesign
review
today.
So
we
could
there's
an
issue
open
for
that
that
we
could,
if
nobody
objects,
we
could
take
a
look
at
what
the
status
is
there
and
kind
of
go
through
any
blockers,
and
things
like
that,
if
we
want
to
wait
for
to
get
on
the
agenda
sometimes
well,.
A
I'd
say
it's
maybe
on
the
review
part:
let's,
let's
wait,
but
if
there's,
if
you
have
updates
like
I,
I
know,
that's
like
a
very
nitpicky
difference,
but
if
there's
anything
like
updated
or
to
update
your
share,
definitely
feel
free.
E
So
what
I
can
say
is
that
the
past
two
months
in
november
and
december
we're
a
bit
slow
just
because
holidays,
but
we
have
seen
like
a
few
older.
You
know
members
return
to
the
meetings
you
know
and
who
want
to
help
out
and
work.
So
we
have
pointed
them
in
the
right
direction
and
yeah.
That's
about
it
like
we
haven't.
I
haven't
seen
much.
E
You
know
contribution
from
them,
but
I
know
they
have
been
attending
the
meetings
and
you
know
there
have
been
some
talks
in
slack
where
they're
like,
where
they
want
to
help
out
so
they're
and
they're,
just
trying
to
see
like
everything
you
know
where
everything
is
because
they
were
absent
for
so
long
so
but
yeah.
F
Go
ahead
alex,
so
we
have
an
update
for
the
mentorship
initiative.
We
currently
have
a
document
started
to
get
a
new
mentee
on
for
the
napi
working
group,
which
is
going
to
be
great.
We
added
michael
you
you're
on
it.
You
had
some
and
we
also
had
some
more
notes
with
the
working
group
themselves,
so
we
will
be
working
on
that
and
moving
closer
towards
getting
nfpi
new
mentee.
F
D
A
Very
much
one
one
tiny
question
I
have
for
for
david
and
alex:
do
you
do
you
plan
on
like
re
like
so
like?
We
did
a
bunch
of
work
for
examples
to
like
get
a
kind
of
a
proposal
out
there,
and
then
we
did
a
bunch
of
work.
Yeah
you're
doing
a
bunch
of
work
for
an
api.
If
those
projects
want
to
like
have
another
mentee,
do
we
do?
We
have
a
path
of
hey?
G
D
An
example
would
be.
G
Just
the
like
the
outreach,
just
in
terms
of
who
you
know
who
would
respond
as
far
as
the
like
you
know,
reaching
out
to
a
runner-up
or
something
like
that
that
that
also
is
is
an
option,
but,
of
course,
is
is
going
to
be
gated
by
whether
or
not
those
people
are
still
interested
and
right
and
things
like
that,
but
yeah.
That
said,
if
you,
if
you
do
want
another
mentee,
for
example,
is
that
something
we
could
probably
just
run
through
again
much
more
quickly.
This
time.
A
Got
you
I,
I
guess
one
question
to
that,
and
this
is
more
of
a
general
question
not
tied
to
any
specific
one.
Is
there
a
way
the
social
team,
a
hundred
of
what
percent
of
which
is
present
right
now,
could
could
be
helpful
in
that.
G
Yeah
I
mean,
I
think,
the
the
visibility
on
the
open
positions
is
is
one
of
the
most
important
pieces,
because
you
know
that's
kind
of
the
top
of
the
funnel
and
the
larger.
That
is
the
the
better
for
the
process.
So
I
guess
the
question
would
be.
Is
there?
Is
there
anything
that
mentorship
should
do
from
the
perspective
of
social
just
to
make
sure
that
when
we
do
have
one
of
these
positions
open
it
does
we
give
you
what
you
need
to
to
make
sure
that
there's
a
wider
reach.
A
I
I
I
think,
and
joe
definitely
feel,
free
to
amend
this
or
correct
it.
I
I
think
that
reaching
out
to
just
joe
and
I
or
either
either
directly
or
creating
a
pr
in
the
tweet
repo
or
creating
like
writing
something
up
in
the
node.js
social
channel
in
the
opengs
slack.
A
A
Do
we
want
to
do
you
want
to
try
doing
that
with
the
an
api
one.
G
Yeah
yeah,
we
will
definitely
definitely
do
that.
Yeah,
perfect.
A
Cool,
michael
and
joe,
do
you
have
any
updates
from
the
foundation
that
you
want
to
share.
B
Well,
like
michael
mentioned,
the
elections
coming
up
soon,
it's
the
primary
board
seat,
director
from
the
cpc,
the
open,
js
foundation,
cross
project
council.
The
folks
who
are
eligible
are
current
cpc
members
and
the
people
who
will
be
voting
will
be
voting
members
of
the
cpc,
but
you
know
if
anybody
has
any
questions,
please
reach
out.
B
What
else
has
been
going
on?
I
mean.
One
thing
I
think
is
interesting
is
there's
an
issue
open
around
a
diversity
and
inclusion.
You
know,
which
is
always
important
and
also
always
kind
of.
I
don't
know
if
the
challenge
is
the
right
word,
but
you
know
something
that
we
want
to
work
on,
so
we're
gonna
start
using
some
time
to
work
on
that,
and
I
think
the
you
know.
B
First
thoughts
are
figuring
out
getting
data
for
one
and
also
figuring
out
ways
that
we
can
support
our
projects
in
their
efforts
to
improve
diversity
and
inclusion
in
their
projects
and
their
project,
leadership
and
so
on.
So
that's
really
interesting.
D
Yeah
bringing
that
back
to
the
the
node
project,
one
of
the
discussion
was
like
to
look
at
what
existing
projects
have
in
terms
of
governance,
or
you
know,
goals
or
anything
like
that,
and-
and
I
think,
while
we
have
lots
of
stuff,
which
is
you
know,
supportive
and
encouraging
of
of
work
on
that
front,
I
couldn't
think
of
anything
where
we've
written
down
goals
or-
and
I
just
thought
tyranny
did
and
the
rest
of
the
people
here.
I'd
ask
like.
Is
there
something
I'm
forgetting
or
is
that
accurate.
D
D
A
Mean
I
I
think
the
closest
thing
is
what
we've
written
up
in
the
blm
page.
I
I
think
that
the
the
assertion
we
made
there
outside
of
that
I
don't
think
so.
No.
D
D
C
B
I
think
it's
interesting
to
think
about
you
know.
What's
I
guess
what
are
our
thoughts
at
the
community
committee
around
that
and
how
could
you
know
the
work
of
the
cpc
be
beneficial
to
those
thoughts.
D
Yeah,
I
think
what
part
of
the
conversation
came
out
is
like
say
as
part
of
the
impact
graduation
criteria.
Should
there
be
something
on
along
those
lines
and
that
spawned
the
discussion
of
well,
what
would
it
be
and
then
it
was
like.
Well,
let's
look
at
our
existing
projects
and
it's
like
okay,
so
yeah.
B
So
something
to
think
about
and
something
we'll
start
working
on.
I
it
reminds
me
of
another
thing
I'll
mention
too
we're
moving
the
cross
budget
council
meeting
to
a
bi-weekly
meeting,
still
alternating
between
1700
and
1900
utc,
which
east
coast
time
is
12-2.
B
The
thinking
is
that
we
may
do
where
we're
planning
to
do
like
kind
of
working
sessions
on
the
off
weeks
and
the
time
will
be
basically
the
same
time
as
the
previous
week.
So
we
had
a
2pm
meeting
this
week,
we'll
do
a
2pm
working
session
next
week
and
correspondingly
our
standards
meetings
will
kind
of
the
the
mirror
of
that.
So
when
our
cpc
meeting
is
2pm,
the
standards
is
12
or
1900
1700
and
then
two
weeks
later,
they'll
flip,
and
that
way
we
can
try
to
get.
B
You
know
more
folks
involved.
You
know,
I
know
that's
not
a
big
time
difference
too
so
thinking
about
folks
who
are
further
east
in
the
world.
You
know
I'm
not
sure
how
to
to
to
get
more
folks
involved
in
earlier
time
zones,
but
if
anybody
has
interest
where
these
times
are
not
workable,
so
definitely
let
us
know
over
an
issue.
B
I've
even
thought
about
maybe
just
having
a
long
open
issue
for
folks
who
the
times
don't
work
that
they
can
kind
of
register
their
interest
and
perhaps
suggest
a
different
time
zone
time
that
we
could
try
to
incorporate.
But
it's
hard
to
kind
of
know
what
interest
there
is
out
there.
So
I've
been
trying
to
think
about
that.
A
One
of
the
I
mean
what
to
kind
of
to
sarah's
point
from
that
last
meeting
did
have
we
considered
like
is
it?
Are
you
still
getting
requests
for
the
time
to
change,
to
something
that's
more
reasonable
for.
B
No
okay!
No,
but
I
I
don't
know
if
that's
just
because
of
some
barrier
that
we
don't
see,
you
know
yeah,
that's
why
I
thought
maybe
just
an
open
issue
that
people
could
you
know
if
they
come
across
if
they
could,
they
could
register
their
interests?
B
My
thinking
is,
if
you're
interested
in
the
work,
then
you
know
get
involved
in
github
and
then
you
know
well
we'll
kind
of
see
that
the
folks
who
are
involved
would
be
like.
Oh
okay,
but
I
don't
know
you
know
I
I'm
all
for
having
barriers
as
low
as
possible.
A
B
B
A
Cool
okay,
so
the
next
thing
next
thing
we're
moving
to
the
agenda
issues
and
prs
next
thing
on
the
agenda:
is
the
charter
update
from
the
tsc
michael?
Do
you
have
context
on
this.
D
A
Cool
sounds
good.
We
can
move
on
from
that.
Then
you
know
caveat
folks,
take
a
look
at
it
and
you
know
give
feedback.
I
I
imagine
this
will
relatively
land
in
ours
as
well.
I
think
I
made
a
pr
at
some
point
for
this.
I
could
be
wrong
on
that,
though,
but
yeah.
I
think
I
made
something
to
mirror
that
yeah.
I
did
yeah,
so
this.
D
A
Yeah
yeah
I
I
would
definitely
want
to
get
the
the
feedback
in
and
like
address
that
in
the
same
in
the
same
way,
so
you
don't
have
a
forking.
A
D
A
Yeah
cool
next
thing
on
the
agenda
is
addition
of
slack
without
discussion,
plus
community
fragmentation.
A
I
I
I
guess
I
I
can
give
brief
context
and
then
we
can
get
into
this.
Joe
pine91
opened
an
issue
expressing
frustration
and
discontentment
over
the
inclusion
of
the
slack
open,
js
foundation
slack
in
the
page
of
the
website,
because
it
was
quietly
added,
so
it
there
was
a
pr
that
was
open
for
a
week
before
merging
and
there
wasn't
the
irc
maintainers
weren't
pinged,
I
guess,
is
the
the
concern
they
have
or
the
frustration
they
have
yeah
and
then
there's
you
know
I
don't.
A
I
don't
want
to
speak
for
them
too
much
partially,
because
I
I
relatively
disagree-
and
so
I
probably
not
likely
to
put
it
in
like
a
favorable
light.
So
I
don't
want
to
speak
for
them
too
much
but
yeah.
They.
D
I'm
happy
to
jump
in
a
little
bit.
They're
like
I
can
totally
understand
their
frustration.
Yeah.
You
know,
they've
been
off
helping
to
moderate
the
irc
channel
for
a
while
and
to
sort
of
by
surprise
find
out
that
there's
been
another
channel
added,
that's
affecting
you
know,
people
are
moving
there.
I
can
totally
understand
the
frustration
of
that
right,
so
I
think
the
you
know-
and
I
think
they've
been
pretty
clear
about
trying
to
say,
they're,
not
arguing
one
way
or
the
other
in
terms
of
the
channels
or
whether
we
should
have
two
channels.
B
D
I
also
also
say
that,
like
it
was
kind
of
added
quietly,
but
I
don't
think
there
was
any
intent
in
in
that
sense
like
I
don't
think
anybody
was
trying
to
say,
hey,
let's
add
something
and
I'm
going
to
do
it
without
waiting
for
proper
input
or
you
know
the
the
pr
was
there.
We
didn't
get
a
lot
of
input
and
I
think
you
know
that's
yeah.
D
D
There
has
been
a
pr
to
revert
that
which
I
think
is
a
good
neck.
I
think
that's
a
good
step
and
a
great
sort
of
sign
of
hey
we're
just
trying
to
do
the
right
thing
here
as
opposed
to
anything.
So
I
think
reverting
that
and
then
going
through
a
pr
process
where
we
do
have
more
active
discussion
is
the
best
we
can
do
at
this
point
to
kind
of
address.
The
situation.
D
And
I
think
on
you
know
so
so
I
guess
the
next
steps
on
our
on
our
side
is
to
discuss.
You
know
the
communication
channels,
how
we
want
to
position
them
and
you
know
make
sure.
I
guess
that
that
we
do
that
in
a
in
an
issue
or
whatever,
where
we've
included
the
the
people
who
have
been
maintaining
the
irc.
B
A
I
mean,
though,
at
least
the
way
that
I
I've
seen
so
there's
multiple
things
there
node,
slackers
and
stuff
is,
I
think,
included
on
that
page.
I
could
be
wrong.
It's
just
lower
down
because
it's
like
it's
a
third-party
blessed
one.
If
it's
not
we,
we
should
have
a
section
for
this,
but
it's
not
like
maintained
by
the
project,
I
would
say
like
having
maybe
getting
started
like
community
resources
or
something
like
that
and
then
having
that
parallel.
What
comcom
has
done
around?
I
forget
what
the
forget.
A
What
the
name
of
the
thing
is
that
we
have
partner
partner
communities.
I
think
you
know
that
moving
to
that
and
like
having
that
as
a
section
in
that
page
sure,
I
think
that
makes
sense,
I'm
not
gonna,
I
don't
think
it's
unnecessary
or
a
barrier
to
do
that.
I
I
do
think
that
there
is
probably
a
distinction
between
things
that
are
like
relatively
officially
used
in
some
capacity
by
the
project
and
like
node.js
dev
is
we
people
use
that,
for
court
of
slack
is
also
being
like.
A
For
that,
for
like
work
on
the
project,
I
don't
think
the
intent
there,
at
least
from
what
I've
seen
and
from
everyone
I've
talked
to,
has
ever
been
help
and
the
the
simple
solution
there
might
be
getting
literally
getting
rid
of
the
node.js
channel
in
in
favor
of
just
the
namespaced
ones
or
like
also
pushing
you
know,
requesting
that
we
add
an
ask
anything
channel
and
like
having
that
be
the
support
not
just
for
node,
but
for
everything
in
in
the
openjs
foundation,
like,
I
think,
that's,
potentially
a
good
solution
that,
like
kind
of
helps
us
get
around
this
in
terms
of
like
this,
is
a
support
form.
A
It's
not.
I
I
I've
not
seen
it
as
that,
and
I've
not
seen
anyone
refer
to
it
or
look
to
it
as
that
outside
of.
Perhaps
how
do
I
make?
How
do
I
like
contribute
better,
like
contribution
is
different
than
consumption,
and
that's
how
I've
seen
this
so
far,
not
to
say
that
it
can't
ever
be
that,
but
that's
just
how
I've
seen
it
be
used.
Oh
boy,
I
turn
my
monitor
off,
so
I
hope
you
can
still
hear
me.
A
We
can
still
hear
you
cool,
I
wasn't
sure
if
I
turned
my
computer
off
so
yeah,
I
don't
know,
I
think
that's
that's
the
extent
of
like
my
perspective
here.
I
I
mean
there
yeah.
I
guess
I'll,
stop.
A
The
problem
with
that
is
that
there's
gonna
be
a
like
there's
already
a
lot,
and
I
think
that
that
list
is
changing
and
stuff,
perhaps
more,
defining
the
structure
that's
grown,
naturally,
which
is
like
the
name
spacing
and
then
giving
an
example
of
that.
So,
like
you
know,
node.js,
I
don't
know.
A
Just
dab
like
that's,
that's
it!
Well,
I
don't.
I
don't
want
to
compete
with
the
irc
thing
there
like
that
that,
because
that's
the
name
of
the
rc
so
like
node.js,
I
don't
know
website,
redesign
or
comcom
or
something
like
that
and
like
giving
that.
As
an
example,
I
I
think
is
the
low-hanging
fruit
there
yeah.
D
A
Don't
think
honestly,
I
don't
think
there
should
be
a
help
channel
outside
of
like,
if,
if
we
want
to
request
that
the
like,
like
work
with
the
foundation
to
have
a
generic
help
channel
for
all
of
projects,
but
I
also
don't
think
that's
like
related
to
node
really
like
this
is
something
that
there
is
apparently
a
desire
for,
and
so
we
can
have.
A
We
can
try
to
funnel,
like
people
do
ask
questions,
and
then
they
don't
get
answered
and,
like
that's
kind
of
a
situation,
I
think
we
should
try
to
avoid
is
like
having
people
asking
questions
because
they
don't
understand
the
format
of
the
space
and
so
like.
If
people
are
going
to
be
coming
here
to
ask
questions,
pushing
them
to
the
right
place,
either.
D
That
one
could
be
like
setting
the
expectation
right,
because
I've
seen
you
know
say
within
our
internal
slack
channels.
What
can?
What
can
be
quite
helpful
is
there's.
There
are
some
like
within
you
know,
ibm,
for
example,
there's
some
some
node
ones
and
a
lot
of
the
questions.
It's
not
like
people
ask
questions
and
the
node
team
answers
them
all.
G
D
A
lot
of
people
ask
questions
and
then
other
teams
help
answer
those,
and
so
I
could
see
it
being
useful
for
the
foundation,
slash
node
project
to
have
a
self-help
channel
where
it's
like.
Don't
you
know,
there's
no
expectation
that
the
node,
maintainers
or
project
members
will
necessarily
jump
in,
but
that
people
can
collaborate
on
questions
yeah.
It's
it's
useful
for
us
too,
because
you
know
we
can
then
look
at
that
as
to
see
what
they're
discussing
what
they're
talking
about.
D
A
B
D
Irc,
I
I
I
occasionally
check
in,
but
I'm
I
typically
check
in
on
some
of
the
other
channels.
Okay,
so
I
think
the
reality
is
that
some
people
will
end
up
using
slack
because
it's
there
and
if
you've
already
got
it
running,
it's
it's
more
convenient
than
irc
and
totally
on
the
other
side.
There's
other
people
who
much
prefer
irc
and
will
continue
to
use
irc
right.
So
even
for
no
node
core.
I
could
see
it
being
like
here
or
two
channels.
You
know
some
subset
of
the
people
will
be
on
either
one.
B
And
I
think
number
one.
I
think
that
we
can
move
this
conversation,
perhaps
in
part
to
you,
know
a
cpc
issue,
because
I
think
the
goal
is
to
have.
B
I
I
think
that
you
know
the
the
foundation
would
like
to
for
people
to
come
to
the
slack,
and
so
I
think
we
need
to
figure
out
like
how
do
we
want
to
handle,
because
I
think
people
are
naturally
going
to
be
asking
questions.
And
so
how
do
we
handle
that
yeah?
And
maybe
we
can
just
take
that
that
sort
of
part
of
the
conversation
there.
D
B
Yeah
yeah
because
I
think
the
ibm
one
that
I
I
have
visibility
into,
I
think,
is
great
because
it
is
yeah.
Like
there's
news,
you
know
there
are
updates.
There
are
people
asking
questions.
You
know,
I
think
it's
kind
of
a
robust
channel
for
us
internally.
B
D
B
B
A
Okay,
cool,
then
I
guess
with
that
we
can
probably
end
it.
Oh
wait!
No!
I'm
sorry
that
there's
another
thing.
I
thought
that
was
the
last
one.
Apologies.
A
B
E
Yeah
sure
so
joe
and
I
met
yesterday,
we
used
the
meeting
time.
You
know
for
the
node.js
to
see
where
we
stand
in
terms
of
you
know,
actually
launching
and
getting
things
are
going
up.
So
we
went
through
the
list
we
found
out
that
I
mean
document
page
was
completed
and
the
downloads
page
is
completed.
The
big
two
ones
are
the
whole
page.
There
were
a
few
things
that
so
I
I
did
read
your
comment.
Tierney
and
the
thing
is
that
we've
been.
E
So
that's
the
reason
why-
and
I
did
share
that
with
joe
yesterday
and
joe
thought-
that
it
would
be
good
to
just
overview
and
go
through
and
see
where
we
can
get
the
ball
rolling,
and
once
that
is
gone,
you
know
we
can
actually
finish
complete
like
certain
things
or
check
things
off,
so
that
that's
the
reason
yeah.
E
B
Think
part
of
this,
too,
is
that
you
know
the
folks
who
are
working
on
it.
Maybe
don't
always
feel
empowered
to
move
things
forward
and
I
think
sometimes
it's
a
little
confusing,
partially
bless
you
or
thank
you.
B
What
have
you
you
know
the
trying
to
make
these
pages
comply
with
the
design,
isn't
always
clear
in
part,
because
some
the
design
was
done
a
long
time
ago,
and
some
decisions
have
been
made
to
do
something
slightly
different
in
some
cases,
so
for
an
example
of
that
is
instead
of
having
company
logos,
having
like
open
js
foundation,
project
logos
on
on
the
page
on
the
home
page,
you
know
that
are
that
are
utilizing
node,
obviously,
and
then
another
example
is
the
community
page,
the
the
design
that
was
built
for
that
you
know
doesn't
seem
to
fit
with
exactly
what
you
know
we're
thinking.
B
Implementation
would
look
like,
so
you
know,
I
think
the
team
doesn't
feel
empowered
to
kind
of
move
forward
on
some
of
those
things
and
we
thought
well,
it
makes
sense,
maybe
to
bring
it
the
community
committee.
We
can
kind
of
look
at
them
and
make
some
decisions
if
that
makes
sense
and
move
some
of
this
stuff
forward.
B
You
know
on
that
note:
the
the
thinking
is,
the
documentation
page
is
done.
The
downloads
page
is
done.
The
community
page
there's
a
good
implementation
of
it,
but
doesn't
adhere
exactly
to
the
design
again
partially
because
we're
not
sure
the
design
fits
with
what
we
have
and
then
just
a
couple
of
things
on
the
home
page
are
sort
of
outstanding.
A
Mike
michael
one
question,
I
have
one
thing:
I've
like
that's
been
sitting
in
the
back
of
my
mind
for
a
while.
How
so
you
know
we're
building.
This
is
a
static
site
with
gatsby
nodes
docks,
as
they
are
ship
in
node
core.
How
my
concern
is
like.
Do
we
end
up
creating
and
like
I?
A
I
don't
think
this
should
prevent
a
website
from
doing
anything,
but,
like
I,
I
am
consistent
or
consistently
mildly
concerned
that
we're
going
to
end
up
creating
a
split
between
docks
that
ship
with
core
in
docks
that
ship
with
the
website
since,
like
docks
that
ship
with
the
website
are
effectively
like
just
that
paid
the
pages
that
are
in
core
right
now.
D
A
D
A
What
we're
doing
here
is
changing
that
rendering
to
it
to
a
custom
design,
and
I
think
that's
that's
more
of
the
thing
that
like
this
is,
this
is
less
of
a
when.
A
Yep
right,
so
I
guess
my
concern
is
like
maybe
there's
a
better
question
for
divya.
Like
is:
does
node
core
need
to
change
anything
for
us
to
be
able
to
do.
E
D
G
D
Good
or
bad
on
that
front,
but
but
I
yeah
I
wouldn't
I
guess
I'd
have
two
two
concerns
that
we
should
think
about.
Is
you
know
one
yeah?
It
should
still
be
automatically
generated
from
the
same
source
and
two
we
do
need
to
think
about
like
is
it
gonna
break
any
existing
links
because
you
know
there's
lots
of
searches
out
there.
There's
lots
of
references
to
the
docs.
B
So
we're
we're,
you
know,
nearing
the
end
of
the
meeting
time.
I
wonder
if
you
know
perhaps
instead
of
using
com
com
meeting
time,
we
can
just
try
to
get
some
folks
into
the
next
website
redesign
meeting
and
try
to
help
try
to
help
the
team.
B
It's
I
think
it's
pretty
far
along
you
know,
documentation
and
downloads
pages
are
considered
complete
and
the
home
page.
There's
just
a
couple
of
sort
of
open
questions
and
and
open
prs
that
that
I
think
aren't
finished.
You
know
I
I
think
still
need
some
refinement
and
then
the
documents-
the
the
the
maybe
maybe
divya,
can
you
show
the
community
page,
because
I
think
that's
one
that
we
sort
of
need.
It
would
be
good
to
have
a
decision
on
and
don't
forget.
B
I
cannot
share
my
screen
just
give
me
one
second
to
pull
them
up.
Yeah,
let's
focus
on
the
the
community
page
yeah,
because
we
have
two
of
them.
Let's
go.
Let
me.
E
E
Okay,
I'm
not
sharing
my
screen
now.
Can
you
guys
see
my
screen
yep
yeah?
Okay,
so
this
is
one
implementation
of
the
node.js
community
page
that
a
ahmad
and
his
team,
his
team
that,
like
from
him
and
his
you
know,
group
that
so
they
they
put
together.
You
know,
I
think,
a
pretty
reasonably
good
community
page.
In
my
opinion,
let
me
actually
make
it
bigger,
because
I
know
a
lot
yesterday,
joe
had
a
bit
of
a
rough
time,
seeing
what
just
because
screen
is
big.
B
D
Other
thing
that
yeah,
I
think
I'll
add
to
my
other
list,
is
like
what's
the
workflow,
because
I
know
people
are
pretty
comfortable
with
the
current
one
where,
like
you
know,
we
submit
blogs
and
vulnerabilities
and
stuff
they
show
up,
and
you
know,
there's
web
hooks
that
update
them
when
the
changes
get
made,
and
those
are
the
kinds
of
things
that
are
will
be
key-
that
those
all
still
work.
B
Yeah,
I
think
we'll
definitely
have
to
look
at
that,
as
we
kind
of
near.
D
E
Yeah,
so
if
you're
gonna
see
my
screen
now
this,
this
is
the
figma
design
that
we
have
currently.
C
A
Yeah,
okay,
sorry,
sorry
go
ahead
and
divvy
and
intro
yeah.
B
Yeah-
and
so
I
think
you
know
number
one-
I
I
have
some
issues
with
that
left
bar
a
little
bit,
which
obviously
this
is
what
two
three
years
too
late
designs.
But
you
know
some
of
those
things
are
things
that
we
don't
are
aren't
planning
on
having.
So
the
thought
was,
what
would
we
have
in
a
community
page?
We
kind
of
modeled
it
after
some
other.
You
know
successful
community
pages
in
the
community.
A
I
the
one
comment
there
is
like
the
the
other.
Successful
community
pages
are
like
ones
that
are
completely
like
the
electron.
One
is
unmaintained
and
they
hate
it,
or
we,
though,
like
it's,
the
project,
does
not
particularly
agree
like
the
project
that
it's
modeled
after
doesn't
particularly
agree
with
that.
Okay.
B
Okay,
I'm
not
sure
how
to.
A
Yeah,
sorry,
like
I,
I
think
I've
shared
that
context
before,
which
is
why
I
bring
it
up
again
but
yeah
so,
like
I
sorry
quacho,
no.
A
That's
that's
been
done
and
like
get
to
the
point
where
we're
implementing
like
a
full
website
design,
rather
than
I
mean
like
even
that
sidebar
like
if
we're
concerned
about
that
side,
when
our
sidebar
not
being
useful
here,
it
seems
like
that's
like
a
good
component
to
have
and,
like
you
know,
we
don't
have
I'm
trying
like
I
it's
a
it's
a
little
hard
to
see
this,
because
it's
the
aspect,
ratio
good
but
yeah,
like
you,
know
the
sidebar.
A
You
know
I
mean
education
tooling,
like
especially
with
pkjs
and
stuff
communication,
like
all
of
these
things
are
like
or
maybe
except
for,
like
we're.
Not
gonna
have
a
job
board
but
like
it'd,
be
cool
to
have
that
eventually,
but,
like
you
know,
that's
not
something
we're
gonna
have
now.
I
I
I
can
see
where
this
would
be
in
like
news
as
well.
I
can
see
where
this
this
could
be
useful
to
have
and
like
just
because
we're
not
planning
on
this
content.
D
D
A
I
think
this
news
is
different
than
that
news,
michael.
I
think
this
is
more
of
like
like
linking
out
to
to
medium
and
like
potentially
like
dev2
and
other
other
spaces,
but.
D
E
Yeah,
the
download
the
downloads
page
hasn't
been
merged
because
be,
but
like
it's
ready
like
I
can.
This
is
a
downloads
page
right
now:
okay,
yeah
yeah.
So
this
is
the
one
that's
like
there.
Yeah.
B
A
Mean
for
y'all
can
ignore
me.
That's
totally.
Fine,
like
y'all,
can
completely
ignore
the
the
the
feedback
I'm
providing
like,
but
I
I
am
like
relatively
and
you
know
again.
I
provided
this
feedback
in
the
in
the
issue
around
this.
I
we
we
currently
have
a
five-year-old
temporary
website
and
the
the
intent
or
purpose
of
like
starting
website
redesigning
and
kind
of
pushing
through
it
is
to
get
it
to
a
place
where
we
don't
have
a
temporary
design,
and
this
I
mean
like
honestly.
A
This
does
feel
like
a
contemporary
design
in
that
it's
just
inline
text.
This
isn't
like
a
design
so
much.
It
is,
as
it
is
content
and
so
like,
at
least
from
my
perspective,
there's
no
problem
in
like
waiting
or
prioritizing
things,
so
we
can
eventually
get
a
design
like
a
design
on
this
done,
but
like
merging
it
prior
to.
That
seems
like
it's
counter
to
the
point
of
my
understanding,
at
least
of
website,
redesign
of
like
not
having
something,
that's
temporary
and
hacked
together,
but
instead
having
something
that's
solid
and
like
polished.
B
Let
me
just
say:
number
one:
I'm
not
trying
to
ignore
your
advice,
I'm
actually
trying
to
take
it
and
and
and
find
a
way
to
implement
it.
So,
like.
I
think
the
first
question
is:
if
you
go
back
to
the
figma
design
divya.
The
first
question
is
that
sidebar?
Does
that
load
a
new
page,
or
does
that
like?
Would
we
have
one
page
in
the
sidebar
would
jump
down
to
it
like?
B
I
think,
that's
a
decision
we
need
to
make,
and
I
think
we
need
to
just
make
a
decision
make
decisions
on
what
should
be
in
the
community
page,
because
I
think
this,
the
sidebar,
perhaps
isn't
exactly
what
we
might
want.
D
I
I
think,
like
tierney's
point,
though,
is
almost
like:
if
you
took
the
exact
content,
that's
in
the
current
one,
but
improved
the
design
and
and
like
the
infrastructure
behind
it.
Yeah
that
would
give
you
the
you
know.
The
goal
was
to
get
a
better
infrastructure
and
something
we
can
build
on,
and
then
you
can
add
whatever
content
makes
sense
right,
but,
like
the
I
can
kind,
I
can
kind
of
agree
with
the.
D
B
F
B
B
E
I
mean
here's.
What
I
can
tell
you
that
what's
there
over
here
is
basically
just.
A
You
know,
take
this
the
grain
of
salt,
I
I
I
would
prefer
to
see
like
us
work
on
a
like
the
fun
the
building
blocks
on
upon
which
we
could
build
this
page
and
then
building
that
page
with
the
content
that
already
exists
here
rather
than
just
shipping,
this
specific
content.
A
Okay,
we
are
at
time,
though,
so
I
do
want
to
respect
people's
time
thanks
y'all
for
joining,
and
we
will
we'll
see
you
next
time.