►
From YouTube: Mentorship Team Meeting
Description
A
A
Just
repatriated
so
I
had
to
go
through
an
entire
auth
flow.
I
was
in
Canada
I
just
repatriated,
so
I
had
to
go
through
an
entire
awesome
flow.
Alright,
let's
go
ahead
and
get
started
and
thanks
everybody
for
joining.
Let's
go
and
have
everybody
introduce
themselves,
so
we,
you
know,
have
the
context
of
who's
here.
Our.
A
A
A
C
E
A
F
G
H
Hi
I'm
Zoltan
from
New,
Zealand,
Wellington
and
I'm,
working
with
no
GS
for
years,
and
also
as
a
front-end
developer
and
researching
on
Victoria
University
yeah
that
that's
me
and
I
try
to
help
others
to
learn
no
GS
typescript
JavaScript,
so
I'm
happy
to
be
a
mentor.
Thank
you
good
to
have
you
with
us
thanks.
A
I'll
meet
myself
great.
Well
thanks
for
joining
everybody,
so
we
had
a
great
meeting
last
week
with
the
moderation
team
that
shared
some
of
the
the
capabilities
and
also
you
know
correct
me.
If
you
would
characterize
the
this,
is
incorrect,
Ryan
the
limitations
of
the
the
moderation
team.
You
know
the
moderation
team
is
a
small
group
of
volunteers
inside
the
node.js
project
that
helped
facilitate
the
activities
and
keep
the
activities.
The
a
very
large
project
like
nodejs
does
safe
and
you
know
viable
for
everyone,
who's
attempting
to
collaborate
and
contribute
to
the
project.
A
Learned
that
the
that
the
you
know,
the
primary
ability
and
surface
area
of
the
the
moderation
team
is
really
associated
with
with
github.
The
project
has
been
experimenting
with
and
it
was
currently
debating
whether
we
fully
support
slack
as
a
community
committee.
Our
objective
is
to
support
everybody
in
the
know,
just
ecosystem,
whether
they
are
inside
of
node.js,
official
infrastructure
or
not.
A
But
then
there's.
This
kind
of
you
know
this
next
level
of
where
we,
as
members
and
volunteers
of
in
the
project,
have
committed
ourselves
to
to
collaborating
with
the
project
so
the
different
levels.
You
know:
we've
had
incredible
response
to
the
mentorship
program
and
interest
in
the
mentorship
program
and
a
lot
of
people
that
are
excited
about
getting
started,
but
you
know
as
we
as
we
get
prepared
and
as
we
work
to
match
people
up
with
the
project.
You
know
we
are.
A
You
have
the
the
three
members
of
the
the
mentorship
team
here,
myself,
Aguirre
and
Ahmed,
and
you
know
we
all
have
their
lives
and
work
and
all
of
our
other
responsibilities
to
take
care
of.
So
it
is
just
cognizant
of
that
and
then-
and
you
know,
one
of
the
things
that
emphasized-
there's
no
corporation,
you
know
magically
funding.
You
know
everything
behind
this.
A
I
hope
that's
obvious,
and
you
know
I
hope
that
your
response
in
that
is
how
could
I
help
more
because
you
know
kind
of
any
other
response
is
not
really
helpful.
So
then
you
know
I
bet
you,
you
know
you,
you
know
missed,
but
you
had
the
the
opportunity
to
catch
up
on
some
of
the
the
discussion,
and
you
know,
I
wanted
to.
C
C
So
I
wanted
to
like
to
touch
on
that
and
talk
more
about
that.
Also,
another
issue
we
talked
about
is
basically:
do
you
want
the
mentors
to
be
too
like
we
want
the
mentors
to
be
only
restricted
to
the
members
of
nodes?
So
if
that's
the
case,
we
need
to
recruit
the
mentors
to
be
members
of
the
node
project.
C
E
A
Yeah,
so
a
couple,
a
couple
of
takeaways
that
I
had
from
the
meeting
that
I
think
can
you
know
help
us
be
helped
better?
Is
you
know
if
we
want
help
from
the
moderation
team?
The
moderation
team
has
tooling
and
practices
that
that
can
be
shared
and
applied
more
readily
out
of
github
and
they're.
One
of
the
you
know,
as
occupied
you
know,
work
to
to
build
out
the
the
original
proposal
and
design
for,
for
you
know
what
we
have
in
the
mentorship
program.
A
You
know
not
even
necessarily
bad
behavior,
though
there's
there's
also
the
opportunity
for
that,
but
you
know
oftentimes
what
what
happens
is
there's
you
know
their
their
personal,
cultural,
interpersonal
behaviors,
that
you
know
someone
will
get
hurt
or
offended,
and
you
know
oftentimes
in
this
situation.
You
need
a
third
party
to
to
come
in
and
reconcile
that
the
situation-
and
you
know
right
now,
I'm
uncomfortable
with
our
strategy
for
dealing
with
that,
especially
since
you
know,
I've
highlighted
that
that
were
just
three
people
spread
throughout
the
the
world,
largely
in
Euro
to
North,
America
presidents.
A
Do
the
the
matching
on
github
right,
not
the
mentorship,
but
you
know
the
matching
process.
I
think
is
something
that,
and
you
know,
I
matching
a
feedback.
Loop
of
you
know
the
mentor,
mentee
relationship.
I,
think
you
know
an
easy
tweak
to
our
model
could
be
to
take
when
you
know,
we've
built
consensus
that
two
individuals
are
a
match
for
a
mentor-mentee
relationship.
We
can,
you
know,
create
an
issue
and
post
that
to
github
and
that
way
there's
a
public
record.
A
You
know,
as
is
our
general
practice,
we
create
a
public
record,
so
you
know
we
model
accountability
through
that.
So
we
create
a
public
record
that
these
two
individuals
have
established
a
a
mentor-mentee
relationship
and
then
we
can
use
that
as
a
forum
to
to
provide
feedback
and
also
have
some
visibility.
If
you
know
things
aren't
going
well,
if
there
are
unmet
expectations,
things
aren't
you
know,
people
are
showing
up.
You
know
in
one
very
plausible
scenario
is
there's
a
mentee,
the
mentor
and
the
mentee
and
one
of
the
two
parties.
A
You
know
just
you
know,
isn't
available.
You
know
we've
designed
this
process
for
or
you
know
six
months
you
know
mentor-mentee
relationship.
If
you
know
one
of
those
two
parties
are
not
able
to.
You
know,
maintain
their
commitment
to
the
mentor
mentee
relationship.
I.
Imagine
that
that
individual
would
want,
you
know,
be
rematched
they
and
the
individual
that
is
active.
There
would
want
to
be
rematched.
I
know
if
I
had
a
mentor
and
they
proved
not
to
be
available.
C
A
You
know,
since
we
have
so
many
mentors
here
who
are
perhaps
not
active
in
their
day
to
day
on
the
note
gist
project
in
the
comic
we
have
been
working
towards
a
you
know,
aspirational
goal
that
you
know
not
all
work
is
done
on
github,
but
you
know
that
said
every
decision
that
we
make
and
we
share
with
the
community
is,
you
know,
put
in
the
public
forum
and
in
really
the
you
know,
the
definitive
record
of
activity
is
done
on
github
for
for
the
the
note
gist
project,
so
you
know
we
really
for
it
to
be
real
and
you
know
accountable
and
visible
by
members
of
the
no
just
project
you
know
there
needs
to
be.
A
You
have
some
record
of
it
on
on
get
up
so
Mia.
My
thought
there
is,
you
know,
mentor
matching
and
you
know
we
might
even
have
to
in
our
first
cohort
the
first
batch
of
folks,
your
mentor
matching
and
a
you
know
responsible
member
of
the
the
no
gist
project
are
paired
up,
and
you
know,
maybe
you
know
the
level
of
detail
that
you
know
just
just
look
they're
trying
to
establish
the
minimum
level
of
work
that
we
you
know
we
need
to
do
to
put
in
a
you
know
record
into
github.
A
You
know
I'd
say
when
you
you
know,
are
meaning
together
on
a
project
that
you
would.
You
know,
update
your
issue
or
something
like
that,
and
you
know
log.
Okay,
we
had
a
meeting
on
this
date.
Just
you
know
add
to
the
public
record,
and
you
know
we
could
invite
folks
to
you
know,
share
some
of
the
some
of
what
they're
talking
about
I.
Think
that
would
be
a
healthy
practice
to
encourage
for
for
folks
that
you
know
we
had
a
discussion
about
mentorship
and
you
know
why
moderation
is
important.
B
What
they
will
create
like
teams,
so
they
will
have
discussions
on
d
top
in
detail
like
we
have
get
up
teams
on
the
Pascal
I
report,
so
you
can
have
multiple,
multiple
teams
for
each
mentor
and
mentee.
Probably
we
have
like
50
mentor.
59
sees
in
a
particular
team,
it's
three
mentors,
so
the
mental,
the
mental
scanner
shaded
thirds.
Maybe
any
question
is
being
asked
or
more
like
the
team
will
be
creating
on
it'll,
be
like
a
classroom
kind
of
second,
sir
everybody
can
ask.
B
A
A
A
You
know
one
that
we
do
I
think
the
different
different
experience
folks,
but
you
know
I
think
we
could
potentially
you
know,
benefit
and
help
more
people.
If
we
were
to
and
and
actually
provide
more
safety,
you
know
mice
might
in
one-to-one
safety.
Having
you
know,
a
mechanism,
for
you
know
folks,
to
deal
with
any
sort
of
uncomfortable
situate
would
be
greatly
mitigated
by
having
you
know.
One.
F
B
True
and
I
think
for
the
ones
of
honor
conversation
between
a
mentor
and
a
mentee
earn
if
a
mentor
and
a
mentee
serve
questing
to
have
the
single
this
question,
then
the
main
issue
open
issue
saying
I
want
to
have
the
private
section
with
lamento.
Then
it
waits
for
approvals
from
maybe
three
other
mentors
or
three
members
of
the
node.js
birds.
At
the
end
of
the
at
the
end
of
the
meeting,
we
want
to
see
probably
every
cop
to
be
to
the
Vita
charts
or
whatever
case
it
works.
B
A
A
B
More,
like
the
mental
decide
for
himself,
if
he's
going
to
take
off
that
extra
notes
like
sexually
to
you,
like
that's
just
I,
can't
just
do
that
for
now
so
I
prepare
I,
don't
know
it
makes
sense.
If
the
mentor
really
want
to
decide
if
he
will
be
able
to
delay
one
more
section
with
a
parts
column
then.
A
I
I
I
And
the
case
of
being
Bhutanese,
a
set
of
mental
mental
is
actually
Anthony,
wants
many
and
also
wants
one
another
mentor
chooses
to
and
the
only
ones
one
it's
going
to
seem
somehow
like
when
the
meant
sister
to
communicate
with
each
other,
and
they
realize
that
mentor
is
doing
dope
with
the
work
of
another
mentor.
It's
been
so
sure
different.
So
that's
actually
what
I
want
to
chip
in
okay.
B
B
It's
nobody's
fault
is
not.
Mental
Sports
is
more
like
the
mentor
can
just
do
that
at
a
particular
time.
First,
everybody
here
it
will
encourage
you.
You
won't
have
to
impose
the
talks.
The
talks
of
it
meant
to
have
any
one-on-one
resection
with
you.
You
can't
just
do
that.
So,
if
you
want
to
one
on
one
section,
you
have
to
discuss
with
your
mentor
and
from
the
from
the
issue.
We
know
that
you
have
any
101
section
with
your
mentor,
so
we
know
how
to
track
track.
This
session
you
had
with
the
mentorship.
B
J
We're
kind
of
having
many
mentees
to
one
mentor
could
work
well
as
if
we're
doing
a
project-based
approach,
where
you
know
you
have
people
have
signed
up
say
you
know
these.
Four
people
want
to
refactor
one
part
of
the
test
suite
and
you
actually
create
a
github
project
and
I
gradually
move
that
project
forward
over
the
six-month
period
and
where
I
think
that
couldn't
work
well
is
I
mean
the
nature
of
this.
Mentorship
will
probably
be
fairly
asynchronous.
J
A
If
we
have
small
squads
of
folks
like
if
it's
a
you
know,
group
of
three
individuals
that
you're
working
on
a
project
and
those
individuals
can,
you
know,
take
turns
or
work.
You
know
through
some
some
one-on-one
relationships,
I
think
that
that
you
know
could
facilitate.
You
know
some
of
that,
but
you
know
I
I
really
begin
to
get
uncomfortable.
A
If
we
have
too
many
models
right
like
we
need
kind
of,
you
know
for
the
first
cohort,
we
need
just
kind
of
pick
one,
and
you
know
as
much
as
possible
all
try
to
go
and
do
that
together
and
learn.
You
know
you
know,
learn,
learn
what
we're
gonna.
You
know
then
take
that
learning
forward
and
and
like
Ben
was
saying
iterate
in
an
open
source
approach
towards
being
able
to
do
this
better
for
war
and
in
help
more
people
bail.
K
Okay,
yeah,
so
I
was
gonna,
suggest
that
I
think
we
don't
run
with
the
101
model.
First
of
all,
because
that's
easier
to
manage,
because
I
currently
have
some
sort
of
mentorship
arrangement,
I
have
and
part
of
the
problems
I've
had
now
is
I've
now
heard
some
other
commitments
that
have
affected
my
commitment
to
that's.
You
know
good
that
I
created
so
I
suggest
that
we
start
first
one-on-one.
K
A
Easier
to
manage
and
easy
to
scale,
that's
you
know
as
someone
who
builds
teams
and
manages
people
I
find
one-on-one
mentorship
the
most
fulfilling,
but
also
the
hardest
thing
to
scale
and
one
of
the
most
difficult
things
to
manage,
because
in
that
one-on-one
situation
you
don't
have
anyone
to
sanity
check.
So
if
things
are
going
wrong
in
an
interpersonal
relationship
and
and
there's
no
way
for
those
individuals
to
to
get
feedback
or
gain
understanding,
you
know
I've
seen
that
you
know,
even
with
the
best
intentions,
go
wrong
many
times
so
yeah.
B
D
B
A
And
it's
mine
yeah,
we
build
consensus
by
a
you,
know,
sharing
understanding
here,
and
you
know
that
that's
you
know
important
for
us
to
to
recognize
their
different
points
of
view
and
different
goals
of
folks
here.
But
in
terms
of
building
a
program
you
know,
especially
in
their
first
iteration.
We
can
only
do
one
and-
and
we
may
only
be
able
to
work
through
one
project.
C
We
don't
have
to
have
full
coverage
over
the
mentors
and
mentees
at
the
first
like
iterations
like
we
can
have
the
queue
and
take
up
from
that
queue.
So
each
mentor
can
have
a
mentee
and
have
like
400
or
500
mentees
waiting
for
the
next,
like
matching
process,
hopefully
like
as
the
project
like
keeps
getting
more
and
more
momentum,
we
will
have
more
mentors
and
hopefully,
like
mentees,
would
love
to
become
mentors
for
the
next
iterations
like
after
six
months
and
stuff.
B
It
is
a
coalition
of
programs
that
we're
taking
for
this
fresh
situation,
so
you
have
to
select
one
of
them
and
be
part
of
it.
They
also
have
mentors
that
will
select
from
the
list
of
coalition
of
programs
that
we
have
for
this
press
situation.
Then
we
match
them.
Please
end
up
on
that
and
be
open
and
get
of
things
for
them.
B
J
Yeah,
it's
gonna,
say
that's
kind
of
what
I'm
advocating
to
you
and
what's
kind
of
neat
about
that
is
I
think
we
could
split
out
a
few
meaty
projects,
they're
fun
to
work
on
and
useful
to
the
node
project,
but
also
to
kind
of
give
us
something
a
center
or
the
conversation
with
mentees
around
and
that's
not
saying
there
wouldn't
be
one-on-one
mentorship.
It's
saying
that,
like
you
run
it
like
an
open
source
project
as
folks
run
into
walls,
you
know
split
off
and
help
folks
with
one-on-one
mentorship
as
necessary.
J
A
A
So
you
know
if
Baio
and
Samwell
and
I'm
trying
to
identify
the
one-on-ones
and
the
one
too
many's
as
groups,
you
know,
maybe
we
can
in
the
the
minutes
that
you
build
build
a
a
bit
of
consensus
amongst
the
folks
with
you
know
the
the
the
one
to
many
and
one
to
one
proposals
and
just
get
feedback,
and
you
know
get
to
a
point
where
we
we
select
one
and
move
forward.
Does
that
sound
like
a
good
strategy
for
us?
A
A
That
work,
and
so
I
I,
don't
feel
like
we
I
think
we
have
two
groups
now
of
individuals
that
need
to.
You
know,
discuss
things
further
and
yeah.
We
could
force
a
vote,
but
I,
don't
think
that
we
have
enough
consensus
that
you
know
or
and
enough
viable
strategy
in
place
to
say
all
right.
We
understand
what
we're
gonna
actually
go
and
do
with
the
next
step.
Does
that
make
sense
the
the
folks
I'm
happy
to
take
a
vote
right
now,
but
I
don't
think
it
would
be
good
outcome
for
either
party
it.
J
B
Yeah
sure
I
think
that
takes
us
about
talking
about
having
a
list
of
collections
that
we
want
to
work
on
and
there,
but
also
takes
us
about
the
which
I
don't
want
to
talk
about
anymore.
To
me,
how
a
conscientious
but
I
think
that
we'd
slow,
we've
discussed
so
far
today
we
should
probably
I,
don't
know
yet
if
we
means
getting
mentis,
involve
all
just
to
the
decisions
or
have
a
quorum,
but
I
don't.
B
So,
even
if
you
are
trying
to
have
a
pool
on
slack
I,
don't
know
what
the
outcome
is
going
to
be
like,
but
even
if
you're
also
going
to
have
a
full-on
meter,
I
also
don't
know
what
outcome
is
going
to
do
like
birds,
we
can
just
say
oK,
we've
started,
so
you
guys
should
probably
pick
from
one
of
these
collections.
Then,
if
you
know
able
to
meet
the
deadline,
then
you
have
to
counter
so
that
you
are
not
able
to
meet
meet
up
with
DCs
mentorship
program.
So.
A
A
Thank
you
very
much
and
at
this
point
I
would
like
to
say
thank
you
and
we'll
be
back
in
two
weeks.
Let's
work
on
github
during
this
time
to
build
consensus
and
provide
you
know
kind
feedback
to
other
people
in
there
their
perspectives,
and
you
know,
with
the
focus
that
you
know
we're
trying
to
get
and
you
know
do
put
for
something
that
folks
can
commit.
You
know
a
fair
amount
of
their
time
to
so
we
want
to
make
sure
that
folks
are
bought
in
all
right.
Thank
you
very
much
everybody.