►
From YouTube: Mentorship Team Meeting 2018-04-20
Description
B
Miles
so
welcome
everybody.
This
is
a
mentorship
team
meeting
and
today
we
are
graciously
joined
by
several
representatives
from
the
moderation
team
and
just
catching
everybody
up
where
we
are
in
the
mentorship
process.
So
Boop's
kicked
off.
We
have
sent
out
a
invitation
to
the
world.
You
know
stating
that
we're
running
a
mentorship
program
that
we're
going
to
be
helping
folks
engage
with
the
node.js
project
and
provide
support
on
that
and
we've
got
a
lot
of
positive
responses.
B
You
know
nearly
500
total
folks
and
we've
begun
directing
those
folks
to
the
medium
that
we
selected
as
our
primary
communication
channel
node
slackers
slack
its
community
slacked
managed
by
Justin.
It
was
invited
but
he'd
make
it
Justin
Jordan
Harbor
and
of
Airbnb
is
an
active
admin
there
and
I
was
just
added
this
past
week
as
an
admin
to
be
able
to
support
the
expected
and
they
expected
onslaught
that
did
come
in
to
that
slack.
B
So
you
know,
as
we
began
to
set
that
up,
and
you
know,
get
everything
going.
They
were
beginning
to
manage
expectations
and
you
know.
Invariably,
there
were
a
few
entitled
folks
that
were
where's
my
mentorship
right
now
and
yeah
I
have
been
continuing
to
set
expectations
with
folks
that
we
are
a
volunteer
group.
So
you
know
I
using
the
turn
of
phrase.
B
If
you
need
immediate
mentorship,
you've
come
to
the
wrong
place,
so
you
know
I
really
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
engaged
before
we
kick
off
our
first
cohort
of
mentor,
mentor,
mentors
and
mentees
to
really
engage
the
moderation
team
and
make
sure
that
you
know
we
aren't
getting
ahead
of
ourselves
and
then
having
to
backpedal.
When
you
know
something
invariably
will
go
wrong
right.
You
know
the
the
moderation
team.
B
B
So
our
a
request
to
the
moderation
team
is
not
come
moderate.
Our
thing,
though
you
know,
if
you,
if
you
want
to
mentor
and
and
help
there,
that
that'd
be
great.
It's
really
it.
You
know
a
information
gathering
process
and
from
there
yeah
we've
already
giri
has
begun
to
pull
together
a
subgroup
of
the
folks
that
are
volunteering.
So
we
have
a
lot
of
people
that
that
are
volunteering.
This
is
a
very
mentor
minded
group
and
but
those
those
individuals
don't
have
the
experience
and
the
tools
that
the
moderation
team
has.
B
So
my
my
thought
process
here
is
reach
out
to
the
moderation
team,
see
how
we
best
can
serve
this
new
platform
without
becoming
an
additional
burden
to
that
team,
and
you
know,
maybe
the
moderation
team
in
the
process
gets
more
team
members
and
we
begin
to
model
how
we're
gonna
attend
Shimada
rate.
You
know
this
this
channel
and
we
can
have
a
meaningful
discussion
around
how
we,
how
we
have
you
know
safe
exit
routes
for
folks
that
may
get
into
a
situation
in
a
mentorship
where
something's
not
right.
C
B
You
know
so
the
delineation
that
you
know
I
want
to
make
sure
that
everyone
understands
is
this
the
mentorship
team
and
then
there's
the
mentors
so
there's
a
team
inside
of
the
node.js
project
that
is
focused
on
the
facilitating
the
entire
thing
and
we
are
not
necessarily
mentors,
though
I
personally
am
participating
in
the
team.
You
know
with
the
hope
of
being
able
to
be
both
a
mentee
and
a
mentor
in
our
group,
but
we
got
a
bootstrap
it
somehow
so
yeah
that
that's
what
I
was
attempting
to
articulate
with
that
yeah.
C
What
the
second
thing
is.
Do
we
want
to
have
a
different
process
than
what's
existing
for
moderation
with
less
so
today,
people
can
email
the
report
at
nodejs,
org
email
and
it
comes
to
the
moderation
team
and
we're
able
to
do
things.
A
kind
of
wrench
that's
thrown
in.
There
is
the
fact
that,
if
your
primary.
C
D
C
D
The
kind
of
the
the
difficulty
here
with
moderating
a
slack
community
is
that
your
tools
are
very,
very
high-level,
very
blunt
right.
You
can
boot
somebody
off
the
team
or
you
can
DM
them
and
try
and
work
it
out
that
way
and
I
am
actually
I
need
to
circle
back
of
Ryan
after
this
meeting
to
talk
about
the
next
step,
so
we're
in
the
process
of
setting
up
an
on-call
rotation
for
the
moderation
team,
so.
C
D
Can
make
sure
that
we
have
coverage
over?
You
know
all
the
old
so
that
we're
actually
immediately
available
and
can
be
as
proactive
as
possible
around
this
stuff,
which
I
think
can
be
a
way
to
do
that,
but
to
do
that,
we'd
probably
want
to
use
the
existing
mechanisms
of
having
stuff
get
communicated
through
report,
and
so
to
kind
of
my
answer
to
Ryan's.
First
question
is
I
mean
to
set
questions,
but
I
don't
think
we
need
a
separate
process
for
this,
but
is
to
make
need
to
make
sure
that
everybody
involved.
D
B
B
The
everything
that
I
have
kind
of
been
assessing
keeps
pointing
me
back
to
you
know.
Maybe
we
should
try
to
figure
out
how
to
do
this
in
a
more
text-based
form,
and
you
know
that
way.
We
can
actually
facilitate
moderation
right
like
if
we
pop,
if
we're
popping
out
and
we're
putting
two
strangers
together
in
a
you,
know,
hangout
or
a
zoom,
and
they
don't
know
each
other
that
they
may
be
coming
from
different
cultural
backgrounds.
They
may
have
you
know
differing
levels
of
you
know.
D
If
I
can
break
in
for
just
a
second,
we
have
kind
of
an
ongoing
threaded
discussion
that
we've
been
having
with
in
the
moderation
group
is
trying
to
figure
out
what
the
actual
remit
is.
The
group
right,
like
one
of
the
first
things
that
we
had
to
established,
was
that
we're
not
primarily
a
policy
formation
body
right.
D
We
have
establishes
the
community
and,
like
I,
put
it
that
specific,
because
one
of
the
things
that
I
personally
am
pushing
us
to
avoid
doing
is
getting
into
this
world
were
like
tone.
Policing
right,
like
I,
don't
want
to
be
talking
about
how
people
are
saying
things.
I
want
to
be
talking
about
what
they're,
saying
and
making
sure
that
they're
there
being
respectful
and
professional
to
each
other
and
then
within
the
bounds
of
the
project,
so
there's
a
whole
bow
on
that.
D
D
There
are
a
lot
of
significant
decisions
that
need
to
be
made
and
without
some
sort
of
process
for
for
structuring
that,
then
people
are
either
going
to
be
like
well,
I
disagree
with
you,
so
I'm
going
to
say
that's
a
violation
of
the
code
of
conduct
because
I
don't
feel
like
I'm
being
respected,
which
is
not
great
for
anybody,
but
nobody
comes
out
of
that
feeling.
Good
or
you
know
like
people
trying
to
throw
their
weight
around
in
a
way
like
I
know,
I'm
a
senior
member
of
this
project.
D
Who
cares
that
you
think
blah
blah
so
like
one
of
the
things
that
we've
been
talking
about?
Is
this
notion
of
facilitation
right
like
what
what
has
happened
a
few
times
at
various
summits,
where
there's
somebody
whose
job
is
there
to
to
structure
the
discussion
and
that
structure
around
the
discussion?
We've
kind
of
been
talking
about
like
having
a
way
to
do
that
for
contentious
PRS
is
one
example.
Nice
say.
E
D
Somebody
to
raise
a
flag
and
say,
oh
I,
think
this
is
going
to
be
difficult.
Can
we
have
somebody
help
us
facilitate
this
discussion
and
like
actually
participate
in
the
discussion
on
the
PR
of
thread
or
the
issue,
so
that
we
can
work
through
this
in
a
way
that
everybody
knows
that?
Yes,
this
is
contentious
and
we're
gonna
have
people
that
are
going
to
make
sure
that
both
sides
are
getting
an
opportunity
to
make
sure
that
they're
heard
and
the
work
they're
kind
of
keeping
the
discussion
from
wandering
too
far
off
the
beam.
D
Something
like
that
sounds
like
it
could
be
very
useful
for
mentorship
process
and
one
of
the
things
that
we've
been
looking
at
getting
is
a
resource.
I
think
I
think
Tracy
has
been
talking
to
the
board
about.
This
is
getting
training
available
for
at
least
the
moderation
team,
conflict
resolution
and
some
other
thing
that
they
could
offer
us
is
training
around
some
of
this
notion
of
facilitation
and
one
of
the
things
that
I've
heard
Tracy
talk
about
a
couple
times
now
and
I.
Think
Ryan
will
have
to
back
me
up
on
this
more.
D
A
B
Great
well,
you
know,
I
have
already
last
onto
the
the
cognitive
bias
there
PR
that
just
landed
in
admin
and
have
been
in
passing
that
resource
on
to
our
mentors
just
establish
the
baseline.
So
you
know
so
far.
The
the
two
major
qualifications
that
they
have
been
couraging
folks
to
to
go
through
is
one
you're
in
agreement
and
aligned
with
our
code
of
conduct
right
baseline.
B
You
know
acceptance
criteria,
you
know,
that
is
how
you
know
we're
operating
here
and
our
you
know
how
we
convey
acceptable
behavior
and
then
you
know
it's
kind
of
you
know
backwards,
but
you
know
cognitive
bias.
You
know,
on
top
of
that,
it
comes
second
in
really.
You
know
honestly,
probably
should
come
first,
but
you
know
if
we
need
to
have
a
conversation
about
the
code
of
conduct,
the
cognitive
bias,
training
and
then
come
back
and
talk
to
us
basically
yeah.
B
A
B
There
is
a
I'm
just
getting
every
bit
of
code.
There
is,
and
you
know
it's
it's
a
scoping
criteria,
so
we
have
scooped
to
you,
know
the
node.js
project
right.
This
isn't
generally
a
mentorship.
This
is
not
you
know,
helping
you
directly
get
a
job.
You
know
a
lot
of
folks
that
are
interested
or
that
have
chimed
into
internship
channel
and
slack
I
mentioned
that
there
you
know
job
seeking.
So
you
know
that
is
great,
but
you
know
what
we're
really
trying
to
do
is
help.
B
That
make
sense
miles
yep.
Thank
you
very
much
yeah.
You
know
keeping
it
simple
and
you
know,
because
we
are
scoped
to
the
you
know.
I
guess
know
that
there's
there's
a
step
before
the
code
of
conduct
because
we
were
scopes,
is
an
odious
project.
Yeah.
We
are
operating
with
the
no
jest
projects
code
of
conduct
and
to
further
your
ability
to
operate
within
that
and
to
work
effectively
with
folks.
You
know
coming
from
lots
of
different
backgrounds.
You
know
like
the
cognitive
bias,
training,
resources,
okay,.
B
Who's
gone
through
those
resources,
as
anyone
actually
checked
them
out
there.
Okay,
you
know
it's,
it's
not
what
I
don't
think
it
is
what
we
as
a
community
would
put
forth
if
we
were
to
build
community
resources
but
absence
any
other
resources.
You
know,
I
think
it's
a
a
useful
way
of
getting
things
started
and
I.
Think
it's
a
nice
way
for
us
to
you
know
not
get
lost
in
opinionated
right.
These
are
not
a
opinions.
These
are
you
know,
backed
by
by
science
and
social
science,
and
you
know
we're
helping
folks
deal
with
that.
E
Okay,
so
so
far,
based
on
the
moderation,
what
I
actually
had
in
mind
for
the
moderation
I
was
thinking
eat.
The
moderation
thing
can
take
over
the
whole
moderation
process
for
the
mentorship
program
that
is
acting
as
watchdogs
towards
the
mentors
and
the
mentees
relationship
and
all
of
us
other
stuff,
then
probably
some
mentors
which
has
volunteered
to
be
parts
of
the
program
and
also
want
to
help
facilitate.
E
Then,
instead
of
saying
that
the
mentorship
materials
we
can
say
there
are
mentors
cheap
facilitators
in
the
sense
that
they
are
going
to
help
us
with
the
onboarding
process,
getting
folks
to
know
what
you
want
to
do
and
get
you
to
the
rights.
Mentee
I
know,
I,
think
that
was
the
major
purpose.
Why
I
tried
designing
the
mentorship
directory
for
mentees
to
be
able
to
go
through
mentors
by
you
and
know?
What's
they
can
offer
if
they're
going
to
stick
with
the
Pascal,
a
mentor
or
the
ones
who
switch
over
to
a
different
mental?
E
We
have
a
topic
streamline
towards
what
we're
doing
we'll
have
mentors
or
main
teach
complaining
that
a
mentor
does
not
know
what
he's
doing,
because,
probably
you
are
better
than
that
particular
mentor.
Don't
you
avoid
such
sinners?
I
would
love
if
all
the
mentors
can
like
so
meeting,
will
I
see
a
resume
or
will
I
see
a
form
where
you
also
agree
to
the
code
of
conduct
doesn't
establish
but
is
not
just
foundation
who
wants
us
to
write
a
new
code
of
conduct,
but
stick
with
what
we
already
have
right.
E
If
they
agree
to
the
COC
thing
giving
us
what
they
know,
then
it
starts
much
in
mentors
and
inmate
see
based
on
what
men
she
wants
to
learn
from
mentor.
That
is
like
what
I
think
would
be
very
nice
for
us
to
start
the
whole
mentorship,
moderators
and
mentorship
facilities
on
the
whole
mentorship
process.
I
didn't
know
what
any
other
person
thinks
about
that,
but
just.
E
A
Quick
clarifying
question
about
that.
So
you
mentioned
the
scenario
where
mentees
potentially
have
more
experience
than
Mentors
and
I
was
curious.
If,
overall
in
the
program-
and
my
apologies-
if
this
has
already
been
talked
about-
but
are
there
specific
parts
in
the
project
that
mentors
are
expected
to
be
focused
on
and
is
there
a
minimum
qualification
for
activity
in
the
project
to
qualify
as
a
mentor.
E
No
fees
mentors
like
so
intently
I
was
like
he
was
expecting
to
be
a
mentee.
He
read
through
some
of
what
the
mentors
were
saying
about
and
stuff,
and
he
noticed
that
he
was
better
than
them
like.
Okay.
If
he's,
though,
is
what
you
think
I'm
going
to
get
back
to
the
leadership
team
and
we
can
discuss
on
having
different
kind
of
maintains,
does
probably
it's
all
group
or
something
but
I
just
tried
to
notes.
A
Okay,
so
two
more
points
that
I'm
just
thinking
on
here
and
one
is
like
I
was
I,
guess
a
little
bit
confused
then,
because
I
was
under
the
impression
that
this
mentorship
program
would
be
much
more
about
the
node.js
project
and
not
just
general
mentorship,
not
that
that's
a
problem
but
more
from
a
communication
standpoint.
That
may
be
a
good
thing
to
make
sure
that
the
project
is
aware
of,
and
maybe
you've
been
communicating
and
I
just
missed
it.
So
it's
more
just
like
more
communication
around
that
would
probably
be
good.
E
So,
from
the
pretty
from
the
previous
meeting
you
had
last
week,
we
agreed
that
he
meant
that
the
program
is
going
to
focus,
was
more
of
the
chassis
and
working
on
the
north,
and
yes-
and
all
these
other
person
says
the
dollars
like
all
major
from
the
last
meeting.
I
can
do
it
from
rights
done,
but
those
where
we
focused
more
earned
from
the
last
meeting.
So
what
we're
looking
towards?
E
Having
mentors
that
have
strong
hold
on
what
the
node
modules
and
what's
not
objects
alike,
so
they
can
actually
help
the
main
T's
work
on
this
particular
knowledge.
I
think
what
she
suggested
about
having
a
guideline
for
men
first
or
qualification
for
Mentors.
It's
something
that
we
have
to
look
into.
I,
don't
know
if
you
can
draft
out
some
qualifications
for
some
women
to
be
eligible
to
be
a
mentor
mouth
I,
think
that
should
be
best
in
order
to
avoid
be
whole
subgroup
kind
of
stuff
and
I
know
so.
B
If
I
could
jump
in
here
so
one
and
we'll
come
back
to
it,
we
need
to
touch
on.
You
know,
moderation,
team,
there's,
there's
a
comment
that
you
got
into
the
very
beginning
with
moderation.
People
do
a
thing
and
we
need
to
come
back
to
that.
But
let's
continue
the
discussion
about
matching
mentors.
So
you
know
in
our
last
meeting
you
know
actually
was
James
Snell.
B
Wasn't
it
wasn't
Austin
James
snow
and
you
know
a
couple
other
folks,
representatives
from
the
TSC,
you
know
shared
a
couple
projects
inside
of
the
the
TSC
that
we
could
focus
on
yesterday
at
the
calm
calm
meeting
I
raised
a
call-out
to
individuals
in
the
comm
come
to
input
fourth
projects
in
the
same
way.
So
it's
a
great
opportunity
for
folks
to
you,
know
potentially
add
new
team
members
to
the
the
project
and
by
doing
that,
yeah.
G
F
Those
six
months
ones
I'm
just
interests
like
in
you
know,
thinking
that
we
can
reach
out
to
like
the
working
groups
and
see,
if
you
know,
is
there
some
matchmaking
process
to
say.
Are
there
people
interested
in
some
of
the
things
the
working
groups
are
working
on
and
using
that
as
a
way
to
figure
out
some
longer-term
projects,
yep.
B
B
Then
you
know
the
logistical
concerns
and
what
I
want
to
emphasize
to
Gary
who's,
a
team
member
is,
you
know
we
have
no
ability
to
to
dictate
to
any
other
team,
so
we
can
ask
we
can
ask
for
help,
and
in
general,
in
you
know
anything
in
the
node.js
project,
we're
all
volunteers.
So
I
assume
that
that
you
know
the
the
teams
that
we're
working
with
are
understaffed
and
don't
have
enough
resources.
So
you
know
if
we're
asking
the
moderation
team
for
help.
B
B
Yeah
I
know
you've
been
beginning
to
work
with
some
of
the
to
the
mentors
and
mentees
and
individuals
who
are
interested
in
helping
facilitate
their.
You
know
that
would
be
you
know
fantastic
for
us
to
begin
to
to
organize
those
individuals
and
I.
Guess
the
big
ask
is
you
know
if
the
the
moderation
team
is
ready
to
go
down
this
journey
of
facilitation?
B
C
Yes,
Dania
you're.
Definitely
right,
we
are
understaffed,
and
so
in
the
last
moderation
team
meeting
we
did
discuss
a
facilitation
proposal
and
I'll
probably
be
opening
a
PR
for
that
today.
So
I'll
try
to
CC
your
team,
so
you
can
take
a
look,
I
think
in
terms
of
like
bodies.
We
probably
can't
contribute
anything,
but
I
think
we
can
definitely
provide
guidance.
I
think
the
key
thing
I
think
you're
I
completely
agree
that
there's
may
be
some
danger
in
the
project
that
you
want
to
like
preempt
and
I.
C
Basically
think
of
where
everything
could
go
wrong
and
try
to
figure
out
what
what
should
happen
like,
what's
like
the
ideal
scenario
and
then
and
then
basically
how
you
want
to
build
a
process
around,
that
I
think
we
can
definitely
support
moderation
around
github
stuff,
that's
kind
of
our
expertise
and
we
can
provide
guidance,
and
we
can
you
know
if
the
facilitation
thing
goes
through.
One
of
the
things
things
about
the
facilitation
facilitators
proposal.
Is
it's
not
just
us
who
can
be
facilitators?
D
Whether
that's
you
know,
one-on-one
voice,
chats
or
or
you
know,
using
other
mechanisms
for
tools
like
like
just
just
just
spitballing
I'm,
not
saying
this
is
something
I,
but
he's
actually
done
but,
like
you
know,
having
a
discord
team
for
mentorship
or
having
some
or
getter
or
some
other
venue
that
we
don't
know
about
right.
Like
the
like,
it's
it's
it's
a
if
we
can
keep
everybody
if
we
can
kind
of
as
much
as
possible
take
advantage
of
the
existing
processes
and
structures
that
we
already
have.
D
That
will
act
as
a
force
multiplier
for
being
able
to
get
at
the
resources
of
the
team
because,
like
the
the
problem
with
having
has
come
in
and
kind
of,
join
with,
you
like
Ryan
said.
Is
that
I?
Don't
think
any
of
us
really
have
the
time
to
do
that,
even
if
we
wanted
to-
and
maybe
we
do-
maybe
we
don't
want
to
but
like
beyond
that
we
don't
really
have
the
resources
to
do
that
and,
like
you
know,
to
to
embed
with
that.
D
That's
a
pretty
heavy
time
commitment,
even
if
we
had
all
the
time
in
the
world,
and
so
it's
kind
of
better
to
think
about.
Like
yeah,
we
all
are
running
short
staff
for
a
lot
of
this
stuff
like
this
is
open
source
work,
there's
never
enough
bodies
to
go
around
and
actually
make
all
this
stuff
happen.
So
how
can
we
actually
kind
of
get
an
economy
of
scale
using
the
tools
that
we
already
have
available
to
us?
Yep.
B
Yeah
I
think
my
biggest
takeaway.
Thank
you
for
us.
My
biggest
takeaway
is
really
you
know,
let's
figure
out
the
the
the
way
in
the
first
cohort
to
have
a
meaningful
mentorship
that
can
happen.
You
know
in
an
open
forum
on
get
up,
you
know,
I,
don't
know
if
it's
issue
based
or
PR
based,
you
know
I
kind
of
hate.
B
You
know
forcing
this
your
people
process
into
github,
but
it
is
that
is
there.
That
is
the
forum
work
where
we
have
the
best
resources,
and
you
know
it.
It
also.
You
know
realistically
on
boards,
folks
into
how
we
operate
here
in
the
node.js
project.
Right
we're.
You
know,
yeah
you're
interested
in
becoming
a
part
of
this.
Well,
we
spend
a
you
know
a
fair
amount
of
our
time
in
github.
B
You
know
collaborating
together.
So
you
know
that
is
our
primary
forum,
and
you
know
so
so
my
takeaway
is,
is
you
know,
mentorship
team,
we're
gonna,
look
at
that
and
figure
out
how
we
can
adapt
the
model
that
we've
laid
out
into
a
github
based
workflow
and
you
know,
have
have
slack
well:
we've
invited
a
lot
of
people.
Just
don't
slack
so
we
probably
have
to
you
know,
keep
that
going.
B
D
Let
me
let
me
jump
in
really
quick
like
there
is.
There
is
something
that
I've
kind
of
learned
through
the
years,
which
is
that
yeah,
it's
generally
not
a
good
idea
to
try
and
torque
a
tool
to
support
something
that
it's
not
good
for
may
very
well,
be
that
that
github
is
not
a
good
way
to
try
and
structure
a
mentorship
relationship,
and
so,
like
I,
don't
want
to
say,
like
we
have
a
that,
the
slack
team
exists
number
of
people
paying
attention
to
it.
D
There
may
not
be
super
high
representation
from
the
moderation
team,
but
that
may
or
may
not
actually
be
necessary.
But
again,
if
you're
going
to
be
using
slack
for
this
stuff,
you
know
you
slack
the
way
it's
meant
to
be
used
and
like
make
sure
that
those
discussions
are
happening
in
public
groups
right.
G
D
Sure
that
anybody
can
be
seeing
the
interaction
and
try
as
much
as
possible
to
discourage
people
from
taking
stuff
dark
like
there's.
This
is
something
I
observed
watching
people
at
slack
how
they
use
slack.
You
know
strong
bias
there
to
try
and
push
stuff
out
of
private
conversations
and
into
a
broader
venue,
like
particularly
anything
having
to
do
with
transparency
management
course.
Correction.
Like
those
live
there,
there's
a
kind
of
a
tendency
that
a
number
of
us
have
to
try
and
keep
stuff
private,
because
it
may
be
something
that
brings
feelings
in
because.
G
D
So,
if
you
can
make
it
work
in
such
a
way
that
people
are
doing
these
things
in
a
place
where
everybody
can
see
what's
going
on
and
to
inculcate
that
culture
like
a
particularly
in
the
mentors,
if
you
make
that
an
expectation
you're
going
to
have
communications
with
the
mentee
about
something
try
to
frame
that
in
a
way
that
it
can
be
had
in
public
and
then
do
it
in
public,
then
I
think
that
will
be
very
helpful
and
help
me
in
the
long
run.
So.
A
Forrest
I'm
gonna
give
a
tiny
bit
of
pushback
on
that,
not
a
huge
amount,
but
having
done
a
mentorship
program
in
node
with
with
Richie
in
the
past.
One
thing
that
I
do
know
is
that
people
who
are
early,
who
are
talking
about
ideas
that
are
maybe
embarrassing
that
are
trying
to
like
figure
things
out,
may
not
be
comfortable
enough
to
do
that
in
a
public
setting,
there's
parts
of
a
mentor-mentee
relationship,
that
is
a
private
one-to-one
relationship,
so.
D
D
The
limits
of
your
own
understanding
to
make
clear
that,
like
the
purpose
of
this,
is
for
everybody
to
get
something
out
of
it
by
learning
stuff
and
like
why
I
hear
what
you're
saying
miles,
I,
also
kind
of
have
to
push
back
against
your
push
back
just
a
tiny
little
bit
like
the
the
this
is.
This
is
really
kind
of
a
an
important
thing
to
get
right
around
trust
and
safety,
which
is
like
you
need
to
make
clear
that,
like
how
do
I
put.
D
That's
like
you
have
to
structure
the
discourse
in
such
a
way
that
accountability
is
baked
in
and
you
are
when
you
are
too
supportive
of
people
going
private
like
I've.
Seen
this
happen
just
in
countless
communities
where
you
wouldn't
expect
this
kind
of
thing
to
happen
at
all
like
that,
creates
an
opportunity
for
people
who
are
acting
in
bad
faith
to
get
in
there
and
do
stuff
that
can
make
people
really
uncomfortable
and
so
to
the
degree
to
which
you
can
minimize
that
you
can
make
for
a
self-correcting
system.
A
D
You
know
like
a
not
everybody
has
to
be
paying
attention
to
this
stuff.
If
there's
only
like
two
or
three
people
in
a
channel,
that's
fine,
but
the
idea
is
that
people
can
see
what's
going
on
and
can
come
in
and
participate
and
like
like,
like
it's
it's
more
a
a
consciousness
of
the
fact.
This
is
something
some
anybody
can
see
right
like
it's.
It's
it's
it's
a
little
bit
pen
off
the
Commish,
but
like
in
a
way
that
I
think
is
healthy
and
constructive.
E
I
I
really
to
be
cheats
in
like
what
we
encourage
mentees
for
mentors
to
make
or
if
they
feel
uncomfortable
or
with
something
it
meant.
I
meant
to
invite
assault
is
doing
make
reports
directly
to
anybody
that
is
visible
in
church.
At
the
end,
the
moderation
if
a
report
is
being
made
concerning
the
way
someone
speaks
sown
privately.
When
we
are
not
there
to
watch
over
the
person,
then
we
can
pick
options
on
that
particular
individual
I.
E
Don't
know
if
they'll
be
helpful,
because
from
my
neutral
experience
it's
mentoring,
people
you
have
to
create
that's
very,
very,
very
comfortable
relationship
for
the
persisting.
Do
you
are
mentoring
because
it's
not
completely
possible
for
you
to
the
public
mentoring
system,
but
if
you
are
able
to
have
a
one-on-one
relationship,
mentor
mentee,
this
is
my
main
see.
This
is
my
mind.
This
is
what
is
teaching
me
and
this
wasn't
like
it
from
him
and
I
think
dummy
work.
E
If
you
have
the
kind
of
up
free
of
an
idea
around
the
program
that
don't
talk,
see
the
way
you
don't
like.
You
make
your
reports
to
this
particular
person
and
this
person
is
going
to
help
you
walk
through
that
before
you
make
I,
don't
know
if
if
what
it
doesn't
make
sense,
because
I
think
that
is
going
to
work,
if
people
start
making
reports
for
themselves,
then
we
take
actions
based
on
the
reports
they
make
me
baby
during
like
if
they
have
a
conversation,
that's
probably
on
Jim.
E
If
the
mentee
should
call
in
Mexico,
we
would
like
to
see
a
video
of
the
conversation
we
had
stuff
like
that.
Just
we
are
trying
to
guide
them
through
the
whole
process
because
they
probably
want
to
learn
something
from
so
on
and
sending
the
message
doesn't
make
you
learn
it
so
fast,
but
having
a
heated
conversation
actually
helps
it's
such
a
mentoring
process.
E
A
Would
like
to
encourage
not
over
optimizing
on
this
too
early
I
mean
the
project
as
a
whole
has
run
mentorship
programs
before
we
have
500,
plus
collaborators
across
the
whole
project,
who
have
been
working
in
all
sorts
of
different
groups,
and
these
are
not
problems
that
we
have
had
at
large
I
recognize
that,
because
we're
talking
about
a
mentor
and
mentee
relationship.
This
is
something
that
is
a
little
bit
more
sensitive,
but
I.
B
A
A
A
Anyone
who
has
a
commitment
like,
for
example,
if
we
made
the
the
first
round
of
the
mentee
program,
get
your
commitment
on
node
and
made
all
the
mentor
there's
people
who
already
have
commitments,
it's
a
really
clear
goal,
and
it's
all
the
mentors
or
people
who
are
already
bought
into
our
whole
process
and
we
can
rely
on
all
of
the
mentorships
all
of
the
moderation
stuff
we
already
have
I,
don't
think
we
would
need
anything
too
much
extra.
On
top
of
it,
a
little.
C
I
think
I
think
vetting
mentors.
It
goes
a
long
way.
It's
you
know,
keeping
keeping
problems
out
in
in
moderation
space.
Most
of
the
issues
that
we've
seen
are
people
who
were
not
collaborators
collaborators
are
usually
more
well
behaved
and
if
they
do
fall
like
something
does
come
up,
there's
you
can
communicate
with
them
much
easier
and.
A
And
aguirre
I
just
want
to
clarify
that
I
think
all
the
things
that
you're
bringing
up
are
really
important
and
are
things
that
if
this
program
were
to
grow
in
scale,
we
would
have
to
worry
about.
But
my
main
concern
is
that
if
we
focus
on
trying
to
solve
all
of
this
early
on
that,
you
will
just
take
too
long
to
get
anything
going
and
that
if
we
scope
it
really
quickly
to
people
that
we
know,
we
won't
have
to
worry
about
these
problems
with
or
at
the
very
least
we
have
a
rapport
with.
A
We
can
kind
of
introduce
those
kinds
of
problems
as
we
deal
with
them,
which
is
less
than
ideal.
Obviously,
but
I
do
the
I.
Myself
have
been
at
risk
of
overthinking
everything
and
trying
to
codify
stuff
to
a
fault
in
the
past,
and
it's
things.
I've
received
pushback
on
so
I'm
just
trying
to
make
sure
that
we
set
everything
up
for
success
and
good
velocity
mm-hmm.
B
And
we're
here
we're
trying
to
learn
right
like
we're
all
you're
trying
to
collectively
build
that
process.
Ben.
You
had
some
great
comments
in
chat.
I'd
love
to
you
know.
Have
you
sure
that
everybody,
if
you're
in
a
position
where
you
can
their
voice,
because
the
books
on
the
public
record
won't
see
the
chat
yeah.
G
Can
you
hear
me
I
was
just
saying
that
mumait
be
instead
of
thinking
of
the
mentor
mentee
relationship
as
a
one-to-one
relationship.
If
a
mentor,
you
know
had
a
group
of
four
like-minded
people
who
all
were
interested
in
sig
landing
a
pull
request
in
the
same
part
of
that
node
code
base
as
an
example,
maybe
you
could
have
that
conversation
in
a
more
public
place,
but
it's
a
group
of
four
people.
G
You
know
in
a
slack
channel
or
something
with
some
moderation
on
top
of
it,
rather
than
a
more
private
one-on-one
conversation,
which
I
think
is
where
forest
is
concerned
about.
You
know
having
no
oversight
of
what's
happening
and
I've
seen
that
work
really
well,
that's
the
approach
taken
at
the
mentorship
thing,
I've
been
going
to
an
Illinois
every
year.
B
You
know
that
goes
a
long
way
and
you
know
the
gen
minder
that
as
much
as
possible,
we
should
be
framing
things
in
github
and
working
with
our
existing
moderation
tools
is,
is
fantastic
and
you
know,
rather
than
you
know,
developing
out
private
rooms
or
spaces
inside
of
slack.
You
know,
I'll
be
working
with
that,
the
mentorship
team
to
define
those
collaboration
spaces.
You
know
somewhere
on
github,
where
the
record
of
the
meetings
and
and
action
items
and
stuff
like
that
are
flowing
through
github
I,
think
that'll,
make
things
sane
and
also
logistically
I.
B
Think
they'll
make
you
know
our
ability
to
manage
from
you
know
a
handful
of
folks
in
the
first
cohort
to
you
know
hundreds
of
folks,
you
know
as
folks
expressed
interest.
You
know
we
need
to.
You
know
be
operating
in
an
area
where
we
can
even
just
have
the
ability
to
manage
that
and
a
bunch
of
private
channels.
You
know
with
five
or
so
team
members
we're
just
you
know
far
from
being
able
to
manage
that
I.
E
Completely
agree
with
you:
if
we
are
going
to
onboard
all
interest,
big
collaborators
should
be
like
okay
contain
the
node
to
do.
If
we
can
make
use
of
that
or
mentors
to
one
of
those
out
there
and
submit
a
pull
request,
then,
if
the
purpose
is
they
make,
the
elemental
becomes
a
collaborator.
Officially,
welcome
you
to
the
program
right.
E
A
One
thing
to
add
to
that
when
we're
saying
adding
them
as
collaborators
I
was
thinking
that
we
would
work
out
of
our
current
existing
pool
of
collaborators
on
the
node
project
with
commitments
that
was
what
I
was
thinking.
I
mean
doesn't
need
to
be
exactly
the
way
I
framed
it,
but,
based
on
what
Aguirre
was
just
saying,
are
you
implying
that?
Rather
you
would
be
onboarding
the
mentors
as
collaborators
as
part
of
the
project
right.
E
A
B
That's
where
I'm
gonna,
we
can.
Let
folks
drop
a
Giri
if
you,
if
you
could
stay
around
we'll,
have
a
little
bit
of
a
private
session,
and
you
know
discuss
that.
I
am
post
and
I'm
going
to
say
goodbye
to
our
YouTube
folks,
thanks
a
lot
for
for
tuning
in
and
listening
to
us
develop
out.
This
program
is.