►
Description
A
If
not,
I
will
mention
that
it's
the
board
meeting
this
week.
So
if
there's
anything
that
you,
you
think
we
should
bring
up
to
the
board
or
questions
that
you
had
on
that
front.
Let
me
know
taking
a
quick
look
at
the
the
project
we
have
with
things
to
be
brought
to
the
board.
There
are
a
couple
things.
A
One
was
our
request
for
build
resources.
A
quick
update
on
that
is,
you
know.
I
I
had
gotten
some
suggested
people
from
some
of
the
board
members
who
might
get
involved.
Unfortunately,
they
didn't
pan
out
so
I'm
gonna
go
back
and
have
that
on
the
agenda
for
the
the
meeting
this
week
again
to
hopefully
get
some
additional
suggestions
and
we'd
asked.
A
B
A
B
Er
yeah
I
think
it's
I
mean
you
know
when,
when
I
on
board
people
and
I've,
probably
on
boarded
more
than
most
more
than
anybody,
probably
in
the
last
two
or
three
years,
I'd
say
but
I
could
be
wrong
about
that.
But
but
people
get
a
very
Trott
centric
view
they
get
a
lot
of
my
opinions
and
stuff
and
having
a
second
person,
there
might
provide
a
more
well-rounded
answer
to
their
questions
and
things
like
that
I
think.
B
A
A
No
ok,
so
we'll
move
on
then
to
on
the
CPC
front,
I
guess
a
couple
things
I
could
mention.
Since
we
don't
have
Matteo,
there
is
discussion
about
the
trial.
Like
there's
an
issue
for
the
tribal
fund
that
was
being
discussed.
There
was
some
concern
about
the
the
budgets
I.
Think
Myles
has
worked
with
Mateo
to
address
that
concern.
We
do
have
on
the
agenda
to
get
a
statement
from
the
board.
A
In
terms
of
you
know,
the
general,
the
general
ask
is
like
confirmation
that
if
we
need
more,
the
budget
will
be
increased,
so
we
hope
to
formalize
an
answer
to
that.
To
address
that
concern.
The
other
one
is
as
part
of
the
discussion
of
that
issue.
There
were
some
some
some
suggestions
that
projects
may
want
to
request
funds
for
particular
events
and
then
manage
the
money
for
those
events
themselves
and
what
was
suggested
and
and
seems
to
be.
Okay.
Nobody's
objected
anyway,
so
far
as
to
try
and
get
the
current
proposal.
A
Pr
landed
so
that
we
have
something
in
place
for
the
travel
fund
and
then,
as
an
extension
PRN
the
ability
for
projects
to
basically
make
that
request.
The
idea
being
the
CPC,
would
you
know
the
the
project
would
say
we're
having
say
a
node
collaborator
summit.
We'd,
like
you
know
this
much
money
to
cover
travel,
CPC
would
say
sure,
and
then
the
project
would
have
their
own
process
for
reviewing
and
approving
those
those
requests.
A
A
A
At
the
open
GS
level,
at
the
collaborator
summit,
there
were
I,
and
this
will
be
like
a
very
Michael
centric
perspective,
they're
a
bunch
of
additional
new
ideas
that
were
proposed
in
terms
of
like.
Should
we
have
you
know
new
ideas
beyond
what
was
we're
captured
in
that
issue?
In
terms
of,
should
there
be
things
like
you
know,
foundation,
wide
bands
or
foundation
wide
moderation?
The
current
proposal
was
very
much.
A
You
know,
projects
do
their
moderation,
but
there
is
an
escalation
path
to
the
to
the
foundation,
but
but
stop
there.
So
a
long
way
of
saying
that,
there's
a
team
being
put
together
to
define
the
scope
of
what
we
need
to
do
on,
you
know
trying
to
land
an
MVP
and
then
starting
the
discussions
on
what
extensions
might
be
worthwhile
useful,
beneficial
across
the
foundation
and
across
the
projects
and
and
what
projects
you
know
that
the
projects
would
think
are
a
good
idea
and
agree
to
and
so
forth.
A
A
We
can
let
our
guests
move
on
and
it's
related
to.
3241
ad
run
kitten
beds.
This
issue
actually
was
closed,
but
there
is
another
issue:
I
think
that
was
pointed
out
which
is
still
open
and
it's
related
to
adding
renkin
embeds
to
the
documentation.
There
was
some
discussion
last
week.
Some
questions
concerns,
so
you
know
we
asked
and
tamal
ski
is
agreed,
and
it's
here
to
you
know,
hopefully
give
us
an
overview
overview
and
answer
some
of
those
questions.
A
D
D
So
this
was
actually
something
that
went
through
the
whole
like
I,
guess,
Tom,
calm,
approval
thing
a
little
while
ago,
and
it
was
as
an
open
flow
request
for
a
while
and
basically
just
waiting
for
us
to
push
some
updates.
They're
actually
gonna
go
in
this
week,
but
the
the
basic
idea
you
know
like
a
year
and
a
half
ago
or
two
or
something
there's
big
kind
of
like
website
redesign
initiative,
and
that
was
broken
up
into
like
smaller
initiatives
and
like
from
the
perspective
of
documentation.
D
One
of
the
things
we
want
to
provide
was
hey.
We're
going
to
be
really
cool
if,
like
all
the
sample
code
and
stuff
actually
ran,
and
not
just
for
like
the
current
Docs,
but
you
could
go
to
any
version
of
node
and
they
all
ran
that
specific
version
and
stuff,
and
so
this
PR
actually
is
kind
of
a
very
small
test
run
specifically
to
be
able
to
test
these
updates
that
we'd
made
specifically
for
node
it
just
it
just
is
one
example
in
the
crypto
library,
and
then
you
know
it's
just
verbatim.
D
The
lis
sample
cause
it's
already.
There
it'll
just
have
a
run
button,
you'll,
be
able
to
run
it
and
like
see
it
actually
take
place
and
then,
based
on
that,
the
idea
was,
we
can
kind
of
start
to
do
more
weather,
more
means
just
enabling
more
sample
code
or
getting
more
creative
with
the
way
it's
presented
or
whatever.
But
the
initial
thing
was
just
to
have
something
kind
of
like
now.
D
The
the
PR
itself
is
is
kind
of
doing
a
little
bit
of
double
duty,
because
I
mean
the
code
had
just
nothing
changed
forever
and
while
I
was
in
there,
I
just
did
some
stuff
like
the
syntax
highlighting
is
not
just
compiled.
So
you
know
if
you
load
the
site
in
with
this
PR
request
committed
like
and
you
have
JavaScript
turned
on,
like
you'll,
actually
get
a
better
experience,
because,
like
the
site
doesn't
actually
need
JavaScript
anymore.
Ironically
enough-
and
you
know,
if
you
have
JavaScript,
ran
off
monkey
just
doesn't
show
up.
D
One
of
the
big
kind
of
impetus
behind
this
is
essentially
a
way
to
get
people
more
involved
earlier
without
having
to
put
in
a
lot
of
personal
effort
and
a
really
good
example
of
that
is.
You
know
whenever
there's
a
nightly
or
whenever
looking
v8
ships
like
a
new
syntax
feature
or
something
the
the
way
to
try.
That
is,
you
have
to
go
download
the
nightly
install
it.
You
know,
nvm
doesn't
support
nightly,
so
it
really
is.
Like
a
you
know,
something
outside
well
the
normal
workflow
that
people
might
have
to
do
you
try
it.
D
You
might
submit
some
bugs,
but
I
think
a
lot
of
people
kind
of
like
don't
end
up
doing
that.
The
place
we
want
to
get
to
eventually
is
when
it'd
be
really
cool.
If
not
only
is
there
a
nightly
kind
of
binary
for
node,
but
there's
nightly
docks
and
if
you
go
to
the
nightly
docks
or
are
running,
the
latest
nightly
know
it,
and
so
you
can
try
all
the
new
syntax
features
or
whatever.
It's
really
easy
to
just
follow
the
bug
right
from
there.
D
So
you
get
people
and
kind
of
able
to
try
all
these
things
without
having
to
put
any
like
a
lot
of
personal
commitment.
So
that's
a
very
brief
summary
of
like
kind
of
both
what
we're
trying
to
ship
right
now,
which
is
again
just
turning
on
that
one
crypto
sample
code
and
the
kind
of
like
longer-term
plan
that
was
discussed
back
in
those
meetings
back
in
the
day.
A
D
D
B
D
A
D
A
D
So
if
you
look
at
the
I
don't
know
the
meeting
notes
like
the
initial
initial
plan
was
like.
Oh
what?
If
we
do
this
like
huge
redesign,
we
have
all
sorts
of
interactive
dogs
and
stuff
and
I
think
I.
Can
you
know
we
can
spin
up
the
there's,
a
repo
that
has
like,
like
the
template
site,
that
used
run
kit
and
stuff
that
just
ran
into
a
bunch
of
like
we
don't
have
any
content
for
this,
so
we
then
fell
back
to
like
well.
D
We
do
have
a
lot
of
content
in
the
API
Docs
and
like
again
from
a
user
perspective,
they're
all
the
same
dogs.
Why
don't?
We
just
kind
of
you
know
put
our
toes
into
the
water
with
this,
as
opposed
to
like
this
weird
chicken
and
egg
problem
we're
like
yeah.
We
want
like
all
this
cool
like
technology,
but
then,
like
you,
know
a
bifurcates
three
ways
into
like.
Do
we
use
what
technology
do
we
use
to
make
the
site
like
react
or
do
whatever?
B
Now
the
the
question,
the
concerns
that
seem
to
come
up
are
privacy
concerns,
and
you
know
like
we
don't
have
Google
Analytics
even
on
the
site,
because
of
because
we
don't
want
to
share
people's
data
and
the
other
one.
Is
you
know
what
will
happen
if
javascript
is
broken
or
we
adding
another?
You
know
what
you
covered
before
you.
B
Are
we
adding
another
dependency
that
might
cause
degradation
for
some
subset
of
users
or
some
users
in
some
conditions
and
I
think
you
know,
I
I
mean
I'm,
I'm,
I
I
haven't
followed
close
to
the
privacy
stuff,
but
but
but
other
than
that,
I'm
pretty
comfortable
with
like
just
throw
this
on
the
website
and
see
what
happens,
and
we
can
always
take
it
out.
It's
been
it's.
It's
been
sitting
there
for
a
year
and
a
half.
Now
since
we
talked
about
it,
and
that
seems
like
a
long
time,
yeah
I've
pasted
the.
A
D
Do
you
want
to
just
go
through
them?
I
mean
the
others.
There
I'm
sorry
I'm
just
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
get
the
chat
back
open
and
closed
it
now
so
yeah.
So
the
tracking
and
reader,
the
tracking
stuff
again
like
I
I,
would
like
to
in
the
bug
or
sorry
request
when
we
shipped
this
thing
in
a
couple
days,
just
direct
you
guys
to
it.
Everyone
can
just
go
and
check
their
cookies
before
and
after
and
like
it
should
be
completely
tracker.
Less
I.
D
Guess,
I
don't
know
how
to
answer
the
redirecting
and
do
we
want
to
warn
I
guess
I
mean
it'll
just
skip
the
last
one
and
I
think
that
the
middle,
these
middle
two
will
be
more
straightforward.
Not
yes
or
no,
really
I
can
just
answer
like
yeah.
We
want
track,
but
from
the
make
optional
thing
like
I
guess,
I,
don't
know
like
there's
no
like
site-wide
preferences
that
introduced
a
cookie
like
from
the
perspective
of
the
user.
D
It's
like
the
exact
same
code
snippet
except
under
there's
now
like
a
run
button
so
like
I,
don't
feel
again.
I
I
wholly
admit
that
I
am
biased
or
whatever,
but
like
one
of
the
big
things.
We're
trying
to
do
with
a
site
is
like
make
javis
like
deliver
on
the
client-side
progress
of
JavaScript
on
the
server
right.
What
why
was
where
I
was
JavaScript
like
one
of
the
big
first
languages
for
most
people,
because
you
can
just
drag
a
file
into
the
browser
and
it
just
works.
D
You
can
download
anything,
you
don't
need
a
compiler
or
whatever,
and
we
kind
of
want
to
deliver
that
same
experience.
For,
like
you
know,
kids,
who,
like
hit
nodejs
dark
for
the
first
time
from
their
Chromebooks
in
school,
just
hit,
run,
write
like
and
I
think
that
the
idea
is
to
like
have
a
pretty
big
separation
between
like
a
bunch
of
other
languages,
that
just
can't
do
that
and
node.
So
I
mean
from
that
perspective.
C
B
C
C
B
C
C
D
One
of
the
so
that
one
of
the
features
of
ranked
it
is
that
there
you
know,
unlike
you,
know,
other
things,
it's
not
like
you
typed
the
code.
You
get
some
hash.
You
then
put
the
hash
link
in
there
rank
it.
Just
it
does
just
take
the
code
from
the
page
and
as
such,
like
you
know,
the
code
lives
in
your
repo
there's
no
syncing
to
do
yeah
exactly
we
can
I
guess
just
face
64
the
code
and
passing
a
query
parameter,
but
I
mean
to
me
I
guess.
D
The
issue
for
me
is
like
from
just
a
usability
perspective.
If
I'm
reading
through
the
docs
and
like,
for
example,
the
crypto
library
where
there's
ten
examples,
I'm
just
gonna
want
to
get
run
and
see
what
happens
and
then
scroll
down,
I,
don't
think
I'm
gonna
want
to
open
ten
tabs
and
go
there
and
then
come
back
and
that
sort
of
thing
I
mean
so
so
to
answer
a
question
that
is
completely
feasible
and
doable
and
it
would
be
easy
I,
don't
even
think
it
would
necessarily
require.
D
C
But
okay,
that's
valid,
but
but
as
what
about
what
about
as
a
stepping
stone
right
like
since
we
have
these
privacy
concerns,
you
know
you
pop.
You
know
broadcasting
information,
that's
already
public
is
not
a
problem
right
and
then
and
then
you
know
it
does
go
to
your
website
and
then
eventually
we
may
warm
to
the
idea
of
running
this
embedded
rather
than
going
to
an
external
website,
but
it
could
this
not
be
an
in-between
step
or
is
it
not
worth?
Is
it
not
I.
A
A
Does
that
I'm
wondering
more
like
if
it's
around
awareness
that
you
know,
one
of
the
potential
concern
is
okay,
you're,
now
running
code
that
didn't
come
from
the
no
js'
project,
it's
coming
from
somewhere
else
and
and
I
I
know
that
that's
actually
kind
of
a
common
thing
you
see
in
other
places
we're
even
like
on
some
sites
when
you
click
on
a
link,
that's
going
exciting
outside
the
site.
It
gives
you
a
warning
and
says:
yeah,
hey,
you're,
leaving
the
site
just
be
aware.
This
is
no
longer
the
note
site.
A
This
is
now
the
blah
blah
site
right
so
that
the
users
know
that
they
were
interacting
with
somewhere
else.
I
I
don't
know
if
it's
feasible
at
all
that,
like
the
first
time,
you
click
on
one
of
the
two
things
you
want
to
run
it
just
pops
up
a
little
thing
that
says:
hey,
you
know
if
you
want
to
run
these
lives.
You
know
this
is
gonna.
This
is
provided
through
blah
blah
blah.
Therefore,
you
know
be
aware:
it's
you
know
it's
outside
the
scope,
know
just
project
or
whatever
disclaimer
we
wanted.
You
said.
A
B
C
A
D
I
feel
like
a
lot
of
this
stuff
is
like
trading.
You
know,
I,
don't
know
what
their
concerns
are,
but
like,
for
example,
do
you
like
link
out
of
the
site
and
not
put
the
embed
at
all,
feels
a
lot
more
like
an
advertisement
to
Runk
it?
For
me,
it's
like
and
it's
a
call
to
action
to
leap
rank
it
as
opposed
to
like
saying.
A
B
Of
me,
I
mean
I.
Don't
want
to
be
cavalier
about
this,
but
part
of
me
feels
like
you
know,
if
you're
concerned
about
running
code
for
running
JavaScript
from
a
different
domain,
then,
though,
than
the
one
that
you're
going
to
I
mean
I
mean
I,
mean
I,
don't
know,
I
mean
I,
guess
I
guess
it
depends.
Like
you
know,
every
set
is
gonna,
be
down.
You
know
every
site
on
the
Internet's
going
to
be
downloading
JavaScript
from
CD
ends
and
stuff.
Like
that,
I
mean
or
is
this
or
is
this
or
is
this
this?
B
D
I'm
not
sure
there
seem
to
be
two
different
issues.
One
is
like
there's
a
script
tag
to
just
bootstrap
the
little
thing
that
in
the
input
that
puts
an
iframe
in
there,
the
code
that
runs
there
I
think
should
be
supremely
not
an
issue
because,
like
the
whole
point
is
yeah,
you
spin
up
a
container.
You
run
the
code
somewhere
else
or
like
that.
That
seems
like
less
troublesome
than
like
code
that
runs
in
the
client
unless
I'm
misunderstanding
like
it
runs
real
note
right.
D
A
And
then
I
guess
the
only
like
I'm.
Just
thinking
of
you
know
potential
is
we
don't
have
everybody
what
people
could
be
concerned
about
like
if
I
type
in
something
and
I
think
that,
like
the
only
you
know,
the
the
site
that
seemed
that
code
is
the
node
somehow
related
to
node?
My
code
has
actually
run
somewhere
else
right
so
like.
If,
if
you
to
scrape
in
and
keep
keep
track
of
all
the
code
that
people
write
in
those
little
boxes,
you
could
write.
I
mean.
D
A
C
D
C
So,
okay,
so
then,
so
then
I
think
I
think
you
know
in
terms
of
in
terms
of
pasting,
inadvertently
pasting
in
sensitive
data
into
this
playground
in
which
you
are
now
I,
think
maybe
what
we
need
to
what?
What
in?
What
we
need
to
make
clear
is
that
if
you
make
any
modifications
to
the
code
which
you
have
now
imported
into
this
playground,
this
is
no
longer
the
nodejs
code
and
that
needs
to
become
clear
like
as
soon
as
the
if
your
backspace
out,
even
one
character.
That's
it.
C
D
C
C
D
B
D
C
E
E
Wanna
say
that
I
appreciate
that
were
being
cautious,
but
that
I
don't
yeah
I.
Don't
think
that
particular
I,
don't
think
anybody's
gonna
be
confused
about
that
and
again
cuz
I,
don't
know
if
you've
actually
used
an
interface
like
this
Gabriel.
But
it's
not.
It
doesn't
stick
around
very
long.
Yeah
like
you
can
twiddle
around
with
the
code
and
change
it
a
bit
and
see
how
it
works.
When
you
change
it.
C
E
B
Run
kit
and
that's
what
you
kind
of
want
to
avoid,
but
I
wonder
people
I
wonder
if
people
might
be
more
comfortable
with
just
you
know
under
each
under
sample
code,
just
being
a
tiny,
you
know
visible,
but
not
particularly,
you
know,
you
know
glaring
button
that
says
trying
one
kid
and
then
it
opens
that.
But
like
then
we're
back
at
the
base64
in
the
code
or
whatever.
D
A
D
F
D
So
the
Express
one
it's
kind
of
cool
because
it
uses
the
the
endpoint
version
of
this
so
like
it
actually
spins
up
a
server
that
the
user
can
hit.
So,
unlike
basically,
rohnke
has
two
modes
like
rebel
mode,
where
you
type
I,
plus
five
and
you
get
ten,
and
then
it
had
server
mode.
We're
like
the
second.
You
hit
the
site.
It's
actually
spinning
up
the
server
that
and
anyone
can
hit
so
like
their
hello
world
is
actually
like.
You
can
hit
it
from
your
phone
as
you're
editing
it
on
the
site,
a.
D
A
D
It
will
be
the
case
when
about
two
days
again,
we
have
like
a
really
weird
legacy:
stupid
cookie
that
we
used
to
use
to
save
the
accounts.
We
disable
that
feature
two
years
ago
and
then
just
forgot
to
tear
the
cookie,
but
as
part
of
this
update
that
will,
that
will
definitely
be
true
and
when
it
goes,
live,
I
will
post
on
their
steps
to
be
able
to
confirm
this
stuff,
because
I'm
sure
you'll
get
questions
about
it.
So
they
want
to
have
a
really
good
reference
to
me.
One
point:
people
do
in.
A
A
I'm
just
trying
to
like
try
and
capture
in
terms
of
like
if
it's
just
what
the
interaction
is
cuz
that
clarifies
a
little
bit
in
terms
of
what
might
be
happening.
It's
not
that
we're
running
we're,
not
we're
not
like
taking
some
code
that
that,
like
you,
said
that
comes
from
the
run
during
the
run
good
website
and
executing
it,
it's
just
that
there'll
be
a
WebSocket
connection
made
and
then
the
code
will
be
we'll
shoot
over
get
executed.
The
results
come
back
and
that
just
repeats
in
terms
of
you
know
you.
D
Have
to
explicitly
hit
run
I'm,
not
sure
if
I
necessarily
understood
question
but
yeah
like
there's
not
like
some
sort
of
auto
saving
or
auto,
sending
back
and
forth
or
like
auto,
calculating
kind
of
like
the
browser
rebels
are
doing
now.
We're
like
I,
like
it
dimly,
says
I
know.
What's
going
on,
I
do
want
to
have
I,
do
want
to
specify.
D
Just
because
I'm
reading
the
chat
as
this
is
happening,
do
you
like
two-step
process
and
again
I'm
fine
doing
that
it's
a
little
bit
more
work,
but
we
can
do
it
we'll
be
changing
on
lodash
and
round
out
that
that's
actually
currently,
because
honestly
ever
tried
to
load
any
sort
of
embed
into
a
web
site.
30
times
like
your
browser,
will
call
to
its
knees
and
impress
the
the
actual
thing
that
this
update
was
for
was
to
fix
that
specific
feature
so
that
sites
like
lodash
can
just
have
all
this
stuff
loaded
from
the
beginning.
D
Go
into
detail
it's
technically
interesting,
but
basically,
even
though
there
are
30
iframes,
none
of
them
are
alive.
There's
just
one
manager
iframe
that
draws
into
all
them
so
the
end.
So
the
memory
issue
has
gone
away
until
the
reason
Express
has
it
immediately
when
you
load
and
load
ash
dozen
is
because
lodash
wants
30
and
that
will
become
available
in
like
the
week.
D
E
Just
just
for
my
mighty
sense
on
this
is
I
I
don't
have
a
product
I.
It
seems
that
lots
of
Doc's
had
a
runnable
version.
Runnable
examples.
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
adding
that
to
notes.
Doc's
I
only
have
two
concerns
about
of
one
of
which
is
that
I
is
it
is
the
docs
are
static,
remains
statically
browsable,
but
that's
already
being
dressed.
If
the,
if
it's
not
available,
it'll
gracefully
down
grow
downgrade
till
you
just
see
the
example
is
that
am
I
right
there?
Yes,.
D
E
So
that's
nice,
I
I
don't
know
if
this
is
might
be
tangential
to
this
conversation,
so
I
don't
want
to
barge
it
down,
but
I
I
do
not
believe
I
believe
that
the
we
have
two
things
being
pushed
currently,
one
of
which
is
runnable
examples.
So
whether
or
not
they
actually
run
with
run
kit
or
not
each
example
being
standalone
cut
and
paste,
you
can
run
it
whatever.
E
B
I
didn't
catch
that
if
someone
can
summarize
in
the
chat
for
me,
I
didn't
cat
that
I
didn't
I
got
some
garble
going
on
and
I
didn't,
hear
everything,
but
I
kind
of
want
to
know
what
the
two
trains
are
running
into
each
other.
Are
someone
can
summarize
that
in
the
chat
for
me,
I'd
appreciate
it,
but
I
don't
want
to
hold
up
the
conversation.
So
I'll
stop
talking
now.
I.
D
A
E
E
D
D
B
Where
I
we're
way
over
time
on
this
topic,
which
is
not
to
say
that
we
have
to
stop
talking
about
if
it's
important
and
whatnot,
but
if
we're,
if
we're,
if
we
feel
like
we've
gotten
what
we
need
out
of
it,
we
should
probably
move
on
to
other
things,
especially
because
we
still
the
private
segments
yeah.
Does
anybody
have
any.