►
Description
A
A
D
C
D
A
E
Didn't
edit,
but
I
can
say,
but
about
it
it's.
The
original
issue
was
a
concern
about
code,
duplication
that
it's
essentially
copying
an
MLA
example
from
the
cryptic
API,
and
so
that's
what
the
discussion
was
originally
about.
So
a
couple
of
people
approved
it
and
someone
objected
to
it
and
I
just
request
the
changes
myself,
because
I
noticed
a
couple
of
technical
issues
with
it.
I
don't
think
this
example
should
land
as
it
is,
whether
it's
duplicating
code
or
not.
It's
it's
not
a
good
example
for
this
API.
E
D
D
B
D
B
A
A
G
That
works
I
can,
and
that
probably
is
deeply
linked
with
the
next
item,
which
is
a
issue
8
or
7
on
GTAC
repo.
So,
first
of
all,
thanks
a
lot
for
having
me
today,
I'm
sorry,
it
is
not
brilliant
that
I
did
not
prepare.
My
baby
stressed
out.
I
guess
I
was
invited
to
help
you
get
a
better
status
on
what's
happening
with
three
three
people
request
is:
is
that
correct.
G
So
I
will
try
to
be
brief.
There
are
currently
three
pull
requests.
One
of
them
are
thought
by
Stefan
and
made
material
that
exposed
the
current
asynchronous
resource
and
there
are
two
other
pull
requests
that
implements
higher
level
API
that
aims
at
providing
local
storage
through
this
year,
even
troop
to
user.
G
There
is
one
I
you
thought
in
in
March
last
year
that
do
not
rely
on
the
first
pull
requests,
because
bags
and
esprit
quest
was
closed,
moving
any
more,
and
there
is
one
open
by
Andre
in
December
that
relies
totally
on
the
first
pull
requests
mentioned.
So
that's
one
of
the
first
difference
between
these
two
pull
requests.
As
of
today,
the
original
Pro
request
execution,
a
synchronous
resource
is,
is
blocked
by
a
few
commands
and
the
potential
introducing
a
potential
memory
leak
on
here
and
the
API
is
a
table
built
over
it.
G
So
right
now,
I,
don't
think
current
exact
recess
is
manageable,
but
I
am
Not
sure,
because
it's
some
internals
I'm
not
fully
understanding
how
hard
it
is
to
fix
these
issues.
Regarding
the
difference
between
the
two
high
level
Piazza,
there
is
not
a
lot
of
differences
anymore.
There
won't
be
a
lot
of
them
after
the
rebirth
of
my
Pia
or
my
code.
G
Another
main
difference
is
that
the
address
PR
links
the
content
of
the
store
with
the
propagation
mechanism.
For
instance,
propagation
of
the
store
will
be
enabled
when
you
start
to
set
something
in
the
store,
and
if
you
don't
set
anything,
the
store
is
not
propagated.
I
personally,
don't
think
that
system
holding
holding
something
ordinary
should
be
impacted
on
who
the
payload
exists.
If
the
payload
exists
and
I've
got
methods
that
stop
initial
stop
Aisha
and
say
it's
a
payload
of
the
star
request
is
the
event
loop
and
the
other
major
difference
is
a
vehicle
difference.
G
We
have
a
width
and
Ray
is
about
safety
and
rays.
Api
is
low
level
and
does
not
provide
scoping.
So
it
has
the
same
issue.
The
same
Serena's
issue,
a
train
to
be
neutral.
The
same
impact
as
domain
had
meaning
that
when
you
start
to
be,
you
can
get
really
synchronously
an
inline
II
into
a
context
where
the
star
will
be
available
and
I.
Don't
know.
G
If
you
remember
in
the
domain
postmortem
one
of
the
issues
that
you
could
call
ran
and
every
line
of
code,
every
line
of
code
running
after
rel,
not
in
the
callback,
will
be
in
the
era
management
context
of
domain
that
something
that
was
really
our
prana
and
I.
Don't
wrote
in
my
TR
to
expose
such
API
isn't
that
why
the
entry
points
take
a
callback
and
the
stories
also
only
available
within
that
core
back
and
last
but
not
least
in
address
PR.
G
In
my
case,
there
is
no
way
to
fully
disabled
instance,
because
I
don't
want
to
introduce
and
safe
mechanism
where,
when
you
call
a
method,
you
don't
know
if
it
will
return
and
define
anything
else
all
for
an
exception.
As
that
as
pretty
much
any
picture,
I
tried
to
be
neutral
and
not
to
to
show
too
much
of
my
opinions.
But
if
I
did
is
forgive
me.
C
G
Move
forward
on
that
and
I
introduced
to
another
method
named
Renan
returns
that
friends
occur
back
synchronously
after
iteration
with
Alana.
We
made
very
good
case
about
it,
so
the
main
difference
is
more
about
scoping.
What
has
access
to
the
icing
store
or
leaving
it
pretty
open?
For
instance,
I've
got
an
example
that
if
you've
got
three
even
Christner
on
the
same
event,
emitter,
let's
say
that
the
first
event
listener
said
something
into
star.
You
know
in
Android,
Pai
nursing,
kakatiya
said
something
in
the
strong
Interscope.
G
The
thurmond
I
think
listener
will
have
access
to
it
when
maybe
the
soonest
accessed
is
not
can
remove
what's
inside
and
the
third
will
have
access
or
not
access
based
on
what
user
this
northern.
In
my
case,
the
scope
is
only
available
through
a
function
also
a
synchronous
test
created
within
this
callback
function,
meaning
that
you
don't
have
this
weird
state
where
you
don't
know
if
you
are
wheezing
escape
outside
of
a
scope.
C
What
our
question
is:
is
there
anything
in
particular,
you
think
the
TSE
could
do
to
move
this
forward,
because
I
think
many
of
us
are
looking
at
this
thinking.
We'd
like
to
see
a
CLS
but
I,
don't
know
the
TSE
is
gonna,
be,
like
you
know,
come
saying:
okay,
we're
gonna!
Go
this
way.
We've
decided
like
it's
you
you
guys.
Obviously
you
know
way
more
than
us
about
this.
G
Having
the
fattest
distribution
is
that
there
is
no,
which
we
tried,
multiple
time
to
discuss
with
Andre,
but
the
distinction
about
safe,
Oliver
and
Oliver
present
and
right
now
we
are
trapped
because
we
we
don't
want
two
or
three.
Nobody
wants
to
Authority,
take
a
decision
or
nobody
has
the
legitimacy
to
to
take
a
decision
so,
for
instance,
the
true-true
chaos
a
block.
G
My
technical
issue,
my
dear
please
block,
because
it
has
been
received,
advice
that
there
should
be
trade
between
the
two
approaches,
but
I'm
very
sad
to
announce
that
I
don't
have
a
good
solution
right
now,
my
main
yet,
but
totally
selfish
feeling
would
be
that
email
might
clever.
That
would
be
unfair
to
to
take
a
decision
based
on
a
single
statement.
C
Okay,
one
other
question
and
I'm:
maybe
it's
not
fair
to
ask
you
this
letter
I'll,
ask
anyhow
so
there's
two
PRS
and
it
sounds
kind
of
like
what's
it
makes
it
sound
kind
of
balanced,
like
you
know,
there's
this
one
PR
and
then
there's
another
PR
and
this
to
people
who
don't
quite
can't
agree
on
it
some
of
these
details,
but
is
it
really
is
it
really
to
like
do?
Is
there
a
larger
group?
Is
it
like?
C
G
G
G
Tracking
I
worked
a
desire
to
have
as
much
as
possible
standard
way
in
no
js',
because
I
want
us
to
I
would
like
us
to
unify
the
ecosystem
around
it
and
to
prevent
Haskell's
such
as
the
CLS
who
could
cooked
breaking
the
regular
CLS
because
of
it.
Otherwise
what
it
contains.
That's
my
main
rationale.
Why
I
want
to
hire
you
Luther
API
and
that's
I,
think
what
what
made
sense
to
wasted?
And
if
you
feedback
a
collective
but
I
can't
show
proof
for
them.
G
G
The
good
thing
is
still
that
it
will
be
experimental
whatever
here
we
go
with,
it
would
be
experimental
for
a
few
months
yeah,
so
we
can
iterate
upon
it.
It
will
enable
us
to
to
iterate
as
much
as
we
want
and
I
think
cooks,
because
they
will
new
higher
level
epi,
that
people
can
use
to
kill
99%
of
the
usage
of
asking
cook,
and
if
we
don't
break
this
I
know
no
API
after
it's
considered
a
stable.
Of
course,
we
will
be
able
to
eat
it
and
change
the
internals.
B
G
B
G
G
Passing
an
API
is
that
promotes
best
practice
for
a
rural
management,
meaning
having
a
real
scope
to
know
what
will
be
covered
if
people
read
the
raw
management
versus
API
might
be
the
way
out
of
domain,
maybe
not
for
the
node
Eric
here,
but
at
least
for
our
customers,
who
rely
on
customer
Surya.
Use
of
habit
for
well
usual
will
rely
on
domain
for
error
management
and
will
create
a
new
instance
of
domain
at
each
HTTP
request.
We
can
help
them
get
out
of
it
with
the
not
too
much
change
in
the
acabelles.
D
D
Republic's
is
done
with
other
large
things,
and
while
we
work
out
all
the
details
and
then
and
get
an
implementation
going,
III
know
that
you
know
I
I've
got
it
in
my
queue
to
really
start
digging
in
it's
the
it's
a
massive,
complicated
threat
of
discussion,
so
it's
hard
to
kind
of
catch
back
up
to
date.
When
were
things
are
at
and
it's
not
a
it's,
not
a
trivial
piece
of
functionality,
so
I
would
just
say
that
definitely
interested
it's
just
gonna
take
a
little
bit
time
to
dig
through
well.
C
Think
I
think
we
I
think
what
might
unblock
it.
Unfortunately,
even
though
it's
hard
is
to
is
to
broaden
the
conversation
like,
the
people
are
already
involved,
are
bumping
heads
and
they're
the
ones
who
know
it
most
deeply.
It's
it's
a
little
bit
it's
hard.
What
I,
what
I
would
want?
I,
don't
know
if
this
is
possible.
C
Being
in
like
a
list
of
high-impact
projects
that
are
interested
in
this
functionality
and
which
of
the
options
are,
would
they
take
like
if
it
were,
if
they
existed
and
B
existed,
would
they
rather
use
a
or
rather
use
B,
or
will
they
use?
Neither
the
one
thing
about
kind
of
if
we're
forced
to
vote
or
something
like
that,
I
would
should
be
pretty
terrible.
G
Trusts
if
Stephan
enemy,
because
we
think
twas
the
same
approach
and
my
PR-
is
actually
much
closer
to
forests,
another's
work
because
I
that
was
wonderful,
although
well
enough.
My
design
goal
was
to
make
an
API
that
looks
like
what
people
had
been
using
for
the
last
seven
years
for
that
purpose,
because
I
don't
want
to
bring
your
brand-new
API
with
new
concepts
that
nobody
has
ever
handled.
G
Regarding
your
reaching
out
to
projects,
I've
been
trained
to
do
that
for
the
past
year,
when
the
pier
was
told
to
see
if
I
could
find
any
support
in
one
direction
of
the
user
to
to
move
forward,
and
this
has
been
incredibly
complicated.
I've
got
like
probably
20
to
30
people
who
told
me
physically.
Yes
in
my
company,
my
bank,
in
my
newsroom
in
my
ex
company.
We
would
like
to
have
that,
but
I
haven't
found
any
open
source
project
except
API
that
aims
at
providing
serious
capabilities.
Who
could
be
interested
in
that.
C
Electing
to
make
a
call
and
I,
but
I
have
to
say
that
something
that
looks
like
CLS
and
brings
it
into
node
core,
where
we
can
make
sure
that
the
ecosystem
works.
Well,
as
the
CLS
sounds
I
mean,
it
sounds
very
compelling
to
me.
I
know:
there's
a
lot
of
other
projects
that
are
using
CLS
to
get
their
continuation
tracking
vision.
So,
and
you
know
anything
we
could
do.
That
would
make
that
thing.
G
G
D
G
Let's
say
that
I
think
you're
reaching
out
to
the
ecosystem
is
incredibly
hard.
I
can
try
to
tree
don
t
find
a
few
people,
but
I
always
do
that
on
a
1:1
basis.
That's
pretty
much!
It's
pretty
much,
taking
a
lot
of
time
to
come
back
you
a
world
of
descriptions
and
calls
of
those
arrests
few
weeks
to
try
to
invest
more
deeper
into
that
I.
A
A
And
okay,
so
I
think
that's
kind
of
covered
the
next
two
items
on
the
agenda,
so
that
was
just
one
more
Nino
GST
SC
repo,
which
was
the
no
GS
future
directions.
Any
interest
online
or
in
person
I.
Think
Michael
raced
this
Michael's
on
vacation
at
the
moment,
so
I'm
not
sure.
If
there's
anything
in
particular
to
discuss
on
this
today
or
it's
just
socializing.
B
A
A
B
B
C
A
Okay,
it
sounds
like
there's
nothing
time-sensitive
again
on
the
TSC
for
that
particular
item.
I
will
leave
it
on
the
agenda
for
next
week,
because
Michael
may
have
some
more
background
being
on
both
committees
as
what
she
said
say:
okay,
that's
everything
on
the
agenda
for
today.
Is
there
anything
else
anyone
wants
to
mention
or
call
out
on
the
public
sectional.
A
J
H
A
D
D
The
main
motivation
for
these
is
you
know
our
code
base
is
getting
larger
if
we
can
remove
things-
and
we
probably
should
look
to
do
so,
it
doesn't
I'm.
Gonna
have
a
huge
impact,
but
it
just
eliminates
some
corrupt
maintenance.
Cost
is
just
that
right.
It's
it's!
It's
additional
cruft
in
size
and
bulk,
and
you
know
that
kind
of
a
you
know.
Yes,
there's
always
a
nonzero
chance
that
removing
something
that's
been
there
could
break
somebody,
but
these
things
have
been
deprecated
for
a
very
long
time.
B
And
I'd
add
that
these
are
these
are
PRS.
I
think
that
that
almost
everybody
here
should
probably
have
an
opinion
on
at
least
one
of
them.
There's
like
four
of
them.
I
think
that
Betty,
open
and
they're
on
the
change
and
there's
these
are
ones
that
everyone
here
should
have
near
their
one
of
your
chef's,
an
opinion
on
I,
think
and
and
I
I
kind
of
wonder
if
he,
if
the
the
lack
of
activity
on
these
things
means
that
a
lot
of
people
are
either
plus
zero.
B
You
know
like
yeah,
I'm,
fine,
if
it
happens,
but
I
really
don't
feel
strongly
enough
about
it
to
endorse
it
or
the
other
way.
Minus
zero,
which
is
kind
of
where
I
am
where
I'm,
just
like
I
guess
I
prefer
that
these
that
these
just
remain.
But
you
know
I'm,
not
gonna,
not
gonna,
fight
about
it.
You
know
kind
of
thing,
so
it
would
be
great
to
just
have
more
more
inter
participation
and
these
things,
even
if
your
feelings
are
even
if
it's
just
a
comment
that
you
don't
have
strong
feelings.
J
C
C
Mean
it's
hard
to
know:
I'm
not
going
to
exaggerate
the
difficulty
of
maintaining
a
couple.
Deprecated
API
is,
but
we
do
bump
into
them.
I
fix
test
to
fail
because
of
them.
I've
had
I've
had
to
kind
of
readjust
messages
and
make
things
work,
and
they
there
is
some
maintenance
cost
of
it
when,
when
you're
in
the
process
of
doing
it,
it's
I've
definitely
had
the
you
know.
C
C
B
A
D
J
So
I
think
the
only
person
involved
from
the
TSP
besides
me
and
James
Holloway
commented
on
the
TR
so
just
for
context,
a
a
new
person
on
the
scene
and
he
affirms
that
James
and
I
worked
on
Connor
spoken.
The
PRS
like
not
too
complex,
first
contribution,
basically
that
their
North
House
didn't
feel
was
obsessed
approach
to
to
solving
that
particular
issue.
And
so
he
of
a
separate
second
PR
that
he
would
have
referred
and
and
will
chase
blended,
see
the
original
CR
from
Connor,
while
the
other
PL
was
Philippine,
yeah
and
I.
J
B
A
J
J
J
A
Okay,
it
sounds
like
in
future.
We
might
want
to
maybe
drop
some
wording
around
this
see
if
they
how
we
handle,
when
they're
watching
very
similar
pr's
and
what
we
actually
want
to
have
some
kind
of
longer
baking
time
for
tea.
Piazza,
open,
I,
don't
know
if
we
want
to
go
down
that
route,
but
it
sounds
like
something
to
bear
in
mind
and
maybe
consider
writing
in
even
reviewing
pool
request
parts
to
collaborate
to
college.
Something
like
that.
J
D
D
What
not
standing
to
do
that
I've
had
since
interactive
you
haven't
been
able
get
back
to
it
is
I
mean
to
have
a
call,
basically,
where
I
want
to
walk
people.
You
know
anyone
who's
interested
through
the
PR,
since
it
is
so
massive
just
get
books
on
background
on
how
to
work
where
to
start
actually
doing
a
review.