►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
B
A
A
A
B
A
It
stands
one
nation,
under
god,
indivisible
with
liberty
and
justice
for
all
all
right
all
right,
so
we
need
approval
of
the
minutes.
We
need
a
motion
move
by
commissioner
cavell
second
by
commissioner
wiper,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
aye,
aye
opposed
eyes.
Have
it
all
right
now
we
need
approval
of
the
agenda.
A
A
All
right
motion
carries
thank
you
and
you
hear
five
years
because
commissioner
spitz
is
on,
but
he's
unable
to
vote
correct.
He
understands
that
just
so
everybody
knows
so
now
we
have
the.
The
next
item
is
public
comment:
anybody
from
the
public
looking
to
speak,
anyone
from
the
public
looking
to
speak,
commissioner
cabell.
E
A
Well,
commissioner,
cabell,
can
we
leave
that
until
the
end?
Okay,
just
as
we
get
to
agenda?
Thank
you.
A
No
worries
norris.
All
right
next
is
communications.
We
have
one
communication,
it's
the
cip
status
department,
facility
planning
and
engineering
presenter
is
edward
josh
action
required
to
receive
and
file.
Is
there
any?
We
need
a
motion?
A
F
A
Motion
carries
thank
you.
Now
we
have
the
consent
agenda.
We
have
two
items
on
the
consent
agenda,
which
is
the
resolution
fiscal
year,
2022
appropriation
with
the
city
of
southfield
for
tri-county
road
improvement,
project
number
55251,
and
then
we
have
resolution
fiscal
year,
2022
appropriation
with
the
city
of
auburn
hills
for
a
tri-county
road
improvement
program,
project
number
56431,.
A
So
we
move
it
first
right.
We
me
I'll
move
it
move
by
commissioner,
charles
seconded
by
commissioner
wiper
and
discussion.
Commissioner,
charles.
F
Thank
you.
I
was
reviewing
this
and
it
looks
like
pretty
boiler
plate,
but
there
was
one
distinction
that
I
noticed
between
the
salford
and
the
rochester,
and
I
was
like,
let's
let's
talk
about
that.
So
if
you
look
at
the
salfield
draft
resolution,
it
says
the
one
two
three
four
five,
whereas
is
in.
If
you
compare
the
five
whereases
to
the
rochester,
that
fifth
one
isn't
there,
and
I
just
wanna
know
why
that
is.
A
So
you're
talking
about
is
it
the
language
there
just
there's
just
a
different
there's:
less
whereases.
It's.
F
A
Let
me
I'll
grab
that
real,
quick,
let's
see
so,
it
looks
like
that.
The
project
in
south
field
is
probably
going
to
go
longer
than
the
potentially
longer
than
the
one
in
auburn
hills.
So
that's
why
I
believe
the
potential
saying
that,
in
the
event
that
it
goes
to
2023
and
the
program's
not
available
okay,
so
it's
probably
a
bigger
project
is
what
I
can
see
right
up
just
first
hand
out
right
off,
okay
and
if
anybody
else
has
any
input
on
that,
but
that's
the
first
first
I
see.
F
Perhaps
I
know
we've
approved
the
agenda,
but
can
it
scoot
to
the
end
and
if
there's
some
staff
who
could
speak
to
that
before
I
vote.
A
Okay,
okay,
so
we'll
so
the
the
motion
on
the
floor
is
to
move
the
consent
agenda
items
to
the
regular
agenda
at
the
end
of
the
regular
agenda.
So
add
a
c
and
d.
So
it's
been
moved
by
commissioner
charles
seconded
by
commissioner
cavall
call
the
vote.
Please.
F
F
B
A
All
right,
thank
you.
Motion
carry
so
we'll
add
two
agenda
items
so
now
that
now
we'll
move
to
the
regular
agenda.
The
first
regular
agenda
is
a
brownfield
plan.
2022-92.
A
I
I
The
resulting
operation
from
historic
use
is
a
huge,
gravel
pit
and
pretty
much
the
middle
of
the
site
that
is
currently
filled
with
water
and
there's
significant
mining
overburden
on
the
site
from
the
actual
hole
that
was
dug.
This.
This
property
will
become
eligible
as
a
brownfield
as
its
inclusion
in
the
state
land
bank
authority
as
a
land
bank
property,
it's
automatically
eligible
as
a
brownfield
property
for
all
eligible
activities
outlined
in
the
public
act
of
381
of
1996..
I
I
The
brownfield
plan
identifies
19.2
million
dollars
in
eligible
activities.
However,
with
that
said,
commerce
township
has
put
a
limit
of
20
years
or
up
to
18
million
dollars,
whichever
comes
first
to
the
development
for
the
brownfield
plan.
So
with
those
numbers
in
mind,
the
brownfield
plan
has
is
outlined,
as
it
is
capped
at
the
20
years
in
those
20
years
you
can.
I
The
development
team
is
estimated
to
receive
back
and
reimburse
10.8
million
so
significantly
less
than
the
18
or
19.2
that
they
are
eligible
to
receive
through
brownfield
tax,
increment
finance,
the
state,
because
it's
a
state
land
bank
property,
the
state
land
bank
has
a
funding
mechanism
called
the
550
rule,
and
what
that
is
is
for
the
first
five
years
as
after
the
property
is
transferred
back
to
the
re
development
team.
The
state
land
bank
is
eligible
to
capture
50
of
the
taxes
generated
on
site.
So
that's
for
five
years.
I
With
that
said,
our
our
administration
team
worked
with
the
state
land
bank
to
identify
four
hundred
thousand
dollars
for
to
be
awarded
to
oakland
for
affordable
and
obtainable
housing
for
the
county
out
of
that
money.
That
would
be
captured
for
that
for
that
use
for
the
state
land
bank.
So
that's
a
win
to
help
affordable
table
housing
using
partnership
with
the
state
land
bank
authority.
I
Commerce,
township
is
also
waiving
some
tapping
fees
for
both
water
and
sanitary
they're
they're,
waiving
the
full
two
thousand
dollars
for
water
and
half
of
the
sanitary
fee,
roughly
about
nine
hundred
thousand
dollars,
they're
waving
in
fees
for
the
project,
commerce
township,
obviously
is
really
enthusiastic
to
get
this
project
approved,
there's
actually
three
gravel
pits
next
to
each
other.
This
is
the
most
west,
the
most
west
project
or
property
that
has
a
gravel
pit.
I
I
The
the
actual
tax
increase
for
the
property
it
currently
is
around
hundred
thousand
dollars,
and
it's
going
to
be
once
all
the
houses
are
50,
50
million.
So
it's
a
59.5
million
dollar
increase
in
taxable
value.
It's
also
important
to
point
out
that
state
school
taxes
are
not
being
captured
on
this
project,
so
here
on
valley,
school
is
going
to
benefit
immediately
on
the
taxes
generated
from
these
houses.
I
A
All
right
I
need
to
charlie
commissioner,
I'm
sorry
good.
Thank
you,
chair
you're,.
E
I
There's
there's
affordable
housing
units
out,
I
was
mentioning,
was
with
the
we
worked
with
the
state
land
bank,
and
when
I
say
we,
the
administration
worked
with
the
state
land
bank
authority
to
identify
400
000
that
we
awarded
back
to
oakland
county
to
work
on
affordable
and
table
housing
throughout
oakland
county.
So
we're
going
to
be
working
with
the
state
land
bank
authority,
get
those
monies
and
figure
out
how
exactly
we're
going
to
use
them
to
benefit
such
causes.
E
I
Sure
so
the
state
land
bank,
as
part
of
their
as
this
property
is
gonna,
be
part
of
the
state.
Landing
authority
is
eligible
to
capture
that
550
for
the
first
five
years
after
five
years,
so
that
results
in
about
2.35
million.
I
believe
out
of
that
money,
though
they
have
identified
400
000
to
award
back
to
the
county
for
use
for
affordable
unsaidable
housing
throughout
the
county.
I
We're
working
on
is
when
exactly
it's
going
to
be
we're
hoping
in
the
first
year
or
two.
We
actually
have
a
call
with
the
state
land
bank
a
couple
days
and
well.
I
think
that's
gonna,
be
our
point
of
discussion
as
far
as
when
exactly
we're
gonna
get
the
the
400
000.
E
J
Good
evening,
everybody
good
morning,
andy
miller,
we're
one
of
the
development
partners,
franklin
property
corporation,
there's,
not
a
specific
requirement
to
have
a
union
shop.
However,
the
majority
of
our
infrastructure
contractors
are
all
union
shops
that
are
all
oakland
county
based.
J
Relatively
quickly
we've
been
working
on
it
for
two
and
a
half
years.
We've
we've
gotten
complete
site
plan
approval
through
commerce.
Township
engineering
is
done.
We
would
hope
to
break
ground.
Yet
in
january
february
of
this
forthcoming
year,.
E
I
see
you
I
I
know
that
commissioner
chair
miller
has
talked
with
chair
woodward
and
all
of
us
about
starting
a
work
group
to
understand
how
to
do
brownfields
in
a
more
a
responsible
bidding
way
to
incentivize
or
compel
developers
like
andy
and
gary
to
work
with
union
shops
and
then
also
to
think
about
how
to
set
the
framework
for
incentivizing
a
rewarding
people
for
doing
more
affordable
housing
units,
but
also
making
sure
that
you
don't
lose
your
shirt
on
a
deal
and
then
also
I'm
sure,
gwen
has
questions
about
this.
E
You
know
single
family
detached
homes
are
not
economical
or
environmentally
viable,
so
think
about
those
three
things
ingrid
can
we
have
our
work
group
accomplish
these
kind
of
goals
and
frames
by
the
time?
Andy
and
gary
want
to
break
ground,
or
are
there
other
things
that
have
to
happen
if
a
bra
is
approved
in
january,
for
them
to
be
able
to
meet
their
timeline.
K
So
the
work
group
that
I
know
that
chairman
woodward
is
going
to
set
up
for
your
for
the
board
of
commissioners.
I
know
that's
supposed
to
happen
soon,
however,
though,
the
the
project
right
now
is
going
according
to
what
the
rules
are
in
place
right
now,
so
you
know
they'll
have
to
move
forward
under
that
and
then
any
other
projects
at
once
the
workgroup
comes
up
with
their
framework
and
what
they
would
like
to
incorporate
into
policy
all
projects
coming
in
after
that,
then,
we'll
have
to
abide
by
those
new
policy
requirements.
E
K
J
I'd
like
to
clarify
when
we
said
break
ground
break
ground
is
actually
doing
the
work.
It
would
go
literally
out
to
bid
next
week,
so
we
don't
have
enough
time
to
consider
a
change
in
policy.
Additionally,
this
wasn't
a
requirement
of
going
through
this
process
the
last
couple
years.
So,
although
I
think
it's
a
it's
a
worthy
gesture
or
a
worthy
cause
on
your
part,
I
think
it
should
be
for
subsequent
developments
and
would
would
kill
this
development
if
it
was
imposed
at
this
time.
E
K
So
I
mean
it'll
move
as
fast
as
as
the
commissioners
move,
so
first
chairman
woodward
needs
to
identify
and
set
up
the
task
force,
and
then
you
know
start
working
through
those
conversations.
So
I
you
know
this
is
something
a
little
new
and
recent,
and
so
I
mean
maybe
some
of
your
colleagues
are
able
to
defer
how
other
task
forces
have
gone,
but
yeah
we'll
move
as
quickly
as
the
voc
and
the
task
force
moves.
Okay,.
D
A
D
So
I
am
gonna
jump
on
what
charlie
talked
about
a
little
bit,
but
specifically,
I
want
to
talk
about
affordable
housing.
D
I
am
glad
we're
getting
400
000
from
the
state
land
bank
toward
affordable
housing,
but
that
does
not
solve
the
problem
of
affordable
housing
in
communities
such
as
commerce,
township,
rochester,
hills,
novi
and
others
where
developers
want
to
develop
in
our
communities
right,
you're,
coming
in
you're,
going
to
build
230
homes
and
and
I'm
from
novi,
and
so
I'm
familiar
with
mr
jonas
company
and
and
all
of
that,
but
there
is
no
incentive
to
build
affordable
housing
in
communities
like
where
I
live.
D
D
We
have
a
lot
of
restaurants
that
workforce
needs
housing,
that's
not
1800
a
month,
town
homes
or
45,
450
000
single
family
homes,
and
so,
if
we're
going
to
provide
tax
relief
in
the
form
of
brownfield
credits
to
a
developer
in
a
community
like
this,
I
would
like
somehow
that
discussion
to
push
forward
on
what
are
we
doing
about
affordable
housing,
because
we
keep
talking
about
how
we
need
it,
but
we're
not
talking
about
putting
it
where
it's
really
needed.
D
D
So
I'm
it's
not
gonna.
I'm
gonna
vote
in
in
support
of
the
proposal,
because
they've
done
all
of
the
work
that
they're
supposed
to
and
they
meet
all
the
requirements,
but
from
a
government
perspective,
what
can
we
as
the
governmental
units,
the
executive
branch,
the
board
of
commissioners,
do
to
incentivize
what
we
really
need,
which
is
affordable
housing
in
places?
Besides
the
low
income
areas
of
oakland
county,
I
mean
we
need
housing
there,
but
we
also
need
good
housing
broadly
across
the
county
affordable.
D
So
I
would
like
to
really
delve
much
more
deeply
into
that
conversation
and-
and
I'd
like
to
you
know,
have
the
developer
community
input
as
well,
because
they
come
to
a
community
like
novi
and
they're
going
to
build
what
they
want
to
build.
If
novi
says
go
ahead,
you
know
how
do
we,
how
do
we
incentivize
that?
So
that's
my
my
point
on
this
as
well
as
the
next
proposal,
but
I
I
will
be
in
support
of
this
proposal.
Thank
you.
K
F
Thank
you,
mr
chair,
good
morning,
those
of
you
speaking
to
this
report,
mr
or
I
should
say
andy
and
gary
in
particular
my
reason
for
grabbing
the
mic.
I'm
yolanda
charles,
I
represent
the
communities
of
southfield,
lathrop,
village
and
oak
park.
F
My
perspective
may
be
just
a
tad
different
than
my
colleagues
who
have
spoken
so
far
while
I
do
agree
wholeheartedly,
but
I'm
advocating
for
for
some
of
the
opposite,
where
I
don't
want.
My
community
riddled
with
low
housing,
low-income
housing,
my
school
district
is
one
of
the
leading
school
districts.
F
Well,
one
of
both
of
my
school
districts,
probably
you
could
say,
are
leading
the
state
with
regards
to
helping
majority
minority
communities
and
they
have
families
and
children
who
want
a
yard,
grass
parks,
access
to
trees
and
fresh
air,
which
isn't
always
what
we're
given
when
you
have
multi-family
units
and
things
of
that
nature.
So,
like
I
said
my
reason
for
speaking
right
now
is
really
just
to
encourage
andy
and
gary
to
look
at
southfield.
F
F
I
mean
it's
just
kind
of
cyclical,
so
thank
you
for
being
here
today,
but
please
heed
my
words
and
we'd
love
to
to
talk
further
and
thank
you
ingrid
for
your
comments
as
well.
A
C
Thank
you.
Mr
chair
ashley
andy
answered
most
of
my
questions
that
this
development's
been
approved
by
the
township
planning
commission.
It
sounds
like
so
that
was
one
of
my
big
questions,
because
if
you
looked
at
the
surrounding
communities,
identity
and
this
development
looked
a
little
bit
larger
than
the
ones
that
were
surrounding
it,
but
I
don't
know
the
area
that
we're
often
looking
into
that
kind
of
detail,
but
the
planning
commission
has
approved
it
and
it's
ready
to
move
forward.
They've
answered
all
my
questions.
A
E
Yeah,
thank
you
chair.
I
wanted
to
echo
what
commissioner
markham
said.
I'm
going
to
vote
yes,
because
gary
and
andy
you
put
two
and
a
half
years
of
work
in
so
I
hope
I
didn't
spook
you,
but
I
do
think
that
time
is
not
on
our
side
in
terms
of
figuring
these
things
out.
So
it's
better.
If
we're
going
to
change
the
rules,
we
change
them
before
other
communities
and
other
developers
get
too
far
down
the
road.
That's!
Hence
my
questions
to
you
in
grid.
Thank
you
for
answering
them.
A
Thank
you.
I
said
couple
comments.
First,
I
do
appreciate
andy
saying
that
you
guys
do
typically
use
union
shops
me
being
a
tradesperson,
that's
near
and
dear
to
my
heart
and
using
oakland
county,
which
is
even
an
extra
one.
So
I
appreciate
that
the
question
I
had
was
so
with
the
hazardous
materials.
A
I
know
the
eagle
has
their
requirements,
do.
Does
the
brownfield
language
and
I
have
to
re-look
at
it
again
the
contract?
Does
it
mandate,
certifications
in
that
field
to
make
sure
that
companies
have
the
certifications
in
that
area
or,
if,
because
I
know
personally
like
if
it's
hazmat
or
if
it's
osha,
30
or
osha
10,
if
I'm
working
on
a
job
which
I've
been
in
the
field
that
I
had
to
have
that,
even
even
if
I
wasn't
actually
the
operator
digging
that
up,
I
still
had
to
have
it
to
be
on
the
job.
A
So
it's
not
necessarily
the
company
having
the
certification,
it's
the
individual
workers.
So
is
that
part
of
the
brownfield
as
well.
J
I'm
going
to
thank
you
for
the
question
I'm
going
to
defer
to
jessica
de
bone
who's.
Our
environmental
consultant
who's
been
working
on
this
for
the
last
several
years
as
well,
she's
with
pm
environmental,
and
she
can
answer
that
question
and
I
do
have
a
follow-up
comment.
I'd
like
to
make
as
well.
H
Yeah,
thank
you.
So
I
do
want
to
clarify
that
the
contamination
on
site
that
was
identified
was
very
limited
in
nature.
It
does
not
actually
exceed
existing
criteria
per
eagle
as
it
relates
to
actually
enforceable
criteria.
What
it
does
exceed
is
vapor
intrusion,
I
say
criteria,
but
it's
not.
It's
not
set
criteria
under
statute,
so
the
property
isn't
technically
considered
a
facility.
H
H
H
I
don't
believe
that
there's
language,
essentially
that
is
mandating
that
to
occur
within
the
brownfield
plan,
but
that's
our
job
to
ensure
that
that
happens.
J
And
then,
if
I
take
a
moment
just
to
address
some
of
the
other
comments
that
were
made,
I
think
the
commissioners
have
raised
excellent
comments.
Some
of
them
are
opposing
each
other,
but
I
think
they're
all
valid
and
it's
a
it's
an
issue
that's
going
on
not
only
in
michigan
but
across
the
country.
This
need
for
affordable,
housing
and
and
work
for
it
and
we're
also,
for
you
know,
developing
higher-end
housing
in
in
communities
that
don't
see
it.
J
What
I
would
recommend-
and
I
would
personally
volunteer
my
time
to
work
in
conjunction
with
with
this
committee
or
this
board,
to
have
a
series
of
workshops
and
just
get
a
developers
or
an
economic
perspective
as
well.
In
addition
to
a
government
perspective,
I
think
it's
a
it's
a
bad
lead.
Both
subjects
are
are
badly
needed
and
I
think
it's
time
to
do
something
about
it
and
we
just
volunteer
my
time
to
work
on
such
a
committee.
A
Thank
you
appreciate
that.
Do
we
have
any
any
other
discussion.
J
A
A
A
I
Good
morning,
yeah
this
this
brownfield
project
set
located
at
7020
orchard
lake
in
west
bloomfield.
It's
the
former
cauley
automotive.
If
any
of
you
are
familiar
with
driving
by
that
that
site
automotive
was
in
operation
from
1978
to
roughly
2019
when
they
seized
operation
and
it's
been
vacant.
Since
that
time,
the
proposed
redevelopment
is
a
five-story
213
apartment
redevelopment,
roughly
around
73
million
dollar.
Overall
investment
for
the
site.
I
The
site
is
classified
as
facility
or
contamination
means
there's,
unlike
the
other
one.
There
are
compounds
in
the
ground
that
are
over
exceedance
of
part
201
in
the
state
of
michigan,
so
there's
going
to
need
to
be
2.1
million
dollars
roughly
of
contaminated
soil
on
groundwater
removal.
There's
several
areas
that
the
these
contaminants
were
found,
mainly
just
in
the
body
shop
area
in
the
garage
of
the
kali
automotive,
the
former,
the
building
itself.
I
I
The
township
west,
bloomfield
township
has
limited
this
captured
to
five
years,
resulting
in
the
redevelopment
estimate
of
the
redeveloper
development
team.
Getting
reimbursed
2.125
million
out
of
the
eligible
2.787
million
dollars,
this
increases
the
tax
base
by
10.5
million
dollars
and
again
it's
it'll
be
a
short
five-year
payback
period.
I
So
I
also
have
seth
horkovitz
from
hunter
pasture
homes,
on
the
line
he's
the
the
main
development
of
this
project
and
just
like
the
last
project
jessica
de
bone
from
pm
environmental
is
there
in
raymond's
consultant
so
I'll
be
able
to
answer
any
questions
again,
ingrid's
here
as
well,
then
also
seth
and
jessica.
F
Yeah
so
morning
after
morning,
everyone-
I
was
just
thinking,
but
you
said
it's
a
former
auto
auto
dealership.
So
the
likelihood
of
a
lot
of
trees
being
displaced
is
probably
not
the
case,
but
that
is
something
of
when
we're
talking
about
jessica.
Is
it
de
bone?
I'm
sure
that's
something
that
falls
well
within
her
wheelhouse
and
just
as
a
aside
is
just
simply,
you
know
the
cost
of
lumber
and
materials
while
that's
not
in
our
purview.
F
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we're
mindful
in
using
the
best
sources
for
for
the
construction
projects
and
in
the
places
that
we're
putting
these
things.
You
know
they
just
have
to
all
kind
of
melt
together,
so
not
really
a
question
more
of
a
comment.
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
C
Yeah.
Thank
you.
This
is
true
mine's,
more
of
a
systemic
question,
maybe
brad
we
could
talk
outside
of
this.
This
is
the
second
I'm
going
to
call
automotive
repair
location
that
we're
looking
at
in
the
last
month
and
they
all
just
seem
to
be
relatively
similar
to
what
they
need
needs
to
happen
to
them
to
clean
them
up,
and
I'm
a
little
concerned
that
the
taxpayers
around
open
county
are
having
to
help
pay
to
clean
some
of
these
places.
C
A
I
agree
with
commissioner
spitz
any
other
discussion,
commissioner
markham.
D
Right,
thank
you.
I
also
agree
with
commissioner
spizz
and
generally
you
know
these
situations
where
the
taxpayers
are
gonna.
The
taxpayers
of
the
county
are
gonna
support,
something
you
know
specific
in
a
community.
Those
questions
should
be
asked.
I
think,
about
the
city
of
pontiac
all
the
time,
because
corporations
were
allowed
to
just
pick
up
and
leave,
and
it's
not
the
only
community
in
michigan.
D
That's
like
this,
but
that
is,
in
my
view,
over
the
long
term,
part
of
what
contributed
to
the
economic
decline
of
communities
like
that
in
our
state
and
so
yeah.
I
don't
think
companies
should
just
be
able
to
pick
up
and
leave
with
and
leave
contaminated
sites
which
we
all
have
to
pay
for
cleaning
up.
So
thank
you,
mr
spitz,
for
making
that
point.
D
I
just
have
one
point:
I'd
like
to
make
here
about
the
development
itself
and
in
the
summary
it
talks
about
again
it's
luxury
apartments
right,
but
it's
going
to
have
it's
being
built
to
lead
standards,
it's
going
to
have
electric
charging
stations,
and
so
there
is
a
recognition
that
we
need
to
be
building
these
developments
with
environmental
sensitivity
going
forward
as
well.
D
A
A
A
Thank
you
thank
you,
and,
and
now
we
have
yep
now
we
have
the
the
agenda
items
that
were
moved
from
the
consent
agenda
to
the
regular
agenda
and
I
believe
we
can
do
them
at
the
same
time
just
because
for
clarification
for
a
b,
it's
fiscal
year,
2022
appropriation
with
the
city
of
southfield
for
the
tri-party
road
improvement
program,
project
number
55251
and
fiscal
year,
2022
appropriation
with
the
city
of
auburn
hills
for
the
tri-party
road
improvement
project,
number:
five,
six,
four:
three
and
we're
the
question
is
the
fifth:
whereas
is
not
in
the
the
southfield
or
the
in
the
auburn
hills
one,
but
it's
in
the
southfield
one!
G
I
think
also,
including
here,
is
lynn
sanchez,
our
fiscal
officer
with
management
and
budget
welcome,
and
so
why
you're,
seeing
that
particular
warehouse
statement
in
one
versus
the
other
is
the
tri-party
road
improvement
program
has
been
a
collaboration
between
the
road
commission,
oakland
county
and
the
local
cvts
for
a
good
40
years
now,
since
the
1970s,
when
the
locals
propose
a
project
to
the
road
commission,
that
will
utilize
not
only
state
of
michigan
funding
through
act
51,
but
then
also
county
funds,
which
the
board
approves
each
and
every
year
with
their
tri-party
road
improvement
program
and
then
recently,
since
2016
with
the
local
bi-party
program,
which
has
totally
different
policies
and
everything
like
that.
G
But
they
will
propose
a
project
to
the
road
commission
to
which
the
road
commission
and
their
commissioners
have
to
approve
within
that.
In
this
particular
case,
the
city
of
southfield
has
selected
that
the
12-mile
road
improvement,
the
12-mile
road
from
washer
to
evergreen
is
such
a
big
project
that
it's
going
to
take
multiple
years.
So
within
a
multi-year
you
know
road
maintenance
or
road
whatever.
I
didn't
look
too
closely
into
what
it
actually
is,
but
they're
going
to
utilize
a
lot
of
different
funding
sources
for
that
one
of
those
is
a
fiscal
year.
G
2023
appropriation
in
this
case
the
board
hasn't
approved
their
fiscal
2023,
tri-party
road
improvement
program
assignment.
Yet
so
the
reason
that
you're,
seeing
that
in
there
is
mainly
just
a
clause
that
gives
the
county
some
kind
of
leeway
or
some
kind
of
protection
that
if
the
board
happens
to
not
approve
the
funding.
For
that
the
count,
the
local
community
will
take
up
a
lot
of
that
funding
in
order
to
complete
their
the
project
that
they
propose
to
the
road
commission.
F
That's
crystal
clear,
and
I
appreciate
that
explanation
so
thank
you
for
walking
down
here
to
to
say
that
no.
G
A
A
Moved
by
commissioner
spitz
second
by
commissioner,
charles
I'm,
sorry,
commissioner
wiper
moved
it
yeah,
mr
charles
seconded
it,
and
then
we
had
the
discussion
and
can
we
call
the
role
prompt
the
vote.
A
Motion
carries
thank
you
so
now,
we'll
we'll
go
we'll
come
to
the
second
public
comment.
Anyone
for
the
second
public
comment
hearing
none
seeing
nobody
we'll
call
the
second
public
comment
closed.
Now
we
have
other
business.
We
have,
commissioner,
charles.
F
Very
quickly
guys,
I
just
wanted
to
remind
that
next
week
is
considered
stem
week
across
the
country,
and
there
is
a
miscellaneous
resolution
coming
before
most
of
us
well
all
of
us
to
highlight
november,
8th
and
the
week
that
it
entails,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
encourage
commissioners.
A
There's.
No,
there
isn't
a
way
that
you
can
make
an
owner
of
a
property,
have
affordable
housing
right
because
they're
going
to
go
wherever
the
market
is,
and
I
I
fell
victim
of
that
when
I
was
in
a
housing
like
they
just
considered
themselves
as
downtown
farmington,
but
they're
two
miles
away
and
my
rent
went
up
1200
right,
so
it'd
have
to
be
either
with
the
county
or
the
city
to
give
some
kind
of
tax
relief
for
that
or
tax
incentive.
A
E
But
to
what
you're
just
saying
chair
and
what
you
said
earlier,
commissioner:
markham
part
of
the
housing
plan
for
arpa.
That's
been
come
up
by
that
study
group,
which
involves
all
the
housing
agencies
in
oakland
county
one
and
so
that
and
the
blueprint
the
housing
blueprint
that
the
housing
department
is
going
to
publish
the
week
of
november.
15.
E
show
two
really
big
things:
one
you
have
to
incentivize
developers
to
go
where
the
market
isn't
that's
an
affordable
housing
trust
fund,
which
is
an
eligible
expense
through
arpa
and
then
second,
the
need
for
people
that
aren't
quite
up
there
to
what
you
were
saying:
commission,
markham
about
worker
housing.
There's
things
like
community
land
trusts.
E
There's
things
like
affordable
housing,
trust
fund
that
then
are
can
be
created
and
funded
to
allow
developers
to
get
matching
funds
or
use
state
dollars
in
federal
dollars
through
the
county
and
an
affordable
housing
trust
fund
to
make
developments
that
help
people
that
make
120
percent
or
lower
of
the
area
median
income
so
that
they
can
live
in
the
community
that
they
work
in
and
that's
the
answer.
There
is
affordable
housing,
trust
fund
and
that's
been
done
all
over
the
country,
so
you'll
be
seeing
more
of
that
soon.
A
F
Yeah,
I
love
the
conversation
and
we
really
do
have
conversation
so
just
just
coming
from
10
years,
where
I've
seen
cities
do
tax
abatements,
and
it's
just
you
know
as
a
resident
you're
like.
Oh,
it's
a
tax
payment,
it's
all
good,
but
when
you
are
the
treasurer
on
a
school
board
and
you
get
those
bills
for
like
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
that
you
have
to
return
because
of
these
abatements.
It
can
be
very
scary,
especially
for
school
districts.
F
That
may
not
have
the
money
so
to
hear
that
there's
an
opportunity
to
eliminate
abatements
while
still
helping
attract
good
developers
is,
is
very
intriguing
to
me.
E
F
A
All
right:
well,
if
we
hear
none,
we'll
call
the
committee
closed
at
what
do
we
got
10
21..