►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
C
D
B
B
You
that
motion
carries
takes
us
to
item
five
on
the
agenda.
I
have
no
adjustments
or
anything
to
add
or
subtract
any.
Therefore,
we
can
go
ahead
and
take
a
motion
to
approve
the
agenda
as
it
is
and
supported
by
commissioner
Johnson.
Thank
you.
B
B
H
I,
just
yes,
we
met
last
week,
commissioner
Montgomery
chair
said,
and
then
we
had
almost
every
Community
eligible
to
put
in
an
app
and
we're,
and
one
more
is
coming
I
think
it's
going
to
be
Amendment.
So
it's
it's
a
good
program.
Yes,.
B
D
Just
a
quick
question
for
you,
clarification
point
so
I
understand:
try
party
is
a
completely
separate
program
from
this
correct,
so
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
I
understood
it
and
then,
in
terms
of
the
projects
that
are
approved,
are
those
submitted
ahead
of
time
by
the
city.
Is
that
how
they
make
this
list
or
how
did
we
get
to
this
point
through.
H
The
through
the
chair
yeah,
so
we
started
this
in
16
and
it's
a
local
Road
Improvement
project
and
this
our
commission
here
is
sort
of
allocated
two
million
dollars
in
the
budget
to
go
to
local
roads
and
then
each
Community
submits
applications
for
eligible
projects
and
that's
what
we
reviewed
at
the
L
rip
committee
meeting
supplement
meeting
of
this
subcommittee
of
this
committee
and
we
went
through
all
the
applications
and
it's
a
matching,
and
so
every
Community
I
think
or
might
have
opted
out.
Okay,
but
every
Community
is
getting
is
part
of.
H
J
No
understood
try
party,
thank
you,
madam
chairs,
with
M
with
the
road
commission
correct
right.
This
is
us,
and
the
locals
got
it
good,
which
is
the
commission
adding
more
money
to
fix
more
roads,
got.
D
Commission,
roads,
it's
local
roads,
correct
understood,
understand.
Thank
you.
Yeah
I
appreciate
that
one
problem
we
have
I
mean
I,
think
well
and
it's
part
of
the
question
you
know
I'm
all
for
this
I
think
it's
a
great
program,
I
just
I
personally,
wasn't
aware
of
it
until
just
recently
as
I
was,
you
know,
reviewing
all
this
and
we
actually
have
a
local
Road
in
my
district
that
has
been
asking
for
some
help
for
some
time
again
had
I
known
I
probably
would
have
at
least
made
them
aware
or
added
this
to
the
list.
D
So
I
don't
know
if
that
time
frame
is
already
closed
or
because
I
think
we
were
just
slightly
under
the
budget
of
what
we
proposed
so
I,
don't
know
if
there's
still
opportunity
to
do
that
or
if
we're
already
too
late.
For
that
we
have
the
money.
Let's
imagine,
for
example,
yeah
correct
they
do
have
they
do
have
they
do
have
enough
to
match.
They
don't
have
enough
to
do
the
entire
project
themselves.
D
H
Think
there's
an
amendment
coming
for
the
next
board
meeting
for
a
town
that
still
was
oh.
H
I
B
Right,
thank
you.
That
motion
carries
takes
us
to
item
eight
on
the
regular
agenda
item:
a
is
economic
development,
Aviation
and
transportation,
Osa
seal
Runway,
pavement,
surface
joints,
Airfield
crack
ceiling,
rehabilitate
Runway,
Airfield
paint,
marking
construction,
Grant
acceptance
and
we
I'll
take
a
motion
to
that
flew
by
twister,
long
supported
by
commissioner
Miller,
and
we
have
Miss
Bush
here
to
speak
with
us
about
this.
It's
going
to
be
a
recommendation
to
the
board
the
floor.
F
Is
yours?
Thank
you,
madam
chair
good
morning.
Everyone.
This
first
item
is
seeking
Grant
acceptance
for
a
very
long
name
for
improvements
in
our
Oakland
Southwest
airport.
This
is
a
Grant
that's
offered
every
other
year
for
crack
ceiling,
paint
marking
and
general
maintenance
at
the
airport.
It's
a
12
667
dollar
Grant
that
requires
a
match
of
634
dollars
and
so
we're
hoping
to
move
forward.
J
F
This
is
Oakland
Southwest
and
South
line,
so
this
is
what
you're
doing
this
International
Oakland
County
International.
So.
J
B
B
Thank
you
for
that,
so
that
motion
carries
and
takes
us
to
the
next
item,
which
is
aforementionedly
also
long
in
its
name:
Item
B,
the
economic
development,
Aviation
Transportation,
ptk,
rehabilitate
Runway,
Airfield
paint,
marking
construction,
seal
Runway,
pavement,
surface
joints,
Airfield
crack
ceiling,
construction,
Grant
acceptance,
Mr
wiper
moves
and
Mr
Miller
supports
and
Miss
Bush.
Please
help
us
make
good
decisions.
F
Okay,
this
is
the
identical
Grant,
as
previously
discussed
for
Oakland
County
International
Airport,
the
numbers
get
a
little
bit
bigger
because
the
airport's
a
little
bit
bigger,
more
Runway
to
maintain.
So
this
grant
is
for
134
900,
with
a
match
of
six
thousand
seven
hundred
and
forty
five
again
Grant
acceptance
through
Michigan
Department
of
Transportation.
These
are
federal
dollars.
B
B
You
that
motion
carries
thank
you,
Miss
Bush.
Thank
you.
So
much
have
a
good
rest
of
your
week.
Thank
you
that
takes
us
to
item
C
on
the
agenda,
which
is
the
fiscal
year.
2023
roof
replacement
projects
under
facilities,
planning
and
engineering,
and
we
have
with
us
Jason
Warner,
Governor
yeah,
welcome.
Jason
can.
F
L
Good
morning,
I'm
Jason
Warner
the
manager
of
planning
engineering
with
Facilities
Management
today,
bringing
a
resolution
to
you
for
1
million
three
hundred
thirty
one
thousand
seven
hundred
and
sixty
dollars
to
replace
two
roofs,
one
at
the
little
Oaks
facility
and
the
other
at
the
Sheriff's
Office
patrol
services
facility
I,
both
roofs
are
asphalt,
shingle,
roofs,
currently,
those
roofs
are
both
over
20
years
old
and
as
we
have
experienced
leaking
issues
and
Ice
damming
issues
over
the
last
few
years,
we're
proposing
to
replace
both
roofs
with
metal
roofs.
L
L
There's
a
warranty
50..
The
warranty
is
20
for
labor
and
the
actual
complete
system,
but
the
the
painted
finish
the
exterior
finish
on
it.
A
manufacturer
went
up
to
40
years
on
top.
L
Yeah
cast
sheet
metal;
okay
via
the
roofing
contract,.
J
L
B
L
System
yeah,
we'll
coordinate
with
with
Pete
the
the
restraint
system
company
you
know
come
out
and
install
that
system
once
the
new
roof's
installed.
B
It
wasn't
offered
into
the
to
the
comments,
but
someone
on
the
right
of
me
kind
of
said
that
they
were
loud.
Are
they
loud?
Are
they?
Are
they
the.
L
Metal,
roofs
yeah,
it
will
be
a
little
bit
louder.
We
do
have
25
000,
where
we'll
add
more
insulation.
Both
of
those
attic
spaces
are
conditioned
spaces
because
there's
mechanical
equipment
up
there,
so
they
are
heated
and
cooled.
So
there
is
insulation
on
the
roof
deck
currently,
but
we
will
be
adding
some
more
acoustical
insulation,
yeah.
B
C
L
Depositive
right
now,
but
I
believe
it's
a
brown
color
I
don't
know.
Is
it
it's
going
to
something
that'll
match
the
exterior
of
the
building?
So
if.
C
L
More
of
like
aesthetic,
yeah,
good
good
question
I
will
I'll
go
back
and
talk
to
our
team
about
that.
A
J
A
B
And
we
are
welcomed
at
the
table
by
our
chairman
of
the
Board
of
Commissioners
for
Oakland
County,
and
he
will
be
sitting
in
as
an
ex-official
member
all
right
so
item
D
on
the
agenda,
yes
and
I,
see
Jim,
Nash
and
Company
are
excited
and
already
up
there.
Let's
see
if
we
can
get
this
motion
approved
to
let
you
all
speak
to
us
today.
B
I'll,
take
a
motion
to
open
and
entertain
item
D,
which
is
appropriation
of
American
Rescue
plan
act,
fiscal
recovery,
funds
for
Northwest,
Oakland,
sanitary
drain,
drainage,
District
phase,
one
move
by
commissioner
Miller
supported
by
twister
wiper
and
with
that
I'm
a
little
just,
but
who
do
I
know
commissioner
quarter
resource
commissioner?
Is
it
Steve
I'm
Brian
covert,
you're
Brian?
Thank
you.
Welcome,
Brian
and
the
floor
is
yours.
Gentlemen.
Thank
you.
I'm.
O
Down
the
front,
Okay
well
I'm,
very
excited
to
be
here:
I've,
been
working
on
this
project
for
about
three
years,
trying
to
get
her
support
and
and
navigate
several
different
communities
and
read
you
know
in
the
region,
but
the
the
project
itself
is
to
bring
sanitary
sewer
to
Northwest
Oakland
County,
which
is
an
area
that's
pretty
rural
in
character,
but
they
have
some
very
discreet
economic
development
areas
and
they
also
have
some
they're,
also
the
headwaters
of
the
Flint
River.
O
So
we've
been
pursuing
this
through
through
the
Water
Resource
commissioner's
office
to
to
to
bring
this
problem
direct
true
to
fruition.
This
phase
involves
the
purchase
of
capacity
and
a
sewer.
That's
going
to
be
built
by
Genesee
County,
it's
a
35
million
dollar
project.
Our
share
of
that
project
is
10
million
dollars.
O
You
know
it's
a
pipe
has
to
be
big
enough
to
support
the
flow
that
this
area
will
be
providing.
So
we
did
a
study,
we
determined
how
many
foil
was
necessary,
and
so
the
pipe
will
be.
You
know,
with
our
payment
of
10
million
dollars
generally
counting
both
the
pipe
big
enough
to
accommodate
future
capacity.
O
The
communities
want
to
be
able
to
serve
be
served
by
the
sewer
because
they
need
to
do
their
own
extensions
and
that's
unfunded
at
this
point.
It's
about
90
million
dollars
of
future
work,
but
at
this
point
we're
setting
them
up
in
phase
one
to
have
that
ability
to
connect
in
the
future.
When
money
comes,
we
came
forward
with
a
resolution
in
June
2022
to
the
Board
of
Commissioners
to
allocate
the
10
million
dollars
from
arpa
funds.
O
The
dreams
District
was
formed
shortly
after
that
to
negotiate
the
contract.
Do
the
design
do
the
study
on
behalf
of
the
communities
they
signed
petitions
they
provide
200
000
of
their
own
money
towards
engineering
and
legal
fees.
To
try
to
get
to
this
point.
So
we've
negotiated
the
agreement.
We're
at
the
point
we're
ready
to
sign.
O
N
Mean
I
want
to
add
a
couple
of
things
as
as
Brian
said,
this
has
been
going
on
for
several
years
and
before
this
was
going
on.
The
problem
of
failing
septics
has
been
a
significant
issue
up
there.
This
is
one
of
those
things
that
is
a
Statewide
issue.
Eagle
estimates,
one
in
four
septic
fields,
railing,
that's
significant.
This
is
our
biggest
impact
of
that
in
Oakland
County.
N
This
there's
several
things
about
this
project.
He
mentioned
that
the
flow
is
set
up
for
accepting
the
flow
from
Oakland
County,
it's
limited,
so
there's
no
room
for
any
other
flow,
so
this
wouldn't
encourage
any
kind
of
sprawl.
This
is
already
developed
area
and
it
would
be
a
future
that
they
could
then
in
this
specific
areas,
develop
what
they
need
to
develop.
N
This
is
this
will
affect
several
lakes
in
that
area
that
are
already
being
affected
by
failing
septics.
If
we
don't
do
something
about
that
either
the
Lakes
will
get
more
polluted
or
people
will
not
have
be
able
to
live
in
their
homes.
So
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we're
converting
this
system
into
a
long-term
way
of
doing
this.
N
If
you
know
some
people
can
put
in
if
they
have
room
an
engineered
field
in
their
system,
but
those
aren't
guaranteed
either
for
any
length
of
time.
So
the
only
way
to
do
this
in
the
long
term
is
to
be
part
of
a
sewer
system.
N
More,
like
eight
years
ago,
we
worked
with
the
community
of
Ortonville,
the
village
of
Ortonville
and
Brandon
Township
to
do
not
only
a
collection
system,
but
also
a
a
treatment
system
which
would
have
added
way
more
cost
to
it.
Those
failed
up
in
those
they
couldn't
get
the
support
they
needed.
N
So
that
was
a
much
larger
project.
This
gives
us
the
ability
to
build
a
a
collection
system,
but
already
existing
treatment
system
is
there,
so
those
those
costs
won't
affect
these
communities
and
they'll
be
much
more
likely
to
afford
this
in
the
long
run.
This
is
something
that
again,
we've
been
working
on
for
a
significant
amount
of
time.
N
We
want
to
make
sure
that
the
long-term
ability
to
live
up
in
that
area
is
is
protected
and
the
the
water
resources
that
are
affected
by
this,
not
only
in
those
Lakes
but
as
as
Brian
mentioned,
the
we're
the
headwaters
of
the
of
the
Flint
River,
and
we
don't
want
to
be
able
to.
We
don't
want
to
be
putting
in
pollutants
that
will
be
come
back
on
us
with
lawsuits
and
things
in
the
future.
So
we
want
to
make
sure
we're
protecting
that
that
Watershed
I
just
wanted
to
run
that
by
you
too.
O
So
one
more
thing
I
want
to
mention
is
that
the
sewer
only
served
five
percent
of
the
land
areas
in
the
township.
It's
consistent
with
their
master
plan,
there's
a
lot
of
open
state-owned
land.
That
would
never
be
served,
and
you
know
it's
being
done
in
a
very
smart
growth
kind
of
principled
way
of
only
serving
areas
that
have
a
need
to
be
served
and
not
go
going
into
sprawl.
O
B
Thank
you.
I
have
a
few
Commissioners
with
questions.
Commissioner
Miller,
followed
by
commissioner
Johnson,
followed
by
commissioner.
Thank.
J
You
manager
so
because
I
know
a
lot
of
the
Commissioners
weren't
here.
This
was
a
project
at
Congressional,
Melissa
slack
and
was
able
to
get
earmarked
money,
and
my
understanding
talking
artwork
was
her.
Is
the
Genesee
County
doesn't
need
us
for
this
project,
they're,
actually
letting
us
allowing
us.
It
would
cost
more
for
Oakland
County.
O
B
Thank
you,
commissioner.
Miller
good
reminder,
commissioner
Johnson
well.
C
You
stole
my
thunder
I
was
going
to
say:
I
worked
for
Alyssa
on
the
hill
and
I.
Remember
how
big
of
a
push
this
was
in
our
office
and
her
team
still
Prouds
me
about
it.
I
think
I'm.
The
only
vaguely
northerner
at
the
table
here
so
yeah
I
know
for
for
all
those
communities
up
there
they'll
be
really
appreciated.
I
Thank
you,
Miss
Sloan
I
just
wanted
to
know
so
because
you
said
about
sprawl,
so
are
they
existing
homes,
gonna
Connect
into
this.
O
So
there's
very
few
existing
homes
in
Groveland
and
Holly.
That
would
connect
in
okay
a
lot
of
it's
going
to
be
kind
of
Redevelopment,
and
it's
only
going
to
serve
that
Dixie
Corridor,
okay,
but
people
who
are
in
their
houses
or
maybe
elderly
or
or
don't
have
enough
money
to
connect
would
never
be
forced
to
connect
until
they
sell
and
then
they
wouldn't
have
to
connect.
Okay.
O
I
And
are
they
all
mostly
supportive
of
this
up?
There.
N
I
So
they
have
one
more
question.
Sorry,
if
it
was
an
old
say,
a
older,
you
know,
and
it's
going
right
by
them
in
an
older
house
can
connect.
Is
it
an
sad
going
to
be
in
the
communities
or
yeah.
O
We're
going
to
work
with
the
communities
they're
working
on
their
Master
plans
right
now
on
how
they're
going
to
serve
areas
once
we
have
the
thing
near
the
sewer
in
place,
but
yeah
that
you
know
it's.
A
lot
of
sad
is
probably
around
the
Lakes,
especially
okay.
It's
probably
going
to
be
a
special
assessment.
I'm.
I
P
Thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much,
Madam
chair.
So
all
this
wonderful
conversation
now
we're
going
to
have
some
some
tough
talk
when
we
approve
this
and
I
was
supportive
of
allocating
the
10
million
dollars
to
build
this
I
mean
many
of
you
know
that
I'm
anything
that
can
build
new
infrastructure
is
necessary,
particularly
the
environmental
concerns
that
the
Water
Resource,
commissioner
and
the
staff
has
raised
over
the
years.
P
There
is
a
recognition
that
we
have
incredible
gray.
Infrastructure
needs
all
across
the
county
and
particularly
in
a
lot
of
I
mean
tremendous
needs
in
areas
that
are
I
mean
low
income
and,
frankly,
don't
have
the
means
to
fix
all
the
existing
infrastructure,
and
so
this
amount
to
that
when
we
set
the
10
million
dollars
aside,
it
was
I
mean
the
opportunity
cost.
P
We
can't
allocate
those
10
million
dollars,
we're
using
arpa
dollars
for
this
and
it's
an
eligible
expense,
but
it
also
means
there's
10
million
dollars
that
aren't
available
to
be
used
for
other
things,
and
so
there's
a
take
that
into
consideration.
When
we
talk
about
the
environmental
issues,
there's
no
question
that
that
this
level
of
investment
I
mean
that
something
needs
to
be
done
to
address
the
septic
I
mean
system
here,
but,
frankly,
their
septic
systems.
All
over.
P
Sometimes
we
don't
even
know
where
they
are
and
and
and
figuring
out
a
long-term
strategy
to
do
that,
and
so
myself
and
others
have
raised
me
this
question
that
make
putting
the
money
up
so
that
we
can
build
this
drain
because
of
the
one-time
opportunity
that
commissioner
Miller
I
mean
in
a
cheaper
way.
P
If
you
will
makes
sense,
coupled
with
I
mean
this
is
10
million
here,
but
there's
also
additional
dollars
that
we've
allocated,
we
put
some
planning
grants
and
other
types
of
things
I
believe
local
communities
have
also
been
using
those
dollars.
So
this
is
north
of
10
million
dollars.
We
add
all
the
arbor
resources
that
we
are
in
support
of
this
project,
which
I
think
is
a
demonstration
of
the
recognition.
P
Should
we
recapture
some
of
these
dollars
that,
in
theory,
can
be
redeployed
to
help
support
gray
infrastructure
or
other
type
of
sewer
infrastructure
all
across
the
county
and
I
feel,
like
I've,
been
like
a
broken
record
on
this
on
this
point
or
mechanisms
to
incentivize
communities,
I
mean
commissioner
long
I
think
we
have
a
an
issue
of
dealing
a
sewer
appeals
board
to
fix
something
in
your
necklace
to
give
an
incentive
for
communities
to
hook
up
to
existing
infrastructure.
P
That's
not
currently
in
place
that
we
need
a
whole
strategy
and
I,
don't
think
anyone
disagrees
with
the
native
I
mean
hooked
into
a
sewer
system
that
can
go
into
a
treatment
plant
is
better
for
the
entire
world.
This
question
about
whether
or
not
I
mean
if
Oakland
county
is
going
to
Pony
up
I
mean
10
million
dollars,
and
some
of
that
be
recaptured
to
be
able
to
support
gray
infrastructure
in
some
of
the
area
is
a
reasonable
consideration.
P
I
am
frustrated
and
I've
shared
this
with
staff
that,
despite
I,
mean
kind
of
that
being
like
that
broken
record
approach
to
this,
that
a
decision
was
made
to
negotiate
with
local
communities
that
this
is
a
gift.
You
don't
have
to
worry
about
paying
back
any
of
this
money
without
this
board
or
broadly
it
being
communicated
right,
because
I
firmly
believe
that
that
that's
appropriate,
not
all
of
it-
I
mean
we
can
share
into
this,
but
recognizing
that
this
is
the
largest
infrastructure
allocation
of
all
of
our
arpa
dollars.
P
It's
hard
for
me
to
look
back
Beyond,
some
of
the
equity
issues
around
infrastructure
across
the
county,
and
so
I
mean
I
struggle
with
that
I
hear
this
I
mean
the
the
issue
about
sprawl
and
that
the
pipe
is
only
so
big
and
I
said
you
can
only
put
so
much
into
it.
So
I
mean
it's
not.
This
argument
is
not
going
to
create
sprawl
but
as
I
understand
that
there
is
excess
capacity,
that
is
I
mean
in
the
pipe
that's
not
being
consumed.
It's
like
15
I.
P
Remember
that's
for
future
build
out
the
future
build
out
which,
which
is
what
was
in
the
six
thousand
units
and
then
six
thousand
years
right
and
so
I
I,
hear
that
and
I
also
know
that
this
is
going
to
I
mean
lead
to
some
economic
development
in
that
area.
That
is
going
to
lead
to
a
need
for
more
road
infrastructure.
It
is
going
to
contribute
to
sprawl
and
development
in
that
area.
Now
we
can
help
me
argue,
I
mean
I
I,
generally
love
building
things,
I
prefer
rebuilding
things,
but
recognizing
the
environmental
issue.
P
I
mean
I,
put
100
down
right
now
that
we
are
going
to
see
like
sprawling
activities,
I
I
get
that
I.
Think
some
local
leaders
want
to
keep
the
the
the
rural
nature
of
that
northwest
corner
what
it
is,
but
there
is
going
to
be
incredible:
incredible
pressure
to
increase
tax
base
in
order
to
maintain
basic
townships,
Municipal
Services
I
mean
it's
just
it's
a
it's.
A
it's
it's
the
nature
of
the
Beast,
so
I
mean
I,
am
concerned
about
that
I'm.
P
Looking
beyond
that,
I
do
think
in
this
case
that
the
environmental
benefit
outweighs
some
of
those
short-term
concerns,
but
I
still
take.
Let
me
see
my
frustration
with
and
the
fact
that
I
mean
hey.
We've
been
very
supportive.
We
aren't
we've
allocated
planning
dollars
and
other
types
of
things
that
help
support
this
we
are,
we
will
put
whatever
dollars
are
necessary
to
pull
down.
P
Federal
earmarks
to
help
support
this
project
and
front
to
the
money,
meaning
that
can't
be
used
for
something
else,
but
having
some
sort
of
mechanism
to
recapture
some
of
that
over
a
period
of
time.
I
think
that's
appropriate
in
order
to
stretch
these
dollars
to
have
the
biggest
benefit
necessary
to
impact
impact.
The
sewer
infrastructure
of
beer,
so
I
would
say
that
I
don't
know
if
anyone
else
has
anything
else
to
say.
O
O
Yeah
they
contribute
so
the
way
we
could
cost
in
a
water
and
sewer
system
is
by
connection
charges
and
also
by
user
fees
and
connection
charges
are
in
the
neighborhood
about
3
500
in
Oakland,
County
and
Genesee
County,
and
so
we
get
that
as
capital
charge.
O
That
goes
back
into
the
system
to
pay
debt
basically,
and
so
the
the
concern
that
I
have
with
increasing
that
that,
because
that's
how
we
would
pay
back
and
give
this
money,
the
concern
I
have
is
that
you
get
to
a
point
where
that
cost
becomes
so
great
to
pay
all
the
debt
that
it
it
it.
The
project
falls
apart
right.
O
You
can't
you
can't
charge
someone
more
than
it
costs
to
build
a
septic
system
to
connect
to
sewer
right
because
they're
going
to
build
a
septic
system
instead,
so
that
that's
kind
of
the
concern
is
I.
Don't
want
to
make
that
cost
too
high
where
people
it's
prohibitive
for
people
to
connect
in,
but
at
the
same
time
you
know
it
yeah.
E
So
I
had
a
couple
of
questions
and
just
a
comment:
I
too
have
concern
about
sprawl
and
I
mean
I
live
in
Novi,
okay,
when
I
moved
here
there
was
a
poster
that
was
the
M5
connection
that
went
nowhere.
Do
you
remember
that,
because
you
were
working
out
there
right,
I
moved
into
a
brand
new
neighborhood
I
admit
it
right.
We
didn't
have
water
at
the
time
and
I'm
still
on
a
well
because
I
never
hooked
up.
I!
Look
at
what's
going
on
west
of
me,
oh
my
gosh
right!
So
sprawl
happened.
E
E
The
restrictions
to
unfettered
growth
in
that
area
is
really
important
to
me.
The
parks
up
there,
you
know,
are
also
important,
and
how
does
that
fit
into
all
of
this,
and
do
we
have
to
pay
to
be
part
of
the
system
as
part
of
the
parks
or,
let's
flip,
that
around
and
can
the
parks
be
accommodated
separately
and
you
know
as
a
benefit
to
us.
I,
don't
know
so
that's
a
question
that
I
would
have
and
then
also
ringtone.
E
The
third
question
I
have
is:
are
the
communities
matching
at
all,
or
is
this
just
us
and
the
FEDS.
O
So
the
communities
themselves
have
budgets
under
a
million
dollars,
there's
a
lot
of
money
to
them.
They've
put
in
200
000
total
amongst
the
four
of
them
and
they
have
contributed
in
that
way.
O
O
So
the
more
we
get
back
in
the
system,
the
more
we
can
do
to
fix
the
system
later
on
when
it's
needed.
I'm
sorry
I
lost
your
question.
Well,.
E
I
just
was
wondering
about
the
match
from
the
local
communities,
because
it
I
think
it's
important
to
have
skin
in
the
game.
I
really
do.
O
Well,
they
provided
200
000,
that's
a
lot
for
them,
but
you
know
it
if
you
think
of
it,
it's
an
opportunity
that
we're
never
going
to
have
again
to
do
something
to
have
sewer
available,
we're
not
building
it
yet
we're
just
making
it
available,
and
this
will
never
happen
again.
We'll
never
have
this
opportunity
again.
N
O
Do
you
have
if
I
can,
how
far
thank
you
regarding
Equity
I
just
wanted
to
point
out.
Our
office
has
been
doing
a
lot
as
it
relates
to
underserved
communities
or
substantially
burdened
communities,
and
in
the
past
three
years
we've
acquired
17
million
dollars
in
free
funds
through
the
state
for
the
for
Pontiac
and
for
Royal
Township.
Those
funds
are
100
principal
forgiveness
and
they're,
available
to
communities
that
are
underserved
or
significantly
overburdened.
Those
monies
are
not
available
to
everybody
else.
It's
a
loan.
It's
like
a
90
10..
O
You
have
to
pay
90,
you
get
10
forgiveness,
so
they
have
a
lot
more
opportunities:
the
underserved,
because
there
it's
a
focus
and
everyone's
aware
of
the
problems
and
we're
working
on
fixing
those
and
the
state's
been
very
great
about
giving
us
free
money
to
do
that.
I
can't
get
free
money
to
build
this
project
unless
I
come
to
you
guys.
B
J
You,
madam
chair,
so
I
I,
don't
mean
to
push
back
on
you
Dave,
but
I
do
remember
that
we
had
this
conversation
about
Grant,
not
Grant
can
I.
My
understanding
when
we
agreed
is
that
we
weren't
going
to
do
that.
We
were
just
gonna,
give
him
the
money
and
then
we'll
work
through
it
and
figure
it
out,
because
the
connection
that
was
my
understanding
the
last
time
we
voted
on
that
and
we
weren't
going
to
do
that
because
just
the
area
and
I'd
understand
because
they
should
have
done
stuff
a
long
time
ago.
J
So
and
that's
where
I
remember,
having
a
conversation
with
Melissa
slacken
too.
N
When
we
went
to
the
executive
back
in
I
want
to
say
August
of
last
year,
I
think
we
met
with,
and
the
congresswoman
had
some
of
her
folks
there
and-
and
we
went
through
all
of
this-
and
it
was
really
kind
of
we
went
through
a
very
deep
detail
to
to
come
to
where
we
are,
and
it
was
just.
N
It
was
agreed
by
everybody
at
that
point
that
it
would
be
best
to
do
this
as
a
grant
and
again,
as
as
Brian
said,
we're
going
to
be
looking
for,
and
we've
already
had
good
luck
with
bringing
in
these
kind
of
grants
for
the
low-income
communities.
A
big
chunk
is
this
is
set
aside
for
low-income
communities,
so
we
really
need
to
continue
doing
that.
N
But,
as
Brian
said
also,
this
is
these
communities,
don't
directly
qualify
for
that
side
of
it,
so
whatever
they
do
put
in
and
they
will
be
putting
in
money.
This
is
going
to
be
120
million
dollar
project
all
together.
So
this
is
significant
funding
from
the
of
all
the
people
in
that
area
that
they'll
be
putting
in
for
this.
So
this
is,
this
will
be
shared.
P
So
so
I
mean
clear:
I
mean
I.
Think
that
there
has
been
conversation
should
be
Grant
or
not
Grand,
that
this
body
never
agreed
to
Grant
or
not
Grant,
and
we
agreed
to
set
the
money
aside
and
even
in
conversation
with
the
executive,
we'll
figure
that
out
as
we
go
forward,
what
happened
along
the
way
and
I
don't
I
mean
I,
I'm,
incredibly
frustrated,
because
when
an
opportunity
to
kind
of
settle
that
question,
a
decision
was
made
and
contracts
were
negotiated
with
local
communities
as
just
a
grant.
P
The
executive,
fully
will
know,
is
of
like
some
concern
that
I
mean
this
board.
An
individuals
has
or
looking
at
what
all
the
ways
to
do
that
we
talked
about.
There
are
six
thousand
hookups,
I
mean
and
I
think
there
is
like
a
math
problem
like
replacing
septic
or
stick
with
septic
systems
that
are
not
as
efficient
and
everything.
If
that's
that's,
measurably
cheaper
than
this
I
mean
other
stuff
that
people
will
go
that
route.
We
won't
do
it.
P
First
and
foremost,
the
dollars
have
to
be
put
up
now
to
be
able
to
make
it
happen,
and
so
I
think
that
that's
where
the
agreement
was,
which
is
why
we
didn't
appropriate
the
dollars.
We
said
that
we
basically
said
this.
Money
cannot
be
used
for
anything
else.
10
million
dollars
is
set
aside
these
this
agreement,
just
recently
I,
think,
have
been
like
approved
with
each
individual
Community
and
despite
efforts
at
the
drain,
Board
of
being
I
mean
being
on
a
regular
basis.
When
are
we
going
to
talk
about
this?
P
When
are
we
going
to
talk
about
this
in
just
a
matter
a
few
weeks
ago?
Now
we're
going
to
talk
about
this,
but
it
looks
like
decisions
have
already
been
made.
Ultimately,
the
decision,
the
decision
comes
with
this
appropriated
body
and
so
I
mean
I've
I've
brought
some
of
my
frustration
to
the
executive
office
by
how
and
when
and
why,
without
a
decision.
P
P
Like
show
me
every
scenario
that's
available
to
be
able
to
do
this
recognizing
some
of
it
would
have
to
be
grand
because
there's
just
I
mean
10
million
dollars
to
recoup
on
top
of
other
Financial
Obligations
long
term
is
a
lot,
but
if
you
I
mean
an
average
of
35
100
hook
up
tacking
on
500
to
be
recaptured
to
work
for
other
gray.
Green
infrastructure
doesn't
stop
a
project
for
me
from
happening
from
a
sound
public
policy.
P
P
We
have
record
opportunities
with
the
bipartisan
infrastructure
Bill
signed
by
President
Biden
that
helps
make
more
dollars
available.
I
mean
the
reason
why
I
mean
this
community.
This
community
is
financially
better
off
than
some
of
these
other
commands.
That's
why
they're
earning
wise,
lower
income
communities
are
eligible
for
some
of
these
other
dollars,
and
it's
still
not
enough
money.
P
I
think
the
case
has
been
made
of
the
environmental
concern.
Like
we
mentioned
already
that
I
I
do
have
some
sprawl
concern.
We
have
other
gray
infrastructure,
septic
tank
infrastructure
needs
and
thinking
strategically
long
term
how
to
do
this
and
how
all
communities
pay
their
fair
share
and
again,
as
a
county
I
think.
The
county
has
been
incredibly
generous
of
putting
up
some
of
the
preliminary
planning
dollars
that
I
know
again.
News
had
the
option
to
use
some
of
those
dollars.
P
I
know
I
mean
I've
signed
some
of
those
contracts
already
that
we
set
up
I
want
to
say
we
said
2.5
million
dollars
aside
to
help
all
communities
across
Oakland
County
do
some
of
this
and
they
they've
taken
on
some
of
the
match
of
that
putting
I
mean
making
sure
that
technique.
Yes,
10
million
is
up,
but
I
mean
the
hookup
fee,
largely
on
the
business
side.
P
It
to
me
is
not
an
unreasonable
consideration
to
say:
oh
yeah,
you
got
to
put
you
got
to
put
some
back
into
the
pot
so
that
we
can
actually
do
this
other
places,
and
so
some
of
this
you'll
hear
them
it's
my.
It
comes
out
of
frustration
that
that
conversation
should
have
been
clearly
done
because
it
was
coming.
I
mean
I
mean
that
that
wasn't
resolved
and
I
think
it
I
mean
I,
think
it's
appropriate.
P
So
so
with
that
I'm
going
to
propose
like
an
amendment
that
I
mean
looking
at
five,
a
five
hundred
dollars.
I
mean
whenever
it
comes
appropriate,
a
500
assessment
on
top
of
the
hookup
to
to
be
recaptured
to
the
county,
to
be
exclusively
used
for
great
infrastructure.
B
I
gotta
get
my
Robert's
book
out,
supported
it
so
weakers.
B
Yours,
thank
you.
So
then
we
can
hear
from
commissioner
Johnson
commissioner
Ramen
commissioner
wiper
and
commissioner
long
in
that
order.
Yeah.
C
C
Yeah
I
have
seen
sprawl
I.
It
is
bad.
We
should
be
building
more
density
in
less
space
as
much
as
possible.
However,
and
I
don't
want
to
sound
like
a
NIMBY
here
but
like,
but
I
think
that's
I
think
that's
the
sweet
spot
for
doing
Flawless
infrastructure
because
it
is
in
the
middle
of
the
Flint
area
and
it's
definitely
not
Metro
Detroit
Metro
Detroit
ends
well
before
that
area
and
I.
C
B
You
Brendan
I
mean
commissioner
Johnson.
That
was
quite
profound
commissioner
Ramen
you're
next.
D
Thank
you,
I'm
sure
to
chair
Woodward's
point.
You
know,
I
agree
with
with
pretty
much
everything
he
said.
My
question
to
the
group
at
this
point
is:
do
we
have
the
option
to
table
the
discussion?
I,
don't
know
what
our
time
frame
is
to
move
forward
with
this
right,
I
mean
clearly
clearly
the
need
is
there
and
I
understand
that.
Do
we
have
I
mean
even
if
we're
at
the
11th
Hour,
do
we
have
one
hour
to
put
a
pause
on
this.
Look
at
what
our
recapture
options
could
be.
D
I
know
you've
already
moved
forward
with
proposing
an
amendment
and
so
be
it.
If
that's
what
we
decide
to
go
forward
with,
but
I
just
don't
know
if
it's
worth
taking
our
time
in
due
diligence
to
go
not
fully
back
to
the
drawing
board,
but
maybe
to
a
point
where
we
decide
hey
look.
This
plan
is
great.
Maybe
we
need
to
modify
it
slightly,
so
we
have
some
recapture
dollars
to
put
back
into
the
into
the
pot
to
fix
all
the
other
gray
areas
that
your
Woodward
was
talking
about.
O
Regarding
the
recapture
of
the
repayment
dollars,
we
covered
this
with
commissioner
Woodward
on
Friday
with
our
drainage
district
attorney.
The
petitions,
as
submitted
by
the
communities,
do
not
offer
any
form
of
repayment
or
any
form
of
apportionment,
so
we
don't
have
a
percentage
to
build
them
on
it
and
so
I
I'm
concerned
without
a
clean
approval,
it's
going
to
mess
up
the
drainage,
District
petition
process
and
put
us
back
several
months,
which
means
we
may
miss
the
opportunity
to
take.
O
G
H
B
I
P
Keep
if
I'm
getting
dressed
yeah,
so
whatever
the
fee
for
hookup,
the
3
500
I,
think
like
an
average
hookup
for
you,
so
whatever
the
hookup
fee
that's
necessary.
This
would
be
this
would
tack
on
an
additional
amount
and
like
500,
just
look
at
that
fair
enough
and
frankly,
it
doesn't
have
to
be
paid
like
immediately.
P
So
yes,
yes,
okay,
so,
but
whatever
the
the
hook
up
for
you
and
the
reality
is
the
hookup
he
might
be
more
because
there's
still
tremendous
phase,
two
and
phase
three
is
I
mean
tremendous,
and
so
it
might
be
more
based
on
whatever
Grant
I've
come
back,
but
I
do
want
to
also
speak.
To
I
mean
this
notion
of
studies.
I
mean
back
some
time
to
their
agreements.
I
mean
at
any
time
make
agreements
can
be
I
mean
renegotiating
made
it
happen.
Also,
Genesee
County
does
want
us
to
be
part.
P
P
It
is
I
mean
from
a
equity
issue,
a
conversation
about
like
what's
important
to
make
sure
the
consideration
issues
I
mean
I,
think
it's
appropriate
just
interesting.
What
the
will
of
the
group
is
I.
I
I
Is
the
cost
the
cost
you're
not
making
any
money
on
the
35
you're
guessing
3500
right
now,
you're,
estimating
3500
100
hookup?
That
is
not
making
a
profit
to
put
any
money
away.
That
is
actual
cost
for
the
homeowner
to
hook
in
correct,
correct,
okay
and
then.
I
O
If
I
was
the
community,
I
wouldn't
sign
not
knowing
what
my
future
obligation
is
right,
it
opens
the
door
to
the
non-known.
The
communities
are
very
sensitive
because
of
the
cost
of
the
project
and
their
limited
budgets.
They
don't
want
to
bankrupt
themselves
right
so
they're
being
very
guarded
and
very
careful
with
how
they
proceed
in
any
unknowns,
makes
this
less
easy
for
them
to
go
forward
right.
It's
the
right
thing
to
do.
We
all
agree,
it's
the
right
thing
to
do
it's
just.
O
How
do
we
get
there
and
the
concern
that
I
have?
Is
you
know
the
drainage
board
on
which
commissioner
Markham
and
commissioner
Woodward
sit
on
is
the
body
that
makes
the
the
charges,
the
fees,
everything
for
the
drainage
district
and
so
there's
an
opportunity
in
the
future.
To
recap:
costs
that
way,
while
still
allowing
this
to
go
forward.
O
It's
a
Bald
Eagle
Lake
in
Lake
Louise
in
Brandon.
The
bands
are
concerns.
Those
are
pretty
large,
like
yeah
they're,
pretty
large
yeah.
They
just
turns
into
Kearsley
Creek
and
discharge
where
Kearsley
Creek,
which
is
the
Flint
River.
Oh.
I
Okay,
that's
what
you
were
saying:
Flynn,
okay,
because
I
I
really
am
I'm
passionate
about
getting
the
Lake
homes
on
off
of
that
septic.
So
that
is
one
issue
that
I
think
that
would
resolve
because
I
I
know-
and
you
know
that
that
drainage
from
those
old
septics
and
then
people
build
those
big
house.
I
know
they
get
engineer
Wells,
because
I
get
a
lot
of
calls.
I
You
guys
get
a
lot
from
Commerce
I'm
sure
because
they
can't
afford
to
hook
up
and
they're
crying
on
the
phone
to
me-
and
you
know,
but
you
know
so,
I
realize
those
old
septics
I
make
that's
very
important.
One
issue
very
important
to
me
is
to
get
those
septics
off
those
lake
property,
those
old
subjects,
they're
old
ones
too,
and
a
lot
of
the
Lakes.
So
all
right.
Thank
you.
I'm
good
for
now,
I.
B
I
want
to
allow
the
chair
to,
of
course,
bookend,
but
commercial
Ramen
I
know
you
have
your
hand
raised
and
then
we'll
go
to
the
chair.
Yeah.
D
Absolutely
just
a
quick
question
kind
of
in
contemplate
in
contemplation
of
the
amendment.
What
does
a
septic
field
run?
If
somebody
wanted
to
put
that
just
so,
we
have
somebody
500
7
500..
So
if
we're
talking,
3,
500,
plus
or
minus
500,
we're
still
economically
advantageous
to.
O
P
What
the
average
cost
is
right
and
it's
and
I
think
it's
important
when
we
think
so
there's
a
there's
like
three
things
that
I
may
have
a
few
things
so
I
mean
address
commissioner
Ramen
at
a
point:
there's
a
cost
to
hook
up,
and
now
you
have
a
monthly
bill
for
the
rest
of
time.
So,
like
that's,
I
mean
that
goes
into
the
drain.
District
too,
which
is
with
the
septic
system.
You
don't
you
have
like
the
maintenance
and
other
types
of
stuff.
So
it's
like
that
stuff.
P
This
doesn't
address
all
the
septic
tanks
around.
That
Lake
like
this
is
only
five
percent
of
the
land
mass.
It's
along
these
commercial
corridors,
those
all
of
them
on
the
lake
Oh
Come
completely
around
the
lights.
P
Okay,
yeah,
that's
in
the
five
percent.
Okay,
in
terms
of
like
this
question,
am
I
from
a
predictability
point
of
view,
I
think
it's
being
very
clear
that,
like
this
I
mean
this,
is
a
cost
not
expected
to
be
borne
by
the
local
communities
to
be
exclusively
borne
by
the
people
who
hook
up
and
that
so
in
terms
of
certainty
that
can
be
done,
because
if
I
was
a
community
to
put
the
burden,
I
have
to
do
this,
I
mean
we
are
I
mean
creative.
P
There
are
I,
mean
creative
legal
ways
to
be
able
to
do
this.
If
Brian
brought
up
a
good
point
and
and
did
definitely
I
spent
like
the
weekend,
like
thinking
through
scenarios
setting
rates
to
be
able
to
recapture
some
of
this
money,
we
say
recapture
it
any
of
those
dollars
that
get
captured
through
a
rate
process
has
to
be
used
exclusively
in
that
drain,
District,
where
it
was
captured.
So
it
would
not
be
to
I
mean
commission
along.
It
would
not
be
available
to
be
deployed
out
inside
the
dream,
district
and
I.
P
But
in
order
for
us
to
have
the
latitude
and
flexibility
to
kind
of
make
capture,
I
mean
some
of
this
money
back
to
be
redeployed
for
other
gray.
Infrastructure
needs
around
the
county
that
doing
it
through
rates
through
a
specific
drain.
District
there's
statutory
limitations
that
those
dollars
could
only
be
used
in
that
area,
and
there
might
be
some
value
for
that.
P
K
I
I
waited
I,
don't
know
if
I'm
in
order,
so
when
and
you
Dave
are
on
that
drainage
just
so
that
brought
up
a
good
point.
If
this
passed
with
no
500,
can
you
guys
set
up
a
thesis
system
that
way
after
it's
in
motion?
I
just
spoke
to
that,
though,.
P
I
think
you
were
thinking
if
we
do
that
and
I
think
there's
a
way
to
do,
I
mean
the
set
rates
to
do
things.
Those
dollars
can
only
be
used
in
the
drain.
Districts
cannot
be
used
for
other
places,
so.
I
P
As
a
a
a
partial
recapture
of
this
big
10
million
dollars,
then
in
theory-
yes,
that
then
could
be
deployed
in
other
places.
P
Amend
this
to
require
five
hundred
dollars,
a
additional
500
for
hookup
fee
to
be
to
to
be
used
exclusively
for
other
County
infrastructure.
Okay,.
M
O
We've
already
received
the
petitions
from
the
communities
and
it
doesn't
say
anything
about
it.
So,
under
the
drain,
the
drainage
code,
we
have
to
have
specific
language
in
the
petition
to
support
what
the
communities
are
doing
to
tell
the
dreams
District.
What
to
do
that
language
is
not
in
there
and
it
would
have
to
be
a
petition
and
I'd
have
to
go.
A
E
So
back
on
the
county
parks
that
are
up
there
and
how
they
fit
into
this,
and.
N
Q
E
I'm,
you
know:
okay,
it's
County
money,
it's
County,
Parks,
I'm
kind
of
good
with
that,
but
again
it's
all
up
there,
I
guess:
I,
don't
have
a
real
point:
I
just
I'm,
not
seeing
that
the
county
parks
are
being
advantaged
in
this
at
all
or
getting
some
relief
for
having
to
pay
to
hook
up
or
any
of
that,
that's
what
I'm
really
looking
for.
Can
the
county
parks
do
this
for
free,
so
the.
O
E
Where
I'm
I'm,
confused
and
maybe
I
should
be
smarter,
because
I
am
on
the
drain
board,
but
I
am
not
clear
on
what
we
have
to
do
today
and
what
we
can
still
do
to
try
to
capture
some
of
this
money
at
the
level
of
the
drain
board
and
forgive
my
naivete
but
yeah.
This
is
complicated
and
I'm,
not
clear
I.
P
Mean
just
to
address
that
point,
so
this
is
about
appropriating
the
money.
We
set
the
money
aside,
appropriate
the
money
for
this
project.
The
drain
board
I
believe
still
has
to
accept
the
petition
and
sign
the
agreement.
So
in
theory
the
the
dream
board
could
put
this
type
of
requirement.
Next
Tuesday
next
Tuesday,
maybe
so
I
mean
outside
of
you.
N
Still
have
to
be
redone
all
the
petitions,
it's
for
me
phone.
P
Calls
it's
four
meetings,
and
so
I
mean
and
I
guess
this
notion
about,
like
we're
kind
of
like
got
a
gun
to
our
head,
but
we
have
a
bad
analogy,
but
it's
a
that.
This
is
something
that's
born
on
the
hookup
side.
So
there's
a
way
to
restructure
that
I.
Don't
I
mean
this
notion
like
how
how
dare
like
the
the
business,
have
to
be
required
to
contribute
to
the
common
good
of
addressing
drain
infrastructure
across
and
again
I'm
just
going
to
remind
people
10
million
dollars.
P
I
is
the
largest
infrastructure
allocation
of
arpa
dollars
for
any
project
in
the
county.
I,
don't
think
it's
unreasonable
and
gifting
equivalent
of
seven
million
dollars
is
not
only
more
than
generous.
That's
on
top
of
the
other
planning
monies
and
I
believe
we
have
to
allocate
it's
I
mean
for
the
the
for
the
Congressional
earmark.
We
have
to
take
general
fund
dollars
because
arpa
dollars
cannot
be
used
for
the
the
match
respectively.
P
I
A
lot
yes,
it
is
so
I
am
wondering.
Is
there
a
rush
on
this?
If
we,
if
we
could
post
I
I,
don't
feel
comfortable
voting
on
a
500
fee,
I,
don't
know
where
commissioner
Woodward
got
his
number
I
think
you
know
I
think
he
even
said
you
pulled
that
out
of
your
hat.
If
you
had
a
hat
well,
I
did
quick
math
right,
quick
man,
so
I
don't
feel
comfortable.
I
think
you've
worked
on
this
deal
for
a
year
and
a
half
three
years,
oh
three
years.
So
that's
even
worse.
I
I
personally
comfortable
voting
on
an
amendment
that
I
don't
know
like
if
it's
going
to
ruin
the
whole
all
their
work,
that
they
did
for
at
least
a
year
and
a
half
three
years,
they're
saying
I,
just
wonder
if
we
could
postpone
it
two
weeks
and
then
Dave
could
talk
to
you
and
you
know
I,
don't
know
I'm
going
to
make
a
motion
to
postpone
it
if
it
wouldn't
ruin
their
timeline.
I'm
afraid
this
is
going
to
pass
this
amendment
and
blow
the
whole
deal.
I
don't
want
to
blow
your
whole
deal.
I
I
think
that
that
sewer
are
very
much
needed
out
there
with
all
those
Lakes
I,
just
don't
feel
comfortable
I,
don't
know,
I'd
need
more
information
really
I.
Think
like
when
said,
commissioner
Markham,
it's
just
a
lot,
this
drainage,
the
suit
you
know
the
sewer
stuff
is
a
lot
for
all
of
us
to
understand
it's
different,
so
I
would
make
a
motion
if
we
could
to
postpone
for
to
the
next
econ
meeting.
I
P
Mr
chair
did
you
have
something
I
I
would
maybe
encourage
if
we
just
put
on
the
amendment,
because
we
are
on
a
timeline
to
appropriate
these
dollars.
F
O
Hands
appropriate
it
now,
we've
paid
it
within
the
next
year.
N
P
It
appropriate
yes,
I
would
like
us
to
be
able
to
get
this
money
appropriated
by
our
next
board
meeting.
If
we
have
to
make
adjustments
to
the
amendment
as
we
go
forward,
so
be
it.
That
would
be
my
recommend
not
to
postpone
so
that
we
can
get
the
money
appropriated.
B
D
Well,
so
I
go
back
to
my
first
point
that
I
made
earlier
right.
It's
all
about
timeline,
I
appreciate
that
you've
spent
three
years
and
I'm
sure
there's
a
lot
of
time
and
hard
work
and
we're
not
trying
to
to
negate
any
of
that.
But
at
the
same
time
you
know
this
whole
kind
of
gun
to
your
head
that
hey
look.
We
have
to
decide
today,
I'm,
just
not
a
huge
fan
of
this
I
mean
they've
done
three
years
worth
of
work.
D
Why
are
we
in
60
minutes
making
a
decision
for
10
million
dollars
saying
that
we're
out
of
time?
Well,
that's
not
my
fault
that
we're
out
of
time.
I
was
just
brought
into
this
conversation
60
minutes
ago.
So,
with
all
due
respect
to
everybody
at
the
table,
I'm
I'm
just
not
comfortable
with
this
decision
either.
Thank.
B
You
for
your
your
comments
there,
commissioner
Miller
yeah.
J
So
I
apologize
if
it
seemed
like
I
wasn't
paying
attention.
I
was
I,
got
two
hamsters
so
reading
the
resolution.
I
was
looking
that
up
from
the
last
time
and
because
I'm,
a
man
of
my
word
so
I
want
to
make
sure
what
I'm
saying
is
correct,
and
it
says
in
here
in
the
resolution.
If
you
don't
mind
me
Madam
chair,
please,
it
says
the
Water
Resource
Commission
shall
seek
to
apply
for
other
appropriate
sources
of
federal
and
state
funds
that
could
be
utilized
to
offset
the
ten
thousand
dollars.
J
It
says:
I
said
before
that
says
that
the
appropriation
by
the
board,
Commissioners
and
subsequent
release
of
funds
for
the
project
is
continuing
to
an
execution
of
an
agreement
between
Genesee
County
and
the
District
of
the
sewer
capacity
as
we
got
here
is
this
is
using
ARP
money.
Local
recovery
funds
shall
not
out
not
obligate
commitment
of
Oakland
County's
general
fund.
J
The
district
shall
meet
all
federal
state
and
local
legal
requirements,
so
it
doesn't
say
anything
here
about
having
like
them
pay
and
that's
what
I
remember
so
I'm
just
going
about
what
I,
remember
and
I
want
to
make
sure
if
I
was
wrong,
spells
wrong.
I,
admit
it.
So
that's
where
I
like
it
says
that
the
Water
Resource
commissioner
will
go
out
to
get
recovery
funds,
not
us
doing
that.
That's
the
way!
I
read
that
yeah.
P
Clarification
that
the
WRC
will
get
help
work
out,
get
other
grants
to
help
make
this
project
go
right,
but
it
says
that
release
of
these
funds
will
be
appropriated
by
the
board
contingent
on
whatever
agreement
that
we
sent.
That
just
I
mean
that's
normal
Appropriations
language
that
we
have
the
authority
to
be
able
to
do
that,
and
it
was
always
part
of
I
mean
there
was
a
conversation
this
it
does
not
say
it
will
be
gifted.
J
Look
I'm
just
saying
it
says:
it'll
be
like
we
will
like
re
release
the
funds
when
a
agreement
is
executed
between
Genesee
County
and
the
district
for
the
sewer
capacity,
and
that
hasn't
happened.
Yet
that's
what
I'm
saying
it
doesn't
say
us!
That's
right!
That's
I'm!
Just
reading
what
it
says!
Well,.
P
B
C
I'm
sorry,
madam
chair
yeah
Mike,
my
question
is
kind
of
to
Dave
is,
is
your
thought
I
understand
the
nature
of
this
is
unique
because
it's
Harper
money,
but
would
a
a
with
this,
like
hypothetical
future
fund
for
gray
infrastructure
across
the
county?
Would
it
in
the
future
maybe
be
also
fed
by
a
500
search
Arch
on
connection
fees
from
elsewhere
in
the
county?
Perhaps
the
entire
company.
P
In
general
and
Brian
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
that
any
fee
that's
charged
like
on
a
district
has
to
stay
within
the
district
if
it's
generated
through
the
district,
this
would
make
this
different.
I
mean
is
that
this
is
money
coming
from
outside
the
district
into
the
district
and
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
recapture
some
of
that
money.
So
I
would
say
any
scenario
like
that.
P
I
D
O
Days
they've
been
waiting
for
us,
you
know
and
I've
been
negotiating
the
agreement
and
trying
to
get
that
all
set.
P
O
O
Attorney
I
mean
I,
did
I
honestly
didn't
think
there
was
going
to
be
this
much
discussion
about
it.
I'm
sorry,
I
I
didn't
try
to
bring
this
on
anybody.
I
didn't
I'm,
not
trying
to
put
anybody
against
a
wall
and
say:
do
it
I'm
just
saying
from
a
timeline
perspective,
we've
been
we've
been
moving
forward
in
a
steady
rate
completely
and-
and
this
would
just
be.
C
O
So
the
particular
again
I
say
the
petitions
did
not
include
any
repayment
right.
So
there's
nothing
in
the
communities
and
did
not
petition
for
any
repayment.
So
I
have
to
go
back
to
the
community
in
petitioned
them
to
include
the
repayment.
Had
it
been
in
the
motion.
Originally
I
probably
would
have
made
sure
something
was
in
there.
Yeah
I
thought
repayment
was
the
option,
but
it's
not
in
the
motion.
N
Also
by
residential
unit
right,
it's
so
you
know,
the
bigger
facilities
will
have
dozens
of
residential
units
so
that
500
per
residential
unit
could
be
tens
of
thousands
more
dollars.
And
so
again
some
of
the
some
of
the
businesses
might
just
say:
well,
we'll
just
move
to
Genesee
and
that's
what
I've
heard
from
the
beginning
is
Genesis.
Just
up
the
road
and
they'd
be
happy
to
have
him
there,
so
we
could
lose
some
of
these
businesses
that
have
been
there
for
many
years
and
I
mean
that's
just
I.
J
Infrastructure,
yes,
so
is
that
is
it
specifically
for
everybody
or
is
it
new,
is
for
the
hookup
in
this
train
District
right
for
everybody,
so
we're
all
like
this
example.
If
they're
seniors,
they
can't
afford
it.
That's
what
we
had
I
remember
this
conversation
with
before
yeah.
B
Whatever,
but
it's
like
who's,
the
veto,
great
well
I
mean
not
great,
but
the
motion
failed.
Everybody,
okay,
which
takes
us
to
the
original
motion
of
ABCD.
E
Yes,
Madam,
chair
I
would
just
like
to
make
sort
of
a
philosophical
statement
before
we
go
ahead
and
vote.
I
agree
with
the
chair.
The
the
board
is
the
a
property
that
appropriates
the
funding
and
so
for
it
to
get
this
far
without
you
know,
having
a
discussion
at
this
level
created
this
problem
and
let's
hope
that
doesn't
happen
again.
E
There's
a
couple
of
times
since
I've
been
Finance
chair
that
stuff
has
sorted
just
kind
of
like.
Oh,
you
have
to
approve
this,
no
I,
don't
you
know,
so,
let's
be
better
about
doing
that
and
I
think
that
gray
infrastructure
and
green
infrastructure
throughout
the
county
I'm
pointing
to
you
guys
and
even
you,
because
in
your
districts
we
have
a
lot
of
problem
with
this
and
we
don't
have
any
way
to
pay
to
fix
it
and
your
community
isn't
happy
with
the
residents
having
to
cough
up
cash
either.
E
So,
let's
think
about
this
and
be
strategic
going
forward,
but
that's
I'm
I'm
going
to
support
the
motion
because
yeah
I
think
we
have
to
or
I
have
to
anyway,
but
I
don't
like
the
way
it
played
out.
I
felt
blindsided
and,
as
chair
of
Finance
I
mean
I'm
supposed
to
pay
attention
to
this
stuff
and
I
feel
kind
of
stupid.
So
I'm.
B
F
I
B
I
guess
we'll
see
you
back
at
finance
and
hopefully
not
this
long
of
a
yeah
all
right.
Let's
go
on
to
item
e
under
the
regular
agenda,
which
is
veteran
services
fiscal
year,
24
County,
Veterans,
Services
fund,
Grant
application
I'll
take
a
motion
to
open
that
buy
wiper
supported
by
Ramen,
and
certainly
we
appreciate
your
patience.
I
saw
you
over
there.
You've
learned
more
than
you
ever
wanted
to
learn
today.
Didn't
you
yeah?
Is
it
Tyrone?
Yes,
could
you
tell
me
your
last
name,
Jordan
Jordan
I
thought
so.
Okay
welcome
both
of
you.
M
Veteran
services,
digital
marketing
and
Communications
coordinator,
so
he's
gonna,
be
the
project
manager
for
this
grant.
If
it's
approved,
so
we're
requesting
approval
from
the
board
of
board
to
submit
our
application
for
the
fiscal
year.
24
County
veterans
service
fund
Grant
the
allocation
from
the
Michigan
Veterans
Affairs
Agency
for
Oakland
County
this
year
is
500
or
5019.
M
Last
year's
funding
was
255
319
we're
proposing
allocating
those
dollars
toward
270
000
towards
our
veterans,
resource
fairs
that
allows
us
to
buy
the
Meyer
vouchers
and
also
seventy
five
thousand
dollars
in
Pro
fresh
protein
and
fruits
and
vegetables
through
Gleaners
that'll.
Allow
us
to
have
eight
to
ten
of
those
resource
fairs
throughout
the
county.
Hopefully
you
have
been
able
to
attend
one
of
those
or
at
least
seen
where
we've
been
having
them
throughout
the
county
and
they've
been
a
tremendous
success.
M
We
average
about
200
250
Veterans
for
each
one
of
those
and
the
Meyer
vouchers
allow
them
to
purchase
things
besides.
They
can
certainly
purchase
food,
but
they
can
also
use
it
to
purchase
items
toothbrushes,
toothpaste,
things
like
that,
the
so
again
we
want
to
continue
that
successful
program.
M
We
also
have
allocated
159
000
towards
marketing,
which
allows
us
to
get
out
the
word
about
the
services
that
we
provide
also
allows
us
to
promote
the
veterans
resource
fairs
and
the
goal
of
the
County
veterans
service
fund
Grant
is
to
try
and
get
veterans
connected
to
Federal
benefits
to
get
them
into
our
office.
So
with
the
veterans
resource
fairs,
we
have
a
wide
variety
of
resources,
including
ourselves
that
actually
can
file
claims
and
do
things
like
that.
M
We've
also
are
proposing
an
allocation
of
seventy
thousand
dollars
towards
Transportation,
which
we're
expanding
the
program
this
year.
If
it's
approved
by
the
Michigan
Veterans
Affairs
agency
to
include
trip
this
year,
we've
we're
Limited
in
allowing
people
to
get
to
the
different
offices,
so
we're
proposing
to
be
able
to
use
it
for
non-va
medical
appointments,
shopping
trips.
Things
like
that,
so
I.
M
D
With
commissioner
Ramen
thank
you
manager.
Thank
you.
I'm
fully
in
support
of
this
I
think
this
is
a
great
program
that
you
offer
I've
been
to
a
couple
of
them
now
and
I.
Think
it's
remarkable
one
question
that
I
do
have
is
I
noticed
that
159
000
she
mentioned
for
marketing
again
I'm
a
late
person,
so
I
apologize
for
the
naive
question,
but
that
just
seems
to
me
to
be
quite
a
bit
of
money
from
marketing.
D
Could
that
money
be
better
used
for
what
we're
trying
to
do
for
veterans?
I,
just
I
know,
that's
the
one
piece
of
it
that
I
wanted
to
get
a
little
bit
of
clarification
of
yeah.
M
We
find
that
again.
If
people
aren't
aware
of
our
services
they're
not
going
to
take
advantage,
you
don't
have
any
way
to
really
the
ba
doesn't
provide
us
with
a
list
of
all
the
veterans
that
live
in
Oakland
County.
The
state
of
Michigan
doesn't
provide
us
with
a
list
of
all
the
veterans
that
reside
now
Oakland
County,
so
we
have
to
use
marketing
means
to
try
and
increase
awareness
and
get
them
into
our
office.
R
M
And
we
try
to
use,
we
understand
that
we
have
a
diverse
population.
We
try
to
make
sure
that
we
reach
out
to
all
you
know
both
agenders
to
different
race
to
different
age
groups.
So
we
do
the
radio,
for
example.
We
try
to
make
sure
that
we
have
you
know
sports
radio
might
attract
a
younger
population,
country
music
might
attract
other
population,
Urban
contemporary,
might
and
attract
another
population.
M
Same
thing
with
you
know
when
we
do
use
paper
advertising
as
a
younger
person,
I,
don't
necessarily
I,
don't
necessarily
get
a
newspaper
or
you
know
know
that
a
lot
of
people
that
do,
but
our
older
population
still
gets
that
newspaper
every
day
and
reads
it
first
thing
in
the
morning
with
their
coffee.
You
know
we
also
want
to
allocate
money
for
social
media
and
direct
mailings
and
digital
media
for
maybe
attracting
a
younger
population.
M
Well,
the
the
yeah
amount
we
received
from
the
state
varies
every
year,
so
this
year
we
had
a
little
bit
less,
but
again
we
went
from
250
000
to
over
500
000
this
year.
So
we
thought
this
was
an
area.
R
Actually,
redoing
the
transportation
piece.
We
really
want
to
know
today
so
that
the
veterans
know
that
this
Transportation
option
is
available
for
them.
J
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
So
do
you
have
any
like
three
by
five
cars
or
any
kind
of
cards
that
we
can
like
so
I?
Have
you
know
spiritual
Legion
in
my
district
drop
off
I'm?
Actually,
a
member
of
the
sons
of
American
Legion.
There
also
is:
are
you
guys
connected
with
helps
to
hard
hats.
M
J
With
who
you
drop
some
off
there
for
sure
yeah,
because
you
know,
we've
had
a
huge
piece
set,
my
my
other
job
as
I'm
flipped,
with
growing
engineers
in
stationary
boilers,
so
we
actually
were
able
to
with
the
trades
to
get
a
there's.
A
director
in
Michigan
now
directly
for
Michigan
right,
just
got
hired
on
I
want
to
say
his
name's
Chris,
so
I'll
get
you
guys
his
number
right.
He
just
got
hired
last
month
for
somebody
to
do
all
the
Outreach
for
Michigan.
Oh.
M
J
E
I
think
the
work
is
great.
I
kind
of
disagree
with
commissioner
Rahman
I
think
spending
as
much
money
as
we
have
to
to
communicate
in
as
many
different
ways
as
we
can
is
important
right
now.
I
have
veterans
in
my
district
Vietnam
vets
that
I've
kind
of
I'm
of
that
vintage.
You
know,
and
so
I've
made
some
friends
and
they
don't
always
know
right.
It's
hard
to
get
to
them.
They're,
not
working
they're,
not
they
don't
get
a
newspaper
they're
they're.
E
A
lot
of
them
live
in
the
mobile
home
parks
in
my
community,
and
so
anything
you
can
do
to
make
it
easier
to
to
communicate.
One
of
the
things
that
I
keep
asking
the
folks
at
the
county
to
do
is
make
it
easy
to
share
on
Facebook,
Twitter,
Instagram
and
so
on.
Give
us
something
if
you
send
me
an
email
or
a
letter
that
doesn't
help
me,
but
a
PDF
I
can
just
pop
and
share
to
my
you
know.
E
World
is
is
much
easier
and
that's
pretty
cheap,
so
I
I
just
want
to
really
encourage
all
different
ways
of
communicating
right
now,
I
think
it's
been
incredibly
successful
and
I
I'm
thrilled
with
this
program.
I
think
it
sets
Oakland
Park
County,
apart
with
really
elevating
our
veterans
in
real,
tangible
ways
and
I
appreciate
all
the
work
that
you're
doing
and
the
Heart
with
which
you
do
it.
So
thank
you.
P
Very
excited
to
see
the
transportation
stuff
I
mean
too,
commissioner
markham's
point
of
view
on
the
market.
You
know
and
I
want
to
speak
professional
Ramen.
Obviously
anything
we
don't
do
in
marketing
that
we
can
do
more
in
program.
It's
got
value
and
this
is
money,
and
frankly,
this
is
larger
than
the
usual
amount
that
we
get.
P
It
seems
like
there's,
some
communities
didn't
spend
their
money,
so
there's
more
money
to
be
had,
which
is
great,
and
we
have
a
plan
to
be
able
to
use
those
resources
from
on
the
communication
front
two
points
and
the
communication
front:
do:
is
there
a
way
and
I
think
I've
asked
this
question
in
directives
before
you've
answered
this?
One
I
can't
remember
the
answer.
M
Had
passed
for
that
repeatedly
and
they
do
not
provide
us
with
any
of
those
that
information
we've
talked
to
and
we're
trying
to
work
with
the
Michigan
Veterans
Affairs
agency
to
maybe
to
get
them
to
provide
work
with
the
secretary
of
state
and
maybe
provide
us
with
anybody
who's
ever
gotten
veterans,
designation
on
the
driver's
license.
No,
and
of
course,
that
would
include
would
not
include
all
veterans,
because
not
all
veterans
get
that
on
their
driver's
license,
but
we're
we've
been
working
with
them,
but
for
unfortunately,
for
privacy
purposes.
M
P
Might
be
worth
I
mean,
so
they
won't
give
us
the
list
or
whatever
they
have.
They
won't
share
that
with
us.
Maybe
there's
a
way
to
say
Hey
what,
if
we
give
you
the
money,
will
you
mail
this
out
on
our
like,
we'll
give
it
to
you?
There's
a
mail
out,
I
mean
gets
it
get
to
the
people
who
are
the
best
I
look
at
some
of
the
broadcast
media
and
I.
Think
I
mean
this.
Is
a
budget.
P
It's
a
I
mean
it's
a
significant
budget,
but
we're
kind
of
broadcasting
to
an
area
larger
than
1.3
million.
To
try
to
zero
in
on
65
000
people
I
mean
so
like
that's
the
and
I
think
I
mean
based
on
what
we
have
and
what
we
can
do.
P
This
is
arguably
the
best
way
to
do
it,
and
just
always
thinking
better,
and
you
have
told
me
that
that
either
they
won't
give
it
or
we
haven't,
figured
out
a
way
to
directly
communicate
to
a
person
and
that's
what's
really
frustrating
that,
like
someone
has
a
list
of
like
there's
a
veteran
that
lives
on
that
street,
they
may
not
want
to
see
the
social
media,
the
newspaper
the
TV
ad,
but
someone
has
an
address
that
could
get
the
information
directly
to
them.
So.
M
M
Think
it's
TransUnion
or
whatever
the
other
large
one
is
actually
have
that
information
where
they
know
whether
you're
veteran
based
on
your
credit
report.
So
the
state
of
Michigan
is
working
with
them
to
try
and
get
that
list
from
the
credit
union
from
the
credit
reporting
agencies,
and
if
they
do
that,
then
they
indicated
they
would
be
willing
to
share
that
with
us.
So
there
is
some
old
school
movement
on
that
in
front.
Well,.
R
To
them
we'll
tell
you
how
many
veterans
are
in
a
particular
zip
code
and
that's
sort
of
how
we
pick
the
locations.
No,
we
have
our
massive
Department
yeah
yeah.
H
P
M
What
smart
acts
as
the
way
we've
got
it
set
up
now,
is
smart
access,
the
coordinating
agency
that
they
work
with
NoDa
any
other
Transportation
student
agency.
So,
for
example,
if
we've
got
a
veteran
that
lives
in
an
area
that
smart
doesn't
serve,
they'll
agree
with
NoDa
or
woda.
If
they
serve
that
area
to
provide
that
transportation,
and
then
they
reimburse
that
Local
transportation
agency
do.
P
M
Services,
that's
I
haven't
heard
OPC,
but
another
two
weeks.
The
way
we've
got
it
currently
set
up,
that's
how
it
works
and
we
did
it
in
interlocal
community,
in
your
local
agency
agreement
with
smart
and
smart
yeah.
Obviously
this
is
something
that
would
come
into
play
next,
probably
by
the
time
we
get
everything
done
next
November.
So
we've
got
time
to
to
work
out
the
details
of
any
agreement.
P
M
P
Figure
out
I
think
smart
has
talked
about.
Also
I
mean
giving
the
I
mean
the
discounted
monthly
pass
for
a
veteran.
That's
going
to
use
it
on
I
mean
there's
ways
to
it's:
smart,
it's
definitely
Services
the
largest
population
of
the
county,
which
makes
sense
that
they
would
be
part
of
it.
But
I
imagine
that
there
are
probably
some
others
in
there
in
their
respective
dependence
that
can
use
it
all.
B
B
B
S
Good
morning,
we're
here
asking
for
the
approval
of
the
cost
participation
agreement
and
the
disbursement
of
funds
to
the
eight
Community
communities
that
participated
in
the
grant
reimbursement
program
this
year
and
our
cost
is
24
704.77
and
you'll
be
able
to
view
the
CVT
projects
and
costs
listed
on
your
attachment.
B
and,
as
you
know,
this
is
the
second
year
of
the
program
and
we
did
see
success
in
the
suppression
of
the
invasive
moth,
and
this
was
based
on
the
survey
results
of
the
previous
year's
treatment.
So
we're
looking.
S
We
feel
real
good
about
that.
We
do
have
two
cvts
that'll
be
performing
a
mechanical
treatment
of
ground
spray,
but
the
other
six
do
not
require
treatment
and
we
do
have
one.
It's
called
performing
a
defoliation
survey
this
summer
and
theirs
was
held
back
because
of
the
way
the
treatment
was
done.
They
need
to
look
at
it
during
the
summer,
so
so
we're
open
for
any
questions
that
you
may
have.
S
Already
transitioning
the
surveys
have
been
completed
and
then
the
two
communities
will
be
doing
their
spraying
very
soon
when
it's
appropriate
for
the
spraying
of
the
model.
So
thank
you.
Yes
thank.
C
You
not
really
a
question
just
I
love,
seeing
Rochester
Rochester,
Hills
and
Auburn
Hills
on
on
the
list,
and
we've
got
to
suppress
them.
Msu
extensions
great
to
work
with
so
congrats.
R
S
B
Thank
you,
Commissioners.
Thank
you.
Motion
carries
all
right.
Last
item
well.
Item
g
under
regular
is
the
Board
of
Commissioners
fiscal
year,
2023
appropriation
for
the
local
Road
Improvement
program,
and
we
have
Amy
Opry
who's
here
to
discuss
that
with
us
and
then
there's
an
announcement
about
either
she
or
I
will
make
so
Mr
wiper.
It
looks
like
he
moved
supported
by
commissioner
Johnson
Amy.
Thank
you
for
your
patience
and
welcome.
Q
Commissioner,
weipert
kind
of
covered
a
lot
of
the
information
earlier
under
the
communication.
This
is
related
to
that.
As
you
guys
know,
you
appropriated
two
million
dollars
in
the
budget
for
the
local
Road
Improvement
program.
We
combined
that
with
a
rollover
of
unused
funding
from
2022,
so
that
we
had
2
million
one
hundred
and
fifty
five
thousand
eight
hundred
and
four
dollars
available
to
distribute
to
40
eligible
communities.
Q
In
the
program
we
received
applications
from
36
totaling,
2
million
one
hundred
thousand
five
hundred
dollars
and
those
are
included
in
the
resolution.
There
were
three
communities
that
opted
out
of
the
program
and
we
did
receive
one
late
application
that
was
from
the
city
of
Clawson.
That's
going
to
be
reviewed
by
the
special
committee
before
caucus
on
May
25th.
Q
So
we
are
gonna,
have
an
amendment
to
this
item
that
will
make
on
the
board
floor
to
add
Clausen
to
the
schedule
a
into
the
schedule.
B
classes
project
was
29
876
dollars
which
will
bring
the
new
Total
to
2
million,
one
hundred
and
thirty
thousand
four
hundred
and
twenty
six
dollars
which
results
in
unspent
funds
for
this
year's
program.
Q
At
twenty
five
thousand
three
hundred
and
seventy
eight
dollars
and
using
the
formula
and
the
policy
for
the
program
to
address
commissioner
Roman's
earlier
question,
the
funding
is
traditionally
rolled
into
the
next
year's
program
for
distribution.
B
Thank
you
Amy
any
questions
from
the
commissioners
commissioner
Ramen
thank.
D
You
Amy
question
for
you,
so
the
remaining
20
000
I
understand
if
it's
not
spent,
will
roll
over
as
it
did
last
year.
Is
it
too
late
to
still
put
in
a
request
to
use
those
remaining
funds,
or
is
that
ship
party
sale.
Q
The
the
for
a
community-
that's
already
submitted
a
project,
it's
kind
of
late
to
I
mean
we
they
could
amend
their
application
if,
if
they
wanted
to
but
to
redistribute
those
funds,
the
the
policy
that's
been
established
for
the
program
has
a
formula
that
that
would
redistribute
it
to
all
the
communities,
so
that
would
really
diminish
having
such
a
low
amount.
That
would
really
diminish
to
something:
that's
not
as
useful
I,
don't
know,
but
I
I'm
happy
to
talk.
Q
P
Thank
you,
man,
chair
and
so
I
just
want
to
clarify
that
we
assign
money
on
an
annual
basis,
and
this
is
the
Appropriations
I
mean
we're
the
board,
determines
how
how
and
for
what
project
do
we
usually
do
it
in
a
a
dollar
for
dollar
match,
with
the
respect
to
host
communities?
So
I,
don't
know
the
specifics
of
I
mean
of
a
particular
community
that
dollar
that's
allocated
for
them
sure,
but
I
give
and
and
the
stuff
I
don't
What's
the
total
unallocated
for
this
fiscal
year
Amy.
That's
not
that
wasn't
allocated.
P
Up
there
that
I
guess
in
theory
of
if
someone
says
hey,
we
can
put
more
money
to
get
matched
for
that
that
we
could
potentially
amend
this
going
forward
right
because
that
money
would
be
oh,
that
is
not
necessarily
allocated
to
a
specific
Community,
because
it's
not
part
of
this
accurate.
B
B
Motion
carries
I,
do
I
do
have
an
announcement
to
make
that
a
public
hearing
is
set
for
the
Oakland
County
Board
of
Commissioners
meeting
on
May
25th
at
6
PM
for
the
fiscal
year
2023
appropriation
for
the
local
Road
Improvement
program
and,
as
was
mentioned,
Clawson
will
be
added
as
an
amendment.
P
Mr,
chair
I
mean
I
love.
This
chart
that
kind
of
shows
all
the
the
projects
just
for
our
future
and
I
could
probably
go
and
add
up
in
my
head.
But
if,
for
the
future,
can
we
add
up
with
the
total
project
budgets.
P
B
So
we're
all
set
with
that
item
because
we
voted
and
it's
as
it
was
supposed
to
so
that
takes
us
to
item
not
on
the
agenda,
which
is
public
comment.
Anyone
from
the
public
can
address.
This
committee
does
not
have
to
be
related
to
what's
on
the
agenda.
Three
minutes
you
get
you
get
to
speak.
Is
there?
P
So
the
last
time
we
gathered
coming
to
speak
to
something
that
was
in
this
closed
session
without
talking
about
closed
session.
There's
an
opportunity
to
take
the
next
step,
but
we
can't
do
it
and
in
time
is
of
the
essence,
but
we
can't
do
it
until
three
o'clock
this
afternoon.
So
my
question
is
who's
available.
If
we,
if
we
stayed
at
recess,
who
might
be
available
good.
J
I
M
E
D
P
R
P
I
mean
if
the
chair
is
agreeable,
that
we
they
stand
in
recess.
Okay,
maybe
we
could
do
it
and
then,
if
we
meet
to
reconvene
we
do
and
if
we
don't,
we
don't
understand,
but
we,
if
we
don't,
then
we
need
to
call
a
special
meeting.
Somehow
yeah.