►
From YouTube: Finance Committee Meeting 07-12-23
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
Moved
by
commissioner
long
supported
by
commissioner
Brahman
I
want
to
check
here.
A
Is
is
the
schedule
up
to
date
with
Aaron
cattell's
presentation
having
been
moved?
Is
that
the
Economic
Development
Corporation.
B
Section
A
A,
the
Economic
Development
Community
recommendations,
executive.
A
A
All
right,
I
got
a
message:
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
sorry,
all
right,
I'm
sure
you
have
six
years
they're
on
A's,
okay.
Next,
we
have
public
comment.
Is
there
anybody
from
the
public
who
cares
to
address
the
committee
at
this
time.
A
Seeing
no
one
will
close
public
comment
and
move
on
to
Communications
item
7A
is
the
Oakland
County
Pioneer
and
Historical
Society
Garden
Project
update
I
only
have
one
item
under
Communications
today.
Anybody
want
to
make
a
motion,
commissioner
Rahman
supported
by
commissioner
Cavell.
All
right
go
ahead
and
grab
the
vote.
Please
an
item
7A.
A
A
I'm
sure
you
have
68
zero
names.
Okay
motion
carries.
Thank
you.
Next
up,
we
have
item
eight,
a
you
can
under
Economic
Development
and
infrastructure
committee
recommendations
fiscal
year,
2023
Michigan,
Economic,
Development,
Corporation
Grant,
with
Oakland
County
Grant
acceptance
by
commissioner
weibert,
supported
by
commissioner
Cabell
yeah,
so
I
think
we're
ready
for
you,
Ms
Patel.
B
F
A
G
Cabell
there's
no
match
to
this
right
nope.
It
doesn't
look
like.
H
A
A
Okay,
next
up,
we
have
departmental
recommendations.
First,
one
is
item:
9A
donation
of
surplus
testing
equipment
to
Oakland
Community
College
by
commissioner
Rahman,
supported
by
commissioner
long.
Is
there
anybody
here
to
talk
about
this
one
Anonymous,
custom,
machine,
okay,
I
understand
oh
hi,.
I
For
most
of
our
permanent
limits
for
both
the
wall,
like
Y
and
commerce,
facilities
as
such
as
an
homicide,
laboratory,
one
of
the
pieces
of
equipment,
is
this
Auto
Analyzer
100,
which
I
previously
touched
bills
as
part
of
the
United
normal
operations.
Many
years
ago,
however,
it
hasn't
been
in
use
for
about
a
decade
just
regarding
the
ebook
requirements.
So
now
that
that
has
happened
in
the
last
decade,
we
started
sending
out
these
two
tested
at
various
third-party
labs.
I
A
A
A
J
Good
morning,
hello,
I
know
this
probably
looks
familiar
because
you
guys
have
done
this
once
already,
but
it's
been
a
couple
years
since
I've
done
a
deficit,
elimination
plan
and
the
state
kind
of
changed.
Some
of
the
requirements
on
me
so
I
neglected
to
include
the
actual
budgets
of
how
the
elimination.
L
J
And
the
the
things
that
change
with
the
state
is
they
they've
got
some
feedback
from
Commissioners
that
Finance
departments
were
submitting
these
elimination
plans
and
Commissioners
weren't,
seeing
them
so
they've
added
the
requirement
that
they'd
be
recorded
and
a
miscellaneous
resolution
be
approved
before
they
can
be
submitted
to
the
state.
So
I've
had
a
conversation
with
the
state
they're
expecting
this.
So
everything
that
you
see
the
the
resolution
is
exactly
the
same.
J
The
added
portion
to
the
document
are
the
budgets
for
the
the
three
items
that
were
in
a
deficit
that
three
funds
and
showing
those
going
out
of
deficit
within
the
next.
The
longest
is
year.
Five
will
be
out
of
a
deficit
for
the
lake
levels
and
everything
else
we
anticipate
being
out
of
deficit
this
fiscal
year
I,
and
this
is
Shannon
Lee.
She
is
my
chief
part
of
the
fiscal
team.
H
When
staffie
County
Executive
Carlson
came
through,
we
thought
two
two
of
these
are
most
of
them
are
because
of
reimbursements,
so
yeah,
why
deficit
elimination
plan
sounds
like.
Oh,
this
is
a
big
problem.
It's
it's
the
timing
and
reimbursement.
So.
J
Absolutely
and
all
of
them
are
the
timing
and
reimbursements
the
front
of
the
court
they're,
all
Grant,
related
and,
and
so
some.
J
When
you
were
talking
about
the
state,
some
of
them
are
reimbursable
grants,
so
we
spend
the
money
up
front
and
then
we
get
the
money
back.
We
had
some
nuances
with
the
new
system.
You
know.
A
G
There's
a
300
000
loan
back
in
2010..
What
is
the
County's
long-term
revolving
fund?
Where
can
I
find
that
in
the
budget?
How
much
is
in
there?
What
can
we
use
that
money
for
and
has
the
300K
come
back
or
is
it
a
forgivable.
J
I
thought
that
you
had
been
given
the
answer
to
this,
but
I
have
it
yeah,
it's
okay
right,
because
it
came
up
last
night
right,
so
the
the
long-term
revolving
loan
and
I.
Forgive
me
I'm
reading,
because
I'm
not
not
a
long-term
revolving
little
fun
expert.
When
it
comes
to
this
area,
the
long-term
revolving
Loan
Fund
was
established
to
provide
limited
loan
amounts
to
communities
to
finance
their
water
or
sewer
projects
that
do
not
require
an
issue
into
bonds,
which
would
be
three
hundred
thousand
dollars.
It's
not
necessarily
significant
to
a
local.
J
The
limits
of
the
allowed
loan
was
originally
150
000,
but
it
raised
through
specific
project
resolutions
to
three
hundred
thousand.
The
Bush
Lake
Project
is
complete
and
received
the
loan,
and
then
those
loans
get
paid
back
by
special
assessments.
So
this
was
just
there
were
some
overruns
of
that
project,
so
the
special
assessments
needed
to
be
readjusted
so
that
they
could
pay
that
back.
The
full.
G
J
Yeah,
it's
like
it's!
So
it's
it's
a
revolving
Loan
Fund
in
in
the
sense
that
there's
a
there's
a
limit,
it's
kind
of
like
an
equity,
a
loan
on
your
house.
You
say:
okay,
you
can
take
out
three
hundred
thousand
dollars
and
you
take
it
out
as
you
need
it.
So
you
don't
have
to
take
the
full
amount
out
and
pay
the
interest
on
it
for
the
entire
time.
Let's
say
you
need
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
this
year
and
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
next
year.
You
can
take
it
out
in
installments
like
that.
J
So
that's
why
they
call
it
a
revolving
alone,
and
so
then,
as
your
loan
grows,
the
payments
increase
and
that's
how
the
payments
get
out
of
the
line
with
the
special
assessments,
but
it's
very
similar
to
an
equity
loan
on
your
house
that
you
take.
You
have
a
limit
and
you
take
out
like
to
do
your
bathroom
and
then
you're
going
to
do
your
kitchen.
So.
G
Has
this
I
think
this
might
be
again
talking
more
offline,
so
I
don't
mean
to
keep
everybody,
but,
like
I
mean
a
lot
of
communities
are
trying
to
dip
into
their
General
funds
for
lead
line,
replacement
right
and
that's
not
enough
money
to
bond.
But
you
know
it
feels
like
the
same
sort
of
thing
or
in
Royal
Oak
Township
right
just
trying
to
make
the
water
work.
Is
this
something
that
can
or
has
been
used
for
that
I.
J
Don't
I
I,
don't
know
any
locals
that
have
used
the
revolving
Loan
Fund,
it's
typically,
which
is
a
local,
something
or
another
right
right.
Well,
it's
it's
actually
a
county
project.
So
when
I
say
locals,
I
mean
cbts.
Sorry,
I,
don't
know
that
any
of
them
have
been
able
to
utilize.
J
This
revolving
Loan
Fund
for
lead
lines
and
I
was
at
a
CVT
when
all
of
these
unfunded
mandates
came
down
from
the
state
and
I
know
that
we
were
looking
at
a
whole
bunch
of
ways
to
try
and
fund,
because
I
was
in
an
older
CVT
that
had
a
lot
of
lead
lines,
as
you
know,
and
I.
If
this
would
have
been
an
option
or
a
legally
available
item,
I'm
sure
that
it
would
have
come
to
the
table.
I
didn't
specifically
research
it,
but
just
kind
of
going
on
my
gut
I.
J
A
It's
like
this
is
out
of
the
I.T
Department
creation
of
application
of
and
Client
Services,
director
infrastructure,
Services,
director
and
three
business
relationship
managers
and
then
deletion
of
two
application:
development
directors,
Deputy
CIO,
I.T
supervisor
and
I.T
project
manager,
and
if
I
can
count
that
says,
you're
eliminating
five
Physicians
and
creating
five
positions
and
we'll
start
there
all
right
by
commissioner
Whiteford
supported
by
commissioner
Smith
Charles
yeah,
all.
N
Right
well,
thank
you
all
for
teeing
that
up
I
know
this
is
our
meaty
one.
That
I
think
I
have
five
extensions,
so
you
might
be
seeing
me
here
for
a
few
minutes
so
for
some
may
remember:
Mr
kantis,
Sean
Carlos
had
brought
him
in
I,
don't
know
what
nine
months
ago,
six
months
ago,
to
kind
of
do
an
analysis
of
I.T
for
improvement
opportunities,
and
this
is
one
of
the
main
outputs
of
that
study.
So
I
did
not
want
to
steal
the
credit
for
Mr
Tyson's
good
work.
N
I've
asked
to
become
a
kind
of
present
the
findings
in
detail
to
you.
But
yes,
essentially,
it's
a
it's
a
little
bit
of
an
I.T
reorganization,
it's
budget
neutral.
So,
as
you
know
it
is,
you
know
we
balance
the
budgets.
The
goal
of
this
is
to
to
try
to
get
a
little
more
efficiency
and
Effectiveness
I.
Think
our
application
delivery
space
and
then
provides
more
consistency
of
kind
of
the
technical
side
of
the
house,
but
I'll
turn
it
over
to
Mr
Tice.
O
If
you
just
want
to
guys,
oh
there,
you
go
that'd,
be
great.
So
really
again.
Thank
you.
So
much
for
the
opportunity
to
to
meet
with
you
today,
I
had
the
opportunity
to
work
with
all
the
different
departments
and
early
on
in
this
assessment
of
looking
at
how
we
can
improve
information
technology
and
make
it
more
effective
here
within
Oakland
County.
One
of
the
clear
things
that
I
heard
from
the
different
departments
is
that
they
were
frustrated.
They
were
frustrated
with
I.T.
O
They
didn't
know
who
to
go
to
in
I.T,
specifically
for
specific
reasons
or
for
specific
things,
so
they
were
very
confused
at
who
do
they
go
to
other
than
the
help
desk?
They
were
very
confused
about
you
know,
what's
going
on
with
their
projects
or
wasn't
their
lack
of
transparency
and
a
whole
number
of
different
things
and
there's
a
best
practice
that
was
implemented
across
most
it
organizations
almost
15
years
ago,
and
that
is
the
creation
of
business
relationship
managers
and
we'll
talk
about
that
today.
O
I
want
to
talk
to
you
what
we
talked
about
about
is.
We
have
two
separate
application
development
organizations
and
we
want
to
consolidate
that
for
a
whole
host
of
very
good
reasons,
recreate
the
director
of
infrastructure
positions
and
then,
as
Rod
said,
this
is
a
cost
neutral
proposal,
not
adding
any
net
cost
to
our
operations.
If
you
want
to
hit
the
next
slide.
O
O
We
have
obviously
the
Board
of
Commissioners
and
are
really
what
we
would
call
more
external
stakeholders,
and
then
we
have
our
First
Responders
and
the
reason
why
that's
important
is
because
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
have
an
IT
organization
that
is
organized
around
those
key
clients,
those
key
customers.
So
the
next
slide
talks
about
about
the
brm
role
and
and
the
brm
the
business
relationship
role
really.
O
Is
that
focal
point
and
that
individual
that
really
helps
the
Departments
and
I.T
come
together
and
they
stay
very
much
focused,
so
anything
the
Departments,
the
sheriff's
office
or
any
department
needs
they
would
go
directly
to
that.
Brm
that
business
relationship
manager
would
then
work
within
the
appropriate
organizations
within
it
to
make
sure
that
they're
getting
done
what
they
need
to
get
done
on
behalf
of
the
different
department.
So
again,
it's
really
about
bringing
the
business
and
technology
together
and
forcing
that
integration
and
holding
everybody
accountable.
O
O
So
one
of
the
major
Focus
or
frustrations
of
a
lot
of
the
Departments
are,
is
that
there's
a
planning
process,
but
it's
really
difficult
for
a
department
to
get
their
projects
put
in
to
the
queue
and
get
it
to
to
be
focused
and
work
on
them
and
there's
a
lack
of
visibility
of
those
projects
and
the
brm
will
be
working
with
each
of
the
Departments
that
they're
responsible
for
in
providing
that
information
to
them
on
a
daily
basis,
builds
a
trusted
relationship
and
provides
a
single
point
of
contact
for
services
and
again
the
three
brms
would
be
aligned
to
the
three
different
types
of
customers
that
we
have.
O
Our
internal,
the
administration,
customers,
the
external
stakeholders
and
the
First
Responders,
and
the
brms
are
ultimately
accountable
to
those
different
departments
who
are
their
customers
to
ensure
that
it
is
meeting
their
needs.
Today
there
is
a
lack
of
accountability
in
I.T.
There
isn't
that
single
individual,
that's
ultimately
accountable
for
making
sure
we're
meeting
the
needs
of
the
human
resources
department
or
the
sheriff's
department.
You
had
a
question.
G
Yeah,
can
you
give
an
example,
internal
external
and
first
responder
customers
or
stakeholders
yeah,
that's
from
what
I
understand
previously
I?
Well,
it's
what's
it
called
single
Source
writer
that
all
the
customers
for
it
are
County
departments.
So
what
is
an
external
stakeholder.
O
So
external
stakeholders
might
not
be
a
great
name,
but
but
it
really
is
folks.
You
know
that
are
outside
of
the
of
the
administration
right,
critical
individuals.
Obviously
a
Board
of
Commissioners,
a
county
clerk,
the
courts,
the
sheriff's
department,
treasury,
WRC
parks
and
recs
are
some
of
the
examples.
Thank
you,
yep.
That's
a
great
question,
though,.
A
O
P
Right
question
was
somewhat
about
the
external
stakeholders:
part
I
I.
You
said
it.
Maybe
it's
not
the
best
name,
it's
definitely
not
because
I
don't
feel
like
I,
don't
feel
like
we
should
be
external.
If
anything,
we
are
the
rubber
that
meets
the
road
absolutely
and
so
to
your
point,
I
mean
I,
don't
know.
P
Maybe
we
were
asked
at
some
point
about
our
opinions
about
technology,
but
you
know
the
lack
of
ability
to
quickly
spin
something
up
for
the
board
is,
is
troubling
and
hopefully
I
mean
when
I
hear
brm
I
I
dare
not
say
that
it
feels
like
we're
just
a
little
more
top-heavy.
You
know,
but
you
know,
let's,
let's
finish
your.
O
Presence
yeah,
but
no
you
hit
it
right
on
the
head,
though
you're
bringing
up
on
a
great
Point.
What
you're
talking
about
your
frustration
about
I
can't
get
what
I
need
from
it
in
a
very
quick
and
Nimbo
and
agile
way,
is
exactly
what
we
heard
across
all
the
different
organizations.
So
the
brm
is
ultimately
the
person
that
actually
pushes
and
integrates
that
with
nit
and
holds
them
accountable
today.
That
role
doesn't
exist
and
in
most
organizations
I.T
organizations.
The
brm
role
is
a
best-in-class
function
that
was
implemented
over
15
years
ago.
Why?
O
You
know
Oakland
hasn't
done
it
in
the
past.
I
can't
speak
to
that,
but
it
is
a
critical
role
that
will
alleviate
a
lot
of
your
frustrations.
The
other
thing
is
the
Departments
not
only
want
to
get
their
stuff
done
today.
They
want
to
have
somebody
that
can
sit
down
with
them
and
say:
where
should
technology
be
going
in
the
health
department?
Where
should
the
Sheriff's
Office
go
as
a
release?
O
The
technology
helped
me
strategically
figure
out
where
we
should
be
going,
and
so
that
brm
plays
a
very
critical
role,
not
only
in
the
day-to-day
operations
but
helping
them
understand
how
to
better
leverage
technology.
Because
they'll
tell
you
we
don't.
You
know.
The
department
directors
are
like
we're,
not
I.T
experts,
but
we
need
people
that
can
help
us
figure
out
where
we
should
be
going.
Yes,.
G
To
what
you
just
said,
there
then
the
brm
potential
role
to
help.
For
example,
you
said
the
sheriff's
right
so
helping
the
sheriff
and
other
Clemens
users
that
are
First
Responders,
always
the
county.
The
county
executive
gave
everyone
in
Oakland
every
Police
Department
in
Oakland,
County,
free,
clemis,
transparency,
dashboard
memberships
for
like
two
years,
but
only
like
five
departments
around
the
county
out
of
the
44
policing
agencies
took
that
up.
That's
right
and
the
sheriff's
transparency
dashboard
is
after,
like
14
clicks.
G
So
is
there
a
way
to
would
the
brm
have
the
role
of
serving
the
sheriff
in
that
they're
helping
take
the
sheriffs
or
other
clemness
users
like
what
we
really
want
to
focus
on
is
X
or
is
it
the
county
executive
says
well
we'd,
really
like
more
police
departments
to
have
a
transparency
dashboard
on
the
front
of
their
Police
website,
so
we
will
help
you
do
that
who's
who's
guiding?
Who
is
it
Like,
An
accounts
manager?
G
O
And
I
think
the
brm
plays
both
roles.
Right
I
think
they
play.
You
know
whether
it's
the
day-to-day
stuff,
but
this
is
where
we're
going
and
they
also
are
very
influential
in
helping
the
administration,
push
the
administration
into
areas
that
the
clients
and
the
customers
want
us
to
go
or
need
us
to
code.
Okay,
I,
say:
I,
I,
think
that
is
a
critical
role,
so
I
think
they
do.
Both
brms
are
very
important
and
critical
positions
because
they
help
really
connect
the
business
and
the
technology
together.
O
So
technology
to
be
very
candid,
has
always
been
kind
of
built
from
the
inside
out
and
this
forces
I.T
to
really
be
built
from
the
outside
in
so
it's
really
positioning
itself
to
truly
support
all
these
different
clients
and
making
sure
that
they
have
input
and
drive
and
prioritization
of
what
it
actually
works
on.
Okay,
yep,
all
right,
I'm
ready
to
go
forward.
O
So
the
first
part,
obviously
you
can
go
to
another
slide.
The
first
part-
and
you
can
actually
go
to
two
more
slides
first
part-
is
really
the
brms
and
creating
three
brns
to
line
up
to
those
three
different
clients
and
your
comments
about
the
name
of
external
stakeholders
is
very
valid
and
it's
easily
changeable,
and
we
will
address
that.
O
O
These
are
people
that
design
build,
operate,
enhance
and
support
our
current
computer
systems
right
the
systems
that
are
out
there,
so
one
today
really
handles
really
everything
across
the
Enterprise,
with
the
exception
of
clemus,
the
other
one,
some
focuses
on
Clemens,
and
so
what
we
want
to
do
with
these
two
positions
right,
because
if
you
take
a
look
at
it,
they're
doing
the
exact
same
thing
right,
but
they're
in
kind
of
two
different
silos
and
they're
not
able
to
leverage
resources
and
skill
sets
and
knowledge
across
the
two
organizations.
O
So
the
next
slide.
What
we
want
to
do
is
we
want
to
consolidate
that
into
one
organization,
and
so
so
we
want
to
bring
those
two
organizations
into
one
and
that's
going
to
help
us
optimize
a
whole
host
of
different
things.
O
Okay,
the
next
line
the
next
slide
is
to
talk
about.
We
want
to
recreate
the
director
of
infrastructure
services.
This
is
the
person
that
ultimately
supports
our
our
data
center.
Our
servers,
our
storage
devices,
our
networks
across
the
Enterprise,
and
we
want
to
be
able
to
recreate
that
leadership
position,
to
make
sure
that
our
focus
and
energy
in
modernizing
those
Technologies
to
ensure
that,
when
our
clients
do
block
changes
that
are
back-end
infrastructure,
our
back-end
servers
and
Hardware
are
able
to
to
accommodate.
O
This
is
you
know,
you've
heard
a
lot
about
the
cloud.
A
lot
of
this
is
helping
us
move
to
the
cloud
to
become
more
Nimble
and
more
agile
and
to
be
very
Frank,
more
secure,
yeah
and
I.
Think
I
think
we
have
I,
remember
one
more
yeah.
So
again,
this
is
really
the
the
the
what
the
ultimate
organization
would
look
like
right.
The
three
brms
are
over
there
under.
O
Model
right
we
have
one
for
internal
customers,
one
for
the
the
new
name
that
we'll
come
up
with
external
stakeholders
and
the
First
Responders
and
then,
rather
than
having
two
application
development
organizations,
we
consolidate
them
into
what
and
the
infrastructure
service
instructor
is
there
as
well?
So
that's
what
it
looks
like
that's
what
the
ultimate
recommendation
looks
like.
A
P
This
chart
is
exactly
how
I'm
feeling
like
we're
we're
going
to
be
left
behind
as
external
stakeholders.
We
don't
even
get
a
proper
couple
boxes
over
us,
which
lets
me
know
already
that
we're
probably
going
to
be
left.
You
know
short,
so
my
question
is:
how
do
you
prioritize
if
the
internal
customers
want
something
and
the
externals
need
something
as
well?
Yeah.
O
No
and
that's
a
great
question
today,
it's
a
very
they
have
a
very
long
Master
planning
process.
It's
a
two-year
process,
it's
very
cumbersome.
It's
one
of
the
greatest
pain
points
of
all
our
different
departments.
This
will
actually
completely
change
that
process
because
you
will
have
a
dedicated
person
today,
you
don't
have
a
dedicated
person,
that's
working
with
you
to
try
to
figure
out
what
your
needs
are
in
your
prioritization.
So
we're
going
to
go
from
a
very
long,
lengthy,
two-year
process
into
a
really
interactive
process.
That's
occurring
day
to
day
and.
P
Then
to
I
think
my
final
question
is:
there's
been
some
things
that
the
boc
on
our
website
could
make
life
easier
for
our
residents
and
when
we
inquire
about,
how
can
we
make
that
happen?
O
Yeah
I
mean
those
are
all
very
fair
questions
and,
more
importantly,
it's
exactly
the
same
themes
that
I've
heard.
Let
me
just
be
very
clear:
there
isn't
ever
an
I.T
organization
that
is
big
enough
and
it
has
enough
money
to
do
everything
right.
So
the
real
key
is:
how
do
we
do
those
things
that
are
the
most
important
for
our
clients
and
today
we're
not
structured
this
way.
O
You
now
have
a
name,
and
somebody
that's
working
with
you
day
to
day,
to
try
to
figure
out
what
are
those
most
critical
things
and
working
on
your
behalf
to
getting
them
in
and
out
of
it,
and
that's
really
what
the
brm
role
is
intended
to
do
today
to
be
very
Frank
with
you,
we're
built
on
very
bureaucratic
internal
processes
and
we're
not
customer
focused,
and
this
changes
us
from
a
very
internal
bureaucratic
process,
oriented
organization
to
a
very
customer,
oriented
customer,
driven,
I.T
organization
and
again
I'm
not
from
same
the
I.T
organization,
is
a
bad
organization.
O
P
It's
almost
like
you
know
you
hire
someone
to
property,
manage
for
you
and
you
give
them
the
keys
and
the
access
codes
and
everything
and
then
two
three
years
later,
you're
not
happy
with
their
work
and
you
have
to
fire
them
and
then
you're
like
did
they
put
some
trip
wires
or
back
doors
that
they're?
You
know
as
soon
as
they
leave
out
the
door
everything's
deleted.
P
O
N
Right
so
so
I
think
that
is
a
risk
so
with
with
I.T
and
cyber
security,
it's
the
whole
thing
is
really
about
risk
management
in
a
sense
right.
The
way
that
the
work
of
the
security
group
gets
done
is
through
the
other
areas
of
I.T.
So
you
know
one
of
the
examples
we've
been
talking
about
most
recently
patching.
So
patching
is
critical
to
do
vulnerability
management,
the
security
folks,
don't
actually
do
the
patch
against
the
network
or
the
the
server
team
Okay.
N
So
we've
got
to
put
requests
to
the
ticket
system
that
goes
to
the
server
team.
They
they're
the
ones
that
implement
the
patching.
So
most
of
the
things
that
we
do
in
cyber
security
is
executed
by
a
different
team.
So
in
that
sense
there's
a
check
and
balance.
Now.
Is
it
possible
that
you
could
have
a
Rome
security
person,
sure
and
there's
I
guess
the
you
know
the
problem
with
cyber
security
is
there's
no
such
thing
as
full
security
right.
N
So
we
we
take
measures
to
try
to
reduce
our
risk,
but
the
risk
never
does
go
to
zero
and
years
ago.
You
know
if
you
think,
about
server.
Administration,
there's
there's
a
a
small
number
of
people
that
have
access
to
all
the
systems
because
we
needed
to
be
able
to
do
the
jobs
right,
but
those
people
also
can
have
access
to
information,
and
you
know
at
some
point
you
know
you
have
to
trust
folks
to
to
do
their
to
do
their
jobs.
N
We
can
have
systems
that
monitor
you
know
and
we're
working
on
a
privileged
access
management
thing.
That's
that's
in
our
pipeline
that
will
do
some
additional
logging
and
monitoring
to
make
sure
that
people
are
doing
what
they're
supposed
to
do
and
then
have
the
security
team.
Probably
review
that.
So
it's
there
are
checks
and
balances,
but
it's
methods
and.
O
I
would
tell
you
from
an
outside
perspective,
you
have
a
very
strong
cyber
security
team
here
with
your
CTO
TJ
and
the
team.
That's
underneath
that
and
how
they're
working
by
by
that
part
of
the
organization.
Thank
you.
G
Good
to
know,
commissioner
Cabell
yeah,
if
I
heard
you
right,
you
both
said
this
is
cost
neutral,
but
it
will
cost
19
000
this
year
and
then
84
000
a
year
ongoing.
O
Q
O
Thank
you
for
keeping
me
honest.
We're
gonna
make
those
reductions
through
contractual
or
reducing
our
contractual
services,
so
so
we'll
it'll
be
overall
cost
neutral
as
we
reduce
our
contractual
services,
so
we
do
obviously
use
outside
vendors
and
consultants
and
those
type
of
things,
and
we
will
reduce
that
to
make
sure
that
there
is
no
Financial
impact.
Oh
great,
it's
a
great
question,
though
thank
you
and
I.
O
I
I
forgot
all
about
it,
because
I
know
we
have
some
different
numbers
and
a
couple
of
these
documents
and
that's
probably
been
a
little
confusing
as
well,
but
that's
how
we're
going
to
make
insurance
cost
neutral.
Okay,.
F
Commissioner
Powell,
you
may
have
said
this,
but
with
this
reorg
chart
no
one's
losing
a
job,
but
are
these
these?
You
may
have
said
this
I
just
missed
it?
Is
it
new
positions,
these
new
positions,
or
is
these
just
read,
redesigning
the
department
itself
in
the
positions
are
already
filled.
O
Yeah,
no
it's!
It
is
redesigning
it.
The
five
new
positions:
okay,
yeah.
They
are
new
and
then
we're
eliminating
five
current
positions
to
make
sure
that
it's
a
networking.
F
Okay,
so
net
neutral
physical
body,
where
we're
there
or
you
have
to
shop
you're,
going
to
even
my
okay
yeah.
The
next
question
to
this
that
may
just
kind
of
bring
full
circle
I
just
want
how
competitive
is
it
going
to
be
to
fill
those
positions,
because
one
thing
we
know
since
we
sat
in
these
chairs,
that
was
one
of
the
big
things.
F
I.T
was
having
difficulty
finding
that
qualification
of
employment
to
come
even
fill
these
positions,
and
then
that's
why
we
did
the
com
study
to
try
to
be
more
competitive,
because
we
were
missing
that
top
tier
people
that
we
really
need
to
run.
So
my
question
is:
is
that
all
rectified
like
yep?
Where
are
we
at
with
that?
And.
O
M
I'm
Heather
Mason,
with
the
human
resources
department
and
in
this
process,
working
with
Ken
and
Rod
on
this
restructuring
we
looked
at
you
know
the
salary
ranges
for
these
positions
to
see
how
competitive
they
would
be
with
the
market
and
and
sure
with
with
information
technology,
that
we
could
attract
the
talent
for
any
vacant
positions
that
they
have,
that
they
need.
We
kind
of
let
let
them
lead
the
vision
and
made
sure
we
could.
F
F
A
M
I
can
kind
of
speak
to
part
of
that.
Currently
the
I.T
supervisor
position
is
vacant
so
and
that's
why
we're
eliminating
that
to
assist
with
the
funding?
For
that.
M
N
N
A
That's
good,
thank
you.
Anybody
else
on
this
I
will
just
say:
I
think
we're
all
happy
to
hear
that
it
is
taking
a
new
look
at
their
structure
and
how
to
do
things
better,
because
I
think
every
single
one
of
us
has
had
an
issue
or
two
along
the
way.
So
it's
good
it's
time
to
it's
such
a
big,
wide-ranging,
difficult
topic
for
people
who
don't
understand
exactly
what
it
really
requires
that
it
is
good
that
we're
kind
of
churning
this
whole
thing
and
looking
at
what
makes
sense
moving
forward.
A
F
More
thing
it
was
Mr
Tim's
right
who,
formerly
with
us
I
just
want
to
shout
him
out
again,
because
he
had
to
fill
some
shoes
and
just
try
to
deal
with
those
Commissioners
as
best
as
he
could
and
I
just
want
to
thank
him
for
that,
even
though
I
know
he's
gone,
but
I
just
want
to
put
it
on
record.
So
thank
you.
Thank
you
for
that.
That's
right.
P
To
Charles
yeah,
thank
you,
so
you
said
Mr
Powell,
a
question
in
real
quick
I
just
wanted
to
ask
chair
and
finance
committee.
You
know
in
a
couple
in
a
month
or
so
we'll
be
around
this
table
talking
about
budgets
and
inevitably
at
least
as
far
as
I
the
last
few
years
I've
been
here,
it's
always
cut
something.
You
know
they
always
have
to
find
three
percent
find
five
percent,
and
sometimes
it
just
feels
like
we
do
this.
P
We
say,
okay
and
then
we'll
see
you
guys
back
in
August
and
you're
like
we
gotta
reduce,
we
gotta
move
people
so
I'm
just
curious.
Our
big
picture
is
finance.
Is
that
just
how
it
works
here?
Like
it?
You
know
it's
in
May
you
may
hire,
but
you're
told
in
July
you
gotta
cut,
and
you
know
just
to
bring
the
budget
to
a
balance.
Is
that
is
that
pretty
much.
A
Last
year,
two,
the
past
two
years,
there's
been
the
four
percent
cut
and
if
the
Departments
took
it
all
at
once,
then
they
didn't
have
to
take
it
again
right,
and
so
those
two
I
think
the
two-year
process
of
making
that
happen
to
bring
the
budget
in
balance
is
complete
this
year,
okay
and
I
think
that's
gonna
happen
again.
Unless
somebody
knows
something:
I
don't
and
that's
very
possible.
G
A
P
Because
I
really
like
us
to
keep
our
our
staff
in
you
know
so
that
they
can
have
some
consistency.
You
know
having
just
gone
through
a
refi
I
know
two
years
worth.
P
F
Commissioner,
in
the
meantime,
that's
a
good
question
that,
at
the
end,
when
we
I
think
have
our
budget,
if
we
can
chair
just
had
them
touch
base
on
that
to
give
us
an
update,
is
we
done?
Are
we
are
we
finished,
or
is
there
going
to
be
some
surprising
surprises
this
year,
so
French
for
us
to
know
Finance.
A
A
A
C
C
A
N
Okay,
so
so
before
we
we
dive
into
these
I
started
working
with
the
team
to
see
if
there's
a
way
that
we
could
do
kind
of
quicker
rfps
so
that
we
don't
have
to
do
so.
Many
of
these
extensions,
the
the
bucket
that
these
kind
of
fall
into
are
systems
that
either
we've
had
for
a
long
time
or
systems
that
are
more
deeply
integrated
in
the
environment,
so
they're
costly
to
rip
out.
N
But
that
being
said,
you
know
we
don't
want
to
get
ourselves
into
a
position
where
we're
just
extending
for
multiple
decades
because
of
the
technology
gets
stale
right
if
it
doesn't
give
people
that
kind
of
open
competitive
thing.
So
some
of
the
the
friction
around
this
has
been
that
the
kind
of
the
RFP
process
that
we
have
been
using
is
very
thorough
and
it's
lengthy,
and
so
we
have
to
pull
people
off
of
doing
work
to
put
the
rfps
together.
N
Large
bids
come
in.
They
have
to
be
evaluated
so
I
think
for
some
of
these
we
could
either
just
bid
out
the
support
or,
if
it's
something
larger,
like
a
like
a
Microsoft
or
a
workday,
That
We're,
Not
Gonna,
you
know
it's
be
very
costly
to
remove.
We
just
put
those
constraints
into
the
quick
bid,
RFP
and
say:
okay,
so
we,
you
know:
if
we're
going
to
go
with
another
product,
we
have
to
have
the
training
covered.
We
have
to
have
the
integration
covered
and
we'll
see
what
the
market
has
to
say
about
it.
N
You
know
the
same
reasons
why
we're
reluctant
to
do
the
integration
is
why
the
private
sector
would
be
unable
to
meet
the
bid
so
long
story
short
I'd
like
to
see
if
we
could
get
these
bid
out
in
a
kind
of
a
quick,
quick,
RFP
shorter
way,
so
that
we'd
have
less
of
these
exceptions
moving
forward,
but
we're
not
we're
not
quite
there
yet,
but
that's
kind
of
my
list
of
things
to
do
so.
The
first
one
today
is
this:
this
telesoft,
so
this
is
we've.
We've
had
this
for
24-ish
years.
N
It's
a
it's
a
piece
of
software
that
does
the
the
tracking
of
the
Telecom
expenses
so
that
we
could
bill
it
back
to
the
the
Departments.
So
that's
kind
of
the
primary
function
of
that
it's
it's
a
super
back
officey
thing
and
I've
been
talking
with
Kyle
a
little
bit
about
you
know,
potentially
changing
the
way
that
it
does
the
does
the
chargebacks
to
simplify
it.
So
this
might
be
something
that
we
could
kind
of
put
into.
I.
Think
Kyle
refers
to
it
as
ignorex.
N
My
concern
always
is,
is
you
know,
is
the
is
the
internal
cost
of
tracking
this
billing
it
back
greater
than
the
value
of
it.
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
have
transparency.
I've
kicked
off
a
kind
of
a
third-party,
it
cost
Benchmark.
N
So
we
can
see
you
know
where's
our
spend
relative
to
you
know
other
other
counties
of
our
size,
so
that's
kind
of
a
move
forward
thing
that
I'm
going
to
try
to
work
with
with
financial
services
and
see
if
we
can
simplify
some
of
this,
but
in
the
meantime
we've
got
to
kind
of
stay
the
course.
So
that's
the
telesoft
piece,
the
second
one
so
OCTA
somebody
may
be
familiar.
N
So
it's
our
two-factor
authentication
increase
the
cyber
security
OCTA
has
a
preferred
reseller,
which
is
caresoft,
I,
think,
even
if
we
were
to
bid
this
out
there
likely
be
one
better.
So
to
avoid
the
the
expense
for
no,
no,
you
know
the
squeeze
for
no
juice,
we're
looking
to
extend
that
and
again
at
doctor's
been
working
well
for
us,
we
have
some.
You
know
we're
rolling
out
this
open
sesame
thing,
so
you
can
do
a
biometric
piece
to
make
the
login
easier.
So
far,
I
think
we've
been
pretty
satisfied
with
that.
N
That's
that's
that
one!
The
esri
is
our
GIS
software.
So
this
is
a
it's
a
big.
You
know
big
piece
of
the
infrastructure.
I
believe
that
part
of
this
agreement
gives
the
web
access
to
the
cvts
for
free,
so
I
think
we've
got
other.
You
know
other
entities
that
are
able
to
leverage
some
of
this
again.
It's
you
know:
they're
they're,
a
market
leader
in
the
space
I
think
there's
other
Solutions,
but
they're
they're
kind
of
the
heavyweights.
N
It's
unlikely
that
we
would,
you
know,
diversify
from
them,
but
again,
if
I
could
do
a
quick
bid
for
the
maintenance
of
this
I
think
it
would
be
helpful,
but
you
know
in
the
meantime
we're
looking
for
an
extension
on
that
the
leads
our
line
was
new
to
me,
so
the
rest
of
these
I
well,
except
for
the
first
one
I
hadn't
heard
of,
but
this
one
I
hadn't
heard
of
so
this
is
pawn
shops
to
track
stolen,
stolen
merchandise,
I
guess
so.
N
Some
of
this
is
to
to
help
the
sheriffs
with
insurance
fraud.
If
somebody
says
that
their
you
know,
their
gun
was
stolen
and
then
they
go
to
a
different
state
and
they
try
to
pawn
the
gun.
This
leads
online,
collects
all
of
that
together
and
does
reporting
back
so
that
people
can
be
arrested,
so
we
actually
squeezed
them
a
little
bit
during
the
negotiations.
N
For
this
we
got
some
cost
savings
I'm
moving
forward,
so
we
had
we
smoothed
out
the
kind
of
the
inflation
Factor
across
the
five
years
and
we
got
some
additional
like
another
four
percent
off
on
that,
so
that
one
was
I,
think
solid.
This
elevon,
so
This
does
the
the
credit
card
processing
for
us
for
the
G2G
longer
term.
I.
Think
we've
got
some
thoughts
about
how
maybe
to
to
work
this
differently,
but
in
the
meantime
we
need
to.
A
L
L
N
I'm,
not
I'm,
not
exactly
sure
what
the
what
the
rate
is
on
this,
but
our
our
thought
would
be
that
you
know
moving
forward,
as
we
kind
of
think
about
the
the
future
of
this
is
to
to
maybe
get
multiple
providers
that
could
you
know
that
we've
got
to
load
balance
across
for
this,
and
then
you
know
have
them
kind
of
take
a
look
and
see
if
they
can
help
us
with
the
Integrations
I.
Specifically
I,
don't
know
what
the
what
the
percentage
and.
N
O
Just
to
reinforce
you
know,
Ron's
comment:
this
is
an
extension
to
allow
us
to
go
out
and
rebid
it.
Oh,
oh!
So
that's
exactly
what
they're
doing
you're
exactly
right!
This
Market
is
commoditized
and
so
prices
are
going
down
quite
frequently.
So
yes,
the
the
idea
here
is
to
extend
it
enough
to
put
it
back
out
and
and
do
exactly
what
Rod
talked
about,
and
that
is
not
only
to
rebid
it
but
to
get
multiple
vendors
in
there
at
the
same
time,
so
it
becomes
even
more
competitive.
We
can
drive
that
price
point
out.
C
That
is
true,
but
the
county
we
charge
the
clients
too
that
fee.
Don't
we
that's
a
big
difference
from
a
small
business.
We
don't
so
you
look
more
competitively,
so
I
agree
with
you.
I
want
to
get
competitive
and
not
discharge
the
4.95.
You
know
fee
just
because
we're
comfortable
charging
it
to
the
person.
Let's
get
it
down
there,
where
it's
competitive
with
other
businesses,
so
I
agree.
G
Thanks
I
think
Yolanda
was
first
so.
G
Thank
you
appreciate
it.
I
have
to
step
out
for
work,
call
so
real
quick
to
that
about
the
fees
for.
G
Go
back
to
do
the
RFP
committee
or
whatever
I
guess,
is
part
of
that,
seeing
what
the
cost
is
to
Oakland
County
residents
in
terms
of
like
the
you
know,
if
you
go
to
that,
I'm,
not
sure.
G
G
Yeah,
that's
just
more
of
a
statement
than
a
question,
but
a
question
I
did
have
was
so
there's
I
believe
it
was
the
kerasoft
which
is
a
five-year
extension
with
an
option
for
another
five
years.
G
To
talk
more
about
the
theory
of
why
we
would
give
you
a
10-year
contract.
Like
I
know,
you
were
kind
of
priming
us
for
that
and
you're
kind
of
Preamble,
but
like
should
we
expect
to
see
a
lot
of
that.
Is
that
good
for
saving
the
county
money?
What
about
the
board's
prerogative
or
power
as
the
first
holders
yeah.
N
For
sure
yeah
and
so
I
think
with
this
one
specifically,
for
you
know
the
the
two-factor
authentication
there's
a
lot
of
integration.
That's
behind
that
not
to
say
that
we
can't
undo
it
and
if
there's
some
technology
that
you
know
happens,
you
know
with
fewer
than
10
years.
You
know
totally
open
and
moving
to
that,
I
think
it's
just
that
we
you
know
we
wanted
the
five
years
with
an
option
just
in
case
the
market
doesn't
mature.
Sometimes
things
get.
N
Technology
gets
to
a
point
where,
like
you
know,
like
Microsoft
Word
right,
so
they
come
up
with
new
versions
of
it.
But
it's
not
it's
not
dramatically
different
from
the
persons
we've
had
before.
So
if
this
is,
if
if
this
is
still
working
and
it's
kind
of
good
enough,
it's
possible
that
the
cost
of
ripping
it
out
replacing
is
something
that's
kind
of
imperative,
wouldn't
be
there.
So
I
think
this
just
gives
the
option
for
that,
but.
G
N
Well
so
this
rebidding
thing
that
I
talked
about
it
may
just
be
that
we
have
the
two
Builders
right,
but
at
least
I
think
it's
important
to
go
through
the
process
so
that
we're
not
just
you
know
continually
extending
without
being
like
conscious
about
it
right.
So
I
think.
If
we're,
if
we're
intentional
about
our
extension,
I
think
that's
fine
I,
think
it's
good
to
cross-check
the
market,
just
to
make
sure
that
you
know
what
we
think
is
there
is
there
now.
N
The
flip
side
of
this
is
that
there's
some
risk
and
I
don't
know
how
much
of
this
will
be
realized,
but
some
of
the
vendors
have
kind
of
informally
said:
hey.
You
know
if
you're
going
to
make
us
go
out
to
bid
we're
going
to
raise
the
price
yeah
right.
Well,
you
know
in
some
ways
we
could
try
to
negotiate
that
back
down,
but
in
other
ways,
I
think
that
it's
you
know
some
of
this
is
just
the
major
public
sector
right.
So
it's
you
know,
I
guess.
N
We
yeah,
we
did
I
mean
some
of
the
some
of
the
smaller
vendors
I
think
are
a
little
more
flexible
when
we
say
hey,
there's
value
to
you,
the
larger
companies.
Have
you
know,
groups
of
people
that
just
respond
to
these
rfps,
so
they're
not
really
saving
them
that
much
and
they
also
you
know
they
like
to
exercise
their
market
dominance
to
to
not,
you
know,
be
as
flexible,
so
sometimes
we
we
could
get
a
victory
other
times.
It's
more
difficulty.
F
And
then
is
any
of
this
going
to
improve
or
help
property
Gateway
operate
better.
N
F
Okay,
well
can
I
at
least
put
that
out
there
to
I.T
property.
Gateway
needs
some
help.
I've
I've
had
City
staff,
try
to
act
get
in
and
they
gotta
like
log
out
log
back
on
twice
and
then
I've
even
tried
to
look
at
stuff
for
numbers
and
some
days
it
works
some
days.
It's
not
so
I
just
want
to
put
it
on
it.
Radar
I,
probably
Gateway,
needs
some
help.
Okay,.
A
F
A
Okay,
next
up
item
nine
I
sponsorship
of
the
2023
Arts
Anthony
Festival,
the
city
of
Royal
Oak
motion
by
commissioner
from
long
supported
by
commissioner
Powell,
all
right,
so
you
know
nothing:
new
yeah,
okay,
so
I'm
gonna
make
a
comment
about
this.
The
Chairman's,
not
here
and
he'll,
probably
be
mad
at
me
for
doing
this.
A
But
as
we
talk
about
special
projects
for
commissioners,
it's
it's
always
been
sort
of
a
one-time
deal,
a
special
thing,
or
if
it's
something
like
going
to
be
ongoing,
we
start
and
then
we
find
people
to
respond
to
respond
and
years
going
forward.
Somebody
else
takes
it
over.
That's
been
pretty
typical
of
how
the
special
projects
have
gone
this
one.
A
You
know:
we've
been
sponsoring
Arts
Beats
and
eats
for
quite
a
number
of
years,
and
it's
not
a
small
number.
It
doesn't
really
kind
of
so
I'm
gonna
support.
This
obviously
I
think
we
all
are
but
I
think
I
would
like
to
look
at
the
county
finding
a
better
way
to
institutionalize
our
support
of
Arts
Beats
and
eats,
rather
than
just
have
it
come
out
of
the
board
of
commissioner's
general
fund
special
projects.
That's
my
another
take
on
it
is,
commissioner,.
F
Powell
and
also
I
just
are
we
even
aware
if
there's
any
perks
for
our
County
staff
or
us,
or
in
these
sponsorships,
like
foreign.
F
Q
The
fact
that
in
the
contracts
we
make
sure
that
the
counties
are
the
county
is
being
promoted
and
if
there
are
there's
rarely
ever
ticketed
events
for
the
events
that
we're
sponsoring.
So
it's
not
like
we're
asking
for
a
certain
number
of
tickets
or
anything
like
that.
It's
mainly
the
promotion
of
the
County
Board
of
Commissioners,
the
use
of
the
logo,
how
it'll
be
used
and
with
each
of
these
sponsorships
within
the
invoice
or
the
agreement
Andrea
and
myself
make
sure
it
lays
out
exactly
what
we'll
be
getting
for
that.
Q
A
Else,
yeah
all
right:
let's
go
ahead
and
prompt
the
vote
on
this.
A
A
Okay
motion
carries
Earth's,
Pizza
needs
is
on
again
all
right.
Next
up:
item
10A
from
the
public
health
and
safety
committee,
acceptance
from
the
office
of
National
Drug
control
policy
for
the
2023,
high
intensity,
drug
trafficking,
areas.
A
A
P
Charles
is
the
four-letter
word
overtime.
I
just
wanted
to
ask:
you
is
132
000
a
drop
in
the
bucket?
Will
it
will
it
help
out
tremendously?
And
then,
if
you,
you
know
just
overall
are
having
people
have
to
do
more
overtime,
you
know
are
those
things
we
can
be
chewing
on
over
the
next
couple
months
to
figure
out
how
to
make
that
better,
because
some
people
don't
like
overtime,
because
it's
extra
work
for
them
well,.
R
This
is
a
specialized
unit.
So
if
you
look
at
the
attachment
B,
it
has
a
list
of
all
the
participating
other
departments.
So
132
000
does
not
go
a
long
way.
I
mean
it's
a
small
portion,
but
it
goes
back
to
the
local
units
too.
So,
okay
and
then
over
time
in
general,
is
always
a
struggle
for
us,
and
you
know
we're
still.
There
we've
hired,
though
there's
a
interesting
fact.
Since
last
June
we
actually
have
a
to
this
June
22
to
23.
We
have.
R
P
Seasoned
and
then
do
you
know,
call
me
a
complete
novice,
but
is
there
a
lot
of
high
intensity
drug
trafficking
happening
in
Oakland,
County
yeah?
P
G
P
K
Don't
have
any
specific
numbers,
but
I
they
have
a
lot
of
cases,
it's
all
over
the
county.
They
work
with
other
jurisdictions.
It's
it's
a
county
teams.
We
have
other
departments,
it's
not
just
a
sheriff's
office
so
and
it's
it.
We
go
off
into
other
areas
as
needed,
based
on
where
the
leads
files
but
I
think
we're
the
highest
producer
in
this
area
for
our
height
for
Highlands,
okay,.
L
Q
P
P
That's
not
a
Oakland
County
government
initiative
with
those
little
vending
machines
for
the
Narcan.
Just
wanted
to
understand
that
and
and
so
when
we
talk
about
high
intensity,
drug
trafficking.
Is
that
just
selling
drugs
is
that
drug
sales
like
people
selling
illegal
drugs,
is
that
what
trafficking
is
I?
Guess
I'm,
not
familiar
with
that.
You
know
about
human
trafficking
right
and
again,
I'm
gobsmacked,
that
we
have
high
intensity
drug
trafficking
here
in
Oakland,
County
I.
Don't
know
why,
but
we're
not
a
border.
You.
P
F
P
A
E
A
Motion
carries
thanks
all
right
item
we're
getting
there.
Next
are
the
items
out
of
Economic
Development
and
infrastructure
committee
item
11a,
the
Clinton
River
water
resource
recovery
facility,
optimization
project
I
need
a
motion.
Commissioner
Smith
Charles,
commissioner
weipert
supports
yeah.
We
have
Mr
Lockhart
from
water
resources
on
the
screen,
so
welcome.
S
To
get
rid
of
about
10
generators
facility,
centralized
the
power
capacity
of
the
power
of
service,
along
with
the
generators
and
also
the
exciting
purpose,
is
providing
two
biogas
energy
generators
we're
going
to
try
to
utilize
those
that
it
burns
the
value
yeah
so
apparently
a
byproduct
of
a
wastewatered
off
or
when
feasible
uses
for
a
candy
system.
So
it's
a
process
and
reduces
their
volumes.
A
A
little
shorter
presentation
than
the
one
in
EDI,
but
it's
all
right,
yeah
we
asked
stuff.
So
anybody
else
have
any
other
questions
or
comments
seen
them.
Let's
go
ahead
and
vote.
C
B
A
A
E
All
right
welcome
good
afternoon.
Everyone
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
before
you
today.
I'm
Kristen
melting
with
Oakland
County
in
the
planning
Division
and
with
me
I
have
Sarah
logged
pocket
she's
with
the
transit
division.
A
planner
before
you
today
is
an
interlocal
agreement
for
the
transportation
reimbursement
program.
This
is
an
interim
program
just
for
2023
for
communities
that
were
not
provided
service
with
the
transit
providers
named
in
the
village,
OPC
or
smart.
These
communities
are
primarily
in
the
Northwest
part
of
the
county
in
the
southwest
part
of
the
county.
E
There
were
20
eligible
communities
and
we
received
eight
applications
and
back
in
February,
the
Board
of
Commissioners
approved
the
program
and
also
appropriated
five
hundred
thousand
dollars.
We've
received
those
eight
applications
from
the
eligible
communities
and
we
are
also
requesting
an
additional
appropriation
of
351
415
dollars
to
the
program
to
cover
the
amount
of
requested
funds
from
the
program.
Applications
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
D
Commissioner
Rockman,
thank
you
very
much.
I
have
one
question.
This
reimbursement
now
is
dollar
for
dollar
right.
There's
no
limit
on
it.
I
mean
we're
allocating
so
much
money,
but
their
cost
of
their
cost,
and
they
all
pay
property
tax
out
there.
So
these
different
groups
receive
reimbursement
for
what
they
spend.
That's.
E
D
D
E
D
E
So
the
there
are
eligible
expenses
and
I
believe,
like
the
drivers,
fuel
costs,
some
communities,
there's
there's
two
different
types
of
communities:
we've
got
some
that
use
People's
Express,
which
is
a
third
party
provider
and
they
charge
the
community
as
a
per
trip
cost.
And
then
we
have
other
communities
like
Brandon
Township,
where
they
operate
a
service
through
their
senior
center,
so
they
would
be
eligible
for,
like
fuel
cost
reimbursements,
any
insurance
costs
that
are
part
of
the
program.
So
those
are
those
are
eligible
expenses.
D
D
A
All
right:
let's
go
ahead
and
prompt
the
vote.
Then
okay,.
A
I
know
this
is
going
to
satisfy
some
of
the
communities
like
mine,
where
they
felt
like
okay.
We
just
passed
this
Transit,
but
we're
doing
this
off
on
the
side,
we're
already
doing
it
yeah
it
closes
that
Gap
until
the
bigger
millage
plan
is
implemented
and
I
think
that's
very
helpful
toward
getting
community
support
for
what
we
want
to
do
going
forward
with
the
millage.
A
A
I'm
sure
you
have
seven
A's
zero
names.
Thank
you
motion
carries
we're
all
set.
Thank
you.
Next
up.
We
have
another
public
comment.
Our
second
is
there.
Anybody
here
who
appears
to
address
us
next
year,
seeing
no
one
I,
will
close
public
comment
and
unless
there's
any
other
business
to
bring
before
the
finance
committee,
I
will
call
the
this
meeting
adjourned
at
12
26.