►
From YouTube: ONNX Edge WG meeting 20190619
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
So
our
agenda
is
pretty
much
the
same
as
last
time
and
last
time,
I
couldn't
make
it
but
yeah
so
the
motel
everything,
and
so
we
are
continuing
the
view
of
the
edge
scope
and
profile
definition,
document
and
I
think
bought
me.
An
offer
made
some
comments
yesterday.
I
just
saw
that
yet
you
don't
made
pretty
much
new
commits
right.
You
don't
yes
yeah,
so
so
I
think.
Let's,
let's
see
I
mean
what
is
again.
A
It
seems
like
because
you
are
the
main
you
don't
your
main
maintainer
of
this
document
and
all
of
that
so
I.
It
might
make
sense
for
you
to
kind
of
drive
this
as
well
and
go
through
the
document
and
maybe
follow
up
on
any
items
that
may
have
been
left
that
you
was
wanted
to
discuss
so
last
time.
I
think
I
can
yeah.
I
saw
that
remote
control
right
I
can
give
you
control
right.
Oh
yes,
you
can
give
me
yeah,
so
I
just
gave
you
the
control
of
the
screen.
C
C
Actually,
yeah
I
just
commit
after
the
document,
based
on
with
your
your
comment,
because
you're
coming
a
very
concrete
and
very
detailed
as
quick
comments,
so
I
just
refreeze
or
recent
in
the
my
statement,
based
on
your
comments,
actually
I
myself
didn't
make
too
many
changes
so
I,
just
most
of
my
work
is
just
copy
paste.
Your
comment.
C
What
your
suggestion
is
and
and
change
to
my
commit
to
my
document
so
I
think
there's
not
many
for
me
to
talk
about
because
just
like
the
scope
of
edge,
because
you
guys
suggest,
broadly
speaking,
scope
of
edge
can
be
defined
as
a
proper
purchase.
Summary
freezes
of
mice,
of
freezes
or
symptoms.
So
that's
it.
So
if
there
is
any
other
sections
or
items
we
are
left
to
talk
about,
we
can
just
talk.
A
C
A
A
B
A
B
A
A
A
C
Yeah
I
remember:
there
is
another
picture
in
the
slides
that
I
mentioned
chart
or
retouch.
Are
you?
You
guys
call
ads
yeah.
We
have
something
like
computation
capabilities.
Some
attributes
like
power,
consumption
and
memory
limit
bandwidth
so
depends
on
different
scenarios
where
you
have
different
requirement:
different
requirements
for
its
devices,
so
some
devices
requires
super
low
latency
and
some
devices
requires
low
computation
power
so
which
all
at
multi
dimension
charge.
So
so
can
we
put
that
picture
into
this
talk
just
in
theory
you're
talking
to
about
the
drawing
from
the
workshop?
Yes,
yes,.
A
A
So
here
I
made
this
blur
here
and
I,
actually
I
think
I
said
in
computing.
I,
don't
see
we
need
edge
here
this
one,
it
just
seemed
computing.
There
always
compromises
to
be
made.
Answer
computing
at
the
edge
is
no
exception,
and
so
we
can
think
of
the
edge
profile
attributes
as
dimensions
on
which
trade-offs
are
being
made
in
edge
scenario,
yeah
yeah,
and
so
does
that
make
sense.
A
B
C
A
A
C
A
A
A
A
Do
we
agree
that
these
five
attributes
are
sufficient
to
define
profiles
right
and
I'm
thinking?
Even
it's
somewhat
tied
is
somewhat
tied
to
the
scenarios
right
and
use
cases,
and
so
it's
a
part
of
the
profile.
We
will
be
start
defining
the
specific
profiles
which
and
then
I'm
thinking
like.
If,
if
during
the
scope
of
work
of
defining
some
profiles,
we
realize
or
should
we
we
need
one
more
attributes,
I
think
it's
okay,
we
can
go
back
and
we
can
go
back
and
update
right.
I
mean
this
is
not
necessarily
written
in
stone
forever.
B
We
can
do
as
an
exercise
just
to
see
that
it
makes
sense.
The
attributes
is
unofficially
try
to
just
create.
You
know,
map
two
types
of
edge
things.
Let's
go
it
into
go
files.
Let's
say:
can
we
clearly
describe
using
these
attributes
the
difference
between
a
router
that
sits
at
the
edge
of
an
infrastructure
versus
a
smartphone?
A
A
We
can.
We
could
maybe
have
that
as
a
sort
of
homework
assignment
for
next
week
to
try
to
map
and
describe.
This
is
just
two
profiles
which
are,
which
are
you
know,
router,
maybe
and
and
phone
and
and
see
if
he
can
clearly
delineate
okay
I
mean
that
could
be
a
good
exercise.
But
again,
as
I
said,
I
mean
this
is
only
right.
A
We
could
end
up
defining
ten
more
and
then,
and
then
you
know
it
during
the
process
of
defining
this
face,
we
could
encounter
something
that
we
cannot
clearly
describe,
and
then
you
know
at
that
point
in
time
we
will
probably
have
to
make
a
call.
Well,
we
need
to
change
some
of
these
attributes.
We
are
we
specified
right
and,
and
then
just
you
know,
retrofit
basically.
B
A
A
A
C
Just
a
range
of
number
is
fine
because
we
talked
about
how
if
we
want
to
exercises
there
are
so
many
example.
There
are
smartphones
drawn
sensors
cameras.
There
are
just
too
many,
so
we
can
only
give
up.
Just
like
the
memory
size,
we
can
only
give
a
range
of
the
memory
size,
starting
from
maybe
32gb,
to
255
GB.
Something
like
this.
So
my
suggestion
is
that
we
go
for
quantity,
over
quality.
C
C
A
A
C
A
Work
I
mean
that,
in
context
of
splitting
up
the
work
and-
and
you
know
occurs
to
a
first
point-
individual
profiles
could
be
separate
documents
in
discussion.
Material,
yes,
I
agree.
Unless
you
maybe
make
it
official
you
I
would
imagine
we
would
collect
all
these
into
a
single
document
and
make
it
into
the
artifacts
like
as
kind
of
conclusion
or
collection
of
everything.
A
A
Artifacts
right
and
then
I
would
imagine
there
be
so
was
not
now
that
we
finish
this
work.
The
document
from
the
discussion
materials
should
make.
Should
we
have
a
you
should
have
a
version
of
the
document
over
or
master
version
that
we
agreed
on
here
as
a
you
know,
completed
and
then
move
on
to
next
one.
So
once
once
you
and
then
in
we
go
back
to
the
discussion
materials
and
then,
if
you
want
to
give
you
up
the
work
amongst
us.
A
As
for
the
definition
of
the
profiles,
then
you
know
that
could
be
multiple
documents
here
for
the
individual
profiles
to
discuss.
But
then,
as
we
as
we
once,
we
finalize
everything
we
I
would
think
we
would
collect
all
these
profiles.
Individual
profiles
into
a
single
document-
that's
just
my
just
my
kind
of
thinking
but
make.
A
A
A
A
A
A
But
in
general
I
think
I
would
like
to
make
one
more
pass
on
this
text
and
in
the
description
of
these
attributes,
first
publish
the
maybe,
if
necessary,
any
changes,
but
as
to
the
any
new
attributes.
I,
don't
see
any
any
kind
of
currently
need
for
new
attributes.
So,
okay,
so
what
else
do
we
want?
I
mean?
Obviously
we
don't
need
to
spend
a
whole
hour
here
and
in
talking
about
the
document.
If
there's
is,
there
are
no
specific
things
to
talk
about
anymore.
C
A
Yeah,
okay
sounds
good.
Well,
that
was
you
know,
sort
of
short
and
sweet,
though
I
will
I
will
now,
let's
close
it
and
then
meet
again
next
Wednesday
with
with
action
items
and
changes
that
we
invent
Final
Four
for
the
medium
Enix
minute
minutes
and
recording
I
will
post
it
up
after
this
meeting.
First
recording
in
a
minutes
afterwards
and
then
they'll
meet
again
next
Wednesday
sounds
good
great.
Okay,.