►
From YouTube: ONNX Edge WG meeting 20190626
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Just
for
the
record,
this
is
working
on
eccentric
in
group
meeting
on
June
26th
in
attendance.
Our
Milan
me
offer
surah
when
you
dong,
we
don't
know
if
anybody
else
will
join
but
based
on
past
attendance,
probably
not
so
agenda
again
for
this
meeting
is
similar
to
last
couple
of
weeks,
which
is
review,
the
our
profile,
scope
and
an
edge
definition
document,
and
hopefully
finalize
it
today
and
approve
it
for
publication.
If,
if
you
wish-
and
so
let
me
share
my
screen,
I.
B
A
See
it
now,
yes,
okay,
what
I'm
showing
is
really
the
the
document
we
have
been
reviewing
couple
of
last
week's.
So
so,
if
I
go
if
I
leave,
is
it
maybe
the
action
items
from
last
time?
The
goal
was
to
really
provide
extra
final
comments
for
this
document
and
then,
hopefully,
at
the
end
of
this
meeting,
we
decided
to
publish
or
not,
depending
on
how
we
feel
about
it
goal
is
our
statement
of
work
was
saying
the
dog
for
publishing.
A
A
A
My
my
comment
was
that
if
something
like
that
occurs,
when
we
get
go
to
the
next
step,
which
is
defining
the
actual
profiles-
and
we
find
that
something
some
some
some
dimensions-
some
attribute
is
missing
or
we
should
have
it
by
thinking-
is
that
we
should
be
able
should
be
okay
to
go
back
and
you
know
make
make
updates
to
the
actual
document.
I,
don't
think
this
is
cast
in
stone.
Whatever
we
define
right
now,
it
could
be,
it
could
be
updated
as
necessary.
Do
I
think
nobody
objects
that
right.
C
A
Okay,
yeah,
that's
a
that's
a!
We
can
do
that
efferent
Lee,
we
could
add
the
version
on
a
document
and
and
maybe
make
make
up.
Maybe
an
introduction,
a
side.
Note
saying
that
this
is
a
you
know,
a
document
that
could
change
based
on
a
you
know,
developments
as
we
as
we
proceed
with
the
further
work
in
the
state
based
on
statement
of
work
and
and
that
just
leave
it
at
that.
Okay,
so
you
don't
you
know
you
you
would
maybe
we
should
add
if
I
go
back.
A
This
document,
you
know
I,
guess
somewhere
here
we
should
at
the
top
red
version.
Just
so
I
asked
just
said
the
version
and
say
you
know
whatever
you
want
to
call
it
1.0
and
and
then
keep
keep,
keep
it
at.
That.
Okay
sounds
good,
so
this
is
a
document.
Is
here,
I
made
some
comments
this
morning
again
some
subtleties,
some
so
maybe
rewarding
I.
Hope
you
don't
mind
you
don't
in
terms
of
some
some
some
sentences
and
chapters.
A
Generally
speaking,
I
would
like
everybody's
input.
You
know
syrup
and
offers
and
everybody
else.
How
do
we
feel
about
his
document?
Is
that
I
just
what
they
want
to
have
and
what
we
want
to
publish
I'll
move
on
right,
I
I,
just
noticed
that
in
you
know
stable
word,
for
example,
we
didn't
really
mention
outers,
which
is
I,
think
good
thing
to
her,
but
instead
of
work
document
we
didn't
specify
our
authors
right
and
so
that's
fine.
We
can
cut
it
here
and
I.
Don't
have
a
problem.
A
We
can
have
that
as
an
indication
of
who
was
contributing
right,
and
so
how
do
you
want
to
proceed
with
this
I'm
thinking
we
can
go,
I
mean,
obviously
we
I'm,
you
know,
I
think
we
have
already
in
one
way
or
the
other
well
next-gen
item,
for
it
was
also
from
last
time
you
don't
get.
We
had
some
drawings.
B
A
A
A
I,
don't
think
you're,
gonna,
add
more
attributes
or
anything
here
I
mean
I,
think
we
are
set
on
the
the
these
five
attributes
right
now
that
we
defined
and
I
don't
think
we
are
gonna
change
it.
We
can,
you
know,
obviously
shoot
somebody
worthy
if
necessary,
in
terms
of
you
know
describing
them,
but
that's
that's.
Okay,.
A
C
C
A
A
One
thing
is
like
this
is
still
not
you
know.
This
is
pull
requests,
I
think
at
this
stage.
If
we
are
once
we
add
drawing
and
drawing
and
and
maybe
some
of
the
comments
I
just
made,
then
you
know
we
should
you
know
we
obviously
commit
the
issue
and
submit
them,
except
so
it
shows
up
in
a
in
a
in
a
in
a
document.
But
now
this
is
the
in
the
discussion.
If.
C
You
look
up
mingun
next
to
the
pool
request
we
can
just
you
can
have
an
issue
and
you
issue
the
just
points
to
this
pool
of
the
quest
and
I'll
see
what
you're
saying.
Okay.
So
all
you
to
continue
discussion
to
just
point
to
the
Puma
question:
safe
everybody,
okay,
just
reply
on
this
issue
and
say
that
you're,
okay
with
it
yeah.
A
So
the
once
we
once
we
again,
we
can
do
that.
That's
a
good
suggestion,
I
think
that
once
we,
you
know
committee's
full
request
it
will
show
up
in
our
discussion
material.
We
wish
it
should
be
transcribed
into
the
artifice,
because
we
said
whatever
we
publish
at
least
that
is
what
we
decided
right.
Whatever
we
publish
is.
A
Whatever
we
publish
its
gonna
go
to
artifacts
right
as
a
kind
of
state,
you
know
kind
of
plan
of
record
document,
right,
mm-hmm
and
so
I
think
once
we,
you
know,
submit
this
pull
request.
I
think
the
final
document
will
need
to
be
created
and
submitted
to
the
to
the
edge
art
folder,
and
that
includes
you
know.
You
know.
Basically,
it's
moved
from
discussions
material
to
b2b,
pull
requests.
So
after
end
of
this
meeting,
I
thought
I
think
what
I'm
going
to
do.
A
Do
you
want
to
make
one
more
update?
You
know
in
terms
of
the
comments
and
amending
the
drawings,
yeah
yeah
sure
I
can
I
would
go
with.
You
know,
submitting
pull
requests
and
then,
after
that,
the
first
point
we
can
move
to
the
an
open
issue:
essay.
Okay.
Now
we
are
in
the
face
of
approval
for
this
document
and
maybe
final
comments,
and
once
we
everybody
approves
okay,
I
accept
accept
accept.
A
F
A
So
so
one
thing
that
I'm,
if
I'm
gonna,
also
continue
with
some
more
comments
after
this
after
we
conclude
the
meeting
and
then
as
we
discussed,
we're
gonna
continue
through
through
our
guitar
over
issues
and
so
on
and
I
will
identify
next
steps.
One
thing
that
I
just
want
to
bring
up
that
I
remembered
and
it's
like
people
that
that
came
from
steering
committee
really
I,
think
I.
A
By
steering
committee
and
under
six,
if
you
notice
now,
there
is
similarly
to
two
working
groups.
We
put
there
is
a
64,
and
this
is
the
the
place
or
the
six.
We
said
we
are
going
to
collaborate
with
the
several
SIG's
right
in
and
one
of
the
six
that
we
have
to
cooperate,
we
shall
we
should
is
in
context
of
quantization.
Is
operations
sick
now,
in
meantime,
there
is
a
six
Depot
and
you
can
see.
Operators
and
converters
are
two
kind
of
cigs
currently
play
put
in
place.
A
So
structure
here
is
very
similar
to
to
structure
that
was
started
with
the
working
groups,
repo
and
I-
think
the
lots
of
logistics
really
were
adopted
from
whatever
we
defined
here,
working
at
also
Yonex
and
so
on.
Operators.
You
know,
there's
meetings
and
all
that
stuff
very
similar
to
what
we
have,
which
is
great
and
so
there's
some
structure
all
over
and
in
the
mean
and
then.
A
Best
practices
for
things
that
Russian
was
asked
by
these
guys.
It's
fin
committee,
whether
these
kind
of
rules
make
sense
and
should
there
be
adopted
as
a
general
rules.
Best
practices
for
working
groups
as
well
and
I
just
replied:
I,
don't
see
a
problem
because
you're
only
doing
this
right
so
from
from
our
perspective,
it's
about
meeting
notes
about
meeting,
recording
that
about
publishing
agenda
and
so
on.
Right,
so
just
wanted
to
bring
this
to
your
attention
so
that
you
are
aware
of
this.
A
And
then
there's
architecture,
infrastructure,
sig,
and
that
is
what
we
would
need
to
work.
The
thing
we
will
need
to
work
within
the
context
of
compliance
I
did
get
this
clarification
from
from
from
pissant
from
steering
committee.
So,
but
having
said
that,
there
is
the
the
actual
operator
six
started
to
be
active
and
they
had
their
first
meeting
last
two
weeks
ago.
A
A
A
Right
because
this
son
sounds
like
it
could
overlap
or
or
be
correlated
to
our
edge
profiles,
because
now
this
discussions,
we
said
the
part
of
the
edge
definition
edge
profile
definition
is
going
to
be
set
of
operators
and
be
nice
to
see
how
much
this
aligns
and
we
don't
wants
to
kind
of
duplicate
work.
You
know
if
they
are
going
to
be
defining
of
organizing
operators
into
domains.
That
technically
mean
edge
profiles.
A
C
Maybe
another
way,
another
I'm
going
a
question
to
that.
If
you
look
at
the
attendees
of
this
yeah,
it's
much
bigger
attendance,
so
yeah
dog
I,
don't
see
anyone
from
there.
Some
wondering
if,
if
you
want
someone
from
Huawei
to
also
attend
it,
that's
one
thing,
and
similarly
so
about
you
familiar
with
the
people
who
are
attending
in
this
yeah.
C
A
So
I
think
that's
why
I
want
to
dial
in
today
just
to
kind
of
bring
this
to
their
attention.
If
it
comes
to
the
point,
and
basically
there
is
so
next
meeting,
which
is
today
they
say,
organised
operatives,
but
the
man
will
be
on
a
agenda
meeting.
You
know
today
and
so
they'll
see
what
happens
and
you
know
just
have
you
know
it's
good
to
everybody
be
in
tune
on
this,
so
you
know
through
direct
interaction
with
your
colleagues
at
work
or
not
right.
Some.
A
A
What
you
see
here
next
meeting
is
well,
it
should
be
now
in
two
weeks
and
I
think
I
think
that
that's
okay
by
the
by
you
know
our
goal
is
to
define
document
by
July
1st.
So
we
still
have
a
few
days,
and
you
know,
even
if
it
feels
a
little
bit,
that
I
think
that's
okay
and
so
I,
don't
think
we
need
to
meet
meeting
next
week.
Pass
next
meeting
is,
is
Wednesday
July
3rd
and
that's
just
day
before
July
4th,
which
is
a
fun
day
here
in
us.
A
F
A
Interesting
why'd
that
happen.
Okay,
do
you
see
now?
Yes,
okay,
so
yeah,
so
the
the
next
next
steps
would
be
about
the
you
know.
So
if
you
have
a
meeting
in
two
weeks,
then
you
know,
I
would
like
to
have
this
as
a
topic
on
agenda
to
have
some
test
profiles,
because
this
is
our
next
step
anyway.
Yeah.
A
We
do
that
I
do
that,
and
so
we
have
maybe
two
test
profiles
and
can
have
a
have
a
discussion
on
the
content,
content
and
format
right
and
and
then
we
will
once
we
have
these,
we
I
think
the
next
time.
We
also
should
discuss
what
other
edge
profiles
we
should
define
and
then
I
would
like
to
divvy
up
the
work
right.
A
A
It
seems
like
ice
clicked,
stop
share
there.
Okay,
so
yeah
I
mean
I'm,
gonna
I,
don't
think
we
need
to
spend
more
time
here
we
discuss.
How
are
we
gonna
proceed
and
you
don't
hopefully
today
we'll
be
able
to
make
updates
in
the
document?
No
problem
these
updates
are
pushed
into.
The
PRI
will
then
go
ahead
and
submit
and
commit
the
PR
into
the
repo
and
then
you'll
continue
to
the
issue
to
the
issue.
Discussion
in
a
github
to
complete
and
accept
the
document
into
artifice.
Yeah
sounds
good
yep,
okay,
well,
30
minutes!
F
A
A
C
Clarify
it's
not
going
to
be
a
we
defined.
You
know
a
high-level,
detailed
definition
of
offering,
but
it's
more
to
the
next
meeting
we
just
to
test
that
the
attributes
are
walking
and
in
how
to
express
different
types
of
devices
make
sense.
So
it's
not
that
I'm
going
to
come
up
with
two
documents
which
are
very
detail
describing
two
profiles:
yeah.