►
From YouTube: Leadership Development Training
Description
See working document at OSE Leadership Development - http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/OSE_Leadership_Development. With Laura's Team Leader Training - http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/Team_Leader_Training.
To put this into context, see http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/2015_First_Quarter_Review
For seminal work on collaborative literacy, see http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/Collaborative_Literacy_Framework_Overview
A
Leadership:
development
with
andreas
jonathan
and
marcin
we're
talking
about
so
presence
again
stitute
as
a
potential
leadership,
training
model
we're
talking
about
leadership,
training,
culture,
training,
project
management,
training.
Here
we
have
a
leadership
development
document,
we're
working
on
we're.
Looking
at
page
7
or
page
7
or
page
8,
now
we're
looking
at
page
8.
A
And
rest
tell
us
continue
going
and
but
before
we
go
further,
do
we
are
we
in
agreement
that
we
want
to
divide
this,
so
there's
leadership,
culture,
project
management?
Are
we
trying
to
wrap
them
into
one?
Do
you
want
to
expand
this
document
or-
or
this
is
let's
just
talk
about
leadership
here
for
now
or
do
we
want
to
make
the
link
to
culture
and
project.
A
B
A
B
C
B
B
A
B
Under
web
page,
you
can
already
look
around
a
bit
and
they
have
many
to
us,
which
day
let
out
for
a
some
many
of
the
tools,
there's
open
source
and
they
also
have
a
blink
a
couple
of
books
in
the
systemic
solutions.
India
process,
there's,
if
you
refuse
the
first
model,
egypt,
every
and
them,
if
you're
more
interested
in
how
it
relates
to
the
economy
eager
to
make
assistant
summer
book.
B
B
A
B
A
E
C
E
C
E
Mean
it
essentially
review
proposes
the
quality
results.
You
know
our
affected
by
any
kind
of
social
system
as
a
function
of
quality
awareness,
attention
and
consciousness
that
we
just
spent
in
the
system
operate
trauma.
So
it
seems
like
it's
definitely
stemming
from
some
of
the
similar
types
of
thinking,
just
in
a
different
presentation
and
framework,
which
I
think
is
really
great,
identifying
blind
spot
setting
or
a
huge
part.
So.
E
A
C
B
B
C
B
B
Then
we
have
the
ones
which
I
originally
thought
about,
which
are
useful
in
which
are
well-researched
would
be
the
seventh
leadership,
situational
leadership
and
leader
member
exchange.
Seventh
leadership
is
quite
easy
for
people
to
find
about
them.
You
can
also
find
books
which
combined
servant
leadership
with
scrum
methodology,
for
example,
and
it's
also
something
which
which
not.
B
C
C
B
C
B
D
A
Yeah
yeah,
and
we
can
also,
of
course,
reference
best
practices
so
that,
when
there's
questions
about
process,
we
can
say
hey
know
that
this
process
has
been
shown
to
work.
Well
like
this.
For
so
that
we
can
ask
answer,
questions
from
experience
from
others
experience
building
upon
others,
experience
which
definitely
helps
in
a
free-thinking
crowd.
B
To
choose
from
like
the
situational:
maybe
it's
not
the
most
wealth
or
prove
out
there
if
it's
something
which
most
people
have
heard
of
an
infinity
for
new
leaders
to
to
look
at
it
them
and
realize
thats
the
one
the
one
day
you
leave
today,
actually
there
they
need
to
grow
when
they
need
to
get
time
to
get
into
their
new
situation.
So
it
is
quite
good
for
when
you
leave
yourself,
calm,
mm-hmm.
C
A
Well,
we
should
know
it
so
I
think
we
should
definitely
be
very
specific
about
okay,
here's
the
different
things
we
have
on
a
plate,
and
how
do
we
I
think?
We
should
architect
that,
since
we
know
the
requirements
of
the
process
most
closely,
we
should
architect
that
and
then,
of
course
have
feedback,
but
start
with
a
solid
foundation
that
we
propose
that
we
bring
to
the
table.
C
C
B
C
B
B
C
A
C
A
C
B
B
B
C
A
The
seminal
work,
like
it's
good
so
so
far
ever
we
do
here
to
make
this
sound,
we
should
we
should
expose
what
is
the
seminal
book
on
a
topic
and
perhaps
for
for
current
relevance?
Is
there
an
institute
or
entity?
That's
doing
that
right
now
and
do
they
resonate
with
us
and
should
we
contact
I,
Union,
I
guess
at
best
we
can
so
get
create,
so
we're
doing
leadership
development.
A
If
you
want
to
borrow
points
from
different
these
different
theories,
we
should
talk
to
the
leaders
of
these
movements
and
invite
them
into
ose
as
an
advisory
capacity,
meaning
one
to
two
hours
per
month
of
discussion
and
advisory
work.
Mm-Hmm
such
that
we
can
nail
down
like
if
they're,
very
helpful
and
I
can
mail
us,
you
know,
help
us
nail
down.
Some
practices
are
adapting
specifically
or
get
that
you
know
the
insights
from
the
the
people
who
have
been
doing
this.
That's
that's
how
you
want
to
work.
A
C
C
A
A
First
of
all,
we
should
read
what's
available
and
assess
that,
and
then,
if
we're
informed,
we
should
contact
them
not
just
like
upfront,
but
we
should
study
their
material
a
little
bit
see
what
we
want
to
expand
on
and
then
we
can
have
a
meaningful
conversation
with
them
like
we
have.
Then
we
gain
that
authority
to
say:
hey.
We
looked
at
your
stuff.
We
want
to
go
further,
yeah
yeah,
so
so
you
should
do
here
is
keep.
E
Be
the
biggest
thing
right
now
is
a
matter
of
application,
and
how
can
we
use
this
right
now
in
terms
of
what
we
need
to
go
in
terms
of
execute
been
having
a
leadership
program
is
going
to
be
great
and
getting
some
very
basic,
general
content
and,
of
course,
doing
an
assessment.
Getting
a
needs
analysis
of
where
we
are
I
mean
one
of
the
stuff
that
we're
going
to
do
is
going
to
be
very
out-of-the-box.
A
C
E
And
now
that's
lets
them
come
down
to,
because
a
lot
of
the
stuff
is
for
different
types
of
situations
or
even
different
organizations,
and
given
that
we're
a
highly
engaged
volunteer
organization,
you
know
it's
going
to
require.
You
know
a
little
bit
unique
dispositions.
So
in
terms
of
execution
right
now
we're
looking
at
the
groups
that
we
already
have
yeah.
E
A
Not
a
hundred
full-time
leaders
hundred
contributor
full-time
equivalent,
so
that
probably
would
indicate
ten
liters.
You
know
I'm
saying
Devon
are
ya.
You
know
10
20,
maybe
but
enough
leadership
that
that
a
group
can
exist
and
work
effectively
under
each
leader
with
each
leader.
The
leader
as
a
facilitator,
I
mean.
E
It
goes
into
the
establishing
what
are
going
to
our
protocols
in
working
groups
and
teams
and
dealing
with
the
virtual
constraints,
vs
face-to-face
constraints
and
when
you're
doing
with
leadership
development.
It's
one
thing
to
do
it
over
the
fall
I
mean
in
person.
It's
another
thing
when
you're
doing
it
all
over
a
webinar
there's
a
lot
of
human
dynamics
that
are
missing
out
in.
E
C
C
E
I
think
that's
where
you're
going
to
have
the
most
effective
times
in
terms
of
being
full
relationships
and
meaningful
impact
and
develop
and
cohesive
relationships
each
other,
but
terms
of
quality
and
content
in
getting
the
methodology,
or
you
say
the
theory
down
or
at
least
a
knowledge
management
down.
I
think
this
is
great
to
give
people
a
basic
knowledge
of
you
know
what
we're
kind
of
looking
for
what
is
our
approach
and
how
we?
A
Yeah,
so
so
right
now,
I
think
the
relevant
question
is
so
undresses
you're
doing
good
work
in
doing
this
background,
research
and
then
application.
So
so,
let's
say
what
is:
let's
maybe
focus
on
us.
Okay.
So
if
we
have
a
leadership
training
program,
let's
say
we
do
a
a
first
webinar
for
I
mean
we
have
to
scope
this
out.
What
what
is
the
goal?
A
We're
talking
about
a
team
leader
for
say
the
aquaponics
group
or
any
other
group,
so
we're
saying:
okay,
here's
what
you
need
as
far
as
the
this
and
where
we
should.
We
probably
be
writing,
as
is
a
curriculum
for
webinars,
so
maybe
say:
okay,
what
webinar
number
one!
This
is
what
we
covered
now
with
Laura.
We
started
going
over
that
and
maybe
we
should
work
from
her
document,
because
there
we
already
have
some
initial
ideas
that
she
was
going
to
cover.
So
maybe,
let's
pull
up
pull
up
that
document
and
build
from
that.
E
E
D
A
B
Yeah
I:
this
will
be
big
in
parallel
Jesus,
and
this
will
be
more
about
the
collaboration
I'll.
Try
to
use
this
as
participative
observation
so
still
get
some
kind
of
himself.
For
example,
when
you
how
you
do
when
you
still
choose
to
work
with
other
organizations,
so
it's
quite
good
actually
that
you
talk
now
about
how
you
you
would
engage
in
deeds.
Let's
say
you're
looking
for
subject
matter,
experts
and.
E
B
C
B
E
E
D
E
E
A
A
D
A
A
A
Because
I
think
what
we
need
to
do
is
and,
as
we
talked
with
her,
we
take
the
standard
leadership,
training
materials
that
apply
to
anybody
and
we
refactor
it
for
open
culture
for
for
collaborative
literacy,
because
that
is
not
because
collaborative
literacy
is
not
an
explicit
goal
of
the
materials
of
the
approach.
So
we
have
to
add
that
onto
the.
A
A
A
Yeah
and
these
little
points
like
what
work
sorry
just
to
make
a
point-
I
mean
this
is
exactly
what
we're
talking
about.
This
is
the
difference
of
you
know
like
us,
scrambling
around
looking
for
things
versus
the
culture
being
clear.
It's
like
BAM,
you
just
you
know
where
to
find
everything,
because
everyone's
got
that
in
their
mindset
that
you're
not
working
on
us
alone
and
that's
a
pervasive
mindset
that
we
need
to
inculcate
to
all
the
people
working
with
us.
So
we
just
facilitate
progress.
Yeah.
E
A
A
A
That
have
aspects
of
openness
there
I
mean
I,
just
haven't
seen
some
of
them
in
any
other
place
that
that
exists.
So,
but
we
want
to
learn,
learn
the
standards
that
wicked
wikimedia
foundation
has
linux
foundation,
also
eclipse
con
eclipse
foundation.
There's
a
few
leaders
in
the
field
that
we
need
to
learn
all
that
they
do
and
we
can
bring
in
Ben
kabhi
he's
the
community
manager
for
eclipse
foundation.
We
can
bring
them
into
the
table
to
help
us.
E
E
C
E
A
A
B
C
C
B
Well,
what
what
my
dad
is,
our
in
my
motivation
can
be
critical
to
know
that
I
intend
to
build
a
similar
community
here
in
Sweden,
and
it's
I
want
to
have
a
community
where
different
forms
of
open
source
development
can
be
in
one
place
and
were
different.
Type
of
organizations
who
work
under
the
same
values
under
single
source
values
can
work
kind
of
under
one
roof,
so
yeah.
B
C
B
C
B
A
B
B
C
A
We're
going
to
so
here
what
we're
going
to
try
to
do
is
30
acres,
150
people
as
the
as
the
capacity
of
a
highly
functional
autonomous
settlement
or
basically
a
model
model
city
or
such
model
village.
But
that's
that's
our
current
view
in
terms
of
Dunbar's
number,
which
is
150
and
the
monkey
sphere
so-called
see
that
on
facebook
and
enough
up
fertility
and
natural
resource
moisture
enough
rock
and
soil
that
you
can
feed
the
population
provide
energy
provide
natural
resources.
A
For
other
parts,
so
basically
really
try
to
max
out
the
GV
CS
tools
for
building
and
running
this
integrated
house
green
house,
so
you've
got
food
and
energy
production,
definitely
but
basically
a
big
30
day
event
where
we
bring
about
a
hundred
people
to
factory
farm
and
have
a
really
ambitious,
build
out.
So
we're
going
to
focus
on
getting
all
the
tools
ready
for
that
after
this
year,
problem
in
October
mid-october
I'd
like
to
pretty
much
transition
fully
to
planning
out
that
event.
A
Right
now,
of
course,
we're
getting
ancillary
tools
for
that
event,
but
that
might
get
you
if
you're
serious
in
pursuing
the
land-based
facility
that
the
land,
the
land
requirement
question,
is
always
a
big
one
but
I
think
the
bottom
line.
It's
got
to
be
a
kind
of
like
a
long-term
perspective
or
where,
in
many
places,
you're
gonna
have
to
rebuild
regenerate
like
at
our
place
that
our
agriculture
here
could
hardly
support
any
people
right
now.
A
But
when
you
get
the
earthworks
and
water
retention
and
fertility
back
up
I,
don't
think
we're
going
to
have
any
problem
with
thriving
with
150
people
from
from
local
resources.
Right
now,
we
maybe
can
do
like
maybe
30
at
the
present,
but
we
really
need
to
improve
the
full
biological
and
ecological
life
here
and,
of
course,
develop
Messines
and
infrastructures,
but
yeah.
A
C
F
A
Our
case,
we
we
typically
talk
about
a
standard
farm
scale
of
40
acres.
If
we
talk
about
a
village
village
model,
so
we're
going
to
try
to
do
that
at
factory
farm
as
far
as
with
it.
So
that's
the
Gulf
or
within
10
years
to
see
whether
a
full
ose
campus
can
be
built
like
that
as
a
first
step
to
potentially
vaio
replication
worldwide.
A
B
A
Right,
that's
just
a
physical
community.
Virtual,
of
course,
is
larger.
I
would
say
that
just
basic
survive,
you
kind
of
like
productivity
figures.
I
think
per
acre
and
I
mean
especially
depends
how
you
do
it,
but
I
mean
with
depending
on
how
you
do
agriculture.
You
can
feed
a
varying
number
of
people
like,
for
example,
aquaponics
is
going
to
be
very
much
much
more
intense
production,
but
we
can.
We
can
think
of,
like
about
a
thousand
square
feet,
producing
all
the
agriculture
actually
per
person.
A
It
would
actually
turn
out
to
be
in
our
model
with
aquaponics
greenhouse
we're
actually
considering
250
square
feet
per
person
from
aquaponics
to
feed
a
pretty
much
a
full
diet.
So
if
we
extend
it
to
the
acre
scale
or
hectare,
scale,
we're
talking
about
there's
40,000,
let's
see
40
times
for
you're,
actually
talking
about
160
people
per
acre
being
fully
supported
using
aquaponics
for
food
production.
A
So
so
the
theoretical
limits
of
sustainability
on
a
parcel
of
land
are
actually
probably
several
factor
of
several
higher
than
the
150,
probably
like
a
like
a
factor
of
10
44.
Actually,
even
prospering
we're
going
to
keep
it
very
resilient,
so
we
don't
run
into
so
150,
I
think,
is
a
very
resilient
number
that
can
sustain
itself
without
ever
pressing
the
limits
of
the
system.
So
that's
how
we're
looking
at
it.
C
A
A
About
design,
so
actually
we
right
now
we're
looking
at
very
low
energy
systems
in
order
to
make
that
happen,
but
yeah
what
I
was
concerned
was
just
the
food.
The
max
limit
would
be
a
hundred
sixty
four
food,
but
then,
of
course,
you've
got
fuel
fuel
needs,
so
it
depends
how
how
much
you
want
to
be
traveling,
but
energy
needs
I
think
are
pretty
clear.
A
That's
that
you
don't
need
so
much
area
for
but
heating
and
and
energy
like
energy,
for
travel
like
depending
how
much
you
want
to
travel
would
be
a
big
deal
perhaps
but
okay.
These
are
just
kind
of
like
some
round
figures
where
we
stand
at
150.
People
for
30
acres
should
be
a
and
a
great
example
of
prosperity
without
hitting
limits.
A
D
C
B
B
So,
there's
quite
quite
good
place
to
set
up
babe
this
type
of
facility,
because
you
know
a
lot
of
people
who
are
engaged
in
several
projects
and
trying
to
get
them
engaged
also
might
might
give
them
leg
experienced
it.
Also,
the
open-source
development
push
once
the
facilities
are
up
and
running
it.
C
D
A
Uh-Huh
very
nice,
so
we
should
probably
involve
you
it
because
we're
looking
at
we're
developing
some
chapter
standard.
So
we'll
get
you
in
on
a
conversation
because
we
want
to
find
out
our
stakeholders.
What
are
the
needs
of
our
chapters,
people?
How
does
obviously
support
them?
And
and
how
did
the
chapters
move
the
movement
forward?
That's
good,
too!
Mm-Hmm.
C
C
B
A
E
C
E
C
A
So
the
curriculum
we
should
be
I
think
that's
what
we
should
be
talking
about
so
yeah
excellent
excellent.
I
mean
that's
good
to
quantify
the
specific
goals
for
about
March
March
2016
about
a
year
from
now
end
of
March,
let's
say
or
the
beginning
of
march,
maybe
around
March
of
2016,
so
I
think
we
can
do.
E
A
D
A
C
C
A
C
D
B
E
E
Governance
and
being
able
to
find
the
balance
between
the
individual
and
the
group
and
keeping
the
minority
from
being
a
from
leveraging
their
power
in
stopping
the
decision-making
process
to
even
a
consensus
getting
in
the
group
think
so
the
saucy
accuracy
and
even
the
theory
of
use.
It
seems
very
interesting
because
it's
really
pressing
the
envelope
of
social
networks
or
social
framework
thing
in
the
decision-making
process,
where
you
have
to
certain
people
that
not
delay
the
progress
in
when
we're
doing
concurrent
engineering.
E
E
C
E
B
E
I,
do
I,
just
have
been
very,
very
busy
I've
been
sending
off
it's
still
recovering
and
I
got
your
facebook
message.
I
just
I've
got
a
whole
list.
We
want
you
to
respond
to
you
just
be
living
out
of
commission
for
the
last
couple.
Eat
them
so
well,
but
definitely
want
to
know
Phil
whatever
it.
Whatever
things
you
need
for
me
in
10,
what
you
need
to
do
so.
C
C
A
C
C
D
D
A
I
would
shoot
for
I
should
probably
shoot
for
two
weeks
from
now.
I
mean
not
not
yet,
but
I
mean.
Let's
see
if
we
develop
some
of
this.
That
means
we
work.
Yeah
I
mean
we
can,
if
Flores
back
on
track,
I
mean
basically
starting
from
her
document
than
the
collaborative
literacy.
I.
Think
we
should
do
is
I
mean
the
collaborative
literacy
is
very
high
on
my
agenda
right
now,
because
I
simply
became
really
aware
of
how
that's
been
a
bottleneck.
A
Actually
so
I
think
I
can
prepare
that
relatively
quickly
like
in
a
week
or
so.
It's
basically
right
saying:
okay,
here's
our
culture,
how
we
actually
you
know
whenever
we
do
a
google
doc
or
this
or
that
when
we
talk
to
each
other.
This
is
how
we
operate,
because
people
are
just
not
clear
about
that.
That's.
A
A
E
F
E
Most
people
going
to
learn
to
application
anyway,
but
it
also
doesn't
do
what
the
curriculum
is
going
to
look
like
to
determine
what
they're
actually
going
to
be
doing
then
depends
on
how
granular
or
what
what
specific,
we're
looking
for
some
and
that's
kind
of
a
wide
scope.
I
mean
there's
a
huge
scope
but
narrowing
it
down
to
what
we
want
to
accomplish.
E
A
A
But
to
what
extent
do
we
push
that
with?
How
is
that
built
into
our
process
like
who
has
to
follow?
Because,
obviously
people
who
are
outside
the
organization
we
don't
have
to
bring
them
in
unless
we
know
that
they're
going
to
be
a
close
collaborator,
but
so
yeah
there's
the
third
realm
of
just
encouraging
the
for
King,
actually
see
for
King
for
king
and
and
pull
requests
actually
so
that
what
I
mean
by
that
is.
A
We
want
to
actively
encourage
those
those
people
who
are
working
on
things,
but
maybe
they
don't
either
we
don't
have
the
energy
or
the
topic
is
just
different.
We
encourage
them
to
say,
okay,
take
our
collaboration,
standards
just
take
the
template
and
then
come
back
to
our
wiki
with
documenting
stuff
and
then,
if,
if
there's
basically.
E
A
Yeah
yeah
and
if,
if
someone
want
someone's
like
hey
I've,
got
this
crazy
project
out
there,
but
you
know
it's
not
osc
machines,
but
it
actually
like
it's
highly
relevant
to
osc,
and
it's
it's
a
it's
got
pieces
that
we
like.
We
encourage
them
to
come
to
our
platform
or
we
just
encourage
them
to
documented
if
it's
not
documented.
So
we
encourage
pull
request
is
part
of
it,
but
the
other
part
is
incur
the
concept
of
encouraging
documentation
of
other
other
projects.
A
Other
related
projects,
because
right
now
we're
missing
out
on
a
whole
bunch
of
stuff
like
right
now,
I
haven't
really
been
encouraging.
Others
to
say:
hey,
look
you!
We
got
these
resources
document
your
stuff
at
our
place.
Here's
the
tools,
so
we
need
to
generate
that
tool
kit,
because
we're
missing
out
a
lot
of
contributions
that
are
relevant
actually
other
related
contributions.
Yeah.
So
basically,
as
you
said,
tune
kit,
you.
E
A
Which,
which
refers
to
I,
mean
not
everyone
wants
to
do
it
right,
because
most
people
are
just
not
interested
in
any
useful
source
documentation,
but
there
are
those
who
are
very
open
to
it
and
for
those
that
are
we,
we
have
to
create
a
space
for
it.
That's
been
a
gap
that
I
notice
that
we
haven't
mean
initially
I
try
to
encourage
people
to
do
it.
A
E
A
E
E
I
walk
about
it
to
where
people
just
get
it
I
mean
can't
be
like
the
news
kit,
or
just
have
an
interview,
kind
of
back
and
forth
in
that
sense
to
where
you
know,
let's
talk
about
useful
source.
What
is
that?
Why
is
it
different?
How
is
it
different
from
using
inspirational
source
in
what
kind
of
communities
do
we
find
that
in
know.
C
E
We
seeing
up
with
us
going
rapidly
as
we
would
like
it
to
and
then
again
that's
going
to
be
some
of
the
dialogue
that
goes
along
with
it.
It's
going
to
open
people's
minds
saying
okay!
This
is
why
it's
not
working.
Why
is
documentation
now?
Documentation
is
absolutely
critical
to
harnessing
open
source
of
capacity
mmhmm.
A
A
D
D
E
C
C
A
Yeah
and
that's
something
we
have
not
really
seen
much
of
anywhere.
You
know
this.
What
we're
discussing
right
now,
it's
just
such
a
frontier
to
be
tapped-
and
you
know
everyone
else
is
talking
about
whatever
the
anything
just
just
about
a
new
discussion
to
hear
about
their
it's
implicitly
concentrated
and
still
in
an
old
paradigm.
A
E
B
A
This
goes
into
so
so
it's
kind
of
several
things
coming
together
by
thing:
the
the
method
that
we're
migrating
to
is
the
open
source
consortium
concept,
where
we
bring
in
leaders
around
the
table
to
spawn
projects
that
then
become
that
start
to
go
on
it
on
their
own.
Of
course,
the
governance
there
is
tricky,
because
how
do
you
bring
a
bunch
of
leaders
like
who
owns
it
right
up
front?
A
Who
owns
that
I
mean
who's
the
real
owner,
if
we're
inviting
people
to
a
consortium
to
an
open
consortium
and
I
think
the
the
the
answers
is
clear
if
we
position
that
as
hey
we've
got
these
this,
this
collaborative
literacy
this
this
open
process
that
we're
interested,
we
develop
the
capacity
to
run
an
open
process
in
this
consortium,
and
we
let
it
go
from
there
right.
So
the
worship
is
we're
just
pretty
much
I
guess
using
the
words
we
learned
today
and
leader
exchange
was
it
member
exchange
where
people
coming
in
well.
A
First
of
all,
people
are
brought
into
the
table
to
take
leadership,
but
but
the
power
conflict
comes
from
okay,
what
happens
when
scarce
resources
are
now
on
a
table
like
okay?
We
like
who's
gonna,
be
you
know,
whatever
gained
the
fame
or
whatever
power
from
this
well
know
where
it's
not
about
us
gaining
power,
that
the
core
principle
is
it's
a
distributive
process.
A
We
set
up
a
process
whereby
power
can
be
distributed
and
dad
I
think
that
principle,
no
I
think
is
a
strong
one
to
go
on
in
terms
of
governance
like
how
do
you
how
to
get
people
to
agree
to
what
the
fruit
is?
And
then
the
people
have
to
agree
to
the
fruit
is,
if
you
have
the
open
plans
and
that's
that's
the
power
that
they
have
to
understand
the
distributive
economic
model,
so
so
within.
A
Basically,
within
the
consortium
open
consortium,
I
guess
we
need
to
train
the
people
up
front
about
what
this
distributive
power
collaborative
literacy
is
I
mean
the
collaborative
literacy
needs
to
include
the
distributive
economic
goals
at
the
core
of
that
for
people
to
to
do
it,
because
we
actually
ran
into
some
issues
with
it
already
on
people
who
we
thought
were
absolutely
absolutely
go.
It
turned
out.
You
know
they
didn't
necessarily
subscribe
to
the
distributive
economic
model.
You
know
so
so
that
that
clarity
is
paramount,
but
I
think
it.
C
B
B
B
Yeah
I
mean
you
can
try
like
this.
You
can
do
it
in
iterations,
basically
and
see
what
type
of
questions
get
like
you
do
it
as
clear
as
possible.
You
can
clean
up
for
some
people
and
see
if
they
have
any
questions
and
then
and
then
you
will
probably
notice
if
you
always
get
the
same
question
over
and
over
again,
mm-hmm.
B
A
A
A
Learning
organization
infrastructure,
what
what
mechanism
is
already
putting
in
for
capturing
the
feedback
and
all
that
I
mean
first
thing
comes
to
my
mind,
is
discuss,
or
this
discuss,
avoided
discussion
below
any
on
any
platform
if
it's
on
the
wiki
or
I
mean
also
just
various
ways
to
capture
surveys,
just
just
little
feedback
forms
or
just
listening
in
a
setting
up
space
in
the
process
to
further
explicitly
for
feedback
no
merece.
Nobody
I
definitely
need
to
acknowledge
that
I.
D
B
Within
your
open
project
management
framework,
you
that
there
should
be
some
kind
of
reflection,
always
Indians
lessons
firms,
so
that
you
did
an
integrated
parts
of
your
projects.
Energy,
always
look
fruit,
and
not
only
if
you
reach
the
goals
that
also
bought
the
projects
and
and
it's
about
these
systems.
They
get
Bob
single,
double
loop
learning
both
for
the
teams
and
also
for
the
organization
and.
A
D
A
Do
that
way,
I
take
a
look
at
that.
That's
useful
I
link
that
there
too,
okay,
yeah,
okay,
so
learning
organization,
okay,
so
we'll
prepare
the
materials
will
set
a
first
training
date
as
early
as
two
weeks
from
now
it'll
be
just
about
time.
I
mean
yeah
I
mean
that's
really
shoot
for,
like
two
weeks
from
now.
First
webinar
right.
C
D
E
Think
there's
there's
two
different
segments,
their
leadership
in
terms
of
the
organization
and
then,
of
course,
facilitators
leadership,
facilitation,
king
of
military,
which
I
think
is
the
second
and
slur
leg
to
that's
where
people
that
want
to
be
involved
in
a
project
can
actually,
you
know,
take
on
the
training,
even
as
a
function
for
them
to
to
be
engaged
at
some
level
but
finance
an
essential
function.
You.
E
C
D
C
B
D
A
Who's
helping
us,
and
so
she
was
drawing
out
the
actual
curriculum
which
which
the
concept
was
like,
for
example,
the
thing
that's
linked
in
his
document
Laura's
document
that
was
the
first
one
they
were
like
46
that
we
proposed
I
was
going
to
take
a
look
at
that
and
pretty
much
refactor
it
for
collaborative
literacy,
just
really
the
osc
slant
on
it
wherever
possible,
and
we
use
that
as
the
course
material.
So
that's
what
we
were
thinking
about.
A
D
B
Like
also,
I
don't
know
how
much,
because
it's
really
also
depending
on
from
what
you
want
so,
for
example,
when
it
comes
to
protect
national,
it's
really
wait
which
type
of
price
you
have.
If
you
really
have
that
yet
right
and
these
type
of
things,
so
the
risk
is
that
you
put
up
a
curriculum
and
you
give
training
methodology
for
let's
say
a
GI
tract
and
without
first
making
sure
that
you
actually
do
have
edged
up
rights
and
also
looking
at
what
what
type
of
uncertainties
you
have
to
seek.
B
B
A
A
We
haven't,
but
that's
that's.
The
concept
I
think
we're
pursuing
is
is
that
we
take
her
material
and
adapted
to
the
specific
case
of
OSE
lens
seis,
but
you
know
say:
can
you
have
case
examples?
Okay?
This
is
how
this
applies
in
aquaponics.
This
is
on
the
micro
tractor,
the
graphics
working
group,
so
so
I
think
that's
where
we're
at
right
now
we're
taking
the
materials
and
refactoring
it
for
the
OSC
case
you
focusing
on
a
typical
needs
of
OSC
in
terms
of
yeah
yeah,
the
specific
condition
for
OC,
but
you're
right.
It's
like.
A
E
C
E
Well,
the
development
method
itself
is
one:
we
bring
everything
to
a
very
granular
level
to
allow
for
people
to
engage
I.
You
know
in
viewing
the
East
micro
tasks
in
creating
a
framework
or
final
two
to
get
people
into
that
framework
into
the
follow.
The
protocols
is
part
of
our
challenges,
but
that
just
goes
with
communication
and
collaboration.
Literacy.
E
A
It's
really
it's
like
really
I
mean
I
got
a
bit
basically
spilett.
You
know
like
based
on
Laura's
document
star
refactoring
it
Jonathan.
Maybe
you
can
also
start
refactoring
that,
but
it's
really
taking
the
experiences
and
challenges
that
we
had
so
far
and
when
we
teach
these
skills,
we
focus
on
addressing
the
the
gaps
that
we
have
already
seen,
yeah,
where
I
mean
eventually
like
as
you
get
familiar
with
our
process
here,
you
can
help
us,
but
you'd
have
to
start
getting
involved
in
a
different.
Actual
working
is
like
right
now.
We're
talking
about
training.
A
You'd
also
have
to
see
the
actual
process
of
how
a
particular
project
goes
forward.
So
it
would
be
good
for
you
too,
if
you
want
to
get
start
drawing
up
these
documents
with
us,
you
want
to
get
involved
in
some
other
group
that
we
have.
If
you
I,
don't
know
if
you
have
the
time
but
but
and
but
right
now,
it's
definitely
useful
to
based
on
what
you
know
to
start
trying
to
refactor
these
techniques.
For
the
issues
that
you
see
right,
I
think
I
think
you
can
keep
adding
value
to
this
leadership.
A
A
So
because
we
want
to
take
this
document
and
say:
okay,
this
is
the
various
industry
standards
they're
already
there
and
we're
adapting
it
to
the
particular
issues
that
we
see,
and
you
know
you
know
you
know
just
a
little
bit.
You
know
you're
learning
about
what
we're
doing
so.
You
can
start
doing
some
form
of
adaptation
already
right,
which
you
are
so
that's.
What's
good,
we
continue
working
on
that.
What
you
can
in
terms
of
sniffing
out
the
relevant
elements
from
all
these
techniques.
You
know
and
maybe
saying
like
taking.
A
A
We
typically
run
in
our
approaches
this
and
that
this
is
why
this
system
is
relevant.
You
know
so
just
really
start
translating
all
these,
because
I
think
there's
going
to
be
a
little
bit
like
you
know,
for
any
one
of
these
we
can
say,
oh,
but
there's
this
one
process
that
we
really
do
as
well,
and
we,
like
the
concept
of
mash
up
mashup,
is
critical
to
our
operating
procedures.
We
take
industry
standards
and
mash
them
up
in
ways
that
have
yeah.
A
So
so
we
can
go
through
each
of
these
and
maybe
add
more
and
we
say
okay.
So
this
is
the
elements.
This
is
how
nice
to
see
these
are
the
osc
challenges.
This
is
why
this
is
useful
and
not
so
so.
That's
that's
how
you
can
you
can
help
and
we
can
probably
draw
from
casino
we've
got.
We
said,
there's
a
whole
bunch
of
them.
You
know,
maybe,
let's
take
a
few
more,
perhaps
and
take
out
that
element
that
that
particular
theory
is
good
at
that.
A
A
This
I
mean
the
mash-up
concept,
it's
part
of
our
part
of
our
collaborative
literacy.
It's
the
fact
that
no
everybody's
related,
because
everybody
has
a
piece
of
the
puzzle,
yet
we're
trying
to
put
it
into
one,
and
actually
we
have
explicit
mechanisms
where
we
with
awareness
we
take
pieces
from
many
places
and
put
them
to
something,
that's
better
than
any
of
the
others.
So
so.