►
From YouTube: Development Meeting - Nov 28, 2017
Description
See notes at http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/Development_Team_Log
Contents:
1. Modular power cube for 4-stacking to 64 hp - v 17.11
2. MicroTrac - field testing, v17.10
3. LifeTrac - ready for prototyping, v 17.10
No meeting next 2 weeks due to Costa Rica collaboration trip - exploring potential workshops for March, 2018.
-----------
What you see here at Open Source Ecology is an ambitious program based on a volunteer effort. To help us reach the goals - please consider joining as an OSE Developer in 2017-
http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/OSE_Developers
Take a minute to subscribe to our email newsletter (updates, workshops, etc): http://bit.ly/1LtcM44
A
A
Now
that's
the
working
doc.
So,
let's
see
who
do
we
have
here?
Just
you
that
yeah,
let's
just
keep
going,
keep
going.
So
the
latest
updates
are,
let's
take
a
look
at
page
one,
so
the
development
team
hours
yeah
definitely
a
little
trail
trail
down
for
the
end
of
the
year
as
we
near
Christmas
here,
but
we'll
need
it
because
next
year
is
gonna,
be
ambitious,
so
pretty
much
planning
on
redoubled
scheduled
for
next
year.
Thinking
about
growth
of
OSC
I've
been
doing
some
planning
and
thinking
about
it.
A
And
what
I'd
like
to
do
is
post
a
schedule
for
next
year's
events,
probably
by
like
February.
First
to
have
the
whole
calendar
filled
out.
We
ran
a
few
good
workshops,
starting
almost
a
regular
3d
printer
workshop
this
year
and
we're
gonna
continue
that
and
then
adding
some
of
the
other
ones
like
the
micro
track
is
quite
promising.
A
I
mean
the
machine
is
working
really
well
so
far
and
adding
more
of
the
brick
press
looking
at
it,
the
house
builds
back
to
that
I
mean
we
were
near
to
complete
finishing
of
the
CD
eco
home
right
here,
and
it's
beautiful,
absolutely
outstanding.
I
must
say
in
terms
of
all
the
systems,
the
PV,
the
hydraulics,
the
water
system,
the
electrical
system,
how
efficient
it
is,
the
aquaponics
that
are
going
to
be
finished
there.
It's
the
bio
digester,
so
very
promising
results
and
and
I
think
we're.
A
You
know
like
I,
always
say
we're
almost
ready
for
prime
time
and
it's
it's
building
I
mean
we're
kind
of
having
this
long
period
of
incubation
to
get
a
lot
more
activity
going,
but
I
was
thinking
that
one
one
way
to
simply
double
our
impact,
and
the
impact
is
such
that
from
the
workshops.
We
get
a
lot
of
people
finding
out
about
our
work
and
some
people
joining
the
team,
but
we
just
got
to
keep
going
and
creating
that
economic
impact
and
simply
doubling
the
number
of
workshops
would
be
one
way
to
do
that.
A
Just
by
placing
a
regular
workshop
on
us
on
a
calendar
every
every
month,
as
well
as
getting
finally
to
that
that
immersion
training
programs
I've
been
talking
a
lot
about
in
a
sense
that
we
need
other
people
to
be
doing
this
for
their
livelihood
and
I
think
it's
definitely
possible.
I
mean
on
average
OSC
like
as
far
as
our
budget
I
mean
we've
been
doing
about
a
hundred
K
per
year.
I
mean
that's,
that's
not
a
lot.
A
I
mean
there's
a
bunch
of
foundation
funding
and
after
the
TED
talk
and
all
that
a
bunch
of
money
came
in
at
that
time
were
in
like
the
that
three
or
four
year
period,
we
we
brought
in
like
a
million
bucks
or
so
from
all
these
foundations
and
grants.
We
hired
some
people.
Money
ran
out
now
we're
going
back
strong
to
the
bootstrap
funding
or
that's
the
way
to
scale
the
project.
As
I
mentioned,
it's
like
we're
not
going
to
grow
this
by
foundation
money.
A
This
is
about
getting
this
off
the
ground
by
real
economic
activity
that
people
can
bootstrap
luyt.
In
other
words,
we
could
be
unlimited
in
terms
of
our
scalability.
If
we
teach
others
to
bootstrap
and
fund
their
operations
in
an
ongoing
way,
just
like
we
have
done
here
where
we're
doing
workshops
producing
things,
making
some
products
for
sale,
some
some
of
the
educational
experience
between
the
production
and
education,
that
business
model
I
think
is
there
and
it's
it's
ready
to
be
replicated.
A
A
B
A
Yeah
people
are
taking
off
on
vacation,
maybe
maybe
yeah
we
take
off
have
a
little
little
bit
of
rest
for
the
holidays.
Here,
I
am
gonna,
be
back
about
the
14th
of
December.
Maybe
we
can
try
getting
back
on
on
a
meeting
schedule
there.
That's
that's
Christmas
week,
but
we
can
definitely
try
to
check
in
see
where
we
are.
Maybe
have
some
inspiring
conversation
at
that
point.
So
yeah,
let's,
let's
keep
that
I'm
going
away
to
Costa,
Rica
and
Belize
for
the
next
two
weeks,
and
that
is
main
thing.
A
There
is
a
workshop
opportunity
there
there's
some
collaborators
down
there,
we're
looking
at
a
tractor,
build
and
a
brick
press,
build
down
there
and
potentially
for
getting
ready
for
building
some
housing
now,
but
it's
an
interesting
opportunity
and
potential
potential
site
for
a
future
OSC
branch.
Indeed,
so
it's
there's
a
lot
of
potential
there
and
definitely
I'm
interested
in
running
workshops
in
different
places,
which
is
pretty
much
the
first
time
that
we're
gonna
be
taking
the
big
machine
builds
elsewhere.
If
this
actually
happens,
we've
done
some
some
3d
printer
workshops
on
a
regular
basis.
A
Almost
the
big
machines.
We
have
hardly
done
and
we've
done,
one
build
in
Wisconsin
one
time
there
was
a
few
years
ago,
but
as
far
as
traveling
to
remote
locations,
I
think
that's
that's
a
good
thing
to
do,
because
you
know
there's
many
many
places
that
people
would
like
to
get
heavy
heavy
equipment
built
or
houses
built,
which
we
obviously
for
the
houses
you
would
have
to
travel
to
build
in
other
locations.
So
that's
interesting
just
trying
to
get
to
a
more
broad
international
schedule.
A
As
far
as
the
project
goes,
so
that's
gonna
be
next
two
weeks
exploring
that
opportunity,
which
would
be
great
if
it
works
out
as
far
as
just
basic
progress
here
on
the
micro
track,
so
I'm
field
testing
is
my
report.
I've
been
what
I've
done
so
far
is
actually
I
had
to
make
some
adjustments.
So
I
switched
out
the
power
cube
because
put
in
a
smaller
pump,
so
we
can
get
higher
psi.
The
tracks
just
didn't
have
enough
drive
torque,
so
I
switched
out
from
one
point:
nine
to
cubic
inch
to
a
point.
A
Six
seven
cubic
inch
hydraulic
pump,
which
means
it
gave
us
the
full
3,000
psi,
as
opposed
to
like
2000
psi.
That
definitely
helps
so
right
now.
I
also
switched
the
loader
mounting
as
far
as
the
bucket
mounting
I
moved
the
top
pinhole
down
to
inches,
because
the
dump
of
the
bucket
was
not
happening
was
only
going
down
to
about
45
degrees.
So,
by
moving
the
top
mount
point
of
the
bucket
cylinders,
I
was
able
to
get
the
full
180
degree
dump,
meaning
that
you're
dumping
the
bucket
straight
vertically
down.
A
So
that
was
pretty
much
spent
this
week,
modifying
the
equipment
I'm
ready
to
go
and
go
back
out
buddies.
You
see
here,
it's
machines,
working
relatively
well
in
one
pass.
I
can
pretty
much
go
through
like
six
inches
of
soil
kind
of
bulldozer
duty.
So
that's
that's
pretty
good
for
a
very
small
machine
like
this
and
I'm
gonna
continue
that
to
dig
the
drainage
trench.
So
that's
that's.
In
progress,
positive
results,
I
mean
the
machine
is
good,
like
I
put
a
little
pedestal
for
driving
on
the
back
of
the
tractor.
A
Basically,
an
operator
stand
with
the
levers
in
front
of
that
so
yeah,
that's
that's
pretty
good
and
as
far
as
the
power
cubes
switch
out,
that
was
pretty
good,
basically
put
a
hoist
to
it,
lifted
out
the
power
cube
and
replace
the
pump
and
put
the
power
cube
back
in,
so
that
was
those
relatively
decent
okay
as
far
as
dumb,
so
that
kind
of
covers
the
micro
tract.
What
I'm
gonna
be
doing
today
and
basically
today
is
dig
that
draining
trench
so
basic.
You
get
some
good
data
points
on
reel
functionality
in
the
field.
A
B
B
B
A
A
A
So
that's
definitely
a
priority
for
getting
this
real
big
machine
up
and
up
and
running
properly,
and
it's
good
that
we're
doing
the
micro
track
with
a
16
or
18
horsepower
right
now,
because
if
that
really
shows
the
limits
of
what
you
can
do
with
the
lower
amount
of
horsepower
and
still
a
functional,
smaller
machine
leading
towards
the
stacking
of
these
machines
together
to
make
the
larger
machine
like
you
know,
we've
talked
about
it
as
a
stack
ability.
Scalability
of
these
machines.
I
think
there's
gonna
be
good
insight
coming
from
that.
A
Oh
ya
know:
Roberta
does
have
an
update
here:
Ray's
loader
arms,
yeah,
I'm
downloading
that
but
yeah
he
he
does
have
an
update
on
that
anything
to
do
you
have
any
CAD
updates
on
the
power
cube
or
you
didn't
get
much
on
that,
because
maybe
we
can
just
keep
going
it
unless
you've
got
some
specific
questions
on.
Oh.
B
Yeah,
hey
I,
started
kind
of
just
do
that
file
which
I
linked
to
in
the
document.
It's
of
course
embedded
on
my
log
power.
Cue,
Montville,
ariel
aegean,
want
to
just
assemble
our
game.
Imma
we've
got
time
and
we're
kind
of
regrouping,
I
figure.
We've
got
a
ways
to
do
this,
so
I
was
thinking
more
about
the
design
of
it.
Some
of
the
issues
have
had
with
the
differences
between
the
CAD
and
the
workshop
and
been
improving
and
I.
B
Think
a
lot
of
the
CAD
stuff,
better
I
think
I've
been
learning
how
to
use
that
better
and
so
try
to
figure
out
more
ways
to
improve
the
workflow
and
eat
it
more
out
of
the
bowl
because
constantly
spent
a
lot
time
going
back
and
editing
making
changes
stall.
These
modules
so
seems
like
they
need
to
be
more
modular
dirt
and
of
the
bowl.
So
on
so
see
about
the
main
thing
right
now,
I'm
trying
to
do
is
separate
the
tank
from
the
cube.
B
A
Well,
ABI
I
mean
that's
what
we
do
want
to
do.
That
is
once
the
when
we
have
the
CNC
torch
table
running
that
and
this
time
around
we
just
didn't
have
the
CNC
torch
table,
but
that
is
the
efficient
way
to
do
that.
At
that
point,
you
need
six
pieces,
all
the
holes,
including
the
hydraulic
reservoir
holes
and
the
holes
for
mounting
the
engine
and
everything
else
are
finished
in
those
six
pieces.
So
that's
the
efficient
way
to
do
it
and
of
course
we
didn't
do
that.
That's
why
you
know.
A
In
those
four
days
we
could
only
build
the
micro
tract.
We
were
aiming
initially
to
build
the
other
tractor
as
well,
because
I
mean
realistically
it
does
take
one
to
two
days
once
you
have
all
the
parts
cut
efficiently.
It's
it
just
doesn't
take
so
there's
only
so
many
parts
to
the
to
the
whole
design,
but
so
you're
referring
to
breaking
down
a
CAD
into
a
better
modularity.
A
B
A
B
It
looks
like
it's
a
different
combinations
of
things
welded
together
there,
maybe
from
the
previous
photo
there's
some
older
photos
that
I
have
I
think
that
are
posted
Pete.
There
was
pcs
17.8,
which
I
think
have
that
luxe
blitter
thinking
which
I
think
changed
and
stuff,
but
the
photos
of
the
frame
considered
considered
first,
because
you
know
trying
to
get
six
pieces
sound
sample.
If
you
cut
it
with
us
again
skew
towards
Table
two,
maybe
it
is
it
simpler?
B
B
A
B
Have
somebody
run
the
iron
worker
plus
it's
time
like
there
were
issues
with
the
tank
being
welded,
so
I
thought
the
tank.
If
there's
six
sides,
the
tank
is
like
part
of
the
sides
and
all
that
and
that's
the
way
it
is
in
the
CAD
and
I
was
thinking
well,
we
should
separate
the
tank
is
a
separate
parallel
module
to
the
frame
and
then
weld
the
frame
and
the
tank
together
later
that
way
they
can
be
done
in
parallel.
B
A
Well,
let
me
provide
the
feedback
on
that,
because
the
feedback
is
very
simple.
What
you're
proposing
is
gonna
take
five
to
ten
times
more
time
and
that's
based
on
our
experience,
because
if
you
have
all
those
pieces,
they
still
have
to
be
measured.
Yes,
cutting
is
easy
and
it's
probably
even
cheaper
to
do
it
from
stock
materials
because
torch
cutting
if
you're
gonna
outsource
that
that's
more
expensive.
A
The
harder
part
is
the
alignment,
because,
once
you
have
the
four
pieces,
for
example,
for
one
side,
that's
square
in
order
to
make
that
a
square
you're
gonna
have
to
do
precise
angles
to
align
and
measure
that
so
it's
exactly
square
and
it
fits
fits
completely
and
then
any
anywhere
that
you're
off
you're
just
gonna
get
little
gaps.
So
what
we
found
is
that
I
mean
I
can
tell
you
right
now.
A
Six
sides
for
a
3d
printer,
five
minutes
to
weld
manually
if
I
had
to
do
that
by
and
we've
done,
that
with
a
power
cube.
If
we
have
to
do
that
manually,
laying
it
up
the
part
that's
difficult.
Is
that
actually
laying
it
up
for
squaring
it
up
and
then
making
it
into
a
three-dimensional
shape?
So
you
talk
about
five
five
minutes
versus
about
one
hour
to
two
hours.
I
mean
that's
just
the
experience.
So
while
it
sounds
like
now,
there's
a
second.
A
Second
point,
though,
there's
a
very
important
second
point
to
that,
you
said
how
about
we
modularized
the
tank,
because
that
way
we
can
do
it
in
parallel.
That
sounds
like
a
good
idea.
However,
then
you
get
into
the
issue
like
once.
You
weld
the
tank.
If
you're
gonna
weld
the
other
pieces
to
the
pieces
that
you
are
to
the
tank,
that's
already
welded,
there's
a
risk
of
upon
the
second
weld
you're
actually
going
to
put
holes
into
the
place
where
you're
welding
the
other
pieces
to
the
tank.
A
It's
like
there's
a
bunch
of
welds
and
a
difficult
part
about
welding
is
wherever
you
start
and
stop
like
say
you
want
to
weld
any
of
those
thin
long
pieces
to
the
tank,
you're
you're,
simply
putting
a
risk
of
making
puncture
holes
little
pin
holes
in
the
tank
itself.
So
while
it
sounds
good
like
the
only
way
you
could
do
that
without
making
that
risk
is,
if
you
offset
the
weld
location
to
a
different
place
where
you're
actually
not
welding
around
the
prior
weld.
A
So
while
that
sounds,
you
know
like
in
principle,
it
sounds
like
parallel
would
be
good.
It's
not
in
this
case,
because
upon
joining
those
together,
you
run
the
risk
of
puncturing
making
little
pinholes,
and
then
you
basically
have
to
redo
the
welding.
That's
the
part
that
kills
it
when
you
have
to
do
redo,
that
to.
B
More
assembly
I
did
also
kind
of
think
about
the
way
that
it's
assembled
in
the
cat
in
detail.
So
hopefully,
all
those
parts
then
can
just
be
used
to
visit,
accepts
or
whatever
the
torching
and
I,
also
detailed
it
where
the
assembly
was
different.
I
have
offsets
and
I've
been
doing
using
a
lot
more
constraints,
so
thinking
about
the
way
that
the
pieces
can
be
clamped
together
for
welding,
because
I
assume
that's
an
issue
well,
actually,
if.
A
B
A
If
you
talk
about
the
six
pieces
that
are
accurate
and
already
cut,
it's
relatively
easy,
like
the
way
we
did
it
with
were
the
3d
printers
and
we
simply
put
magnet
holder's
on
each
side
and
that
pretty
much
as
long
as
the
edges
are
straight
I
mean
they.
They
just
fit
right
together
and
just
weld
it,
and
it's
really
quick.
So
that's
that's.
A
B
B
A
B
A
B
B
A
You
can
weld
it
like
if,
if
you
don't
have
a,
if
you
don't
have
a
groove,
you
can
weld
it
on
an
insight,
for
example
like
if
you
bought
them
up
like
right
next
to
each
other.
You
can
you
can
wall
them
on
the
inside,
so
you
don't
really
need
that
stuff.
Okay,
I'm,
just
I'm!
Looking
at
your
like
I'm
missing,
were
the
power
cube
that
would
be
1710
I'm
missing
that
do
you
have
a
link
to
your
your
modular
power,
cube
there
I'm,
seeing
people.
A
B
A
A
B
A
Well,
I
think
so.
So
let
me
just
share
share
the
conclusions
and
what
what
we
think
that
should
be
like.
So
far
the
the
issues
have
been
when
we
start
a
new
project
and
then
you
have
to
start
from
scratch
and
everything,
but
the
easiest
way
to
go
from
there
is
you
start
with
an
existing
file
and
modify
it
to
be
exactly
the
same
as
as
the
well
the
reflecting
all
the
new
changes
and
because
there's
typically
going
to
be
a
lot
of
changes
in
different
places.
A
You
want
to
just
make
sure
you've
got
all
the
parts
labeled
for
that
particular
version,
because
it's
gonna
because
at
the
end
of
the
day
it
becomes
hard
like,
for
example,
if
you're
using
version,
17
point
10
for
say
the
frame
and
then
you're
saying
oh.
But
but
you
know,
but
the
other
part
that
you
know
say
the
cooler
is
still
17.0
a
that
kind
of
gets
confusing.
So
you
want
to
update
it
nonetheless,
and
typically,
there's
changes
like
little
changes
on
everything,
because
we
still
haven't
stabilized
yet
to
the
super
final
version.
A
So
we
do
want
to
carry
forward
everything
and
and
be
redundant
on
on
the
versioning.
So
it's
simply
easy
for
somebody
like
somebody
does
not
have
to
have
any
other
information
outside
of
knowing
this
is
version.
17
point
10,
that's
what
we
found
was
the
easiest
to
do.
Otherwise
people
get
confused
like
what
do
you
use
with
what
so
you
want
to
keep
to
that,
but
I'm
noticing
on
power,
cube
version,
17
point:
10
I,
don't
see
a
file
there.
A
So,
let's,
if
you
want
to
just
start
that
file
and
put
everything,
if
you
wouldn't
mind,
starting
that
and
an
apart
library,
I
mean,
unfortunately
it's
it's
that
that
extensive,
but
but
I
mean
we
have
to
do
that,
simply
because
we're
rolling
out
one
prototype
after
another
and
with
hardware,
because
you're
changing
I
mean
we're
still
changing
a
lot
of
things
we
still
want
to
yeah.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
we
carry
forward
everything
and
and
keep
it
simple,
but
we
do
have
to.
A
A
A
Right,
yes,
so,
let's,
let's
definitely
do
that
because
at
17
point
10
Abe.
So
with
that,
so
let's
talk
about
the
versioning
just
a
little
bit
because
for
1708
we've
got
them.
Let's
see
is
the
cat
up
there.
Where
is
that
cat?
The
part
library,
yes,
there's
a
PC
1708
master
1710-
is
what
we're
currently
using
in
in
micro
track
version
17.1,
oh
now
there
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
get
the
version
exactly
as
we
have
as
built.
A
You
know
you
could
you
can
start
it
by?
You
can
name
it
by
like
when
you're
working
on
and
I
think
you
could
either
call
like
17
point
11.
It's
probably
like
best
to
do
it
17
11,
since
that's
the
new
version
right
now,
because
we
don't
know
when
that
build
is.
That
is
exactly
going
to
be
so
I
think
you're.
B
A
A
B
A
Like
that
we
want
to
have
I
can
say
that
for
the
64
horsepower
version
we
want
to
have
10
gallons
of
fluid.
Definitely
I
think
right
now,
where
we're
at
the
size
of
7.5
gallons,
meaning
three
quarters
filled
like
like
the
core
by
six
sorry,
the
four
inch
wide
reservoir
which
we
currently
have
that
is,
went
to
about
2/3
full
that's
about
7
gallons,
so
we
do
want
to
increase
it
to
6
inches,
at
least
so
that
we
do
want
to
do
because
yeah
five
gallons
gets
a
little.
It's
a
little
pushing
it.
B
A
B
B
A
I
mean
just
just
one
note:
let
me
explain
the
tank
sizing,
then
principle,
you
don't
need
any
any
tank
at
all.
If
the
volume
of
your
hydraulic
fluid
then
change,
it
could
be
very
minimal
like,
for
example,
if
you
have
hydraulic
motors
they
are
always
filled.
So
the
volume
like
if
you're,
just
running
hydraulic
motors,
the
volume
in
the
system
does
not
change.
However,
if
you're
running
cylinders,
the
concept
is,
if
you
fill
up
as
a
cylinder
completely,
that
means
you've
sucked
a
lot
of
fluid
out
of
the
reservoir.
A
You
need
fluid
to
fill
up
a
cylinder.
So
if
you
have
a
bunch
of
cylinders
in
the
system,
I
don't
know
some
crazy
machines
got
a
huge
number
of
cylinders.
Then
you
totally
drain
the
tank
of
all
the
fluid,
so
you
have
to
have
enough
reserve
that
you're
never
getting
into
an
issue
with
idea
that
if
the
tank
sloshes
around
you
don't
want
it
to
be
so
low
that
you
get
an
air
pocket
and
you're
sucking
air
into
the
system.
So
it's
not
good.
A
It
destroys
it's
not
good
for
the
pump
so,
but
but
like
10
gallons
I
can
say
that
the
first
life-track
one,
which
was
actually
a
50/50
horsepower
engine.
That's
before
we
really
went
modular
on
it.
We
had
a
about
a
10
gallons
of
hydraulic
fluid
in
that
system,
so
yeah
about
about
a
10
gallon
reservoir.
So
we
were
we'd
want
to
go
for
about
10
gallons.
At
this
point,
yeah
a
little
wider.
B
A
B
A
Yeah,
the
taller
we're
gonna
just
have
to
make
sure
that,
regarding
at
all
just
the
learnings
from
version
17
point
10
are
that
after
we
put
on
the
rubber
mounts
for
the
engine
which
were
about
1
inch
tall,
we
ended
up
not
being
able
to
fit
the
hydraulic
cooler
on
the
top.
It
was
just
too
close.
So
that's
the
only
thing
want
to
be
very
careful
about.
After
you
put
the
metal
grade
there
to
mount
the
cooler
and
the
fan
I
mean
the
fan
is
so
thick
and
the
cooler
is
so
thick.
A
We
have
to
have
enough
space
that
that
we're
above
the
engine
and
and
the
muffler,
you
also
have
to
pay
attention
to
the
location
of
the
muffler,
because
the
muffler
is
really
hot,
so
you
don't
want
them
hot
muffler
right
next
to
the
hydraulic
cooler
yep.
But
besides
that,
there's
no
need
to
go.
Go
taller,
I,
think
for
a
low
center
of
gravity
altogether
for
the
machines
we
care
about
a
lot
about
low
center
of
gravity
for
safety,
so
the
smaller
in
terms
of
hide
the
better
in
general.
A
B
Keep
breaking
up
sporadically
but
I
think
I
get
the
gist
to
that.
So
yeah
I'll
just
sit
him
picking
a
taller.
All
I'll
make
it
wider
or
not.
Well
not
the
whole
cube
I
can
increase
the
size
of
the
tank
within
the
existing
cube
size
yo.
Well,
then,
then,
we
know
that
there
is
a
problem.
That's
that
actually
now
that
I'm
looking
at
it,
the
larger
cooler.
Does
there
right?
Okay,
so
okay.
A
Yeah,
so
let's
discuss
that
guard
yeah
I
saw
that
it's
it's
pretty
much
yeah,
it's
pretty
much
barely
fitting
in
there.
So
what
I
would
suggest
there
I
mean
what
do
you
think
about
the
idea
of
having
the
cooler
in
front
of
the
air
intake
and
have
then
individual
coolers
on
each
power
cube,
because
that
would
address
the
electricity
issue
in
these
power.
Cubes
I'm
somewhat
inclined
because
of
this,
this
real
large
size
of
that
one
cooler
and
you're
right
about
that.
A
A
B
B
A
B
A
Yeah
I
think
that
might
be
a
good
idea
just
because
as
you're
seeing
we're
having
mass
use
well,
look
at
that,
it's
only
$63,
Hayden
automotive
12:40
duty,
heavy
duty,
oil,
coolers
$63-
that's
not
bad
at
all.
Let's
just
do
that,
because
the
big
one
itself
is
like
a
hundred
eighty
or
so
we're
not
not
actually
being
you
know
not
actually
costing
the
big
one
is
costing
as
much
as
almost
you
know,
the
small
ones
yeah.
Definitely.
B
B
A
B
A
For
the
twelve
forty
prices,
not
too
bad
I
think,
let's
do
it.
That's
not
the
cost
doesn't
add
so
much
to
cost.
It
does
add
to
the
overall
complexity,
but
just
the
idea
of
that
thing
being
so
large
and
so
unwieldy
there
and
blocking
just
about
everything
that
power
cube
would
have
to
be
really
large
to
make
everything
easily
accessible,
so
I
would
go
and
and
simplify
and
go
back
to
them.
The
deeper
modularity.
Just
a
you
know
the
lower
level
modular
to
me,
which
means
that
more
of
the
components
aren't
are
on
each
unit.
A
B
A
We
don't
we
don't
friends
right
right,
so
they'll
be
pretty
close
to
sim,
pretty
close
to
being
identical,
accepted
having
a
tank
versus
not
so
that
actually
is
good
for
the
overall
system,
we're
not
using
two
different
coolers
and
so
forth.
So
that's
good
and
then
remember
for
the
big
power
cube.
We
still
want
to
have
four
suctions
and
four
returns
that
we
want
to
be
able
to
accommodate
yeah
yep.
A
A
Yeah
it's
easy
to
like
we
found
that
if
you
go
directly
just
a
simple
fitting
and
then
a
quick
coupler
back
to
the
tank,
that's
pretty
convenient
as
opposed
to
getting
in
a
you
know
like
one
fitting
and
then
you're
teeing
off
it,
and
you
know
multiple
tees,
one
they're
easier
to
break
off
and
two.
You
have
to
worry
about
leakage,
holes
that
every
yeah
it's
it's
mainly
that
it's
just
that
straight
in
back
to
the
tank,
is
just
really
easy
easy
to
implement.
A
Where
you
start
getting
a
lot
of
tees
and
everything
it
kind
of
gets
messy
and
a
little
harder
to
work
with.
So
just
the
minimum
unit.
I
think
I.
Think
the
the
return
straight
in
and
the
suction
straight
out
makes
it
very
easy,
because
we've
done
before,
where
we
we've
done
one
one
fitting
and
then
like
T
it
off,
but
with
all
the
fittings
they're
like,
especially
in
the
suctions,
which
are
typically
like
pretty
large
like
when
you
do
multiple
ones.
A
You
have
to
do
like
more
than
one
inch
like
one
and
a
half
inch
hose
even
for
the
suctions.
Once
you
get
to
the
multiple
suction
requirements,
so
so
doing
a
bunch
of
bunch
that
are
just
one
inch,
one
inch
suction
lines
or
even
we
could
possibly
even
get
away
with
three-quarter
and
it's
still
still
good
yeah
yeah.
So
just
continue
that
I
think
that's!
That's
a
that's
a
workable,
very
nice
working
idea.
I
guess.
B
A
No,
no
we're
just
torching.
So
once
again,
this
is
all
torch.
No,
no!
You
don't
have
to
you
have
to
weld
something
in
we're,
not
tapping
it
in
that's.
Once
again
you
get
the
CNC
cut,
all
the
holes
are
there
and
you
just
weld.
Oh
man
weld
the
fittings
in.
So
that's
that's
been
pretty
easy
to
do,
especially
if
the
and
you
don't
necessarily
need
them
to
be
like
a
pin
hole
in.
A
A
D
A
Exactly
because
of
the
rapid
rapid
turnaround,
basically
the
large
number
of
cycling
times
you
just
literally
need
one
filter
going
back.
We
had
it
mounted
directly
to
the
the
filter
was
mounted
directly
to
the
reservoir
and
yeah.
As
long
as
you
have
at
least
one
filter,
you're
you're
able
to
filter
all
the
fluid
because
of
the
cycling
yeah.
B
Okay,
so
yeah
yeah,
most
of
my
questions.
Okay,
you
men,
don't
change
some
things
I'm
on
the
module
Larry
because
it
says,
like
the
main
difference,
is
the
tanks
and
going
back
to
that
smaller
cooler,
so
that
most
of
the
issues,
yep
I,
don't
think
I
haven't
I,
can't
change
the
cube
get
much
so
Brian
was
probably
pretty
good
other
than
yeah
else.
Oh,
okay,
their
track.
Okay,.
B
B
B
A
A
Okay,
but
yes
far
as
all
those
plumbing
issues
like
Roberta's
gonna
have
whatever
whatever
his
geometry
is.
First
make
sure
that
we've
got
good
geometry
on
what
we
have
with
the
power
cube,
I,
think
and
then
we
can,
because
we
can
always
put
fittings
on
to
turn
things
a
certain
way.
I
think
probably
the
bigger
constraint
is
how
the
power
cube
comes
out
in
the
first
place.
A
A
B
A
A
B
A
E
A
E
A
Right,
there's
this
one
part
on
the
time.
Looking
at
the
tractor,
where
the
back
you've
got
the
verticals
for
the
tensioner
they're
inside
of
the
one
of
that
triangulating
piece
and
I,
guess
that
could
be
okay,
yeah
I
think
that's
all
right!
There,
yeah
I,
think
the
next
step
on
here
I
see
you've
got
the
court
yeah.
The
three
power
cubes
organized
in
this
interesting
fashion
on
the
back
and
the
big
one
straddling
the
top
yeah
I.
Think
we'll
wait
for
Abe
to
be
finished
with,
maybe
like
add
the
finish.
A
That
length
of
the
the
arm
is
is
quite
long,
but
I
mean
because
it's
triangulating
kind
of
making
a
triangle
shape
with
the
with
a
raising
cylinder
that
may
be.
Okay,
because,
like
all
the
force
is
gonna,
be
where
that
cylinders
is
attaching
to
the
to
the
loader
arm.
That's
where,
like
all
that
force
is
gonna,
be.
A
D
D
A
A
A
Yeah,
absolutely
absolutely
that's
that's
easy
to
add.
You
just
need
another
valve
and
integrated
in
the
system.
So
right
now,
what
we
have
is
the
system
right
now
has
two
valves:
each
are
two
channel
valves,
but
just
adding
one
downstream.
That's
that's
an
easy
thing
to
do
so
as
soon
as
we
and
the
fact
I'll
be
showing
that,
if
not
in
the
next
few
days,
it
would
have
to
be
a
few
weeks,
as
I
said,
I'm
going
traveling
for
the
next
two
weeks,
but
the
PTO
basically
power
take-off.
A
B
A
B
A
I
I,
don't
know
I
think
I
mean
the
the
recording
here.
It's
since
it's
recording
on
my
screen.
It's
it's
relatively
clear.
No
right
now!
Basically,
what
happened
is
my
my
internet
got
disconnected
and
then
that
and
I
just
haven't
set
it
up
yet
because
we're
doing
a
lot
of
work
outside
here,
while
the
weather
was
good.
A
So
right
now,
I'm,
actually
at
the
CD
go
home
on
the
on
a
satellite
connection
which
ran
out
of
data
right
now
so
I'm
on
a
slow
connection,
but
know
we
should
be
getting
that
fixed
up
relatively
well
I'm,
not
seeing
much
of
an
issue
on
a
video
upload
like
before
the
last
two
weeks.
I
think
it
was
pretty
good
right.
Was
that
acceptable
before.
B
A
B
A
The
thing
that
that
was
taking
time
typically
is
what
I
do
is
I
compressed
the
meeting
cuz.
Otherwise
it's
like
two
gig,
so
the
only
thing
I
could
do
is
try
to
save
the
meeting
at
a
lower
resolution
so
that
I
don't
have
to
compress
it.
But
I
do
typically
is
compress
like
four
hours
and
then
I
uploaded,
but
no
I
mean
there's.
B
A
B
A
B
B
B
A
A
We,
the
bottom
line,
is
on
getting
better
just
like
a
better
cat
and
documentation
on
the
workshops.
It's
because
a
lot
of
designs
are
changing
and
evolving
is
is
where
we
have
like
some
mixed
documentation,
some
from
prior
workshops
and
some
from
of
the
updated
designs.
But
this
all
leads
to
I
mean
improving
our
design
and
documentation.
Capacity.
I
mean
we're
I,
don't
think
we're
there
yet
as
far
as
where
we
need
to
be,
and
then
so,
we
got
to
keep
building
the
team
and
it's
like
we
have
to
think
about.
A
So
maybe,
as
we
go
into
next
year,
we
want
to
think
about
reevaluating
after
this
whole
year
of
activity.
How
can
we
scale
the
team
up
and
how?
How
can
we
do
a
better
job,
constantly
improving
thinking
about
radical
solutions?
That
kind
of
I
like
to
think
about
10x
like
how
do
we
get
a
10
times
better,
not
just
a
little
bit
better,
not
10
percent,
better
but
10
times
better.
So
we
definitely
want
to
think
about
how
to
do
that.
But
yeah
I
mean
it's.
A
You
know
constant
process
and,
as
we
stabilize
some
of
these
designs
and
we
get
closer
to
final,
it
gets
easier
and
easier.
I
think
it's
getting
a
little
easier
through
time
and
it's
it's
just
a
long
process.
I
mean
we've
got
so
much
on
our
plate
that
it
just
takes
time
so
anyway.
Well,
that's
good!
A
I'll
have
some
internet
access,
so
we
can
take
a
little
break
and
then
then
get
back
to
it
and
we're
planning
for
an
ambitious
schedule
for
next
year
and
as
far
as
workshops
in
different
locations.
So
with
that
said,
I
think
they'll
be
good.
Let's,
let's
keep
going
at
it.
You
know
continue
what
you
can
and
I'm
doing
a
bit
of
planning
for
next
year
to
see
how
we
can
move
forward
in
a
better
way
and
continue
going.